BUILDING CHECK TEMPLATE+baseframe

TOWER ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Site Name : #REF!

Analysis Option : #REF!
Tower Data
Tower Height : #REF! m
Antenna Loading
Antenna Type Quantity Dimension (m) Elevation (m)
Existing
Design Output Summary

Maximum Stress Ratio (Basic Wind Speed 120 kph)
Description Output Comparison
Main Leg 0.000 <

Bracing 0.000 <
Redundant 0.000 <
Plane Bracing 0.000 <
Horizontal 0.000 <
Twist, Sway & Displacement (Basic Wind Speed 80.64 kph)
Twist (degree) 0.00 <
Maximum Sway (degree) 0.00 <
Maximum Displacement (mm) : Max. H/200 0.00 #REF!
Max Tension
Fx (kN) Fy (kN) Fz (kN)
Maximum Support Reaction
#N/A #N/A 0.000
Conclusion :
According to the analysis results the stress ratio, twist, sway and displacement of existing pole are e
ER ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Tower Data
Base Level : #REF! m
Antenna Loading
Direction (degree) Remark

tress Ratio (Basic Wind Speed 120 kph)
Limitation Remark
1 OK
1 OK
1 OK
1 OK
1 OK
Displacement (Basic Wind Speed 80.64 kph)
1.00 OK
1.00 OK
#REF! #REF!
Max Compress
#N/A #N/A 0.000
sway and displacement of existing pole are enough to support existing load.
Analyzed & Validated by :

PT. SARMAG KONSULTAN NUSANTARA
TOWER ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Site Name : #REF!

Analysis Option : #REF!
Tower Data
Tower Height : #REF! m
Antenna Loading
Antenna Type Quantity Dimension (m) Elevation (m)
Existing
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
#REF! 3 #REF! #REF!
Proposed RF #REF! #REF! #REF!
1st Sector
3BAND 1 2.459x0.354x0.210 10
RRUNSN 4 0.550x0.550.0.150
FILTER 2 0.450x0.250x0.165
JBOX 1 0.300x0.250x0.100
2nd Sector
3BAND 1 2.459x0.354x0.210 10
RRUNSN 4 0.550x0.550.0.150
FILTER 2 0.450x0.250x0.165
JBOX 1 0.300x0.250x0.100
3rd Sector
3BAND 1 2.459x0.354x0.210 10
RRUNSN 4 0.550x0.550.0.150
FILTER 2 0.450x0.250x0.165
JBOX 1 0.300x0.250x0.100
4rd Sector
3BAND 1 2.459x0.354x0.210 10
RRUNSN 4 0.550x0.550.0.150
FILTER 2 0.450x0.250x0.165
JBOX 1 0.300x0.250x0.100

Maximum Stress Ratio (Basic Wind Speed 120 kph)
Description Output Comparison
Main Leg 0.000 <

Bracing 0.000 <
Redundant 0.000 <
Plane Bracing 0.000 <
Horizontal 0.000 <
Twist, Sway & Displacement (Basic Wind Speed 80.64 kph)
Twist (degree) 0.0000 <
Maximum Sway (degree) 0.0000 <
Maximum Displacement (mm) : Max. H/100 0.0000 #REF!
Max Tension
Maximum Support Reaction
#N/A #N/A 0.000
Conclusion :
According to the analysis results the stress ratio, twist, sway and displacement of strengthen pole are enough t
ER ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Tower Data
Base Level : #REF! m
Antenna Loading
Direction (degree) Remark
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
70/215/350
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
30
135/315
135/315
45
120
225/45
225/45
135
210
315/135
315/135
225
160
45/225
45/225
45

tress Ratio (Basic Wind Speed 120 kph)
Limitation Remark
1 OK
1 OK
1 OK
1 OK
1 OK
Displacement (Basic Wind Speed 80.64 kph)
1.00 OK
1.00 OK
#REF! #REF!
Max Compress
#N/A #N/A 0.000
and displacement of strengthen pole are enough to support proposed load.

SUPPORT BRACING ANALYSIS
Site Name : #REF! Prepared By : Sarmag Consultant

Site ID : #REF! Date : 17-Dec-19
INPUT DATA
Sectional Dimension S = DAE 60x60x6

Sec. of Area A = 13.82 cm2
Bracing Length L = 180.6 cm
Radius of Gyration (min) r min = 1.82 cm
Tensile Yield Strength fy = 240 MPa
Tensile Ultimate Strength fu = 370 MPa
Yield Reduction Factor, Øy = 0.8
Ultimate Reduction Factor, Øu = 0.75
Compression Reduction Factor, Øc = 0.85
Connection Reduction Factor, U = 0.75
Ultimate Design Tension, Tu = 56.044 kN
Ultimate Design Compression, Nu = 58.683 kN
Ultimate Design Moment, Mu = 0.953 kNm
TENSION ANALYSIS
Slenderness Ratio λ = 99.230769

λ < 240 OK L
Tensile Yield Resistance Øy.Tn = 265.344 kN
  240
rmin
Tensile Ultimate Resistance Øu.Tn = 287.629 kN
Tensile Resistance Tn = 265.344 kN  y .Tn   y . f y A
Tensile Ultimate Tu = 56.044 kN
Tensile Ratio = 0.211 OK  u .T n   u . f u Ae 
COMPRESSION ANALYSIS  fy
c 
 E
Compression Slenderness Ratio λc = 1.094
ω = 1.650  c  0, 25    1
Compression Resistance Nn = 170.912 kN
Compression Ultimate Nu = 58.683 kN 0, 25   c  1, 2   
Compression Ratio = 0.343 OK
 c  1, 2    1, 25  c
fy
N n   c . A. f cr  A.

MOMENT ANALYSIS
Sec. of Plastic Modulus Z = 10.716 cm3

Moment Resistance Mn = 2.572 kN.m
Moment Ultimate Mu = 0.953 kN.m
Moment Ratio = 0.371 OK
CONCLUSION
BRACING STATUS → NO NEED STRENGTHENING

L
  240
rmin
 y .T n   y . f y A
 u .T n   u . f u Ae   u . f u .U . A
 fy
c 
 E
 c  0, 25    1
1, 43
0, 25   c  1, 2   
1,6  0 .67  c
 c  1, 2    1, 25  c
2
fy
N n   c . A. f cr  A.

COUNTERWEIGHT OF POLE
Project : -
Client : PT. TOWER BERSAMA GROUP
A. LOAD CASE
Maximum Force in Main Pole :
Vertical Force - Tu (kN) = -46.80
Lateral Force - Vux (kN) = 0.90 Legend :
Lateral Force - Vuy (kN) = 0.37 Overturning Line
Maximum Force in Support 1 : Centroid of Counterweight
Vertical Force - Tu (kN) = 42.86
Lateral Force - Vux (kN) = -12.75
Lateral Force - Vuy (kN) = -0.02
Maximum Force in Support 2 :
Vertical Force - Tu (kN) = 24.63
Lateral Force - Vux (kN) = 0.00
A
E8
Lateral Force - Vuy (kN) = -7.32
500
B. POLE
X C
Properties of Pole :
Height of Pole - H (m) = 9
Center to Center Distance between
Main Pole to Support Pole 1 - A2 (m) = 2.5
Center to Center Distance between

Main Pole to Support Pole 2 - B2 (m) = 2.5
C. COUNTERWEIGHT
500
Properties of Counterweight :
Distance from Edge of Counterweight to
Center of Support 1 - A1 (m) = 0.25
Distance from Edge of Counterweight to

Center of Main Pole - A3 (m) = 0.25
Width of Counterweight - D (m) = 0.5
Depth of Counterweight - T (m) = 0.5
Center of Gravity Distance - CGx (m) = 0.93
Center of Gravity Distance - CGy (m) = 0.93
Specific Gravity of Concrete - Gc (kg/m3) = 2400
Weight of Counterweight - W (kN) = 32.35
D. CHECK FOR OVERTURNING

Overturning Moment to Line A - A
Distance of E1 (m) = 2.47 Overturning Moment - MOA-A (kN-m)
Page 13 - 63
COUNTERWEIGHT OF POLE
Project : -
Distance of E2 (m) = 1.51 Resisting Moment - MRA-A (kN-m)

Distance of E3 (m) = 0.35 Safety Factor - SF
Result
Overturning Moment to Line B - B
Distance of E6 (m) = 0.25 Overturning Moment - MOB-B (kN-m)
Distance of E7 (m) = 2.75 Resisting Moment - MRB-B (kN-m)
Result
Overturning Moment to Line C - C
Distance of E4 (m) = 0.25 Overturning Moment - MOC-C (kN-m)
Distance of E5 (m) = 2.75 Resisting Moment - MRC-C (kN-m)
Result
Conclusion :
According to the analysis results the resisting moment of existing counterweight are enough to support
proposed load.
Page 14 - 63
NTERWEIGHT OF POLE
Site Name : #REF!
Site ID : #REF!
A Y
B
250
Overturning Line
Centroid of Counterweight
E2
2500
E1
E5
E3
250
E4
C
E6
E7
3000
B
3000
Overturning Moment - MOA-A (kN-m) = 63.47
Page 15 - 63
NTERWEIGHT OF POLE
Site Name : #REF!
Site ID : #REF!
Resisting Moment - MRA-A (kN-m) = 446.98 A Y
Safety Factor - SF = 1.5

Result = 7.04 > 1.5 ..... OK
Overturning Moment - MOB-B (kN-m) = 106.41

Resisting Moment - MRB-B (kN-m) = 428.25
Result = 4.02 > 1.5 ..... OK
Overturning Moment - MOC-C (kN-m) = 63.25

Resisting Moment - MRC-C (kN-m) = 428.25
Result = 6.77 > 1.5 ..... OK
4.02
counterweight are enough to support Analyzed & Validated by :

Page 16 - 63
ANCHOR BOLT AND BASE PLATE ANALYSIS (LEG)
Project : COLO 2018 BATCH 2
Client : TOWER BERSAMA GROUP
A. LOAD CASE D. STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR B

Maximum Force in Column : Option 1
Uplift Force - Tu (kN) = 15.97 Add. Counterweight
Shear Force - Vu (kN) = 4.61 V (m3) = N/A
Moment - M (kN-m) = 2.68 W (kN) = N/A
SF = N/A
B. ANCHOR BOLT E. STRENGTHENING - BASE PLAT

Properties of Anchor Bolts : Option 1
Num. of Anchor Bolt - n = 4 Add. Counterweight
Dia. of Anchor Bolt - d (mm) = 16 V (m3) = N/A
Area of Anchor Bolt - A (mm2) = 200.96 W (kN) = N/A
Grade of Anchor Bolt = ASTM A307 SF = N/A
Minimum Yield Stress - Fy (MPa) = 250
Tensile Strength - Fu (MPa) = 400 F. CONDITION AFTER STRENG
Shear Strength - Fv (MPa) = 71.4 Check for Tensile Stren
Check for Interaction Ratio of Tension and Shear :

Formula :
G. CONDITION AFTER STREN
Check for Thickness
where : η - Values
Pu (kN) = Tu
φ = 0.80
Vu (kN) = 4.61
η = 0.55
Rnt (kN) = Fu An
An (mm2) = π r2 (assume An = Ag)
201.06
thus :
η = 0.90 η = 0.70
0.09 < 1 ……………. OK
Check for Tensile Strength :

Formula :
Page 17 - 63
φtRn = φtFuAg > T

where :
φt = 0.80
Ag (mm2) = A
= 201.06
T (kN) = 3.99
thus :
φtRn (kN) = 64.34 > T ……………. OK
C. BASE PLATE AND PEDESTAL

Properties of Base Plate : Type : A
Width of Base Plate - B (mm) = 300
Depth of Base Plate - D (mm) = 300 K-100
Thickness of Base Plate - T (mm) = 16 K-125
Thickness of Stiffener - t (mm) = 10 K-175
Edge of Base Plate to Center of Bolt - B1 (mm) = 150 K-225
Edge of Base Plate to Center of Bolt - D1 (mm) = 150 K-275
Center to Center of Bolt - B2 (mm) =0 K-300
Center to Center of Bolt - D2 (mm) =0
Center of Bolt to Edge of Stiffener - S1 (mm) = 90
Edge of Base Plate to Edge of Stiff. - S2 (mm) = 240
Edge of Base Plate to Edge of Leg - m (mm) = 250
Grade of Base Plate = ASTM A36
Minimum Yield Stress - Fy (MPa) = 220 Type A
Tensile Strength - Fu (MPa) = 400
Page 18 - 63
Properties of Pedestal :
Widht of Pedestal - Bw (mm) = 330
Grade of Concrete = K-225
f'c (MPa) = 18.31
Check for Bearing Capacity :
Formula :
where :
ϕc = resistance factor for bearing on concrete = 0.60
A1 (mm2) = area of base plate = 90000.00
A2 (mm2) = area of supporting base plate, geometrically similar = 90000.00
thus :
ϕ Pp (MPa) = 840608.88 < 1.7f'c A1 ……………. OK
ϕ 1.7f'c A1 (MPa)
= 1681217.75
Check for Thickness Requirement :

Formula :
where :
T (kN) = factored externally applied tension per bolt = 3.99
b' (mm) = S1 - d/2 = 82
ϕb = reduction factor = 0.90
w (mm) = width of resisting section tributary to one bolt = 240
Fu (MPa) = Tensile Strength of base plate = 400
α' = 1.0 if β ≥ 1
= the lesser of 1 and if β < 1 δ= (w - d)/w

= 0.9333333333
β = B (kN) = φt Rn ρ= b'/a'
= 0.58
= 26.17
α' = 1.00
Page 19 - 63
thus :
tfreq. (mm) = 2.8
tfext. (mm) = 16
tf required < tf existing ……………. OK
Page 20 - 63
AND BASE PLATE ANALYSIS (LEG)
Site Name : KEMIRI
Site ID : 20604109
D. STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR BOLT Strengthening Used

Option 2 N/A
Add. Anchor Bolt
Num. Bolt - n = N/A Option Used
D (mm) = N/A
N/A
E. STRENGTHENING - BASE PLATE

Option 2
Add. Anchor Bolt
Num. Bolt - n = N/A
D (mm) = N/A
F. CONDITION AFTER STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR BOLT

Check for Tensile Strength of Anchor Bolt :
φtRn (kN) = N/A Check :
T (kN) = N/A N/A
G. CONDITION AFTER STRENGTHENING - BASE PLATE

Check for Thickness of Base Plate :
tfrequired (mm) = N/A Check :
tfexisting (mm) = N/A N/A
η = 0.55 η = 0.50
Page 21 - 63
Site Name : KEMIRI
Site ID : 20604109
(Eq. 1.2)
8.14
10.17
14.24
18.31
22.38
24.42
Type A Type B
Page 22 - 63
Site Name : KEMIRI
Site ID : 20604109
(Eq. 1.3)
(Eq. 1.4)
= -1.11
a' (mm) = D1 - d/2

= 142
Page 23 - 63
ANCHOR BOLT AND BASE PLATE ANALYSIS (BRACING

SF = N/A


Formula :
Check for Thickness
where : η - Values
Pu (kN) = Tu
φ = 0.80
Vu (kN) = 13.08
η = 0.55
Rnt (kN) = Fu An
113.10
thus :
η = 0.90 η = 0.70
0.30 < 1 ……………. OK

Formula :
Page 24 - 63
φtRn = φtFuAg > T

where :
φt = 0.80
Ag (mm2) = A
= 113.10
T (kN) = 4.96
thus :
φtRn (kN) = 36.19 > T ……………. OK

Width of Base Plate - B (mm) = 200 S2
D1
Thickness of Stiffener - t (mm) =8 K-175
D2
D
Center to Center of Bolt - B2 (mm) = 160 K-300
Center to Center of Bolt - D2 (mm) = 160
D1
Edge of Base Plate to Edge of Stiff. - S2 (mm) = 100 B1
Page 25 - 63
f'c (MPa) = 18.31
Formula :
where :
thus :
ϕ Pp (MPa) = 373603.95 < 1.7f'c A1 ……………. OK
ϕ 1.7f'c A1 (MPa)
= 747207.89

Formula :
where :
b' (mm) = S1 - d/2 = 74
α' = 1.0 if β ≥ 1

= 0.88
= 5.29
= 1.19
α' = 1.00
Page 26 - 63
thus :
tfreq. (mm) = 4.7
tfext. (mm) = 12
Page 27 - 63
D BASE PLATE ANALYSIS (BRACING)
Site Name : KEMIRI
Site ID : 20604109

Option 2 N/A
Add. Anchor Bolt
D (mm) = N/A
N/A

Option 2
Add. Anchor Bolt
Num. Bolt - n = N/A
D (mm) = N/A

T (kN) = N/A N/A

η = 0.55 η = 0.50
Page 28 - 63
Site Name : KEMIRI
Site ID : 20604109
(Eq. 1.2)
m
S2 S2 t
8.14
D1
D1
10.17
14.24 D2
18.31
D2
22.38
D
D2
24.42
S1
S1
D1
D1
B1 B2 B1 B1 B2 B2 B1
B B
Type A Type B
Page 29 - 63
Site Name : KEMIRI
Site ID : 20604109
(Eq. 1.3)
(Eq. 1.4)
= -7.08
a' (mm) = D1 - d/2

= 14
Page 30 - 63
Project : -

SF = N/A


Formula :
Check for Thickness
where : η - Values
Pu (kN) = Tu
φ = 0.80
Vu (kN) = 2.68
η = 0.55
Rnt (kN) = Fu An
201.06
thus :
η = 0.90 η = 0.70
0.22 < 1 ……………. OK

Formula :
Page 31 - 63
Project : -
φtRn = φtFuAg > T

where :
φt = 0.80
Ag (mm2) = A
= 201.06
T (kN) = 12.84
thus :
φtRn (kN) = 64.34 > T ……………. OK

Width of Base Plate - B (mm) = 300
Thickness of Stiffener - t (mm) = 10 K-175
Edge of Base Plate to Edge of Stiff. - S2 (mm) = 150
Page 32 - 63
Project : -
f'c (MPa) = 18.31
Formula :
where :
thus :
ϕ Pp (MPa) = 840608.88 < 1.7f'c A1 ……………. OK
ϕ 1.7f'c A1 (MPa)
= 1681217.75

Formula :
where :
b' (mm) = S1 - d/2 = 92
α' = 1.0 if β ≥ 1

= 0.8933333333
= 2.19
= 1.83
α' = 1.00
Page 33 - 63
Project : -
thus :
tfreq. (mm) = 6.8
tfext. (mm) = 16
Page 34 - 63
Site Name : #REF!
Site ID : #REF!

Option 2 N/A
Add. Anchor Bolt
D (mm) = N/A
N/A

Option 2
Add. Anchor Bolt
Num. Bolt - n = N/A
D (mm) = N/A

T (kN) = N/A N/A

η = 0.55 η = 0.50
Page 35 - 63
Site Name : #REF!
Site ID : #REF!
(Eq. 1.2)
8.14
10.17
14.24
18.31
22.38
24.42
Type A Type B
Page 36 - 63
Site Name : #REF!
Site ID : #REF!
(Eq. 1.3)
(Eq. 1.4)
= -2.46
a' (mm) = D1 - d/2

= 42
Page 37 - 63
Project : -

SF = N/A


Formula :
Check for Thickness
where : η - Values
Pu (kN) = Tu
φ = 0.80
Vu (kN) = 0.01
η = 0.55
Rnt (kN) = Fu An
113.10
thus :
η = 0.90 η = 0.70
0.33 < 1 ……………. OK

Formula :
Page 38 - 63
Project : -
φtRn = φtFuAg > T

where :
φt = 0.80
Ag (mm2) = A
= 113.10
T (kN) = 11.86
thus :
φtRn (kN) = 36.19 > T ……………. OK

Width of Base Plate - B (mm) = 200 S2
D1
Thickness of Stiffener - t (mm) =8 K-175
D2
D
D1
Edge of Base Plate to Edge of Stiff. - S2 (mm) = 100 B1
Page 39 - 63
Project : -
f'c (MPa) = 18.31
Formula :
where :
thus :
ϕ Pp (MPa) = 373603.95 < 1.7f'c A1 ……………. OK
ϕ 1.7f'c A1 (MPa)
= 747207.89

Formula :
where :
b' (mm) = S1 - d/2 = 64
α' = 1.0 if β ≥ 1

= 0.88
= 2.67
= 0.77
α' = 3.79
Page 40 - 63
Project : -
thus :
tfreq. (mm) = 4.4
tfext. (mm) = 16
Page 41 - 63
Site Name : #REF!
Site ID : #REF!

Option 2 N/A
Add. Anchor Bolt
D (mm) = N/A
N/A

Option 2
Add. Anchor Bolt
Num. Bolt - n = N/A
D (mm) = N/A

T (kN) = N/A N/A

η = 0.55 η = 0.50
Page 42 - 63
Site Name : #REF!
Site ID : #REF!
(Eq. 1.2)
m
S2 S2 t
8.14
D1
D1
10.17
14.24 D2
18.31
D2
22.38
D
D2
24.42
S1
S1
D1
D1
B1 B2 B1 B1 B2 B2 B1
B B
Type A Type B
Page 43 - 63
Site Name : #REF!
Site ID : #REF!
(Eq. 1.3)
(Eq. 1.4)
= 3.79
a' (mm) = D1 - d/2

= 24
Page 44 - 63
BUILDING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Site Name : KEMIRI

Analysis Option : PROPOSE CONDITION
Building Data
Tower Height : 16.5 m Building He
Structure Part Dimension (mm) Output Comparison
Baseframe HB 200 x 200 x 8 x 12 0.17 <
BEAM 250 x 400 0.742 <

COLUMN 280 x 300 0.956 <
SLAB 100 0.893 <
Conclusion :
According to the building analysis results the strength ratio of existing building are less than limitation then bui
ING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Building Data
Building Height : m
Limitation Remark
1
1 Min Reinforcement
1 Min Reinforcement
1 Min Reinforcement
of existing building are less than limitation then building strong enough to support load.

RECTANGULAR CONCRETE BEAM INVESTIGATION
B 500 x 600
Site Name : KEMIRI Prepared By : Sarmag Consultant
Site ID : 20604109 Date : 17-Dec-19
INPUT DATA
b
Beam Width, b = 500 mm
Total Depth Beam, h = 600 mm
Efective Depth, d = 550 mm
Reinforcement Diameter, D = 13 mm
Concrete Comp. Strength, fc' = 8.30 MPa d h
Reinforcing Yield Strength, fy = 390 MPa
Ultimate Design Shear, Vu = 35.27 kN
Moment Reduction Factor, Ø = 0.8
Shear Reduction Factor, Øv = 0.75
FLEXURAL ANALYSIS
 H  0
C  T
0 . 85 fc ' b . a  As . fy
0 . 85 fc ' b . a   bd . fy
 fy 
a   b   d
 0 . 85 fc ' 
Mn  As . fy  d  a / 2 
1,4
 min 
fy
Minimum Reinforcement Ratio, ρmin = 0.0036

Minimum Reinforcement Area, As min = 987.18 mm2
7 - D 13
Reinforcement Area, As = 929.13 mm2
a = 102.72 mm
Resistance Moment, Mn = 180686029.8 N.mm
Mn = 180.69 kN.m
ØMn = 144.55 kN.m
Mu = 59.72 kN.m
Mu < ØMn = OK
ratio = 0.413
SHEAR ANALYSIS
Nominal Design Shear, Vn = 132044.553 N Vn  Vu

ØVn = 132.045 kN
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Ultimate Design Shear, Vu = 35.27 kN Vn   b.d
 6 
ØVn > Vu = OK  
CONCLUSION
Flexural ReinforcemeOK
Shear ReinforcementOK
BEAM STATUS → NO NEED STRENGTHENING

h
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
B 250 x 400
Site ID : 20604109 Date : 17-Dec-19
INPUT DATA
b
FLEXURAL ANALYSIS
 H  0
C  T
0 . 85 fc ' b . a  As . fy
0 . 85 fc ' b . a   bd . fy
 fy 
a   b   d
 0 . 85 fc ' 
Mn  As . fy  d  a / 2 
1,4
 min 
fy

5 - D 13
a = 146.75 mm
Mn = 71.60 kN.m
ØMn = 57.28 kN.m
Mu = 42.49 kN.m
Mu < ØMn = OK
ratio = 0.742
SHEAR ANALYSIS

ØVn = 42.014 kN
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Ultimate Design Shear, Vu = 35.45 kN Vn   b.d
 6 
ØVn > Vu = OK  
CONCLUSION
Shear ReinforcementOK

h
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
B 150 x 300
Site Name : #REF! Prepared By : Sarmag Consultant
Site ID : #REF! Date : 17-Dec-19
INPUT DATA
b
Ultimate Design Moment, Mu = 0 kNm
Ultimate Design Shear, Vu = #N/A kN
FLEXURAL ANALYSIS
 H  0
C  T
0 . 85 fc ' b . a  As . fy
0 . 85 fc ' b . a   bd . fy
 fy 
a   b   d
 0 . 85 fc ' 
Mn  As . fy  d  a / 2 
1,4
 min 
fy

2 - D 13
a = 67.47 mm
Mn = 22.39 kN.m
ØMn = 17.91 kN.m
Mu = 0.00 kN.m
Mu < ØMn = OK
ratio = 0.000
SHEAR ANALYSIS

ØVn = 21.682 kN
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Ultimate Design Shear, Vu = #N/A kN Vn   b.d
 6 
ØVn #N/A Vu = #N/A  
CONCLUSION
Shear Reinforcement #N/A

h
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
Vn  Vu
 fc' 
Vn   b.d
 6 
 
CONCRETE SLAB INVESTIGATION
Site Name : KEMIRI Prepared By :

Site ID : 20604109 Date :
INPUT DATA
Slab Width, b = 1000 mm

Total Depth Slab, h = 100 mm
Reinforcement Diameter, D = 13 mm d
Concrete Comp. Strength, fc' = 23.2 MPa
FLEXURAL ANALYSIS
 H  0
C  T
0 . 85 fc ' b . a  As .
0 . 85 fc ' b . a   bd
 fy 
a   b  
 0 . 85 fc ' 
Mn  As . fy  d 
1,4
 min 
fy

4 - D 13
a = 6.45 mm
Mn = 7.87 kN.m
ØMn = 6.30 kN.m
Ultimate Moment, Mu = 5.62 kN.m
Mu < ØMn = OK
ratio = 0.893
CONCLUSION
SLAB STATUS → NO NEED STRENGTHENING
NCRETE SLAB INVESTIGATION
Sarmag Consultant
17-Dec-19
 H  0
C  T
0 . 85 fc ' b . a  As . fy
0 . 85 fc ' b . a   bd . fy
 fy 
a   b   d
 0 . 85 fc ' 
Mn  As . fy  d  a / 2 
1,4
 min 
fy
or D 13 - 250
STEEL BASEFRAME INVESTIGATION
HB 200 x 200 x 8 x 12
Site ID : 20604109 Date : 17-Dec-19
INPUT DATA
Depth, d = 200 mm
Width, bf = 200 mm
Thickness, tw = 8 mm
Thickness, t = 12 mm
Resistance Moment, ØMn = 101.754 kNm
Resistance Shear, ØVn = 207.36 kN
Mu < ØMn = OK
ratio = 0.17
Cek Baseframe, = OK

BUILDING CHECK TEMPLATE+baseframe

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

BUILDING CHECK TEMPLATE+baseframe

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TOWER ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Site Name : #REF!

Design Output Summary

Description Output Comparison

Main Leg 0.000 <

Design Output Summary

Analyzed & Validated by :

Site Name : #REF!

Design Output Summary

Description Output Comparison

Main Leg 0.000 <

Design Output Summary

and displacement of strengthen pole are enough to support proposed load.

Analyzed & Validated by :

Site Name : #REF! Prepared By : Sarmag Consultant

Sectional Dimension S = DAE 60x60x6

Slenderness Ratio λ = 99.230769

Sec. of Plastic Modulus Z = 10.716 cm3

BRACING STATUS → NO NEED STRENGTHENING

Center to Center Distance between

Distance from Edge of Counterweight to

D. CHECK FOR OVERTURNING

Distance of E2 (m) = 1.51 Resisting Moment - MRA-A (kN-m)

Overturning Moment - MOA-A (kN-m) = 63.47

Resisting Moment - MRA-A (kN-m) = 446.98 A Y

Safety Factor - SF = 1.5

Overturning Moment - MOB-B (kN-m) = 106.41

Overturning Moment - MOC-C (kN-m) = 63.25

counterweight are enough to support Analyzed & Validated by :

A. LOAD CASE D. STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR B

B. ANCHOR BOLT E. STRENGTHENING - BASE PLAT

Check for Interaction Ratio of Tension and Shear :

Check for Tensile Strength :

φtRn = φtFuAg > T

C. BASE PLATE AND PEDESTAL

Check for Thickness Requirement :

= the lesser of 1 and if β < 1 δ= (w - d)/w

D. STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR BOLT Strengthening Used

E. STRENGTHENING - BASE PLATE

F. CONDITION AFTER STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR BOLT

G. CONDITION AFTER STRENGTHENING - BASE PLATE

a' (mm) = D1 - d/2

A. LOAD CASE D. STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR B

B. ANCHOR BOLT E. STRENGTHENING - BASE PLAT

Check for Interaction Ratio of Tension and Shear :

Check for Tensile Strength :

φtRn = φtFuAg > T

C. BASE PLATE AND PEDESTAL

Check for Thickness Requirement :

= the lesser of 1 and if β < 1 δ= (w - d)/w

D. STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR BOLT Strengthening Used

E. STRENGTHENING - BASE PLATE

F. CONDITION AFTER STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR BOLT

G. CONDITION AFTER STRENGTHENING - BASE PLATE

a' (mm) = D1 - d/2

A. LOAD CASE D. STRENGTHENING - ANCHOR B

B. ANCHOR BOLT E. STRENGTHENING - BASE PLAT

Check for Interaction Ratio of Tension and Shear :

Check for Tensile Strength :

φtRn = φtFuAg > T

C. BASE PLATE AND PEDESTAL

Check for Thickness Requirement :

= the lesser of 1 and if β < 1 δ= (w - d)/w