Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seminar On MAFM
Seminar On MAFM
Seminar On MAFM
This process provides improvement in surface roughness and material removal rate,
polish intricate geometries. The process has found applications in a wide range of
fields such as aerospace, defence, and surgical and tool manufacturing industries.
Extrusion pressure, flow volume, grit size, number of cycles, media, and work piece
configuration are the principal machining parameters that control the surface finish
characteristics. Recently there has been a trend to create hybrid processes by
merging the AFF process with other non-conventional processes. This has opened
up new vistas for finishing difficult to machine materials with complicated shapes
which would have been otherwise impossible. These processes are emerging as
major technological infrastructure for precision, meso, micro, and nano scale
engineering. This review provides an insight into the fundamental and applied
research in the area and creates a better understanding of this finishing process,
with the objective of helping in the selection of optimum machining parameters for
the finishing of varied work pieces in practice.MAFM is a new non-conventional
machining technique .It produces surface finishes ranging from rough to extremely fine.
Here chips are formed by small cutting edges on abrasive particles.The use of magnetic
field around the work piece. It deflects the path of abrasive flow. Here ‘Microchipping’
of the surface is done.
7
2 Literature View
4 Experimental Set-Up 9
5 Process Parameters 11
6 Principle 12
7 Abrasive Medium 14
8 MAFM Machines 15
10 Advantages 19
11 Limitations 20
12 Applications 21
23
13 Summary
24
14 References
1. INTRODUCTION
G.H. RAISONI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
B-TECH MECHANICAL 3
Magneto abrasive flow machining (MAFM) is a new technique in machining. The orbital
flow machining process has been recently claimed to be another improvement over AFM,
which performs three-dimensional machining of complex components. These processes
can be classified as hybrid machining processes (HMP)—a recent concept in the
advancement of non-conventional machining. The reasons for developing a hybrid
machining process is to make use of combined or mutually enhanced advantages and to
avoid or reduce some of the adverse effects the constituent processes produce when they
are individually applied. In almost all non-conventional machining processes such as
electric discharge machining, electrochemical machining, laser beam machining, etc., low
material removal rate is considered a general problem and attempts are continuing to
develop techniques to overcome it. The present paper reports the preliminary results of an
on-going research project being conducted with the aim of exploring techniques for
improving material removal (MR) in AFM. One such technique studied uses a magnetic
field around the work piece. Magnetic fields have been successfully exploited in the past,
such as machining force in magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF), used for micro machining
and finishing of components, particularly circular tubes. The process under investigation
is the combination of AFM and MAF, and is given the name Magneto Abrasive
Flow Machining (MAFM).
Problem Definition
Extrude Hone Corporation, USA, originally developed the AFM process in 1966. Since
then, a few empirical studies have been carried out and also research work regarding
process mechanisms, modeling of surface generation and process monitoring of AFM
was conducted by Williams and Rajurkar during the late 1980s. Their work was mainly
related to online monitoring of AFM with acoustic emission and stochastic modeling of
the process. Loveless et al. and Kozak et al investigated the effect of previous machining
process on the quality of surface produced by AFM and the flow behavior of the medium
used in the process. Fletcher and others reported studies on the rheological properties and
the effect of temperature of the medium used in AFM. Przyklenk conducted parametric
studies of AFM. Research work concerning mathematical modeling, simulation of
material removal and surface generation with the help of finite element and neural
networks was presented by different researchers. Steif and Haan suggested the presence
of ‘dispersive stresses’, which enable wear of the surface during abrasive flow
processing. The dispersive stresses are generated because of the difference between
stresses acting on abrasive particles and those acting in the surrounding medium. Jones
and Hull reported the modification of existing AFM by applying ultrasonic waves in the
medium for machining blind cavities. The orbital flow machining process suggested by
Gilmore has been recently claimed to be another improvement over AFM, which
performs three-dimensional machining of complex components. These processes can be
classified as hybrid machining processes (HMP)—a recent concept in the advancement of
non-conventional machining. The reasons for developing a hybrid machining process is
to make use of combined or mutually enhanced advantages and to avoid or reduce some
of the adverse effects the constituent processes produce when they are individually
applied. Rajurkar and Kozak have described around 15 various processes under this
category.
This report discusses the possible improvement in surface roughness and material
removal rate by applying a magnetic field around the work piece in AFM. A set-up has
Method
2. LITERATURE VIEW
AFM was developed in 1960s as a method to deburr, machining. This provides
improvement in surface roughness and material removal rate, polish intricate geometries.
3. NON-TRADITIONAL MACHINING
4. EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP
MAFM set - up.
The Fixture.
The work fixture was made of nylon, a non-magnetic material. It was specially designed
to accommodate electromagnet poles such that the maximum magnetic pull occurs near
the inner surface of the work piece.
The Electromagnet.
5. PROCESS PARAMETERS
6. PRINCIPLE
(a) (b)
Figure 2: (a) Off-state MR fluid particles (b) Aligning in an applied magnetic field.
Figure 7: Orbital MAFM Process (a) Before start of finishing (b) While finishing.
Automotive
The demand for this process is increasing among car and two wheeler manufacturers as it
is capable to make the surfaces smoother for improved air flow and better performance of
high-speed automotive engines. MAFM process is capable to finish automotive and
medical parts, and turbine engine components. Internal passages within a turbine engine
diffuser are polished to increase air flow to the combustion chamber of the engine. The
rough, power robbing cast surfaces are improved from 80-90% regardless of surface
complexities.
Since in the MAFM process, abrading medium conforms to the passage geometry,
complex shapes can be finished with ease. Dies are ideal workpieces for the MAFM
process as they provide the restriction for medium flow, typically eliminating fixturing
requirements. The uniformity of stock removal by MAFM permits accurate ‘sizing’ of
undersized precision die passages.
The original 2 micron ∑Rs (EDM Finish) is improved to 0.2 micron with a stock removal
of (EDM recast layer) 0.025 mm per surface.
Figure 9: Surface finish improvement before and after on (a) internal passages within
turbine engine diffuser (b) medical implants (c) complete automotive engine parts.
2. L.J Rhoades, Kohut T.A, Nokovich N.P, Unidirectional abrasive flow machining,
US patent number 5, 367, 833, Nov 29th,1994.
3. Gorana V.K, Lal G.K, “Forces prediction during material deformation in magneto
abrasive flow machining”, Journal of manufacturing systems, Issue number 260
(2006),128-139.
4. V.K Jain, R.K Jain, “Modeling of material removal and surface roughness in
magneto abrasive flow machining process”, International Journal of Machine tool &
manufacture, Issue number 39 (1999), 1903-1923.
6. Petri K.L, Bidanda B, “A neural network process model for magneto abrasive flow
machining operations, Journal of manufacturing systems, Issue number 17 (1998),
52-64.
7. J S, Jain V.K, “Design and development of the magneto rheological abrasive flow
finishing process”, International Journal of machine tool & manufacture, Issue
number 44 (2004), 1019-1029.
8. http://www.tnmsc.cn
9. http://www.google.com.in