Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pop 3 Marchan 10
Pop 3 Marchan 10
emarchan@vistacharterps.or
Elizabeth Marchan Social Studies 8th
g
Mentor Email School/District Date
NT pedagogical skills are newly formed and Skills are developing as NT investigates Skills are applied as NT makes Skills are refined as NT combines elements Skills are polished as NT expands ability to
just coming into prominence and examines pedagogical practices increased relevant and suitable use of into a cohesive and unified pedagogical add new methods and strategies into
pedagogical choices repertoire pedagogical repertoire
CSTP Element Initial Rating Rating Description (Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2.)
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 1 of 12
Part A: NT Reflection Part B: ME Feedback
Use questions to guide reflection on the lesson plan. Provide feedback on lesson plan reflection.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 12
Once I have finished the mini-lesson, I
will explain the lesson activity. I will
have instructions printed and simplified
for my students with learning needs. I
will model how to complete the activity
using amendment 1 of the Bill of Rights.
I will use body language and visuals to
help model the activity. This will be
helpful for my students with learning
needs and my EL students. The lesson
activity has been formatted as a graphic
organizer. Graphic organizers have been
shown to help all students organize their
information, but especially students with
learning needs and EL students. The
lesson activity will be
modified/accommodated to meet the
individual needs of my students. My
students will also be working with their
Kagan partners (A/B partners). They will
be reading out loud to each other, this
will help them practice their speaking
skills. They will be practicing how to
communicate in a professional and
positive manner with their peers.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 6 of 12
As students are working with their
partners, I will walk around to check in
on each partnership to monitor progress.
- All students
- “Stand Up, Hand participated in “Stand
Up, Pair Up” Up, Hand Up, Pair
structure is a good Up.” Shared their
structure to use with answers to the scenario
all students. EL posed in the quick
students can write. All students
practice their were engaged.
language skills, and - Students worked on
students with their lesson activity
with their A/B I definitely appreciate my MT’s
learning needs can
partners. All students feedback in regard to my
practice social
seemed to be on task concerns. I’m glad that I was
skills.
Specific Feedback able to provide the necessary
What information can you - Used body and engaged.
provide the NT regarding accommodations/modifications
requested special language and - EL students and
for my students. This is an area
students with
feedback?
visuals. This is an
that I continue to work on as a
effective strategy learning needs
teacher, especially because I
for EL students and worked on their
work in an inclusive setting.
students with assignments with
learning needs. their partner with
- Modeled the lesson little teacher
activity. Translated support. Great job
instructions in scaffolding and
Spanish. modeling for these
- Assigned students. The
individual modification/accom
modified versions modations were
of the assignment appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 8 of 12
to EL students and
students with
learning needs
- Students were
engaged through
established classroom
rules and procedures.
- Students discussed
their answers through
a Kagan structure. The
scenario given in the
quick write was
interesting to the
students so they were
all engaged.
- Teacher walked
around to check on
students during the
Kagan structure. - Students walked into
- Monitored learning classroom, opened
through frequent CFU their Chromebooks
I was really glad to see that the
CSTP 1: Engaging All questions embedded and began working
Students accommodations/modifications
In what ways were students throughout the mini- on their quick write.
I provided my focus students
engaged? How were
students not engaged? lesson. - Students discussed
were appropriate. For the next
How did students contribute
to their learning? - Walked around to answers with one
partner activity, however, I will
How did teacher and/or
individually check in another during a
students monitor learning? make sure that I partner my EL
How were the focus students
engaged and supported
on each A/B partner “Stand Up, Hand Up, student with a different partner
throughout the lesson? throughout the lesson Pair Up.” that will encourage her to work.
activity. - Worked with A/B
- Focus student #1 and partners on lesson
her partner were a activity.
little distracted at
times, but overall, she
seemed to be on task.
- Focus student #3
hardly needed re-
directing because he
was too busy helping
translate parts of the
assignment for his
partner.
- Focus student #2 was
engaged in the activity
and discussed
answers with his
partner. I think you
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 9 of 12
did a great job pairing
him with the right
partner.
- Teacher walked
around to check in - Students interacted
individually on positively with one
I always try to establish and
students during another during
maintain a positive learning
lesson activity. Kagan structure.
environment from the
- Teacher was - Students positively
beginning of the school year
encouraging and interacted with one
CSTP 2: Effective Learning because I want my students to
Environment teacher-student another during the
feel safe and to enjoy being in
How did students and
teacher contribute to an interactions were lesson activity. They
my classroom. I was glad to see
effective learning
positive. discussed the
environment? that my MT was able to notice
- It is very clear that amendments. It is this during my observation. I
the students respect clear that you have a also try to make sure that I
the teacher, and that very positive create positive relationships
teacher has good effective learning with my students.
rapport with her environment in your
students. classroom.
- Teacher structured
the lesson to help all
her students succeed. I wish I had given my students
- Made the material more time to ask more
- Students shared questions. My students always
relevant to her
answers with one have a million questions every
students through
another during “Stand year when they learn about the
scenario posed in
Up, Hand Up, Pair Constitution and the Bill of
CSTP 3: Organizing Subject
quick write.
Matter Up.” Rights. I need to figure out a
What actions of the NT - Teacher modeled how
contributed to student - Asked more questions way to provide them with
assimilation of subject to how to highlight
matter? of teacher during enough time to ask questions
How did students construct key information,
knowledge of subject mini-lesson. and to, perhaps, answer their
matter? words in mini-lesson.
What misconceptions did - Students also asked own questions. The fact that
- Misconceptions were
individual questions they were asking so many
students have and how
addressed during
were they addressed by the
teacher?
during lesson activity questions, however, makes
mini-lesson and
as teacher was realize that they were that
partner activity.
checking in with engaged with the lesson and the
- Teacher walked material. I’m glad that they
them.
around to individually were invested in what they
check in on student were learning.
progress and
understanding.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 10 of 12
- Kinesthetic learners
were supported
through the Kagan
structure since they
were able to stand up
and talk to their
partners.
- Students were Differentiating instruction for
supported with students in an inclusive setting
visual aids, can seem like a dauting task,
- “Stand Up, Hand Up,
translation and but the more practice I get the
Pair Up.” Students
modeling. easier it becomes. When I
shared their answers
- Auditory learners spoke to my mentor teacher
with one another.
were supported with about this, she always reminds
- Students asked
CSTP 4: Learning
the verbal me that the strategies we use
Experiences questions throughout
How were students explanation of are always good strategies for
supported through the lesson. They also
differentiated instruction? instructions, mini- all students, regardless of their
How did students asked for clarification
participate? lesson. learning needs. I also was
How did the NT contribute to and they participated appreciative that my mentor
- Teacher modeled
in partner
student learning?
- Praised students to highlight and focus answer. I was glad to see that
during individual on key words in the many of my students were
check-ins with text. using the tips I gave them as
partners. they worked independently.
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 11 of 12
To what degree did students My students achieved the lesson objectives to a very high degree. The class average on the exit
achieve lesson objectives?
ticket was a 90%.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
To what degree did focus My student with learning My focus student #3 also met
students achieve lesson My EL student met the lesson
needs met the lesson objective. the lesson objective. He
objectives? objective. She scored a 80% on
He scored a 90% on the exit scored a 100% on his exit
her exit ticket.
ticket. ticket.
Next time, I would leave more time for student generated questions. My students wanted to
What would you do differently
next time? continue asking questions, but I had to stop them to keep lesson on track. I would have a
question box or give my students sticky notes so that they could ask more questions.
The 3 top lesson strengths were:
1) I made the material relevant to my students.
What were three top Lesson 2) The accommodations/modifications I provided for my EL students and my
Strengths?
students with learning needs were appropriate.
3) The exit ticket that shows that the average was a 90%, which shows that my
students met the lesson objective.
The 3 top areas for improvement were:
What were three top areas for 1) I would give more time for student-generated questions.
improvement?
2) Give more time for students to work with one another during the lesson activity.
3) I would find a different partner for my EL student.
My students will continue to analyze the Bill of Rights by applying what they have learned.
What are next steps? They are going to be pretending to be Supreme Court Justices and they will be reading and
deciding cases.
Other Comments/Notes
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 12 of 12