Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EITHAD's Acquisition
EITHAD's Acquisition
21.1
Etihad’s Proposed Acquisition
of Malaysia Airlines
Shuvam Dutta
1
2 CASE STUDY
similar exposures. The airline was also exposed to fuel price volatility, partially miti-
gated by entering into jet fuel hedges.
The bankers articulated several strategic benefits arising from the potential acqui-
sition. The transaction would ensure major presences in two of the highest-growing
air traffic regions in the world (Asia and the Middle East) and allow Etihad to lever-
age consistently growing tourism and trade between Asia and the Middle East. The
acquisition would grant Etihad access to a complementary route network—30 out
of 56 unique MAS destinations in Asia did not overlap with Etihad’s routes. Impor-
tantly, it would give Etihad an opportunity to significantly strengthen its competitive
position on the important Kangaroo Route (London/Dubai to Sydney via Kuala
Lumpur/Singapore). Last, it would create a politically appealing alliance between
two Islamic nations’ flag carriers.
Etihad’s management asked its bankers to value the target based on trading
and transaction comparables. Based on a current share price of US$0.64, MAS was
trading at an equity value of US$1,316 million, which was at the lower end of its
12-month trading range between US$1,092 million and US$2,074 million—an at-
tractive entry price. On the other hand, research analysts were suggesting that prices
could fall further, reducing equity value to as low as US$910 million, which made the
current price less attractive than it seemed initially. However, based on comparable
trading multiples, the airline was undervalued relative to its Southeast Asian peers,
which were trading on higher multiples based on their enterprise value/EBITDA ra-
tios in 2010 and 2011. Market indicators, though, often do not serve as the best
indicators for successful bid prices, as airline mergers and acquisitions (M&A) trans-
actions in Asia cleared the market at significant premiums to traded value—reflect-
ing high investor interest in the market, acquisition synergies, and control premiums.
Thus, if precedent transactions were an indicator, the target could be valued at over
twice its current market value. (See Case Exhibit 21.1.)
Etihad’s management now wanted to embark on a more detailed due diligence
of the airline, culminating in a discounted cash-flow valuation of the airline based on
the projected financials shown in Case Exhibit 21.2. Malaysia Airlines was trading at
a levered beta of 1.06, with a market risk premium of 9.38 percent above a risk-free
rate of 3.68 percent. Its cost of debt based on outstanding bonds, loans, and leases was
3.09 percent. Etihad on the other hand was trading at a cost of equity of 10.5 percent
and a cost of debt of 2.4 percent. Based on these assumptions and the cash-flow projec-
tions provided in Case Exhibit 21.2, the deal team proceeded to value the acquisition.
(In Millions of MYR) 2007A 2008A 2009A 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E
Profit & Loss
Revenues 14,630.2 15,035.3 11,309.9 12,971.7 14,038.5 15,192.1 16,439.3 17,787.6
Operation expenses 14,031.9 14,855.2 11,866.6 12,473.8 12,591.4 13,620.2 14,442.8 15,345.5
—Fuel cost 4,915.8 6,531.6 3,497.3 4,330.0 4,335.1 4,509.8 4,619.9 4,763.0
—Depreciation 2,082.5 1,890.8 1,846.7 1,751.4 1,305.6 1,588.6 1,683.7 1,775.8
—Others 7,033.6 6,432.8 6,522.6 6,422.4 6,950.6 7,521.7 8,139.2 8,806.8
EBITDA 2,680.8 2,070.9 1,290.0 2,249.2 2,752.8 3,160.5 3,680.1 4,217.9
EBIT 598.3 180.1 (556.7) 497.9 1,447.2 1,571.9 1,996.4 2,442.1
Net profit 795.5 244.3 490.3 177.3 1,145.1 1,193.9 1,554.2 1,996.7
Balance sheet
Gross debt (includes off-
balance-sheet debt) 8,256.2 8,938.2 7,390.2 6.081.0 7,898.5 10,157,5 10,318.9 9,681.5
Net debt (includes off-
balance-sheet debt) 3,821.9 5,366.4 4,725.4 4,133.5 4,662.1 5,774.9 4,539.2 2,210.0
Cash 4,434.3 3,571.7 2,664.9 1,947.5 3,236.4 4,382.6 5,779.7 7,471.6
PPE 9,457.7 9,984.0 8,182.6 6,764.9 8,594.8 11,070.0 11,572.3 11,440.3
Total assets 17,458.5 17,590.8 13,598.3 11,983.3 15,362.0 19,264.5 21,467.7 23,356.2
Shareholders’ equity
(excluding MI) 3,934.9 4,185.7 735.7 913.0 2,058.1 3,252.0 4,806.2 6,802.8
Cash flow
Cash flow from
operating activities 4,108.5 939.3 (47.7) 925.6 2,606.9 2,951.1 3,421.6 3,973.0
Cash flow from
3
investing activities (2,245.2) (2,922.6) (1,306.0) (1,693.2) (2,942.4) (4,480.2) (2,230.1) (1,747.1)
Cash flow from
financing activities 986.3 489.6 862.5 50.3 1,624.5 2,675.2 205.6 (534.1)
4 CASE STUDY