Uber drivers experience friction in their operating model with Uber in several ways: 1) Drivers are independent contractors rather than employees, leaving them without protections or input in decisions. 2) Drivers have no say in the 20% commission taken by Uber which Uber is trying to increase further. 3) Driver ratings are sometimes unfairly harsh without opportunity for drivers to object. 4) UberPool rides can take drivers long distances without compensation. 5) Drivers face harsh penalties for cancelling rides even if for unavoidable reasons.
Uber drivers experience friction in their operating model with Uber in several ways: 1) Drivers are independent contractors rather than employees, leaving them without protections or input in decisions. 2) Drivers have no say in the 20% commission taken by Uber which Uber is trying to increase further. 3) Driver ratings are sometimes unfairly harsh without opportunity for drivers to object. 4) UberPool rides can take drivers long distances without compensation. 5) Drivers face harsh penalties for cancelling rides even if for unavoidable reasons.
Original Description:
Original Title
Friction with driver’s in Uber’s operating model_.docx
Uber drivers experience friction in their operating model with Uber in several ways: 1) Drivers are independent contractors rather than employees, leaving them without protections or input in decisions. 2) Drivers have no say in the 20% commission taken by Uber which Uber is trying to increase further. 3) Driver ratings are sometimes unfairly harsh without opportunity for drivers to object. 4) UberPool rides can take drivers long distances without compensation. 5) Drivers face harsh penalties for cancelling rides even if for unavoidable reasons.
Uber drivers experience friction in their operating model with Uber in several ways: 1) Drivers are independent contractors rather than employees, leaving them without protections or input in decisions. 2) Drivers have no say in the 20% commission taken by Uber which Uber is trying to increase further. 3) Driver ratings are sometimes unfairly harsh without opportunity for drivers to object. 4) UberPool rides can take drivers long distances without compensation. 5) Drivers face harsh penalties for cancelling rides even if for unavoidable reasons.
Drivers are one of the major stakeholders in UBER/Ola’s operating model.
The operating model is designed to bring the drivers and customers on a platform to create value for both the participants. But the friction arises in cases where uber doesn’t give due importance to their drivers. Some of the points are explained below: 1. Uber drivers are not employees of Uber and there exists no service contracts between them. This gives options and opportunities to uber to not extend any benefits to the driver and Uber is not bound by any contract when it is considered to the drivers. Uber tends to take undue advantage of this in order to raise commission and bring practices not favourable to the drivers. 2. The percentage share of profit per ride that is 20% is taken by Uber is set according to the terms by UBER and drivers do not have any say in it. Uber is trying to make these margins even thinner. Rest all other costs are borne by the driver itself. 3. The ratings are in some cases too harsh on part of the drivers where they do not have any opportunity to justify it or put their case forward wherein the ratings hamper their future rides and commissions. 4. In case of UBERPool it is a hassle for the drivers to go to long distance for rides which are not exactly on their routes and also this does not benefit the drivers in any case. Drivers are not very positive about pool services where multiple pool rides are clubbed together. 5. Harsh action for drivers cancelling their rides which can even be due to some unavoidable circumstances.