Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Night of The Scorpion and Prayer Poems
Night of The Scorpion and Prayer Poems
I watched the holy man perform his rites to tame the poison with an incantation.
After twenty hours
it lost its sting.
Alliteration - stung by a scorpion, Parting with his poison, diabolic tail in the dark, risked the rain,
poison purfiy, through and through, poured a little paraffin, flame feeding.
The Night of the Scorpion is the story of one night in which the mother of the speaker is stung by a
poisonous scorpion. She suffers for twenty hours while peasants, holy men, and her husband attempt
to heal her. They try curses, blessings, prayers, herbs, and all forms of ancient medicine that are not
practiced in most of the modern world. Their efforts are in vain. A sense of otherworldliness is created
by the beliefs and practices of these peasants in comparison to the world in which the reader is
existing, a barrier is put up. This barrier is torn down as the poem concludes and the reader realizes
how similar they are to the characters in the poem, united by their common humanity.
Throughout this piece Ezekiel makes a number of language choices that continue to reference the
movements and parts of different insects.These descriptors are very prevalent in the third stanza.He
describes the actions of the peasants as being like swarms of flies, they “buzzed” God’s name in a
hope to paralyze the “Evil One.”
The image that Ezekiel creates here is clear, the reader can easily visualize a swarm of people coming
down on the speaker’s mother, all with good intentions, but perhaps so numerous that no one can do
anything that would help. They are all devoted to the same purpose, praying in the hope of saving the
3
mother. They believe that she has been inflicted by the Evil One, or the devil, and pray in an effort to
drive him out.
The fifth paragraph, also seven lines, holds the poem’s momentum steady. The peasants wish the
scorpion to be stilled, but offer a bit of consolation for the mother. They, deep in their superstitions,
say to the mother that the poison will burn away the sins of her previous birth, and decrease the
suffering of her next. This is a reference to the traditional Hindu belief of reincarnation. Due to their
lowly social status it was believed that the mother must have committed some kind of grievous sin to
be condemned to this life, and that perhaps this suffering she is going through will improve her
chances of being reincarnated into a higher position in her next life.
This stanza continues into the next in which the speaker continues relaying the words of the peasants.
They wish that the pain the mother is experiencing will purify her flesh,
skin. The reader is then informed that all of this has been going on twenty hours. A truly painful and
horrific death.
Throughout this poem a number of different remedies are tried in an attempt to save the mother, from
what the reader can infer, none of them help. Some of these practices will surely seem absurd to a
modern reader. These references to older medicinal practices put distance between the reader and the
speaker, especially in the final line of the seventh stanza in which a
holy man perform[s] his rites to tame the poison with an / incantation.
After this distance is in place, Ezekiel swiftly breaks down the barrier to show how truly similar the
reader is, no matter where he/she is from, to the characters in the poem. They are all human and are
united by the final stanza.
My mother only said / Thank God the scorpion picked on me / And spared my children.
While once again the scorpion is spoken about as if it chose to kill the mother, the mother’s dedication
and pure love for her children breaches the gap between the characters in the poem and any reader.
All can empathize with the love felt for a child, mother or father. This woman, although distant, living
in a different time and place, is just as human and real as anyone reading the poem.
Nassim Ezekial was born in Bombay in 1924 as part of Bombay’s Jewish community. He attended
Wilson College in Mumbai and received a BA in Literature. After graduating he taught English
literature, and continued his studies at Birkbeck College, London where he studied Philosophy. He
was married, and published his first collection of poetry in in 1952, The Bad Day. Another book, The
Dead Man, was published in 1960. His career also included working in the publication industry, as a
critic at The Names of India and editor of Poetry India. He also held a number of professorial
positions at the University of Leeds and University of Pondicherry. He would receive the Padmashri
award by the President of India in 1988. He died in January of 2004 at 79 years old.
The poem is spatial, i.e. according to geographical space, set against the back drop of an Indian
village. The time is night and the climate is wet after a shower of ten hours. Temporally, i.e. according
to time, the poem is a reminiscence of the poet’s childhood. The tone of the poem though in a very
innocent way brings out the inherent irony in the poem. Here the mood of the poet is not directly
satirical but indirectly very biting and scathing. In the garb of innocence, the poet simply brings out
the complex bent of mind of the simple village folk. There is hardly any anger visible on the surface
but inside the poet seethes with rage at the ignorance and stupidity of the village folk including his
father. This is the characteristic detached way of Ezekiel’s satire where he says so much without
5
making a big effort. The fact that the satire involves his mother, who is the helpless victim of the
stupidity of the people, does not make the poem any subjective. Which itself becomes a point of
cruelty to us. We might chide the poet for his apparent detachment from the whole episode where he
claims that his mother was in great pain. However, we can also defend the poet by saying that the
event took place way back in his childhood and thus has lost its personal touch. However, when we
re-read the poem the anger that is present becomes easily apparent. The apparent innocence of the
narrative also undercuts the mock seriousness of the mythical and philosophical mumbo jumbo of the
poem where incarnation and reincarnations are talked of. The poem mocks in its narrative the over
dependence of the common people on divinity for anything and everything. And yet finally, the
solemnness of the poem is confirmed in the last lines of the poem where the mother wishes for the
pain of the children.
PRAYER
Imtiaz Dharker
Prayer” is another poem of discrimination against women. The scene is set outside the mosque where
the observer, perhaps the poetess herself, is denied entry. She expresses her strong resentment against
man’s writ which runs large here also in the house of God and He has also yielded to man’s dictate.
We are told that “The place is full of worshippers”, all poor; their sandals with soles, heels and thongs
“forming a perfect pattern of need” are ragged and mended many times. They are thrown together in a
heap –
They appear to be the hopeful prayers of the poor. The observer is quite ironical when she questions
out of sheer curiosity –
and-
The answer to this question lies in not saying anything and the message is conveyed in willful and
tactical silence, in the subtle irony of the question itself.
Imtiaz Dharker (1954-) lives with the passion of an undaunted rebel, not to retreat and not to fail. The
intensity and eloquence of her life and poetic accomplishment have dumbfounded the male-
chauvinists and have left her female counterparts in soaring spirits not only inside the Islamic social,
cultural and religious setup but also outside it. That is why her life and poetry make a fascinating
study in the crushing indictment of the suppressive prescriptions against the freedom, dignity and
respectful living of women, especially in the Muslim society. Imtiaz confirms our convictions that
socio-cultural and socio-religious restrictions on women have robbed them of all their potentialities
leaving them not only physically and mentally handicapped but also psychological wrecks age after
age. The lived experiences of Imtiaz have been honestly expressed in her poetry with the courage of
conviction. Her humanistic and feministic concerns with her anguish and agony, sympathy and protest
give the message silently, though its deafening explosion has been felt everywhere. That is the reason
that her rebellion has caused a flutter in the petticoats of the guardians of orthodox religion,
custodians of culture and the pettifogging politicians. The substance, spirit and style of her daily
living hold everyone to sway.