Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contiguity Theory
Contiguity Theory
Contiguity Theory
Contiguity theory suggests that forgetting is due to interference rather than the
passage of time; stimuli become associated with new responses. Previous
conditioning can also be changed by being associated with inhibiting responses
such as fear or fatigue. The role of motivation is to create a state of arousal and
activity which produces responses that can be conditioned.
Application
Example
The classic experimental paradigm for Contiguity theory is cats learning to escape
from a puzzle box (Guthrie & Horton, 1946). Guthrie used a glass paneled box that
allowed him to photograph the exact movements of cats. These photographs
showed that cats learned to repeat the same sequence of movements associated
with the preceding escape from the box. Improvement comes about because
irrelevant movements are unlearned or not included in successive associations.
Later, Guthrie (1959) revised the Law of Contiguity to state, "What is being
noticed becomes a signal for what is being done."
Learnt movements are minute responses made by the muscles and are based on
stimulus response associations
Basic Principles
1. One Trial Learning. Guthrie (1942) rejected the law of frequency, saying "a
stimulus pattern gains its full associative strength on the occasion of its first
pairing with a response."
2. The Recency Principle. The last action done in the presence of a set of stimuli
will tend to be done again if the same circumstances are repeated.
**The time relation between the substitute stimulus and the response is the
important factor.
When similar circumstances are presented, the more recent response will prevail.
The stimulus-reponse connections tend to grow weaker with longer time intervals
3. Incompatible Response Method. the stimuli for the undesired response are
presented along with other stimuli that produce a response incompatible with the
undesired response.