Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Answer Ad Cautelam
Answer Ad Cautelam
ORLANDO M. MATEO
Petitioner,
x------------------------------------------------x
ANSWER
(AD CAUTELAM)
11. At the inception of the present case, Riviera was not impleaded
as a defendant. Without its inclusion as party, there can be no final
determination of the present case. The Corporation possess such an
3 Fort Bonifacio Development Corporation v. Hon. Sorongon, G.R. No. 176709, May 8, 2009, 587 SCRA 613, 622-
623, citing Moldes v. Villanueva, G.R. No. 161955, 31 August 2005, 48 SCRA 697, 707.
PRAYER
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise
prayed for.
By:
JOSABETH V. ALONSO
PTR No. 6615031/Makati City/01-03-18
IBP No. 022741/Quezon City/01-03-18
Roll No. 34994
MCLEComp.No.V-0011644
11 November 2015
Copy Furnished: