Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lixiviacion Pirrotita
Lixiviacion Pirrotita
Abstract
A kinetic study of the batch leaching of a pyrrhotite ore by a sulfooxidans strain is reported in this work. A mathematical model
consistent with experimental data is developed, which takes into account both direct and indirect mechanism. The development has
been performed from a separate study of microorganisms' adsorption on the solid surface and of chemical leaching of pyrrhotite by
ferric iron. The representative equations of these phenomena (Langmuir equation and a kinetic model with variable activation energy,
respectively) have been combined with material balances of total iron, ferric iron and biomass. The "nal model consists of a system of
three ordinary di!erential equations, where the independent variable is time and dependent variables are total iron, ferric iron and
biomass concentrations in solution. The key parameters of the model were: the speci"c growth rate, k , the growth yield, >@ of
A A
adsorbed bacteria, and the reaction rate constant of ferrous iron oxidation, k. These parameters were estimated by curve "tting using
experimental data and estimated values (k "1.34$0.02 d~1, >@ "3.6$0.3]1013 cells/mol, k"0.229$0.004 d~1) are in agree-
A A
ment with values found in the literature. ( 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Pyrrhotite; Bioleaching; Kinetic modeling; Thiobacillus thiooxidans; Direct and indirect mechanisms
0009-2509/00/$ - see front matter ( 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 0 9 - 2 5 0 9 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 3 5 4 - 1
784 F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795
Nomenclature
A surface area of solid particles, (m2) r 3` ferric iron generation rate, due to chemical
F% ,'%/
A initial surface area of solid particles, (m2) oxidation of ferrous iron, (mol/d/m3)
0
C0 3` initial ferric iron concentration in solution, t time, (d)
F%
(mol/m3, mM) ¹ temperature, (K)
C0 pyrrhotite concentration in the solid}liquid < volume of solid}liquid mixture, (m3)
F%S
mixture at the beginning of the process, X number of adsorbed bacteria per unit
A
(mol/m3) weight of mineral ore, (cell/g)
C 2` ferrous iron concentration in the liquid phase, X concentration of the adsorbed bacteria
F% a
(mol/m3) per unit surface area of solid particles,
C 3` ferric iron concentration in solution, (mol/m3, (cell/m2)
F%
mM) X maximum adsorption capacity per unit
Am
C pyrrhotite concentration in the solid}liquid weight of solid particles, (cell/kg)
F%S
mixture during the process, (mol/m3) X maximum adsorption capacity per unit sur-
am
C 505 total iron concentration in the liquid phase, face area of solid particles, (cell/m2)
F%
(mol/m3) X concentration of the free bacteria in the
L
k "rst-order rate constant, (d~1) liquid phase, (cell/ml)
K adsorption equilibrium constant, (m3/cell) X total concentration of bacteria in the
A T
R universal gas constant, (J/mol/K) solid}liquid mixture, (cell/m3)
R growth rate of adsorbed bacteria, (cell/d/m3) >@ growth yield of bacteria on pyrrhotite ore,
A A
r leaching rate of pyrrhotite by direct bacterial (cell/mol)
B
action, (mol FeS/d/m3) a pyrrhotite conversion
r leaching rate of pyrrhotite by ferric iron, (mol k speci"c growth rate of bacteria on solid sur-
C A
FeS/d/m3) face, (d~1)
r 3` ferric iron consumption rate, due to chemical h fraction of adsorption sites unoccupied by
F% ,#0/4 v
leaching of pyrrhotite, (mol/d/m3) cells, (dimensionless)
the model is valid for sulfooxidans microorganisms, and Flasks were incubated at 303C on a rotary shaker (New
this aspect represents the novelty of the mathematical Brunswick mod. G25) at 200 rpm. An inoculum age of
approach. about 6 d was used in the experimental trials.
Fig. 1. Equilibrium adsorption isotherm for bacteria adsorption on pyrrhotite ore particles. Solid line represents calculated values by the Langmuir
equation (temperature 303C; pyrrhotite concentration: 3}5 per cent).
mechanism of bioleaching. A kinetic model for this chem- energy on the pyrrhotite conversion (Brittan, 1975). Fig. 2
ical reaction has been developed and the detailed analysis shows experimental and calculated pyrrhotite conversions
reported elsewhere (Beolchini & Veglio', submitted). The vs. time pro"les, at di!erent experimental conditions.
study performed has demonstrated that:
3.3. Bioleaching
f the sulfur moiety of pyrrhotite is oxidised incompletely
by ferric iron to elemental sulfur as shown by Eq. (2): Typical bioleaching behavior of the pyrrhotite ore is
shown in Figs. 3 and 4, where pH, total iron, ferric iron,
FeS#2Fe3`H3Fe2`#S". (2)
sulphate and cell concentration are reported as a func-
f the process kinetics is controlled by the chemical reac- tion of time. Experimental trials have been performed in
tion, as con"rmed by an activation energy of the pro- duplicate, in order to have an indication of the process
cess equal to about 100 kJ/mol. reproducibility.
f the mathematical model able to predict the process Fig. 3 shows that the e!ect of microorganisms on
kinetics is the following: pyrrhotite oxidation is remarkable. In fact, in the absence
of biomass, no increase in the iron dissolution was ob-
C A B D
da 99]103 1 1 27]103a served after the "rst two days of treatment.
"1440.8]10~4e ! ! ! ,
dt R ¹ 298 R¹ Data reported in Figs. 3 and 4 have been used in order
to represent the relative increase of total iron as a func-
A B
C 3` 0.47
] F% (1!a)2@3, (3) tion of the relative increase of sulfate (Fig. 5). Considering
1000
that the slope of the regression line is equal to 1, the
where a is the pyrrhotite conversion, t the time (d), bacterial leaching seems to proceed stoichiometrically,
C 3` the ferric iron concentration in solution (mol/m3), according to the following reaction:
F%
R the universal gas constant (J/mol/K), and ¹ the tem-
FeS#2O PFe2`#SO2~. (4)
perature (K). 2 4
The model has been developed from the unreacted No precipitation takes place in the tested experimental
core model, considering a dependence of the activation conditions. In fact, the ratio between relative increases of
F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795 787
Fig. 2. Experimental (points) and calculated by the unreacted core model with variable activation energy (lines) values of pyrrhotite conversion during
chemical leaching with ferric iron.
Fig. 3. Total and ferric iron vs. time pro"les during pyrrhotite bioleaching (initial ferric iron 0; mineral concentration 3 per cent w/v; temperature
303C). Solid lines represent calculated values by the developed mathematical model. Dotted lines are related to trials with no microorganisms.
788 F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795
Fig. 4. pH, sulfate and cell concentration vs. time pro"les during pyrrhotite bioleaching (initial ferric iron 0; mineral concentration 3 per cent w/v;
temperature 303C).
iron and sulfate was constant and equal to 1 during the signi"cant ferric iron concentrations are determined in
whole trial. A con"rmation was given by the treatment of the solution. This is due to a very fast indirect mechanism
solid residues with HCl 5 M (Bhatti et al., 1993). Neither with respect to the chemical oxidation of ferrous iron. In
iron, nor sulfate were found in solution after the acid fact, the ferric iron formed after chemical oxidation of
treatment. Consequently, precipitate compounds such as ferrous iron (Eq. (5)) is immediately involved in the in-
ferric hydroxide or jarosites (Bhatti et al., 1993) were direct mechanism and it is reduced according to Eq. (2).
demonstrated not to be formed on the mineral surface. These results evidence that the presence of both pyrrho-
Furthermore, the bioleaching process was not limited by tite and microorganisms have a positive e!ect on the
mass transfer rates of gaseous solutes, such as oxygen and ferrous iron oxidation, even if the bacterial strain is not
carbon dioxide. In fact, the shaking rate had no signi"- a ferrooxidans one. Some tests were performed in order
cant e!ect on the oxidation rate of pyrrhotite, with to verify if the selected microorganisms were really
a 3 per cent (w/v) solid concentration. sulfooxidans. From an inoculated #ask containing
The ferrous iron formed after pyrrhotite bioleaching is pyrrhotite 3 per cent (w/v) an inoculum was performed
consequently oxidised according to the reaction into a #ask containing 9 K medium and ferrous sulfate
as energy source (no mineral). The cell concentration
4Fe2`#O #4H`P4Fe3`#2H O. (5)
2 2 was monitored during time and the obtained results are
If microorganisms use the ferrous iron oxidation as shown in Fig. 6. It is evident that no cell growth
energy source, i.e. they are ferrooxidans, this is a biolo- took place, not even after an initial lag phase for cell
gical reaction and it is very fast (Konishi et al., 1992). adaptation. Optical microscope observation and some
Otherwise the ferrous iron oxidation proceeds more growth tests on selective solid media for T. thiooxidans
slowly, and it is due just to the oxygen chemical action. and T. ferrooxidans (Visca, Bianchi, Polidoro, Buon"glio,
Fig. 3 shows that in the absence of microorganisms no Valenti & Orsi, 1989; Atlas, 1993) were also performed.
F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795 789
Fig. 5. Relative increase of iron and sulfate during pyrrhotite bioleaching (initial ferric iron 0; mineral concentration 3 per cent w/v; temperature 303C).
The solid line represents the stoichiometric increase (slope"1).
Fig. 6. Cell concentration vs. time pro"le during growth in 9 K medium with FeSO as energetic source (no mineral; temperature 303C; inoculum from
4
pyrrhotite 3 per cent).
790 F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795
A very remarkable growth was observed just in the (Eq. (2)), as follows:
T. thiooxidans selective solid medium. Furthermore, the
dC 3`
results shown in Fig. 4 also evidence that microorgan- F% "r 3` #r 3` (7)
dt F% ,'%/ F% ,#0/
isms were sulfooxidans. In fact, sulfate and cell concen-
tration vs. time pro"les proceed in the same way. The ferric iron consumption rate can be related to the
chemical leaching rate considering the stoichiometry of
Eq. (2):
4. Mathematical model for pyrrhotite bioleaching r 3` "!2 ) r (8)
F% ,#0/4 C
The theoretical approach reported here has been de- where r (mol FeS/d/m3), the chemical leaching rate, is
C
veloped considering as a reference the model of Konishi linked to Eq. (3) according to the following expression:
et al. (1992) for batch zinc sul"de leaching by T. fer- dC
rooxidans. As for pyrrhotite, zinc sul"de bioleaching is r "! F%S
C dt
due to a direct and indirect bacterial action. In the direct
C A B
99]103 1 1
action, bacteria multiply on the sul"de mineral that acts "C0 1440.8]10~4e ! !
F%S R ¹ 298
as a solid substrate; parts of the cells are released from the
DA B
solid surface into the liquid medium. In the presence of 27]103a C 3` 0.47
ferric iron, chemical leaching occurs, with formation of ! F% (1!a)h (9)
R¹ 1000 v
ferrous iron. In the Konishi et al. (1992) model, the
ferrous iron formed is readily oxidized by T. ferrooxidans, where C and C0 (mol/m3) are pyrrhotite concentra-
F%S F%S
so that the concentration of ferric iron is practically tion in the solid}liquid mixture during the process and at
maintained at the initial concentration. Besides, accord- the beginning, respectively, and the term h takes into
v
ing to this leaching scheme, bacterial growth occurs not account the mineral fraction not available for reaction
only on the sul"de mineral as a solid substrate, but also with ferric iron since it is occupied by adsorbed cells.
in the liquid medium containing soluble iron. In the As concerns the ferric iron generation rate, r 3` ,
F% ,'%/
model developed here, for sulfooxidans microorganisms, due to chemical oxidation, a "rst-order kinetics is as-
the oxidation of ferrous iron is not as fast as with fer- sumed as follows:
rooxidans microorganisms. Consequently, the hypothe- r 3` "k ) C 2`"k(C 505!C 3`) (10)
sis of a constant ferric iron concentration cannot be F% ,'%/ F% F% F%
assumed and an equation for the ferrous iron chemical where k (d~1) is the "rst-order rate constant,
oxidation has to be considered. Furthermore, microor- C 2` (mol/m3) and C 505 (mol/m3) are the ferrous iron
F% F%
ganisms are assumed as not grown in solution, since they and the total iron concentrations in the liquid phase,
use as energetic substrate just the sulphide mineral and respectively.
the elemental sulfur that is formed on the mineral surface As in the Konishi et al. (1992) model, the total leaching
as a consequence of ferric iron leaching (Eq. (2)) (Boon rate of iron from pyrrhotite is comprised of the leaching
& Heijnen, 1993). Other hypotheses are the following: no rate r due to the direct bacterial action and the rate of
B
precipitate formation during bioleaching and no limita- ferric iron leaching, r :
C
tion by mass transfer rates of gaseous solutes such as dC 505
oxygen and carbon dioxide. F% "r #r (11)
dt B C
Considering these assumptions, the total growth rate
is equal to the growth rate of adsorbed bacteria, The bioleaching rate r can be related to the growth
B
R (cell/s/m3) as follows: rate R of the adsorbed bacteria, as follows:
A A
R
dX
T"R. r " A (12)
(6) B >@
dt A
where >@ (cell/mol) is the growth yield of adsorbed bac-
According to Konishi et al. (1992) model, the growth A
teria, de"ned as the ratio of the total number of cells
rate of bacteria adsorbed on the mineral surface, R , is
A formed by the bacterial growth on the solid surface to the
proportional to the product of the concentration X
a moles of solid substrate utilized.
(cell/m2) of adsorbed cells, the fraction h of adsorption
v The total concentration X of bacteria per unit volume
T
sites unoccupied by cells and the speci"c growth rate of solid}liquid mixture can be expressed in terms of the
k (d~1) (details can be found in Konishi et al., 1992).
A concentration X of cells suspended in the liquid medium
L
Furthermore, the change in ferric iron concentration (see Konishi et al., 1992 for details):
can be expressed as the sum of a generation rate, r 3` ,
F% ,'%/ K X X A
due to chemical oxidation and a consumption rate, X " A am L ) #X (13)
r 3` , due to the chemical leaching of pyrrhotite T 1#K X < L
F% ,#0/4 A L
F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795 791
By di!erentiating, the following expression is achieved: f also the parameters of chemical leaching of pyrrhotite
with ferric iron, which appear in Eq. (3), were measured
C D
A 1!a X 1
dX "K X 0 ! L dC 505 in separate leaching experiments, in the absence of
T A am < (1#K X )2 1#K X C0 F% biomass;
A L A L F%S
#dX (14) f the surface area of solid particles at the beginning
L of the process, A , was estimated as 11400 m2, from
0
Substituting Eqs. (1) and (14) in Eq. (6), Eqs. (3), (8)}(10) the speci"c surface area experimentally determined
in Eq. (7), and Eqs. (1), (3), (8), (9) and (12) in Eq. (11), the (3800 m2/kg), the solid concentration in the system
following system of three "rst-order ordinary di!erential (3%, w/v) and the reaction volume (100 ml);
equations is achieved: f the initial concentration of pyrrhotite in solution, C0 ,
F%S
was determined as 0.157 M, from the pyrrhotite con-
dX
L"f (X ,C 3`, C ) tent in the mineral ore (46%, w/w), the ore concentra-
dt 1 L F% F%505 tion (3%, w/v) and molecular weight of pyrrhotite
dC 3` (88 g/mol).
F% "f (X , C 3`, C )
dt 2 L F% F%505
Three parameters: the speci"c growth rate k , the
A
dC 505 growth yield >@ and the rate constant of ferrous iron
F% "f (X , C 3`, C ) (15) A
dt 3 L F% F%505 chemical oxidation, k, were unknown and estimated as
adjustable parameters during numerical resolution of
By integration of this system with a numerical method, system (15) by using the Runge}Kutta method. The
cell concentration, ferric iron and total iron pro"les vs. estimated values, which agreed well with the experi-
time can be determined. mental data, are the following: k "1.34$0.02 d~1,
A
>@ "3.6$0.3]1013 cells/mol, k"0.229$0.004 d~1.
A
Figs. 3 and 7 compare the experimental data with the
5. Application of the mathematical model to the predicted curves using the developed model with esti-
experimental data mated parameters. It is evident a good agreement be-
tween the experimental and the calculated values.
Parameters included in system (15) were "xed as Table 2 shows a comparison between k and >@ values
A A
follows: estimated in this work with other values found in the
literature. A value for parameter k was not found in
f K and X were measured in separate adsorption the literature, since most models have been developed
A am
experiments; for ferrooxidans microorganisms and, as a consequence,
Fig. 7. Model simulation of cell concentration in the liquid phase and adsorbed on the mineral surface. Points represent experimental cell
concentration in solution (initial ferric iron 0; mineral concentration 3 percent w/v; temperature 303C).
792 F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795
Table 2
Comparison between parameters estimated in this work and values found in the literature
ferrous iron oxidation is considered very fast with respect values was achieved by performing a sensitive analysis
to the bioleaching process. Table 2 shows that there is (Himmelblau, 1970). A 10 per cent variation imposed
a good agreement in general between values estimated in singularly to experimental data determined a maximum
this work and other values found in the literature. In variation of 0.8, 1.1 and 0.34 per cent in the estimates of
particular, parameter k is in agreement with other k , >@ and k, respectively.
A A A
values, except the one obtained with A. brierley, a ter- Considering that the chemical leaching with ferric iron
mophile microorganism which was demonstrated to be is very important in pyrrhotite bioleaching, some experi-
very e!ective in pyrite bioleaching (Konishi et al., 1995). mental tests were performed adding ferric iron at the
The con"dence helixes of parameters were estimated beginning of the process (C0 3`"100 mM and 200 mM).
F%
according to Himmelblau (1970), in order to have more Fig. 9 shows experimental iron extraction yields (points)
information on the parameters' estimation error. Fig. 8 and predicted values by the developed model (solid lines).
shows, as example, the con"dence helixe for pair k !k. It is evident, as expected, the positive e!ect of ferric
A
The dotted lines delimitate the variability region that is iron. In fact, the bioleaching rate increases as the initial
achieved considering just single parameters con"dence ferric iron concentration increases. Furthermore, the
limits. It is evident that a satisfactory variability has iron extraction yields achieved at the end of the process
been achieved. A further information on the estimated are higher in the presence of an higher ferric iron
Fig. 9. E!ect of initial ferric iron concentration on the iron extraction yields vs. time pro"le. Solid lines were calculated with the mathematical model
developed in the text. Broken lines represent data points when insoluble product was deposited on the mineral surface. Points represent experimental
data (mineral concentration 3 per cent w/v; temperature 303C).
Fig. 10. Direct and indirect mechanisms contributions in the investigated experimental conditions (see text for details).
concentration. Fig. 9 also evidences that after some presence of high ferric iron concentration (Bhatti et al.,
days of treatment experimental data signi"cantly di!er 1992).
from predicted values. This aspect might be connected Fig. 10 shows direct and indirect mechanisms contri-
to precipitation phenomena, that are favoured in the butions as calculated by the developed model, in the
794 F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795
Fig. 11. Flow diagram of a possible con"guration for pyrrhotite oxidation pretreatment.
investigated experimental conditions. The solid lines rep- merical resolution of the developed model (Fig. 10). This
resent the indirect mechanism's rate vs. time pro"les and aspect suggests a possible con"guration for pyrrhotite
they are associated to the y-axis on the left. The dotted oxidation pretreatment prior to cyanidation for gold
lines are the biological leaching rate vs. time pro"les extraction, which might be more e!ective with respect to
and are associated to the y-axis on the right. It is evident the bioleaching process. A #ow diagram of the proposed
that in all cases the indirect mechanism is signi"cantly con"guration is shown in Fig. 11. The pyrrhotite oxida-
dominant. tion takes place just through the chemical action of ferric
iron and ferrous iron is subsequently oxidized to ferric
iron in a separate biological reactor where Thiobacillus
6. Conclusions ferrooxidans has previously been inoculated. Further
study will be performed in this direction.
A kinetic study of the batch leaching of a pyrrhotite
ore by a sulfooxidans strain is reported in this work.
A mathematical model consistent with experimental data Acknowledgements
is developed, which takes into account both direct and
indirect mechanism. The development has been per- This research has been carried out with the "nancial
formed from a separate study of microorganism's adsorp- support of CNR. Authors are grateful to Mr. Marcello
tion on the solid surface and of chemical leaching of Centofanti and Dott. Silvia Di Pietro for their helpful
pyrrhotite by ferric iron. The representative equations of collaboration in the experimental work.
these phenomena (Langmuir equation and a kinetic
model with variable activation energy, respectively) have
been combined with material balances of total iron, ferric
iron and biomass. The "nal model consists of a system of References
three ordinary di!erential equations, where the indepen-
Asai, S., Konishi, Y., & Yoshida, K. (1992). Kinetic model for batch
dent variable is time and dependent variables are total bacterial dissolution of pyrite particles by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans.
iron, ferric iron and biomass concentrations in solution. Chemical Engineering Science, 47(1), 133}139.
The key parameters of the model were: the speci"c Beolchini, F., & Veglio', F. Kinetic modelling of pyrrothite ore leaching
growth rate, k , and the growth yield, >@ , of adsorbed by ferric iron and related statistical analysis. Industrial & Engineer-
A A ing Chemistry Research, in press.
bacteria, and the reaction rate constant of ferrous iron
Beolchini, F., Nardini, A., & Veglio', F. Development of a direct count
oxidation, k. These parameters were estimated by regres- method for cells determination and application in sorption of
sion analysis using a least-square algorithm during nu- Thiobacilli on pyrrhotite ore particles. Submitted for publication.
merical resolution of the di!erential equations. The Bhatti, T. M., Bigham, J. M., Carlson, L., & Touvinen, O. H. (1993).
development has been performed considering as a refer- Mineral products of pyrrhotite oxidation by Thiobacillus
ence the Konishi et al. (1992) model. In this case the ferrooxidans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59(6),
1984}1990.
model is valid for sulfooxidans microorganisms, and Boon, M., & Heijnen, J. J. (1993). Mechanisms and rate limiting steps in
this aspect represents the novelty of the mathematical bioleaching of sphalerite, chalcopyrite and pyrite with Thiobacillus
approach. ferrooxidans. In A. E Torma, J. E. Wey, & V. I. Lakshmanan,
The indirect mechanism, that is the chemical leaching Biohydrometallurgical Technologies. TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
of pyrrhotite by ferric iron, was demonstrated to be very Chang, Y. C., & Myerson, A. S. (1982). Growth models of the continu-
ous bacterial leaching of iron pyrite by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans.
important during pyrrhotite bioleaching. It was evid- Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 24, 889}902.
enced both by experimental results increasing the initial Cote, R. (1996). ATCC } bacteria and bacteriophages. Rockville,
ferric iron concentration in solution (Fig. 9) and by nu- Maryland.
F. Vegliò et al. / Chemical Engineering Science 55 (2000) 783}795 795
Duarte, J. C., Estrada, P. C., Pereira, P. C., & Beaumont, H. P. (1993). Konishi, Y., Yoshida, S., & Asai, S. (1995). Bioleaching of pyrite by
Thermophilic vs. mesophilic bioleaching process performance. acidophilic thermophile Acidianus brierleyi. Biotechnology and
FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 11, 97}102. Bioengineering, 48, 592}600.
Escobar, B., Jedlicki, E., Wiertz, J., & Vargas, T. (1996). A method for Murthy, K. S. N., & Natarajan, K. A. (1992). The role of surface
evaluating the proportion of free and attached bacteria in the attachment of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on the biooxidation of
bioleaching of chalcopyrite with Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydro- pyrite. Minerals and Metallurgical Processing, 2, 20}24.
metallurgy, 40, 1}10. Nagpal, S., Dahlstrom, D., & Oolman, T. (1994). A mathematical model
Gormely, L. S., Duncan, D. W., Branion, R. M. R., & Pinder, K. L. for the bacterial oxidation of a sul"de ore concentrate. Biotechnol-
(1975). Continuous culture of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on a ogy and Bioengineering, 43, 357}364.
zinc sul"de concentrate. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 17, Shrirari, Modak, J. M., Kumar, R., & Gandhi, K. S. (1995). Dissolution
31}49. of particles of pyrite mineral by direct attachment of Thiobacillus
Himmelblau, D. M. (1970). Process analysis by statistical methods. ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy, 38, 175}187.
. New York: Wiley. Ubaldini, S., Veglio', F., Toro, L., & Abbruzzese, C. (1995). Gold
Imai, K., Sugio, T., & Tano, T. (1970). A new method for the deter- recovery from pyrrhotite by bioleaching and cyanidation: a prelimi-
mination of the cell number of iron-oxidising bacteria in iron nary study using statistical methods. In D. S. Holmes, & R. W.
containing media. Hakko Kyokaishi (J. Ferment. Assoc. Japan), 28, Smith, Mineral Bioprocessing II. TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
42}46. Veglio', F., Nardini, A., Toro, L., Ubaldini, S., & Abbruzzese, C. (1995).
Konishi, I., Kubo, H., & Asai, S. (1992). Bioleaching of zinc sul"de Process development of pyrrhotite ore bio-oxidation for gold recov-
concentrate by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biotechnology and Bioen- ery cyanidation. In T. Vargas, C. A. Jerez, J. V. Wiertz, & H. Toledo,
gineering, 39, 66}74. Biohydrometallurgy processing. Universidad de Chile, Santiago,
Konishi, Y., Asai, S., & Katoh, H. (1990). Bacterial dissolution of Chile.
pyrite by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Bioprocess Engineering, 5, Visca, P., Bianchi, E., Polidoro, M., Buon"glio, V., Valenti, P., &
231}237. Orsi, N. (1989). A new solid medium for isolating and enumerating
Konishi, Y., Takasaka, Y., & Asai, S. (1994). Kinetics of growth and Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 35, 71}81.
elemental sulfur oxidation in batch culture of Thiobacillus Welcher, F. J., & Hahn, R. B. (1955). Semimicro qualitative analysis.
ferrooxidans. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 44, 667}673. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Company, Inc.