Breakout 3 September 26th

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Date: September 26, 2019

Break-Out Title/Topic: Research Methods. Resources Time

Bridge-in: 1.0
- As we heard in the lecture, there are many different
methods of research.
- Todays meetup will focus on another group worksheet that
looks at possible studies and their research method
counterparts.

Pre-Assessment: 3.0
- What type of research methods exist in the world of
Psychology?
- How do we know what method to use for different kinds of
studies?

Learning Objective: 0.5


- Strengthen your grasp on research methods and provide
the necessary skills to defend your choice of method for a
specific case study.

Participatory Activity: Worksheet 12.00


1. Explain how to complete the worksheet in groups. Key supplied by
talking point; there is no definite answer, rather a possible Professor
“best” answer. Points come from rational and explanation Jackson along
behind each choice. with the mentor
2. Split members into 2-3 sub-groups and complete the first “key” page for
question with them all together briefly. personal
3. For questions 2-7, monitor progress in the groups and try reference only.
to ask questions that guide the members to a better Both attached
answer if their current answer or rational is largely below for your
incorrect. consideration.
4. When groups have completed the worksheet, be sure to
tell them to bring it to Professor Jackson.

Post-Assessment 2.5
- What do we look for in a case study that helps determine
what research method could be used?

Summary 1.00
- After completing this group worksheet, everyone should
have a stronger grasp on the different research methods
and when they should be used.
Mentor: _________________________

Names (FIRST and LAST!) ______________________________________________________

In-Class #2: Which Method Would You Use?

For each of these possible research questions, list which research method is appropriate and
BRIEFLY describe why. These are your choices for the methods: case histories, naturalistic observation,
laboratory observation, surveys, tests, correlational studies, and experiments.

1. Determining the favourite food of adolescents.


Method:
Explanation:

2. Determining whether a person is introverted or extroverted.


Method:
Explanation:

3. Determining if frustration causes aggression.


Method:
Explanation:

4. Determining if level of education is associated with crime.


Method:
Explanation:

5. Determining how teenagers behave on their first date.


Method:
Explanation:

6. Determining the behaviour of subjects who are anxious about participating in research.
Method:
Explanation:

7. Determining why a housewife gave up a flourishing career.


Method:
Explanation:
Activity: Which Method Would You Use?

Suggested Answers – these are possibly the “best” methods for these research questions, but
what you want to do is have the students discuss and generate answers for “Method” and
“Explanation.” It is more about the process of them discussing the different methods and
justifying why they chose a particular method. Use this “answer key” to help guide them. Do the
first one or two with them and show them how to use the book and use discussion to arrive at an
answer as a group.

The following examples can be used to generate a class discussion on the research methods used by
psychologists. Write the methods on the board: case histories, naturalistic observation, laboratory
observation, surveys, tests, correlational studies, and experiments. Then, for each situation, ask students
to decide which method is appropriate and briefly describe why.
1. Determining the favorite food of adolescents.
Method: Survey
Explanation: Adolescents constitute a large population and the information sought should be accessible
through questionnaires or interviews. Care will be needed to construct a sample that is representative of
the population under consideration.
2. Determining whether a person is introverted or extroverted.
Method: Psychological test
Explanation: The goal is to measure psychological qualities within an individual. Other methods (e.g.,
case history, naturalistic observation) might be employed, but they are more timeconsuming and do not
offer the degree of standardization, reliability, and validity found in a wellconstructed test.
3. Determining if frustration causes aggression.
Method: Experiment
Explanation: Cause-and-effect information is being sought. In science this information is obtained through
experimentation in which the proposed causal variable is manipulated under controlled conditions.
4. Determining if level of education is associated with crime.
Method: Correlation
Explanation: This technique is used to determine if and how strongly two variables are related.
Establishing that a correlation exists, however, does not address the problem of why two things are
related.
5. Determining how teenagers behave on their first date.
Method: Naturalistic observation
Explanation: A description of behaviour as it occurs in a real-life situation is being sought. Making the
observations without arousing suspicion in subjects could be problematic, and the investigator will need to
be careful to prevent “guinea-pig” reaction.
6. Determining the behaviour of subjects who are anxious about participating in research.
Method: Laboratory observation
Explanation: The goal here can be readily achieved within an environment artificially set up by the
experimenter. The advantage of this approach is that the investigator has greater control over the
situation being studied.
7. Determining why a housewife gave up a flourishing career.
Method: Case history
Explanation: Making this determination requires in-depth information about the way a variety of
psychological factors, expectations, values, motives, past experiences, and so forth, blend together within
the person. This kind of information is unique to the person and could not be assessed through
standardized tests.

You might also like