Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ncbi
Ncbi
Key words: aplastic anemia, survival, incidence, mortality, risk factors. *the Catalan Group for the Study of
Agranulocytosis and Aplastic Anemia:
Antoni Julià, Salut Brunet, Ramón
Montané E, Ibáñez L, Vidal X, Ballarin E, Puig R, García N, Laporte JR, and the Catalan Group for Ayats, Carles Besses, Encarnación
the Study of Agranulocytosis and Aplastic Anemia. Epidemiology of aplastic anemia: a prospec- Pérez Vila, Alba Bosch, Alicia
tive multicenter study. Haematologica 2008 Apr; 93(4):518-523. Domingo, Esther Alonso, Esmeralda
doi: 10.3324/haematol.12020 de la Banda, Javier Estella, Teresa
Toll, Marta García, Ramón López,
©2008 Ferrata Storti Foundation. This is an open-access paper. Fuensanta Millà, Tomás Navarro,
Benet Nomdedeu, Jordi Esteve,
Teresa Olivé, Joan Peris, Antoni
Pineda, Imma Roig, Alfons Soler,
Rafael Soto, Isabel de Diego.
1.0 1.0
A B
Cumulative survival probability
0.8 0.8
1990-1999
0.6 0.6
1980-1989
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0 6 12 18 24 0 6 12 18 24
Time since diagnosis (months) Time since diagnosis (months)
1.0 C 1.0 D
Moderate
Cumulative survival probability
0.8 0.8
Severe Immunosuppression
0.6 0.6
Very severe
0.4 No treatment
0.4
Anabolic agents androgens
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0 6 12 18 24 0 6 12 18 24
Time since diagnosis (months) Time since diagnosis (months)
Figure 2. A. Effect of the year of diagnosis of aplastic anemia on cumulative survival probability. B. Effect of patients’ age on cumula-
tive survival probability. C. Effect of the severity of aplastic anemia on cumulative survival probability. D. Effect of treatment of aplastic
anemia on cumulative survival probability.
ological variability in the ascertainment of cases and diag- years of the study period to 31% in the last 10 years.
nostic criteria, although they could also be related to sev- The prognosis of patients with aplastic anemia has been
eral factors such as genetic background and varying expo- related to several factors.1 In addition to the period of diag-
sure to environmental factors. nosis, the only factors that predicted survival were age and
We did not find any marked differences in the incidence disease severity. The age-dependent survival rate in our
of aplastic anemia by sex, and we recorded a bimodal age study is in agreement with data from the International
incidence. This is in agreement with the results of several Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry13,25 and with the
population-based studies.6,8 However, the IAAAS reported findings of the IAAAS.8 There were no statistical differ-
a somewhat higher incidence among females (2.3 per mil- ences in survival at 2 years according to the type of treat-
lion per year ) than among males (1.7 per million per year).8 ment received. However, most patients received immuno-
Moreover, in Thailand male cases were almost twice as suppressive therapy and the number of patients treated
frequent as female cases, and it was found that aplastic with other therapies was small. Bone marrow transplanta-
anemia was mainly a disease of young adults: a peak was tion and immunosuppression have specific advantages and
observed among subjects 15-24 years old and the inci- drawbacks but produce similar long-term survival rates.1
dence in this age group was almost 4-fold higher than that
in Europe and Israel. An environmental etiology was sug-
gested.12
In our study, more than two thirds of cases were diag- Table 2. Factors associated with death at 2 years after diagnosis.
nosed as having severe or very severe disease. This propor-
tion is similar to that found in other studies.6,19 The propor- Hazard ratio 95% confidence
tion of severe cases at the time of diagnosis decreased interval
throughout the study period, probably due to earlier diag-
Age (years)
nosis. 2-14 1*
The survival curves in aplastic anemia were biphasic, 15-24 1.34 0.33-5.37
i.e., rapid early mortality followed by a much slower 25-44 1.22 0.27-5.51
45-64 3.41 0.97-11.91
decline. Survival rates fell from 73% at 3 months to 57% ≥65 5.50 1.56-19.02
at 2 years, and remained 51% at 15 years. Survival figures
from several series have shown the same biphasic curves, Disease severity
Moderate 1*
with the highest mortality rates within the first 6 months Severe 4.57 1.06-19.73
after diagnosis.20-22 Five-year survival rates have been Very severe 6.31 1.49-26.78
described to range from 70% to 90% and to be similar
Year of diagnosis
among patients treated with either bone marrow trans- 1990-1999 1*
plantation or immunosuppression.24 In the early 1930s 1980-1989 1.68 0.95-2.97
aplastic anemia was considered almost inevitably fatal.
Treatment
However, the morbidity and mortality of this disease have None 1*
decreased dramatically since the introduction of bone mar- Bone marrow transplantation 0.47 0.11-2.12
row transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy.24 In Immunosupressive drugs 0.72 0.30-1.78
Androgens 1.30 0.45-3.72
our study, the overall case fatality rate was 41% at 2 years
after diagnosis, but it decreased from 50.5% in the first 10 *Reference category.
Table 3. Case fatality rate and mortality at 2 years after diagnosis in patients with aplastic anemia according to patients’ age.
Age (years) Number of Number of Case 95% CI Overall case 95% CI Mortality 95% CI
cases deaths fatality rate (%)a fatality rate (%)b (n/million inhabitants-year)
It is also worth mentioning that one third of the cases disease is high. The incidence and survival rates were sim-
were exposed to drugs or toxic agents known to be asso- ilar to those in other European countries. Factors associat-
ciated with the disease. ed with death at 2 years after diagnosis were age over 45 at
Three major population-based studies of aplastic ane- diagnosis, and very severe initial aplastic anemia. In addi-
mia have been reported; the IAAAS, the French tion, the fatality rate of cases diagnosed during the 1980s
Cooperative Group Study, and the Thai Aplastic Anemia was higher than that in cases diagnosed in the 1990s.
Study.6,8,12 We used identical methods to those of the Further studies are needed to explore the role of risk factors
IAAAS and Thai studies. However, in contrast to these on the prognosis, and the relevance of exposure to various
previous studies, cases were recruited and followed-up chemicals, viruses and drugs as possible etiological factors.
over a longer period of time. The incidence figures are fair-
ly reliable since all the important hospitals in the region
participated, and efforts were made to include all the cases
Authorship and Disclosures
prospectively through close contact with hematologists. It
is, therefore, unlikely that we missed a significant propor-
EM: analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the
tion of cases. Although diagnostic methods have
improved recently, the incidence rates remained stable article and final approval of the version to be published;
over the study period. LI: conception, design and interpretation of data; drafting
One of the limitations of our study is that we obtained the article and final approval; XV: analysis and interpreta-
the follow-up information from clinical records. As a tion of data, revising the article and final approval; EB:
result we could have missed some information when acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; revising
clinical records could not been found, as happened for 21 the article and final approval; RP: analysis and interpreta-
patients (11%). tion of data; revising the article and approval of the final
In conclusion, the present study shows that aplastic ane- version; JRL: conception, design and interpretation of
mia is a rare disease. Although the prognosis has improved data; revising the article and approval of the final version.
significantly, the mortality rate among patients with this The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.