Extraction of Ephedrine From Ephedra Using of CO2, Diethylamine, and Methanol

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Selective Extraction of Ephedrine from Ephedra sinica Using

Mixtures of CO2, Diethylamine, and Methanol

Y. H. Choi I / J. Kim* / Y. C. Kim l / K.-P. Yoo 2


ICollege of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
2Department of Chemical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul 121-742, Korea

seneciphylline, thebaine, codeine, morphine, O-me-


Key Words thylcariachine, protopine, ct-allocryptopine, escolzine,
californidine, sanguinorine, and chelerythine from plant
Supercritical fluid extraction materials have been reported by previous researchers
Basified modifier [4-10]. However, in the extraction of alkaloids using
Ephedrine derivatives supercritical CO2, there are some points to be con-
Ephedra sinica sidered; it is sufficiently nonpolar as not to extract or
solubilize polar alkaloids. Moreover, most alkaloids do
not exist as free bases (freely soluble in nonpolar sol-
Summary vent) but in salt forms (insoluble in nonpolar solvent)
conjugated with several acids in plant tissues due to their
The effect of modifiers has been investigated on the SFE characteristic basicities [11]. To overcome this deffi-
efficiencies of ephedrine derivatives (e. g. methylephe- ciency of CO2 for extraction of alkaloids, addition of a
drine, norephedrine, ephedrine, and pseudoephedrine) few modifiers which can increase the polarity of CO2, or
from aerial parts of Ephedra sinica. Among the modi- other supercritical fluids such as N20 and CHF3 have
fiers employed, methanol containing 10 % (v/v) of die- been utilized [12-14]. However, several problems with
thylamine showed greater enhancement of SFE effi- these alternative methods including limitations to the
ciency for ephedrine derivatives than any other amount of added modifiers and environmental hazards
modifiers evaluated in this study. These results might be of the alternative supercritical solvents have led to the
due to the fact that the salts of Ephedra alkaloids (in- development of other SFE methods before they became
soluble in CO2) in plant tissues are changed to their free universally accepted as an extraction method for alka-
bases (freely soluble in CO2) by basified modifiers such loids.
as diethylamine in methanol. It was supported by mea-
surements of solubilities of these compounds in each In this study, we intended to extract ephedrine deriva-
supercritical solvent. In addition, CO2 modified with tives, benzylamine alkaloids, from aerial parts of Ephe-
diethylamine in methanol could more readily extract dra sinica using supercritical CO2. The aerial parts of
ephedrine than pseudoephedrine, which is the diaster- Ephedra sinica have long been used in traditional med-
comer of ephedrine. icine as a diaphoretic, anti-asthmatic and diuretic as well
as for the treatment of bronchitis and acute nephritic
edema [15]. The alkaloids isolated from E. sinica:
Ephedra alkaloids such as methylephedrine (1), nor-
ephedrine (2), ephedrine (3), pseudoephedrine (4) (Fig-
Introduction ure 1) have been used for asthma, influenza and some
types of inflammation [15]. Unfortunately, in pre-
Numerous problems of conventional organic solvent liminary tests, pure CO2 could not extract these ephe-
extraction methods, i.e., high cost, toxicity, and en- drine derivatives under any experimental conditions
vironmental hazard, have promoted the wide use of su- employed (40-80~ 13.6-34.0MPa). Therefore, to
percritical CO2 for extraction of natural products as an enhance the SFE efficiency of ephedrine derivatives, we
alternative [1-3]. Among the groups of natural pro- systematically carried out experiments as follows. (i)
ducts, alkaloids have drawn more attention as target The solubilities (pure compound extractabilities or
compounds for supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) than pseudosolubilities) of the free bases and the salts of
any other because of their diverse biological activities. ephedrine derivatives (hydrochloride salts in this study)
A number of SFE applications to the extraction of alka- were compared in order to evaluate the effect of the salt
loids including caffeine, monocrotaline, senecionine, form on SFE efficiency. (ii) Methanol and water, as

Original ChromatographiaVol. 50, No. 11/12, December 1999 673

0009-5893/99/12 673-07 $ 03.00/0 9 1999 Friedr. Vieweg& Sohn VerlagsgesellschafimbH


TableI. SFE experimental conditions for each sample.

Sample Temperature Pressure Flowrate Static time Volume


(~ (MPa) (mL min-1) (min) consumed
(mE)

Pseudoephedrinefreebase 40 and 80 13.6-34.0 1.0 15 10


Salts of ephedrine derivatives 80 34.0 1.0 15 10
Spikedfilter papers 80 34.0 1.0 15 50
Plant materials 80 and 100 34.0 1.0 15 50 and 100

CH3 CH3
orcinol, and pseudoephedrine free base were from
I w . Rt
c....
I n Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Hydro-
C ..... / '

~ - i
c \
'"~. R~
f--k_/
\ / i '- c.~
chloride salts o f methylephedrine, norephedrine,
ephedrine, and pseudoephedrine were generously
H(~ H donated by Dr B.-J. Cha (Dong-A Pharm, Co. Ltd.,
H
Anyang, Kyungki-Do, Korea).
R I=R2= CH3; Methylephedrine ( 0 Pseudoephedrine (4)

R~=R2= H; Norephedrine (2) Spiking Ephedrine Derivatives onto Filter Paper

RI=CH3, R2= H; Ephedrine (3) 1 g filter paper disks (Advantec No. 2, Toyo Roshi
Kaisha, Japan) were cut to ca. 1 cm diameter and placed
Figure 1
in the extraction vessel. Each ephedrine derivative stan-
Struc~tres ofmethylephedrine (1), norephedrine (2), ephedrine (3),
and pseudoephedrine (4). dard (0.2 mg) was spiked onto the filter paper disks.
They were then dried in vacuum oven at 40 ~ for 24
hours.

initial modifiers, were used for improving the solubi- Organic Solvent Extraction
lities of ephedrine derivative salts. (iii) Next, the solu-
bilities of the salts in non-basified modifiers such as The dried and pulverized plant materials (1.0 g) were
pure methanol or water were compared with those of extracted with 7 0 m L 0.5 M H2SO4 for 12 h [16]. The
methanol or water basified with diethylamine. (iv) For filtered extract was adjusted to pH 11-13 by addition o f
measurements of desorption of ephedrine derivatives 6 M NaOH. 16 g NaC1 was added in the extract to re-
from a matrix by these solvents employed in this paper, move the salts and extracted with 100 mL diethy| ether
the extractabilities from filter papers by the super- three times. The diethyl ether phase was evaporated to
critical solvents were investigated. (v) Based upon the dryness and the residue dissolved in 10 mL methanol.
results of solubility determination and desorption from From this, I mL methanol solution was re-evaporated
a matrix, SFE was performed for extraction of the alka- together with 50/~g orcinol as an internal standard for
loids from a plant matrix (E. sinica). GC analysis.

Supercritical Fluid Extraction


Experimental SFE was on an Isco supercritical fluid extractor, model
Plant Material SFX 3560 equipped with two Isco 260 D syringe pumps
(Lincoln, NE, U.S.A.) using CO2 (99.9 %, Seoul Gas
The aerial parts ofE. sinica were from Korea Export and Co. Seoul, Korea) and CO2 modified with 1,5 and 10 %
Import Federation of Drugs, Seoul, Korea. Their au- of methanol, water, methanol containing 10 % (v/v) of
thenticity was confirmed by Dr. D.S. Han (Emeritus diethylamine, and water containing 10 % (v/v) diethy-
Professor, College o f Pharmacy, Seoul, Korea). Plant lamine. The SFE experimental conditions are listed in
materials were dried at 40 ~ for 24 hrs and pulverized. Table I. The restrictor temperature was the same at each
extraction temperature. The remaining volume was fil-
Chemicals and Standards led with glass wool. In each extraction step, the extract
was collected in methanol.
The HPLC grade methanol and water were from
J.T. Baker Inc. (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Diethylamine GC Analysis
(99 %) and diethylether (95 %) were from Duksan
Chemical Co. (Yongin, Kyungki-Do, Korea). N-me- For measurement of the solubility of pseudoephedrine
thyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA), free base, the extracts in methanol were evaporated un-

674 Chromatographia Vol. 50, No. 11/12, December 1999 Original

0009-5893/99/12 673-07 $ 03.00/0 9 1999 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaff mbH

You might also like