PROJECT NAME:

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

As Per IS 2720 Part IV

Type of Material: Subgrade soil Date of testing: 17/1/2019

Material Source: CH: 0+520 RIGHT SIDE

Weight of sample taken before washing, gms = 580 gms

Weight of sample after washing, gms = 223.9 gms

Wt. of Material Percent Cumulative Percent Percent Passing
IS Sieve Size (mm)
Retained (gm) Retained (%) Retained (%) or Finer (%)
10.000 10.1 1.74 1.74 98.26
4.750 12.2 2.10 3.84 96.16
2.360 25.8 4.45 8.29 91.71
1.180 28.9 4.98 13.28 86.72
0.600 40.3 6.95 20.22 79.78
0.425 41.5 7.16 27.38 72.62
0.212 42.3 7.29 34.67 65.33
0.150 59.3 10.22 44.90 55.10
0.075 95.7 16.50 61.40 38.60

100.00
10 98.26 Gravel
Percent Finer, %

90.00
4.75 96.16 2 ###
80.00
2.36 91.71 10 ###
70.00
1.18 86.72 2 0
60.00
0.6 79.78 2 ###
50.00
0.425 72.62 Sand

0.15 55.10 0.06 #REF! 40.00

0.075 38.60 10 #REF! 30.00

0.01 0 0.06 0 20.00

0.06 #REF! 10.00

0.00
Seive Size, mm
0.01 0.1 1 10

Figure: Graphical Representation of Grain Size Distribution

Result:
From the figure for the tested sample, Gravel Content is 3.84 %
Sand Content is ### %
Silt and Clay Content is ### %
PROJECT NAME:

ATTERBERG LIMIT TEST

As Per IS 2720 Part V

Type of Material:Subgrade soil Date of testing:19/1/2019

Material Source:CH: 0+520 RIGHT SIDE

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

Sl.No Particulars Unit
I II III IV I II III
1 Number of Blows No's 11 20 31 45
2 Cup Number No's 201 202 203 204
3 Weight of Empty Cup gm 11.07 11.25 11.39 11.65
4 Weight of Cup + Wet Soil gm 25.02 25.12 23.21 23.85
5 Weight of Cup + Dry Soil gm 21.25 22.22 21.12 21.89
6 Weight of Dry Soil gm 10.18 10.97 9.73 10.24
7 Moisture Content % 37.03 26.44 21.48 19.14
Average PL
Moisture Content, %

40.00
25 0
35.00
25 24.8

30.00

10 24.8
25.00
25 24.8
20.00

15.00

10.00

5.00
1 No. of Blows
10 100

Graphical Representation of No.of Blows-Moisture Content Relationship

Result:
Liquid Limit (moisture content corresponding to 25 blows in the above fig), LL = 24.8 %
Plastic Limit (average value of moisture content ifrom the table), PL = NP
Plasticity Index (LL-PI), PI = NP
PROJECT NAME:

MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY TEST RESULT

As Per IS 2720 Part VIII

Type of MaterialEmbankment/Subgrade soil Date of testing: 23/1/2019

Material SourceCH: 0+520 RIGHT SIDE

Sl.No Particulars Unit I II III IV V

Determination of Bulk Density of Soil
1 Volume of Mould cm3 978 978 978 978 978
2 Weight of Empty Mould gm 4329 4329 4329 4329 4329
3 Weight of Mould + Compacted Soil gm 6330 6424 6480 6469 6443
4 Weight of Compacted Soil gm 2001 2095 2151 2140 2114
5 Weight Density (w/v) gm/cm3 2.046 2.142 2.199 2.188 2.162
Determination of Moisture Content and Dry Density of Soil
6 Cup Number 31 32 33 34 35
7 Weight of Empty Cup gm 12.03 12.34 12.64 11.89 11.97
8 Weight of Cup + Wet Soil gm 64.21 65.00 64.80 64.16 64.32
9 Weight of Cup + Dry Soil gm 61.23 61.05 60.04 58.62 58.06
10 Weight of Dry Soil gm 49.20 48.71 47.40 46.73 46.09
11 Moisture Content % 6.06 8.11 10.04 11.86 13.58
12 Dry Density gm/cm3 1.929 1.981 1.999 1.956 1.903
Dry density, gm/cm3

2.050

2.025

0 2
2.000
9.9 2
1.975
9.9 0
1.950 9.9 2

1.925

1.900

1.875

1.850
5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00
Moisture Content, %

Graphical Representation of Density-Moisture Content Relationship

Result: From the above figure,

Maximum Dry Density, MDD = 2.000 gm/cm3
Optimum Moisture Content OMC = 9.90 %
PROJECT NAME:

CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST

As Per IS 2720 Part XVI

Type of MaterialEmbankment/Subgrade soil Date of testing: 28/1/2019

Material Source:CH: 0+520 RIGHT SIDE
Lab. MDD 2.000 gm/cm3
Lab. OMC 9.90 %

Sl.No Particulars Unit Mould 1Mould 2 Mould 3

Determination of Bulk Density of Soil
1 Volume of Mould cm3 2158 2185 2154
2 Weight of Empty Mould gm 6831 6855 6852
3 Weight of Mould + Compacted Soil gm 11429 11518 11441 Remarks All the
4 Weight of Compacted Soil gm 4598 4663 4589 three mould
5 Weight Density (w/v) gm/cm3 2.131 2.134 2.130 specimen has been
compacted to 97%
Determination of Moisture Content and Dry Density of Soil
of MDD/OMC
6 Cup Number 61 62 63 obtained from
7 Weight of Empty Cup gm 13.13 12.35 12.02 Modified Procter
8 Weight of Cup + Wet Soil gm 63.27 62.46 63.85 Density Test
9 Weight of Cup + Dry Soil gm 58.76 57.95 59.19
10 Weight of Dry Soil gm 45.63 45.60 47.17
11 Moisture Content % 9.88 9.89 9.88
12 Dry Density gm/cm3 1.939 1.942 1.939
P ro v in g R in g R e a d in g , D iv is io n s

Mould 1 Mould 2 Mould 3 Average

Proving Proving Proving Proving
Penetration Ring Ring Ring Ring
mm Readin Readin Readin Readin
g g g g
0.0 0 0 0 0.0 80.0

0.5 7 8 9 8.0 70.0

0 34
1.0 15 16 16 15.7 2.5 34
60.0
1.5 22 23 23 22.7 2.5 0
2.0 28 27 29 28.0 50.0 2.5 34
2.5 33 35 34 34.0
40.0
3.0 39 40 38 39.0 0 50
4.0 45 46 45 45.3 30.0 5 50
5.0 49 51 50 50.0 5 0
20.0
7.5 59 58 59 58.7 5 50
10.0 67 67 66 66.7 10.0

12.5 72 75 77 74.7 0.0

0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5
Penetration, mm
RESULT:
From the above figure PRR Load CBR Thus Soaked CBR value
At 2.5 mm penrtration 34.0 156 11.4 of the material tested
At 5.0 mm penrtration 50.0 230 11.2 is 11.4%.