‘eld within limite which ‘were
‘splcally much smaller than what would be expected
With conventional
Lie stra of te OB sat te
headin aot 25 BP cia oe
trea all, et at
ieee i, ree
whe Ric a eat
PE Ee os nme
cry
inside the soil chamber can be tepresentod by the
‘cart pressure ratio (EPR). When the EPR is ih the
‘ange of 0.95 to 1.05, the intial ground movements
fadaced by the approaching tunel are very small
Excessively high EPR would induce inital ground
beaving, while excessively low EPR would ult
initial ground setlement
2m femal cows 37
Geo voune ie mle ofwane) sas
pumping grost Imo the soil The conditioning was
exettial 10 tighten up the ground so that the
Sabsemient compensation grouting would be move
Affe the conditioning, the compensation growing
wes implemented 10” remedy any settement
gccaringinsanly afer ihe adiance ofthe TBM
Tn aikiton 1 this, 4 thixotopic gel rout
system was tied til te wos between the pou
fd the Ting segmca. This cavity grouting ms
‘Saher seamen and i sops wate fom sceng
‘tothe roel
“The properties of the compensation grow and
cavity gout ae doled 2 Toke T and Tae 2
Deis of the growing progranine ae given fh
Tabled
3 FIELD MEASUREMENTS
‘The movements due to tunelling were measured on
tariene fos sections at varios locas. The
Ionitoring was carried out using precise leveling
survey techniques. The measurements nelude
round, tuiding and tunnel Ining deformation due
{0 the excavation and compensation grouting. Only
twilding movements and cunnel lining deformation
dre reported inthis paper
3.1 Building movements
‘The building movements atthe Royal Hill Court
(RHO) ae presented here. The sil profile beneath
tte RHC is 2.5m Made Ground, followed by 11 5m
‘Tereace Gravel, 05m WRB and Thanet Sand. The
tunnel in Terrace Gravel with ks axis at a depth of
oat Im Because of the sensitivity of the
firocuse, twas decided to use compensation
‘routing io limit setiements due to twanelling.
‘The Royal Hill Cour is a 2storey reiforced
concrete frame building founded on shallow
foundations in the Terrace Gravel. Figure 2 shows
iypial cross sections dough the growing aay
Growing tubes ffom various shafls covered the
footprit of the foundations of the building. The
routing was about 2-3m from the tunel crown
‘The setlements of six points (61- 616) located
on the edge of the building ae shown in Figure 3.
‘The sold vertical lies in the Figure indicate the
onset of groating, each episode taking approximately
Hall 2 day. The effectiveness of compensation
routing in reducing setlements ean be seen. The
‘Foutng from shaft BI lied the building by about
Timm, Similsely, grouting ftom shafts B2 and C
caused an average lift of 7mm.
igus] Arata oon enemas
Pea ea
bb ia
Tinie Soemeien scan rear |
ty =
E =
Pe an eee
hee Pi |
pe
Figure 3. Setlement at Royal Hill Court before and
ater compensation grouting
In general compensation grouting has limited the
final Setlement to less than fmm for all poines
‘concerned. Hence, the compersition grouting has
resulted in the construction of the cuneels with
building seitlemests ess than Imm. and the
‘angular distorions less than 11000, teeby
satisfying the specified design extra
3.2 Tunnel lining deformation
Segmeotal tunnel inings were wsed gm the project.
The ining was made of $0 N/mm concrete and
swengthened by high yield reinforcement. The
segments were 250rim thick, 5.2m. iernal
diameter, and 1.2m wrde. Each ring consists of Key
‘segment, 2 top segments and 3 ordinary segnents
snd they are bolted togecber with 20min dizmeter
euved bolts. All longitudinal joints aze fitted with
bituminous packers to facilitate some jiat retin.
‘The lining has been designed for a 120 year sign
Iie
‘As showin in the previous section, compenssion
grouting reduced the building settemeat. However,
compensation grouting will not only reduce the
Settlement at or tea the ground sirface but nay ale
increase the stres on the lining and deform & iis
very important to monitor the tune! ining