Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ppa
Ppa
Ppa
Public administration is the cultivation of the human race to organize society and its capacity
to direct it by virtue of laws and regulations. It pushes communities to achieve a common goal
that is public - oriented (Caiden 1982 as cited in Brillantes and Fernandez, 2008). Studying and
learning about public administration is internationally recognized and given strong interest by
national governments and scholarly experts. This field of study is given great importance and
attention so that the institutionalized body can properly analyse and understand effective
principles and political structures were inherited from the United States during pre- and post-
colonial ties with the country (Hutchcroft, 2000). This statement coincides with that of Cruz
(2011) wherein she stated that “The country’s administrative practices and bureaucratic culture
are a blend of indigenous social forces, implanted norms, and colonial legacies.” The Philippine
public administration as a field of study was officially introduced in the 1950’s. It showcased
the inimitable way of Filipinos in running, managing, and organizing public service (Sajo,
1993). Raul de Guzman emphasized the fact that there is indeed a Philippine Public
Administration the same way that it does in America, France and Thailand; but it should also
be known that prior contextualization in the Philippine setting is required for appropriation of
the definition (Gaylord, 2014). The reinforcement of Philippine public administration as a field
of study can be attributed to the establishment of the Institute of Public Administration at the
University of the Philippines by the Americans in 1952 (Brillantes and Fernandez, 2008).
According to Sajo (1993), it is both a field of study and a government bureaucracy shaped by
three major institutions such as education, politics, and the government. It is influenced by 2
the technical aspects, the problem of democracy and accountability, the role of the people, and
the issue of indigenization. The realization of the Philippine public administration’s existence
comes from the presence of administrative structures, institutional processes, and a system
Public Administration can be traced back to human history. It has been suggested that it is as
old as the ancient empires of China, India, Egypt, Greece, Rome and Mesopotamia. The
administration. Such arrangement has existed in all societies (Caiden (1982). All societies are
devoted to advancing the general welfare or the public interest. The idea that “public
administration should not be considered administration of the public but administration for the
public” has been practiced and expressed in the Code of Hammurabi, in Confucianism and in
In other words, the idea of client – oriented public administration has its roots ancient public
administration.
Caiden (1982) also noted that the genesis of Public Administration must have had originated
from monarchial Europe where household officials were divided into two groups: one in charge
of public affairs, i.e. the administration of justice, finance training of armies, and the other is
responsible of personal services. Rutgers (1998) supports this claim that (i.e. royal)
administration had already been manifested way back in the mid - 17th century and early 18th
century in Prussia.
F.K. Medikus (as cited in Rutgers 1998) likewise argued on the study of public administration
and its positions amidst the sciences in 18th century. He advocated “cameralism” and claimed
that it should be treated as an autonomous field of study of great importance of the state.
Cameral science is designed to prepare potential public officials for government service. This
practice flourished in Europe until the 21st century but it was, in the long run, replaced by
The evolution of public administration as a practice and discipline can be categorized into two
major phases namely the traditional and modern phase. According to Brillantes and Fernandez
(2008), the traditional/classical phase dates back from the 1800s to the 1950s, while the modern
phase dates back from the 1950s up until the present. The Modern phase is subdivided into the
following phases: (1) development administration, (2) new public administration, (3) new
public management and reinventing governance, (4) and public administration as governance.
In the Philippines, these phases tackles areas such as reorganization, decentralization, and
corruption concerns (Brillantes and Fernandez, 2008). As stated earlier, the US government
had a direct effect that shaped the Philippine public administration. The traditional phase was
heavily influenced due to the existence of colonialism, but it is a fact that their influence persists
until today. The identity crisis carried on and it paved the way for the modern phase to take
focuses on emerging/developing countries. After World War II, these third world countries
its democratic framework of administration (Brillantes and Fernandez, 2008). The term New
Public Administration emerged from the 1960s to 1970s and Pilar (1993) recognized its
significance in the field of philosophy, content, purposes, processes, and techniques. He also
emphasized that it corresponds with the objective of the Philippine government. The idea of
New Public Management and Reinventing Government emerged from the 1980s to 1990s.
Doubts, questions, and queries about traditional administration strategies took place where
reinventing government and reengineering also emerged around the same time.” In the
Philippine setting, it was about this time when the country is undergoing massive changes after
the People Power Revolution. Sajo (1993) reiterated there was a shift from an authoritarian to
a democratic system during the late 80s. This was after the late dictator, President Marcos, used
the government to seek for US approval. From his ousting, the challenge was to know how
the current bureaucratic system can be reformed to cater a new government that is based on
democracy rather than a dictatorship. The main challenges then were to balance the distribution
dichotomy to recognize the fact that administration will always be surrounded by issues in
politics (Sajo, 1993).Public Administration as Governance emerged from 1990s into the 2000s.
The term “governance” was endorsed by the United Nations, World Bank, and Asian
Development Bank. It involves a wider perspective and deeper meaning mostly refers to
their rights, and mediate their differences in pursuit of the collective good” (ADB 1995 as