Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sospechosos and Genocidio-Response Jhenson
Sospechosos and Genocidio-Response Jhenson
L6-002
Written Responses
11 July 2018
“Sospechosos”
The documentary about racism is divided in three parts:”La memoria colectiva”, “Des-
Encuentros urbanos” and “Hacia un mundo con otros mundos”. All of these parts focus
on the discrimination that Afro-Ecuadorians suffered in the capital city, Quito, and
analyze the reasons for this discrimination.
First, the film gives a brief explanation of the main cause of the migration of people from
the Esmeraldas region to Quito. The culprit of the migration according to the video is the
shrimp industry because it is destroying the mangrove. Consequently, people left their
hometown for finding a new lifestyle and new job opportunities. However, when Afro-
Ecuadorians arrived in Quito many people were afraid of them because mestizos believe
that people of color are criminals. In one interview in the video, Alexander Quiñonez
says,” when I went to buy bread and the seller was afraid of me and looked at me rarely”.
In spite of these problems, Afro-Ecuadorians need to have fun so in the days the film was
produced so they usually met at the Carolina Park in order to play football or hang out
with friends.
Second, at the Carolina Park, the Ecuadorian Police made an operative to find criminals
then they started to check all people of color because the police officers believed that
some Afro-descendants were consuming drugs and committing crimes. As a result, 23
Afro-descendants were arrested, but the police officers had not verified if those arrested
were the criminals since the police arrested people in a random way. The police were in
an embarrassing situation, but they argued that the police officers had acted according to
the law because in Art 606, Literal 12 of the constitution, it is stated that the police should
arrest people who maintain a suspicious attitude and are in non-recreational places.
Nevertheless, the Afro-Ecuadorians were in a recreational place and they were arrested
for their skin color. On the other hand, some television companies documented the police
operative and the majority of Ecuadorians started to make false judgments about the
detainees. In fact, in an important television program called “VCT”, a presenter gave a
comment of hatred and racism against the Afro-Ecuadorians. Subsequently, this event
was considered an act of racism caused by the Ecuadorian police.
Third, the human rights of Afro-Ecuadorians arrested were violated. The police violated
the constitution because they did not give the right to defend themselves to Afro-
Ecuadorians. In fact, the report of the police does not include the public defense and the
versions of the detainees was used against them. In addition, the guarantees of the
detainees such as the honor, the dignity and the protection of their image were violated
because the police allowed television companies to document the arrests and spread it to
the public opinion. The main right violated was equality because the police officers
believed that the 23 Afro-Ecuadorians arrested were guilty because of their skin color.
To conclude, the government minister and the “Defensoria Del Pueblo” sanctioned the
acts of aggression and discrimination against the Afro-Ecuadorians caused by the police.
Then the government agencies decided that the commissar should be removed and the
police officer in charge of the operation should be sanctioned. Furthermore, Fernando
Bustamante, the government minister, apologized to the 23 Afro-Ecuadorians and he
described the police operation as a discriminatory event. However, Alexander Quiñonez
says, “We do not need apologies but real actions”.