Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rating For Title Defense

    Uploaded by

    Lorianne Arcueno
    22 views1 page
    The document outlines criteria and indicators for evaluating a quantitative research title defense presentation. It will be evaluated based on clarity, coherence and creativity. Specifically, the research topic should be relevant to the students' track/strand and level, and present an innovative idea or process. The research question should be focused and the paper cohesive. The scope and introduction should clearly address a gap in existing research.

    Original Description:

    as reference

    Original Title

    Rating for title defense

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines criteria and indicators for evaluating a quantitative research title defense presentation. It will be evaluated based on clarity, coherence and creativity. Specifically, the research topic should be relevant to the students' track/strand and level, and present an innovative idea or process. The research question should be focused and the paper cohesive. The scope and introduction should clearly address a gap in existing research.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    22 views1 page

    Rating For Title Defense

    Uploaded by

    Lorianne Arcueno
    The document outlines criteria and indicators for evaluating a quantitative research title defense presentation. It will be evaluated based on clarity, coherence and creativity. Specifically, the research topic should be relevant to the students' track/strand and level, and present an innovative idea or process. The research question should be focused and the paper cohesive. The scope and introduction should clearly address a gap in existing research.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH)

    TITLE DEFENSE

    GROUP: GRADE AND SECTION:

    CRITERIA INDICATORS OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY FAIR

    Clarity, Coherence, and Creativity -The research is relevant to the SHS track/strand
    (30 points) that the research team belong to.
    -The research topic is appropriate to the level of researchers.
    -The research topic or idea is innovative, or present an
    innovative process to understanding a rather common area
    of research.
    -The chosen research topic as reflected by the stated research
    question (or objective) is focused.
    -The paper, in its entirely, has been written to form a
    cohesive whole.
    -The scope and delimitation of the study is clear and
    appropriate to the level of the students.
    -The introduction (or background of the study) clearly presents
    the gap in research addressed by the study.

    You might also like