Sydney Gibson reflects on feedback received for an inquiry module project. The feedback suggested that Sydney's work lacked straightforward examples and was repetitive. Sydney plans to revise the project by providing better examples of how specific technologies could be used in the classroom and why they may be helpful or not. Sydney learned that giving and receiving feedback can help improve work by making needed revisions. Sydney also realized they were too quick to dismiss technology in the classroom without considering how certain technologies could benefit students.
Sydney Gibson reflects on feedback received for an inquiry module project. The feedback suggested that Sydney's work lacked straightforward examples and was repetitive. Sydney plans to revise the project by providing better examples of how specific technologies could be used in the classroom and why they may be helpful or not. Sydney learned that giving and receiving feedback can help improve work by making needed revisions. Sydney also realized they were too quick to dismiss technology in the classroom without considering how certain technologies could benefit students.
Sydney Gibson reflects on feedback received for an inquiry module project. The feedback suggested that Sydney's work lacked straightforward examples and was repetitive. Sydney plans to revise the project by providing better examples of how specific technologies could be used in the classroom and why they may be helpful or not. Sydney learned that giving and receiving feedback can help improve work by making needed revisions. Sydney also realized they were too quick to dismiss technology in the classroom without considering how certain technologies could benefit students.
1. I did my peer feedback with Reegan Weith while we were both absent the day in class. Her feedback was very helpful, she said that my work might have been not as straightforward. It seemed that I was just mumbling a little bit in my work and that I was very repetitive in what I was saying. After I went back over my project, I did realize the points I wanted to get across were repetitive and I could have used other words or examples to show my reasonings. Also, she was giving me feedback on my examples of using technology in the classroom. She was saying that I should have used more real-life examples of what each technology could be used for with education and then give my opinion on why it may be good or bad. I didn’t get straight to the point with that and I could have done a better job with that in my project. 2. My plan to revise my project based on my feedback is to provide better realistic examples on what each technology could be used for in the classroom and why it is either helpful or not helpful. I also need to be more descriptive on why each technology benefits or doesn’t benefit the classroom. Another thing I would want to incorporate into my project better is what technology examples I would and would not want in my classroom. 3. What I have learned with the process of revision is how to give feedback and how to correctly look at someone’s work and be able to give feedback and revise their work in a good, respectful way to help benefit the student. I also learned how to receive criticism in a way that will also help benefit me as a student and what I can do to make my work better. If I were to approach this project again, like I said before, I think I would make my work straightforward and get more to the point of my work and my reasonings. 4. I just think in this project I always figured technology in the classroom was just a bad idea when certain technology could actually benefit the upcoming generations. I think technology could be very beneficial and I think I should have given it a chance when it comes to technology in the classroom rather than just saying it hasn’t provided us with anything good when it really has in todays society.