Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Methods of Research Chapter1-3
Methods of Research Chapter1-3
Submitted by:
Submitted to:
Tanauan, Batangas
No. of Pages :
Introduction
It is a common knowledge that parents are the ones who brought the children
in life. They are the ones who reproduce a human kind in a certain society, as in this
way they contribute to the development of the human history. Parents are one of the
direct holder of educational work to their children.
The parents take a crucial stand, when it comes to their children’s development
and education as whole, as the parents themselves are the ones to take care on the
overall children physical and intellectual development, till the point they get
independent and ready to face the challenges of the society they live in. Parents are
aware of the work on the development of children, but at the same time they need
pedagogical information on the right to education of their children. (Mojsovsja Koteva
Tatjana. 2006)
Parents involvement has been a very essential component of every teacher-
student- school academic endeavor. Parents are considered as one of the
stakeholders of the school community and they play a tremendous roles in the child’s
educational and environmental transformation. Thus, we have to realize the intensity
or extent of their participation or involvement in their child’s education and school.
Most parents, whose children are currently enrolled in a particular school, are
usually active to assist in their child’s classroom, communicating constantly with their
child’s teachers, assisting with their homework, getting involved with school projects,
and discussing their child’s academic strengths and weaknesses with teachers.
Unfortunately, there are some parents who are quite passive in their child’s education.
Some of them are not directly involved. Neither are they visible in the school premises
and get involved in the desired goals of the school where their children are getting
what they need most in life.
When parents involve themselves in the education process of their children,
usually the outcome can be qualified as a positive and encouraging one. In this regard,
they are usually connected and act under their own parental attitudes, which are
transmitted through their demonstration of mutual confidentiality regarding the
children’s capabilities and their overall learning capacity which leads them towards
succeeding over the learning, education as a complex process. Therefore, parents
should get involved in supporting their children in doing their homework, as in this way
they offer their parental support as one of the key strategies leading towards a
successful education of their children at school.
Parents involvement towards their children’s learning not only improves a
child’s morale, attitude, and academic performance in different subject areas, but it
also promotes a better behavior and social adjustment and adaptation. Family
involvement in education helps children to grow up to be functional, productive and
responsible members of the society. It only means that if we involve the parents in
educating their children, it is close to saying that the school is proactive in
implementing innovations or development among the students. As parent’s
involvement increased, teachers and school administrators also raise the chance to
realize quality reform in education.
Most school have programs designed to intensify the parental involvement such
as boys and girls scouting, school- community socio-economic project-s, disaster
volunteer task force, and school- community work brigade like the program called
“Brigada Eskwela”. However, increasing parental involvement remains a challenge
among school administrators and teachers despite their programs and efforts.
The study will investigate the importance, benefits, barriers and extent of
parental involvement in school performance of high school students in Nova Schola
located at Tanauan, Batangas.
student?
performance of students?
Hypotheses
The hypotheses were formulated and to be tested.
Chapter 2
Review of Related Literature
This chapter presents the related literature and studies which were reviewed to
give a deeper insight to the problem that will be investigated.
Related Literature
The concepts on home and school relationship as well as parental involvement in
the education of their children are given in this section.
Foreign
Parents and extended families have the most direct and lasting impact on
children's learning and play a key role in supporting their education. Research shows
that when parents are involved in their children’s education, children are more
engaged with their school work, stay in school longer, and achieve better learning
outcomes. This also translates into longer-term economic and social benefits. Even
though the role of a parent in their children’s education evolves as children get older,
it’s important to remember that parents remain role models. Their attitudes towards
education can both inspire children and empower them as they go through their own
educational journey. Educators believes that parents should be actively involved in
their children’s education, and be part of efforts of ensuring that all children receive a
quality education.
Parents have as much responsibility for their children’s education as teachers
do. It should be a collaborative effort because education is not something that only
children’s education shed some light on the impact parents can have regarding the
level of involvement in their children’s education. The study, which formed the basis
Vhembe District, examined the level of input parents showed and the effects thereof.
There are some cited benefits of parental involvement in their children’s education.
more intensively involved the parents are, the greater the positive impact on academic
behavior of a child. It not only enhances academic performance, but also has a positive
encouragement of his or her child’s education can affect the child’s attitude towards
involvement also lifts the morale of a teacher. Schools and teachers benefit from
parental involvement because involved parents develop a greater appreciation for the
challenges that teachers face in the classroom. Communication between home and
school helps a teacher to know a learner better, which in turn allows the teacher to
teach the learner more effectively. Communication also helps to dispel any mistrust or
of making a contribution to their children’s education and future. They have a better
understanding of the school curriculum and activities, and can be more comfortable
with the quality of education that their child is receiving. They spend more time with
their children and are able to communicate better with them. Some studies show that
a parent’s participation in a child’s education may inspire the parent to further his or
whose parents are more involved in their education have higher levels of academic
performance than children whose parents are involved to a lesser degree. The
influence of parent involvement on academic success has not only been noted among
researchers, but also among policy makers who have integrated efforts aimed at
increasing parent involvement into broader educational policy initiatives. Coupled with
success has been found to be relatively stable after early elementary school
(Pedersen, Faucher, & Eaton, 1978). Therefore, it is important to examine factors that
parenting practices that are amenable to change, such as parent involvement, and the
specific mechanisms through which parent involvement exerts its influence on a child's
academic performance are not yet fully understood (Hill & Craft, 2003). Understanding
these mechanisms would inform further research and policy initiatives and may lead
Parent involvement has been defined and measured in multiple ways, including
activities that parents engage in at home and at school and positive attitudes parents
have towards their child's education, school, and teacher (Epstein, 1996). The
distinction between the activities parents partake in and the attitude parents have
towards education was highlighted by several recent studies. Several studies found
that increased frequency of activities was associated with higher levels of child
misbehavior in the classroom (Izzo, Weissberg, Kasprow, & Fendrich, 1999), whereas
positive attitudes towards education and school were associated with the child's
achievement, as increased contacts may have occurred to help the teacher manage
the child's existing behavior problems (Izzo et al. 1999). The significance of parent
attitudes toward education and school is less well understood, although attitudes are
believed to comprise a key dimension of the relationship between parents and school
(Eccles & Harold, 1996). Parents convey attitudes about education to their children
during out-of-school hours and these attitudes are reflected in the child's classroom
behavior and in the teacher's relationship with the child and the parents.
report card grades. Standardized achievement tests are objective instruments that
assess skills and abilities children learn through direct instruction in a variety of subject
areas including reading, mathematics, and writing (Sattler, 2001). Teacher rating
scales allow teachers to rate the accuracy of the child's academic work compared to
other children in the class, and allow for ratings on a wider range of academic tasks
than examined on standardized achievement tests (DuPaul & Rapport, 1991). Report
card grades allow teachers to report on classroom academic performance, but are
used by few studies for early elementary school children due to, among other reasons,
a lack of a standardized grading system and uniform subject areas children are
evaluated on.
positive attitude towards their child's education, school, and teacher are able to
being engaged with the child to increase the child's self-perception of cognitive
competence and (b) by being engaged with the teacher and school to promote a
competence as defined as the extent to which children believe that they possess the
reading, writing, and arithmetic (Harter & Pike, 1984). Previous research found
relationship has been defined as the teacher's perception that his or her relationship
with the child is characterized by closeness and a lack of dependency and conflict
(Birch & Ladd, 1997). Closeness is the degree of warmth and open communication
between the student and teacher, dependency is the over-reliance on the teacher as
(Birch & Ladd, 1997). Previous research found that close, positive student-teacher
relationships are positively related to a wide range of child social and academic
outcomes in school (Hughes, Gleason, & Zhang, 2005). Specifically, a close student-
(Birch & Ladd, 1997; Hamre & Pianta, 2001). Previous research has also found that
student-teacher relationship (Hill & Craft, 2003; Stevenson & Baker, 1987). Therefore,
the student-teacher relationship was examined for its ability to explain the relation
and home-based involvement (e.g. homework help and engaging their children in
interest in their own education (Pomerantz, 2007; Hornby & Lafaele, 2011). While
parental involvement in students’ education has long been known to be effective and
is encouraged by both the literature and policy, consistent parental involvement has
not yet been achieved.
Zealand based on six key factors found by the Education Review Office external
evaluation of over two hundred schools. They claim that historically parental
involvement is well entrenched in the New Zealand schooling system, but that an
social and economic reforms, and changes in technology have all influenced parental
partnerships with schools, however there are still gaps in having consistent
involvement of families in education. It is not just how the school went about engaging
parents, but also the spirit in which that engagement was sought that led to successful
and effective communication. Six factors were found to influence the contributions of
parents to the school: Vision and commitment from school leaders, time and energy
invested in building relationships, the clear expectation that partnership was in the
strategies. Where these partnerships were fostered and working well, the report claims
there were many benefits to students, including maximized learning time, and a
positive atmosphere to the school. However, other than suggesting that school policy
needs to reflect the desire to work within these key factors, the report does not suggest
suggested that home-based involvement was no less for minority families than for
other families, but that it was in the area of school-based involvement that participation
was lacking.
child-rearing practices, and lack of social networks. However, Kim argues that these
are all individual barriers and that it is the school system that creates a barrier for
minority parents to become involved in schooling. Attitudes of the school are often a
barrier, with Kim suggesting that negative attitudes towards the capacity of minority
programs and school policies and leadership all play a role in influencing the
influence parental involvement, these barriers are time consuming to break down and
removing school barriers to parental involvement are more within the realm of what is
achievable for the schools. The biggest change suggested by Kim is that of school
policy, emphasizing family involvement in the school and administrative support for
Barriers also exist for parents with mental and/or physical disabilities. Stalker,
Brunner, Maguire and Mitchell in 2009 conducted a study of 24 parents with disabilities
in Britain, chronicling their experiences and both barriers and positive actions by their
education. Disabled parents involved in the study said they were often perceived as
lacking parenting skills and often not consulted about policies or services, and that
schools often did not see it as their duty to involve disabled parents. While physical
accessibility was an issue for some parents, the overwhelming majority spoke of the
perceptions of the school and its staff as being the biggest barrier. The investigation
concluded that there was an “urgent need for local authorities to implement disability
for all staff. Knowledge of a parent’s disability was at the forefront of the solution, but
no conclusion was made as to the best method of obtaining such information or how
many within the school should or needed to know. Suggestion was also made for
parents to inform the schools of support they would require in order to be involved in
their child’s schooling (eg. accessibility, Braille books sent home alongside reading
books), and parents appreciated a flexible, pro-active approach on the schools part.
The parents studied indicated that they were more likely to disclose their disability if
Many of the other articles investigated determined that school policy is at the
but, as Hornby and Lafaele in 2011 determine in their article, there is considerable
variation between rhetoric and reality in parental involvement. Simply changing policy
is unlikely to involve more parents in schools unless those policy changes are backed
up with action. The gap between rhetoric and reality is due to factors at the parent and
family, child, parent-teacher, and societal levels acting as barriers. Individual parent
and family factors include parents’ beliefs about parental involvement; if parents
believe their only responsibility is to get their child to school, they are unlikely to ever
become involved in their child’s education. Similarly, if parents doubt their ability to
help children, for example due to low-levels of parental education, they are also
unlikely to involve themselves in the school community. Parents need to feel that their
involvement is valued by schools, and therefore prefer to be invited to help rather than
volunteer. More practical considerations such as parents who work full time or have
large families may find time is a barrier to their involvement in the school community.
Class, ethnicity and gender also can act as barriers, with white middle class
tends to decline. This is in part due to children finding their independence and being
less interested in having their parents involved in their lives, however at older ages
children still desire their parents to be involved in things such as homework. Children
who struggle with school are more likely to have their parents involved in their
education as this is often sought by the school. Similarly, students who are doing well
at school are likely to have more involved parents as their involvement is a pleasure.
Conversely, those with children with behavioral challenges are less likely to be
involved. Common goals and agendas between teachers and parents are more likely
parents are more often focused on improving their children’s performance. Attitudes
to the relationship between education and schooling also play a part, where parents
who believe most of their child’s education comes from schooling being less likely to
be involved in their child’s education. Historical attitudes to parental involvement,
level contradicting information, such as a push for parental involvement while policy
leans towards competition rather than collaboration, can hinder parental involvement.
With little or no funding given to schools for the development of parental involvement,
the political push for parental involvement appears to be nothing more than talk.
that was effective in students’ education. While they acknowledge that educational
policy has a key goal for increasing parental involvement, they focused on how
effective parental involvement was in education. While Pomerantz and Moorman claim
life, home-based parental involvement was a different matter. While indirect parental
involvement at home (e.g. reading with their children) also had a positive effect, the
such as homework, was less clear. Several studies actually concluded the more
parents were involved in their children’s homework, the less well students were
performing at school. However one study showed that once the children’s performance
was monitored, their level of achievement increased with persistent homework help.
Other studies determined that there was no added benefit of parents helping with
homework. That the usefulness of parental help in the home with school based
activities is doubtful is of concern, as this is where the majority of parents are involved
Experts have repeatedly explained that parents are the crucial link in improving
Philippine education, and school simply have to do a better job of reaching out to them.
Although many parents may not be certain on how to help their children with
school works, with guidance and support they can become actively involved in their
Many studies have revealed that the parental involvement improves the
chances of student’s success at school, yet research also suggests that parental
Many researchers asserted that student achievement represents more than just
the grades. Student’s attitude, school attendance and the drop-out rate are all
In the Philippines, a developing country with high rates of poverty and input
deficit in basic education, school dropout rates are high especially among the poor.
Given that many children from disadvantaged backgrounds do not get enough support
(PIDS, 2012) and many parents are not equipped with skills to support their children’s
education, it is essential to investigate how Filipino parents can help and contribute to
and meeting familial obligations are highly valued and are taught to children at an early
age. Hiya (shame) and utang na loob (debt of gratitude) are also pivotal values in the
Filipino culture. With these values, children are expected to care for their aging
parents, as a way to pay the parents back for rearing them. Traditional Filipino
parenting roles are distinct for mothers and fathers (Alampay & Jocson, 2011). Fathers
serve as the protector and primary financial provider of the family (“haligi ng tahanan”
or “pillar of the home”) whereas mothers are considered the primary caregiver in the
everyday needs, discipline, and school management. In all, Filipino parents are
Yacat, & Francisco, 2001), and one of the Filipino family’s primary and important
functions is to educate the children (Reyes & Resurreccion, 2015). Filipino parents
view education not only as an investment for their children, but also for the whole
value education as a way of fulfilling familial obligations (Reyes & Galang, 2009).
Reyes and Galang in 2009, said that parents and family contribute positively to
In 2014, Blair’s findings revealed that middle- and high- income Filipino parents
preliminary study, using univariate analyses, found that Filipino parents always remind
their children’s first teacher, especially in learning how to read. Given that children
from disadvantaged backgrounds do not get enough support (PIDS, 2012) and many
parents are not equipped with skills to support their children’s education, it is essential
to investigate this topic and explore how Filipino parents can help and contribute to
National Statistics Office, lack of personal interest in school and the high cost of 21
education are the top two reasons why Filipino youth do not attend school. Despite
government efforts to improve the access and state of education in the country, such
biggest portion of the national budget for the Department of Education (Albert,
Quimba, Ramos, & Almeda, 2012), 36 million of the 6 to 24-year-old population is out-
of-school. That is one in every ten Filipino children and youth (FLEMMS, 2013). The
low quality of education in Philippine public schools manifests in the students’ poor
National Achievement Tests, the students only scored 68% in school year 2009 –
2010. The Philippines was also one of the worst participating countries in the Trends
addressing this problem, the Philippines is currently transitioning from a 10-year basic
education curriculum – the only country in Asia to still adapt this – to a 12-year cycle
(K-12 program). However, many educators believe that the country is not well
equipped for this transition to be successful. In fact, the current secretary of the
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) commented that many public
schools still do not have enough classrooms, teachers, chairs, and books (Ibon
educational resources are more pronounced for children in poverty. Data from 2002
to 2010 from the Department of Education show that in both private and public schools,
poor children. Even more children in poverty drop out when they reach high school,
with 89% participation rate in elementary school dropping to 65.1% in high school
(Yap, 2011). Critics are especially wary that this problem will be solved by the K-12
program, mainly because government resources are not yet guaranteed and additional
school years entail extra cost on the part of the household (Yap, 2011). It will be helpful
to know then what parents can do, despite these challenges, to effectively support
involvement, the various factors that facilitate or inhibit involvement, and how the
section also gives an overview of the state of education in the Philippines, the Filipino
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the research method to be used, the will be respondents of
the study, the instrument to be utilized, and the preparation for validation of
A qualitative design, rather than quantitative, is chosen for this study for the
following reasons. First, the use of semi-structured interviews best matches the objectives
of this study: to explore, describe, and explain (Daly, 2007). Second, the lack of research
hypotheses and conclusions to explore parental involvement and how it affects academic
allows for the exploration of the phenomenon straight from the data and avoids imposing
(2007), phenomenology is best suited for research that aims to understand individuals’
income Filipino families in this case. There are two schools of thought in phenomenology
assumed that the researcher’s experiences and judgments are set aside during the entire
research process. The ultimate goal of this approach is to describe a phenomenon without
regard for the researcher/s’ preconceived notions. On the other hand, interpretive
researchers cannot entirely remove themselves from the meanings obtained from the
interviews. Moreover, the researcher’s subjective views and beliefs help in interpreting
this study, exploring the meaning and the nature of parental involvement and how it
relates to children’s academic outcomes relied not only on the narratives of the
participants, but also on the researcher’s knowledge of the construct and interpretation
and examination of the interviews and field notes. A parental involvement study
approach (Hall, Hornby, & Macfarlane, 2015). The goal of their study was to explore the
factors which facilitate or hinder parental engagement among the Maoris, an indigenous
group in New Zealand. The study also used an indigenous methodology in data collection
and a cultural lens in interpreting their findings. These lend support that the
Besides from using the phenomenological approach, the data collection procedure
for this study will draw from the research methodology of Sikolohiyang Pilipino, which is
the psychology that is born out of the experience and orientation of the Filipinos (Enriquez,
language and to explain the phenomenon through the lens of the native Filipino in order
“indigenization from within” where conclusions are directly derived from the experiences
and socio-cultural realities of the Filipino people (Pe-Pua & Protacio-Marcelino, 2000).
analogous to that of phenomenology (drawing conclusion only from the data and avoiding
assumptions). As such, Sikolohiyang Pilipino suitably complemented the goals of the
stories). This can be likened to the traditional method of interviewing, except for the role
of the researcher and the participant and the manner of data collection. In
experiences about the topic. Pakikipagkwentuhan aims for systematic procedures, for
was allowed in the questions (e.g., adding or omitting questions when deemed
appropriate) and each interview was set in a less formal tone that can be more likened to
a friendly, casual conversation. In addition, prior to starting the interview, the researcher
tried to build rapport with the participant by engaging her in conversation and by sharing
Sikolohiyang Pilipino, to minimize the gap between researcher and participant and to help
& Protacio-Marcelino, 2000). This approach was used as this has been found to be
culturally-sensitive and more appropriate in doing research with Filipino samples (de
uses a mutual-orientation model (Viney, 1988). This model engenders an equal status
between the researcher and the participant, where each gives something to, and gains
something from, the data collection. This equal and amicable relationship between the
researcher and the participant, rather than a more formal and distant one, positively
The researcher will employ purposive sampling with the help of the school (i.e.,
the school principal and one classroom adviser) to identify the potential participants in
terms of the students’ academic grades. The researcher will ask for help from school in
identifying students with average grades and students who were on academic probation
participants, researcher will be sending recruitment letters to parents through the school
with the instruction to contact the school or the researcher if the parent is willing to be
interviewed. The researcher then will contact the interested parents through phone call
and/or text message to provide a brief overview of the study and what the participation
entails. A date and time for the interview will be set for parents who agreed to participate.
Each interview will last from 19 minutes to 71 minutes, averaging 39.13 minutes in length.
in size, from 3 to 4, to 10 to 15. The target minimum number of participants for this study
collection. Bernard (2005) identified three types of field notes and these three were
utilized in this study. First, there were methodological notes where thoughts and insights
on recruitment and data collection procedures were logged. Second, descriptive notes
included observations and reflections on each interview were recorded, as well as the
researcher’s personal reactions and perceptions of the interview. Finally, analytic notes
contained initial reflections on the participants’ responses and ideas on emergent themes.
suggested by Creswell and Miller (2000) were conducted. First, rich and thick description
of the participants’ experiences were presented to give a vivid and clear narrative to the
readers, giving them enough evidence to make sense of the study and to make decisions
will provide feedback and additional insights on the findings. This will led to the addition
of further descriptions of some concepts and behaviors to ensure that readers understand
the context and the interpretation of findings. Lastly, the researcher will continuously
researcher’s personal values and preconceptions which can influence data collection and
researcher’s subjective views and potential biases are made explicit (Creswell, 2007). As
a parent itself, the researcher have a similar cultural background with the participants,
and this can serve as a common ground to give way to a smooth interaction with the
participants. The researcher will be especially careful not to interpret the data according
to her own beliefs and assumptions. In addition, the researcher will constantly refer to the
recorded field notes to aid in data analysis. For the researcher, to be involved means to
know important information about the child’s school life. Nonetheless, the researcher
will honor the participant’s response that she is an involved parent as that must be
reflective of her lived experiences and how she views the phenomenon. Finally, there was
regular consultation with the advisor to ensure that the findings remained objective and