Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revision Project Space Final Portfolio
Revision Project Space Final Portfolio
English 115
Professor Beadle
30 September, 2019
Have you ever thought about what strategies authors use to convince their readers? An
article or text needs to use some type of strategy in order for the author’s claim to be presented to
the readers effectively. The most effective way to satisfy the readers is to use the three rhetorical
strategies and these include Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. Out of the three articles about happiness
one article stands out. Sonja Lyubomirsky, a psychologist conducted some serious research in
2016 about happiness in her article, “How Happy Are You and Why?”, she provides the most
compelling argument compared to David Brooks’ article, “What suffering does”, and Graham
Hill’s article, “Living With Less. A Lot Less”. Lyubomirsky uses the three rhetorical strategies
equally to back-up her argument and intertwine with one another making her claim stronger and
more reliable.
In Brooks’ article, “What Suffering Does”, he claims that people become different in
experience of suffering. He may have used all three strategies throughout his article, but he was
relying mostly with Logos and somewhat Ethos, and Pathos rather than using all three strategies
equally. Firstly, he uses ethos as his introduction explaining who he is, what he has
accomplished, and why the readers should read his article. Although he used Ethos, he only used
it once and it was his opening paragraph which consist of his background,“ Since 2003, David
Brooks has written a regular opinion column for the New York Times…..” (Brooks 284). His
Lopez 2
background may help him gain credibility, but his claim wouldn’t be as strong if he only relies
on his background, rather than using more Ethos in his paragraphs. Brooks used Logos four
times when he mentioned some famous people like Paul Tillich, a German-American Christian
theologian and philosopher, Franklin Roosevelt, the thirty-second President of the United States,
Abraham Lincoln, sixteenth president of the United States, and Victor Franklin, a
psychotherapist and psychologist. Victor Franklin said “Recovering from suffering is not like
recovering from disease. Many people don’t come out healed; they come out different.” (Brooks
287). Even if he used logos multiple times, Lyubomirsky provided more evidence by including
statistics, bar graphs, and other researches that Brooks didn’t have as Ethos. Lastly Brooks only
used pathos once, when he mentions, “ Well, I’m feeling a lot of pain over the loss of my child. I
should try to balance my hedonic account by going to a lott of parties and whooping it up.”
(Brooks 286). Compare to Brooks, Lyubomirsky conducted some more research based on
multiple people with their experience that will further have more explanation throughout this
essay. Like Brooks, Hill didn’t take advantage of the strategies since he is relying more on his
In Hill’s article, “Living With Less. A lot less”, he claims that material things could help
us from being sad. He is using his experience and some little research to strengthen his argument,
“My experiences show that after a certain point, material objects have a tendency to crowd out
the emotional needs they are meant to support. I wouldn’t trade a second spent wandering the
streets of Bangkok with Olga for anything I owed.” (Hill 312). Most of his article is just talking
about his personal experience of his happiness which is Pathos, but his claim wouldn’t be
supported strongly if he only relies on his experience. In addition to that he also use ethos and
Lopez 3
logos only when he mentioned about the statistics of UCLA’s research, “ In a study published
last year titled “Life at Home in the Twenty-First Century,” researchers at U.C.L.A. observed 32
middle-class Los Angeles families and found that all mother’s stress hormones spiked during the
time they spent dealing with their belongings.” (Hill 310). This is Ethos since he uses UCLA as a
credible school and could be also logos at the same time since it’s a piece of evidence or example
for his claim. Both Logos and Ethos are intertwined, but he should have provided more
intertwined strategies throughout his article to convince more readers of his point just like how
Lyubomirsky did. He may have used ethos and logos, but his article is constructed based on his
personal experience which ties up more with the pathos strategy. Lyubomirsky used the three
rhetorical Strategies more than Brooks and Hill since both didn’t use the strategies that much
compared to Lyubomirsky. Lyubomirsky uses them more equally rather than relying on one or
Lyubomirsky’s article, “ How Happy Are You and Why?”, argues that even though our
happiness is fifty percent genetic and circumstances is ten percent, we still have forty percent to
change our moods and find what truly makes us happy. She accumulated all her research about
happiness with various aspects from various researchers. In addition to that she used the three
rhetorical strategies equally more often since her article is longer than Brooks’ and Hill’s and the
more information the more she uses the strategies, the more satisfaction the audience will
receive, meaning Lyubomirsky has more Logos, Ethos, and Pathos provided due to the amount
of research she had done and converge it into one article. First she started her article by using
ethos and pathos, when she mentioned her background just like Brooks and Hill. Another ethos
strategy was when she used one of the researchers mentioning, “The fountain of happiness lies
Lopez 4
not in changing our genetically determined set points, for they are, by definition, resistant to
change, influence, or control.” (Lyubomirsky 195). This quote is ethos with the sense that she
used someone’s work to back up her claim and this quote is from John Mason Good, a English
writer on medical, religion, and classical subjects. Lyubomirsky then use pathos when she
scheduled some interviews from Randy, Angela, Shannon, James, Randy, and the other people
with their real-life situations, “When Shannon feels particularly insecure…”, “... Angela
considers herself a very happy person.”, and “Today Randy is one of those people everyone them
smile and laugh.” (Lyubomirsky 180-183). Lastly her Logos is used when she put some
Statistics, pie-chart, bar-graph, and even some examples like the people she interviewed. Aside
from being Logos the charts and the interviews can also be both pathos and ethos since the
interviews catches some emotions and it helps Lyubomirsky gain credibility by using people’s
work with authority. We can see that Lyubomirsky’s article uses the rhetorical strategies more
effectively than Brooks and Hill, meaning she uses the rhetorical strategies multiple times.
Hence, even though Brooks and Hill used rhetorical strategies, Lyubomirsky’s article, “
How happy are you and why?” uses the three rhetorical strategies; Ethos, Pathos, and Logos
more effectively than Brooks’, “What suffering does”, and Hill’s, “Living with less. A lot
less”.She expanded her research and as a result she has more evidence, credibility and shared
esides she uses the three rhetorical strategies to back-up her claim
emotions with the audience . B
and intertwine the strategies making her argument stronger and reliable. Lyubomirsky’s research
tend to provide more evidence to prove that she had thought about it, meaning a long process to
Lopez 5
Works Cited:
Brooks, David, “What Suffering Does.” Pursuing Happiness, edited by Matthew Parfitt and
Hill, Graham. “Living with Less. A lot Less.” Pursuing Happiness, edited by Matthew Parfitt
and
Lyubomirsky, Sonja. “How Happy Are You and Why?” Pursuing Happiness, edited by Matthew
Parfitt and Dawn Skorczewski, Bedford St. Martin’s 2016, pp. 179-197.