Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mowen 2ce Solutions - ch04
Mowen 2ce Solutions - ch04
COST-VOLUME-PROFIT ANALYSIS:
A MANAGERIAL PLANNING TOOL
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. CVP analysis allows managers to focus on 8. Packages of products, based on the ex-
selling prices, volume, costs, profits, and pected sales mix, are defined as a single
sales mix. Many different “what-if” questions product. Selling price and cost information
can be asked to assess the effect of chang- for this package can then be used to carry
es in key variables on profits. out CVP analysis.
2. The units sold approach defines sales vol- 9. This statement is wrong; break-even analy-
ume in terms of units of product and gives sis can be easily adjusted to focus on target
answers in these same terms. The unit con- profit.
tribution margin is needed to solve for the
10. The basic break-even equation is adjusted
break-even units. The sales revenue ap-
for target profit by adding the desired target
proach defines sales volume in terms of
revenues and provides answers in these profit to the total fixed costs in the numera-
same terms. The overall contribution margin tor. The denominator remains the contribu-
ratio can be used to solve for the break-even tion margin per unit.
sales dollars. 11. A change in sales mix will change the con-
3. Break-even point is the level of sales activity tribution margin of the package (defined by
where total revenues equal total costs, or the sales mix), and thus will change the
where zero profits are earned. units needed to break even.
4. At the break-even point, all fixed costs are 12. Margin of safety is the sales activity in excess
covered. Above the break-even point, only of that needed to break even. The higher the
variable costs need to be covered. Thus, margin of safety, the lower the risk.
contribution margin per unit is profit per unit,
provided that the unit selling price is greater 13. Operating leverage is the use of fixed costs
than the unit variable cost (which it must be to extract higher percentage changes in prof-
for break even to be achieved). its as sales activity changes. It is achieved by
increasing fixed costs while lowering variable
5. Variable cost ratio = Variable costs/Sales costs. Therefore, increased leverage implies
Contribution margin ratio increased risk, and vice versa.
= Contribution margin/Sales 14. Sensitivity analysis is a “what-if” technique
Contribution margin ratio that examines the impact of changes in un-
= 1 – Variable cost ratio derlying assumptions on an answer. A com-
pany can input data on selling prices, varia-
6. No. The increase in contribution is $9,000 ble costs, fixed costs, and sales mix and set
(0.3 × $30,000), and the increase in advertis- up formulas to calculate break-even points
ing is $10,000. If the contribution margin ratio
and expected profits. Then, the data can be
is 0.40, then the increased contribution is
varied as desired to see what impact chang-
$12,000 (0.4 × $30,000). This is $2,000
above the increased advertising expense, so es have on the expected profit.
the increased advertising would be a good 15. A declining margin of safety means that
decision. sales are moving closer to the break-even
7. Sales mix is the relative proportion sold of point. Profit is going down, and the possibil-
each product. For example, a sales mix of ity of loss is greater. Managers should ana-
3:2 means that three units of one product lyze the reasons for the decreasing margin
are sold for every two of the second product. of safety and look for ways to increase reve-
nue and/or decrease costs.
3. Head-First Company
Contribution Margin Income Statement
For the Coming Year
Total Per Unit
Sales ($70 × 5,000 helmets).................................. $350,000 $70
Total variable expense ($49 × 5,000) ................... 245,000 49
Total contribution margin .................................... 105,000 $21
Total fixed expense............................................... 29,400
Operating income ................................................ $ 75,600
$29,400
=
($70 - $49)
= 1,400 helmets
2. Head-First Company
Contribution Margin Income Statement
At Break-Even
Total
Sales ($70 × 1,400 helmets)....................................................... $98,000
Total variable expense ($49 × 1,400) ........................................ 68,600
Total contribution margin ......................................................... 29,400
Total fixed expense.................................................................... 29,400
Operating income ...................................................................... $ 0
($70 - $49)
=
$70
= 0.30, or 30%
3. Head-First Company
Contribution Margin Income Statement
For the Coming Year
Percent
of Sales
Sales ($70 × 5,000 helmets).................................. $350,000 100%
Total variable expense ($49 × 5,000) ................... 245,000 70
Total contribution margin .................................... 105,000 30
Total fixed expense............................................... 29,400
Operating income ................................................ $ 75,600
$29,400
=
0.30
= $98,000
2. Head-First Company
Contribution Margin Income Statement
At Break-Even
Total
Sales ........................................................................................... $98,000
Total variable expense ($98,000 × 0.70) ................................... 68,600
Total contribution margin ......................................................... 29,400
Total fixed expense.................................................................... 29,400
Operating income ...................................................................... $ 0
($29,400 + $81,900)
=
($70 - $49)
= 5,300 helmets
2. Head-First Company
Contribution Margin Income Statement
At 5,300 Helmets Sold
Total
Sales ($70 × 5,300 helmets)....................................................... $371,000
Total variable expense ($49 × 5,300) ........................................ 259,700
Total contribution margin ......................................................... 111,300
Total fixed expense.................................................................... 29,400
Operating income ...................................................................... $ 81,900
($29,400 + $81,900)
=
0.30
= $371,000
2. Head-First Company
Contribution Margin Income Statement
At Sales Revenue of $371,000
Total
Sales ........................................................................................... $371,000
Total variable expense ($371,000 × 0.70) ................................. 259,700
Total contribution margin ......................................................... 111,300
Total fixed expense.................................................................... 29,400
Operating income ...................................................................... $ 81,900
1. Any package with 5 bicycle helmets for every 1 motorcycle helmet is fine; for
example, 5:1, or 10:2, or 30:6. Throughout the rest of this exercise, we will use
5:1.
Fixed cost
2. Break-even packages =
Package contribution margin
$54,600
=
$182
= 300 packages
3. Head-First Company
Contribution Margin Income Statement
At Break-Even
Total
Sales [($70 × 1,500) + ($220 × 300)] .......................................... $171,000
Total variable expense [($49 × 1,500) + ($143 × 300)] ............. 116,400
Total contribution margin ......................................................... 54,600
Total fixed expense.................................................................... 54,600
Operating income ...................................................................... $ 0
($570,000 - $388,000)
1. Contribution margin ratio =
$570,000
= 0.3193
2. Head-First Company
Contribution Margin Income Statement
At Break-Even Sales Dollars
Total
Sales ........................................................................................... $170,999
Total variable expense ($170,999 × 0.6807) ............................. 116,399
Total contribution margin ......................................................... 54,600
Total fixed expense.................................................................... 54,600
Operating income ...................................................................... $ 0
$105,000 *
=
$75,600
= 1.4
* 5,000 × ($70 - $49)
Exercise 4–12
$10.50
2. Contribution margin ratio = = 0.4375, or 43.75%
$24
$13.50
Variable cost ratio = = 0.5625, or 56.25%
$24
Exercise 4–13
$874,000
2. Break-even units = = 115,000
$7.60
Exercise 4–14
Contribution margin
1. Contribution margin ratio =
Sales
$63,000
= = 0.20, or 20%
$315,000
Fixed cost
3. Break-even sales revenue =
Contribution margin ratio
$24,150
= = $120,750
0.20
Exercise 4–16
($131,650 + $18,350)
1. Break-even units =
($2.45 - $1.65)
$150,000
=
$0.80
= 187,500
Exercise 4–17
A B C D
Sales $15,000 $15,600* $16,250* $10,600
Total variable costs 5,000 11,700 9,750 5,300*
Total contribution margin 10,000 3,900 6,500* 5,300*
Total fixed costs 9,500* 4,000 6,136* 4,452
Operating income (loss) $ 500 $ (100)* $ 364 $ 848
(Note: Calculated break-even units that include a fractional amount have been
rounded to the nearest whole unit.)
Exercise 4–19
$141,750
1. Variable cost ratio = = 0.45, or 45%
$315,000
$173,250
Contribution margin ratio = = 0.55, or 55%
$315,000
2. Because all fixed costs are covered by break even, any revenue above break
even contributes directly to operating income.
Sales Contribution margin ratio = Increased operating income
$30,000 × 0.55 = $16,500
Therefore, operating income will be $16,500 higher.
$63,000
3. Break-even sales revenue = = $114,545 (rounded to the nearest
0.55
dollar)
Exercise 4–20
1. Sales mix is 2:1 (twice as many DVDs are sold as equipment sets).
1. Sales mix is 2:1:4 (twice as many DVDs will be sold as equipment sets, and
four times as many yoga mats will be sold as equipment sets).
3. Switzer Company
Income Statement
For the Coming Year
Sales ........................................................................................... $555,000
Less: Total variable costs ......................................................... 330,000
Contribution margin ............................................................. 225,000
Less: Total fixed costs .............................................................. 118,350
Operating income ................................................................. $106,650
$225,000
Contribution margin ratio = = 0.405, or 40.5%
$555,000
$118,350
Break-even revenue = = $292,222
0.405
1. Sales mix is 3:5:1 (three times as many small basics will be sold as carved
models, and five times as many large basics will be sold as carved models).
3. Sonora Company
Income Statement
For the Coming Year
Sales ........................................................................................... $25,650,000
Less: Total variable costs ......................................................... 18,520,000
Contribution margin ............................................................. 7,130,000
Less: Total fixed costs .............................................................. 669,750
Operating income ................................................................. $ 6,460,250
$7,130,000
Contribution margin ratio = = 0.2780, or 27.80%
$25,650,00 0
$669,750
Break-even revenue = = $2,409,173
0.2780
$35,000
$30,000
Revenue and Cost
$25,000 X
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000 X
$5,000
$0
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500
Units Sold
Break-even point = 2,500 units; + line is total revenue, and X line is total cost.
$40,000
X
$35,000
$30,000
Revenue and Cost
$25,000
$20,000
$15,000 X
$10,000
$5,000
$0
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
Units Sold
$50,000
$40,000
Revenue and Cost
X
$30,000
$20,000
X
$10,000
$0
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
Units Sold
$60,000
$50,000
Revenue and Cost
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000 X
$10,000
X
$0
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
Units Sold
$70,000
$60,000
X
Revenue and Cost
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000 X
$10,000
$0
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000
Units Sold
Exercise 4–24
$486,000
1. Unit contribution margin = = $27
18,000
$540,000
Break-even units = = 20,000 units
$27
$27
3. Contribution margin ratio = = 0.45, or 45%
$60
$540,000
Break-even sales revenue = = $1,200,000
0.45
$1,833,300
1. Break-even sales dollars = = $3,160,862
0.58 *
$2,610,000
*Contribution margin ratio = = 0.58, or 58%
$4,500,000
Contribution margin
3. Degree of operating leverage =
Operating income
$2,610,000
=
$776,700
= 3.36
Exercise 4–26
$75,000
Break-even packages = = 625
$120
Break-even vases = 2 × 625 = 1,250
Break-even figurines = 1 × 625 = 625
$88,150
Break-even packages = = 410
$215
Break-even vases = 3 × 410 = 1,230
Break-even figurines = 2 × 410 = 820
Exercise 4–27
$6,720,000
1. a. Variable cost per unit = = $19.20
350,000
$1,680,000
b. Contribution margin per unit = = $4.80
350,000
$4.80
c. Contribution margin ratio = = 0.20, or 20%
$24.00
$1,512,000
d. Break-even units = = 315,000
$4.80
$1,512,000
e. Break-even sales dollars = = $7,560,000
0.20
OR
Break-even sales dollars = 315,000 × $24 = $7,560,000
($1,512,000 + $300,000)
2. Units for target income = = 377,500
$4.80
$1,680,000
5. Degree of operating leverage = = 10.0
$168,000
Problem 4–28
Fixed cost
1. Break-even units =
(Price - Unit variable cost)
$1,792,000
=
$20
= 89,600 units
$3,392,000
=
$20
= 169,600 units
$20
3. Contribution margin ratio = = 0.40
$50
Fixed cost
1. Break-even units =
(Price - Unit variable cost)
$96,000
=
($10 - $5)
= 19,200 units
($96,000 - $13,500)
2. Break-even units =
($10 - $5)
= 16,500 units
3. The reduction in fixed costs reduces the break-even point because less con-
tribution margin is needed to cover the new, lower fixed costs. Operating in-
come goes up, and the margin of safety also goes up.
Problem 4–30
$5,760,000
1. Unit contribution margin = = $15
384,000
$3,000,000
Break-even point = = 200,000 units
$15
$15
Contribution margin ratio = = 0.3
$50
$3,000,000
Break-even sales = = $10,000,000
0.3
OR
= $50 × 200,000 = $10,000,000
$5,760,000
6. = 2.09 (operating leverage)
$2,760,000
20% × 2.09 = 41.8% (profit increase)
Problem 4–31
1. Sales mix:
$300,000
Squares: = 10,000 units
$30
$2,500,000
Circles: = 50,000 units
$50
$100,000
* = $10
10,000
$500,000
= $10
50,000
$1,628,000
Break-even packages = = 7,400 packages
$220
Break-even squares = 7,400 × 1 = 7,400
Break-even circles = 7,400 × 5 = 37,000
2. New mix:
Variable Contribution Sales Total
Product Price – Cost = Margin × Mix = CM
Squares $30 $10 $20 3 $ 60
Circles 50 10 40 5 200
Package $260
$1,628,000
Break-even packages = = 6,262 packages
$260
Break-even squares = 6,262 × 3 = 18,786
Break-even circles = 6,262 × 5 = 31,310
Kenno would gain $55,000 by increasing advertising for the squares. This
is a good strategy.
Problem 4–32
$58,500
1. Break-even units = = 650,000
($0.36 - $0.27)
Margin of safety in units = 830,000 – 650,000 = 180,000
($58,500 + $36,000)
3. Units for target profit =
($0.36 - $0.27)
= 1,050,000
Problem 4–33
$302,616
1. Contribution margin ratio = = 0.54, or 54%
$560,400
$150,000
2. Break-even revenue = = $277,778
0.54
$332,878
Contribution margin ratio = = 0.54
$616,440
$285,804
New contribution margin ratio = = 0.51
$560,400
$150,000
Break-even revenue = = $294,118
0.51
The effect is to increase the break-even revenue.
Problem 4–34
Fixed cost
1. Revenue =
(1 - Variable rate)
$150,000
=
(1/3)
= $450,000
$360,000
= 12,000 units
$30
$240,000
= 12,000 units
$20
Thus, the sales mix is 1:1.
$150,000
=
$16.67
= 8,998 packages
Contribution margin
3. Operating leverage =
Operating income
$200,000
=
$50,000
= 4.0
Problem 4–35
2. Contribution margin:
($3 × 20,000) + ($3 × 40,000) $180,000
Less: Fixed costs 146,000
Operating income $ 34,000
$300,000
1. Break-even units = = 21,429
$14*
$406,000
* = $14
29,000
$1,218,000
** = $42
29,000
2. Margin of safety = $1,218,000 – $900,000 = $318,000
Variable costs
1. Variable cost ratio =
Sales
$353,400
= = 0.38, or 38%
$930,000
(Sales - Variable costs)
Contribution margin ratio =
Sales
($930,000 - $353,400)
=
$930,000
= 0.62, or 62%
$310,000
2. Break-even sales revenue = = $500,000
0.62
Problem 4–38
$160,000
2. = 128,000
($3.50 - Unit variable cost)
Unit variable cost = $2.25
($32,300 + $12,500)
2. Break-even in units = = 32,000 boxes
$1.40
Break-even in sales = 32,000 × $5.60 = $179,200
OR
($32,300 + $12,500)
= = $179,200
0.25
$44,800
5. Break-even in units = = 22,400 boxes
($6.20 - $4.20)
New operating income = $6.20(31,500) – $4.20(31,500) – $44,800
= $195,300 – $132,300 – $44,800 = $18,200
Yes, operating income will increase by $14,000 ($18,200 – $4,200).
Problem 4–40
$100,000
1. Company A: =2
$50,000
$300,000
Company B: =6
$50,000
2. Company A Company B
$50,000 $250,000
X= X=
(1 - 0.8) (1 - 0.4)
$50,000 $250,000
X= X=
0.2 0.6
X = $250,000 X = $416,667
Company B must sell more than Company A to break even because it must
cover $200,000 more in fixed costs (it is more highly leveraged).
The percentage increase in profits for Company B is much higher than Com-
pany A’s increase because Company B has a higher degree of operating lev-
erage (i.e., it has a larger amount of fixed costs in proportion to variable costs
as compared to Company A). Once fixed costs are covered, additional revenue
must cover only variable costs, and 60 percent of Company B’s revenue above
break even is profit, whereas only 20 percent of Company A’s revenue above
break even is profit.
Problem 4-41
Variable
Target units are calculated by taking the fixed costs plus the target pre-tax
profit divided by the contribution margin per package and then calculating the
number of each unit in a package.
Revenue $7,940,000
Less: Variable costs 5,558,000
Contribution $2,382,000
Revised contribution
$23,910
May of current year = = 0.549, or 54.9%
$43,560
$23,400
May of prior year = = 0.561, or 56.1%
$41,700
$20,330
May of current year = = $37,031
0.549
$13,800
May of prior year = = $24,599
0.561
4. Clearly, the sharp rise in fixed costs from the prior year to the current year has
had a strong impact on the break-even point and the margin of safety. Bisson-
ette will need to ensure that tight cost control is exercised since the margin of
safety is much slimmer. Still, the decision to go with the OEM investment pro-
gram could pay large dividends in the future. Note that the margin of safety
and break-even point give the company important information on the potential
risk of the venture but do not tell it the upside potential.
b. $440,000 / $1.60
= 275,000 boxes
d. CM = $4 - $2.70 = $1.30
CM ratio = $1.30 / $4 = 32.5%
Desired operating income = $110,400 / .6 = $184,000
Case 4–45
1. Let X be a package of 3 Grade I cabinets and 7 Grade II cabinets.
0.3X($3,400) + 0.7X($1,600) = $1,600,000
X = 748 packages
Grade I: 0.3 × 748 = 224 units
Grade II: 0.7 × 748 = 524 units
$225,000
= 56 packages
$4,046
Grade I: 3 × 56 = 168
Grade II: 7 × 56 = 392
Effect on profits:
Change in contribution margin:
$714(260 – 141) – $272(329 – 260) $66,198
Increase in fixed costs:
$70,000(7/12) 40,833
Increase in operating income $25,365
Fixed cost
X =
(Price - Variable cost)
$295,000
=
$986
= 299 packages (or 299 of each cabinet)
The break-even point is computed as follows:
($295,000 - $118,102)
X =
$986
$176,898
=
$986
= 179 packages (179 of each)
To this, add the units already sold, yielding the revised break-even point:
I: 83 + 179 = 262
II: 195 + 179 = 374
Jackets
Revenue to achieve target = profit fixed costs plus pre-tax target / Contribution
margin %
Units: 54,905 t-shirts (10,981 x 5); 32,943 sweatshirts (10,981 x 3); 21,962 fleece
(10,981 x 2).
Units: 73,105 t-shirts (14,641 x 5); 43,863 sweatshirts (14,641 x 3); 29,242 fleece
(14,641 x 2).
Case 4–47
Fixed expense
1. Break-even point =
(Price-Variable cost)
$100,000
First process: = 5,000 cases
($30 - $10)
$200,000
Second process: = 8,333 cases
($30 - $6)
The manual process is more profitable if sales are less than 25,000 cases; the
automated process is more profitable at a level greater than 25,000 cases. It is
important for the manager to have a sales forecast to help in deciding which
process should be chosen.
3. The right to decide which process should be chosen belongs to the divisional
manager. Donna has an ethical obligation to report the correct information to
her superior. By altering the sales forecast, Donna unfairly and unethically in-
fluenced the decision-making process. Managers certainly have a moral obli-
gation to assess the impact of their decisions on employees, and every effort
should be taken to be fair and honest with employees. Donna’s behaviour,
however, is not justified by the fact that it helped a number of employees re-
tain their employment. First, Donna had no right to make that decision. Donna
certainly has the right to voice her concerns about the impact of automation
on the employees’ well-being. In so doing, perhaps the divisional manager
would come to the same conclusion, even though the automated system ap-
pears to be more profitable. Second, the choice to select the manual system
may not be the best for the employees anyway. The divisional manager may
possess more information, making the selection of the automated system the
best alternative for all concerned, provided the sales volume justifies its selec-
tion. For example, if the automated system is viable, the divisional manager
may have plans to retrain and relocate the displaced workers in better jobs
within the company. Third, her motivation for altering the forecast seems more
driven by her friendship with Hussan Khalil than any legitimate concerns for
the layoff of other employees. Donna should examine her reasoning carefully
to assess the real reasons for her behaviour. Perhaps in so doing, the conflict
of interest that underlies her decision will become apparent.