Resit guidelines

CRKC7025:
Module Title Tackling Global-Local Challenges in Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability

Assessment Title Portfolio Part 3 – Post Residency written assignment

Individual/Group Individual
Weighting 75%
Please upload your assignment to
Friday 4th May 2018 (23:59hrs GMT).
Latest Hand in Date
the RKC module/ course site on the resit tab.
Learning Outcomes assessed 2,3
Indicative word count 3,000

Instructions to Students for Submission of Coursework:

Following on from the residency consider:

What are the main challenges in ethics, responsibility and sustainability that I need
to tackle when I return from this module? To what extent could partnership and
leadership of place approaches enable me to address these issues? How has
experiential learning from the residency informed my practice?

You may focus on your current organisation, or your local community if you are not directly
employed at present. Draw from theory and your personal experience to develop your argument.
Ensure that you critically reflect on experiential learning gained within the Residency .

Criteria for this piece of work are below:

Module Title: CRKC7025: Tackling Global-Local Challenges in Level: 7
Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability
Assessment Title: Portfolio Part 3 – Post Residency Assignment Weighted: 75%

Criteria and 70% and above 0% - 39%

60% - 69% (Merit) 50% - 59% (Pass) 40% - 49% (Fail)
Weighting (Distinction) (Significant Fail)
Adequate exploration of
Good exploration of Poor exploration of
Excellent exploration of knowledge and theory Very weak or missing
knowledge and theory knowledge and theory
knowledge and theory relevant to the exploration of knowledge
relevant to the relevant to the
Analysis of relevant to the assignment. Analysis and theory relevant to the
assignment. Analysis and assignment. Analysis
concepts (20%) assignment. Analysis and and evaluation of assignment. Analysis and
evaluation of concepts and evaluation of
evaluation of concepts concepts lacks criticality evaluation of concepts are
are critical and fairly concepts are
are critical and insightful. and insight. non-existent.
insightful. inadequate.
Good synthesis and Adequate synthesis and Weak synthesis and
Excellent synthesis and application of relevant application of relevant application of relevant Very poor synthesis and
Application of application of relevant theory to the theory to the theory to the application of relevant
theory to post theory to the requirements of the post requirements of the requirements of the theory to the requirements
residency requirements of the post residency assignment. post residency post residency of the post residency
assignment residency assignment. The analysis is critical, assignment. The assignment. The assignment. The analysis
(30%) The analysis is critical, insightful and well analysis is appropriate analysis is weak and is inadequate and vague.
extensive, insightful and referenced. and relevant. vague.
accurately referenced.
Reflection from
Excellent reflective piece Good reflective piece of Fair reflective piece of Poor reflective piece of
residency week;
of work. The experiential work. The experiential work. The experiential work. The experiential Very weak reflective piece
application of
learning from the learning from the learning from the learning from the of work. The experiential
the experiential
residency week is residency week is residency week is in residency week isvague learning from the
learning within
critically applied to the critically applied to the part applied to the and unclear in the residency week is unclear.
the assignment
assignment. assignment. assignment. assignment.
(30%)
Fairly well written and
Well written, well-
Excellent piece of writing, structured, some Poorly written and Very weak piece of writing.
Format and structured, coherent
well-structured, coherent coherence, some structured, incoherent Incoherent and poorly
presentation; progression of argument,
progression of argument, inaccuracies in and inaccurately articulated. Inaccurately
coherence, reasonably articulated
well-articulated and referencing and minor referenced. Lacks referenced.
expression and and accurately
accurately referenced. issues with expression. appropriate introduction Lacks introduction and
accuracy of referenced. Good
Excellent introduction Appropriate and conclusion. conclusion.
references. introduction and
and conclusion. introduction and
(20%) conclusion.
conclusion.
 Module Title:
Assessment Title:
Criteria and Weighting
Quality of discussion;
structure, grasp of
theoretical concepts, rigour
of discussion on theoretical
knowledge
(10%)
Extent to which issues are
critically addressed;
relevance of issues and
solutions, critical analysis
of applied concepts
(15%)
Reflection from residency
week; application of the
experiential learning
within the assignment
(15%)
Format and Presentation;
coherence, expression and
accuracy of references.
(10%)
Business Ethics and CSR
Portfolio Part 3 – Post Residency written assignment
70% and above (Distinction)
A full range of appropriate and
critically evaluated ideas and
concepts, from a variety of
sources, have been synthesized
into the answer. Sources of ideas
are clearly identified and
referenced
A broad and varied range of
issues are critically addressed.
The answer remains focused on
the topic of the assignment
throughout and a plausible,
reasoned answer to the question
set, fully supported by
appropriate, referenced, evidence,
is provided
Excellent reflective piece of
work. The learning outcomes
from the residency week are
critically applied to the
assignment.
Excellent organization,
presentation skills and referencing
as appropriate which fully
maintains the confidence of the
reader
60% - 69% (Merit)
A good range of appropriate and
critically evaluated ideas and
concepts, from a variety of
sources, have been synthesized
into the answer. Sources of ideas
are clearly identified and
referenced
A range of issues are critically
addressed. The answer almost
always remains focused on the
topic of the assignment and a
plausible, reasoned answer to the
question set, supported by
appropriate, referenced, evidence,
is provided
Good reflective piece of work.
The learning outcomes from the
residency week are critically
applied to the assignment.
Good organization, presentation
skills and referencing as
appropriate which maintains the
confidence of the reader
Level:
Weighted:
50% - 59% (Pass)
A range of appropriate and
critically evaluated ideas and
concepts have been synthesized
into the answer. Sources of ideas
are clearly identified and
referenced
A range of issues are critically
addressed. The answer mostly
stays focused on the topic of the
assignment and a plausible
answer to the question set,
reasonably supported by
appropriate references and
evidence
Fair reflective piece of work. The
learning outcomes from the
residency week are in part applied
to the assignment.
Adequate organization,
presentation skills and referencing
as appropriate which on the whole
maintains the confidence of the
reader
7
50%
40% - 49% (Fail)
A limited range of perhaps not
entirely relevant ideas and
concepts have been evaluated and
only a limited attempt has been
made to synthesize them into the
answer. Some sources may be
unidentified and/or poorly
referenced
A range of weaknesses may on
their own or in combination lead
to a fail mark: for example, only a
limited range of issues are
addressed. There may be a lack of
criticality. The answer may stray
often from the topic of the
assignment and any answer to the
question set, may be weak and
lack support
Poor reflective piece of work. The
learning outcomes from the
residency week are vague and
unclear in the assignment.
Poor organization, presentation
skills and referencing as
appropriate such that the
confidence of the reader is
compromised
0% - 39% (Significant
Fail)
A very limited range of ideas
has been identified, there is
little criticality, evaluation or
synthesis. Sources are not
identified clearly. There may
be issues of relevance to the
problem set
A very limited range of
issues are addressed. There is
a lack of criticality. The
answer may often have little
relevance to the topic of the
assignment and any answer
to the question set, may be
weak and lack support
Very weak reflective piece of
work. The learning outcomes
from the residency week are
unclear.
Poor organization,
presentation skills and
referencing as appropriate
that fails to maintain the
confidence of the reader.