Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IS - 413 - Earthquake Resistance PDF
IS - 413 - Earthquake Resistance PDF
December 2013
91.120.25
1
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The amendment of 1998 was approved by technical committee 104 – characteristic loads on
structures with the following composition:
The second amendment sheet of this standard was prepared by an expert committee with
the following composition:
The second amendment sheet was approved by technical committee 104 – characteristic
loads on structures with the following composition:
2
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The third amendment sheet was prepared by technical committee 104 – characteristic loads
on structures with the following composition: Raz Mor, David Segal, Adrian Scarlet, Avraham
Pizanti, Rina Farchat, Avigdor Ruttenberg (chairman)
The third amendment sheet was approved by technical committee 104 – characteristic loads
on structures with the following composition
The following individuals have also contributed to the preparation of the third amendment
sheet: Naftali Eizenberg, Sam Freedman, Menachem Kenigsberg.
Moshe Carmel coordinated the amendment sheet preparation.
The fourth amendment sheet of this standard was prepared and approved, under an appeal
discussion, by the central committee 100 for building standards with the following
composition:
Kibbutz Industrial Association Eli Cohen
Association of chambers of commerce Shlomi Rozenberg
Technion – civil engineering department Rachel Beker
Israel Consumers Histadrut Talma Weinberger
Israel Association of Contractors David Katz (chairman), Haim Lev,
Aharon Sapir
Israel Association of Industrialists Gil Ashuach, Dan Trynin
Bureau of engineers and architects Israel David
Standard institution of Israel Dani Sneider
Public Works Company Shimon Nesichi
Ministry of defense Orna Raviv
Ministry of housing and building Leo Rubins
Ministry of the interior David Pilzer
Repr. of the Standards institution administration Helen Atarot
3
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The fifth amendment sheet was prepared by the expert committee 10401 – Earthquakes –
with the following composition:
Oren Lavan, Edi Leibovitz, Raz Mor (chairman), Rina Farchat, Asaf Keller, Doron Shalev
Yaron Ofir and Menachem Keninsberg also contributed to the amendment sheet
preparation.
The fifth amendment sheet was approved by the technical committee 104 – characteristic
loads on buildings, with the following composition:
Association of construction and infrastructures engineers – Edi Leibovitz
Technion – Civil engineering department Yiska Goldfeld, Oded Rabinovitz
Geological Institution Zohar Gvirzman
Bonei Haaretz Association Natan Chilo
Israel Electricity Corporation Arkadi Livshiz
Bureau of engineers and architects Paulin Weiz, Israel David (chairman), Shay
Forman
Ministry of Defense Claudia Renhorn
Ministry of building and housing Lezer Feldman
Consumers Histadrut Authority Rina Farchat
Elan Ben Noon, Yonatan Nachmani and Limor Argaman concentrated the fifth amendment
sheet preparation work.
4
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Descriptors:
The Israeli standards are reviewed from time to time, and at least once every five years, to
adapt to scientific and technological developments. The users of standards have to make
sure they are using the latest revision of the standard, including the amendment sheets.
Standard validity
This Israeli standard, including the amendments, enters into force from the time it is
published on the records.
Whoever producers a product that meets the requirements of the applicable Israeli
standards is allowed, upon permit from the standards institution of Israel, to label it with a
standard mark.
Copyrights
It is forbidden to copy, photocopy or disclose, in any way, this standard or parts of it,
without prior approval in writing from the standards institution of Israel.
5
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Table of contents
Preface 15
Chapter A – General matters 15
101. Standard applicability 15
102. References 15
103. Definitions 17
103.1 Accelerogram 17
103.2 Structure base 17
103.3 Story shear strength 17
103.4 Floor shear force 17
103.5 Collector 17
103.6 Low structure 17
104. List of symbols 22
105. Structure classification 30
105.1 Types of structures this standard applies to: 30
105.2 Types of structures this standard applies to (the applicable requirements
are stricter) 30
106. Documentation 31
107. Design inspection and execution 31
108. Instructions for additions, constructive changes and designation change
of structures (3A) 32
108.1 General 32
108.2 Structurally independent additions 32
108.3 Additions that are not structurally independent ...................... 32
108.3.1 Loads and displacements 32
108.3.2 Design 32
108.4 Change of designation 33
108.5 Change in existing structure without increasing its area and/or
designation change 33
108.5.1 General 33
108.5.2 Permissible changes 33
Chapter B – Data and features of the seismic activity 34
201. General 34
202. Environmental features 34
6
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
7
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
8
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
9
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
602.2.2 Floors 95
602.2.3 Maximum vertical distance between the foundation and tie member ..
95
602.2.4 Design of tie members 96
602.3 Impact of earthquake on the ground strength ........................ 96
603. Stability of retaining walls 96
603.1 Active force 98
603.2 Fixed or anchored walls 99
603.4 Passive force 100
604. Non-load bearing elements 100
604.1 Horizontal loads on non-load bearing structure elements ........ 100
604.2 Design of non-load bearing elements 101
604.3 Design of the connection of non-load bearing elements........... 101
604.4 Design of frame elements that are not part of the load bearing frame
system that resists a seismic load 101
Chapter F – design of reinforced concrete frame with high ductility level .............. 102
700. General instructions for seismic design of frames with high ductility level.
102
701. Design of beams for shear 102
702. Stirrups and shear reinforcement – minimum requirements .... 103
703. Design of shear reinforcement 104
704. Minimum dimensions of columns 105
705. Sensitive areas in columns 106
706. Intersections with high ductility level 109
706.1 Capacity of columns in relation to the beam capacity .............. 109
706.2 Design force to check for shear at an intersection ................... 109
706.3 Inspection of the intersection resistance to horizontal shear .... 113
706.4 Checking an intersection resistance to vertical shear ............... 115
707. Structures with a soft or weak story 116
Chapter H – design of ductile shear walls made of reinforced concrete with high ductility
level .......................... 116
801. General instructions for seismic design of ductile shear walls ... 116
802. Minimum dimensions .......................... 116
803. Sensitive areas in walls .......................... 118
Appendix A – Accelerometers .......................... 121
10
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
11
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
List of tables
12
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
List of figures
13
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-7: map Z for return period of 975 years (5%@50 years) for ground class B ......... 179
Figure H-8: map for the value TL (seconds) for return period of 975 years (5%@50 years) . 180
Figure H-9: map for return period of 2475 years (2%@50 years), VS30 = 760m/s (ground class
B) ............................................................................................................................ 181
Figure H-10: map for return period of 2475 years (2%@50 years), VS30 = 760m/s (ground
class B) .................................................................................................................... 182
Figure H-11: map for return period of 2475 years (2%@50 years) for ground class B ........ 183
Figure H-12: map for the value of TL (seconds) for return period of 2475 years (2%@50y). 184
14
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Preface
This standard specifies design requirements for structures designed to resist such an event.
The requirements are based on the latest information. The resistance of structures having
suitable ductility level is expressed in their ability to absorb energy when subjected to plastic
strains. The purpose of this standard is to ensure adequate resistance of the structures it
applies to, as follows:
The requirements of this standard do not apply to the types of structures specified
in section 105.2. Stricter requirements apply to these structures.
Note:
From the day this amendment sheet is published, AS no. 5 in the "records", both IS
413 of 1995 including its amendment sheet no. 1 of December 1998 and its
amendment sheet no. 2 of May 2004, and IS 413 of 1995 including its amendment
sheet of December 1998, its amendment sheet no. 2 of May 2004 and amendment
sheet no. 3 of September 2009, and IS 413 of 1995 including its amendment sheet
no. 1 of December 1998, amendment sheet no. 2 of May 2004, amendment sheet
no. 3 of September 2009 and its amendment sheet no. 5 of 2013, shall apply.
Meaning, this amendment sheet allows a transition period. During this period,
planners will be able to design structure resistance to earthquakes according to IS
413 of 1994 with its amendment sheets no. 1, 2, 3 and 5, or according to IS 413 of
1995 with its amendment sheets 1, 2 and 3
102. References
Standards and documents referred to in this standard:
15
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Israeli standards
IS 413 part 2.3 Design for earthquake resistance: engineering structures – raised
tanks for fluids and gases
IS 466 part 2 Concrete code: elements and systems of reinforced and non-
reinforced concrete
IS 466 part 4 Concrete code: elements and systems made of precast concrete
IS 466 part 5 Concrete code: ceilings made of prestressed precast hollow slabs
16
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The building and planning regulations (permit application, its conditions and tolls) –
1970, as amended
Foreign documents
ASCE – 7-10 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures
103. Definitions
The following definitions shall apply to this standard:
103.1 Accelerogram
Registration of the ground accelerations under an earthquake and their changing as
a function of time.
103.5 Collector
A structure element that transfers horizontal forces from the place of action to the
location of vertical elements in the system that resists these forces.
103.6.1 New low structure (until defined otherwise in the planning and building
regulations)
A one-story or two-story new residential structure, with a total building area of less
than 400 m2, that is located in an area where Z ≤ 0.075, that is not built with a
column floor and is made of a concrete frame or steel frame.
103.6.2 Existing low structure (until defined otherwise in the planning and building
regulations)
17
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
10.3.6.3 One-story storage structure with a roof span of less than 10-m with no overhead
crane;
10.3.6.4 One-story agricultural structure that is used for agricultural crops or animals;
103.6.5 Temporary or portable structure, of one or two story, whose duration of existence
at the site will not be more than 5 years.
A structure that deviates at least from one of the requirements for a regular
structure.
The ratio of the calculated floor rigidity in a given floor i and the calculated story
rigidity of the floor above it, or the ratio of the average of calculated story rigidities
of the three stories above it, all as relevant.
A system of frames that transfers the impact of horizontal forces mainly by bending
moments.
A system of vertical trusses that transfers the impact of horizontal forces mainly by
axial forces.
A system of spatial frames with no shear walls that is subjected to all loads (vertical
and horizontal), as specified in section 103.10 or section 103.11.
A system of single load bearing walls or coupled walls that is subjected to all loads
(vertical and horizontal).
A system that is subjected to all loads (vertical and horizontal), partly by moment
resisting spatial frames and partly by single load bearing walls or coupled walls or
braced frames.
18
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
A factor that depends on the structured type and the ductility level it was designed
for.
The design ductility level will be achieved by static scheme and reinforcement
details that ensure the structure behavior.
The use of the reduction factor is based on the structure capacity to develop plastic
hinges and maintain them all together, such that a brittle fracture that might
endanger the stability does not occur.
A factor that represents the financial-social importance of the structure and its
protection level.
A point in the ceiling of a given story i, where the resultant horizontal force passing
through it does not create rotation of the story ceiling around a vertical axis in
relation to the story's floor.
103.19 Ductility
Maximum difference between the drift of corresponding points on the floor and
ceiling of a given story, after movement.
An envelope line for the maximum response of an oscillator with one degree of
freedom and a given restraint factor, for ground movements originating from an
earthquake, as a function of the self-frequency of the oscillator.
103.22 Column
An element subjected to bending (1) and axial force that meets the requirements of
section 403.3.2.
19
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
An area limited by an element that is subjected to a moment that equals the section
capacity and can cause plastic rotation, while maintaining the capacity or while
limited increase of it.
An oscillation mode that corresponds with the basic period of time (definition
103.35).
103.25 Coupling
A story with horizontal rigidity that is smaller than the rigidity of the story above it
times 0.7, or the mean rigidity of the three stories above it times 0.8.
Notes:
Foundation columns story, or sheet pile walls (including walls made of piles one next
to the other) is considered an aboveground story and is inspected by the above
criteria and those in definition 103.27 (section 203.1).
In compacted soil, the soil resistance can be considered by its subsoil module factor
starting from a depth of 1-m as a minimum.
A story whose total strength for shear to resist horizontal forces is smaller in one of
the directions from the strength of the story above it (in the same direction) times
0.8 (section 203.1).
A pair of walls in the same plane that are connected at the lintels or tie beams in the
ceiling levels.
The moment required to obtain rotation around the center of rigidity of the ceiling
of a given story i in relation to the story floor at an angle of 1 radian.
20
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The required horizontal force to obtain parallel movement in the inspected direction
(story drift) in one length unit. This force equals the inverse of the story drift due to
the action of a horizontal unit force in that direction at the center of rigidity.
A square root of the ratio of the torsion rigidities of a given story i and its story
rigidity for parallel drift.
103.32 Beam
An element subjected to bending that in the worst case of design load combinations,
including seismic activity, carries an axial force as in the requirements of section
403.3.1.1.
A capability given to the entire structure and various elements in the structure, by
adequate design of the concrete sections and reinforcement, to develop plastic
hinges (definition 103.23) and absorb energy under dynamic conditions without
failure. This capability is given in this standard to structures made of reinforced
concrete in three different levels.
103.34 Frequency
Time defined in years, during which an earthquake that is worse than predicted will
not take place (by a given probability).
Fault that was defined by the Geological Institution as an active fault and that
appears on the updated map of the active and potentially active fault in Israel 1(1A)
(See appendix G).
A fault that is suspected as active faults as defined by the Geological Institution but
there is no proof to that, and it appears on the updated map of the active and
potentially active faults in Israel (1A) (see appendix G).
1
(1A) Definition of the Geological Institution for an active fault for the purpose of this standard: a
fault that has torn the surface at least once in the last 13,000 years.
21
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
An area of about 200-m on each side and edge of a fault trace (active fault and
potentially active fault). This is an area where there is high probability for repeated
action of one of the fault branches or sub-faults that were not yet located.
AL- longitudinal reinforcement section area on a beam (top and bottom together)
As1; as2 longitudinal reinforcement section areas on beam sections on both sides of
a column-beam junction
Asc – longitudinal tension reinforcement section area on a column (the larger area if
the reinforcement is not symmetrical)
Asc ' – longitudinal compression reinforcement section area on a column (the smaller
area if the reinforcement is not symmetrical)
Ash – total section areas of the stirrup branches (in each main direction) in a column
section; horizontal reinforcement section area on a wall; section areas of one branch
on a stirrup in a beam section
22
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Ah,max – peak expected horizontal ground acceleration (absolute value of the peak
acceleration, m per sec)
a'; b' – dimensions of a thickened edge section of a shear wall (figures 15, 22, 23)
B - wall thickness
bc – column width
Cdm – horizontal modal seismic design factor for mth oscillation mode
EWE – dynamic force as a result of pore water pressure behind a retaining wall
23
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
FHM – total horizontal modal design load for mth oscillation mode
Ftop – horizontal design load concentrated at the top of the structure under
earthquake impact
H – total height of the structure (m); height of a retaining wall above its base
24
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
hx'; hy' distance between axes of extreme longitudinal rebars in a column, in main
directions (figure 20)
i - number of the story in question; slope of the ground surface behind a retaining
wall, in relation to the horizon
K – force reduction factor for a structure, as specified in the corresponding table out
of tables 7, 5.
KPE – passive pressure factor at the feet of a retaining wall under earthquake
conditions
l1n; l2n – length of beams on both sides of a column-beam junction (between column
edges)
25
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
M – a mass that participates in the oscillation mode by its location on the structure
M1; M2 - Capacity moments on both edges of a beam span (with a symbol above to
state the trend)
Mu – bending capacity moment for the wall section, by the existing reinforcement
Pcs – a prestressing force that is caused by prestressing cords found on the central
third of the beam height, after prestressing losses
PGA – peak expected horizontal acceleration at the surface (in units of gravitational
acceleration, g)
PI – index of plasticity
SDS – spectral design acceleration under the impact of ground conditions at the site
for short cycle times (in units of gravitational acceleration g) (section 202.2.2)
26
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
SDI – spectral design acceleration under the impact of ground conditions at the site at
cycle time of one second (in units of gravitational acceleration g) (section 202.2.2)
Ss – horizontal spectral acceleration on a rock (ground type B) for a short cycle time
(in units of gravitational acceleration g) (section 202.1.1)
S1 – horizontal spectral acceleration on a rock (ground type B) for a cycle time of one
second (in units of gravitational acceleration g) (section 202.1.1)
T0 – cycle time on the limit between the first area and second area, as specified in
section 202.3 (seconds)
TL – cycle time on the border between the third area and the forth area (also called
the long corner cycle time) as specified in section 202.3 (seconds)
Ts – cycle time at the border between the second area and the third area (also called
the short corner cycle time) as specified in section 202.3 (seconds()
Vch – the concrete part that is subjected to horizontal shear force on a junction
Vcv – the concrete part that is subjected to vertical shear force at a junction
Vcw – the concrete part that is subjected to shear force in a shear wall
Vd – maximum shear force on a shear wall or tie beam on a braced shear wall
27
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Vs – mean speed of the shear wave in the top 30 meters of the subsoil (m per
second)
W – total weight of the structure above the floor of a given story; the weight acting
on an element; the total weight of an element; the weight of the active ground block
acting during earthquake
m – partial safety factor for the material (c for concrete, s for steel)
n – behavior factor
28
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Δel,I – maximum story drift in story i which is the horizontal story design drift
δ – friction angle between the back of a retaining wall and the ground
δid – real expected maximum displacement in ceiling level i, including the impact of
torsion
c; cu- maximum compression concrete strain in a shear wall; concrete strain for
compression
- spectrum correction factor for restrain factors other than 5% (section 202.4)
- diameter of plain rolled steel bar; internal friction angle in the ground
29
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
b - friction angle between the bottom of a retaining wall and the ground
- the angle obtained, by equation (87), for the retaining wall stability
- ratio of the minimum shear force and the maximum shear force; factor for the
eccentricity impact
105.1.3 Industrial and storage structures, except for "low structure" and those discussed in
IS 413, part 2, including all parts;
105.1.4 Stacks;
105.1.4 Silos2 (except for the subjects discussed in IS 413 part 2 including all parts).
105.2 Types of structures this standard does not apply to (the applicable
requirements are stricter)
105.2.1 Nuclear reactors;
105.2.3 Security facilities, chemical industry and other structures whose destruction might
endanger a wide population;
2
The calculation of silos will also include the response of their content to the structure oscillation,
with different filling levels (information that is available on professional literature).
30
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
105.2.4 Tanks and other engineering structures (to which the sub-parts of IS 413, part 2,
including all parts, apply)
105.2.5 Bridges3
105.3 Structure types, materials and construction methods that are not specified enough
in this standard, will be designed by the applicable requirements of the foreign
documents referenced in section 102.
106. Documentation
106.1 The planner's documents will specify the basic data for his seismic design, as follows:
106.2 If the calculation was done manually, in part or in whole, then all of the manual
calculations of the engineering relating to the seismic design will be saved as part of
his duty to keep the structure stability calculations. If the calculation was done using
a computer, then a plan personally signed by the planner will be added to the
planner's documents, including the following details:
- Drawing of the calculating model systems, used to present the problem in the
computer;
- Names of computer software and their revision, names of user manuals attached to
them and their revision (with any information necessary to determine the nature
and scope of the computer analysis, writing and inspection of data, and analysis and
interpretation of results).
106.3 The planner will keep, as part of his duty to keep the structure stability calculations,
these documents as well:
- Full printout of data, as submitted for computer running, including the signature of
the planner who made them, full name and submission date for running on a
computer.
- Final result output in the form of printout or CD.
3
The design of bridges will be done as specified in IS 1227 including all parts. The horizontal ground
acceleration will be determined as specified in section 202.1.
31
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
108.1 General
The instructions of this section apply to the design of additions to an existing
structure and to the design of an existing structure whose designation was changed
(importance factor and/or loads).
The design of changes in an existing structure without increasing its area and/or
designation will be done by the requirements of section 108.5.
(3A)
See in addition the planning and building regulations.
108.3.2 Design
32
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
108.3.2.2 Existing structure elements that are not part of the seismic
stiffening system
The capacity of structure elements to carry the gravity loads combined with
the stresses developing in them under the influence of the maximum
expected displacements according to section 403.2.4, while preventing
brittle fracture will be ensured.
108.3.2.4 The existing structure elements are part of the seismic stiffening
system
The existing structure elements will meet the stresses developing in them. In
the absence of reinforcement details that provide sufficient ductility to
prevent a brittle fracture, the capacity of these elements to resist the
stresses developed in them will be ensured, without taking into account a
force reduction factor (meaning K = 1.0).
108.5.1 General
A change can be made in an existing structure, as specified in section
108.5.2, without meeting the requirements of section 108.3, except for the
requirements relating to the structural model specified in section 108.3.2, if
it is proven by calculation, that the change does not reduce the seismic
resistance of the original structure.
33
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(3B)
Calculation of the original structure mass will be performed for the structure parts above
the entry level (meaning, excluding basements, underground parking spaces and shelters)
and will include the construction and cladding materials.
201. General
"Seismic activity" according to this standard is the forces and displacements exerted
(in horizontal and vertical direction) due to an earthquake.
The combination of the seismic activity with other loads will be as specified in the
relevant Israeli standards for combinations of loads.
These values will be determined by the location of the construction site and
the desired probability, out of the accelerations map (see appendix H) or the
list of settlements (see appendix C). For demonstration, the auxiliary tool as
specified on the website of the Standards Institution of Israel can be used
(for information only).
34
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The design will be based on the values that correspond with probability of 10% in 50 years
(repetition period (1) of about 475 years).
Class A building (as stipulated in table 4) shall be designed as the maximum determined in
accordance with (see formula 3 a-g):
Structures of importance group A (as specified in table 4) will be calculated by the stricter of
the following (see equation 3 (A-G):
Sa would be in accordance with 10% for a period of 50 years (return period of 1/475) – TG
the load is multiplied by the importance factor I.
Sa – based on a probability of 10% in 50 years (return period of 1/475 years).
Sa would be in accordance with 2% for a period of 50 years (return period of 1/2475) divided
by the importance factor I.
Sa – based on probability of 2% in 50 years (return period of 1/2475 years) divided by 1.4.
Structures of importance group B (as specified in table 4) will be calculated by the stricter of
the following:
35
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
4
Weighting of the parameters that characterize the soil at the top 30 meters will be done by the
(meaning Su, N or Vs) and . For example, the mean shear wave velocity at the top 30
36
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
As:
PI – plasticity index
C. Soil at the site will be classified as type F when one of the following
conditions is met:
1. Soil that may reach failure or collapse under a seismic load, like soil that
might undergo liquefaction and sensitive clays.
2. Organic clay and peat soil of thickness of more than 3-m.
3. Plastic clay, with plasticity index PI larger than 75 and thickness larger
than 8-m.
4. Very thick layers of soft clay or semi-stiff clay, with thickness of more
than 37-m and non-drained shear strength Su that is lower than 50 KPa.
D. When the section does not precisely meet the provisions of one of the soil
types in the table, the closest section out of the specified sections has to be
used.
37
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(1)
(2)
Where:
Type of soil Horizontal spectral acceleration on a rock (soil type B) for a short cycle time
at the site Ss (section 202.1.1)
Ss = 0.5 Ss = 0.5 Ss = 0.75 Ss = 1.0 Ss 1.25
A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
C 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0
D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0
E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9
F Section 202.2.3
Type of soil Horizontal spectral acceleration on a rock (soil type B) for a cycle time of one
at the site second S1 (section 202.1.1)
Ss = 0.1 Ss = 0.2 Ss = 0.3 Ss = 0.4 S1 0.5
A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
C 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3
D 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5
E 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.4
F Section 202.2.3
In the absence of sufficient data about the soil properties to a depth of 30-m as a
minimum, or an opinion of a licensed soil and foundation engineer, the site
coefficients Fv and Fa will be determined by soil type E, unless the soil at the site is
classified as F.
38
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
A specific site survey can be also conducted in cases where the soil is classified A
to E. In such case, the spectrum will be determined by the survey and not by the
tables, as long as it meets the limitations of appendix E about the reduction of
values.
(3G)
39
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The response spectrum values for restrain levels other than 5% will be obtained by
multiplying the value Sa by the correction coefficient , that is given in the equation:
(4)
The restrain level of the convective component in fluid tanks is 0.5% as specified in
IS 413 part 2.2, but for it = 1.5.
The restraint level to calculate the correction coefficient for structures higher than
50-m, with circumferential walls that are not masonry walls of thickness larger than
15-cm, will not be more than 3%.
(5)
Where:
Fa – is the site coefficient for short cycle times as specified in table 2 (by the value of
Ss).
40
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
41
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Story structures may not be built with a soft story when the ratio of rigidities
(definition 103.26) is less than 0.65 of the story above it, or 0.7 of the mean of the
three stories above it, or with a weak story (definition 103.27), unless the structure
is a double-story and its height above the foundation surface is less than 9-m.
The design of structures with irregularities for which there are no instructions in this
standard will be performed as instructed in the latest professional literature.
42
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
If the total contribution of elements that are not part of the system that is designed
to carry seismic load (like masonry walls or precast concrete screen walls) to the
horizontal rigidity of the structure is more than 15% of its rigidity without these
elements, then their contribution to the structure rigidity has to be taken into
account in the calculation of its cycle times only.
In equivalent static analysis, the basic cycle time T can be determined based on tests
or measurements using approximate methods, but it will not be longer than that
obtained from these equations:
(6A)
(6B)
In other structures:
(6C)
Where:
H - the total height of the structure above the top level of the foundation or a rigid
basement ceiling (5A) (m)
In equivalent static analysis, if the cycle time T was calculated by dynamic analysis,
then the cycle time for the calculation will not be larger than that obtained from
equations (6A), (6B) (6C), multiplied by a coefficient that equals:
(6D)
As a substitute for analysis to evaluate T, the values of equations (6A), (6B) and (6C)
can be used.
43
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Note:
The rigidity of masonry walls will be calculated by Israeli standard IS 2413 in the
section discussing masonry walls (4.4.1), or according to other latest professional
literature.
In regular structures, the calculation can be carried out in two main directions
only: the direction of the axis of symmetry (or the approximate axis of
symmetry) and the perpendicular direction.
B. The results of the two calculations will be integrated as specified in the various
sections of this section (see also section 303.2).
(7)
A.
B.
44
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Where:
Sa – spectral response acceleration coefficient from the design response spectrum
specified in section 202.3
I – structure importance coefficient by table 4
K- force reduction coefficient due to seismic activity as per section 204.4.
Z – expected horizontal ground acceleration coefficient
S1 – according to section 202.1.1.
If the value of Cd that is calculated by the limitations A, B, and C above, is larger than
, then the drift calculations will be performed based on the forces obtained from
the calculation as per section 302 or 303 and not directly from the values of Sa in the
spectrum.
Table 4 – Importance factors I of structures (until defined otherwise in the planning and
building regulations)
5
The values of importance coefficients for tanks and other structures containing explosive or toxic
materials, or for tanks having a potential of causing considerable damage to the environment,
whether independent or part of a structure, will be at least those that are specified in IS 413, part 2.2.
45
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Force reduction coefficient values K for steel structures are specified in IS 1225 part
4.
Force reduction coefficient values K for unique structures are specified in table 7.
Table 5 – maximum values (A) of the force reduction coefficient K for a reinforced concrete
structure
Table 6 – force reduction coefficient values K for a steel structure – the table was omitted.
Table 7 – force reduction coefficient values K for a unique structure (with no material
limitation)
The structure K
Stacks and silos made of cast in situ reinforced concrete whose 3.5
walls go down up to the level of foundations, cooling towers,
signs, racks in warehouses
Stacks and silos (not mentioned above), vertical production 2.8
facilities, hopper tanks, antenna towers (cantilever or bound) and
other independent structure (self-supporting)
Cantilever structures with concentrated mass at the top, 2.0
amusement facilities memorials
Unique structures discussed in the sub-sections of Israeli standard As specified in the
IS 413 part 2 – engineering structures reduction coefficient
tables of the series
parts
46
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
204.5 Limitations on the use of the various ductility levels and reduction
coefficient
A low ductility level is permitted only for "low" structures and structures of
importance group C in an area where Z ≤ 0.20, for structures of importance group B
in an area where Z ≤ 0.10, and for structures of importance group A in an area where
Z ≤ 0.075.
Structures of importance group A, that are erected in an area where Z 0.10, will be
designed with a reduction coefficient that fits a medium ductility level only (even if
the details of their elements are designed for a high ductility level).
In the calculation of the story shear strength, the frame components will be taken
into account (like, concrete or steel columns, reinforced concrete walls, braced
shear walls, vertical trusses made of concrete or steel) that resist the story shear
force in the inspected direction, and masonry walls of 150-cm thick or more, that are
parallel to that direction, whether built between concrete columns or between
concrete walls on both ends – less the length of openings in them. The total story
strength for shear in the inspected direction will be calculated by equations (7) and
(8) as follows:
(7B)
(8B)
Where:
47
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
0.2 MPa – in masonry walls where the mortar strength at joints is 10 MPa as
a minimum
0.1 MPa – in masonry walls where the mortar strength at joints is weaker.
(9)
Where:
When one of the above conditions is not met – the rigidity of these walls will be
taken into account when determining the location of the story's center of rigidity.
For this purpose, walls made of hollow blocks or silicate squares will be considered
as having a Young's modulus of 2000 MPa, and Ytung block walls will be considered
to have Young's modulus of 1200 MPa.
48
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
301. General
301.2 Loads
The calculation of seismic impacts takes into account all weights Wi that exist in the
structure during a seismic event, as a cause and source of inertial forces in an
earthquake, by their location in the building, according to the following equations
(10) and (11):
(10)
(11)
Where:
Wi – total weight of story i (in force units)
Gi – characteristic dead load in story i
Qi – characteristic live load, distributed over a surface, in story i
Qi – structure area that is subjected to live load in story i
kq – frequency factor for live load (table 8)
M – seismic participating mass in the oscillation mode, by the location in the
structure
G – gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/sec2)
The impact of Wi (times the partial safety factor for a load of f = 1.0) will be always
integrated in the calculation of the earthquake impact.
49
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
A. 100% of the design forces due to an earthquake in direction X with 30% of the
design force due to an earthquake in direction Y with 30% of the design forces due
to an earthquake in direction Z;
50
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
B. 30% of the design forces due to an earthquake in direction X with 100% of the
design force due to an earthquake in direction Y with 30% of the design forces due
to an earthquake in direction Z;
C. 30% of the design forces due to an earthquake in direction X with 30% of the design
force due to an earthquake in direction Y with 100% of the design forces due to an
earthquake in direction Z;
When directions X and Y are horizontal and perpendicular to each other and direction Z
is the vertical axis.
The earthquake in direction Z will be considered only in the cases specified as per
section 204.1.2.
(12)
Where:
Note:
Design shear forces for the top ductility levels will also include the dynamic
amplification factor, as specified in section 404.2.2.
(13)
Where:
In a structure with a basic period shorter than that and in a structure that is
calculated by modal analysis, no such concentrated load will act. When calculating
the structure stability to resist turning over, the impact of FT may be neglected.
51
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The rate of horizontal load in each story i in the direction in question will be
calculated by the following equation (14):
(14)
Where:
Fi – equivalent horizontal design load for a seismic force in story i under the impact
of an earthquake
FH – total horizontal design load under the impact of an earthquake (section 302.1)
FT – concentrated horizontal design load at the structure head under the impact of
an earthquake (Section 302.2)
The load Fi acting on the top ceiling level will be attached to the load FT acting there.
(15)
(16)
(17)
Where:
52
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
PGA – peak expected horizontal acceleration on the surface (in units of gravitational
acceleration, g)
All elements that carry vertical load which are not part of the load bearing system
that resists the horizontal load in that direction are also inspected, with respect to
their capability to continue to carry vertical loads, as their horizontal displacement in
each story, according to their location in the structure (section 403.2.3), is K times
larger than the displacement calculated by the elastic method, by the above design
forces.
(18)
d – distance between the center of masses and the rigidity center perpendicularly to
the seismic activity direction (figure 4)
53
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
If in the calculation of the dangerous stress under the impact of torsion (e and d) it is
(19)
In this equation:
δmin – minimum calculated displacement in the level of ceiling i, including the impact
of torsion using equation (18) without factor AT, calculated simultaneously with
δmax;
In structures that are symmetrical with respect to masses and rigidities, around an
axis parallel to the seismic activity direction (when the structure can be calculated
using two separate planar models as per section 303.2), the impact of the torsion
moment distributed along the structure height can be calculated as follows, which is
a simpler method than the calculation by equation (19):
The impact of seismic forces on the stiffening elements, that is calculated with no
torsion impact (translation only), will be increased by multiplying by factor that is
calculated by equation (20) below:
(20)
Where:
- increase factor
As long as the result, in absolute value, is not less than the one obtained by
calculation with torsion by equation (18), with no increase. But if it is found that
when using equation (20) we obtain that , then the calculation will be
done by equation (19) in the symmetrical structure as well.
54
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Stiffening
element
Oscillation
direction
(21)
Where:
K – force reduction factor for a structure (table 5 or table 7 or as per IS 1225 part 4)
When the condition is met, 2nd order impacts are taken into account
using one of the acceptable calculation methods.
The story stability factor I will not be larger than 0.2 in any story.
55
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
- The mean rigidity in the stories of the wide and rigid structure part, is 10 times or
more larger than the mean rigidity in the soft tower stories.
- The basic period of the soft tower itself, that is fixed in the level of connection to the
wide rigid structure, is longer than the basic period of the structure with its two
parts, times 0.9.
- A soft tower is designed as a separate structure fixed to the wide rigid structure in
the level of connection between them, and K that fits the properties of the soft
tower and its structure is selected;
- A wide rigid structure is designed as a separate structure and a second K is selected,
that is fit for the properties and structure. Seismic loads that come from the soft
tower will be increased by the ratio of the two K values, and will act in the level of
connection between the two structure parts (in addition to the forces due to the
wide rigid structure weight that act in the level of the inspected connection).
When the condition of non-coupling is not met, the analytic model will take into
account spatial motions (3-dimensional) of the structure.
The structure and its elements will be designed to resist the forces and
displacements that meet the following stress combinations:
A. 100% of the design forces due to an earthquake in direction X with 30% of the
design force due to an earthquake in direction Y and 30% of the design forces due to
an earthquake in direction Z;
B. 30% of the design forces due to an earthquake in direction X with 100% of the
design force due to an earthquake in direction Y and 30% of the design forces due to
an earthquake in direction Z;
C. 30% of the design forces due to an earthquake in direction X with 30% of the design
force due to an earthquake in direction Y and 100% of the design forces due to an
earthquake in direction Z;
When directions X and Y are perpendicular and horizontal and direction Z is the vertical
axis.
56
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Taking into account the earthquake in direction Z will be done only in the cases required
according to section 204.1.2.
A. In planar models:
In each of the two perpendicular directions, all oscillation modes whose periods are
longer than 0.4 seconds will be taken into account. If their number if less than 3, at least
3 oscillation modes whose periods are longer will be taken into account (including
periods shorter than 0.4 seconds).
B. In non-planar models
In each seismic activity direction, all oscillation modes whose periods are longer than 0.4
seconds will be taken into account. If their number is less than 4, at least four oscillation
modes will be taken into account (including periods shorter than 0.4 seconds), as two of
them are basically rotational.
C. When the sum of participation factors (see note above) in the oscillation modes in
paragraphs A or B is smaller than 90%, then oscillation modes are added to
supplement to 90% as a minimum in each direction.
Note:
(22)
(23)
This design load is divided into horizontal forces Fim in the level of each ceiling i in
each of the oscillation modes included in the model – according to the displacement
of the said ceiling in that oscillation mode and the rate of active modal weight Wim in
that story under that oscillation mode, that are calculated by equations (24) and (25)
below:
(24)
57
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(25)
Cdm – horizontal modal seismic design factor for mth oscillation mode as per
equation (7) with the restrictions of section 204.2.
For additional information about the calculation model inspection for the planned
structure see appendix F.
The modal values are calculated by the square root sum method (SRSS).
The corresponding design values are obtained by the following equation (28)
(28)
Where:
Q – combined response value of one type (for displacement, axial force, moment,
shear force etc.)
All oscillation modes that need to be taken into account will be those whose
participation factor is larger in the relevant direction, as long as the provisions of
section 303.3 C are complied with.
For periods that are very close in length (difference of less than 10%), a combined
value by the CQC (Combination Quadratic Complete) equation is calculated.
58
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(29)
(30)
Where:
When the condition is met, 2nd order impacts are taken into account
using one of the acceptable calculation methods.
The story stability factor I will not be larger than 0.2 in any story.
It should be emphasized, that in this calculation method, maximum values for forces
and moments at various locations on the structure appear at different time points in
the said earthquake, as well as in other earthquakes – which makes it difficult to
determine the correct design values. Therefore the use of this method will be
considered complementary calculation in addition to the calculation by the modal
analysis method and will not substitute it.
59
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
305.1 Diaphragms
Ceilings and floors will act as diaphragms, to collect the forces in their area and
transfer them to seismic stiffening elements, or transfer these forces from them.
Their action will be mainly in the elastic area – used as solid surfaces or as trusses.
The connections of ceilings to the stiffening elements will resist the transferred
maximum forces (horizontal and vertical). Displacements in the diaphragm plane will
be coordinated and limited to the possible distortions of load bearing elements
attached to them, such that these elements will not lose their capability to serve as
supports for vertical and horizontal forces (see specification in section 108.3.2.2).
In structures where the ceilings are made of precast elements, joint action of all
elements as a horizontal diaphragm will be ensured. The diaphragm will resist the
shear forces and moments in the horizontal plane, that are caused by its action as a
rigid diaphragm that transfers the seismic forces to the stiffening elements. The
diaphragm will also transfer the seismic forces that are caused due to differences in
the rigidity of the stiffening elements. For this purpose, the precast elements will be
connected using suitable measures and suitable strength (like, toothing, welding,
reinforcement overlaps, supplementary concrete casting at the site).
Elements and the connection areas between them will have the correct strength, to
allow the two sub-systems act by the applicable requirements.
60
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
A beam cast on a wall or partition wall after construction, which is part of the ceiling,
can serve as a horizontal belt.
61
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
- Low ductility level6 - this ductility level is fit for structures that are designed as
specified in the concrete code, in Israeli standard IS 466, including all parts – plus the
requirements defined below;
- Medium ductility level – in this ductility level, special design requirements shall
apply, such that the system will be able to function within the elastic-plastic
response range for cyclic load or alternating load with no brittle fracture
phenomenon;
- High ductility level – in this ductility level, the design will be performed using special
methods that will allow the development of a defined number of stability systems.
The design using these methods will be done with further specification of the
sections. The systems will include plastic hinges and will be related to high capability
to absorb energy. In this ductility level it is taken into account that displacements
and distortions may remain in the structure after a strong earthquake. The design
requirements for this level are specified in this chapter and in chapters F and G.
The medium and high ductility levels together will be also called the top ductility levels.
402.1 Concrete
Regular concrete types will meet the requirements of table 10, as a minimum.
Concrete type
For load bearing elements For other elements
B-30 as a minimum B-20 as a minimum
Plain steel bars will not be used for reinforcement of load bearing structure parts in
the top ductility levels.
The anchoring and reinforcement overlaps on load bearing elements that participate
in the load bearing system that resists the seismic load, will be calculated in each
case by low adhesion conditions, as defined in IS 466 including all of its parts,
without reducing the value of (reduction of the anchorage length due to the
existence of a bend or hook), longitudinal rebars on beams will end with a standard
hook, as a minimum.
6
This level is selected considering the limitations specified in section 204.5.
62
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Table 11 – seismic design requirements for moment resisting spatial frames for the various
ductility levels
▪ When the basic period T is shorter than 0.7 seconds, the drift will be
calculated by equation (31) below:
(31)
(32)
Where:
63
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
When brittle elements are connected to the structure, it has to be decided if the
requirements should be stricter.
(33)
Where:
(34)
Where:
- maximum expected real drift in the level of ceiling i, including the torsion
impact
403.2.5.1 General
The structures will be built as a minimum, at a distance from the end of the
property or from an adjacent structure, to allow free oscillation of each
structure without causing damage to an adjacent structure during an
earthquake, (nor on an existing structure, neither on a built structure or a
structure that will be built in the future). This requirement also applies to
blocks of the same structure, divided by vertical joints.
The joint space, by the spacing required below, will be kept clean from any
filling or construction waste and dirt throughout the structure existence
period. This space will be also maintained between the ends of finish and
cladding materials of the walls of the two adjacent structures. The insulation
of joints against wind and rain will be connected only to one of the two
64
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
adjacent structures, and will be able to move over the other structure in
case of an earthquake.
(35)
- An approximate value of the spacing can be determined only if the two structures
are regular and are not the structures specified in section 403.2.4.3. The
approximate spacing (mm) depends on the basic period of the structures and
factor Z according to equation (36) below:
(36)
Where:
- the longer basic period out of the periods of the two structures
(seconds)
Moreover:
A. will not be less than the value of as H in this section is the height of
structure from the foundation head up to the highest level that may interact with an
adjacent structure.
B. In any case, 0 will not be lower than the following values:
The dimensions will remain constant by the larger value of the values obtained
from equation (36) or by section A above, at the top half of the structure – and
dimension may be linearly decreased to dimension 0 that is given in section B
above, starting from the half structure height up to the bottom of the joint.
65
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
o When the levels of ceilings in the two structures are at a different level on
both sides of the joint.
o When the structures are very different in masses or in basic periods, by
more than 50% of the low value;
o When the structures have a different number of floors (a difference of more
than two stories).
(37)
Where:
66
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(38)
(39)
The requirements of this section do not apply to tie beams in braced shear walls and
on high beams.
(40) mm
(41)
(42)
Column
Column
Beam
Beams
Legend:
e - eccentricity of the beam in relation to the column
bc – column width
bw – wall web width
hc – dimension in a horizontal section in a column, perpendicular to dimension bc
hb – beam section height
l- beam length up to the intersection center
Figure 5 – maximum eccentricity of a beam (horizontal sections)
67
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The shear design forces will be in any case larger than the forces obtained from the load
analysis. Their size is determined by the maximum shear obtained when the two extreme
sections of the spam exhaust their full bending capacity in opposite directions, according to
the actually prevailing concrete sections and reinforcement sections.
When calculating the capability of sections as explained above, the impacts of the axial and
perpendicular load will be also included, as specified in table 12. Therefore, on each field
end, there will be two design shear force values:
- Maximum value Vmax, that corresponds with a negative capacity moment at the
relevant edge (and positive on the opposite edge) and maximum vertical load on the
beam;
- Minimum value Vmin, that corresponds with a positive capacity moment at the
relevant edge (and negative on the opposite edge), and minimum vertical load on
the beam.
The ratio between these two values (at the edge in question of the field) will be calculated
by the following equation (43):
(43)
When the value of is less than (-1.0), = (-1.0) will be taken into account.
The design of the shear resistance of beams at the left end of a field is specified in
table 12. The right end will be designed by adequate substitution of the stress
states.
Table 12 – design shear force for beams with medium ductility level
Table legend:
q1 – maximum vertical load on the beam
q2 – minimal vertical load on the beam
M1; M2 – capacity moments at the two edges of the beamspan (with a top symbol to state
their trend)
l – beam length up to the center of intersection
- the ratio of the minimal shear force to the maximal shear force
68
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(44)
Where:
In a section where the moment sign changes under different loading states,
condition (44) shall apply both to the top reinforcement and to the bottom
reinforcement.
Table 13 – limits of longitudinal reinforcement ratio in beams for different steel types
For the top ductility levels, the following limitations shall also apply:
A. Along a beam, on each section perpendicular to its axis, there will be top and
bottom rebars. On each face there will be at least two ribbed steel bars of 14-mm in
diameter.
B. On all sensitive beam areas (section 403.3.1.6), the following condition (45) will be
met:
(45)
Where:
69
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
C. In the design of the top and bottom reinforcement, in all other beam areas, the
reinforcement section area will not be less than 1/4 of the maximum reinforcement
section area that is required in any section in that field (top or bottom).
D. The reinforcement section area used to calculate the capacity at the field end in L or
T beams, cast with a ceiling as a single unit, is the sum of section areas of all
longitudinal bars that are found within the dotted area in figure 6. At least 75% of
this reinforcement will be anchored to the column grain, or will pass through it into
an adjacent field further away on the beam.
E. The anchoring lengths of bars anchored at a junction or within a sensitive area on a
beam, will be increased at least by 50% as against the requirements for poor
adhesion conditions in IS 466, including all parts.
F. The maximum diameter of rebars anchored within the area of a beam-column
intersection will be limited by the following equations:
Where:
Ag – full section area of the concrete in a column
Hc - column dimension in the length direction of the bar in question
fcd – design compressive force in concrete
fctm – mean tensile strength of the concrete in a frame
fsd – design strength of reinforcement steel
Nd,min – minimum axial design force
- diameter of rebar made of ribbed steel
70
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Column Column
(A)
(B)
Column Column
(D) (C)
Figure 6 – concrete areas where the longitudinal reinforcement of a beam will be located
For medium ductility levels, the stirrups will also meet the requirements
further below in this section and in section 403.3.1.7.
For high ductility level, the stirrups will also meet the requirements of
chapter G.
In sensitive beam areas of medium ductility level, the stirrup section areas
and their distances will meet the requirements of table 14.
o On each field end, up to the following distance from the column edge;
▪ For low ductility level: 1.0 hb
▪ For medium ductility level 1.5 hb
▪ For high ductility level 2.0 hb
71
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Table 14 – minimum requirements for stirrups in beams with low and medium ductility
level
Figure legend:
When the stirrups perpendicular to the element axis has n branches, the
section area of one branch Ash will be calculated by equation (46) below:
(46)
72
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
the shear reinforcement will be designed by IS 466 including all parts, according to
the truss model.
- When , the shear reinforcement will be designed by IS 466
including all parts, by the truss model, only if the following condition (47) is met:
(47)
Half of the shear will be accepted by stirrups and half on inclined reinforcement, if
the following condition (48) is met:
(48)
Even if condition (48) is not met, the entire shear will be accepted by two-way
inclined reinforcement, such that on each beam section (including the connection to
the column), inclined reinforcement will be found in each diagonal direction, whose
section area will be calculated by the following equation (49):
(49)
In addition, the element will contain in any case stirrups as required in section
403.3.1.6.
73
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(50)
Columns which are part of load bearing frames that resist seismic load7 will
meet the following limitations and requirements:
A. In frames where there are 4 columns or more – plastic hinges are permitted
on one quarter of the number of columns in each frame, at the maximum, as
long as all other columns remain in the elastic region.
B. In structures of one or two stories, or at the top story of a multi-story
structure, the number of columns with plastic hinges will be limited to half
of the number of columns, as long as the structure stability is maintained.
C. The design of columns for stresses combined with bending, axial force and
shear will prevent optional development of failure (unlike the appearance of
a plastic hinge).
D. When the structure is calculated by equivalent static analysis, the calculated
moments on the columns are multiplied by coefficient according to
equations (51) and (53) below:
7
For requirements for columns which are not part of these frames – see section 604.4.
74
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Requirements
Section width
On the four top stories: 200 bc mm
On lower stories: 250 bc mm
On all stories: 300 bc mm
l25 bc
Legend:
l – column length
bc – column width
hc – dimension of a horizontal section of a column perpendicular to bc and larger than it.
Where:
In structures with low ductility level, columns will be designed for shear as
per IS 466 including all parts.
In structures of the top ductility levels, columns will be designed for shear as
follows:
75
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
o When the columns are compressed, the part of the concrete in resisting the
shear will be calculated in the inspected direction, Vcd, as per equation (55)
below:
(55)
Where:
o The remaining shear force will be accepted by stirrups and diagonal shear
reinforcement, as specified in section 403.3.1.7. The bars of stirrups on
columns will end with hooks at an angle of 135 as a minimum.
The transverse reinforcement ratio at the top ductility levels will not be less
than calculated by the equation:
(56)
Where:
76
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
o For medium ductility level in a section of lc long, above and beneath a beam
at an intersection, as per figure 9, which meets the following condition
(57B):
Where:
o Stirrups along the column with high ductility level, will meet the
requirements of chapter G.
Stirrups along the entire column length with medium ductility level and in a
sensitive area on this column with low ductility level will be designed by the
requirements of table 16.
In non-sensitive column areas with low ductility level, the stirrups will meet
the specification of section 403.3.2.3.
- Stirrups in a column section, in a sensitive area with medium ductility level, will be
arranged as described in figure 10, taking into account the cover thickness of the
external stirrups, as specified in IS 466 including all parts.
- The column stirrups will be also assembled within the intersection area (along the
entire beam height).
- For low and medium ductility levels, a second longitudinal bar as a minimum will be
found at a stirrup corner.
- Overlap of longitudinal reinforcement on a column which is an element of a load
bearing frame that resist seismic load, will not be found within a sensitive area
where a plastic hinge can be formed.
77
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Beam
Figure legend:
sh – distance between adjacent stirrups
lc – length of sensitive area in a column
ln – column length
L – diameter of longitudinal rebar
hc – dimension of a horizontal section in a column, perpendicular to bc
bc – column width
h'c – distance between axes of longitudinal rebars
Note: for the beam reinforcement and stirrups see figure 7.
78
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Table 16 – requirements for stirrups in various areas in a column with low ductility level
and medium ductility level
Specification of requirements
Minimum diameter of stirrup 8 h mm
But not less than
Spacing between stirrups in a sensitive area
For low ductility level sh = min [9L; bc/2; 200mm]
For medium ductility level sh = min [7L; bc/3; 150mm]
In a non-sensitive area for medium ductility level
sh = min [12L; bc; 250mm]
Table legend:
h – stirrup bar diameter
L – diameter of longitudinal rebar
bc – column width
sh – spacing between adjacent stirrups along the column
fsd,h – design tensile strength of the stirrup steel
or in the steel of horizontal bars (tie stirrups)
fsd,l – design tensile strength for longitudinal reinforcement steel
B A
Close
stirrup Tie stirrups Close Close
Tie stirrup stirrup stirrup
Figure 10 – layout of stirrups in a sensitive area of a column with medium ductility level
(Dimensions in mm)
79
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(Dimensions in mm)
Where:
Muc – capacity bending moment (in the direction described in figure 12) of a
column, beneath and above the intersection
Mur – capacity bending moment (in the direction described in figure 12) of a
beam, to the right of an intersection
80
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Mul – the capacity bending moment (in the direction described in figure 12)
of a beam, to the left of an intersection
B A
For all ductility levels, there will be no reinforcement overlap within the
intersection. For the top ductility levels, there will be no reinforcement
overlap in the sensitive areas of the columns and in beams close to the
intersection.
The column stirrups will be also installed inside the intersection, with the
density and dimeter as necessary in sensitive areas according to table 16,
unless the calculation requires more than that.
81
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
- The effective width bj at an intersection (figure 13) for the shear calculation
will meet one of the following conditions (60) or (61):
(60) as bc bw
(61) as bc < bw
Where:
(62)
The maximum design force Vjh to calculate the areas of all reinforcement
sections for horizontal shear at an intersection will be limited by the
following condition (63):
(63)
82
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
A. If the vertical compressive force above the intersection is less than 0.1 Ag Fcd
(or is a tensile force), there will be no reduction;
B. If the vertical compressive force above the intersection is larger in absolute
value than 0.1 Ag Fcd, but is not larger than 0.5 Ag Fcd, the reduction will be at
the rate of Vch by equation (64) below:
(64)
C. The maximum vertical compressive force above the intersection will not be
higher than 0.5 Ag Fcd.
The design force for vertical shear at intersection Vjv will be calculated by
equation (65) below:
(65)
This force will be reduced by the rate of the concrete part Vcv that
participates in carrying the vertical shear force, as follows:
A. When a compressive axial force is exerted on the column and the column
reinforcement is symmetrical, Vjv will be reduced at a rate of Vcv by equations (66)
and (67) below:
(66)
(67)
B. When compressive axial force is exerted on a column and the column reinforcement
is not symmetrical, Vcv will be calculated by equations (66), (68):
(68)
C. When an axial tensile force that is less than 0.3 Ag Fcd is exerted on a column, Vcv will
be calculated by equations (66), (69):
(69)
Where:
83
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
D. In any other case, the vertical shear force will not be reduced at the intersection.
Table 17 – seismic design requirements for shear walls with the different ductility levels
84
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The design loads for walls and their combinations will be determined as specified in
sections 302, 303.
Whether or not redistribution was done, the walls' moment envelope will be
increased as follows (figure 14):
- A straight line (cord) is drawn between the maximum moment at the wall base (A)
based on Md and between the zero moment at the head:
- The line of increased moments is passed parallel to a cord at a distance lw in the
vertical direction from (A).
- The concrete sections and reinforcement are designed by the moment obtained
from the displaced chord.
Note: if the bending capacity, Mu, at the base of a given wall that is designed to
develop a plastic hinge, is 25% larger than the design moment acting on it, Md, then
it has to be ensured that other plastic hinges will not develop along the height in
sections that are not designed for that. Alternatively, repeated design with a new
force reduction coefficient could be carried out, that is valid only for the said wall
Increased moment
envelope
Cord
Calculation envelope
85
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(70)
(71)
As:
n – number of stories
The shear force acting on a shear wall is multiplied, for the top ductility
levels, by a dynamic amplification factor eq by the equation:
(72)
Where:
Mu – capacity bending moment for the wall base section by the actually
existing compressive force and reinforcement (according to chapter 5 of IS
466 part 1)
Sa(T) – spectral design acceleration coefficient for the basic cycle time of the
structure
Note:
86
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
When the walls in the load directions are not identical, then the more
flexible walls (for bending) tend – after yield of the other walls – to carry
larger shear forces than expected by their rigidity or relative strength.
- The design shear force in a shear wall will be limited by the following
condition (73)8:
(73)
- The design shear force in the wall will be reduced by the rate of the concrete
part that resists the shear, as follows:
o In the wall part where the appearance of a plastic hinge is expected,
and the total minimal compressive force in it is larger than 0.1 AgFcd,
the design shear force will be reduced by Vcd as specified in equation
(55).
o In the wall part where the appearance of a plastic hinge is not
expected, and the total minimum compressive force in it is larger
than 0.1 AgFcd, the design shear force on it will be reduced by Vcw, by
the following equation (74):
(74)
- When the compressive force is smaller than that, the design shear force will
be reduced by Vcw by equation (75) below:
(75)
(76)
Where:
1 – coefficient
8
For the purpose of this section , as the value of d1 is as specified in table D-1 in appendix
D. In the sensitive area for the high sensitivity level, will be used.
87
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
- Throughout the country and for any ductility level, the shear wall will be at
least 150-mm thick, except for the following requirement:
- For a low ductility level in an area where Z 0.10 , the wall thickness will be
120-mm as a minimum;
- Regular openings in a wall are preferable to obtain braced shear walls.
- For a high ductility level, the requirements of section 802 in chapter H will
be added.
88
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
- In a shear wall, there will be at least two orthogonal steel wires, one for
each wall face. The diameter of bars in grids will not be more than 1/10 of
the wall thickness;
- The spacing between vertical bars will not be more than 200-mm
- The vertical distributed reinforcement ratio will meet the following
condition (77):
(77)
Where:
b - wall thickness
- On a vertical edge of a shear wall, the horizontal rebar edges will surround
the wall edge in the shape of double hook (two bending of 90).
Alternatively, an open horizontal stirrup will be added at the wall edge (C
shaped rebar, with full overlap with the horizontal bars on grids);
- The vertical reinforcement section area, concentrated at the wall edge or at
the intersection with a flange or with a perpendicular wall, will meet the
following conditions:
1. Will not be smaller than required to accept the tensile forces accepted
in the calculation according to IS 466 including all parts;
2. Will not be less than 0.001 of the effective concrete section area in the
wall (horizontal section).
- When the compressive stress on the wall edge is more than 0.4 fcd (as
specified in figure 22), the wall (or flange) have to be thickened at the top
ductility levels (section 404.2.4.3);
- Vertical reinforcement overlap will be prevented in an area where the steel
is expected to yield. There will be no overlap of more than one third of the
rebars in a single section. Between consecutive overlaps, there will be a
89
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
vertical distance with no overlap that is at least twice as long as the overlap
length;
- On a horizontal joint in shear walls, the following condition (78) will be met:
(78)
(79)
Where:
b – wall width
- In the vertical direction, from the wall base up to the place where a plastic
hinge can be formed, and no less than the following condition (80) (figure
16):
(80)
Where:
90
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
- In the horizontal direction, the wall area, where the concrete compressive
strain in it is more than 0.0015, the strain will be calculated as linear strain,
by the worst load combination, including seismic load (figure 16).
The strain calculation will be done for the horizontal section of the wall,
including thickening and flanges up to a distance lw/2 on each side of the
wall (figure 16). The maximum strain at the wall edge will not be more than
0.0035. The thickening details on the wall edge will be as specified in section
802.
(81)
Where:
(82)
91
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Sensitive
area
The length of the sensitive area will, not be less than 15% of the wall length (lw) and
will be thicker than it, multiplied by a factor of 1.5. The wall thickness in the
sensitive area will not be less than 200-mm and no less than the story height divided
by 15.
Table 18 – horizontal reinforcement ratio in a sensitive area of a ductile shear wall with
medium ductility level
92
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
When one of the following conditions is met on the beams, the bending and
shear in them will be accepted by diagonal reinforcement in the two
directions:
(83)
(84)
b – wall thickness
93
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
602. Foundations
When it cannot be determined that the soil and water conditions at the site do not
prevent full or partial liquefaction of the ground, adequate tests will be carried out,
including the soil surface sliding (as specified in section 202.1.4), if they are sloped.
If it is found that there is a liquefaction risk, then the impact on the structure
stability and foundation will be inspected by the soil consultant.
If stability is not proven, then the erection of the structure at the site will be
prevented. The consultant's opinion will be attached to the documents submitted to
the local authority as part of the compliance with the requirements for accepting a
building permit.
94
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The foundations system will allow transfer of the seismic load and the creation of
energy absorption conditions at the top structure, without affecting the capability of
foundations to carry the full vertical forces.
Shallow foundations (separate foundations or rafts) will be designed such that soil
strains will remain limited, with no significant residual strain.
602.2.1 Beams
The section dimensions of beams will not be less than 200-mm, and the
section area will not be less than 800 cm2.
602.2.2 Floors
The thickness of a tie floor will not be less than 150-mm. In order to
calculate the compressive capacity, an effective width that equals 12 times
the floor thickness can be considered, but no more than half of the distance
between adjacent columns.
- In an area where Z 0.1, when the small dimension of the column section
between the tie member and the foundation is at least 300-mm
- In an area where Z 0.15, when the small dimension of the column section
between the tie member and the foundation is at least 400-mm for a
shallow foundation, and as the dimension of the pile in a deep foundation;
If the column dimensions are smaller than specified above, then the tie
member will be attached to the foundation.
If the small dimensions of the column equals at least 15 times the value
above, and the shear stress in concrete is less than fvd, then the above
vertical distances can be increased by 500-mm.
95
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The rebars necessary to accept the calculated forces will be anchored for
their full capacity to external columns, as specified in IS 466, including all
parts. When a tie beam is connected at the end only to a perpendicular
beam, this beam will be calculated to carry the horizontal moments caused
by the above axial force on the tie beam perpendicular to it. The minimum
stirrup reinforcement in foundation columns (between the foundation head
and the top face of the tie beam) will be .
In structures found close to slopes or bluffs, the stability of bluffs or slopes will be
also checked for earthquake conditions.
96
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(a) System of forces acting on the active ground block behind a wall
Legend:
97
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(85)
(86)
Neglecting Kv:
(87)
Where:
b – friction angle between the bottom of the wall and the ground
δ - friction angle between the back of the retaining wall and the ground
- inclination of the back of the retaining wall behind the retaining wall, toward the
horizon
i – slope of the ground surface behind the retaining wall, toward the horizon
9
Retaining walls made of reinforced soil will be designed as specified in IS 1630.
98
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(88)
Where:
PGA – horizontal expected ground acceleration factor (in relation to the gravitational
acceleration g)
When the wall supports ground in which an adjacent building is founded, and there
is mutual impact between the building foundations and the retaining wall, the
displacement d will be limited to maximum 2-cm.
When part of the ground behind the wall is saturated and found beneath the
groundwater level, only the dynamic force exerted on the ground is obtained from
the above equations (in the saturated area), when substituting the submerged
spatial weight of the ground sub.
To this force, the dynamic force caused by pore water pressure, that is calculated by
the following equation (89), has to be added;
(89)
(90)
Where:
b – friction angle between the bottom of the retaining wall and the ground
99
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(91)
(92)
Where:
Hp – part of the height of retaining wall, that is subjected to passive force (see also
figure 18), and is found below the ground surface, on the exposed side of the wall.
(93)
Where:
100
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
specified dynamic analysis for such an element, the amplification factor 2RP
will be according to table 19, as long as it is not larger than 2.0.
Connection fittings will have sufficient ductility and rotatability and will prevent
fracture or extraction of the connection itself, of the anchoring of parts in the said
element or to the building frame, or damage to fittings surrounding the connection
fitting.
The connection fitting and its anchoring will be designed to a load that is 4/3 larger
than the load calculated by sections 604.1, 604.2. Screws, pins, welding connections
etc. in the connection fittings will be designed for a load that is 4 times larger than
the load calculated by sections 604.1, 604.2.
604.4 Design of frame elements that are not part of the load bearing frame
system that resists a seismic load
These elements will be inspected in the calculation to maintain their capacity to
carry the calculated axial forces in service state, when drifted in each story by the
maximum expected displacement according to section 403.2.4 – when they maintain
elastic continuity relations on intersections, considering 2nd order impacts, but with
a partial safety coefficient for load of f = 1.0.
101
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
no damage due to the formation of plastic hinges on sections that fail to meet the
calculation test.
700. General instructions for seismic design of frames with high ductility
level
The design of frames for high ductility level will be done by the requirements of the
sections specified in table 20.
Table 20 – seismic design requirements for frames with high ductility level
Design shear forces will be in any case larger than the forces obtained from the load
analysis. Their size is determined by the maximum shear obtained when the two
extreme sections of the span exhaust their fall bending capacity in opposite
directions, according to the actual concrete sections and reinforcement sections. In
the calculation of the capacity of the above sections, the impacts of the axial and
perpendicular load will be also included, as specified in table 21.
Therefore on each field end, there will be two design shear force values:
The ratio between these two values (at the said end of the field) will be
calculated by the following equation (43):
(43)
102
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
The design of beam resistance to shear at the left end of a field is specified in table
21. The design of the right end will be done with adequate substitution of the stress
modes.
For high ductility level, the bending moments will be multiplied by a behavior
coefficient n = 1.25.
Table 21 – design shear force for beams with high ductility level
(The calculation has to be repeated for shear at the opposite end of the beam)
Table legend:
q1 – maximum vertical load on the beam
q2 – minimal vertical load on the beam
M1; M2 – capacity moments on both ends of the beam span (with a top sign to state the
trend)
n – behavior coefficient
L – beam length up to the intersection center
- ratio of the minimum shear force to the maximum shear force
- At each field end, up to the following distance from the column end:
o For high ductility level: 2.0 hb
o On both sides of a section where a plastic hinge can be formed, up
to a distance of hb from this section
- In an area where compression reinforcement is required,
103
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Table 22 – minimum requirements for stirrups in beams with high ductility level10
Table legend:
- longitudinal reinforcement section areas in a beam held against buckling by the
stirrup, including the relative part of bars that are not bi-directionally connected
Fsd.L – design tensile strength for longitudinal reinforcement steel
Fsd,h – design tensile strength of stirrup steel
h – diameter of stirrup bar
L – diameter of longitudinal rebar
hb – beam section height
sh – spacing between adjacent stirrups along the beam
When the stirrup perpendicular to the element axis has n branches, the section area
of one branch Ash will be calculated by equation (46) as follows:
(46)
(47A)
10
Explanation for the use of table 22 is brought in this book: Paulay T and Priestly MJN: Seismic design
of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, Wiley, New York, 1992, Clause 4.5.5.
104
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
- When and condition (47A) is not met, the shear reinforcement will
be designed as two-way inclined reinforcement at an angle of 45 (to prevent
crossed diagonal cracking), as follows:
Half of the shear will be accepted by stirrups and half on the inclined reinforcement,
if the following condition (48A) is met:
(48)
If even condition (48A) is not met, the entire shear will be accepted by two-way
inclined reinforcement, such that in each section of the beam (including the
connection to the column), in each diagonal direction there will be inclined
reinforcement whose section area will be calculated by equation (49) below:
(49)
As - section area of inclined reinforcement found in one vertical section of a beam
105
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Specification of requirements
300 mm bc
300 mm hc
l 10 bc in a fixed or cantilever column
l 16 bc in in other columns
Table legend:
l – column length
bc – column width
hc – dimension of a horizontal section of a column, perpendicular to bc and larger from it
106
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Table 24 – requirements for stirrups in different areas on a column with high ductility level
Specification of requirements
Minimum stirrup diameter 8mm h
But not less than:
Spacing between stirrups in a sensitive area:
sh = min [ 5L; bc/4; 100-mm]
In a non sensitive area
sh = min [8L; bc/3; 170-mm]
Table legend:
h – stirrup bar diameter
L – diameter of longitudinal rebar
bc – column width
sh – spacing between adjacent stirrups along the column]
sfd,h – design tensile strength of the stirrup steel or horizontal bar steel (tie stirrups)
fsd,L – design tensile strength of longitudinal reinforcement steel
Stirrups in a column section, in a sensitive area with high ductility level, will be
arranged as shown in figure 19, considering the cover thickness of the external
stirrup. For high ductility level, each longitudinal bar will be found on a column at a
stirrup corner, except for cases where a 150-mm (when the additional bar within
area a is exempted from that requirement).
A A
Close stirrup
Tie Close stirrup
Close stirrup
Tie stirrup stirrup
E D C
Figure 19 – layout of stirrups in a sensitive area in a column with high ductility level
107
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(94)
(95)
(96)
Where:
Ash,x; Ash,y – section area of all stirrup branches that are parallel to the axis in
question
hx; hy- spacing between extreme longitudinal rebars on a column in main directions
(figure 20)
108
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Where:
Muc – capacity bending moment (in the direction described in figure 12) of a column,
above and beneath an intersection
Mur - capacity bending moment (in the direction described in figure 12) of a beam, to
the right of an intersection
Mul - capacity bending moment (in the direction described in figure 12) of a beam, to
the left of an intersection
For high ductility level, on all moment resisting frame intersections, the
requirements and conditions of sections 706.2, 706.3, 706.4 will be also met.
For high ductility level, there will be no overlap of reinforcement in sensitive areas of
columns and beams around or within the intersection.
The column stirrups will be also installed inside the intersection, with the density
and diameter necessary for a sensitive area according to table 24, unless the
calculation requires more.
109
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
110
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Failure plane
Additional
Vertical bars
Legend:
111
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
A'sc; Asc - extreme vertical reinforcement section area on a column to the right and left of an
intersection
As1; As2 - horizontal reinforcement section area in a beam, above and beneath an
intersection
lc; l'c – distance between beam axes, on the stories above and beneath an intersection
l2; l1 - span between column axes, to the right and left of an intersection
l2n ; l1n – net span between column edges, to the right and left of an intersection
T''; T''' tensile force on the eternal reinforcement of the column to the right and left of an
intersection
Vjh; Vjv – design shear force at an intersection, in the horizontal and vertical direction
C's; Cs compressive force in the compression reinforcement on a beam to the right and left of
an intersection
C'''s; C''s compressive force in the compression reinforcement on a column above and
beneath the intersection
C'c; Cc compressive force in the compressed concrete in a beam, to the right and left of an
intersection
C''c; C'''c – compressive force in the compressed concrete in a column above and beneath
the intersection
The design vertical shear force at intersection Vjv, will be calculated by equation (65) below:
(65)
As1; As2 – reinforcement areas in the beam sections on both sides of the column-
beam intersection sides (1)
112
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
M1; M2 design moments on both ends of a beam span (with a top sign to state their type)
l1n; l2n length of beams on both sides of a column-beam intersection (between column edges)
- The effective width bj at the intersection (figure 13) for the shear calculations will
meet one of the conditions (60) or (61) below:
(60) when
(61) when
Where:
When the beam is eccentrically connected, with eccentricity level e (figure 5), the
effective width bj will be reduced by equation (62) below:
(62)
- The maximum design force Vjh to calculate the areas of reinforcement sections for
horizontal shear at an intersection will be limited by the following condition (63):
(63)
113
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
- The maximum design force Vjh to calculate the areas of reinforcement sections for
horizontal shear at an intersection will be reduced by the rate of concrete Vch that
carries the shear force, as follows:
A. When a beam at an intersection is subjected to force pcs (after prestressing losses)
in chords that are found within the middle third of the beam height, the shear force
will be reduced by 0.7 Pcs.
B. When a vertical compressive force is exerted on a column Nd above the intersection
(including vertical prestressing, if any) that is larger, in absolute value. than 0.1Agfcd,
but is not larger than 0.5 Agfcd, then Vjh will be reduced by the rate of the concrete
part Vch that carries the horizontal shear force, by the following equation (101):
(101)
C. When axial tensile force Nd is exerted on a column , which is less than 0.2 Agfcd
(absolute value), then Vjh will be reduced at a rate of Vch by equation (102) below:
(102)
D. When the planner prevents the formation of a plastic hinge on beams that connect
to the intersection at a distance of less than hb from the column end, and on an
external intersection when the beam reinforcement is anchored to the beam
protrusion beyond the column ,then Vjh will be reduced by the part of concrete Vch
that carries the shear force, by the following equation (103):
(103)
A's – longitudinal reinforcement section area in a beam that is found on the external
half of the compressed part of the section.
Note: in cases A-D the area of A's of the beam reinforcement which is larger than As
will not be taken into account.
E. When part of the tension bars in the beams that are connected to the
intersection are subjected to vertical bending, surround the intersection and
114
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
are anchored to the tension face of the column, then Vjh will be reduced by
the rate of concrete that resists shear Vch, by the following equation (104):
(104)
Where:
As – the smaller area out of the areas of tension bars to the right or left of
the intersection
F. In any other case, the horizontal shear force at an intersection will not be
reduced.
o The maximum vertical compressive force above the intersection will not be
more than 0.5 Agfcd.
o Total horizontal reinforcement for shear at intersection Ajh will be calculated
by the following equation (105):
(105)
- The design force for vertical shear at an intersection Vjv by equation (65) will be
reduced by the rate of concrete Vcv that resists the vertical shear force as follows:
A. When a compressive axial force is exerted on a column, on both sides of the
intersection, Vjv will be reduced by the rate of concrete Vcv that resists the design
force, by equation (106) below:
(106)
B. When an axial tensile force Nd that is less than 0.2 Agfcd is exerted on a column,
Vjv will be reduced by the rate of concrete Vcv that resists the shear force, by the
following equation (107):
(107)
Where:
115
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
C. In any other case, the vertical shear force at an intersection will not be reduced.
D. When a plastic hinge is expected on a column next to an intersection, as part of
the main mechanism to absorb energy, the reductions of sections A, B will be
cancelled.
- The total vertical reinforcement section area for shear at intersection Ajv is
calculated by equation (108) below:
(108)
And divided into vertical intermediate bars, on the column edges parallel to the
frame direction of width bj, or into vertical stirrups, at equal spacing as possible, to
be located between the corner bars on a column. The spacing between stirrups or
bars will not be more than 200-mm. One vertical bar at least out of the bars
calculated by equation (108) will be added to each end, and they will be all well
anchored on the column on both sides of the intersection.
Table 25 – seismic design requirements for ductile shear walls for high ductility level
- For a high ductility level, the shear wall thickness will be at least 150-mm
116
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(109)
When the wall fails to meet condition (109), it will also meet the requirements for a
wall squat as specified in the foreign documents in section 102.
- When the compressive strain in a wall c is larger than 0.0015, the wall thickness b'
will be increased as specified in figure 22.
The wall thickness can be reduced to dimension b if one of the two following
conditions is met:
117
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
B A
- In the vertical direction, from the wall base up to the place where a plastic hinge
can be created, and not less than condition (80) below (figure 16).
(80)
Where:
hw – wall height
- In the horizontal direction, the wall range, where the concrete compressive strain is
larger than 0.0015. The strain will be calculated as a linear strain by the worst load
combination, including seismic load (figure 16).
- The strain calculation will be done for the horizontal section of the wall, including
thickening and flanges up to a distance lw /2 on each side of the wall (figure 16). The
maximum strain on the wall end will not be more than 0.0035.
- The wall end can be without thickening, if the wall dimensions meet the
requirements of IS 466 including all parts, for a wall without thickening but with no
strengthening wall.
118
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(110)
Where:
In the absence of a more accurate method, when the area of the distributed
reinforcement section is not larger than 0.005b lw, the dimension x can be calculated
by equation (82) below:
(82)
The horizontal reinforcement ratio will also meet the following conditions (111) and
(112):
(111)
(112)
Where:
b – wall thickness
119
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Table 26 – horizontal reinforcement ratio in a sensitive area of a ductile shear wall with
high ductility level
120
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Appendix A – Accelerometers
(Normative)
In an area where Z 0.25, in any new building of 12 stories or more and in any building with
an area of stories (for licensing) above the ground level of more than 10,000 m2, accessible
measurement places for 3 accelerometers will be prepared (hereinafter: "preparation").
Each preparation will include a closable niche or cabinet and communication and power
outlets, that will be performed by the instructions of the Ministry of National Infrastructures.
The supply, installation and operation of the accelerometers and the related equipment will
be under the responsibility of the Ministry of National Infrastructures.
(Normative)
The horizontal ground acceleration factors by their location in the map of Israel are brought
in appendix H, and are available for information only on the website of the Standards
Institution of Israel (1A). The list of settlements and their ground accelerations is brought in
appendix C.
121
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Appendix C – list of settlements in Israel and their ground accelerations (the list of settlements was updated)]
(Normative)
122
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Abu Juiad
Abu Gosh
Abu Snan
Abu Serichan (tribe)
Abu Abdon (tribe)
Abu Amar (tribe)
Abu Amra (tribe)
Abu Kurinat (sett.
Abu Kurinat (tribe)
Abu Rubiya 9tribe)
Abu Rukik
Ibtin
Avtalion
Aviel
Avivim
Avigdor
Avichail
Avital
Aviezer
Abirim
Even Yehuda
Even Menachem
Even Sapir
Even Shmuel
Avnei Eitan
Avnei Chefetz
Avnet
Avshalom
123
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Adora
Adirim
Admit
Aderet
Udim
Odem
Ohad
Um El Fachem
Um El Kutuf
Um Batin
Uman
Omez
Ofakim
Or haganuz
Or Haner
Or Yehuda
Or Akiva
Ora
Oron
Orot
Ortal
Orim
Oranim
Oranit
Osha
Azur
Meitarim occ. area*
Misgav occ. Area
Achziv ind. Area (Miluot)
124
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
125
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Alon Shvut
Alonei Aba
Alonei Habashan
Alonei Itzach
Alonim
Eli Ad
Elyachin
Elipaz
Elipelet
Elyakim
Elyasiv
Elishema
Almagor
Almog
Elad
Elazar
Alphei Menashe
Alkosh
Elkana
Amunim
Amirim
Amnon
Amazia
Aniam
Asad (tribe)
Asfar
Iblin
Aazam (tribe)
Afinish (tribe)
Afik
126
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Afikim
Afek
Efrata
Arbel
Argaman
Erez
Ariel
Arsuf
Ashbol
Ashbal
AAshdod
AAshdot Yacov (Ichud)
Ashdot Yaoc (Meuchad)
Eshchar
EeSHKOLOT
eSHEL Hanasi
Ashalim
Ashquelon
Ashrat
Eshtaol
Baka-Jat*
Beer Ora
Beer Tuvia
Beer Yacov
Beer Milka
Beer Sheva
Beerot Isac
Beerotiam
Beeri
Bustan Hagalil
127
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Buyina Nugidat
Bukata
Burgata
Bochan
Batcha
Reg. school (Asher)
Bizron
Bir El Maksur
Bir Hadaj
Biriya
Beit oren
Beit El
Beit Elazari
Beit AAlfa
Beit Arie
Bei Berk
Bei Jan
Bei Govrin
Beit Gamliel
Beit Dagan
Beit Hagdi
Beit Halevi
Bei Hilel
Beit Haemek
Beit Haarava
Beit Hashita
Breit Zid
Beit Zayit
Beit Zera
Poria hospital
128
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Beit Horon
Beit Cherut
Beit Halkia
Beit Hanan
Beit Hananya
Beit Chashmonai
Beit Yeoshua
Beit Yoseph
Biet Yanai
Beit Isacc- Shaar Chefer
Beit Lechem Haglilit
Beit Meir
Beit Nechemia
Beit Nir
Beit Nekufa
Beit Oved
Beit Uziel
Beit Ezra
Beit Arif
Beit Zvi
Beit Kama
Beit Keshet
Beit Raban
Beit Rimon
Beit Shean
Beit Shemesh
Beit Shearim
Beit Shikma
Bitan Aharon
Beitar Ilit
129
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Balfuria
Ben Zakai
Ben Ami
Ben Shemen (Youth
vil)
Bnei Brak
Bnei Darom
Bnei Yehuda
Bnei Atarot
Bnei Auash
Bnei Zion
Bnei Reem
Benya
Binyamina-Givat Ada*
Bosma
Bosmat Tivon
Baana
Bazra
Bezet
Bakoa
Bakaot
Bar Giora
Bar Yochai
Brur Chail
Brosh
Bracha
Brachaya
Baraam
Barak
130
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Barkai
Barkan
Bareket
Bat Hadar
Bat Chen
Bat Chefer
Bat Yam
Bat Ayin
Bat Shlomo
Kishon refineires *
Jedida Makar
Julis
Jaljulia
Janabib (tribe)
Jiser A Zarka
Jesh (Gush Halav)
Geuli Teiman
Geulim
Galia
Gevulot
Gevim
Geva
Geva Binyamin
Geva Carmel
Givolim
The new Givon
GGivot Bar
Givat Avni
Givat Ela
Givat Brener
131
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Givat Hashlosha
Givat Zeev
Givat Chen
Givat Chaviva
Givat Haim (Ichud)
Givat Chaim (Meuchad)
Givat Yoav
Givat Yearim
Givat Yeshayahu
Guvat Koach
Givat Nili
Givat Oz
Givat Shmuel
Givat Shemesh
Givat Shapira
Givati
Givataim
Gevaram
Gvat
Gadot
Gadish
Gideona
Gdera
Gonen
Goren
Goranot Hagalil
Gazit
Gezer
Gea
Gibton
132
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Gizo
Gilon
Gilat
Geinosar
Ginigar
Ginaton
Gita
Gitit
Galon
Gilgal
Glil Yam
Gilad (Even Isac)
Gamzo
Gan Hadarom
Gan Hashomron
Gan Chaim
Gan Yoshia
Gan Yavne
Gan Ner
Gan Sorek
Gan Shlomo
Gan Shmuel
Ganot
GInot Hadar
Ganei Hadar
Ganei Yochanan
GGanei Am
Ganei Tikwa
Gaash
Gaaton
133
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Gefen
Grupit
Gashor
Gesher
Gesher Haziv
Gat (kibbutz)
Gat Rimon
Daliya El Carmel
Devora
Daburia
Dvira
Dovrat
Deganya A
Degania B
Dovev
Dolev
Dor
Dorot
Dechi
Dir El Asad
Dir Chana
Dir Rafat
Dimona
Dishon
Daliya
Demida
Dan
Daphna
Dekel
134
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Derijat
Haon
Habonim
Hagoshrim
Hadar Am
Hod Hasharon
Hodiot
Hodaya
Hawashal (tribe)
Hozil (tribe)
Hoshaya
HHazorea
Hazoryim
Hachotrim
Hayogev
Hila
Hamapil
Sorek stream res. Cen.
Hasolelim
Haogen
Har Adar
Har Gila
Har Amsha
Harel
Harduf
Herzeliya
Harrait
Vered Yericho
Vardon
Zbarga (tribe)
135
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Zevdiel
Zohar
Zikim
Zeitan
Zichron Yacov
Zecharia
Zemer
Zimat
Zanoach
Zerua
Zarzir
Zerchia
Hualad
Hualad (tribe)
Havazelet Hasharon
Hever
Hagor
Hagai
Chogla
Chad Nes
Chadid
Hadera
Chugirat (Dahar) (tribe)
Chulda
Cholon
Cholit
Hulata
Chosen
Chusaniya
Hofit
136
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chukuk
Chura
Churfish
Chorashim
Chazon
Chibat Zion
Chinanit
Haifa
Cherut
Chaluz
Chalamish
Chelez
Chamam
Chemed
Chamdiya
Chemdat
Chamra
Chaniel
Chanita
Chanaotn
Hispin
Chafetz Haim
Chefzi-ba
Chazav
Chazeva
Hazor Ashdod
Hazor Haglilit
Hazerim
Cherev Leat
Charuzim
137
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh
Charashim
Chashmonayim
Tiberia
Tuba Zangariya
Turan
Taybe
Taybe (in the valley)
Tira
Tirat Yehuda
Tirat Carmel
Tirat Zvi
Tal El
Tal Shachar
Telalim
Talomn
Tamra
Tamra (Izrael)
Yene
Tefachot
Yanuch Jat
Yevul
Yavneel
Yavne
Yagur
Yagel
Yad Binyamin
Yad Hashmona
Yad Chana
Yad Mordechai
138
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
139
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Yatzitz
Charashim Yakum
Chashmonayim Yakir
Tiberia Yokneam (moshava)
Tuba Zangariya Yokneam Ilit
Turan Yiron
Taybe Yardena
Taybe (in the valley) Yerucham
Tira Jerusalem
Tirat Yehuda Yarchiv
Tirat Carmel Yarka
Tirat Zvi Yarkona
Tal El Yesha
Tal Shachar Yishi
Telalim Yishrash
Talomn Yated
Tamra Kabul
Tamra (Izrael) Kaukab Abu El HIga
Yene Kabri
Tefachot Kaduri
Yanuch Jat Kadita
Yevul Kochav Hashachar
Yavneel Kokav Yair
Yavne KKokav Yaacov
Yagur Kochav Michael
Yagel Kurazim
Yad Binyamin Kachal
Yad Hashmona Kachla
Yad Chana Kisufim
Yad Mordechai Kishur
140
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Klil
Charashim Kalanit
Chashmonayim Kamana
Tiberia Kmehin
Tuba Zangariya Kamun
Turan Kanot
Taybe Kanaf
Taybe (in the valley) Kineret (moshava)
Tira Kineret (kibbutz)
Tirat Yehuda Kseifa
Tirat Carmel Kislon
Tirat Zvi Kseria Smia
Tal El Kaabia – Tabash - Chajara
Tal Shachar Kefar Aviv
Telalim Kefar Adumim
Talomn Kefar Uria
Tamra Kefar Achim
Tamra (Izrael) Kefar Bialik
Yene Kefar Bilu
Tefachot Kefar Blum
Yanuch Jat Kefar Bin Noon
Yevul Kefar Bara
Yavneel Kefar Baruch
Yavne Kefar Gideon
Yagur Kefar Galim
Yagel Kefar Glikson
Yad Binyamin Kefar Giladi
Yad Hashmona Kefar Daniel
Yad Chana Kefar Haoranim
Yad Mordechai Kefar Hachoresh
141
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
142
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
143
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
144
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
145
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
146
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Meitar
Charashim Mechora
Chashmonayim Mikchol
Tiberia Michmoret
Tuba Zangariya Michmanim
Turan Melea
Taybe Melilot
Taybe (in the valley) Malkia
Tira Malkishua
Tirat Yehuda Menucha
Tirat Carmel Manof
Tirat Zvi Manot
Tal El Menachamiya
Tal Shachar Manara
Telalim Manshut Zebeida
Talomn Masad
Tamra Masada
Tamra (Izrael) Mesilot
Yene Mesilat Zion
Tefachot Maslul
Yanuch Jat Masa'da
Yevul Masudin El Azazma (tribe)
Yavneel Maabarot
Yavne Maagalim
Yagur Maagan
Yagel Maagan Michael
Yad Binyamin Maoz Chaim
Yad Hashmona Maon
Yad Chana Meona
Yad Mordechai Maayan Baruch
147
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
148
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
149
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Maskiot
Charashim Mishamr Ayalon
Chashmonayim Mishamr David
Tiberia Mishmar Hayarden
Tuba Zangariya Mishmar Hanegev
Turan MMishamr Haemek
Taybe Mishmar Hashiva
Taybe (in the valley) Mishmar Hasharon
Tira Mishmarot
Tirat Yehuda Mishmeret
Tirat Carmel Mishan
Tirat Zvi Matan
Tal El Matat
Tal Shachar Matitayahu
Telalim Neot Golan
Talomn Neot Hakikar
Tamra Neot Mordechai
Tamra (Izrael) Neot Smadar
Yene Naura
Tefachot Nevatim
Yanuch Jat Negba
Yevul Negohot
Yavneel Nehura
Yavne Nahalal
Yagur Nahariya
Yagel Nov
Yad Binyamin Noga
Yad Hashmona Neve Avot
Yad Chana Nave or
Yad Mordechai Neve Ativ
150
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
151
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Nachshonim
Charashim Netua
Chashmonayim Natur
Tiberia Netayim
Tuba Zangariya Nataf
Turan Nein
Taybe Nili
Taybe (in the valley) Nizan
Tira Nizan B
Tirat Yehuda Nizana (education community)
152
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
153
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Salma
Charashim Salyit
Chashmonayim Samar
Tiberia Saad
Tuba Zangariya Saar
Turan Sapir
Taybe Stariya
Taybe (in the valley) Ajar
Tira Abadon
Tirat Yehuda Evron
154
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Einot
Charashim Ilot
Chashmonayim Ein Ayala
Tiberia Ein El Asad
Tuba Zangariya Ein Gev
Turan Ein Gedi
Taybe Ein Dor
Taybe (in the valley) Ein Habesor
Tira Ein Hod
Tirat Yehuda Ein Hachoresh
155
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
156
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Arugot
Charashim Arara
Chashmonayim Arara Banegev
Tiberia Aseret
Tuba Zangariya Atlit
Turan Atniel
Taybe Faran
Taybe (in the valley) Modiyin ind. park
Tira Emek Chefer industrial
park
Tirat Yehuda Peduel
Tirat Carmel Peduyim
Tirat Zvi Pedaya
Tal El Furidis
Tal Shachar Poria – work village
Telalim Poria – Neve Oved
Talomn Poria Ilit
Tamra Porat
Tamra (Izrael) Patish
Yene Pelech
Tefachot Palmachim
Yanuch Jat Pnei Haver
Yevul Pesagot
Yavneel Fasuta
Yavne Paamei Tashaz
Yagur Pazael
Yagel Pekiyin (Bukiya)
Yad Binyamin New Pekiyin
Yad Hashmona Pardes Chana Karkur
Yad Chana Pardeiya
Yad Mordechai Farod
157
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Farzon
Charashim Peri Gan
Chashmonayim Petach Tikwa
Tiberia Petachia
Tuba Zangariya Zeelim
Turan Zvia
Taybe Zivon
Taybe (in the valley) Zuba
Tira Zochar
Tirat Yehuda Zofia
Tirat Carmel Zofim
Tirat Zvi Zufit
Tal El Zofar
Tal Shachar Zukei yam
Telalim Zukim
Talomn Zur Hadasa
Tamra Zur Isac
Tamra (Izrael) Zur Moshe
Yene Zir Natan
Tefachot Zuriel
Yanuch Jat Zurit
Yevul Zipori
Yavneel Zalfon
Yavne Zandale
Yagur Zefariya
Yagel Zafririm
Yad Binyamin Zefat
Yad Hashmona Zerufa
Yad Chana Zora
Yad Mordechai Kevua (tribe)
158
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
159
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
160
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
161
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
162
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
163
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Shima'a
Charashim Shomrat
Chashmonayim Shimshit
Tiberia Shani
Tuba Zangariya Snir
Turan Shaab
Taybe Sha'al
Taybe (in the valley) Shaalabim
Tira Shaar Efraim
Tirat Yehuda Shaar Hagolan
Tirat Carmel Shaar Haamakim
Tirat Zvi Shaar Menashe
Tal El Shaarei Tikwa
Tal Shachar Shefayim
Telalim Shafir
Talomn Shefer
Tamra Shefaram
Tamra (Izrael) Shaked
Yene Shekef
Tefachot Sharona
Yanuch Jat Srigim (Li On)
Yevul Sarid
Yavneel Sharsheret
Yavne Shetula
Yagur Shetulim
Yagel Taashur
Yad Binyamin Tidhar
Yad Hashmona Tuval
Yad Chana Tomer
Yad Mordechai Tushiya
164
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Chermesh Timorim
Charashim Tirosh
Chashmonayim Tel Chay
Tiberia Tel Aviv Yaffo
Tuba Zangariya Tel Yoseph
Turan Tel Isac
Taybe Tel Mond
Taybe (in the valley) Tel Adashim
Tira Tel Kazir
Tirat Yehuda Tel Sheva
Tirat Carmel Tel Teomim
Tirat Zvi Telem
Tal El Talmei Eliyahu
Tal Shachar Talmei Eliezer
Telalim Talemi Bilu
Talomn Talmei Yoseph
Tamra Talmei Yechuel
Tamra (Izrael) Talmei Yafe
Yene Telamim
Tefachot Timrat
Yanuch Jat Tenuvut
Yevul Taoz
Yavneel Binyamin indus. zone*
Yavne Bar Lev indus. zone
Yagur Lower Galilee ind. zone
Yagel Dalot ind. Zone
Yad Binyamin Hasharon ind. Zone
Yad Hashmona Hof Yavne ind. Zone
Yad Chana Chazav ind. Zone*
Yad Mordechai Mivza ind. Zone*
165
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
166
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(Normative)
167
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(Normative)
The requirements of section E-1 have to be met when conducting specific site response
survey as specified in section 202.2.23. The analysis will be documented in a report.
The earthquake response spectrum with the specified probability (for example 2% or 10% in
50 years) will be developed for the base rock, considering the requirements specified in the
standard or in section E-2. If analysis as described in section E-2 is not carried out, the
response spectrum of the base rock with the specified probability will be developed
assuming a site with ground type B (table 1). If the rock at the site is ground type A, the
response spectrum of the base rock will be adapted using the site coefficients as specified in
tables 2 and 3 of the standard, unless the use of other site coefficients can be justified. At
least five horizontal ground motion acceleration time records are required, that document
seismic events that actually took place, or at least 15 that document simulated events – will
be selected out of the events having magnitude and distance from fault that correspond
with the magnitude and distance from fault of the dominant event at the site. For each
record, the accelerations will be made to a scale, such that on average, the response
spectrum for each of the documented events will be, approximately, within the response
spectrum level as defined above, for the significant cycle time range for the structure
response at the site.
A model of the site response will be developed based on the shear wave velocities for a low
strain level, non-linear relations or equivalent linear relation between the shear stress and
strain, and the specific weights of the ground specimen. These shear wave velocities will be
determined based on measurements at the said site, or by measurements of similar ground
specimen at the site environment. The nonlinear relations or equivalent linear relations
between the shear stress and strain and the specific weights will be selected based on lab
tests or known relations for similar ground specimen. The uncertainties related to the
ground properties will be evaluated.
The sub-soil model that will be taken into account in the site response survey will include all
layers from the ground level up to the hard bedding that is characteristic of the researched
area (base rock). The accurate definition of this hard bedding (lime, dolomite, basalt etc.)
changes by the different geological conditions of Israel, and its depth can reach hundreds of
meters. When conducting the survey, a geologist who knows the geological structure of the
sub-soil in the area has to be employed. For areas suspected of increased irregular sub-soil,
the hard bedding that can generate irregular amplifications is defined in the report of the
geological institution GSI/15/2009.
168
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
When the hard bedding is at such depth that obtaining information about the thickness of
layers and their physical properties at the bottom of the section is impractical, then
information from adjacent boreholes can be used to evaluate the thickness of layers that
were not drilled and their composition, and evaluate their physical properties accordingly. In
such case, the evaluation of uncertainties will be also done for the thickness of layers. the
earthquake response spectrum and the records of the base rock motions that were
developed by section E-1 will be adapted to the ground type set as the hard bedding, using
the site coefficients that are brought in tables 2 and 3 in the standard.
The records of the base rock motions will serve as input for the ground section, assuming
they are motions of the rock layers exposed above the ground surface (outcrop). The ground
section response and records of the ground surface motions will be determined using
corresponding calculation methods, that refer to the non-linear properties of the ground in a
nonlinear way or equivalent linear way. The ratios of the structure response spectrum (with
5% damping) for the ground surface motions and the structure response spectrum (with 5%
damping) for the base rock motions that is used as input for the ground profile,. The
recommended response profile at the ground surface will not be lower than the response
spectrum for the base rock motions, multiplied by the mean spectral ratio between the
response spectrum at the ground surface and the response spectrum at the base rock (for
each cycle time in separate), that is obtained from analyses of the site response. The
recommended motions at the ground surface that are obtained by analysis will reflect the
reference to the response sensitivity to uncertainty concerning the ground properties,
model depth, and motions used as input.
The requirements of section E-2 will be met when analyzing the impact due to ground
motions. The analysis will take into account the regional tectonic environment, geological
data and the seismic activity, the expected reoccurrence rate of earthquakes at known faults
and source areas and their expected maximum magnitudes, the attenuation properties of
the ground motions, the impact of noises adjacent to their source areas – if there are such
impacts – on the ground motions, and the impact of the conditions beneath the surface level
at the site. The conditions beneath the surface level at the site will be considered by using
attenuation relations that represent the local and regional geological conditions or by
implementation of the requirements of section E-1. The analysis will include updated
interpretation of the seismic activity, including the uncertainty in the use of models and
parameter values for sources of seismic activity and ground motions. The analysis will be
documented in a report.
For any required probability, the spectrum acceleration Sa obtained from analysis of the site
response at any cycle time will not be less than 80% of that calculated by section 202.
169
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
In sites where the ground is of type F, where the site response has to be analyzed by table 1,
the spectral acceleration for design for any cycle time will not be less than 80% of the one
corresponding with sites of E class.
When the site analysis is analyzed to determine the ground motions according to section E-
3, SDS will be taken as the spectral acceleration Sa that is obtained from the site specific
response spectrum with cycle time of 0.2 seconds, as long as this parameter is not lower
than 905 of the peak value of the spectrum acceleration Sa for any cycle time that is larger
than 0.2 seconds. For the purpose of calculation, SD1 will equal the larger of the spectrum
acceleration values Sa with cycle time of one second, or twice the value of the spectral
acceleration Sa with a cycle time of 2 seconds.
170
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
If the total shear force at the base, as obtained from modal analysis, is less than 0.85 FH, it is
recommended to reconsider the suitability of the calculation model for the planned
structure.
FH – total horizontal design load, that is obtained by equivalent static analysis from
equations (7) and (22) of the standard, with the limitations of section 204.2.
171
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(normative)
11
For this map at a higher resolution, please see the website of the Standards Institution of Israel,
www.sii.org.ilo, Israeli Standards, annexes to IS 413 amendment sheet 5.
172
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(Normative)
Figure H-1: map s1 for return period of 475 years (10% in 50 years) Vs30 = 760 m/s (ground
class B)
173
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-2: map ss for return period of 475 years (10% in 50 years) Vs30 = 760 m/s (ground
class B)
174
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-3: map Z for return period of 475 years (10%@50 years) for ground class B
175
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-4: map for the value TL (Seconds) for return period of 475 years (10%@50 years)
176
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-5: map S1 for return period of 975 years (5%@50 years) Vs30 = 760 m/s (ground
class B)
177
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-6: map Ss for return period of 975 years (5%@50 years) Vs30 = 760 m/s (ground
class B)
178
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-7: map Z for return period of 975 years (5%@50 years) for ground class B
179
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-8: map for the value TL (seconds) for return period of 975 years (5%@50 years)
180
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-9: map for return period of 2475 years (2%@50 years), VS30 = 760m/s (ground
class B)
181
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-10: map for return period of 2475 years (2%@50 years), VS30 = 760m/s (ground
class B)
182
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-11: map for return period of 2475 years (2%@50 years) for ground class B
183
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Figure H-12: map for the value of TL (seconds) for return period of 2475 years (2%@50y)
184
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
(normative)
185
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Map of areas
suspected as
increasing
irregualr subsoil
Legend
Rock site
Regualr soil area
Soil site with suspcision of irregular increase as a The schematic section demonstrating possible combinations of geological units
result of the existence of hard bedding at the base
Site wsuspected of irregfular increase at naroow and on the lowland and coastal plane of Israel, which create strong return of
depp geological ponds earthquake waves and might result in irregular increase of ground motions
during earthquake. The numbers approximately indicate the shear wave velocity
in units of meter per second. A thick red line indicates seismic return with
approximate impedance ratio of 4 and up, whose depth in the range can cause
irregular increase. This figure is designed for illustration only and must not be
used for increase calculations without detailed survey of the investigated area.
186
Israeli Standard IS 413
Combined version of the standard of June 1995, as amended
Error correction
IS 413
May 2014
In the part that specifies the horizontal spectrum acceleration values on a rock, on the first
right column, the column heading Ss = 0.5 will be omitted and replaced by:
Ss 0.25.
187