Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DPCR 2019 - ATM Michael S Udan - 1st Semester
DPCR 2019 - ATM Michael S Udan - 1st Semester
DPCR 2019 - ATM Michael S Udan - 1st Semester
I, MICHAEL S. UDAN, Audit Team Member of Cluster 7, Team CAR 29 National Government Sector, Commission on Audit - Cordillera Administrative Region, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on
the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period January 1 to June 30, 2019:
___________________________
MICHAEL S. UDAN
State Auditing Examiner II
Audit Team Member
Date: ___December 13, 2019
Recommending Approval:
___________________________
MICHAEL P. ANDAYA
State Auditor III
OIC - Audit Team Leader
Date: December 13, 2019
Approved by:
___________________________
DIONISIO B. BERNAL
State Auditor V
Regional Supervising Auditor
Date: __________________________
Page 1 of 142
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (DPCR) FORM
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
A. Program 1: Government Auditing Program
Sub-Program 1. National Government Audit Sub-Program
Output Indicators
1.1 Number of Assisted in Preparation of Assisted in Preparation of Audit Assisted in Preparation MSU
Audit Working Papers per Working Papers per assigned of Fourteen (14) Audit
Government Audit assigned audit program/audit audit program/audit procedures Working Papers per
Reports transmitted procedures on Audit Thrust and submitted to the ATL for assigned audit
Areas identified in the review within 5 CD from program/audit
GAIs/SAIs issued by NGS completion procedures and 4.90 5.00 5.00 4.97
Cluster 7 submitted to the ATL for
review within 5 CD from
within the completion
reglementary period
a. Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 4 MLs on Assisted in the Draft of MSU
MLs/RCMLs on NGS Cluster 7 NGS Cluster 7 agencies and One (1) ML on NGS
agencies and submitted to the submitted to the ATL on or before Cluster 7 and submitted
Audit Team Leader (ATL) and March 13, 2019 for review and to ATL on March 12,
Audit Team's Report on the transmital to the Management on 2019. Assisted in the
Status of Submission and March 25, 2019. Draft of Three (3) MLs
Transmittal of MLs/RCMLs and submitted to ATL on 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
March 13, 2019.
Page 2 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
b. Assisted in the Draft of Cash Assisted in the Draft of 100% MSU
Examination Reports (CERs) CERs with shortages and Due for Second
and Audit Team's Status submitted to the ATL within 18
Report on Cash Examination CDs from completion of field Semester
Conducted and Transmitted work.
CERs
Assisted in the Draft of 100% MSU
CERs with shortages and
submitted to the ATL within 18 Due for Second
CDs from completion of field Semester
work.
c. Assisted in the draft of Audit Assisted in the Draft of 100% Assisted in the Draft of MSU
Observation Memorandum AOMs with supporting papers on 100% Eleven (11) AOMs
(AOM) and Audit audit areas identified in the SAI with supporting papers
Rejoinder/Reply (2019 and submitted to the ATL for on audit areas identified
Accounts and Transactions) review within 5 CDs from in the SAI and submitted 4.90 5.00 5.00 4.97
completion. to the ATL for review
within 5 CDs from
Completion
Page 3 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
d. Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100% MSU None for 1st
Notices of Suspension, NS/ND/NCand submitted to the
Disallowance and Charge ATL within 5 CDs from Semester
(NS/ND/NC) completion.
e. Assited in the Draft Notice of Assisted in the Draft of 100% Assisted in the Draft of MSU
Settlement of Suspension, NSSDC and submitted to the ATL 100% Three (3) NSSDCs
Disallowance and Charge within 5 CDs from completion. and submitted to the
(NSSDC) ATL. One (1) NSSDC
submitted on January
16, 2019. Two (2)
NSSDCs on June 27, 4.90 5.00 5.00 4.97
2019.
f. Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100% Assisted in the Draft of MSU
Statements of Suspension, SASDC and submitted to the ATL 100% Four (4) SASDCs
Disallowance and Charge within 5 CDs from receipt of draft and submitted to the
(SASDC) from ATM. ATL within 5 CDs from
completion. Two (2)
SASDCs for 4th Qtr CY
2018 were submitted on
January 3, 2019. Two (2)
for 1st Qtr CY 2019 on 4.90 5.00 5.00 4.97
April 4, 2019.
Output Indicators
1.2. Percentage of Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of Monitoring MSU
increase of
increase ofaudit
audit Monitoring report on the report on the increase in the
recommendations
recommendations increase in the implementation of prior years'
implementation of prior audit recommendations
implemented by years' audit recommendations contained in the CY 2018 MLs and Due for 2nd
agencies contained in the CY 2018 MLs submitted to th ATL on or before Semester
and submitted Action Plan and July 3, 2019
Monitoring Tool (APMT)
Page 4 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Sub-Program 4. Special Audit Sub-program
Output Indicators
4.1. No. of Fraud Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100% MSU
Case Evaluation Complaint Assesment Forms CAFs and submitted to the ATL
(CAFs) on Complaints/ Audit within 25 CDs upon receipt of
Reports submitted Investigations received from memo/ referral on complaints/
by teams from ORD audit investigation. (Item III.3, 4 & None for 1st
FAO within the 5 of COA Memo No. 2015-007 Semester
dated April 16, 2015 and COA CAR
prescribed deadline Memo dated Jul. 25, 2019)
Audit Team's Quarterly Assisted in the Draft of Audit Assisted in the Draft of MSU
Report on Request for Write- Team's QRRWO and submitted to Four (4) QRRWOs and
off (QRRWO) the ATL within 7 CDs after EOQ submitted to the ATL.
Two (2) QRRWOs for 4th
Qtr CY 2018 were 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
submitted on January 6,
2019. Two (2) QRRWOs
for 1st Qtr CY 2019 were
submitted on April 4,
2019.
Audit Team's Matrices, Assisted in the Draft of Audit Assisted in the Draft of MSU
financial and operational team's Matrices, financial and Two (2) Matrices,
highlights; and Status of operational highlights; and Status financial and operational
Implementation of PY Audit of Implementation of PY Audit highlights; and Status of
Recommendations on DRRM Recommendations on DRRM Implementation of PY
Funds for CY 2018 Funds for CY 2018 and submitted Audit Recommendations
to the ATL on or before June 19, on DRRM Funds for CY
2019. 2018 and submitted to
the ATL on June 18, 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
2019.
Page 5 of 142
Recommendations on DRRM Implementation of PY
Funds for CY 2018 and submitted Audit Recommendations
to the ATL on or before June 19, on DRRM Funds for CY
2019. 2018 and submitted to
the ATL on June 18,
2019.
Page 6 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Audit Team's Status Report of Assisted in the Draft of Audit Assisted in the Draft of MSU
all receivables, unliquidated team's Report of all receivables, Two (2) Reports of all
cash advances and fund unliquidated cash advances and receivables,
transfers fund transfers and submitted to unliquidated cash
the ATL by advances and fund 4.90 5.00 5.00 4.97
transfers and submitted
to the ATL on January 4,
⦁ Jan. 20, 2019 for status 2019.
report as of Dec 31, 2018
⦁ July 20, 2019 for status
report as of June 30, 2019
Audit Team's SASDC Report Assisted in the Draft of Audit Assisted in the Draft of MSU
Team's SASDC report and 100% Four (4) SASDCs
submitted to the ATL within 7 CDs and submitted to the
after EOQ. ATL. Two (2) SASDCs for
4th Qtr CY 2018 were
submitted on January 3, 4.90 5.00 5.00 4.97
2019. Two (2) SASDCs
for 1st Qtr CY 2019 were
on April 4, 2019.
Total 74.67
Average Rating (Average/Outputs) 4.98
Average Rating x Weight Allocation 4.729
Page 7 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Program 2: Government Accountancy Program
Output Indicator
2. Number of Comments on proposed/ draft Not Applicable
government government accounting
standards, policies, rules and
accounting regulations
standards, policies,
rules and
regulations
formulated and
developed for
implementation in
government
agences
Total
Average Rating (Average/Outputs)
Average Rating x Weight Allocation
Program 3: Government Financial Adjudication Program
Output Indicator
1. Number of Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100% MSU
pending and new decision on (a) Request for decisions and submitted to the None for 1st
Relief from Accountability and ATL within 25 CDs from receipt of
cases decided (2) Request for Writing-Off of request. Semester
accounts involving amounts
P100,000.00 and below
2. Number of Drafted Answer to the Order Assisted in the Draft and MSU
Decision of the received from the ORD/OCD submitted 100% Answer to the
Group affirmed by for the Appeal from ND/NC ATL within 8 CDs from receipt of
the ORD/OCD and for the denied Requests the Order None for 1st
for Relief from Accountability Semester
and for Write-Off of accounts.
3. Number of final a. Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100% MSU
and executory Notices of Finality of Decision NFDs for all Decisions that
(NFDs) issued for all Decisions became final and executory at the
cases enforced that became final and audit team level fprwarded to the
executory at the audit team ATL within 4 CDs after the lapse None for 1st
level of the prescribed period appeal Semester
pursuant to the following COA
issuances:
Page 8 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
dated December 19, 2016
on Request for Write-Off
Page 9 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
b. Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100% MSU
request for the issuance of COEs for all NFDs issued at the
COA Orders of Execution audit team level without
(COEs) for all NFDs issued at settlement within the prescribed
the audit team level without period and forwarded to the ATL None for 1st
settlement within the not ealier than 5 CDs from receipt
prescribed period of the NFD by the agency heads
(Section 23.2 of the RRSA) Semester
Total
Average Rating (Average/Outputs)
Average Rating x Weight Allocation
General Administration and Support
1. General a. Reviewed Action on
supervision and Personnel Matters, as
management of follows:
the Regional i. Proposed Office Order for Not Applicable
Office assignment/ reassignment/
designation of the audit team
personnel
Page 10 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
vi. Signed Statement of Prepared Statement of Assets, Prepared Statement of MSU
Assets, Liabilities and Net Liabilities and Net Worth of Audit Assets, Liabilities and
Worth of audit group Team personnel submitted to the Net Worth of Audit Team
personnel ORSA on or before Feburary 25, personnel submitted to
2019 for signature and the ORSA and
transmittal to ATFS. (CSC Memo transmittal to ATFS on 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Circular no. of 2015 dated Feb. 17, Feburary 23, 2019
2015)
vii. Attended GAD Learning Attended GAD Learning Session Audit Team
Session by end of December 2019 Attended GAD Learning 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Session on May 31, 2019
b. Reviewed action on
logistics and other
administrative support
relative to the following:
⦁ Monthly Report of MRAU submitted to the ATL Six (6) MRAUs Audit Team
Absences and within 3 WDs after the EOM submitted to the ATL
Undertimes (MRAU) within 3 WDs after the
(MRAU) EOM 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Page 11 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
⦁ Quarterly Report of Not Applicable
Approved and
Disapproved Leaves
Page 12 of 142
Commission on Audit - Cordillera Administrative Region Name: MICHAEL S. UDAN
National Government Sector - Cluster 7, Public Works, Transport and Energy Position: State Auditing Examiner II
Matrix of Actual Accomplishments for 1st Semester 2019 Designation: Audit Team Member
Page 13 of 142
Assisted in the Draft of End of 4th Qtr
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS
Consolidated Quarterly Status Quantity CY 2018 Timeliness
Performance Report(Target
on Cash Examination
+ Measures) Qty Rating Date Received Date Acted/ No. of CDs Equivalent Rating Justification/
Measure Conducted and Transmitted CERs End of 1st Qtr Submitted/Signed delay Points Remarks
and submitted to the ATL within Cy 2019 Deducted
18 CDs after EOQ
Page 14 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Quantity Timeliness
Performance (Target + Measures) Qty Rating Date Received Date Acted/ No. of CDs Equivalent Rating Justification/
Measure Submitted/Signed delay Points Remarks
Deducted
c. Assisted in the draft of Audit Assisted in the Draft of 100%
Observation Memorandum AOMs with supporting papers on
(AOM) and Audit audit areas identified in the SAI
Rejoinder/Reply (2019 and submitted to the ATL for
Accounts and Transactions) review within 5 CDs from 11/11 5.00 As need Various dates - - 5.00
completion. arises
f. Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100% End of 4th Qtr 1/3/2019 (2 SASDCs)
Statements of Suspension, SASDC and submitted to the ATL CY 2018
Disallowance and Charge within 5 CDs from completion. 4/4 5.00 End of 1st Qtr - - 5.00
(SASDC) Cy 2019 4/4/2019 (2 SASDCs)
Output Indicators
1.2. Percentage of Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of Monitoring
increase of
increase ofaudit
audit Monitoring report on the report on the increase in the
recommendations
recommendations increase in the implementation of prior years'
implementation of prior audit recommendations
implemented by years' audit recommendations contained in the CY 2018 MLs and Due for Second
contained in the CY 2018 MLs submitted to th ATL on or before
and submitted Action Plan and July 3, 2019
agencies Monitoring Tool (APMT) Semester
Page 15 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Quantity Timeliness
Performance (Target + Measures) Qty Rating Date Received Date Acted/ No. of CDs Equivalent Rating Justification/
Measure Submitted/Signed delay Points Remarks
Deducted
Sub-Program 2. Corporate Government Auditing Sub-Program
Sub-Program 3. Local Government Auditing Sub-Program
Sub-Program 4. Special Audit Sub-program
Output Indicators
4.1. No. of Fraud Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100%
Case Evaluation Complaint Assesment Forms CAFs and submitted to the ATL
(CAFs) on Complaints/ Audit within 25 CDs upon receipt of
Reports submitted Investigations received from memo/ referral on complaints/ None for 1st
by teams from ORD audit investigation. (Item III.3, 4 & Semester
FAO within the 5 of COA Memo No. 2015-007
dated April 16, 2015 and COA CAR
prescribed deadline Memo dated Jul. 25, 2019)
Audit Team's Quarterly Assisted in the Draft of Audit End of 4th Qtr
Report on Request for Write- Team's QRRWO and submitted to 4/4 CY 2018 1/6/2019 (2) - - 5.00
off (QRRWO) the ATL within 7 CDs after EOQ 5.00 End of 1st Qtr
Cy 2019 4/4/2019 (2)
Page 16 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Quantity Timeliness
Performance (Target + Measures) Qty Rating Date Received Date Acted/ No. of CDs Equivalent Rating Justification/
Measure Submitted/Signed delay Points Remarks
Deducted
Audit Team's Requests for Assisted in the Draft of Requests
Authority to Dispose of for Authority to Dispose of
Records Records and submitted to the ATL
within 4 CDs upon completion of
documentary requirements. None for 1st
Semester
Audit Team's SASDC Report Assisted in the Draft of Audit End of 4th Qtr 1/3/2019 (2 SASDCs)
Team's SASDC report and 4/4 5.00 CY 2018 - - 5.00
submitted to the ATL within 7 CDs End of 1st Qtr
after EOQ. Cy 2019 4/4/2019 (2 SASDCs)
Page 17 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Quantity Timeliness
Performance (Target + Measures) Qty Rating Date Received Date Acted/ No. of CDs Equivalent Rating Justification/
Measure Submitted/Signed delay Points Remarks
Deducted
Program 3: Government Financial Adjudication Program (0%)
Output Indicator
1. Number of Assisted in the Draft of Assisted in the Draft of 100%
pending and new decision on (a) Request for decisions and submitted to the
Relief from Accountability and ATL within 25 CDs from receipt of
cases decided (2) Request for Writing-Off of request. None for 1st
accounts involving amounts Semester
P100,000.00 and below
Page 18 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Quantity Timeliness
Performance (Target + Measures) Qty Rating Date Received Date Acted/ No. of CDs Equivalent Rating Justification/
Measure Submitted/Signed delay Points Remarks
Deducted
General Administration and Support (5%)
1. General a. Reviewed Action on
supervision and Personnel Matters, as
management of follows:
the Regional i. Proposed Office Order for Not Applicable
Office assignment/ reassignment/
designation of the audit team
personnel
Page 19 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Quantity Timeliness
Performance (Target + Measures) Qty Rating Date Received Date Acted/ No. of CDs Equivalent Rating Justification/
Measure Submitted/Signed delay Points Remarks
Deducted
b. Reviewed action on
logistics and other
administrative support
relative to the following:
⦁ Quarterly Assisted in the Preparation of QAR 4/4 5.00 End of 4th Qtr 1/3/2019 (2)
and submitted to ATL on or before CY 2018
Accomplishment Report the 4th day of the following month End of 1st Qtr - - 5.00
(QAR) after the EOQ Cy 2019 4/4/2019 (2)
Page 20 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Quantity Timeliness
Performance (Target + Measures) Qty Rating Date Received Date Acted/ No. of CDs Equivalent Rating Justification/
Measure Submitted/Signed delay Points Remarks
Deducted
E. Other Activities Special Assignments None for 1st
Semester
Page 21 of 142
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR) FORM
1.2 Number of a. Transmitted AARs on SUCs AARs on _____ SUCs and ____
National Government and Other NGS Stand Alone Other NGS Stand Alone
audit report agencies to agency heads agencies transmitted to agency
transmitted on time heads on or before June 30,
2018
Page 22 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
c. Transmitted RCMLs on NGS RCMLs on ____ NGS agencies
agencies to agency heads transmitted on or before the
deadline set by the NGS
Page 23 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
1.3 Number of AARs on SUCs and Other NGS AARs on ____ SUCs and ____
National Government Stand Alone agencies furnished Other NGS Stand Alone
audit reports furnished to Congress, to the President agencies furnished to Congress,
to Congress, to the and other oversight agencies to the President and other
President and other oversight agencies within 5
oversight agencies WDs after June 30, 2018
Outcome Indicators
1. % of the number of a. Status Report on the Status Report on the
prepared audit reports transmittal and submission to transmittal and submission to
transmitted to ITO for publication of ITO for publication of
auditees, Congress and transmitted AARs on SUCs and transmitted AARs on SUCs and
other oversight Other NGS Stand Alone agencies Other NGS Stand Alone
agencies within the agencies submitted to OAC-LGS
deadline set by the within 10 WDs after the EO
Commission month, starting in May 2018
and every month thereafter
Page 24 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
1.1 Number of a. Specific Audit Instructions Specific Audit Instructions
Corporate Government issued by the Corporate issued by CGS disseminated to
Agencies with AAR Government Sector (CGS) CGS Audit Groups/Teams
disseminated to CGS Audit within 5 WDs from receipt
Groups/Teams
1.2 Number of a. Transmitted AARs on WDs AARs on ____ WDs and ____
Corporate Government and Other CGS Stand Alone Other CGS Stand Alone agencies
audit report agencies to agency heads transmitted to agency heads on
transmitted on time or before June 30, 2018
Page 25 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
e. Monitoring Report on the Monitoring Report on the status
status of submission and of submission and transmittal
transmittal of AARs, MLs of AARs, MLs and RCMLs and
RCMLs and SAORs SAORs submitted to OAC-LGS
within 10 WDs after EO month,
starting March 2018
1.3 Number of AARs on WDs and Other CGS AARs on ____ WDs and ____
Corporate Government Stand Alone agencies furnished Other CGS Stand Alone agencies
audit reports furnished to Congress, to the President furnished to Congress, to the
to Congress, to the and other oversight agencies President and other oversight
President and other agencies within 5 WDs after
oversight agencies June 30, 2018
Outcome Indicators
1. % of the number of a. Status Report on the Status Report on the
prepared audit reports transmittal and submission to transmittal and submission to
transmitted to ITO for publication of ITO for publication of
auditees, Congress and transmitted AARs on WDs and transmitted AARs on WDs and
other oversight Other CGS Stand Alone agencies Other CGS Stand Alone agencies
agencies within the submitted to OAC-LGS within
deadline set by the 10 WDs after the EO month
Commission starting in May 2018 and every
month thereafter
Page 26 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
2. % of increase of Monitoring Report on the Monitoring Report on the
audit increase in the implementation increase in the implementation
recommendations of prior years' (PY) audit of PY audit recommendations
implemented by recommendations contained in contained in the CY 2017 AARs
agencies the CY 2017 AARs submitted to OAC-LGS on or
before July 15, 2018
Page 27 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
c. Monitoring Report on the Monitoring Report on the status
status of submission and of submission and transmittal
transmittal of AARs of AARs submitted to OAC-LGS
within _____ WDs after EO
month, starting March 2018
(LGS unnumbered memoranda
dated April 6, 2017 and July 31,
2017)
Outcome Indicators
Page 28 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
1. % of the number of a. Status Report on transmittal, Status Report on transmittal,
prepared audit reports publication and furnishing of publication and furnishing of
transmitted to AARs on LGUs AARs on LGUs submitted to
auditees, Congress and OAC-LGS within __ WDs after
other oversight June 30, 2018 and every month
agencies within the thereafter
deadline set by the
Commission
Page 29 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
2. Number of Reviewed Fraud/Special Audit Reviewed ___ Fraud/Special
Fraud/Special Audit Reports Complaints/Audit Audit Reports released to
Reports released to Investigations released to audited agencies or returned to
audited agencies audited agencies Special Audit Teams concerned
within the prescribed within _____ WDs from receipt
deadline
Outcome Indicators
1. Number of criminal Signed Recommendation Letter Signed Recommendation Letter
cases filed in the court to OMB for the filing of criminal to OMB for the filing of criminal
based on Fraud/ charges with Affidavit charges with Affidavit
Special Audit Reports Complaints/Sworn Narrative Complaints/Sworn Narrative
Reports of the Special Audit Reports of the Special Audit
Teams Teams submitted to OMB
within __ WDs from receipt
Page 30 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Sub-Program 5. Technical Services Sub-program
Output Indicators
1. Number of Technical a. Reviewed Technical Reviewed ___ TERs on
Evaluation Reports Evaluation Reports (TERs) on Infrastructure Projects
rendered within the Infrastructure Projects transmitted to concerned
prescribed deadline Supervising Auditors
(Sas)/Audit Team Leaders
(ATLs) within ___ WDs from
receipt
Page 31 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
3. Number of Appraisal Reviewed Appraisal Review Reviewed ___ ARRs transmitted
Reports rendered Reports (ARRs) on Properties to concerned SAs/ATLs within
within the prescribed for Disposal __ WDs from receipt
deadline
Outcome Indicator
1. % of IS/IT/IC Monitoring Report on the Monitoring Report on the
audit/evaluation audit/evaluation audit/evaluation
recommendations recommendations accepted and recommendations accepted and
accepted and implemented by the auditees implemented by the auditees
implemented by the submitted to _____ on or before
auditees _____
Page 32 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
RO's Monitoring Report on the RO's Monitoring Report on the
Enforcement and Monitoring of Enforcement and Monitoring of
Final and Executory Decisions Final and Executory Decisions
of the Audit Teams submitted to OAC-LGS on or
before the 10th day of the
following month after the end
of the semester (COA Memo
2018-003 dated March 5, 2018)
⦁ Region-wide Provincial
Matrices - on or before May
30, 2018
⦁ Region-wide City Matrices -
on or before May 30, 2018
Page 33 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
⦁ Region-wide Municipal
Matrices - on or before June
30, 2018
⦁ Region-wide Barangay
Matrices - on or before June
30, 2018
RO's Consolidated Status Report RO's Consolidated Status
of all receivables, unliquidated Report of all receivables,
cash advances and fund unliquidated cash advances and
transfers fund transfers submitted to the
OAC-LGS within _____ WDs after
the end of the semester (COA
Memo No. 2017-010 dated May
15, 2017 and LGS Unnumbered
Memorandum dated March 15,
2018)
Page 34 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
RO's consolidated audit report RO's consolidated audit report
on ODA Funded Projects on ODA Funded Projects
submitted to OAC-LGS on or
before May 11, 2018 (COA
Memo No. 2013-002 dated
April 25, 2013 and LGS
Unnumbered Memorandum
dated April 30, 2018)
Page 35 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
d. Reviewed Annex D- Region- Reviewed Annex D, printed and
wide Summary of Audit electronic copies, submitted to
Opinions on the Fairness of OAC-LGS on or before July 15,
Presentation of the Financial 2018
Statements (FS), by LGU
Classification for CY 2017AFR
for LGS
Page 36 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
h. Reviewed Annex H - Region- Reviewed Annex H, printed and
wide Summary of Common and electronic copies, submitted to
Significant Audit Observations OAC-LGS on or before July 15,
and Recommendations 2018
(CSAORs) on Barangays
Page 37 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
1. Number of pending Reviewed Decisions on appeals Reviewed _____ Decisions on
and new cases decided from ND/NC appeals from ND/NC issued by
EO June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2018
2. Number of decisions COA RO's Decisions on appeals _____ COA RO's Decisions on
of the Directors from Notices of Disallowance appeals from Notices of
affirmed by the (ND)/Notices of Charge (NC) Disallowance (ND)/Notices of
Commission Proper affirmed by the Commission Charge (NC) affirmed by the CP
Proper (CP)
Page 38 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
3. Number of final and Reviewed Notices of Finality of Reviewed _____ NFDs for all
executory cases Decision (NFDs) for all NDs/NCs that became final and
enforced NDs/NCs that became final and executory at the regional level
executory at the regional level signed and released by EO June
30, 2018 and December 31,
2018
2019 Targets
1. Number of Reviewed Decisions on appeals Reviewed _____ Decisions on
Cases/pending andnew from ND/NC appeals from ND/NC issued by
Cases decided EO June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2018
Page 39 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
2. Number of COA Reviewed Notices of Finality of Reviewed _____ NFDs for all
Orders of Execution Decision (NFDs) for all NDs/NCs that became final and
(COE) issued NDs/NCs that became final and executory at the regional level
executory at the regional level signed and released by EO June
30, 2018 and December 18,
2018
3. Number of Legal
Retainers and other
contracts reviewed
4. Number of COA
Comments/Pleadings
to Certiorari petitions
prepared
5. Number of
Affidavits/Pleadings
prepared for COA Cases
before the
Ombudsman, Court of
Appeals, Civil Service
Commission, Regional
Trial Court, etc.
Outcome Indicator
1. % of decided cases
that have been settled
Page 40 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
2. % of COA Decisions
appealed before the
Supreme Court
3. % of COA Decisions
affirmed by the
Supreme Court
2019 Targets
1. % of COA Decisions
appealed before the
Supreme Court (SC)
2. % of COA Decisions
affirmed by the SC
3. % of COEs enforced
4. % of legal retainer
and other contracts
reviewed within 30
days from receipt of
the request
Support to Operations
1. Legal assistance a. Legal Opinions rendered on ____ Legal Opinions rendered on
services requested subject matter requested subject matter
within _____ WDs from receipt of
the request
Page 41 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Page 42 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
ii. Proposed Office Order Proposed Office Order for
for assignment/ assignment/reassignment/
reassignment/designation designation of the regional
of the regional personnel personnel submitted to OAC-
LGS within 5 WDs from vacancy,
or as the need arises
Page 43 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
vii. Signed Nomination to Signed Nomination to trainings
trainings and seminars and seminars conducted by
conducted by PIDS PIDS submitted to PIDS, copy
furnished the OAC-LGS, within
the deadline set
b. Reviewed action on
logistics and other
administrative support
relative to the following:
Page 44 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
⦁ Request for 10-day or Request for 10-day or special
special monetization of monetization of leave credits
leave credits submitted to _____ within __
WDs from ___
Page 45 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Reviewed DPCR (Rated for 2nd
semester of CY 2017)
submitted to _____ on or before
_________
Page 47 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RA
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
E. Other Activities Special Assignments
Total Average:
Final Average:
Adjectival Rating:
Assistant Commissioner,
Chair, Performance Management Team LGS
Page 48 of 142
) FORM
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 49 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 50 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 51 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 52 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 53 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 54 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 55 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 56 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 57 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 58 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 59 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 60 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 61 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 62 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 63 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 64 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
2018 Targets
2018 Targets
Page 65 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
2018 Targets
Page 66 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
2018 Targets
Page 67 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
2018 Targets
2018 Targets
Page 68 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 69 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 70 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 71 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 72 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 73 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 74 of 142
RATING
Quantity Timeliness Average REMARKS
Date: ____________________
Page 75 of 142
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR) FORM
Page 76 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
d. Transmitted __% (MLs) on NGS Agencies
Management Letters (MLs) transmitted on or before
on NGS Agencies ________
Page 77 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Consolidated SASDC for Q4 Consolidated SASDC
of 2017, Q1, Q2 and Q3 of CY submitted to OAC-LGS
2018 within __ WDs after the end
of the quarter (30WDs)
Page 78 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Consolidated Report of Consolidated Report of
receivables, unliquidated receivables, unliquidated
cash advances and fund cash advances and fund
transfers transfers submitted to the
OAC-LGS within __ WDs
after the end of the
semester
Page 79 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
c. Reviewed Annex C- Reviewed Annex C, printed
Summary of Loans by LGUs and electronic copies,
for CY 2017 AFR for LGS submitted to GAS, copy
furnished the OAC-LGS, on
or before May 15, 2018
Page 80 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
g. Reviewed Annex G- Reviewed Annex G, printed
Financial Profile of and electronic copies,
Barangays by submitted to GAS on or
City/Municipality for the CY before June 30, 2018
2017 AFR for LGS
Attended/Participated in Attended/Participated in
the trainers' trainings on 100% trainers' trainings
Government Accounting on GAM for LGUs by end of
Manual (GAM) for Local 2018
Government Units
Page 81 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Attended/Participated in Attended/Participated in
the trainers' trainings on 100% trainers' trainings
the Barangay Financial on Barangay Financial
Management Manual Management Manual by
end of 2018
____ Action
rendered/referred to the
Audit Groups/Teams/
concerned offices within
______ WDs from receipt of
the request
Support to Operations
Page 82 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
a. Reviewed Comments on Reviewed comments
House and Senate Bills submitted to the House
and Senate Committee
within the requested date
of submission
Page 83 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
iv. Request for authority Request for authority for
for personal travel abroad personal travel abroad
submitted to HRMO, copy
furnished OAC-LGS within
_____ WDs from receipt of
request
Page 84 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
⦁ Inventory of filled and
unfilled positions in the
Sector
⦁ RIS/PR
⦁ SPCR
⦁ PBB Ranking
Page 85 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
E. Other Activities Special Assignments
Total Average:
Final Average:
Adjectival Rating:
Assistant Commissioner,
Chair, Performance Management Team LGS
Page 86 of 142
ORM
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 87 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 88 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 89 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 90 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 91 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 92 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 93 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 94 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 95 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 96 of 142
RATING
Timeliness Average REMARKS
Page 97 of 142
SECTORAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (SPCR) FORM
We, DIVINIA M. ALAGON, Head of the Local Government Sector, Carmelita O. Antasuda, Director IV, Sisinia H. Estorosos, Director III and Reynaldo G. Gamutan
Assistantcommit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures
Assistant Commmssioner, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period July 1, 2015 to
December 31, 2015
________________________________
DIVINIA M. ALAGON
Assistant Commissioner
Date: __________________________
Approved by:
________________________________
MICHAEL G. AGUINALDO
Chairperson
Date: __________________________
LGS- SPCR
98 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
1.1 Number of a. Monitored Reports on CY Comparative Report on
agencies subjected 2014 AARs Transmittal- AARs transmitted vis-a-vis
to financial, Provinces, Cities, ITO Report on AARs
compliance and Municipalities (PCM) Received and Published
other audits prepared on or before 20
WDs after the end of the
3rd quarter
LGS- SPCR
99 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
1.2 % of increase in a. Consolidated Status on the Report on the
the audit Implementation of PY Audit implementation (90% of
recommendations Recommendations in the CY 10% target increase of
implemented by the 2013 AARs audit recommendations
auditees fully implemented)
Illustration prepared EO December
Part III of: 2015
CY 2013 AAR: 1/17 = 6%
CY 2014 AAR: 4/18 = 22%
Increase = 16%
90% of 10% = 9%
LGS- SPCR
100 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
a. Consolidated SASDC for Consolidated SASDC
2nd and 3rd quarters of submitted to ITO on or
2015 before ___________ (deadline
set)
Consolidated RADC for 1st
semester of 2015 Consolidated RADC
submitted to ChO on or
before ________
2. Fraud Audit
2.1 No. of agencies Reviewed Evaluation 90% of 50% received ERs
subjected to fraud Reports (ERs) on submitted to FAO by EO
audit Complaints/Audit December 2015
Investigations Conducted,
received from Regional
Offices
LGS- SPCR
101 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
Percentage of a. Reviewed and Consolidated AORs CD, ACD ,
AFRS/ Annual Consolidated Common and submitted to GAS on or SAs/RSAs/ATLs/A
Reports on Significant Audit before August 15, 2015 TMs
Allotments, Observations and
Obligations and Recommendations (AORs)
Disbursement for auditees with
submitted to the transmitted AARs for CY
President and 2014 AFR
Congress
C. MFO 4: Government Accounting and Auditing Regulations and Adjudication and Other Legal Services
1. Rules and Regulations Standards Development
1.1 Number of a. Finalized Barangay Finalized Barangay
policies, Accounting Manual Accounting Manual
auditing/accountin submitted to the CP on or
g standards, rules before __________
and regulations and
guidelines issued
and developed or
updated and
disseminated
LGS- SPCR
102 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
b. Draft Revised Chart of Draft RCA submitted to
Accounts (RCA) for Local ACG on or before EO
Government November 2015
LGS- SPCR
103 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
b. Reviewed Report on Reviewed Report with
Complaints against COA recommendations
Personnel received from submitted to the Internal
Regional Directors and other Affairs Office within 15
parties WDs from receipt
b. Reviewed Action on
Personnel Matters, as
follows:
LGS- SPCR
104 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
ii. Ranking Lists of Reviewed Ranking Lists
Applications signed and returned to
for promotion of OAC within two CDs from
qualified CPA and non- receipt
CPA applicants
received from the OAC
LGS- SPCR
105 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
vi. Nominations to Nominations for the 100%
trainings/seminars/ of the Requests/
conventions to PIDS Recommendations
submitted to PIDs within
15 WDs from receipt of the
request or after the need
arises
e. Reviewed Report
generated from the following
databases maintained by the
Regions:
LGS- SPCR
106 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
ii. Database on money Reviewed Quarterly Report
claims, requests for on the Status of money
condonation, claims and other legal
requests for write-off, services utilized for
requests for COA's monitoring
concurrence in the
hiring of lawyers,
requests for opinion
and other legal
services
LGS- SPCR
107 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
f. Reviewed Action on 90% of Logistical and
Logistics and other other administrative
administrative support requirements, depending
relative to the following: on nature, provided within
the prescribed timelines
• Budget Proposals and within the resources
• QAR
• Actual MOOE
• Requests for 10-day
or special
monetization of
leave credits
• MRAU
• Monthly Report on
Number of Days of
Leaves of Absences of
RATA Recipients
• PPMP/APP
• Inventory of filled and
unfilled positions in
the plantilla
• RIS/IT Equipment
Requisition
• Obligation Requests
• PAFs
• PBB Ranking
• Office Supplies
requirements
LGS- SPCR
108 of 142
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) ACCOMPLISHMENTS BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness
Measure ACCOUNTABLE
E. Other Activities - Assistant Commissioner (Special Assignments)
a. Member, Assistant 100% of activities assigned
Commissioners' Group completed as scheduled
Total Average:
Final Average:
Adjectival Rating:
Risk Management and Budget Office Chair, Performance Management Team COA Chairperson
Rating
4.5 to 5.0 - Outstanding
3.0 to 4.4 - Very Satisfactory
2.0 to 2.9 - Satisfactory
1.0 to 1.9 - Unsatisfactory
Below 1.0 - Poor
LGS- SPCR
109 of 142
AND REVIEW (SPCR) FORM
ctor, Carmelita O. Antasuda, Director IV, Sisinia H. Estorosos, Director III and Reynaldo G. Gamutan, Director III, Office of the
the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures
the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period July 1, 2015 to
________________________________
DIVINIA M. ALAGON
Assistant Commissioner
________________________________
REYNALDO G. GAMUTAN
Director III
Date: __________________________
________________________________
MICHAEL G. AGUINALDO
Chairperson
Date: __________________________
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
110 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
Provinces - 81;
Cities - 144; Municipalities
- 1,490; SUCs and other
stand alone NGS - 116;
Water Districts and
Other Stand Alone CGS -
457
LGS- SPCR
111 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
112 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
113 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
114 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
115 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
116 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
117 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
118 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
119 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
LGS- SPCR
120 of 142
RATING
Average REMARKS
COA Chairperson
Date: ____________________
LGS- SPCR
121 of 142
SECTORAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (SPCR) FORM
I, DIVINIA M. ALAGON, Head of the Local Government Sector, Office of the Assistant Commissioner commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in ac
with the indicated measures
in accordance with the indicated measures for the period January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016
________________________________
DIVINIA M. ALAGON
Assistant Commissioner
22-Mar-16
Approved by:
________________________________
MICHAEL G. AGUINALDO
Chairperson
Date: __________________________
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Initial Evaluation ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) (RMSPS) ACCOMPLISHM BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average
Measure ENTS ACCOUNTABLE
A. MFO 1: Government Auditing Services
1. Financial, Compliance and VFM, and Other Audits
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Initial Evaluation ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) (RMSPS) ACCOMPLISHM BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average
Measure ENTS ACCOUNTABLE
1.1 Number of a. Monitored Reports on the 100% of AARs on Outputs - "Reconciled the
agencies subjected status of submission and provinces, cities and uploaded and transmitted
to financial, transmittal of CY 2015 AARs municipalities submitted 2015 AARs on provinces,
compliance and -Provinces, Cities, and transmitted end of cities and municipalities"
other audits Municipalities (PCM) June 2016 SI - "Submitted
and Transmitted CY 2015
AARs on ___provinces,
___cities and
___municipalities by eo
June 2016"
b. Monitored Reports on the 100% of AARs on SUCs and Output - "Submitted and
status of submission and other Stand-Alone NGAs Transmitted AARs on
transmittal of AARs on SUCs and Water Districts and SUCs and other Stand-
and Stand-Alone NGAs and other Stand -Alone CGAs Alone NGAs and Water
Water Districts and Other submitted and transmitted Districts and other Stand-
Stand-Alone CGAs end of June 2016 Alone CGAs"
SI - "Submitted and
Transmitted AARs on
___SUCs and ___other
Stand-Alone NGAs and
___Water Districts and
___other Stand-Alone
CGAs by eo June 2016"
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Initial Evaluation ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) (RMSPS) ACCOMPLISHM BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average
Measure ENTS ACCOUNTABLE
d. Monitoring Report on Comparative Report on CE Output - Conducted
Cash Examination (CE) conducted from January 1 monitoring on Cash
conducted EO June 2016 to June 30, 2016 vis-a-vis Examination by eo June
(Improve Outputs) Total Number of AOs 2016 vis-a-vis Aos to be
targeted to be cash cash examined" SI
examined EO June 2016 - "Conducted Comparative
Report on CE from
January to june 30, 2016
vis-a-vis ___AOs to be cash
examined by eo June
2016"
2. Fraud Audit
2.1 No. of agencies Reviewed Evaluation 100% of target (at least
subjected to fraud Reports (ERs) on one per month) ERs
audit Complaints/Audit received on or before May
Investigations Conducted, 31, 2016 either returned
received from Regional or transmitted to FAO by
Offices end of June 2016
C. MFO 4: Government Accounting and Auditing Regulations and Adjudication and Other Legal Services
• PAFs
• PBB Ranking
• Office Supplies
requirements
Total Average:
Final Average:
Adjectival Rating:
Risk Management and Budget Office Chair, Performance Management Team COA Chairperson
Date:
__________________
Date: _________________ __ Date: ____________________
MFO / PAP OUTPUTS SUCCESS INDICATORS Initial Evaluation ACTUAL ALLOTTED DIVISION/ RATING
Performance (Target + Measures) (RMSPS) ACCOMPLISHM BUDGET INDIVIDUALS Quality Quantity Timeliness Average
Measure ENTS ACCOUNTABLE
Validated by:
ELIZABETH P. ORTEGA
Supervising Admin Officer
ANNEX A
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
Chairperson