Far Eastern University High School
Humanities and Social Sciences
Name:
Strand and Section:
Criteria
Depth and Relevance
Does the presentation have
valuable argument?
Total = 20 Points
Integration of Concepts
Did the student integrate
important concepts and lessons
to the group presentation?
Is the student well versed in the
topic?
Total = 20 Points
Presentation
Did the student speak clearly?
Did the student engage the
facilitator?
Was it obvious the material had
been rehearsed?
Presentation = 10 Points
Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person
A.Y. 2018 – 2019 | First Semester
GRADING CRITERIA RUBRIC FOR ORAL EXAMINATIONS (INDIVIDUAL)
Total Score:
Date:
Exceptional/Distinguished Admirable/Proficient Acceptable/Basic Unacceptable/Mediocre
The statements of the student The statements of the student The statements of the students The student provided very little or amount of
provided an exceptional amount provided a good amount of provided sufficient amount of description, depth, and relevance to the group’s
of description, depth, and support to the group’s thesis description, depth, and thesis.
relevance to the group thesis. relevance to the group’s thesis
20 Points 15 Points 10 Points 5 points
The ideas of the student have The ideas of the student have The ideas of the student were The student did not exhibit integration of his own
been effectively integrated to been integrated to the overall satisfactory in terms of their idea to the group.
the overall argument of the argument of the group. integration to the overall
group. argument of the group.
20 Points 15 Points 10 Points 5 Points
Thoughts were clearly Thoughts were clearly Thoughts were inconsistently The student was not confident, unorganized,
articulated in an organized and presented and somehow organized presented resulting to the unstructured, and demonstrated little evidence of
well-structured way throughout and structured. There is an facilitator’s difficulty of planning prior to presentation. The content of the
the presentation. There is an evidence of average level of deciphering the argument of the defense has numerous errors in the areas of logic
evidence of thorough preparation preparation prior to the argument of the group on the consistency, clarity, and coherence.
prior to the presentation. The presentation. The content of the whole. There is an evidence of
content of the defense has no defense has a few errors in the some preparation prior to the
errors in the areas of logic areas of logic, consistency, presentation. The content of the
consistency, clarity, and clarity, and coherence. defense has several errors in the
coherence. areas of logic, consistency,
clarity, and coherence.
10 Points 7 Points 5 Points 3 Points