Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CVEN40620 Assignment 1 (19 - 20)
CVEN40620 Assignment 1 (19 - 20)
CVEN40620 Assignment 1 (19 - 20)
1. A continuously recording rain gauge produced the following data for a storm that lasted 120 minutes:
Time
5 10 20 30 35 45 60 80 100 120
(mins)
Cumulative
rainfall 2.5 7.5 21.6 35.1 45.2 60.3 71.5 80.7 92.3 100.5
(mm)
(a) Determine the maximum rainfall intensities for 5, 10, 20 and 60-minute durations.
(b) Use the following Intensity-Duration-Frequency curves to estimate the return periods for the
intensities computed in (a).
2. A 95 km2 catchment has four rain gauge stations, A to D. The annual rainfall for the year 2002 at the
four stations together with their associated Thiessen polygon areas is given below. Also given in the
table are the February rainfall totals for A, B and D.
Station A B C D
Annual rainfall (mm) 1830 1980 2150 1640
Thiessen polygon areas (km2) 20 35 28 12
February rainfall (mm) 122 105 ? 136
(a) Estimate the missing February data at Station C. Outline the assumptions which underpin your
analyses.
(b) Using the Thiessen polygon method, estimate the average February and annual rainfall in the
catchment for the year 2002.
3. Five stations provide rainfall estimates in the vicinity of Mullingar, Co. Westmeath. The grid
references of the stations are shown in the diagram below.
Recorded rainfalls at Stations A, B, C and D for a storm are 55.3 mm 62.1 mm, 49.8 mm and 51.6 mm
respectively. Compare the estimated rainfall at Station X for this storm using the arithmetic averaging
and inverse distance weighting methods.
Note:
The area of Ireland is divided into 25 squares, measuring 100 by 100 km, each identified by a single
letter. Within each square, eastings and northings from the origin (south west corner) of the square are
given numerically. It is common to indicate a location in each square using a six figure grid reference,
employing three digits in each ordinate to determine a 100 m square. Higher resolution locations can
be identified using 5 digits in each ordinate, determining a 1 m square.
4. Daily rainfall totals at Station 1for three consecutive days in February 2007 are shown in the table
below.
Station 11th February 2007 12th February 2007 13th February 2008
1 65.3 80.8 1.1
Hourly rainfall data at a nearby station (Station 2) is given in the following table for the period from the
10th February to the 12th February, 2007.
Hours Station 2
10th Feb 2007 11th Feb 2007 12th Feb 2007
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
5 0 0 0
6 0 0 0
7 3 1.7 0
8 0 9 0
9 0 2.3 0.5
10 0.9 0 0.4
11 0 1.5 0.1
12 0 5.5 0
13 0 0 0
14 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
16 0 2.5 0.3
17 0.2 1.5 0.4
18 2.1 0.8 0.3
19 0.7 3.4 0
20 0.3 0.6 0
21 0.1 2.5 0
22 0.1 0 0
23 4.7 0 0
24 0 0 0
By analyzing mass curves of rainfall at Station 2, disaggregate the daily rainfall at Station 1into hourly
values.
5. Annual precipitation at rain gauge A and the average annual precipitation at twenty surrounding rain
gauges are given below: