Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ChessZone Magazine ENG, 2 (2008)
ChessZone Magazine ENG, 2 (2008)
org
Table of contents:
# 2, 2008
Our supporters:............................................................................................................ 3
News............................................................................................................................ 4
Games ....................................................................................................................... 10
(01) Gashimov,Vugar (2665) - Tiviakov,Sergei (2649) [B01].................................. 10
(02) Almasi,Z (2691) - Navara,D (2656) [C92] ....................................................... 11
(03) Berg,Emanuel (2583) - Szabo,Krisztian (2500) [B96] ..................................... 12
(04) Shirov,Alexei (2755) - Inarkiev,Ernesto (2681) [C95]...................................... 14
(05) Savchenko,Boris (2589) - Jakovenko,Dmitrij (2720) [C44] ............................. 15
(06) Pert,N (2539) - Williams,Simon Kim (2475) [A43] ........................................... 16
(07) Akesson,Ralf (2470) - Nyysti,Sampsa (2363) [A64]........................................ 17
(08) Jones,G (2567) - Pert,N (2539) [C03] ............................................................. 19
(09) Navarra,D (2656) - Godena,M (2535) [D45] ................................................... 21
(10) Harikrishna,P (2668) - Landa,K (2678) [C54].................................................. 23
(11) Ni Hua (2641) - Marin,Mi (2551) [C54]............................................................ 26
Editorial staff: ............................................................................................................. 28
2
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
Our supporters:
http://www.chesshouse.com/t.asp?a=452832
http://www.partypoker.com/index.htm?wm=3062517
3
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
News
Robert James Fischer 1943-2008
Robert James "Bobby" Fischer was born in Chicago, Illinois USA 9th March 1943 died in
Reykjavic, Iceland 17th January 2008 at the age of 64 of kidney problems. He achieved
international fame and notoriety at the height of cold war on the way to becoming World Chess
Champion in 1972.
Bobby Fischer learned his chess in Brooklyn New York at the age of 6. His progress at
first was not spectacular but by the age of 13 he, in his own words "got good". He became US
Junior Champion in 1956 and defended it the following year. Increasingly good results allowed
him entry to the 1958 Championships. In a shock result he won the first of his eight US
Championship titles (every time he entered) with 10.5/13, becoming in January 1958, at the age
of 14, the youngest US champion and with it he became an International Master (the youngest
at the time).
The match against Boris Spassky was at the height of the cold war and actually domi-
nated the news. Fischer it seemed got cold feet and made demands over the venue and the
prize fund. The venue was finally decided as Reykjavic and all seemed set. Then at the last
minute Fischer refused to travel unless the prize fund was increased London financier Jim Slater
added $125,000 to take the fund to a record $250,000. Fischer was still late, was defaulted
game one, the default was reversed and then Fischer lost when grabbing a pawn heshouldn't
have. Game two he did default when he claimed he could hear the cameras and that the
audience was too close. Just when people thought the match was over there was acompromise,
game three was in a table tennis room off the main venue with a close circuit camera. 2-0 down
Fischer played the Modern Benoni as black and won a smashing game.
Fischer was up and running and with wins in games 5,6, 8 and 10 had virtually secured
the title. Spassky's only win came in game 11 but a win for Fischer in game 13 restored a lead
that was never to be narrowed and the final score was 12.5 - 8.5. He had become the 11th World
Chess Champion at the age of 29 and the possibilities seemed limitless.
Fischer's greatness was the clarity, precision and beauty of his chess games, the battling
uncompromising nature he took to every tournament and match he ever played and the sheer
drama of his chess career. His personal demands and the way he raised the profile of chess led
to improved conditions for a whole generation that followed him. He took on the Soviet Chess
Machine virtually alone and won, at least over the board. It probably cost him everything else in
his life.
Leonard Barden in the Guardian
Stephen Moss in the Guardian
4
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
Sergei Movsesian won Corus B with impressive +6 and will join main event next year.
Corus C won by Fabiano Caruana, another rising star from Italy. He qualified for the
Corus B next year.
5
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
And last but not least event was the Honorary tournament. Ljubo Ljubojevic shows an
impressive form and won the competition with about 2700 perfomance!
Corus Honarary Wijk aan Zee (NED), 19-26 i 2008 cat. XIII (2560)
1 2 3 4
1. Ljubojevic, Ljubomir g SRB 2543 * * 0 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 4 2690
2. Timman, Jan H g NED 2561 1 0 * * ½ 1 ½ 0 3 2559
3. Korchnoi, Viktor g SUI 2605 ½ 0 ½ 0 * * 1 1 3 2544
4. Portisch, Lajos g HUN 2530 ½ 0 ½ 1 0 0 * * 2 2444
6
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
The Keres Memorial took place in Tallinn, Estonia 6th-12th January 2008. Time control
90 min for 40 moves + 15 min for the rest of the game + 30 sec increment for every move played
starting from the first move. Vasily Yemelin won the GMA group with 6/9.
Paul Keres Mem GMA Tallinn (EST), 6-12 i 2008 cat. X (2490)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
1. Yemelin, Vasily g RUS 2562 * ½ 0 ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 6 2607
2. Rausis, Igors g CZE 2520 ½ * 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 5½ 2566
3. Sulskis, Sarunas g LTU 2553 1 0 * ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 5½ 2563
4. Kulaots, Kaido g EST 2533 ½ ½ ½ * 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 5½ 2565
5. Onischuk, Vladimir m UKR 2474 0 ½ 0 1 * ½ 0 1 1 1 5 2535
6. Kanep, Meelis g EST 2523 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ 4½ 2486
7. Volodin, Aleksandr EST 2379 ½ 0 0 0 1 ½ * 1 ½ 0 3½ 2422
8. Gavrilov, Alexei1 m RUS 2491 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 0 * ½ 1 3½ 2410
9. Klovans, Janis g LAT 2447 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ * 1 3½ 2415
10. Seeman, Tarvo m EST 2420 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 1 0 0 * 2½ 2332
7
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
The event was a 16 player knockout. Teimour Radjabov overcame Alexander Grischuk in
a blitz playoff to win the final 2.5-1.5.
Time controls. 1st pair of games 20 mins+ 5 secs per move. Tie-breaks: If a match endws
in a draw (1-1), two additional blitz games were played. Time control 3 min+2 sec per move. If a
final tie-break was needed then a single blitz game where White has 5 mins and needs to win
the game in order to win the match. Black, with draw odds only had 4 minutes. This final tie-
break game was played without time increment.
1/8 final. Savchenko - Yakovenko 0-2. Radzhabov - Drozdovskii 1,5-0,5. Eljanov - Ivan-
chuk 0,5-1,5. Shirov - Inarkiev 0,5-1,5.
Shabalov - Svidler 0-2. Najer - Gelfand 0,5-1,5. Grischuk - Karpov 2,5-1,5. Polgar - Kar-
yakin 0-2.
1/4 final. Yakovenko - Inarkiev 1,5-0,5. Radjabov - Ivanchuk 3-2. Svidler - Grischuk 0,5-
1,5. Karyakin - Gelfand 3-1.
1/2 final. Radjabov - Yakovenko 2-0. Grischuk - Karyakin 3-2.
Final. Radjabov - Grischuk 2,5-1,5.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
1. Almasi, Zoltan g HUN 2691 * ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 6 2752
2. Gashimov, Vugar g AZE 2664 ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 5½ 2710
3. Ni Hua g CHN 2641 ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 5½ 2713
4. Harikrishna, P g IND 2668 0 ½ ½ * 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 5½ 2710
5. Landa, Konstantin g RUS 2678 ½ ½ ½ 0 * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 4½ 2628
6. Korchnoi, Viktor g SUI 2611 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 ½ ½ ½ 4 2593
7. Navara, David g CZE 2656 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 * ½ ½ 1 4 2588
8. Tiviakov, Sergei g NED 2643 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 1 3½ 2552
9. Marin, Mihail g ROU 2551 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 * ½ 3½ 2563
10. Godena, Michele g ITA 2535 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ * 3 2519
8
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
Sources:
1) http://www.e3e5.com
2) The Week In Chess http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/twic.html
3) ChessPro.ru http://www.chesspro.ru
4) CrestBook.com http://www.crestbook.com/
9
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
Games
(01) Gashimov,Vugar (2665) - XABCDEFGHY
Tiviakov,Sergei (2649) [B01] 8r+l+kvl-tr(
50th It Reggio Emilia ITA (7), 04.01.2008 7zpp+-zppzpp'
[Polivanov, Anatoliy] 6-+p+-+-+&
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qd6 Grand-
5+-+P+-+-%
master Sergej Tiviakov is a leading expert
for this continuation in Scandinavian de-
4-+-+-wq-+$
fence. 4.d4 Nf6 5.Nf3 c6 [Tiviakov also 3+-+QsN-+-#
uses 5...a6 as often as 5...c6, here's a 2PzPP+-zPPzP"
quotation: "5... c6 is another move I play 1tR-+-mKL+R!
regularly. I played it against Anand, Gris- xabcdefghy
chuk. There is nothing wrong with it..." ]
6.Ne5 Nbd7 7.Bf4 Nd5 On top level this Very boldly![Most would prefer 11.g3 ,
move was introduced in well-known game directing a bishop to the main diagonal.
Anand-Tiviakov, Wijk aan Zee 2006. But Gashimov sowed the storm... and
8.Nxd5 Nxe5!?N Novelty at 8th move - this succeeded in doing so!] 11...cxd5?
is rare case in our time! [Against Anand [There were two reasonable alternative for
Dutchman chose 8...Qxd5 and after the Black: principle 11...Qb4+ 12.c3 Qxb2
principle objection 9.Be2!? - he took a 13.Rb1 (worse 13.Rd1?! Bd7! (13...c5?
pawn: 9...Nxe5 10.Bxe5 Qxg2 11.Bf3 Qg6 14.Nc4 Qxa2 15.Qe3±) 14.dxc6 Bxc6
. Commenting the game, Viswanathan 15.Nd5 0–0–0!µ) 13...Qxa2 (13...Qa3!?)
recommended 12.Qe2 (in a game, Anand 14.Be2 (14.g3 is leading to approximately
overlooked trick: 12.d5 Bg4!³) , what was the same) 14...g6 15.dxc6 bxc6 16.Bf3
checked in two recent games: 12...h5 Qa4 (dangerous 16...Qe6 because of
(12...Qe6 13.d5!? cxd5 14.0–0–0 f6 , 17.Qd4) , and a draw seems the most
Ivanets-Smirnov, Ilichevsk 2007, and here reasonable outcome: 17.Rb4 Qa1+
was interesting 15.Bxd5 Qxe5 16.Qc4 18.Rb1=; also there is a cold-blooded
with attack) 13.h3! f6!? - we are looking 11...Bd7 12.0–0–0 e6!ч] 12.Qxd5 e6
for duel of two hungarian grandmasters, 13.Bb5+ Now, the black king loses calm
Almasi-Varga, HUNchT 2006. After for a long time. 13...Ke7 14.Qd2 Qd6
14.Bh2 the game soon ended with a 15.Qe2 White are fine maneuvering the
draw.] 9.Ne3 [Of course not 9.Nxe7?! queen, creating a threat constantly.
Qxe7 10.dxe5 Qb4+; 9.dxe5 will imply 15...Kf6 16.Qf3+ Ke7 17.Qe2 Kf6 18.Qf3+
queen's exchange, what Gashimov, per- Ke7 Draw? 19.0–0 Nope! 19...Qc5 20.Ba4
haps, tried to escape. ; And if 9.Bxe5 - Diagram
then we will come to Anand-Tiviakov.]
9...Nd3+ 10.Qxd3 Qxf4 11.d5!? Diagram XABCDEFGHY
8r+l+-vl-tr(
7zpp+-mkpzpp'
6-+-+p+-+&
5+-wq-+-+-%
4L+-+-+-+$
3+-+-sNQ+-#
2PzPP+-zPPzP"
1tR-+-+RmK-!
xabcdefghy
10
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
11
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
12
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
13
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
14
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
21.Bg5!) 19.dxe5 Nxe4 (19...Nxe5 Jakovenko knows classics very well - be-
20.Nxe5 Rxe5 21.f4ƒ) 20.Nxe4 dxe4 cause 4...Nf6 was played several times by
21.Bxe4 Bxe4 22.Qxd7 Bxf3 23.gxf3 Alexander Alekhine! [Usually happens
Rxe5=] 18.bxa6 Of course, Shirov elects 4...Bd7 5.exd5 Nd4 6.Qd1 Nxf3+ 7.Qxf3
uncompromising continuation! [After Nf6©] 5.Nxe5 Bd6 6.exd5 0–0 [6...Bxe5
18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Bxe4 Bxe4 20.Rxe4 7.dxc6 0–0 8.d4 Bd6 leads to the same.]
axb5 Black has nothing to complain 7.dxc6 Bxe5 8.d4 Bd6 9.Be3 The king on
about.] 18...Nxc3 19.Qd3 Ne4 20.Bb2 e1 seems so naked, that it's without fail to
Protecting the rook. 20...Nxg3 21.axb7 put any piece on the rank "e". [Here is an
Rxa1 22.Rxa1 e4 Diagram example of 4th World Champion's creativ-
ity: 9.Be2 Re8 10.Bg5 bxc6 11.Nd2 Qe7
XABCDEFGHY 12.Qc4 a5 13.Qd3 Bf5 14.Qf3 Qd7 15.h3
8-+-wqr+k+( Ne4 16.Be3 Nxd2 17.Kxd2 Rab8 18.b3
7+Pzpn+pvlp' c5! , and the game Rabinovich-Alekhine,
6-+-+-+p+& Moscow 1915 soon was over.] 9...Ng4
10.Nd2 Nxe3 11.fxe3 Qh4+ 12.Kd1 bxc6N
5+-+p+-+-% [A battle of two german amateurs passed
4-+-zPp+-+$ so: 12...Qf2 13.Nc4? Bg4+ 14.Kc1 Qe1+
3+P+Q+NsnP# 0–1. But Savchenko, without a doubt,
2-vLL+-zPP+" would have improved White's game.]
1tR-+-+-mK-! 13.Bd3 c5 Good move. Black are deliv-
xabcdefghy ered from a weak pawn, destroyed king's
shelter and directed bishop c8 to diagonal
23.Qb5? A mistake. Anyway, we must not a8-h1. 14.Kc2 Bb7 15.g3 Qh6 16.e4 cxd4
forget that it's rapid chess - and mistakes 17.cxd4 Diagram
are their essential part. [After only move
23.Qd1 would follow: 23...exf3 24.fxg3 XABCDEFGHY
c6! 25.Qxf3 Qb6 with a more comfortable 8r+-+-trk+(
play to Black.] 23...c6! That's it! A queen 7zplzp-+pzpp'
is distracted from the diagonal a6-f1. The 6-+-vl-+-wq&
knight g3 will jump to e2, and White will
5+-+-+-+-%
remain without a minor piece. 24.Qxc6
[24.Qa6 Nb8] 24...Ne2+ 25.Kh1 Nb8–+
4Q+-zPP+-+$
26.Qc8 exf3 27.Qxd8 fxg2+ [27...Rxd8 3+-+L+-zP-#
would more exactly: 28.Ra4 Rd7] 28.Kxg2 2PzPKsN-+-zP"
Rxd8 29.Ra8 [¹29.Ra4 - there was no 1tR-+-+-+R!
need for losing pawn d4. But position is xabcdefghy
lost in any case.] 29...Nxd4 30.Ba3 Bf8
[30...Nxc2? 31.Bd6!] 31.Bxf8 Kxf8 32.Bd1 17...c5? Now White will get a pawn pair in
Ke7 0–1 a center, and comfortable stand on с4 for
a knight. [It's desirable to go 17...Kh8!?
(05) Savchenko,Boris (2589) - but then can appear unpleasant 18.Ba6;
Jakovenko,Dmitrij (2720) [C44] That's why we must think about prophy-
2nd ACP World Rapid Cup Odessa (1.1), laxis and play 17...a5! ] 18.d5 Be5 19.Nf3
04.01.2008 Diagram
[Polivanov, Anatoliy]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.c3 Ponziani Opening XABCDEFGHY
- a rare guest in tournaments nowadays. 8r+-+-trk+(
3...d5 4.Qa4 Nf6!? We can say safely, that 7zpl+-+pzpp'
15
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
XABCDEFGHY XABCDEFGHY
8-tr-+-trk+( 8rsnl+kvl-tr(
7zp-+-+pzpp' 7zp-+pzppzpp'
6-+-+-+-+& 6-wq-+-sn-+&
5+-+Pwq-+-% 5+-zpP+-vL-%
4-+Q+-+-+$ 4p+-+-+-+$
3+R+p+-zP-# 3+-sN-+N+-#
2P+-+-+-zP" 2-zPP+PzPPzP"
1+K+-+-+R! 1tR-+QmKL+R!
xabcdefghy xabcdefghy
26...a5! Very inventive! 27.d6 [27.Qxd3 a4 It is scary to part with a pawn b2, having
28.Rxb8 Rxb8+ 29.Kc2 Qb2+ 30.Kd1 his queenside weekend, but in this case
Qa1+–+; 27.Rd1 a4 28.Qxa4 Qe2–+] Pert shows concerte approach to posi-
27...Qxd6 [27...a4 28.Qxa4 d2 would tion. 6...Qxb2 7.Bd2 Qb6 8.e4 d6 9.e5!
complete a game.] 28.Rd1 Rxb3+ 29.axb3 dxe5 10.Nxe5 Strong knight gives White
Rd8 30.Qb5 Qe6! The advantage of two extrainitiative 10...e6? [More common
extra pawns consists of that it's possible 10...g6 but... 11.Rb1 Qc7 12.Bb5+ Bd7
to sacrifice one of them for a winning 13.Bf4 Qc8 14.d6! Bg7 15.dxe7 a6
pawn endgame. 31.Rxd3 Qe4 32.Kc2 f5! 16.Nc4! axb5 17.Nd6+ Diagram
16
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
XABCDEFGHY
XABCDEFGHY 8rsn-mk-tr-+(
8rsnq+k+-tr( 7zplwq-+pzpp'
7+-+lzPpvlp' 6-+-vlpsn-+&
6-+-sN-snp+& 5+LzpP+-vL-%
5+pzp-+-+-% 4p+N+N+-+$
4p+-+-vL-+$ 3+-+-+Q+-#
3+-sN-+-+-# 2-+P+-zPPzP"
2-+P+-zPPzP" 1+-mKR+-+R!
1+R+QmK-+R! xabcdefghy
xabcdefghy
Terrible for Black. 16...Bxd5 17.Ncxd6
and Black collapses, Vyzmanavin- Qxd6 18.Rxd5 Qxd5 19.Rd1 Kc7 It looks
Arbakov,1986; One could recommend the like Black is more impatient to see this
following 10...a6!? 11.Qf3 Nbd7] 11.Qf3! game ending... 20.Rxd5 Nxd5 21.Qg3+
Diagram Kb7 22.Qd6 1–0
17
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
18
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
XABCDEFGHY XABCDEFGHY
8-+n+-+k+( 8-+-+-+k+(
7+-wql+-vlp' 7+-+-+-+p'
6p+-zp-+p+& 6p+-zp-+p+&
5zPp+Ptr-zP-% 5zPp+RvlnzP-%
4-zPp+pvL-+$ 4-zP-+-+-zP$
3+-sN-zP-+P# 3+-+-zPp+-#
2-+RwQ-zP-mK" 2-+p+-+-+"
1+-+-+R+-! 1+-+-+KsNR!
xabcdefghy xabcdefghy
New sacrifice!! [Simply 30...Bf5 After 44.Ne2 Ng3+ 45.Kf2 fxe2 46.Rc1 Bc3
31.Kg2 Qd7 32.Rh1 Ne7©] 31.Kg2?! 47.Kxg3 e1Q+ 48.Rxe1 Bxe1+] 44.Kf2
[31.Bxe5! Bxe5+ 32.f4! very unpleasant Nxd5 45.Nxf3 Bf4 The concluding moves
suprise! 32...exf3+ 33.Kg1 Bxh3 (33...Bf5 of the game deserve the traditional chess
34.Rxf3) 34.Rxf3 Qd7 35.Qf2! White stays annotators cliche" there still followed"...
better] 31...Bf5 32.Ne2 Qd7 33.Rh1 Qf7 46.Nd4 Be3+ 47.Kf3 Bxd4 48.Ke4 Be3 0–1
34.Bxe5 Bxe5 Leaves Black with an ad-
vantage in all continuations. A defence is (08) Jones,G (2567) - Pert,N (2539)
not easy, but it's not so easy to crush [C03]
White with a direct attack. 35.Rcc1 Ne7 Premier Hastings ENG (10), 06.01.2008
36.Rcd1 Bc8! Excelent! Pair of bishops [Kryakvin Dmitry]
with pawn falange gains good chance for 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Be7 4.Ngf3 Nf6
winning 37.Ng1? Mistake.Only move 5.e5 Nfd7 6.Bd3 c5 7.0–0 Seldom move
[37.Nf4! Bb7 38.Qe2! Bxf4 39.exf4 Nxd5 [Chess fashions are fickle even at the GM
40.Rxd5!] 37...c3 38.Qc2 Qf5! 39.h4 Bb7 level.A mere couple of years ago White
Diagram played 7.c3 Nc6 8.0–0 g5!? Such line is
not to Jones's taste] 7...cxd4 8.Nb3 Nc6
XABCDEFGHY 9.Re1 Nc5 Novelty. [Alternative line is
8-+-+-+k+( 9...Qb6 10.Bf4 Nc5 11.Nbxd4 Nxd4
7+l+-sn-+p' 12.Nxd4 Nxd3 13.Qxd3 Bd7 14.c3=]
6p+-zp-+p+& 10.Nxc5 A novel atack idea.A move on re-
cord in this position is [10.Nbxd4 Qb6
5zPp+PvlqzP-%
11.Bf4 Nxd4 12.Nxd4] 10...Bxc5 11.Ng5
4-zP-+p+-zP$ Bb4!? [11...h6? 12.Qh5 Qd7 13.Nxf7! 0–0
3+-zp-zP-+-# 14.Ng5!; 11...g6?! 12.Qg4 Be7 13.h4‚]
2-+Q+-zPK+" 12.Qf3?! This move Black can followed
1+-+R+-sNR! [Interesting 12.Bd2 Bxd2 13.Qxd2©]
xabcdefghy 12...Qe7?! [This time Pert overlooks
12...f5! 13.exf6 Qxf6µ] 13.Re2 h6
By maneuvering in his own camp,Nyysti 14.Nh7!! Diagram
has archieved positional advanteges and
now activate his quuen.It is difficult for
Ekesson to protect all the points that are
weak.... 40.Kf1 Bxd5 41.f4? White turns to
tactical play,which only hastens the inevi-
table 41...exf3! 42.Qxf5 Nxf5 43.Rxd5
Nxe3+ [Other way 43...c2!! Diagram
19
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
XABCDEFGHY XABCDEFGHY
8r+l+k+-tr( 8r+-+kvl-tr(
7zpp+-wqpzpN' 7zpp+lwqp+-'
6-+n+p+-zp& 6-+-+pzP-+&
5+-+pzP-+-% 5+L+p+-+p%
4-vl-zp-+-+$ 4-sn-zp-+Q+$
3+-+L+Q+-# 3+-+-+-vL-#
2PzPP+RzPPzP" 2PzPP+RzPPzP"
1tR-vL-+-mK-! 1tR-+-+-mK-!
xabcdefghy xabcdefghy
Only forward!! 14...Qh4 15.Bf4 Bf8! Prin- 21.fxe7 (21.Qh3 Qxf6 22.Be5 Qh6µ)
cipal move.Only draw in variation 21...hxg4 22.exf8Q+ Rxf8µ; the inferior
[15...Bd7 16.Bg3 Qe7 17.Qg4 Rxh7 line was 20...Qc5?? 21.Rxe6+! Kd8
18.Bxh7 g6 Diagram 22.Bxd7] 21.Be5 This leads to forced play
21...Qg5 22.Bxd7+ Kxd7 23.Qxg5 hxg5
XABCDEFGHY 24.Bxh8 The rook is not stronger then
8r+-+k+-+( knight in such position. There is no
7zpp+lwqp+L' opened files on board! 24...Rc8 25.c3
6-+n+p+pzp& dxc3 26.Bxc3 Diagram
5+-+pzP-+-%
4-vl-zp-+Q+$ XABCDEFGHY
3+-+-+-vL-# 8-+r+-vl-+(
2PzPP+RzPPzP" 7zpp+k+p+-'
1tR-+-+-mK-! 6-+-+p+-+&
xabcdefghy 5+-+p+-zp-%
4-sn-+-+-+$
19.a3! Ba5 20.Bh4 Qf8 21.Bf6 Bd8 22.Qf4 3+-vL-+-+-#
Bxf6 23.Qxf6 Qe7 24.Qh8+ Qf8 25.Qf6=] 2PzP-+RzPPzP"
16.Bg3 Qe7 17.Qg4 Nb4? [Black should 1tR-+-+-mK-!
have played 17...Bd7! 18.Bh4 g5 19.Nf6+ xabcdefghy
Kd8 20.Bg3 Bg7 21.Nh5 Rg8 with the idea
Rc8,Kd8-c7-b8!] 18.Bb5+? [It would have 26...Nc6 [26...Rc4! with view to "c" file or
been better po play simply 18.Nxf8! Kxf8 the fourth rank] 27.Rd1 Bc5 28.g3! Black
19.Qxd4±] 18...Bd7 19.Nf6+? New over- pawn is centre advance like a steamrol-
look [19.Bxd7+! Qxd7 20.Nxf8 Kxf8 ler!White must blocked them 28...b5
21.Qxd4 Qb5 22.Qd1 Rc8 23.c3 Nc6 29.Kg2 d4 30.f4! The situation becomes
24.f3=] 19...gxf6 20.exf6 Qxf6? [A "must" unclear.Black is only slightly worse off
20...h5!! Diagram 30...gxf4 31.gxf4 f6 32.Be1! Kd6 33.Bh4
Rf8 34.Rde1 Nd8 The last critical position
[34...Kd5 Diagram
20
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
21
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
7.Qxc4 Bd6 8.Bg2 0–0 9.0–0 e5 10.Rd1] Nd7 15.Ne4! and White takes control over
6...dxe4 [Worse looks 6...Bb4 because of important squares d6 and f6, at the same
catching of space advantage 7.e5 Ne4 time blocks the best way of Black piece
8.Be2 Nb6?! (8...f5!?) 9.Qc2 (9.cxd5!? development 15...b6 16.Rd1 0–0 17.Qg3
exd5 (9...Nxd5? 10.Qxe4 Nxc3 11.bxc3 Qe5 18.Qxe5 Nxe5 19.Nd6 Bd7 20.Be2
Bxc3+ 12.Bd2 Bxa1 13.0–0 Bb2 14.Bb4±; Ba4 21.Rd2 Rfd8 22.f4 Ng6 23.Bf3 Rab8
9...cxd5? 10.Qb5++-; 9...Qxd5 10.0–0 24.g3² ½–½ Benjamin,J (2576)-
Nxc3 11.bxc3±) 10.0–0 Bf5 11.Qe3²) Christiansen,L (2575)/ICC INT 2007/The
9...Nxc3 10.bxc3 Be7 11.c5 (11.cxd5!? Week in Chess 676 (47)] 13.Bd3 [It was
exd5 (11...cxd5?! 12.0–0²; 11...Nxd5 too early for 13.b4 because White's pawn
12.0–0 c5 13.Bb2 Bd7 14.Qe4 Bc6 can be attacked immidiately 13...Qe7
15.Qg4²) 12.h3 Be6 13.0–0 Qd7²) 14.Bd3 a5 15.Rb1 axb4 16.axb4 Nf6
11...Nd7 12.c4² spaces defect take dis- 17.Qe3 0–0= 0–1 Kasimdzhanov,R
comfort to Black, and the only way to get (2690)-Nakamura,H (2648)/Bastia FRA
rid from it is to make weaknesses.] 7.Nxe4 2007/The Week in Chess 678 (41)]
Nxe4 [7...c5 8.Nxf6+ Nxf6 9.Bd2 cxd4 13...Nf6 14.Qe2 0–0 The strongest, I think
10.Nxd4 Bc5 11.Nb3 Qxd3 12.Bxd3 Be7² [14...b6 Makes an object, which White
1–0 Meister,Y (2415)-Belikov,V can attack by c-pawn in future 15.b4 Qc7
(2375)/Kuibyshev 1990/CBM 021 (59)] 16.0–0 Bb7 17.Rac1 0–0 18.c5 bxc5
8.Qxe4 Bb4+ To smooth over some 19.Rxc5² ½–½ Sokolov,I (2620)-
Whites' space advantage(4 lines for ma- Thorhallsson,T (2495)/Elista 1998/CBM
neuvers versus 3) black tries to exchange 066 ext (46)] 15.0–0 The opening is over.
some piece to escape crush 9.Bd2 Bxd2+ White have a good position, but Black
10.Nxd2 have no weaknesses, so they can rely on
equal 15...Rd8 16.b4 Qc7 [16...Qd4 is bad
XABCDEFGHY 17.Nf3 Qxd3?? 18.Rad1+-; If Black will try
8r+lwqk+-tr( to change Queens 16...Qh5 White will
7zpp+n+pzpp' have strong move 17.Ne4! Qxe2 18.Nxf6+
6-+p+p+-+& gxf6 19.Bxe2² because of potential
weakness on h7 white have some advan-
5+-+-+-+-% tage] 17.Rac1
4-+PzPQ+-+$
3+-+-+-+-# XABCDEFGHY
2PzP-sN-zPPzP" 8r+ltr-+k+(
1tR-+-mKL+R! 7zppwq-+pzpp'
xabcdefghy 6-+-+psn-+&
5+-+-+-+-%
10...c5 That move is used to avoid varia-
tion with 0–0–0, especially as this position
4-zPP+-+-+$
already happended in David's game with 3zP-+L+-+-#
Akopian in Ordix-open [10...0–0 11.0–0– 2-+-sNQzPPzP"
0 c5 12.Nf3 cxd4 13.Qxd4 Qe7 14.Bd3 1+-tR-+RmK-!
Nc5 15.Bc2 b6 16.b4 Nb7 17.Qh4 Qxh4 xabcdefghy
18.Nxh4 1–0 Navara,D (2656)-Akopian,V
(2708)/Mainz GER 2007/The Week in 17...Bd7! keeps b-pawn on a basic place
Chess 667 (54)] 11.dxc5 [Now Black can't 18.c5 Bc6= 19.Nf3 [deserved of attention
play 11.0–0–0 because of 11...Nf6] 19.Nc4!? with the view of catching d6-
11...Qa5 12.a3 Qxc5 [Worse was square 19...Rd5 (19...Nd5 20.Qe4 Nf6
12...Nxc5 because of 13.Qe3 Qc7 14.b4 21.Qe5 Qxe5 22.Nxe5 Ba4=) 20.Nd6 Rd8
22
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
23
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
24
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
16.Bc2 Qd7 17.Qd2 Rad8 18.a4 Nh5 18.Rf2² White saves some advantage,
19.b4 d5 20.exd5 Qxd5 21.b5 e4 22.Ne3 'cause bishop on a7 is off as be-
Bxe3 23.fxe3 Nxg3+ 24.hxg3 exf3 fore.(18.Ng5+ hxg5 19.hxg5 d5 20.Qh3+
25.bxc6 Rxe3 26.Qxe3 fxg2+ 27.Kh2 Kg8 21.Qe6+=) ] 14.exd4 c5 Landa con-
gxf1N+ 28.Rxf1 Qxc6 29.Qe5+ Kg8 tinues to "clear the road" for bishop
30.Rf2 Re8 0–1 Chandler,M (2485)- [14...d5 15.Kh1 c5] 15.Kh1 cxd4?!
Karpov,A (2710)/Bath 1983/MCD) [15...d5! is more perspective - blocks
11.Nbd2 Nh5 12.Kh1 Ng7 13.h3 Bh5 bishop on b3 16.dxc5 Bxc5 17.exd5 Nf5
14.Bh2 Kh8 15.Nc4 Qf6 16.g4 Bg6 (17...Nxd5? 18.Ne4) 18.Ne4 Ne3 19.Qd3
17.Ne3 Ne6 18.Nf5 Ba7 19.Qe2 Rae8 (19.Qe1 Ba7) 19...Nxf1 20.Rxf1©]
20.Rae1 Bh7 21.Nd2 Ne7 22.Qf3 h5 16.Nxd4! 2 white pieces have already at-
23.Nc4 Nf4 24.Bc2 Neg6 25.Nce3 h4 tacked f7-square... [16.cxd4 d5=] 16...d5
26.Ng2 Nxg2 27.Kxg2 Qd8 28.Bb3 f6 17.N2f3 dxe4? Black obvious underesti-
29.Kh1 Ne7 30.Nh6 Kg7 31.Nf5+ Nxf5 mate white's pressure on f7. It was neces-
32.gxf5 Bg8 33.Qh5 Bf7 34.Bxf7 Rxf7 sary to take control over e5-square
35.Rd1 c5 36.c4 Kf8 ½–½ Shanava,K [17...Qd6 18.Qe2 Be6 19.Rae1²;
(2532)-Sargissian,G (2651)/Dresden GER 17...Bb8!? 18.Qd3 dxe4 19.Qxe4 Qd6
2007] 9...Ng4!? Very interesting move. 20.Rad1²] 18.Ne5± Be6 [18...Kh7
Black exchange advantage for strength- 19.Nxf7 Qa5 20.Qe2+-] 19.Nxe6 Qxd1
ening white's center and giving half-open
line "f" [other way was 9...Bxe3 - see XABCDEFGHY
8.Be3 Bxe3 10.fxe3 Ne7 11.Nbd2 Ng6 8r+-+-trk+(
12.Qe1 c6] 10.d4 [10.Bxc5 with pawn on 7vlp+-snpzp-'
c3 this exchange is not good, because 6p+-+N+-zp&
d3-pawn became week. 10...dxc5]
10...Ba7 11.Nbd2
5+-+-sN-+-%
4-+-+p+-+$
XABCDEFGHY 3+LzP-+-+P#
8r+lwq-trk+( 2PzP-+-+P+"
7vlpzp-+pzp-' 1tR-+q+R+K!
6p+nzp-+-zp& xabcdefghy
5+-+-zp-+-%
20.Nxf8!! Nice and strong shot! [worse
4-+-zPP+n+$ was 20.Raxd1 fxe6 21.Bxe6+ Kh7 22.Nf7ƒ
3+LzP-vLN+-# but white saving the iniciative too (22.Rxf8
2PzP-sN-zPPzP" Rxf8 23.Rd7?? Rf1+ 24.Kh2 Bb8!) ]
1tR-+Q+RmK-! 20...Qxb3 [20...Qxf1+ 21.Rxf1 Rxf8
xabcdefghy (21...Kxf8 22.Rxf7+ Ke8 23.Rxg7+-)
22.Nxf7 Rb8 23.Nd6+ Kh8 24.Nxe4 White
11...Ne7 One's again standard maneuver
has extra pawn+initiaciative] 21.axb3 Rxf8
for this variation [But It is interesting to try
22.g4 Harikrishna tries to prevent conec-
11...Na5!? with idea to take away pres-
tion of black pawns. [The other way was
sure from f7-pawn 12.Bc2 c5= Black's 22.Rad1!? e3 23.Rd7 e2 24.Re1 Nf5
position is not worse] 12.h3 Forces ex-
25.g4™ Bf2 26.Rxe2 Ng3+ 27.Kg2 Nxe2
change 12...Nxe3 13.fxe3 exd4 Black tries
28.Kxf2 b5 29.Kxe2 Re8 30.Rd5 f6
to open position to show the power [В
31.Ke3 fxe5 32.Rd6 and because of their
случае 13...Ng6 14.Qe1 Kh7 15.Qg3 f5 very active pieces, white must win]
16.exf5 Bxf5 17.h4!? Bd3 (17...e4? 22...Nd5 23.Rae1 Re8 24.Rf5 g6?
18.Ng5+! hxg5 19.Rxf5! Rxf5 20.Qg4±) [24...Ne3?? 25.Rxf7 Rxe5 26.Rxb7+-; the
25
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
only way was 24...Ne7 25.Rf4 e3© with 10...Nxd2! 11.Kxd2™ (11.Bxd2 Nxd4;
some compensation] 25.Nxg6! Ne3?! 11.Nxd2 Nxd4; 11.Qxd2 Ba5) 11...Bg4
[¹25...Nxc3 but after 26.Nf4 Nb5 12.Bxc6 bxc6 13.Qa4 Bxf3 14.gxf3 f6ƒ 0–
27.Nh5+- White has wining position] 1 Sveshnikov,E (2545)-Morovic Fernan-
26.Re5+- Russian GM probably missed dez,I (2470)/Rio de Janeiro 1985/EXT
this move 26...Rd8 27.Nf4 Nd1 28.Rd5 1999 (41); 9.h3!? Bd7 10.Bd3?! (10.a4!?;
Nf2+ 29.Kg2 1–0 10.Be2!?) 10...Nb4! 11.Be2?! (11.0–0=)
11...c5 12.Be3 cxd4 13.Nxd4 Nc6³ 0–1
(11) Ni Hua (2641) - Marin,Mi (2551) Vachier Lagrave,M (2573)-Eljanov,P
[C54] (2675)/Wijk aan Zee NED 2007/The Week
50th It Reggio Emilia ITA (9), 06.01.2008 in Chess 638 (29)] 9...0–0 10.Be3
[Khusnutdinov,Rustam] [10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.Be3 f5 12.exf6 Qxf6
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 13.Nxe4? dxe4 14.Nd2 Ba6 15.Nxe4
5.d4 [5.d3 is more popular] 5...exd4 6.e5 Ba5+ 16.Nc3 Bxc3+ 17.bxc3 Qg6
This variant often used by Poland GM B. 18.Rb1?! Bd3 19.Rb7 Bc2 20.Qe2 Rab8
Macieja. Nowadays there are no advan- 21.Qc4+ Kh8 22.Rxb8 Rxb8–+ 23.Ke2
tage for white. [6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 Rb2 24.Qc5 Bb3+ 25.Kf3 Bd5+ 26.Kf4
(7.Nc3 Nxe4 8.0–0 Bxc3 9.d5 Ne5 Qe4+ 27.Kg3 Qxg2+ 28.Kh4 Qxh1 0–1
10.bxc3 Nxc4 11.Qd4 0–0 12.Qxe4 Nd6 Macieja, B (2653) - Veskovi, G (2633)/
13.Qd3 b6 14.Ba3 Qf6 15.Qd4 Qxd4 Bermuda 2004/CBM 098] 10...Bg4
16.Nxd4 Bb7³ 0–1 Comp Fritz 6-Anand,V [10...Ne7 11.0–0 (11.Bd3 Nxc3 12.bxc3
(2781)/Frankfurt 1999/CBM 072 (45)) Bf5 13.0–0 Qd7 14.Nh4 Bxd3 15.Qxd3 f5
7...Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 d5 9.exd5 Nxd5 16.Bg5 Ng6 17.Nxg6 hxg6 18.a4 c6 19.e6
10.Qb3 Nce7 11.0–0 0–0=] 6...d5 This Qxe6 20.Rfe1 Qc8 21.a5© ½–½ Moro-
and some next move are forced 7.Bb5 zevich,A (2595)-Malaniuk,V (2610)/ Kras-
Ne4 8.cxd4 Bb6 the first deviation [Much nodar 1997/EXT 2000) 11...c6 12.Bd3
more popular is 8...Bb4+ 9.Bd2 (9.Nbd2 Nxc3 13.bxc3 Bf5 14.Nh4 Bxd3 15.Qxd3
0–0 10.a3 Bxd2+ 11.Bxd2 Bg4 12.Bxc6 Qd7 16.f4² ½–½ Macieja,B (2633)-
bxc6 13.Rc1 f6 14.Bb4 Re8³ 0–1 Asa- Aronian,L (2645)/ Antalya 2004/CBM 101
nov,B (2200)-Vladimirov,E (2550)/Alma- (44)] 11.Qc2!? Ni Hua's patent. White's
Ata 1989/EXT 1997 (30)) 9...Nxd2 idea is to crush knight on e4.exchange
10.Bxc6+ bxc6 11.Nbxd2 c5 12.a3 Bxd2+ own bishop on c6 and play against off-
13.Qxd2 c4 (13...Bg4 14.dxc5 Bxf3 bishop on b6 [11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.Qa4
15.gxf3 0–0© 1–0 Macieja,B (2635)- (12.h3 Be6; 12.0–0) 12...c5 (12...Bd7
Aleksandrov,A (2664)/Plovdiv 2003/CBM 13.Qa3 f5 14.exf6 Nxf6 15.0–0–0 Bg4
098 (61)) 14.0–0 Rb8 15.Rfe1 0–0 16.Qa6 Qd6 17.a4 Rab8 18.Rd2 Bc8
16.Qc2 g6 17.Nd2 Qg5 18.Re3 Qg4 19.Qd3 Ba5 20.Rc2 Ng4 21.Re2 Bf5
19.Qc3 c5 20.Nf3 cxd4 21.Nxd4 Rb6= ½– 22.Qd2 Rb3 23.Bf4 Qb4 24.Rhe1 Qc4 0–1
½ Sveshnikov,E (2508)-Stefansson,H Mannion,S (2331)-Mikhalevski,V
(2549)/Liepaya 2004/CBM 103 (25)] (2572)/Port Erin 2005/CBM 108 ext)
9.Nc3 the struggle goes near bishop on 13.dxc5 Bxf3 14.gxf3 Nxc5 15.Bxc5 Bxc5
b6 - either it will be paralyse white's foces 16.0–0–0 Bxf2 17.Nxd5 Qh4 18.Qxh4
against defense of d4-pawn, or will be Bxh4= ½–½ Macieja,B (2592) - Gra-
turned off for a long time. That's why pri- barczyk, M (2484)/ Warsaw 2005/CBM
mary task for white is to strengthen that 110 ext (52)] 11...Bxf3?! In my opinion,
pawn. In that reason exchange on c3 al- the first mistake. It is not right to open
most always is bad for black. [Somewhat lines on the King's side, because many
weaker is another way to develop queen- black's pieces are sticked on the queen's
side 9.Be3 0–0 10.Nbd2?! in view of side and they can't help their own king in
26
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
few time. [More solid is 11...Bf5 12.Qb3 Rxa4 21.Rh3 h6 22.Bxh6+-) 20.f4 f5
Ne7 13.Be2 c6 14.0–0 f6 15.exf6 Rxf6 21.Qf3ƒ] 17.Qh5
16.Ne5 Ng6 17.Na4 Nxe5 18.Nxb6 axb6
19.dxe5 Rg6„ ½–½ Ni Hua (2641)- XABCDEFGHY
Navara,D (2656)/Reggio Emilia ITA 8r+-wq-trk+(
2007/The Week in Chess 686 (44)] 7zp-zp-+-zpp'
12.gxf3 Ng5 black tries to use some expo- 6-vlp+-zp-+&
sure of white's pawns. But white's argu-
ment( space advantage, open "g" line)
5+-+pzP-+Q%
looks stronger.
4-+-zP-+-sn$
3+-sN-vL-+-#
XABCDEFGHY 2PzP-+-zP-zP"
8r+-wq-trk+( 1+-mKR+-tR-!
7zppzp-+pzpp' xabcdefghy
6-vln+-+-+&
17...Ng6? Passive defense is doomed for
5+L+pzP-sn-%
misfortune [it was necessary radically
4-+-zP-+-+$ change the way of the struggle 17...fxe5!?
3+-sN-vLP+-# 18.Bg5 Qd7 19.Qxh4 Bxd4 but after
2PzPQ+-zP-zP" 20.Rxd4 exd4 21.Qxd4 I prefer white's
1tR-+-mK-+R! position] 18.Rg3± fxe5 19.Rh3 Qf6?
xabcdefghy [19...Kf7™ 20.Rg1 Rh8 21.Qf5+ Qf6
22.Qd7+ Qe7 23.Rf3+ Kg8 24.Qxc6±]
13.Bxc6? Not clear perform of the right 20.Rg1!‚ White's attack is irresistible
idea. It was necessary to castle at first. 20...exd4 21.Qxh7+ Kf7 22.Rxg6 Qxg6
[the better was 13.0–0–0! Nxf3 14.Bxc6 23.Rf3+ Qf6 24.Rxf6+ Kxf6 25.Qh4+ Ke5
bxc6 15.Qe2 and with transposition we 26.Qe7+ Kf5 27.Qd7+ Kg6 28.Bxd4+-
came to position on the game] 13...bxc6? White has material and position advantage
Black didn't use his chance! [13...Nxf3+! plus attack on the black king. Is this stage
14.Ke2 Nxd4+ 15.Bxd4 Bxd4 16.Bxb7 Chinese GM was exact 28...Bxd4 29.Qg4+
(16.Bxd5 Bxc3 17.Rad1 Bxe5 18.Bxf7+ Kh7 30.Qxd4 Rf6 31.Nd1! Knight goes to
Rxf7 19.Rxd8+ Rxd8©) 16...Rb8 17.Bc6 the King side 31...a6 32.Ne3 Re8 33.Ng4
Qh4‚ the struggle are going to all 3 re- Rfe6 34.Qd3+ Kh8 35.Qxa6 c5 36.Qd3 c4
sults] 14.0–0–0 Nxf3 else black will suffer 37.Qh3+ [Other way was 37.Qxd5 ]
for "free" 15.Qe2 Nh4 [15...Ng5 16.f4 Ne4 37...Kg8 38.Ne3 c6 39.Qg4 Rf6 40.Qd7
17.Nxe4 dxe4 18.f5‚ - Black is hard to Re4 41.Nf5 Rf7 42.Qd8+ [42.Qd8+ Rf8
make a counter-play on the Queen's side, 43.Qg5 Rf7 44.Nh6+] 1–0
while whtie's initiative is delevoped with-
out any obstacles] 16.Rhg1 f6! the best
chance [16...Qd7 17.Qh5 Nf5 18.Bh6
Nxh6 19.Qxh6 (19.Rxg7+ Kxg7 20.Qg5+
Kh8=) 19...f6 (19...g6 20.Rd3±) 20.e6
Qe7 21.Ne2ƒ; 16...Ng6!? 17.Rg3 (17.Qh5
Qh4) 17...Ba5 18.Na4 (18.Qh5 Bxc3
19.bxc3 Qe7„) 18...Rb8 19.Rdg1
(19.Qh5 Qh4) 19...Qh4 (19...Rb4 20.Qh5
27
© ChessZone Magazine #2, 2008 http://www.chesszone.org
Editorial staff:
28