Lecture 5 PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

&

Auditing
Assurance
Services(M)
Semester 1 2019
Semester 1: 2019 Lecture 5:
UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE Assessing Inherent Risk and Specific Business Risks,
BUSINESS SCHOOL and Determining Materiality
Dr Phil Saj PhD CPA
University of Adelaide 2

Audit Planning Assess Business Risk


Initial audit planning
The risk that a company’s business
Understand the entity and its environment objectives will not be attained as a result of
internal and external factors…which may
Identify business risks that may result in material threaten profitability and survival.
misstatements in the financial statements

Make a preliminary judgement about materiality SWOT ANALYSIS

Determine Make a preliminary PEST ANALYSIS


inherent risk assessment of control risk
VALUE CHAIN APPROACH
Develop an audit strategy for significant assertions

Perform Preliminary Simple comparison with prior period and


Analytical Procedures industry using ratio analysis

■ At the planning stage, the auditor uses Your knowledge of your client’s industry suggests
analytical procedures as a risk assessment your client is experiencing significant pressure
tool to identify issues of which the he/ she was from competitors undercutting sales prices. You
unaware. perform the following analysis.

■ Enhances understanding of the client and its CLIENT INDUSTRY


environment. 2018 2017 2018 2017
Days in 110 80 81 78
■ Identifies areas that require greatest attention. inventory
■ Highlights unusual relationships and Gross 20.3% 26.4% 27.3% 26.2%
unexpected fluctuations. margin
percent

1
Determine Materiality Materiality for the Financial Report
■ Materiality for the financial report as a whole. as a Whole
■ Performance materiality. ■ The audit must be planned in such a way that the
auditor has a reasonable expectation of detecting
■ Materiality specific transaction classes/balances. any material misstatements.
■ An item is material if it will affect decisions. ■ Where the auditor believes that the risk of
■ The level of materiality set by the auditor in misstatement is higher, materiality will be set lower.
each audit is therefore determined by his/her
consideration of who uses the financial report
and for what purpose.
7

Performance Materiality Specific Materiality

■ If there is one or more specific transaction classes/


“The amount, or amounts set by the auditor at
balances for which misstatements of a lesser
less than materiality for the financial report as amount are expected to influence users’ decisions,
a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level a lower level of materiality will be applied there.

the possibility that the aggregate of ■ Examples


uncorrected and undetected misstatements ■ Remuneration
exceeds materiality for the financial report as a ■ Research and Development

whole”. [ASA320.9] ■ Items impacting loan covenants

Need to Consider I R at the Financial


Determine Inherent Risk (IR)
Report Level and at the Assertion Level
Susceptibility of an assertion to material ■ Some Inherent Risks have the potential to impact
misstatement given the inherent and widely on the financial statements.
environmental characteristics assuming ■ Management experience and knowledge
■ Unusual pressure on management
there are no related internal controls [ASA200.13].
■ Some Inherent Risks have the potential to impact
Inherent risks arise because of the only particular transaction classes and/ or balances.
■ Accounts requiring high levels of judgment
nature of the entity, including what it
■ E.g. results of previous audits
does, and its environment.
■ Audits are undertaken on segments (cycles).

2
Inherent risk associated with
Inherent Risk at the Financial
information technology
Report Level
■ Significant changes in I. T.
■ Integrity of management ■ Insufficient I.T. skills and resources
■ Management experience and knowledge ■ Lack of entity support and focus
■ Unusual pressures on management ■ High dependence on I.T.
■ Reliance on external I.T.
■ Nature of entity’s business
■ Reliance on external I.T.
■ Factors affecting the industry in which
entity operates ■ Reliability and complexity of I.T.
■ Information technology ■ Electronic commerce issues

I R at the Financial Report Level: Example Inherent risk at the assertion level
Inherent Existence of management bonus
risk scheme ■ Accounts likely to require adjustment

Incentive for management to increase ■ Complexity of underlying transactions


Impact recorded profit. E.g. by bringing forward
sales or recording fictitious sales ■ Judgment required in determining account balance
Account ■ Susceptibility of assets to loss or misappropriation
affected
Sales
■ Unusual or complex transactions. Especially
Assertions
affected Cut-off, occurrence; (ASA315.A124) at year end.

Audit
Inspect large entries in sales journal ■ Transactions not subject to ordinary processing
prior to balance date and trace them
procedure to shipping documents

I R at the Assertion Level: Example Assess special areas of business risk


Susceptibility of assets to
Inherent risk Fraud
misappropriation (e.g. silicon chips)

Impact Loss of assets Earnings management


Account bal.
Inventory Illegal acts
affected

Assertion
Existence (ASA315.A124) Related parties
most affected

Audit Inspect inventory records and


procedure
Appropriateness of going concern
compare with physical inventory

3
Fraud The auditor’s consideration of fraud
(ASA 240)
■ Intrinsically difficult to detect.
The intentional act by one or more
individuals among management, those ■ Audit should be planned to obtain a reasonable
assurance that fraud has not occurred, or, if it
charged with governance, employees has, it has been disclosed in the F.R.

or third parties involving the use of ■ Need to maintain an attitude of professional


scepticism. (Be aware of the possibility of fraud).
deception to obtain an unjust or illegal
advantage. ■ There can be greater risk of fraud due to the nature
of an item (e.g. cash), or changing
[ASA240 para 11]
conditions (e.g. recession).

Indicators of Fraud [ASA 240. Appendix 3] Audit procedures in response to fraud :


[ASA 240. Appendix 2]
Discrepancies in the accounting records
Consideration at the assertion level
■Transactions that are not recorded in a complete
or timely manner, or are improperly classified. ■Alter audit approach followed in the previous year
■ Perform substantive procedures on disaggregated data
Conflicting or missing evidence
■ Missing documents ■ Significant missing inventory Fraudulent financial reporting
■ Significant unexplained items or reconciliations ■ Revenue recognition ■ Inventory quantities
Problematic or unusual relationships ■ Management estimates
Between the auditor and management Misappropriation of assets
■ Unusual delays in response to requests for information.
■ Undue time pressures imposed by management to ■ Analysis of written-off amounts
resolve complex or contentious issues. ■ Confirming specific items

Earnings management Types of Earnings Management


Earnings management is the use of ■ Intentional violation of accounting standards
judgment and / or the structuring of and other reporting requirements that are
themselves immaterial.
transactions to alter financial reports to
influence the perceptions of those reading ■ Inappropriate revenue recognition.

the reports about the underlying economic ■“Big bath” changes under the guise of
performance of the company and/or to restructuring.

influence outcomes that are based on ■ Improper accruals and estimations of liabilities
in good times.
reported accounting numbers.

4
Illegal acts: (see ASA 250) Related Parties (see ASA 550)
■ Illegal acts are contraventions of laws
and regulations. ■ See Definition at ASA 550 paragraph 10

■ Auditor must consider impact of any ■ Important because:


contravention on the FR. ■ Requirements of accounting standards & laws
■ Lack of “market discipline”
■ While the audit program does not normally ■ Source of audit evidence
include procedures to specifically ■ Motivation for such transactions
discover illegal acts, they may be identified ■ But legal and acceptable
from other procedures.

Preliminary assessment of going Preliminary assessment of going


concern (see ASA 570) concern [ASA570]
■ Going concern: for the relevant period ■ When planning the audit (and when
undertaking audit procedures and
(12 months), the company is able to pay
evaluating the results), the auditor must
debts when due, and continue in consider the appropriateness of the GC
operation without any intention or basis of accounting.
necessity to liquidate or otherwise
wind up operations. ■ Also, note Corporations Law requirement
for directors’ declaration, which auditor
■ Consider indicators and mitigating factors reports on.

Indicators of G C Problems Mitigating Factors


ASA 570. A2 [See Textbook p.275]

Financial ■ Ability to dispose assets


Asset factors ■ Sale and leaseback
■ Net L or Net C L position
■ Arrears or discontinuance of dividends
■ Unused lines of credit
Debt factors
Operating ■ Debt restructuring
■ Loss of key management without replacement
■ Loss of license and/ or franchise ■ Postpone expenditures
Cost factors
■ Reduce discretionary expenditures
Other
■ Tech. development that renders product obsolete ■ Vary dividend
Equity factors
■ Failure of other entities in same industry ■ Additional investment

5
6

You might also like