Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Comparison Between Batas Pambansa Bilang 68
A Comparison Between Batas Pambansa Bilang 68
A Comparison Between Batas Pambansa Bilang 68
Comment:
Republic Act No. 11232 - It amends a 38-year-old Corporation Code in an effort to improve the ease
of doing business in the Philippines.
The amendment is to indicate the difference between the two Corporation Code and to imply which of
the two laws is still binding. The purpose of the re-enactment is to align the country’s primary law on
corporations with the rest of the world’s, by updating it. The new Code is more responsive to the
changing needs of business, and provides ample protection to persons dealing with corporations.
Also, under the new Code, all corporations authorized to obtain or access funds from the public may
not issue no par shares. This prohibition is not anymore limited to “banks, trusts, insurance
companies, public utilities and building and loan associations.
SEC. 3. Classes of Corporations. – Corporations formed or organized under this Code may be
stock or nonstock corporations. Stock corporations are those which have capital stock divided into
shares and are authorized to distribute to the holders of such shares, dividends, or allotments of the
surplus profits on the basis of the shares held. All other corporations are nonstock corporations.
Comment:
This is because corporation formed to provided monetary or material benefits to its owners must be a
stock corporation. The Code provides for the formation of a close corporation, which is in the nature
of an incorporated partnership consisting of 2-20 shareholders. It allows owners to do business as
partners, but with limited liability as shareholders of a regular stock corporation.
Comment:
The amendment specifies when one is a stockholder or shareholder and when one is a member.
Corporators of stock corporations are generally called “stockholders” or “shareholders” while those of
non-stock corporations are called members. Accordingly, the law generally divides into two branches
the function of ownership and management.
Comment:
Under this new law, even holders of non-voting shares are entitled to vote in the eight important
matters enumerated in the third paragraph of this section. Here, the ability to issue different classes of
shares allows the corporation to entice prospective funders with varying requirements in terms of risks
and benefits to invest. Furthermore, this new law still expressly permits the corporation to classify its
shares for the purpose of ensuring compliance with constitutional or legal requirements. Despite that a
corporation may issue preferred, redeemable, convertible, voting, non-voting, par or no par shares,
there will always be common shares with full voting rights issued to residual owners of the
corporation.”
Comment:
The new law permits the incorporators to have certain rights and privileges that are not enjoyed by the
corporators. In this regard, the Commission may relax the application of the following limitations vis-a-
vis the founder’s shares for a limited period. Here, the other rights and privileges of founders are not
limited by the five-year period, under the condition that such are consistent with the Code and
approved by the Commission. The Code has done away with the corporation having to separately
secure Commission’s approval of such exclusive right or privilege. The approval of the articles carries
with it approval of the right or privilege provided in such articles.
CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Section 8. Redeemable shares. - Redeemable shares may be issued by the corporation when
expressly so provided in the articles of incorporation. They may be purchased or taken up by the
corporation upon the expiration of a fixed period, regardless of the existence of unrestricted retained
earnings in the books of the corporation, and upon such other terms and conditions as may be stated
in the articles of incorporation, which terms and conditions must also be stated in the certificate of
stock representing said shares. (n)
Comment:
The new law deleted the phrase “or taken up by the corporation”. Furthermore, it explicitly made the
redemption subject to rules and regulations issued by the Commission. Here, the Code adopted the
Commission’s Rules Governing Redeemable and Treasury Shares. Under these rules, corporations
which have issued redeemable shares with mandatory redemption features are required to set up and
maintain a sinking fund. Furthermore, redeemable shares may be redeemed, regardless of the
unrestricted retained earnings, under the condition that the corporation has, after such redemption,
sufficient assets in its books to cover debts and liabilities inclusive of capital stock.
TITLE II
INCORPORATION AND ORGANIZATION OF PRIVATE CORPORATIONS
Comment:
The RCC removed the absolute requirement of having a minimum of 5 individuals in the formation of
corporations.
The new law limits the number of incorporators, while it removed the prescribed minimum number of
incorporators. Here, a single person may now form a corporation sole or one-person corporation.
However, the new law did not limit the number of original subscribers or contributors. Also, the latter
are not required to verify the corporate charter. Furthermore, in this new Code, incorporators need not
to be natural persons. Unlike the old Code, it does not prescribe a residency requirement; majority of
the incorporators need not be residents of the Philippines
Comment:
The corporate term limit of 50 years has been removed such that a corporation can now enjoy
perpetual existence unless expressly limited by its AOI. Such perpetual corporate term shall also
apply to corporations incorporated prior to the RCC, unless said corporations elect to retain a specific
corporate term. The new law also states that a corporation whose term has expired can apply with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the revival of its corporate existence, with all the
rights and privileges under its certificate of incorporation and subject to all of its duties, debts and
liabilities existing prior to its revival. Upon the SEC’s approval, the corporation shall be deemed
revived and a certificate of revival of corporate existence shall be issued giving it perpetual existence,
unless its application for revival provides otherwise.
Comment:
The RCC removed the requirement that 25% of the authorized capital stock be subscribed and that
25% of the subscribed capital stock be paid for purposes of incorporation as previously mandated
under Section 13 of the Corporation Code, which was deleted in its entirety.
CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Section 14. Contents of the articles of incorporation. - All corporations organized under this code
shall file with the Securities and Exchange Commission articles of incorporation in any of the official
languages duly signed and acknowledged by all of the incorporators, containing substantially the
following matters, except as otherwise prescribed by this Code or by special law:
1. The name of the corporation;
2. The specific purpose or purposes for which the corporation is being incorporated. Where a
corporation has more than one stated purpose, the articles of incorporation shall state which is the
primary purpose and which is/are the secondary purpose or purposes: Provided, That a non-stock
corporation may not include a purpose which would change or contradict its nature as such;
3. The place where the principal office of the corporation is to be located, which must be within the
Philippines;
4. The term for which the corporation is to exist;
5. The names, nationalities and residences of the incorporators;
6. The number of directors or trustees, which shall not be less than five (5) nor more than fifteen (15);
7. The names, nationalities and residences of persons who shall act as directors or trustees until the
first regular directors or trustees are duly elected and qualified in accordance with this Code;
8. If it be a stock corporation, the amount of its authorized capital stock in lawful money of the
Philippines, the number of shares into which it is divided, and in case the share are par value shares,
the par value of each, the names, nationalities and residences of the original subscribers, and the
amount subscribed and paid by each on his subscription, and if some or all of the shares are without
par value, such fact must be stated;
9. If it be a non-stock corporation, the amount of its capital, the names, nationalities and residences of
the contributors and the amount contributed by each; and
10. Such other matters as are not inconsistent with law and which the incorporators may deem
necessary and convenient.
The Securities and Exchange Commission shall not accept the articles of incorporation of any stock
corporation unless accompanied by a sworn statement of the Treasurer elected by the subscribers
showing that at least twenty-five (25%) percent of the authorized capital stock of the corporation has
been subscribed, and at least twenty-five (25%) of the total subscription has been fully paid to him in
actual cash and/or in property the fair valuation of which is equal to at least twenty-five (25%) percent
of the said subscription, such paid-up capital being not less than five thousand (P5,000.00) pesos.
Comment:
Stock corporations are still not required to have a minimum capital stock, unless specifically provided
by special law. Notably, in the revised form of the Articles of Incorporation (AOI), it is no longer
required that the capitalization be in “lawful money of the Philippines”.
Comment:
Here, the amendment is already binding to all parties; all shareholders or members, even those who
did not approve the same, the corporation and the State. However, the law permits dissenting
shareholders to exercise their appraisal right, in accordance with the Code of Corporation. The new
Code imposes special requirements for the adoption and implementation of certain corporate actions.
Comment:
Under the RCC, non-compliance with the legal requirements does not merit an outright denial of the
application. Here, the applicant is given reasonable time to cure the defect of the application or
remove the ground for disapproval. Also, the RCC deleted from the list of corporations required to
obtain an endorsement from the primary regulator “public utilities, educational institution, and other
corporations governed by special laws.” the paring down of the list only means that other primary
regulators do not see the need for their endorsement prior to the registration with the Commission of
corporations under their jurisdiction or authority.
Comment:
Under the RCC, this section covers even the proposed name that has been reserved for use by a
company to be incorporated or already in the process of incorporation. Unlike the old corporation
code, the RCC provides for the specific provisions and circumstances which make the proposed
name indistinguishable or distinguishable. Here, the sole criterion of in distinguishability is the
distinguishability of the names
Comment:
Under the revised corporation code, the formation of a corporation generally involves processes such
as the submission and reservation of of corporate name, the initial submission of the articles of
incorporation, and by laws for the review of the Commission’s processors, the submission of the
signed and authorized articles of incorporation and bylaws, and the issuance of the certificate of
incorporation with the attached signed and notarized articles of incorporation and bylaws, which the
signals the grant of the corporate character then the corporation acquires a juridical personality.
Comment:
The Code provides a reverse application in that the persons who purportedly comprise the ostensible
corporation may not deny obligations or dealings with a third party acting in good faith. Here, a
defacto corporation shall not be required into collaterally in any private suit to which such corporation
may be a party. Except when, there is an ostensible corporation, as there is in fact no corporation that
is subject of such inquiry.
Comment:
The RCC also extends the allowable period for non-use of corporate charter from 2 years to 5 years
from the date of incorporation. The certificate of incorporation shall be deemed revoked as of the day
following the end of the 5-year period. Meanwhile, a corporation which has commenced its business
but subsequently becomes inoperative for a period of at least 5 years may be deemed a delinquent
corporation and shall have a period of 2 years to resume operations. Failure to resume operations
within the period given by the SEC shall cause the revocation of its certificate of incorporation
TITLE III
BOARD OF DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Comment:
With the introduction of the OPC, the minimum number of directors to incorporate is reduced from 5 to
1, while the maximum is retained at 15 directors. For trustees, however, the RCC has removed the
maximum number which can be elected. Some of the changes in the qualification and term of the
board of director or trustees include the removal of the residency requirement for a majority of the
board and the extension of the term of trustees from 1 year to 3 years
Comment:
The new law allows stockholders or members, when authorized by the By-Laws or by a majority of the
board of directors, to vote through remote communication methods or inabsentia. A stockholder or
member who participates through remote communication or inabsentia will still be considered
present for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum
Comment:
The RCC mandates a corporation vested with public interest to appoint a Compliance Officer, in
addition to the mandatory positions of President, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary. The law now
also expressly requires that the Treasurer be a resident of the Philippines.
Comment:
The election or non-holding of election of the directors, trustees and officers of the corporation is
required to be reported to the SEC, which is empowered under certain conditions to summarily order
that an election be held.
Comment:
In this section, the Code introduced additional grounds for the disqualification of directors, trustees, or
officers. The new Code allowed the Commission to remove disqualified directors, trustees or officers,
and blacklist them in proper cases. The Code includes violation of the SRC within the five-year period,
administrative finding for fraudulent acts, and analogous finding by a foreign court or equivalent
foreign regulatory authority as additional grounds for disqualification. Also, the new Code allows the
Commission and other regulatory authority to provide additional list of qualifications and
disqualifications, including fit and proper requirements, in the promotion of good corporate
governance.
Comment:
The RCC empowers the SEC, unilaterally or upon a verified complaint, and after due notice and
hearing, to remove members of the Board of Directors/Trustees who are determined to be disqualified
to be elected to or to hold such position.
Comment:
When there is a vacancy in the Office of the Director/Trustee which prevents the remaining directors
from constituting a quorum and emergency action is required to prevent irreparable loss or damage to
the corporation, the remaining directors are allowed to temporarily fill the vacancy from among the
officers of the corporation, thereby constituting an emergency board, subject to certain requirements.
Comment:
Under the RCC, a corporation vested with public interest must appoint a compliance officer. Here, the
corporation is required to submit to its shareholders and the Commission an annual report of the total
compensation of its directors or trustees. Also, under this new Code, observance of duty of loyalty is
relevant when directors or trustees enter into a contract with the corporation, negotiate on their
compensation, and personally acquire a corporate personality. However, the RCC prohibits the
directors and trustees to participate in the determination of his compensation.
Comment:
The Revised Corporation Code mandates a director or trustee, who has a potential interest in any
related party transaction, to recuse from voting on the approval of the related party transaction,
without prejudice to compliance with the requirements of this section. The new Code expands the
concept of self-dealing contracts to include contracts with spouse and relatives within the fourth civil
degree of consanguinity or affinity. The Code does not permit shareholders’ or members’ ratification
when the contract is material, with a public interest company and not approved by the qualified board.
The law requires an unbiased corporate approval, that the board must approve the transaction,
without the participation of the conflicted director or trustee.
Comment:
In view of the multi-faceted and comprehensive duties of the Board associated with their over-all final
responsibility of managing the affairs of the corporation, the Board need to structure itself and adopt a
board protocol to guide its own internal processes. The new Code requires it to consider creating
specialized committees to aid it in the performance of its functions.
TITLE IV
POWERS OF CORPORATION
Section 36. Corporate powers and capacity. - Every corporation incorporated under this Code has the
power and capacity:
1. To sue and be sued in its corporate name;
2. Of succession by its corporate name for the period of time stated in the articles of incorporation and
the certificate of incorporation;
3. To adopt and use a corporate seal;
4. To amend its articles of incorporation in accordance with the provisions of this Code;
5. To adopt by-laws, not contrary to law, morals, or public policy, and to amend or repeal the same in
accordance with this Code;
6. In case of stock corporations, to issue or sell stocks to subscribers and to sell stocks to subscribers
and to sell treasury stocks in accordance with the provisions of this Code; and to admit members to
the corporation if it be a non-stock corporation;
7. To purchase, receive, take or grant, hold, convey, sell, lease, pledge, mortgage and otherwise deal
with such real and personal property, including securities and bonds of other corporations, as the
transaction of the lawful business of the corporation may reasonably and necessarily require, subject
to the limitations prescribed by law and the Constitution;
8. To enter into merger or consolidation with other corporations as provided in this Code;
9. To make reasonable donations, including those for the public welfare or for hospital, charitable,
cultural, scientific, civic, or similar purposes: Provided, That no corporation, domestic or foreign, shall
give donations in aid of any political party or candidate or for purposes of partisan political activity;
10. To establish pension, retirement, and other plans for the benefit of its directors, trustees, officers
and employees; and
11. To exercise such other powers as may be essential or necessary to carry out its purpose or
purposes as stated in the articles of incorporation. (13a)
Comment:
Under Section 35 of the RCC, additional powers are expressly granted to corporations, namely: the
power to enter into a partnership, joint venture or any other commercial agreement with a natural
person or another corporation [Sec. 35 (h)]; and, for domestic corporations, the power to donate to a
political party or candidate or for purposes of partisan political activity
Comment:
Under the new Code, a corporation has perpetual existence. This rule applies to an existing
corporation, whose articles of incorporation shall be deemed amended to reflect its perpetual term,
unless the corporation elects to retain its limited form. The law requires shareholders’ or members’
approval, and the procedure in securing the same. Under this new Code, a dissenting shareholder
may exercise his appraisal right in accordance with the law. Such right then applies to the extension
and to the shortening of the corporation term
Comment:
The new Code incorporates the PCC merger clearance requirement, when applicable under the
circumstances. In relation to the increase or decrease in capital stock, or incurring, creating or
increasing any bonded indebtedness, apart from the requirement of prior approval of the Commission
and the PCC, the new Code also requires the filing of the application with the Commission within six
months from the date of approval of the board of directors and stockholders. This period imposed by
the new Code, may be extended for justifiable reasons.
Comment:
The old Corporation Code did not have a provision on statutory or ordinary merger or consolidation.
What it had was the provision on de facto merger, which is likewise considered a merger as
contemplated by the Tax Code, specifically: “the acquisition by one corporation of all or substantially
all the properties of another corporation solely for stock xxx undertaken for a bona fide business
purpose and not solely for the purpose of escaping the burden of taxation xxx where each and every
step of the transaction shall be treated as a single unit.” The practice then was to eventually dissolve
the transferor corporation and distribute to its shareholders the shares received from the transferee
corporation. The Revised Corporation Code however, has done away with the above two-step
procedure by providing for a statutory or ordinary merger.
Comment:
Under the OCC and RCC, shareholders and members form a corporation and contribute for its main
purpose. The OCC allows the corporation to only divert the use of such assets for any of its
secondary purposes where there is approval from its shareholders or members. The diversion alters
the premise behind their capital contribution. However, the Revised Corporation Code permits a
dissenting shareholder to exercise his appraisal right. Under the RCC, shareholders’ or members’
approval is no longer a requirement, and a board approval is already sufficient when the investment is
reasonably necessary to accomplish its main purpose.
Comment:
The new Code requires a higher shareholders’ or members’ approval on the part of the managed
corporation if the two corporations, both managed and managing corporations, have interlocking
ownership and/or management. Furthermore, because the management of the corporation lies on the
board, the board may not escape from its responsibility and delegate the same to others, except when
specifically authorized pursuant to this section or in favor of an executive committee created pursuant
to the bylaws.
Comment:
The new code no longer imposed any period after the incorporation within which by laws should be
filed with the Corporation. Hence, in the absence of such period, the corporation’s failure to file the
same is no longer a ground for suspension or revocation of its franchise. The new Code allows its
adoption and filing even prior to incorporation or submission together with the articles of incorporation.
It also requires that the bylaws are effective only upon the issuance by the Commission of a
certification that they are in accordance with the Code. Also, the new Code permits the bylaws to
stipulate on the maximum number of other board representations that an independent director or
trustee may have which shall, in no case, be more than the number prescribed by the SEC.
Comment:
The new code encourages the adoption of rules for the promotion of good governance and anti-graft
and corruption practices. The law provides a non-exhaustive list of stipulations or rules that may be
incorporated in the bylaws. What the code changed are the default rules on the place and manner of
calling and conducting regular or special meetings, the manner of voting in the said meetings, the
persons who may vote through proxies, the time for holding the annual election of directors or trustees
and the mode or manner of giving notice thereof, and the manner of issuing stock certificates. The
new Code added possible stipulations by which a stockholder, member, director or trustee may attend
meetings and cast their votes. Also, the code added a possible stipulation on their responsibilities,
maximum number of other board representations that an independent director or trustee. The Code
also provides prescribed quorum in order for the body to transact lawful business.
Comment:
Under the new Code, the bylaws may permit shareholders or members to cast vote through remote
communication or in absentia. Here, the Commission is required to issue the prescribed rules and
regulations.
TITLE VI
MEETINGS
Comment:
The RCC now provides that if the date of the regular meeting of the stockholders or members is not
fixed in the By-Laws, the same shall be held on any date after April 15 of every year as determined by
the Board of Directors/Trustees. Written notices of regular meetings may now be sent to stockholders
and members through electronic mail and such other means as may be allowed by the SEC. The right
of stockholders or members to vote may now also be exercised through remote communication or in
absentia, under rules and regulations to be issued by the SEC governing participation and voting
through remote communication or in absentia, taking into account the company’s scale, number of
shareholders or members, structure, and other factors consistent with the protection and promotion of
shareholders’ or members’ meetings.
Comment:
The Code requires that an actual meeting be held at a place where shareholders or members are
expected to attend. However, it is no longer practicable. Hence, the Code does not anymore
recognize alternative city or municipality within a metropolitan areas as venue of the meetings. As
much as possible, the venue should be at the principal. Only when it is not practicable will the meeting
be held at another place, provided it is within city stipulated in the bylaws. Furthermore, under the new
Code, formal defect in the notice or the improper holding of the meeting will not invalidate the
proceedings. Presence of all the shareholders or members without timely objection cures the defect or
impropriety in the conduct of meeting and constitutes a waiver.
Comment:
The new Code requires presence of majority of the directors and trustees to have quorum for board
meetings. However, the articles or bylaws may provide for a greater majority. This will afford
protection to minority shareholders or members. Higher quorum will likely require presence of their
nominated directors or trustees to have a valid meeting. The new Code transposes the old provision
on quorum with relatively minor revisions. Under the new Code, the notice must be sent at least 2
days prior to the scheduled meeting. However, the by laws, as provided by the Revised Corporation
Code, may provide a longe period for the protection of shareholders or members.
Comment:
In the new Code, there is a change in default rule on who may preside meetings. Unless the by laws
shall provide otherwise, the RCC authorize the chairman presides at meetings of the board, and of
shareholders or members.
Comment:
The new Code expands the coverage of this section by including all cases when a stockholder grants
“security interest” over his or her shares in favor of another person. Also, under the new Code, it is the
corporation through the corporate secretary or any other authorized officer that should notify the
Commission in case of death of a director.
Comment:
Here, although shareholders and members ordinarily cast their vote personally in a meeting, in certain
cases they do not have the incentive to attend the meetings. Hence, the new code lightened the
weight of this section to consider certain unavoidable circumstances that bars a shareholder or a
member from attending meetings.
TITLE VII
STOCKS AND STOCKHOLDERS
Comment:
In this section not much was revised as well, aside from the additional provision bolded above. The
new Code provides safeguards to ensure payment of unpaid subscription. The corporation, under this
Code, cannot issue stock certificates and recognize any subsequent transfer of shares unless the
subscription is paid in full. Also, in case of delinquency, under this new Code, the corporation may
cause the sale of shares in a public auction or institute a court action to recover unpaid subscriptions.
Comment:
The new Code permits business owners to pool capital from persons with varying interests. Personal
considerations are generally immaterial. Also, the new Code imposes and/or permits certain
restrictions. The new code prohibits the issuance or transfer of shares must to make the corporation in
breach of constitutional or legal requirements.
Comment:
The new Code imposes a liability on the director or officer who actively or passively consents to the
issuance of watered stocks for such constitutes fraud on creditors. Specifically, under the new Code,
he shall be solidarily liable, together with the concerned shareholder, for the difference between the
value of the actual consideration and the par or issued value of shares. However, the new Code also
provides him with an escape from liability, and that is through filing a written objection for its issuance
with the corporate secretary.
Comment:
The Revised Corporation Code fixed in subscription contract.
CORPORATION CODE
Section 68. Delinquency sale. – The board of directors may, by resolution, order the sale of
delinquent stock and shall specifically state the amount due on each subscription plus all accrued
interest, and the date, time and place of the sale which shall not be less than thirty (30) days nor more
than sixty (60) days from the date the stocks become delinquent. Notice of said sale, with a copy of
the resolution, shall be sent to every delinquent stockholder either personally or by registered mail.
The same shall furthermore be published once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper
of general circulation in the province or city where the principal office of the corporation is located.
Unless the delinquent stockholder pays to the corporation, on or before the date specified for the sale
of the delinquent stock, the balance due on his subscription, plus accrued interest, costs of
advertisement and expenses of sale, or unless the board of directors otherwise orders, said
delinquent stock shall be sold at public auction to such bidder who shall offer to pay the full amount of
the balance on the subscription together with accrued interest, costs of advertisement and expenses
of sale, for the smallest number of shares or fraction of a share. The stock so purchased shall be
transferred to such purchaser in the books of the corporation and a certificate for such stock shall be
issued in his favor. The remaining shares, if any, shall be credited in favor of the delinquent
stockholder who shall likewise be entitled to the issuance of a certificate of stock covering such
shares. Should there be no bidder at the public auction who offers to pay the full amount of the
balance on the subscription together with accrued interest, costs of advertisement and expenses of
sale, for the smallest number of shares or fraction of a share, the corporation may, subject to the
provisions of this Code, bid for the same, and the total amount due shall be credited as paid in full in
the books of the corporation. Title to all the shares of stock covered by the subscription shall be
vested in the corporation as treasury shares and may be disposed of by said corporation in
accordance with the provisions of this Code. (39a-46a)
TITLE VIII
CORPORATE BOOKS AND RECORDS
Comment:
The new Code enumerates several corporate books and records, instead of broadly referring to them
as containing “information relating to the corporation” the Code also illustrates other corporate books
and records, including corporate resolutions, copies of the latest reportorial requirement submitted to
the Commission and minutes of all meetings. The new Code does not require the corporation to
reproduce and provide copies of available records. However, the code allows a requesting party to to
demand in writing for the reproduction of records or excerpts from said records, provided that he pays
for the expenses of the reproduction.
Comment:
There is a threshold when CPA is necessary. Unlike the old code where the certification under oath
must be made by the treasurer or any responsible officer of the corporation, relative to the financial
statements of small corporations, the new Code only requires the certification under oath by the
treasurer and the president or the chief financial officer.
Comment:
The new code requires the articles of the merger or consolidation must reflect the carrying amounts
and fair values of the assets and liabilities of the respective companies as of the agreed cut-off date,
the method to be used in the merger or consolidation of accounts of the companies and the
provisional or pro forma values, as merged or consolidated, using the accounting method.
Comment:
The new Code permits a shareholder to withdraw from the corporation and compel it to pay for the fair
value of his shares, when a corporate action materially changes the fundamental assumptions when
the shareholder joined the corporation. Also, the new Code enumerates such changes which may be
classified it into broad categories.
Comment:
There is a change in form.
Comment:
The new code permits the members to vote in person or by proxy in all meetings of members. When
so authorized by the bylaws or by a majority of the board of trustees, the members may also vote
through remote communications or in absentia, provided the same is made before the corporation
finishes the tally of votes.
Comment:
The new Code permits bylaws of non-stock corporations to fix the term of trustees to less than or not
more than three years, unlike the old Code that fixed their term to three years. Further, the new Code
does not anymore mandate a classified board.
Comment:
Under the new Code, the concerned trustee or officer may be held criminally liable should there be an
unjustified failure to keep the membership book, and unjustified refusal to permit members ti inspect
them.
CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Section 94. Rules of distribution. – In case dissolution of a non-stock corporation in accordance
with the provisions of this Code, its assets shall be applied and distributed as follows: 1. All liabilities
and obligations of the corporation shall be paid, satisfied and discharged, or adequate provision shall
be made therefore; 2. Assets held by the corporation upon a condition requiring return, transfer or
conveyance, and whichcondition occurs by reason of the dissolution, shall be returned, transferred or
conveyed in accordance with such requirements; 3. Assets received and held by the corporation
subject to limitations permitting their use only for charitable, religious, benevolent, educational or
similar purposes, but not held upon a condition requiring return, transfer or conveyance by reason of
the dissolution, shall be transferred or conveyed to one or more corporations, societies or
organizations engaged in activities in the Philippines substantially similar to those of the dissolving
corporation according to a plan of distribution adopted pursuant to this Chapter; 4. Assets other than
those mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, if any, shall be distributed in accordance with the
provisions of the articles of incorporation or the by-laws, to the extent that the articles of incorporation
or the by-laws, determine the distributive rights of members, or any class or classes of members, or
provide for distribution; and 5. In any other case, assets may be distributed to such persons, societies,
organizations or corporations, whether or not organized for profit, as may be specified in a plan of
distribution adopted pursuant to this Chapter. (n)
Comment:
Under the new Code, there is not much revision done in this section except that it was more specific
by providing the portion of the section that states - “The assets of a nonstock corporation undergoing
the process of dissolution for reasons other than those set forth in Section 139 of this Code.
The articles of incorporation of a close corporation may provide that the business of the corporation
shall be managed by the stockholders of the corporation rather than by a board of directors. So long
as this provision continues in effect, no meeting of stockholders need be called to elect directors:
Provided, That the stockholders of the corporation shall be deemed to be directors for the purpose of
applying the provisions of this Code, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: Provided, further,
That the stockholders of the corporation shall be subject to all liabilities of directors.
The articles of incorporation may likewise provide that all officers or employees or that specified
officers or employees shall be elected or appointed by the stockholders, instead of by the board of
directors.
Comment:
The Articles of Incorporation from the Od Corporation Code and the New Corporation Code have no
substantial change. The change in only as to the form of presentation of the provision of the Articles of
incorporation and the situations that continue to take effect as long as the provision that the
stockholders shall manage the corporation rather than a board of directors. In the Old Corporation
Code, we can clearly see two distinct enumerations. The first are the provisions that an Article of
Incorporation may contain and the second are the situations that continue to take effect as long as the
provision that the stockholders shall manage the corporation rather than a board of directors. On the
other hand, the Revised Corporation Code merely enumerates the provisions that an Article of
Incorporation may contain while the situations that continue to take effect as long as the provision that
the stockholders shall manage the corporation rather than a board of directors are presented in
paragraph form.
Comment:
The new provision changes the old provision, specifying the roles and responsibility of the
administrators in the articles of incorporation.
CHAPTER III
ONE PERSON CORPORATIONS
REVISED CORPORATION CODE
SEC. 115. Applicability of Provisions to One Person Corporations. – The provisions of this Title
shall primarily apply to One Person Corporations. Other provisions of this Code apply suppletorily,
except as otherwise provided in this Title.
SEC. 116. One Person Corporation. – A One Person Corporation is a corporation with a single
stockholder: Provided, That only a natural person, trust, or an estate may form a One Person
Corporation.
Banks and quasi-banks, preneed, trust, insurance, public and publicly-listed companies, and non-
chartered government-owned and -controlled corporations may not incorporate as One Person
Corporations: Provided, further, That a natural person who is licensed to exercise a profession may
not organize as a One Person Corporation for the purpose of exercising such profession except as
otherwise provided under special laws.
SEC. 117. Minimum Capital Stock Not Required for One Person Corporation. – A One Person
Corporation shall not be required to have a minimum authorized capital stock except as otherwise
provided by special law.
SEC. 118. Articles of Incorporation. – A One Person Corporation shall file articles of incorporation
in accordance with the requirements under Section 14 of this Code. It shall likewise substantially
contain the following:
(a) If the single stockholder is a trust or an estate, the name, nationality, and residence of the trustee,
administrator, executor, guardian, conservator, custodian, or other person exercising fiduciary duties
together with the proof of such authority to act on behalf of the trust or estate; and
(b) Name, nationality, residence of the nominee and alternate nominee, and the extent, coverage and
limitation of the authority.
SEC. 119. Bylaws. – The One Person Corporation is not required to submit and file corporate bylaws.
SEC. 120. Display of Corporate Name. – A One Person Corporation shall indicate the letters “OPC”
either below or at the end of its corporate name.
SEC. 121. Single Stockholder as Director, President. – The single stockholder shall be the sole
director and president of the One Person Corporation.
SEC. 122. Treasurer, Corporate Secretary, and Other Officers. – Within fifteen (15) days from the
issuance of its certificate of incorporation, the One Person Corporation shall appoint a treasurer,
corporate secretary, and other officers as it may deem necessary, and notify the Commission thereof
within five (5) days from appointment.
The single stockholder may not be appointed as the corporate secretary.
A single stockholder who is likewise the self-appointed treasurer of the corporation shall give a bond
to the Commission in such a sum as may be required: Provided, That, the said stockholder/treasurer
shall undertake in writing to faithfully administer the One Person Corporation’s funds to be received as
treasurer, and to disburse and invest the same according to the articles of incorporation as approved
by the Commission. The bond shall be renewed every two (2) years or as often as may be required.
SEC. 123. Special Functions of the Corporate Secretary. – In addition to the functions designated
by the One Person Corporation, the corporate secretary shall:
(a) Be responsible for maintaining the minutes book and/or records of the corporation; (b) Notify the
nominee or alternate nominee of the death or incapacity of the single stockholder, which notice shall
be given no later than five (5) days from such occurrence; (c) Notify the Commission of the death of
the single stockholder within five (5) days from such occurrence and stating in such notice the names,
residence addresses, and contact details of all known legal heirs; and
(d) Call the nominee or alternate nominee and the known legal heirs to a meeting and advise the legal
heirs with regard to, among others, the election of a new director, amendment of the articles of
incorporation, and other ancillary and/or consequential matters.
SEC. 124. Nominee and Alternate Nominee. – The single stockholder shall designate a nominee
and an alternate nominee who shall, in the event of the single stockholder’s death or incapacity, take
the place of the single stockholder as director and shall manage the corporation’s affairs.
The articles of incorporation shall state the names, residence addresses and contact details of the
nominee and alternate nominee, as well as the extent and limitations of their authority in managing
the affairs of the One Person Corporation.
The written consent of the nominee and alternate nominee shall be attached to the application for
incorporation. Such consent may be withdrawn in writing any time before the death or incapacity of
the single stockholder.
SEC. 125. Term of Nominee and Alternate Nominee. – When the incapacity of the single
stockholder is temporary, the nominee shall sit as director and manage the affairs of the One Person
Corporation until the stockholder, by self determination, regains the capacity to assume such duties.
In case of death or permanent incapacity of the single stockholder, the nominee shall sit as director
and manage the affairs of the One Person Corporation until the legal heirs of the single stockholder
have been lawfully determined, and the heirs have designated one of them or have agreed that the
estate shall be the single stockholder of the One Person Corporation.
The alternate nominee shall sit as director and manage the One Person Corporation in case of the
nominee’s inability, incapacity, death, or refusal to discharge the functions as director and manager of
the corporation, and only for the same term and under the same conditions applicable to the nominee.
SEC. 126. Change of Nominee or Alternate Nominee. – The single stockholder may, at any time,
change its nominee and alternate nominee by submitting to the Commission the names of the new
nominees and their corresponding written consent. For this purpose, the articles of incorporation need
not be amended.
SEC. 127. Minutes Book. – A One Person Corporation shall maintain a minutes book which shall
contain all actions, decisions, and resolutions taken by the One Person Corporation.
SEC. 128. Records in Lieu of Meetings. – When action is needed on any matter, it shall be sufficient
to prepare a written resolution, signed and dated by the single stockholder, and recorded in the
minutes book of the One Person Corporation. The date of recording in the minutes book shall be
deemed to be the date of the meeting for all purposes under this Code.
SEC. 129. Reportorial Requirements. – The One Person Corporation shall submit the following
within such period as the Commission may prescribe:
(a) Annual financial statements audited by an independent certified public accountant: Provided, That
if the total assets or total liabilities of the corporation are less than Six Hundred Thousand Pesos
(P600,000.00), the financial statements shall be certified under oath by the corporation’s treasurer
and president; (b) A report containing explanations or comments by the president on every
qualification, reservation, or adverse remark or disclaimer made by the auditor in the latter’s report; (c)
A disclosure of all self-dealings and related party transactions entered into between the One Person
Corporation and the single stockholder; and
(d) Other reports as the Commission may require.
For purposes of this provision, the fiscal year of a One Person Corporation shall be that set forth in its
articles of incorporation or, in the absence thereof, the calendar year.
The Commission may place the corporation under delinquent status should the corporation fail to
submit the reportorial requirements three (3) times, consecutively or intermittently, within a period of
five (5) years.
SEC. 130. Liability of Single Shareholder. – A sole shareholder claiming limited liability has the
burden of affirmatively showing that the corporation was adequately financed.
Where the single stockholder cannot prove that the property of the One Person Corporation is
independent of the stockholder’s personal property, the stockholder shall be jointly and severally liable
for the debts and other liabilities of the One Person Corporation.
The principles of piercing the corporate veil applies with equal force to One Person Corporations as
with other corporations.
SEC. 131. Conversion from an Ordinary Corporation to a One Person Corporation. – When a
single stockholder acquires all the stocks of an ordinary stock corporation, the latter may apply for
conversion into a One Person Corporation, subject to the submission of such documents as the
Commission may require. If the application for conversion is approved, the Commission shall issue a
certificate of filing of amended articles of incorporation reflecting the conversion. The One Person
Corporation converted from an ordinary stock corporation shall succeed the latter and be legally
responsible for all the latter’s outstanding liabilities as of the date of conversion.
SEC. 132. Conversion from a One Person Corporation to an Ordinary Stock Corporation. – A
One Person Corporation may be converted into an ordinary stock corporation after due notice to the
Commission of such fact and of the circumstances leading to the conversion, and after compliance
with all other requirements for stock corporations under this Code and applicable rules. Such notice
shall be filed with the Commission within sixty (60) days from the occurrence of the circumstances
leading to the conversion into an ordinary stock corporation. If all requirements have been complied
with, the Commission shall issue a certificate of filing of amended articles of incorporation reflecting
the conversion.
In case of death of the single stockholder, the nominee or alternate nominee shall transfer the shares
to the duly designated legal heir or estate within seven (7) days from receipt of either an affidavit of
heirship or self-adjudication executed by a sole heir, or any other legal document declaring the legal
heirs of the single stockholder and notify the Commission of the transfer. Within sixty (60) days from
the transfer of the shares, the legal heirs shall notify the Commission of their decision to either wind
up and dissolve the One Person Corporation or convert it into an ordinary stock corporation.
The ordinary stock corporation converted from a One Person Corporation shall succeed the latter and
be legally responsible for all the latter’s outstanding liabilities as of the date of conversion.
Comment:
The new law provides Sec. 115- Sec. 132 which the old law does not have. This provisions allows and
provides rules on One Person Corporations which the old law did not recognize. It provides definition
of one person corporation and rules on Minimum Capital Stock Not Required for One Person
Corporation, Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, Display of Corporate Name, Single Stockholder as
Director, President, Treasurer, Corporate Secretary, and Other Officers, Special Functions of the
Corporate Secretary, Change of Nominee or Alternate Nominee, Minutes Book., Records in Lieu of
Meetings, Reportorial Requirements, Liability of Single Shareholder, Conversion from an Ordinary
Corporation to a One Person Corporation, and Conversion from a One Person Corporation to an
Ordinary Stock Corporation.
At least twenty (20) days prior to the meeting, notice shall be given to each shareholder or member of
record personally, by registered mail, or by any means authorized under its bylaws, whether or not
entitled to vote at the meeting, in the manner provided in Section 50 of this Code and shall state that
the purpose of the meeting is to vote on the dissolution of the corporation. Notice of the time, place,
and object of the meeting shall be published once prior to the date of the meeting in a newspaper
published in the place where the principal office of said corporation is located, or if no newspaper is
published in such place, in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines.
A verified request for dissolution shall be filed with the Commission stating: (a) the reason the date,
place, and time of the meeting in which the vote was made; and (e) details of publication.
The corporation shall submit the following to the Commission: (1) a copy of the resolution authorizing
the dissolution, certified by a majority of the board of directors or trustees and countersigned by the
secretary of the corporation; (2) proof of publication; and (3) favorable recommendation from the
appropriate regulatory agency, when necessary.
Within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the verified request for dissolution, and in the absence of any
withdrawal within said period, the Commission shall approve the request and issue the certificate of
dissolution. The dissolution shall take effect only upon the issuance by the Commission of a certificate
of dissolution.
No application for dissolution of banks, banking and quasi-banking institutions, preneed, insurance
and trust companies, nonstock savings and loan associations, pawnshops, and other financial
intermediaries shall be approved by the Commission unless accompanied by a favorable
recommendation of the appropriate government agency. for the dissolution; (b) the form, manner, and
time when the notices were given; (c) names of the stockholders and directors or members and
trustees who approved the dissolution; (d)
Comment:
Under the old provision it provides that a resolution may duly adopted by the affirmative vote of the
stockholders owning at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock or of at least two-thirds
(2/3) of the members of a meeting to be held upon call of the directors or trustees. While the new law
provides that a resolution may be adopted by the affirmative vote of the stockholders owning at least
majority of the outstanding capital stock or majority of the members of a meeting to be held upon the
call of the directors or trustees. It also includes that No application for dissolution of banks, banking
and quasi-banking institutions, preneed, insurance and trust companies, nonstock savings and loan
associations, pawnshops, and other financial intermediaries shall be approved by the Commission
unless accompanied by a favorable recommendation of the appropriate government agency. for the
dissolution; (b) the form, manner, and time when the notices were given; (c) names of the
stockholders and directors or members and trustees who approved the dissolution.
Comment:
The new provision specifies the content of the petition which states that; The petition shall state: (a)
the reason for the dissolution; (b) the form, manner, and time when the notices were given; and (c) the
date, place, and time of the meeting in which the vote was made. The corporation shall submit to the
Commission the following: (1) a copy of the resolution authorizing the dissolution, certified by a
majority of the board of directors or trustees and countersigned by the secretary of the corporation;
and (2) a list of all its creditors. This phrases cannot be found in the old provision. This gives the
corporation a clear view on what to write on a petition. This would give clear view on how should a
provision be made exactly.
Comment:
The new provision added the effect of the expiration of the shortened term which states that: upon the
expiration of the shortened term, as stated in the approved amended articles of incorporation, the
corporation shall be deemed dissolved without any further proceedings, subject to the provisions of
this Code on liquidation. In the case of expiration of corporate term, dissolution shall automatically
take effect on the day following the last day of the corporate term stated in the articles of
incorporation, without the need for the issuance by the Commission of a certificate of dissolution. The
old law only provides for the affectivity of the shortening of the corporate term.
Comment:
Section 137 does not have counterpart provision in the old Corporation Code. This provision provides
for the rules on the Withdrawal of request and petition for dissolution. Which states that A withdrawal
of the request for dissolution shall be made in writing. The withdrawal shall be submitted no later than
fifteen (15) days from receipt by the Commission of the request for dissolution. A withdrawal of the
petition for dissolution shall be in the form of a motion and similar in substance to a withdrawal of
request for dissolution but shall be verified and filed prior to publication of the order setting the
deadline for filing objections to the petition.
Comment:
The new provision provides specific grounds for an involuntary dissolution which are: Non-use
of corporate charter as provided under Section 21 of this Code; Continuous inoperation of a
corporation as provided under Section 21 of this Code; Upon receipt of a lawful court order dissolving
the corporation; Upon finding by final judgment that the corporation procured its incorporation through
fraud; and Upon finding by final judgment that the corporation was created for the purpose of
committing, concealing or aiding the commission of securities violations, smuggling, tax evasion,
money laundering, or graft and corrupt practices and committed or aided in the commission of
securities violations, smuggling, tax evasion, money laundering, or graft and corrupt practices, and its
stockholders knew of the same; and (3) Repeatedly and knowingly tolerated the commission of graft
and corrupt practices or other fraudulent or illegal acts by its directors, trustees, officers, or
employees. If the corporation shall be ordered dissolved its assets, after payment of its liabilities,
shall, upon petition of the Commission with the appropriate court, be forfeited in favor of the national
government. Such forfeiture shall be without prejudice to the rights of innocent stockholders and
employees for services rendered, and to the application of other penalty or sanction under this Code
or other laws.
SEC. 139. Corporate Liquidation. – Except for banks, which shall be covered by the applicable
provisions of Republic Act No. 7653, otherwise known as the “New Central Bank Act”, as amended,
and Republic Act No. 3591, otherwise known as the “Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation
Charter”, as amended, every corporation whose charter expires pursuant to its articles of
incorporation, is annulled by forfeiture, or whose corporate existence is terminated in any other
manner, shall nevertheless remain as a body corporate for three (3) years after the effective date of
dissolution, for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits by or against it and enabling it to settle
and close its affairs, dispose of and convey its property, and distribute its assets, but not for the
purpose of continuing the business for which it was established.
At any time during said three (3) years, the corporation is authorized and empowered to convey all of
its property to trustees for the benefit of stockholders, members, creditors and other persons in
interest. After any such conveyance by the corporation of its property in trust for the benefit of its
stockholders, members, creditors and others in interest, all interest which the corporation had in the
property terminates, the legal interest vests in the trustees, and the beneficial interest in the
stockholders, members, creditors or other persons-in-interest.
Except as otherwise provided for in Sections 93 and 94 of this Code, upon the winding up of corporate
affairs, any asset distributable to any creditor or stockholder or member who is unknown or cannot be
found shall be escheated in favor of the national government.
Except by decrease of capital stock and as otherwise allowed by this Code, no corporation shall
distribute any of its assets or property except upon lawful dissolution and after payment of all its debts
and liabilities.
Comment:
The new provision exempts other corporations from corporate liquidation such as banks, which shall
be covered by the applicable provisions of Republic Act No. 7653, otherwise known as the “New
Central Bank Act”, as amended, and Republic Act No. 3591, otherwise known as the “Philippine
Deposit Insurance Corporation Charter”, as amended. This applies a thin line on the corporations that
are governed by this code and the specific corporation which are governed by RA 7653 and RA 3519.
The new code also changes the effect of winding up corporate affairs which states that except as
otherwise provided for in Sections 93 and 94 of this Code, upon the winding up of corporate affairs,
any asset distributable to any creditor or stockholder or member who is unknown or cannot be found
shall be escheated in favor of the national government. While the old provision provides that it should
be escheated in favor of the city or municipality where such assets are located.
Within sixty (60) days after the issuance of the license to transact business in the Philippines, the
licensee, except foreign banking or insurance corporations, shall deposit with the Commission for the
benefit of present and future creditors of the licensee in the Philippines, securities satisfactory to the
Commission, consisting of bonds or other evidence of indebtedness of the Government of the
Philippines, its political subdivisions and instrumentalities, or of government-owned or -controlled
corporations and entities, shares of stock or debt securities that are registered under Republic Act No.
8799, otherwise known as “The Securities Regulation Code”, shares of stock in domestic corporations
listed in the stock exchange, shares of stock in domestic insurance companies and banks, any
financial instrument determined suitable by the Commission, or any combination thereof with an
actual market value of at least Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) or such other amount that
may be set by the Commission: Provided, however, That within six (6) months after each fiscal year of
the licensee, the Commission shall require the licensee to deposit additional securities or financial
instruments equivalent in actual market value to two percent (2%) of the amount by which the
licensee’s gross income for that fiscal year exceeds Ten million pesos (P10,000,000.00).
The Commission shall also require the deposit of additional securities or financial instruments if the
actual market value of the deposited securities or financial instruments has decreased by at least ten
percent (10%) of their actual market value at the time they were deposited. The Commission may, at
its discretion, release part of the additional deposit if the gross income of the licensee has decreased,
or if the actual market value of the total deposit has increased, by more than ten percent (10%) of
their actual market value at the time they were deposited.
The Commission may, from time to time, allow the licensee to make substitute deposits for those
already on deposit as long as the licensee is solvent. Such licensee shall be entitled to collect the
interest or dividends on such deposits. In the event the licensee ceases to do business in the
Philippines, its deposits shall be returned, upon the licensee’s application and upon proof to the
satisfaction of the Commission that the licensee has no liability to Philippine residents, including the
Government of the Republic of the Philippines. For purposes of computing the securities deposit, the
composition of gross income and allowable deductions therefrom shall be in accordance with the rules
of the Commission.
Comment:
This section provides the requirement of foreign corporation to give bond after the issuance of the
license to transact business within the country. Amongst the changes made is the removal of RA
5186, from Sec. 126 of the CC, replaced by RA 8799 otherwise known as “The Securities Regulation
Code” as the basis of shares of stock or debt securities acceptable and inclusion of any financial
instrument determined suitable by the Commission as sources of bonds given. The amount of bond to
be given is increased to at least Five hundred thousand pesos (P 500,000.00) or any other amount
may be set by the Commission. Deposit of additional securities or financial instrument required of
foreign corporation is now base on a gross income in excess of Ten million pesos (P 10,000,000.00)
for the fiscal year. The RCC also emphasize that the composition of the gross income and deductions
therefrom shall be in accordance with the rule of the Commission. The increase in bond requirement
is beneficial to the persons having unpaid claims and provides peace of mind to the corporation that
there is a fund that will aid him in paying the former. The increase is only timely as the economy is
also growing. The added provision on computation of gross income is deemed proper so as the
foreign corporation wouldn’t be confused as how to compute its gross income for bond purposes.
Comment:
This section included a qualification for a domestic corporation to become a resident agent. The same
is advantageous for foreign corporations. The possible trouble in designating a domestic corporation
as a resident agent is that it might cease operation or go bankrupt, prompting the foreign corporation
to select and assign anew. With the newly required qualifications, later will be secured that their
chosen resident agent will not cease operation anytime soon, eliminating the trouble of assigning a
new one. However, this would mean additional paper work for the foreign corporation but I believe the
same can be easily complied with.
Comment:
Sections 154 to 172, Title XVI (Investigations, Offenses, and Penalties) of the RCC are new
provisions. The Code empowers the Commission to properly administer, investigate and prosecute
violations of its provisions. In this title, several powers of the Commission under the Securities
Regulation Code have been re-stated. The Commission can investigate any violation of the Code, rule
or regulation or its own order. It can publish its findings, administer oath, subpoena witnesses and
documents, issue cease and desist orders, and cite persons in contempt. This section particularly vest
the Commission the authority to supervise corporations and persons acting on their behalf and
provide sanctions for violation of the code, its rules and orders. Corporations are safeguarded by RA
10173, otherwise known as the “Data Privacy Act of 2012’’, and other pertinent law against the
Commission’s authority to publish its findings, orders, etc. The same authority is beneficial to other
corporations as it will alert them against corporations at fault.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN THE CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
Sections 154 to 172, Title XVI (Investigations, Offenses, and Penalties) of the RCC are new
provisions. This particular section vest the Commission, through the Congress, to administer oaths,
subpoena witnesses and documents. The Commission is vested with authority to cite a person in
contempt for violation of its subpoena. With this authority, corporations must be participative in
heeding the Commission’s request for the presence of certain individual or documents. Violation of
the same may result to administrative or criminal sanctions, as provided by the subsequent sections
under this title.
NB: NO COUNTERPART IN THE CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Thereafter, the Commission may proceed administratively against such person in accordance with
Section 158 of this Code, and/or transmit evidence to the Department of Justice for preliminary
investigation or criminal prosecution and/or initiate criminal prosecution for any violation of this Code,
rule, or regulation.
Comment:
Sections 154 to 172, Title XVI (Investigations, Offenses, and Penalties) of the RCC are new
provisions. The Commission is vested the power to issues Cease and Desist Order (CDO) under
Section 5(i) of the Securities Regulation Code (SRC). Under the Securities Regulation Code, CDO
may be issued ex parte or without necessary hearing and may only be issued upon finding that the
act, unless retrained, will likely cause “significant, imminent, and irreparable danger or injury to public
safety or welfare”. The grounds provided for by this section for the issuance of a CDO is different from
that provided in Sections 53 and 64 of the SRC. Corporations on their end need to at least be aware
of the grounds provided by under the Code and the SRC.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
Sections 154 to 172, Title XVI (Investigations, Offenses, and Penalties) of the RCC are new
provisions. Both Sections 157 and 158 of the Code provides for the administrative sanctions.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
Sections 154 to 172, Title XVI (Investigations, Offenses, and Penalties) of the RCC are new
provisions. Both Sections 157 and 158 of the Code provides for the administrative sanctions. This
section provides for certain administrative sanctions, namely: administrative fine, injunction,
suspension or revocation of the certificate of incorporation, dissolution, and/or, in certain cases,
forfeiture of assets. Responsible director, trustee or officer may be removed from office. His penalty
may include permanent disqualification or bar from appointment as director, trustee or officer.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This section modifies the penalties on unauthorized use of a corporate name which punished of ten
thousand pesos to two hundred thousand pesos which from the corporation code it only penalized
from using unauthorized name not less than one thousand pesos to ten thousand pesos with and
imprisonment of not less than 30 days but not more than 5 years or both.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This law provides is a members or stockholder may fine penalties from ten thousand to two hundred
thousand pesos as penalties to members or stockholders who violates on ground for disqualification
in sec. of this code, but as this law provides if the violation is injurious to the public it increases the
penalty from twenty thousand up to four hundred thousand pesos.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This law provides penalties to corporation by refusing to inspection their records of the company. It
provides fine on failure to comply the records of the company of ten thousand to two hundred
thousand at the discretion of the court. However, this law increases the penalty if such violation or
failure to comply is injurious or detrimental to the public in twenty thousand pesos up to two hundred
thousand pesos.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This law also penalizes any person or auditor who made the report in which incomplete, inaccurate,
false, or misleading information or statements will be fine of twenty thousand pesos to two hundred
thousand pesos. However, when such person wrongful information is injurious or detrimental to public
he may fine of forty thousand pesos to four hundred thousand pesos.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This law also emphasizes the penalty of an independent auditor despite of its incompleteness or
inaccuracy however failure to give fair and accurate presentation containing false or misleading
statement shall me fine of eighty thousand pesos to five hundred thousand pesos in which is such
violation cause injury to the public may increase to one hundred thousand pesos to six hundred
thousand pesos.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This law also penalized to those who is responsible of fraud or assisted directly or indirectly which did
not specify in corporation code fines two hundred thousand pesos to two million pesos when such
fraud cause injurious or detrimental to the public it increases to four hundred thousand pesos up to
five million pesos as penalty to the violation of this provision.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
The new law also implements penalties to fraudulent conduct of business of two thousand pesos to
two million pesos. However, such penalty of this violation will increase if the fraudulent conduct may
cause injurious or detrimental to the public in increases to four hundred thousand pesos up to five
million pesos as the law provides.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This section provides penalties to such corporation who is used for fraud or to conceal graft and
corrupt practices as provided under this code shall be liable of one hundred thousand pesos to five
million pesos. Such members/stockholders engaged in graft and corrupt practices and the corporation
failed to install such pact of graft and corrupt shall be prima facie evidence of the corporate liability
under this section.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
The new law also provides penalties to a person who is appointed as mediator but such appointed
person engages into graft and corrupt practices on the corporation he is being appointed. The
offender shall be punished and fine as this provision impose of one hundred thousand pesos up to
one million pesos.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
Revise Corporation Code also provides penalties to directors, trustees, or other officer who has
knowledge of the offense in which fails to report, sanction, or file an action to the proper authority.
Instead, it tolerates such act or omission of the offender. Such offense the person who tolerates the
corrupt practices shall be punish with a fine of five hundred thousand pesos to one million pesos.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This law also provides protection to person who stands as whistleblower or the one who reveals such
offense of the offender who made an act or omission which violate the provision of this code. Any
people who may catch have intention to retaliate to the person who reveals such act may upon the
discretion of the court fines one hundred thousand pesos to one million pesos.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
The revised corporation code also provides separate liability to other violation of this code in which did
not stated however, such act or omission it violates the provision of the code. The law imposed a fine
of ten thousand pesos to one million pesos with specifying that if the offender is a corporation it will
undergone notice and hearing and and such corporation be dissolved before such appropriate
proceedings. Provided that such dissolution the offender must be penalize as up to the extent of his
offense and be given an appropriate action of his offense and it provides that this section may not
cause to affect for dissolution of this code and provides also that the liability of the offender is
separate from the any other administrative, civil, or criminal liability of the offender under this new law.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This section provides also on the liability of such directors, trustees, officers, or other employees that
the court may penalize as his discretion and imposed to such directors, trustees, stockholders,
members, officers or employees for the violation of the committed offense.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
This law provides also is a person is called aid, abet, counsel, command, induce, or cause any
violation of the code may be punish as imposed by this new law in which the fines will be define by the
court as to the extent of their participation of the offense. However, such fine as this law provides that
the penalty will not be exceeding to the penalty of what being imposed to the principal offender.
NB: NO COUNTER PART IN CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Comment:
The RCC has set forth a specific list that shall form part of the fund for its operational expenses. It
also added a provision regarding the collection and use of registration in order for the implementation
of such Code to be more effective or operative.
Maximum limits may be set by the Batasang Pambansa for stockholdings in corporations declared by
it to be vested with a public interest pursuant to the provisions of this section, belonging to individuals
or groups of individuals related to each other by consanguinity or affinity or by close business
interests, or whenever it is necessary to achieve national objectives, prevent illegal monopolies or
combinations in restraint or trade, or to implement national economic policies declared in laws, rules
and regulations designed to promote the general welfare and foster economic development.
Comment:
The provisions in the OCC required that it is the BATASANG PAMBANSA, which was the former
parliament of the Philippines, that has the power or duty to set maximum limits for stock ownership,
shall also be the recommending board in the declaration of who has public interest. Under the RCC, it
is now the CONGRESS who has such power and duties.
Comment:
The RCC specifically stated in Sec. 177 the annual submission of reportorial requirements such as
the audited financial statements – such is not stated in the Old Corporation Code. It also included a
provision on the consequences should the corporation fail to submit any of the reportorial
requirements.
CORPORATION CODE OF 1980
Section 142. Confidential nature of examination results. – All interrogatories propounded by the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the answers thereto, as well as the results of any
examination made by the Commission or by any other official authorized by law to make an
examination of the operations, books and records of any corporation, shall be kept strictly confidential,
except insofar as the law may require the same to be made public or where such interrogatories,
answers or results are necessary to be presented as evidence before any court
Comment:
The RCC did not eliminate the provision stated in the OCC regarding the confidential nature or
examination results but added only provisions regarding the visitorial power of the commission.
Comment:
The RCC included a detailed provision as compared to the Old Corporation Code, regarding the
functions and powers of the SEC.
Comment:
The Revised Corporation Code was crafted to better suit the modern times. It included an additional
section which mandates the SEC to develop and implement an electronic filing and monitoring
system, which is a practice that is not recognized in the old law.
Comment:
Arbitration agreements were also embedded in articles of incorporation or bylaws in the Revised
Corporation Copde. The Revised Code allows for an arbitration agreement to be provided in the
articles of incorporation (AOI) or bylaws of a corporation. With such an agreement in place, disputes
between the corporation, its stockholders or members that arise from the implementation of AOI or
bylaws or from intracorporate relations shall now be referred to arbitration. Disputes involving criminal
offenses or the interests of third parties remain non-arbitrable.
SEC. 182. Jurisdiction Over Party-List Organizations. – The powers, authorities, and
responsibilities of the Commission involving party-list organizations are transferred to the Commission
on Elections (COMELEC).
Within six (6) months after the effectivity of this Act, the monitoring, supervision, and regulation of
such corporations shall be deemed automatically transferred to the COMELEC.
For this purpose, the COMELEC, in coordination with the Commission, shall promulgate the
corresponding implementing rules for the transfer of jurisdiction over the abovementioned
corporations.
Comment:
Under the new law, jurisdiction over party-list organizations is transferred from the SEC to the
Commission on Elections (COMELEC), subject to the implementing rules to be jointly promulgated by
the SEC and the COMELEC.
Comment:
The intent and purpose of both are the same, only the form or sentence-structure was changed.
Comment
The intent and purpose of both are the same, only the form or sentence-structure was changed.
Comment
The intent and purpose of both are the same, only the form or sentence-structure was changed.
Comment:
The RCC now expressly stated the repeal of Batas Pambansa Blg. 68 or the Old Corporation Code.
However, the intent and purpose of the subsequent statements of both are the same, only the
enumeration such “laws or parts thereof” stated in the Old Corporation Code is added to the RCC
Repealing Clause.
Comment:
The RCC changed its Effectivity Clause from taking effect immediately upon approval to requiring the
completion of its publication before taking effect.