Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/321060401

Crabs Diversity of Digha Coast, West Bengal, India

Article · November 2017


DOI: 10.1007/s12595-017-0251-x

CITATION READS

1 1,972

8 authors, including:

Bidhan Chandra Patra Manojit Bhattacharya


Vidyasagar University Fakir Mohan University
87 PUBLICATIONS   479 CITATIONS    56 PUBLICATIONS   136 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Avijit Kar Basanta Kumar Das


Vidyasagar University Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture
29 PUBLICATIONS   35 CITATIONS    292 PUBLICATIONS   2,868 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Bioactive potential accessment of Bacillus species isolated from Bhitarkanika mangrove forest View project

Development of Standard Protocols and Molecular Tools for Fish Food Authentication for Food Safety and Quality Assurance (funded by FSSAI, Ministry of Health &
Family Welfare, Govt of India) View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Avijit Kar on 15 November 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


GI C AL
LO S
O

O
O

CI E
TH E Z
Proc Zool Soc

TY
DOI 10.1007/s12595-017-0251-x KO
L K ATA

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Crabs Diversity of Digha Coast, West Bengal, India


Bidhan Chandra Patra1 • Manojit Bhattacharya2 • Avijit Kar1 • Basanta Kumar Das2 •

Swagat Ghosh3 • Srikanta Parua1 • Shampa Patra4 • Sudip Rakshit1

Received: 21 February 2017 / Revised: 16 September 2017 / Accepted: 6 November 2017


Ó Zoological Society, Kolkata, India 2017

Abstract A survey was conducted during the period Introduction


of April-2014–April-2016 to note the occurrence of crabs
in the beach area of Digha (21°370 48.09200 N Among benthic communities, crustaceans play a signifi-
87°320 41.35500 E to 21°360 9.89600 N 87°270 44.09800 E) at the cant role in regulating the structure and function of tropical
Bay of Bengal coastal zone, India. A total of 55 species of ecosystems (Hendrickx 1995). Marine crabs are wide-
crabs belonging to 24 genera and 13 families have been spread in reef environments as well as in shallow shores
recorded during the study period. From the data it is evi- and intertidal regions. Because of high protein and mineral
dent that the crabs belonging to the family Ocypodidae are crabs are not only nutritious but also a superior source of
dominant group (28%). income of the people residing in coastal areas (Kathirvel
1983; Boßelmann et al. 2007). Skeleton of crabs are
Keywords Crab diversity  Digha coast  Bay of Bengal powdered to use as an ingredient in poultry feeds.
Accordingly crabs, irrespective of habitats have drawn the
attention of various workers (Woods 1993; Sleinis and
Silvey 1980; Ramakrishna and Talukdar 2003; Ng et al.
2008; Chatterjee et al. 2014; Mandal et al. 2015). The aim
of the present survey was to note the crab species occurring
in the Digha beach of the Bay of Bengal with a view to
protect them from the regular, non-stop anthropogenic
Bidhan Chandra Patra, Manojit Bhattacharya and Avijit Kar have
contributed equally to this work. activities of the tourists.

& Bidhan Chandra Patra


patrabidhan1962@gmail.com Material and Method
1
Centre For Aquaculture Research, Extension and Livelihood,
Department of Aquaculture Management and Technology, Study Area
Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, West Bengal 721102,
India Digha coast is located in the Purba Medinipur district of West
2
ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Bengal, India. It is stretched from the mouth of the Sub-
Monirampur (Post), Barrackpore, Kolkata, West Bengal arnarekha River to old Digha, up to Mohana. The total length
700120, India
of study area was around 9 km including the Talsari delta
3
Sasya Shyamala Krishi Vigyan Kendra, IRDM Faculty located at Jaleswar district of Odisha state, India. This area lies
Centre, Arapanch Sonarpur, Ramakrishna Mission
between Digha-Mohana 21°370 48.09200 N 87°320 41.35500 E
Vivekananda University, Kolkata, West Bengal 700150,
India and Talsari 21°360 9.89600 N 87°270 44.09800 E (Fig. 1). The
4 muddy and sandy beaches of Digha shore provide a suit-
Department of Zoology, Sabang Sajani Kanta
Mahavidyalaya, Lutunia, West Midnapore, West Bengal able habitat for the crabs. Talsari area is placed between
721166, India spring-tide and neap-tide level and it is characterized by

123
Proc Zool Soc

Fig. 1 Site of the study area

123
Proc Zool Soc

Order wise species distribution 2002). The taxonomic status of crabs was adopted from
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS 2016). Bio-
5% diversity assessment and conservation status of the speci-
men were designed through the International Union for
Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Red List
guidelines (IUCN 2017-1).
Decapoda

Xiphosurida

Results
95%

During the period of the 2 years we had the opportunity to


record 55 species of crabs belonging to two Orders
Fig. 2 Order wise species distribution of crab diversity at Digha (Table 1). Of these, decapods were dominant (95%) while
coast, India xiphosurids were only 5% (Fig. 2). Figure 3 represents the
data in respect to the occurrence of crabs belonging to
shallow and swampy muddy environment. The study was also different families. It is evident that most of the crab species
continued in the deep sea area through mechanized fishing belong to the NE (71%) while DD (27%) and LR/nt (2%)
vessels. were next in order (Fig. 4).

Collection of Crab Samples


Discussion
Sampling of crabs was carried out from the middle of
April, 2014 to the end of April 2016 fortnightly. Other than It appears from our survey that there exists at least 55
beach area we visited the marshy areas of the shoreline crab species which are distributed in 24 genera and 13
especially the intertidal zones. Generally wandering crabs families in the Digha beach area of the Bay of Bengal.
were captured by hand whereas burrowing crabs were Out of these only 13 species are edible by human. It is
collected through the effective use of the iron sticks which found that Uca sp. are most common in sea shore where
are used by the crab catchers. Ocypoda macrocera commonly known as red crabs are
also found in large numbers. Because crabs are consumed
Laboratory Procedure and Identification by a large section of people and act as commodity to earn
foreign currency. They are being captured by local crab
The collected specimens were identified by using the keys fishermen indiscriminately, irrespective of size, weight
and portal website (www.species-identification.org) and age (Sukumaran and Neelakantan 1996). The ghost
(Guerao and Rotllant 2009; Jeyabaskaran and Wafar crabs (Ocypode macrocera) preferred peaceful area for

Table 1 Crab species occurring in Digha coast, West Bengal, India


Serial Order Family Name IUCN Edible/non-
no. status edible

1. Decapoda Diogenidae Diogenes custos (Fabricius, 1798) NE Non-edible


2. Diogenes miles (Fabricius, 1787) DD Edible
3. Diogenes planimanus (Henderson, 1893) DD Non-edible
4. Diogenes avarus (Heller, 1865) NE Non-edible
5. Diogenes rectimanus (Miers, 1884) DD Non-edible
6. Diogenes costatus (Henderson, 1893) DD Non-edible
7. Diogenes investigatoris (Alcock, 1905) NE Non-edible
8. Dardanus hessii (Miers, 1884) NE Non-edible
9. Clibanarius padavensis (de Man, 1888) NE Non-edible
10. Clibanarius clibanarius (Herbst, 1791) NE Non-edible
11. Clibanarius infraspinatus (Hilgendorf, 1869) NE Non-edible
12. Clibanarius olivaceus (Henderson, 1915) DD Non-edible
13. Varunidae Varuna litterata (Fabricius, 1798) NE Edible

123
Proc Zool Soc

Table 1 continued
Serial Order Family Name IUCN Edible/non-
no. status edible

14. Portunidae Portunus (Portunus) sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) NE Edible


15. Portunus (Portunus) pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) NE Edible
16. Portunus (Monomia) argentatus (A. Milne-Edwards, 1861) NE Edible
17. Portumnus latipes (Pennant, 1777) NE Edible
18. Charybdis (Charybdis) affinis (Dana, 1852) NE Edible
19. Charybdis (Charybdis) lucifera (Fabricius, 1798) NE Edible
20. Charybdis (Gonioneptunus) quadrimaculata (Yang, Chen and DD Edible
Dai 2011)
21. Charybdis (Charybdis) feriata (Linnaeus, 1758) NE Edible
22. Charybdis (Goniosupradens) acutifrons (de Man, 1879) DD Edible
23. Scylla serrata (Forskål, 1775) NE Edible
24. Thalamita prymna (Herbst, 1803) NE Non-edible
25. Ocypodidae Ocypode macrocera (H. Milne Edwards, 1852) DD Non-edible
26. Ocypode pallidula (Jacquinot, 1846) NE Non-edible
27. Ocypode quadrata (Fabricius, 1787) NE Non-edible
28. Uca (Paraleptuca) crassipes (White, 1847) NE Non-edible
29. Uca (Gelasimus) tetragonon (Herbst, 1790) NE Non-edible
30. Uca (Tubuca) typhoni Crane, 1975 DD Non-edible
31. Uca (Austruca) perplexa (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) NE Non-edible
32. Uca (Gelasimus) vocans (Linnaeus, 1758) NE Non-edible
33. Uca (Tubuca) forcipata (Adams & White, 1849) NE Non-edible
34. Uca (Tubuca) rosea (Tweedie, 1937) NE Non-edible
35. Uca (Tubuca) demani (Ortmann, 1897) DD Non-edible
36. Uca (Tubuca) paradussumieri (Bott, 1973) NE Non-edible
37. Ocypode ceratophthalmus (Pallas, 1772) NE Non-edible
38. Uca (Austruca) triangularis (A. Milne-Edwards, 1873) NE Non-edible
39. Uca (Austruca) lactea (De Haan, 1835) NE Non-edible
40. Macrophthalmidae Macrophthalmus (Macrophthalmus) transversus (Latreille, 1817) DD Non-edible
41. Macrophthalmus (Macrophthalmus) sulcatus H. Milne Edwards, DD Non-edible
1852
42. Venitus dentipes (Lucas, in Guérin-Méneville, 1836) DD Non-edible
43. Macrophthalmus (Mareotis) depressus (Rüppell, 1830) NE Non-edible
44. Coenobitidae Coenobita cavipes (Stimpson, 1858) NE Non-edible
45. Coenobita clypeatus (Fabricius, 1787) NE Non-edible
46. Grapsidae Grapsus grapsus (Linnaeus, 1758) NE Non-edible
47. Pachygrapsus crassipes Randall, 1840 NE Non-edible
48. Dorippidae Dorippoides facchino (Herbst, 1785) NE Non-edible
49. Matutidae Matuta victor (Fabricius, 1781) NE Edible
50. Calappidae Calappa lophos (Herbst, 1782) NE Non-edible
51. Trapeziidae Trapezia tigrina Eydoux & Souleyet, 1842 NE Non-edible
52. Dromiidae Dromia dormia (Linnaeus) NE Non-edible
53. Xiphosurida Limulidae Tachypleus gigas (O. F. Müller, 1785) DD Non-edible
54. Limulus polyphemus (Linnaeus, 1758) LR/nt Non-edible
55. Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda (Latreille, 1802) DD Non-edible
NE not evaluated, DD data deficient, LR/nt lower risk near threaten

123
Proc Zool Soc

Fig. 3 Family wise species Family wise species distribution


distribution of crab diversity at
Digha coast, India
Diogenidae
2% 2%
2% 2% 2% Portunidae
5%
2% 22% Ocypodidae
4%
Macrophthalmidae
3%
Coenobitidae
7% Grapsidae
20% Dorippidae
Matutidae
27% Calappidae
Trapeziidae
Dromiidae
Limulidae
Varunidae

American lobster Homarus americanus and the edible crab


Biodiversity assessment Cancer pagurus. Thermochimica Acta 463(1): 65–68.
Chatterjee, S., T.K. Das, and S.K. Chakraborty. 2014. Reproductive
2% biology and bioturbatory activities of two sympatric species of
Fiddler crabs Uca lactea annulipes and Uca triangularis bengali
27% (Decopada: Ocypodidae) at the East Midnapore Coastal Belt of
West Bengal. India Journal of Biology and Life Science 5: 106–127.
Guerao, G., and G. Rotllant. 2009. Post-larval development and
sexual dimorphism of the spider crab Maja brachydactyla
NE
71% (Brachyura: Majidae). Scientia Marina 73(4): 797–808.
DD Hendrickx, M.E. 1995. Checklist of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea:
LR/nt Decapoda) from the eastern tropical Pacific. Bulletin de l’Institut
royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Biologie 65: 125–150.
http://www.cmfri.org.in/uploads/divfiles/Landings-FY-2013-14_final.
NE- Not Evaluated; DD- Data Deficient; LR/nt- Lower Risk Near Threaten pdf. Accessed 26 August 2016.
Jeyabaskaran, R., and M. Wafar. 2002. CD on brachyuran crabs of west
Fig. 4 Biodiversity assessment based on IUCN status of crab coast. Dona Paula, Goa: India National Institute of Oceanography.
occurring in Digha coast, India Kathirvel, M. 1983. Crab resources and prospects for crab culture.
CMFRI Bulletin 34: 66–68.
their shelter. Therefore, these were seen occasionally in Mandal, B., P. Payra, and R. Samanta. 2015. Seasonal availability of
the areas where tourists are commonly seen in contrast to crabs and their distribution in Digha coast. International
the areas which are less frequently visited by the tourists, Research Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 1: 27–30.
especially the beach of Talsari area. Thus, it appears that, Ng, P.K., D. Guinot, and P.J. Davie. 2008. Systema Brachyurorum:
Part I. An annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the
a proper management strategy is inevitable to save the world. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 17(1): 1–286.
shore-crabs as they are being threatened seriously by the Ramakrishna, S.J., and S. Talukdar. 2003. Marine invertebrates of
tourists. Digha coast and some recommendations on their conservation.
Records of the Zoological Survey of India 101: 1–298.
Acknowledgements Authors are highly thankful to Natural Sleinis, S., and G.E. Silvey. 1980. Locomotion in a forward walking
Resources Data Management System (NRDMS), Department of crab. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology,
Science and Technology (DST), Government of India for financial Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 136(4): 301–312.
assistance to carry out the research work (Project Ref. No. NRDMS/ Sukumaran, K., and B. Neelakantan. 1996. Mortality and stock
11/1966/012). assessment of two marine portunid crabs, Portunus (Portunus)
sanguinolentus (Herbst) and Portunus (Portunus) pelagicus
Compliance with Ethical Standards (Linnaeus) along the southwest coast of India. Indian Journal
of Fisheries 43: 225–240.
Conflicts of interest Authors declare no conflicts of interest. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2017-1.
www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 30 June 2017.
Woods, C.M. 1993. Natural diet of the crab Notomithrax ursus
(Brachyura: Majidae) at Oaro, South Island, New Zealand. New
References Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 27: 309–315.
WoRMS Editorial Board. 2016. World Register of Marine Species.
Boßelmann, F., P. Romano, H. Fabritius, D. Raabe, and M. Epple. http://www.marinespecies.org at VLIZ. Accessed 02 September
2007. The composition of the exoskeleton of two crustacea: The 2016.

123

View publication stats

You might also like