Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Raneti Vs Romania at ECHR PDF
Raneti Vs Romania at ECHR PDF
Raneti Vs Romania at ECHR PDF
Application Form
Warning: If your application is incomplete, it will not be accepted
(see Rule 47 of the Rules of Court). Please note in particular that
About this application form Rule 47 § 2 (a) requires that a concise statement of facts,
This form is a formal legal document and may affect your rights complaints and information about compliance with the
and obligations. Please follow the instructions given in the “Notes admissibility criteria MUST be on the relevant parts of the
for filling in the application form”. Make sure you fill in all the application form itself. The completed form should enable the
fields applicable to your situation and provide all relevant Court to determine the nature and scope of the application
documents. without recourse to any other submissions.
A. The applicant
A.1. Individual A.2. Organisation
This section refers to applicants who are individual persons only. This section should only be filled in where the applicant is a
If the applicant is an organisation, please go to section A.2. company, NGO, association or other legal entity. In this case,
please also fill in section D.1.
2. First name(s)
Tudor-Andrei 11. Identification number (if any)
3. Date of birth
1 0 1 0 1 9 8 0 e.g. 31/12/1960 12. Date of registration or incorporation (if any)
D D M M Y Y Y Y
e.g. 27/09/2012
4. Place of birth D D M M Y Y Y Y
Focsani, Vrancea, Romania 13. Activity
5. Nationality
Romanian 14. Registered address
6. Address
bd. Unirii 28, ap. 5, Focsani, Vrancea, Romania
BIH - Bosnia and Herzegovina MKD - "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
ISL - Iceland
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 3 / 13
23. Telephone (including international dialling code) 30. Telephone (including international dialling code)
+40743003433
24. Fax 31. Fax
C.3. Authority
The applicant must authorise any representative to act on his or her behalf by signing the first box below; the designated
representative must indicate his or her acceptance by signing the second box below.
I hereby authorise the person indicated above to represent me in the proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights
concerning my application lodged under Article 34 of the Convention.
0 6 1 1 2 0 1 7 e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y
I hereby agree to represent the applicant in the proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights concerning the application
lodged under Article 34 of the Convention.
e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 4 / 13
41. Address
42. Telephone (including international dialling code) 49. Telephone (including international dialling code)
D.3. Authority
The representative of the applicant organisation must authorise any lawyer to act on its behalf by signing the first box below; the
lawyer must indicate his or her acceptance by signing the second box below.
I hereby authorise the person indicated in section D.2 above to represent the organisation in the proceedings before the European
Court of Human Rights concerning the application lodged under Article 34 of the Convention.
e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y
I hereby agree to represent the organisation in the proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights concerning the application
lodged under Article 34 of the Convention.
e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 5 / 13
Nature of urgency: flagrant breaking of the articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 17 from the Convention meaning
as most relevant, certainty of illegal loss of freedom, risk to life or of torture, inhuman or degrading punishment or
treatment, ill-treatment or other serious harm, risk of social exclusion, risk of a flagrant denial of justice, risk to private and
family life, health and conditions of detention, right to a fair trial and legal representation and others
Facts. Also see explanatory notes in annex 23 about the background and short proofs about this criminal activity.
On 10th September.2015 a mandate of detainment was falsified in 10547/231/2015 which was executed on 17th
September 2015, 6 a.m., by 4 masked policemen and 2 policemen who broke into my home and detained me illegally and
unjustified. I was harassed 6 hours while no acts of procedure were effectuated as required by the law, and then I was
held for the 7th hour at Vrancea county's psychiatric forensic service for nothing. See annex 1
On 22nd September 2015 the “prosecutor” from 2417/P/2014 threatened my mother on her mobile phone that if she
doesn’t convince me to voluntarily commit myself psychiatrically he will falsify an obligatory psychiatric commitment, and
indeed he proposed and got a falsified decision in 11224/231/1015 that I be psychiatrically committed. See annex 2
On 28th October 2015 the falsified decision in 11224/231/2015 was annulled as unfounded at Vrancea county's
Tribunal after I made an appeal. See annex 3
On 30th October 2015 the “prosecutor” from 2417/P/2014 after losing in 11224/231/2015 made an address at Vrancea
psychiatric forensic service who on 03rd December 2015 falsified a psychiatric report in my absence. The report instead of
the conclusion contains the presumption that ~”I’m most probably paranoid (lie) ... having no discernment (lie) ... because
I have superior studies, fast thinking and general culture (?) ... and judicial history (lie) ... and I’m violent (lie)”. See annex 4
On 9th December 2015 using this falsified psychiatric report the “prosecutor” from 2417/P/2014 proposed illegally that
I must be obligated to psychiatric medical treatment, in dossier 14277/231/2015. See annex 5
On 11th December 2015 I was illegally detained by the “judge” in 14277/231/2015 3 hours using 2 gendarmes who took
me illegally by force from my home again, not receiving a subpoena before as legally required so they impede me building
a defense by bringing me to the courthouse in the last possible moment. See annex 6
On 5th February 2016 the proposal was annulled in 14277/231/2015 as inadmissible. See annex 5, last page
On 10th February 2016 another “prosecutor” falsified an appeal in 14277/231/2015. See annex 7
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 6 / 13
Following this falsified decision, the Romanian “authorities” are “obligated” to commit me psychiatrically indefinitely to
life and poison me, that is they aren’t obligated by the law to obey an unlawful, unfounded and criminal order for Torture,
Crimes against humanity, Bodily harming and attempted Qualified murder which they are obligated to report to the penal
authorities actually, but since they already didn't obviously they will commit these crimes because they are as proved a
veritable organized crime group. To achieve this they can arrest me anywhere by falsifying the necessary documents
reason for which I’ve gone into permanent hiding from this criminal regime, thanks to ECHR and EU who protects this
murderous totalitarian regime as proven by the illegal and repeated destroying of my urgent requests for interim
measures that illustrate the reality of the mafia state in Romania as ex-president Traian Basescu put it
In conclusion, the need for urgent judgment and interim measures as I proposed - see annex 23 section V regarding
explanatory notes, is that this criminal “magistrate” group can anytime imprison me illegally and unfounded, indefinitely
to life by committing me psychiatrically based on the falsified decision from 11th October 2017 from 12718/231/2018, for
the purpose of torturing me by harming me gravely or murdering me by poisoning with Invega fluorine neurotoxin, no
matter how many trials I win or what national judicial and administrative remedies I try, therefore
1. the unconstitutional law must be modified or repealed so it doesn't target suspects and the accused anymore
infringing on the presumption of innocence, so it thwarts the magistrate organized crime using quasi-legal procedures to
cover up their atrocious crimes of drugging innocent people as I've denounced and proved publicly they do. I mention as
proof they are protecting their illegal cover-up stories illegally rejected my requests for the Romanian Constitutional Court
for the unconstitutional articles against the presumption of innocence to be repealed, as annexes prove about more that
one dossier
2. a law for defining clearer that magistrates answer penally, civilly and disciplinarily for their crimes must be instated
I mention in annex 23 section II I’ve also made a short description of the urgency, and
in annex 23 section III I’ve made a short description of my pecuniary / non-pecuniary damage claims
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 8 / 13
F. Statement of alleged violation(s) of the Convention and/or Protocols and relevant arguments
59. Article invoked Explanation
Article 1 Romania infringed on all of the following articles
Article 2 Because they’ve instigated an interloper to kill me on 27.October.2014 and
05.December.2014, and because they attempted to illegally commit me psychiatrically
three times and poison me since 2014, I legitimately fear that they intentionally seek to
silence me by gravely harming me or killing me. Between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017 they illegally committed me psychiatrically and unjustified injected me with
Haloperidol and Diazepam and obligated me by threat of violence to take Prazolex and
the fluorine based neurotoxin Invega which claims is treats schizophrenia (but causes it
being a neurotoxin) despite I was never diagnosed with it (see annex 16). On 11th
October 2017 they falsified the decision in 12718/231/2017, their final solution to
imprison me indefinitely to life and torture me by harming me gravely or murder me by
poisoning me with fluorine neurotoxin Invega as they did to prisoners of war in gulags
or concentrations camps
Article 3 Masked policemen, regular policemen and gendarmes repeatedly broke into my
home illegally using falsified mandates which constitutes acts of terrorism in
conjuncture with the psychiatrically profiled falsified acts of procedure, which caused
me for years anxiety, grief and fear for my health and life which degraded the quality of
my life and my intellectual ability as they apparently intended to harass, threaten and
blackmail me to renounce justice, but in actuality they intended as proven to silence me
by gravely harming me or murdering me, as proven from the start by the interloper they
instigated to kill me, and as proven when I’ve been illegally arrested on 27th May 2017
from my law faculty exams, tied me up and illegally, unfounded, against my consent and
using violence poisoned me with fluorine / chlorine based neurotoxins Haloperidol,
Diazepam, Prazolex and Invega for schizophrenia despite the fact I wasn’t diagnosed
with it nor was there ever a factual justification – see annex 16, in fact poisoning me as
they did to prisoners of war in gulags or concentrations camps, applying the procedure
for killers even. Ultimately this murderous regime proven their murderous intent to
imprison me indefinitely to life and torture me to gravely harm me or kil me with Invega
poisoning to silence me, through falsified decision in 12718/231/2017. See annex 19
Article 5 (a-b) are not applicable because I was repeatedly deprived of liberty illegally as I’ve
proven in annex 23 section I regarding explanatory notes
Article 6 My right to my defense was infringed by the “judge” in 4909/231/2017 who said
~“I’m restricting your right to defend yourself”, also not allowing me to consult file
4909/231/2017 by falsifying a mandate of detainment before sending me a subpoena to
not allow me to build a defense by having the 7 gendarmes and 2 unknown persons
who detained me illegally on 10.April.2017 bring me to the last moment in court, and
who even stole two pencils so I don’t write things down. Even my state lawyer pleaded
against me saying ne bis idem (with 11224/231/2015) expires in time. I mention I was
also denied the right to consult penal files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
from which 4909/231/2017 originates, as well as 2417/P/2014. This particularly
infringes on article 6 paragraph 3 letter b from the Convention, while all the
psychiatrically profiled acts of procedure against me infringe on the presumption of
innocence according to article 6 paragraph 2 from the Convention as well as the falsified
prosecutor’s ordinances, and the fact I wasn’t indicted and convicted in 30-60 days as
normal as according to Romanian Law 304/2004 and Romanian OUG 27/2002 infringes
on my right to have a judiciary process in a reasonable time. Because I had to go into
hiding I also couldn't defend myself in the final solution mafia dossier 12718/231/2017,
not that it mattered as it would've been falsified anyway as 4909/231/2017 was. I
received no actual defence from the state lawyers and I mention I mandated my mother
who told me she didn't see any medical files and saw testimonies who were hidden
from me as I expected, reason for which I was denied the right to receive scanned
copies of the entire penal files, testimonies which are useless because they haven't
been communicated to me according to the contradictoriality ("adversarial") principle,
and because if false they contradict themselves with the material proof of the audio
recording of the courthouse which I actually managed to obtain
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 9 / 13
Statement of alleged violation(s) of the Convention and/or Protocols and relevant arguments (continued)
60. Article invoked Explanation
“fair” means legal and the “judge” in 4909/231/2017 broke every relevant law as he
did in 4791/231/2017 and 10547/231/2015, and as the one in 11224/231/2015 did,
even lying that my request of his removal for incompatibility reasons regarding him
falsifying the mandates from 05.April.2017 from 4791/231/2017 and the one executed
on 10.April.2017 (same day) from 4909/231/2017, was already judged before I made
the request which is of course absurd, the “judge” thus breaking the principle nemo
esse iudex in sua causa potest rejecting the request regarding his own incompatibility
“hearing” means both the right to plea in my defense which I wasn’t allowed, and the
motivated admission / rejection of my proofs which these “magistrates” never do, and
“impartial” means by a judge who obeys the law exclusively, but I proven beyond any
reasonable doubt that the “judge” in 4909/231/2017 doesn’t obey the law but criminal
orders. The same lack of impartiality problem appeared in all the other files and
dossiers I mentioned - not a single judge obeys the law in Romania from my experience,
not even in the cases I “won”
In 4909/231/2017 appeal a "judge" demanded that I prove I'm not mentally
alienated infringing on my presumption of innocence as the "judge" used the old
argument "prove I'm not the devil" from medieval witch hunts. See annex 13
Article 7 So called judicial functionaries in 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
accused me of fictive facts that obviously never constitute penal offences, and in 2417/
P/2014 wasn’t even suspected of a real penal offense, thus all the acts of procedure
were therefore falsified. If the penal offenses were flagrant as they claim, I would've
been convicted in 30-60 days according to the law, but I have never been indicted and
convicted, as proven by annex 17
Article 8 The so-called magistrates broke the law by falsifying the mandates for my
detainment and illegally breaking into my mother’s home, which also constitutes the
penal offence of property violation. These “magistrates” deliberately did this to disturb
my family from spending orthodox Easter, arresting me illegally and repeatedly on
06.April.2017, 10.April.2017 then attempting to commit me psychiatrically right during
orthodox Easter on 13th and 14th of April 2017 by breaking again into my mother’s
home and threatened my mother they will break into her home daily and because of
this my mother has fallen ill with Zoster Area from stress and trauma. They also tried
again on 27th of April 2017 again harassing my mother dressed in civil clothes. They
ultimately arrested me from my law faculty exams and poisoned me in the period of
27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 causing me and my mother also suffering, and
ultimately separated me permanently from my family by forcing me to go into hiding
from this murderous regime after they uncovered their intend to imprison me
indefinitely to life and torture me to gravely harm me or murder me with Invega
poisoning to silence me, through falsified decision in 12718/231/2017. See annex 19
Being less important, the rest of infringed ECHR articles I summarize as follows:
Article 9 My right to free conscience has been infringed upon by huge pressures though grave
abuses against me by this organized criminal group using the judicial system and
psychiatry as a system of wrongful repression
Article 10 My right of free expression has been infringed upon by censorship on 08.April.2017
of militia.freeforums.net where I published the penal complaints against this criminal
group of so-called magistrates, which is legal according to Romanian Law 544/2001
article 13
Article 13 There is no such thing as effective remedy in Romania, as proven in 4909/231/2017,
and also 12718/231/2017 in which I filed a contestation which was never registered
Article 14 I've been discriminated by deliberated infringement of the data protection law,
where psychiatrically profiled dossiers of others were hidden from public but mine not
Article 17 The magistrate mafia "interpreted" the law disregarding all the aspects that didn't
match their murderous intent for the purpose of depriving me of liberty and gravely
harming me, which is an illegal limitation of my rights
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 10 / 13
62. Is or was there an appeal or remedy available to you which you have not used? Yes
● No
63. If you answered Yes above, please state which appeal or remedy you have not used and explain why not
65. If you answered Yes above, please give a concise summary of the procedure (complaints submitted, name of the international body
and date and nature of any decisions given).
66. Do you (the applicant) currently have, or have you previously had, any other applications before the ● Yes
Court? No
67. If you answered Yes above, please write the relevant application number(s) in the box below.
31061/17 - Rule 39, illegally destroyed 3 times by Romanian agent "D.Lupu" posing as "registrar"; 1st time lying I must
complete this form breaking ECHR Rule 47 5.1; 2nd time lying I must attach a decision's motivation which didn't exist and
was irrelevant as I proved it illegal before the motivation was issued; 3rd time ignoring the request with the motivated
decision attached as "D.Lupu" requested, proving again he had no intention ever of this grave matter reaching the judges
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 12 / 13
68. In the box below, please list the documents in chronological order with a concise description. Indicate the page number at which
each document may be found.
the falsified documents regarding my illegal detainment on 17th September 2015, based around penal dossier 2417/
1. P/2014 p. 1
the falsified documents regarding harassment, threatening and blackmail leading to consummation of these felonies
2. with the falsification of an involuntary psychiatric internment judicial decision in 11224/231/2015 - 2417/P/2014 p. 9
the annulment as unfounded of the involuntary psychiatric internment judicial decision in 11224/231/2015, as well
3. as the falsified prosecutor's proposal p. 14
after losing in 11224/231/2015 the "prosecutor" in cahoots with the crooked psychiatrists falsified this psychiatric
4. report in my absence anyway p. 15
using the falsified psychiatric report the "prosecutor" filed a proposal that I be obligated to medical treatment,
5. registered in dossier 14277/231/2015, in which the prosecutor's proposal was rejected as inadmissible p. 23
however judge in dossier 14277/231/2015 falsified a mandate of detainment instead of sending me subpoena, for
6. the purpose of impeding my defence by consulting the file and preparing my plea before appearing in court p. 26
another “prosecutor” falsified an appeal against 14277/231/2015 - 2417/P/2014, lacking active quality and most
7. importantly any juridical logic as well as all the other "magistrates" in these cases p. 27
same "prosecutor" who falsified 14277/231/2015 appeal, in my dossiers regarding complaints about the first
8. prosecutor's acts of procedure in 2417/P/2014 falsified the penal dossier 2845/P/2016 against me p. 32
the "judge" in prosecutor's falsified appeal 14277/231/2016, on 24th June 2017, harassed me for hours verbally,
9. falsified 2 judicial tickets against me then falsified penal files 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 against me p. 36
the annulment as unfounded of the obligatory medical treatment proposal in 14277/231/2015, proving both the
10. other prosecutor's appeal and the original prosecutor's proposal were falsified. 4 judges changed in this file illegally p. 44
the falsified mandate of detainment in 4791/231/2017 by the same judge who falsified it identically in
11. 10547/231/2015 for 17th September 2015, executed on 06th April 2017 p. 46
same judge in 4791/231/2017 falsified another mandate in 4909/231/2017 for bringing me in court at the last
12. moment and not allowed to build a defense. He falsified de decision in 4909/231/2017, same day 10th April 2017 p. 47
first judge in my appeal against 4909/231/2017 demanded to "prove you're not the devil" as in medieval witch
13. hunts, asking me to prove I'm not mentally alienated which I actually did - not my job to prove my innocence p. 56
second judge in my appeal against 4909/231/2017 falsified the decision of rejection of appeal. Annex 19
14. representing my plea in 12718/231/2017 also proves 4909/231/2017 was falsified, as 11224/231/2015 was p. 57
a falsified decision against my extraordinary attack against 4909/231/2017 rejection of appeal, containing at 5th
15. page the proof that I am: ~"free as long as hospitals and courthouses deem fit"!? p. 65
the falsified psychiatric discharge papers. Diagnosis #1 sais the right to file a penal complaint is acute psychosis and
16. diagnosis #2 sais I’m imagining I’m under penal pursuit in the four penal files I proven exist. No motivation given p. 77
my penal history certificate from 6th July 2017 proving I'm absolutely innocent thus all these grave abuses are
17. totalitarian wrongful repression methods p. 79
a falsified prosecutor's ordinance who closes the last 3 penal files against me proposing that I be poisoned with
18. Invega to "cure" me of his obvious lies that I'm irresponsible, lacking total discernment and a public danger p. 80
the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 that I be obligated to "medical treatment", the "judge" using especially the
19. term in Romanian ro.:“medicamentos” meaning as translated in en.:"drugged" p. 88
my plea in 12718/231/2017 proving the proposal is falsified as well a decision based on it would, as the proposals in
20. 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 were, from where I actually adapted the plea because of ne bis idem p. 89
proofs or my grounds of fearing indefinite to life detainment in a psychiatric ward, physical and psychical torture /
21. permanent infirmity infliction and loss of life, as forwarded to various institutions p. 191
22. proofs that I'm a student of law faculty in first year, that I paid and graduated the first year p. 215
explanatory notes based on the extra 20 pages I am allowed to annex, containing short demonstration of the
23. illegality of psychiatric actions, urgency of request, damage claims, background, proposals for interim measures p. 218
24. copy of my mother's judiciary representative mandate I given her through the notary p. 238
25. p.
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 13 / 13
69. Comments
Romanian agent "D.Lupu" posing as "registrar" is under penal pursuit in Romania for illegally and repeatedly destroying
my urgent ECHR request, penal complaint which I will update for complicity to Torture, Bodily harm, attempted Qualified
murder, Deprivation of liberty illegally, Subjection to bad treatment and other felonies, and I will notify the prosecutor's
office near ECHR where he perpetrated the crimes as well to clarify in paper proof to the world that ECHR is fake justice,
defending murderer totalitarian regimes, or EU is depending on the prosecutor's course of action
70. Date
0 6 1 1 2 0 1 7 e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y
The applicant(s) or the applicant’s representative(s) must sign in the box below.
71. Signature(s) Applicant(s) ● Representative(s) - tick as appropriate
Confirmation of correspondent
If there is more than one applicant or more than one representative, please give the name and address of the one person with whom
the Court will correspond. Where the applicant is represented, the Court will correspond only with the representative (lawyer or non-
lawyer).
72. Name and address of Applicant ● Representative - tick as appropriate
893669e1-66ca-4653-b9e0-2de2561a694b
ANNEX 1. Page 1
Tudor Raneti
ROMÂNIA
TRIBUNALUL VRANCEA
SECğIA PENALĂ
ÎNCHEIERE
ùedinĠa din camera de consiliu de la 28.10.2015
InstanĠa constituită din:
Judecător de drepturi úi libertăĠi: Dorel Hărăbor
Grefier: Veronica LucuĠă
……………….
ÎN NUMELE LEGII,
DISPUNE
În baza art. 184 alin. 18 C.pr.pen., admite contestaĠie formulată de suspectul RANETI TUDOR
ANDREI, născut la data de 10.10.1980, în Mun. Focúani, jud. Vrancea, cu domiciliul în Bucureúti, sector 3, str.
THEODOR PALLADY, nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc. B, ap. 61, cu adresa de corespondenĠă aleasă la
tudor.raneti@gmail.com, împotriva Încheierii din 12.10.2015, pronunĠată de Judecătoria Focúani.
DesfiinĠează Încheierea din 12.10.2015, pronunĠată de Judecătoria Focúani úi în rejudecare, respinge
ca nefondată propunerea de internare medicală nevoluntară, formulată de Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria
Focúani.
Cheltuielile judiciare rămân în sarcina statului.
Onorariul pentru apărătorul din oficiu, în cuantum de 130 lei, va fi avansat din fondurile Ministerului de
JustiĠie.
DEFINITIVĂ.
PronunĠată în camera de consiliu, astăzi, 28.10.2015.
1
ANNEX 4. Page 15
Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18. Page 81
Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18. Page 82
Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18. Page 83
Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18. Page 84
Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18. Page 85
Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18. Page 86
Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18. Page 87
Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 19. Page 88
ANNEX 20. Page 89
Domnule presedinte,
subsemnatul Raneti Tudor Andrei , domiciliat in Bucuresti bd. Theodor Pallady nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc.
B, et. 6, apt. 61, sectorul 3, unde nu locuiesc din 2009, identificat cu B.I./C.I. seria RT nr. 654712 emis de
SPCEP S3 biroul nr. 4 la data de 04.09.2009 si avand C.N.P. 1801010394508, cu adresa de
corespondenta electronica aleasa cf. art. 257 (5), art. 259 (1) si art. 289 (5) din CPP modificat si
completat prin OUG nr. 3/2014: tudor.raneti@gmail.com,
Pagina 2 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 91
cum ar ordonantele, in special ordonanta falsificata de punere in miscare a actiunii penale expres
prevazuta de lege ca se comunica cf. art. 309 (3) din CPP, certificatele medico-legale psihiatrice
falsificatesi alte acte “medicale” falsificate, marturii false s.a.m.d., delirand (crezand fals) ca-mi
ingreuneaza acuzarea penala a asa-ziselor organe judiciare, medici-legisti, psihiatri si eventual martori
mincinosi din aceste dosare, respectiv nu mi s-a respectat prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din
CEDO dat fiind ca sunt singurul acuzat de o fapta fictiva pentru care nu am fost condamnat definitiv
deci fapta nu exista nici macar fizic si nici macar in realitate ascultarea la casti de carti audio nu poate
tulbura linistea si nu constituie o fapta penala evident iar cuvinte si gesturi de ocara care nu exista
conform inregistrarilor audio si marturiilor generice si aberante care oricum nu se pot contrazice cu
inregistrarea audio, cu atat mai putin nu pot exista, respectiv nu s-au administrat probele nici macar
pentru partea acuzarii pentru ca este imposibil de justificat minciunile evidente din dosarele
2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 constituind infractiunile de Falsul in declaratii
si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare savarsite Paun Ionel Iulian si Popa Mariana, asa-zisi
judecatori de la Judecatoria Focsani respectiv Tribunalul Vrancea in incercarea in special prin
Amenintare, Santaj, Lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, Supunerea la rele tratamente, Vatamarea
corporala si tentativa de Omor calificat precum si alte infractiuni, de a musamaliza realitatea despre
dosarul falsificat 2417/P/2014 de Mihaila Paul in principal la instigarea asa-zisului judecator Dita Mirela
cu concursul si complicitatea mai multor asa-zise organe judiciare si alti functionari publici precum
atesta dosarele falsificate in legatura 10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015, si
deoarece de drept sunt nevinovat conform prezumtiei de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO si
prin urmare fapta nu exista fizic - deoarece nu exista o hotarare definitiva conform careia am fost
condamnat, si fiindca sunt singurul suspect / acuzat din dosare, conform legii nu doar a probatoriului,
fapta nu poate exista nici macar fizic conform prezumtiei de nevinovatie cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP si art.
23 din Constitutia Romaniei. Daca fapta nu exista fizic sau penal, nu se poate infera ca am savarsit o
fapta din cauza unor afectiuni mintale deci toate actele medicale sunt vadit falsificate. In realitatea de
drept integrala insa, cf. art. 20 din Constitutia Romaniei si cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO o persoana este
nevinovata pana la dovedirea vinovatiei sale printr-o hotarare de condamnare cu respectarea integrala a
garantiilor procesuale cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO adica nu hotararea de condamnare inceteaza prezumtia de
nevinovatie, ci demonstratia vinovatiei cu respectarea garantiilor procesuale, nicidecum prezumtia de
nevinovatie incetand la falsificarea unei ordonante de renuntarea la urmarirea penala ce n-are nici un
suport de drept constitutional in Romania si in CEDO cu care de fapt este in contradictie cf. art. 6 (1) din
CEDO, ori judecatorii si cetatenii in general au obligatia de a respecta suprematia Constitutiei Romaniei
cf. art. 1 din CR si a tratatelor ratificate de Romania cf. art. 11 si 20 din CR, si
Pagina 3 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 92
Intampinare
Pagina 4 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 93
raspundre fara sa fiu acuzat de Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare ceea ce
face proba veritatii faptului ca “organele judiciare” recunosc ca am dreptate fiindca nu ma acuza de
acestea, precum si multe alte probe cum ar fi martorii propusi si neaudiati, neconsemnarea,
neadministrarea si neobiectivarea probatoriului nici pentru mine nici pentru acuzare facand ordonantele
perfect nemotivate, refuzul de a-mi acorda dreptul de a studia dosarul prin comunicarea in copie a
elementelor din acesta necomunicate de mine cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP s.a.m.d.
Nu am calitate procesuala in vreun dosar penal si neavand calitate procesuala precum fiind
necondamnat adica beneficiind de prezumtia de nevinovatie, nu pot fi supus nici unei masuri penale de
nici un fel, adica din acelasi motiv pentru care propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical din
14277/231/2015 a fost constatata inadmisibila.
Dat fiind ca otravirea cu Invega si alte neurotoxine pe baza de fluor si clor provoaca distrugerea
creierului si in cele din urma moartea conform prospectului Invega cu care am fost deja Vatamat
corporal in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 sub motivarea ca sunt student anul I la drept la
Universitatea Ecologica centrul de la Scoala Generala “Anghel Saligny”, deoarece am fost detinut ilegal
de la examene, legal si otravit la psihiatrie fara nici o justificare legala, factuala si fara sa existe vreun act
juridic medical pentru nici un abuz grav savarsit in aceasta perioada, si bineinteles cu incalcarea
integrala a legislatiei in vigoare, inseamna ca aceiasi criminali vor proceda in mod identic sau mai rau in
urma obligarii mele la “tratament medical” adica la otravire cu neurotoxina Invega pe baza de fluor. Asa-
zisa companie care a comercializat Invega a fost condamnata adesea pentru comercializarea de otravuri
ca medicamente, pretinde ca trateaza schizofrenia, diagnostic ce pana si-n fisa de externare falsificata
din 08.06.2017 nu exista precum evident n-a existat nici la data de 27.05.2017, fiind evident in concluzie
ca nu este vorba de medicina care prin juramantul lui Hipocrate nu poate cauza rau, si nici de masuri de
siguranta, ci de o atrocitate premeditata a crimei organizate din “provincia europeana” Vrancea. Aceasta
constituie o grava incalcare a dreptului la viata cf. art. 2 din CEDO
Internarea nevoluntara cf. art. 315 (2) e) din CPP n-are nici o legatura cu obligarea la tratament
medical provizoriu cf. art. 566-572 din CPP deoarece internarea nevoluntara se dispune doar cu
incalcarea legii din start fiindca este in contradictoriu cu art. 566-572 din CPP care prevede internarea
nevoluntara doar in cazul refuzului “tratamentului” adica a otravirii in acest caz, ceea ce releva intentia
criminala a mafiei magistratilor de a ma lichida prin otravire cu neurotoxine pentru a-si musamaliza
crimele pe care le-am denuntat public si la parchet. Demonstrez si ca procurorul e vadit iresponsabil,
precum atesta faptul ca nu se scrie in ordonanta de clasare cf. art. 315 (2) din CPP “clasare cauzei ...
pentru savarsirea infractiunilor ... art. 278 Cp., art.278 Cp. si art. 278 Cp. cu aplicarea artr. 38” deoarece
[1] cauzele nu se claseaza cf. art. 315 (2) niciodata, acelea fiind mentiuni pentru clasarea cf. art. 315 (1)
din CPP, [2] nu se scrie “infractiunilor ... art. 278 Cp., art.278 Cp. si art. 278 Cp.” ci se face o singura data
acordul si mai ales se demonstreaza savarsirea infractiunilor, nu se declara deoarece aceasta nu este
niciodata o demonstratie conform logicii juridice, ci un rechizitoriu este, [3] Cod Penal se prescurteaza
“C.P. “nu “Cp.”, [4] e vorba de art. 28 nu 38, s.a.m.d.
Utilizarea sistemului judiciar, psihiatriei si fortelor de ordine in mod ilegal ca arma de represiune
nedreapta a adevarului despre activitatea criminala a “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” is
“jandarmilor” Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat cel putin in “provincia europeana” Vrancea
Pagina 5 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 94
constituie in flagrant incalcarea 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12
al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale, precum explicitez sumarizat la punctul 4 mai jos si prin prezenta
detaliat
2. este nefondata adica neintemeiata pe fapte reale precum a fost si propunerea identic
mincinoasa din 14277/231/2015, ci intemeiata pe minciuni precum atesta probatoriul dosarelor
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 dealtfel neconsemnat, neadministrat si neobiectivat nici
macar pentru acuzare tocmai fiindca este imposibil de dovedit vinovatia mea in baza unor probe care-mi
demonstreaza nevinovatia. Cf. art. 7 (1) din CEDO, nici o fapta fictiva nu constituie o fapta penala
Mai mult, toate actele “medicale” sunt falsificate deoarece au fost intocmite in lipsa mea - cf.
art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 expertiza nu poate avea loc decat in mod direct, si in mod direct poate avea
loc doar cu consimtamantul meu cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP, ceea ce in ordonanta falsificata de clasare este
consemnat ca nu l-am dat vreodata, stiind ca “organele judiciare” Constituite intr-un grup infractional
organizat au nevoie de consimtamantul meu pentru a falsifica legalitatea expertizei, dat fiind ca nu pot
falsifica fondul expertizei oricum precum am demonstrat in prezenta ca actele “medicale” sunt
falsificate in fond adica fara nici o inferenta juridica logica, fara precizarea faptelor adica, doar prin
acuzatii generice adesea contradictorii
Mai mult, toate actele “medicale” sunt necomunicate in mod ilegal si prin urmare inadmisibile
conform principiului contradictorialitatii cf. art. 349 si art. 351 din CPP si dreptului garantat la aparare.
Aceasta constituie o incalcare a garantiilor procesuale cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO
Utilizarea sistemului judiciar, psihiatriei si fortelor de ordine in mod ilegal ca arma de represiune
nedreapta a adevarului despre activitatea criminala a “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” is
“jandarmilor” Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat cel putin in “provincia europeana” Vrancea
constituie in flagrant incalcarea 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12
al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale, precum explicitez sumarizat la punctul 4 mai jos si prin prezenta
detaliat
3. este nefondata adica neintemeiata pe acte medicale reale deoarece aceastea daca exista in
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sunt falsificate la fel cum au fost falsificate in 2417/P/2014.
Declar pe propria raspundere ca n-am fost vreodata expertizat psihiatric nu doar fiindca n-am consimtit
cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, sau fiindca expertiza este ilegala fata de mine
fiindca se dispunde doar pentru omor si pruncucidere cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP in caz contrar orice
indoiala a procurorului interpretandu-se obligatoriu in favoarea suspectului sau acuzatului cf. art. 4 (2)
din CPP, ci fiindca fizic declar pe propria raspundere ca nici macar n-am fost intrebat vreodata de ceva
in legatura cu 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 de psihiatri sau psihologi,
tocmai fiindca acuzatiile ce mi se aduc sunt vadit fictive si a ma si intreba daca am savarsit fapte vadit
fictive si de ce ar insemna ca cel care intreaba e veritabil tampit, un rol pe care nici macar asa-zisii medici
psihiatri vranceni n-au consimtit sa-l joace. Mai mult, deoarece la niste examene psihologice de
personalitate si inteligenta am fost intrebat in mod identic ca la examenele psihologice de la medicina
muncii si medicina armatei, si fiindca n-am fost diagnosticat pentru acestea in trecut, evident nu pot fi
diagnosticat pe acestea in prezent decat prin falsificarea actelor “medicale” - psihologia nici macar nu
Pagina 6 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 95
pretinde ca este medicina ca sarlatania numita “psihiatria” care de fapt e acelasi lucru cu exceptia ca
este utilizata de statele totalitare ca arma de represiune precum a fost utilizata la inceput de nazisti, si
inainte de ei de orice sarlatan - Sigmund Freud spre exemplu a luat spaga de la doua companii
farmaceutice sa promoveze drogurile heroina si opiumul ca tratamente psihiatrice
Utilizarea sistemului judiciar, psihiatriei si fortelor de ordine in mod ilegal ca arma de represiune
nedreapta a adevarului despre activitatea criminala a “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” is
“jandarmilor” Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat cel putin in “provincia europeana” Vrancea
constituie in flagrant incalcarea 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12
al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale, precum explicitez sumarizat la punctul 4 mai jos si prin prezenta
detaliat
4. este neconstitutionala / nelegala si prin urmare inadmisibila cf. art. 11 si art. 20 din CR
deoarece imi incalca
4.1. dreptul de a-mi fi respectate drepturile omului cf. art. 1 din CEDO, respectiv
4.2. dreptul la viata cf. art. 2 din CEDO, dat fiind ca otravirea cu Invega si alte neurotoxine pe
baza de fluor si clor provoaca distrugerea creierului si in cele din urma moartea conform prospectului
Invega cu care am fost deja Vatamat corporal in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 fara nici un diagnostic,
sub motivarea implicita ca sunt student anul I la drept la Universitatea Ecologica centrul de la Scoala
Generala “Anghel Saligny”, deoarece am fost detinut ilegal de la examene, legal si otravit la psihiatrie
fara nici o justificare legala, factuala si fara sa existe vreun act juridic medical pentru nici un abuz grav
savarsit in aceasta perioada impotriva mea bineinteles cu incalcarea integrala a legislatiei in vigoare,
ceea ce inseamna ca aceiasi criminali vor proceda in mod identic sau mai rau in urma obligarii
mele la “tratament medical” adica otravire cu neurotoxina Invega pe baza de fluor. Asa-zisa companie
care a comercializat Invega a fost condamnata adesea pentru comercializarea de otravuri ca
medicamente, pretinde ca trateaza schizofrenia, diagnostic ce pana si-n fisa de externare falsificata din
08.06.2017 nu exista precum evident n-a existat nici la data de 27.05.2017, fiind evident in concluzie ca
nu este vorba de medicina care prin juramantul lui Hipocrate nu poate cauza rau, si nici de masuri de
siguranta, ci de o atrocitate premeditata a crimei organizate din “provincia europeana” Vrancea
4.3. dreptul de a nu fi supus torturii si la tratament inuman sau degradant cf. art. 3 din CEDO,
dat fiind ca am fost Vatamat corporal in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 precum am descris pe scurt la
punctul anterior si detaliat in continuare
4.4. dreptul la libertate si securitate cf. art. 5 din CEDO dat fiind ca in conformitate cu legea n-
am savarsit nici o fapta penala pentru a fi privat de libertate repetat si cu rea-credinta
4.6. dreptul la un proces echitabil cf. art. 6 din CEDO insemnand dreptul de a fi judecat de o
instanta impartiala deoare n-am fost judecat de loc si prin urmare prin intentarea obligarii la tratament
medical mi s-a incalcat dreptul la prezumtia de nevinovatie, iar pe parcursul asa-zisului proces penal mi
s-a incalcat grosolan dreptul la aparare prin necomunicarea actelor de procedura obligatorii a se
comunica adica ordonante, acte “medicale” si toate probele “impotriva mea” care de fapt nu exista
fiindca toate probele din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia, respectiv inclusiv nu s-a sustinut
confruntarea cf. art. 113 din CPP dat fiind ca marturiile sunt aberante si chiar daca nu contribuie la
Pagina 7 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 96
acuzarea impotriva mea, contribuie la acuzarea mea impotriva asa-ziselor organe judiciare si la
lamurirea cauzei implicit
4.7. dreptul de a nu fi pedepsit decat conform legii cf. art. 7 din CEDO. Deoarece sunt acuzat de
fapte fictive si vadit imposibile conform logicii si probelor de la dosar, evident sunt nevinovat deoarece
faptele fictive nu sunt incriminate penal. Mai mult, asa-zisa medicina adica sarlatania numita psihiatrie
utilizata in acest caz si nu numai ca arma de represiune nedreapta pentru musamalizarea adevarului
despre crimele “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” si “jandarmilor” din “provincia
europeana” Vrancea ca-n lagarele naziste de unde provine in special otravirea cu fluor, nu poate fi
folosita ca pedeapsa deoarece nu pedepsirea este rolul legal al medicinei conform juramantului lui
Hipocrate, ceea ce daca ar fi, ar fi neconstitutional cf. art. 22 din CR privind dreptul la integritatea fizica
si corporala. Nu in ultimul rand doctrinar “tratamentul psihiatric” este administrat ucigasilor ceea ce
releva obsesia criminala a “organelor judiciare” care au falsificat actiunea de obligarea la tratament
medical in scopul de a ma Vatama corporal pentru a ma reduce la tacere cu privire la crimele lor
impotriva mea din aceste dosare si din prealabil pe care incearca sa le musamalizeze astfel
4.8. dreptul de a avea viata privata si de familie cf. art. 8 din CEDO. Deoarece “organele
judiciare” planuiesc sa ma Vateme corporal grav sau sa ma omoare deoarece acesta este efectul otravii
neurotoxice Invega pe termen lung precum a fost documentat in prospect si precum este demonstrat
stiintific de notorietate ca “tratamentul” antipsihotic nu face altceva decat sa distruga creierul, dovedit
prin faptul ca m-au otravit deja in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 si m-au Vatamat corporal, evident
imi incalca dreptul la viata de orice fel, inclusiv dreptul de a-mi intemeia o familie deoarece otrava
neurotoxica Invega provoaca inclusiv impotenta si anhedonia, adica incapacitatea de a avea copii prin
distrugerea functionalitatii organelor reproductive precum instaleaza si depresia cronica - fluorul nu are
nici o functie biologica, fiind o puternica otrava neurotoxica in primul rand, si fiind toxica in general
pentru orice forma de viata
4.9. dreptul la libertatea gandirii, constiinta si la libertatea religiei cf. art. 9 din CEDO. Prin
obligarea mea la “tratament medical” adica la Vatamarea corporala grava precum demonstrez in
prezenta, imi este incalcata total libertatea gandirii, constiinte si la practica libera a religiei prin
distrugerea creierului si in cele din urma uciderea mea prin otravirea mea cu neurotoxine pe baza de
clor si fluor nejustificat legal sau factual precum grupul infractional organizat care a falsificat dosarele
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 a procedat in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017. Cu
mentiunea ca mi s-a refuzat expres libertatea religioasa in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 prin refuzul
“psihiatrilor” de a permite sa primesc o carte de rugaciuni de la mama mea.
Pe scurt asa-zisele organe judiciare si asa-zisii medici psihiatri urmaresc sa ma distruga deoarece
fiind credincios in gandire si constiinta statului si ordinii de drept, le-am denuntat crimele impotriva mea
din propriu interes la autoritatile penale, precum si public din patriotism motiv pentru care acestia au
proferat aberatii adesea cu privire la articolele mele de pe internet privind activitatea lor criminala. In
acest scop si in flagrant mi-au cenzurat forumul militia.freeforums.net, si au incercat sa-mi cenzureze
contul de facebook, simultan cu arestarile mele ilegale din 06.04.2017, 10.04.2017 si tentativele de a ma
interna la psihiatrie din 13 si 14.04.2017 in Saptamana Mare adica de Sfintele Pasti, la fel pentru a-mi
batjocori viata religioasa si de familie in tipic stil mafiot
Pagina 8 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 97
n-a avut loc fiindca am refuzat cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, ori de fata nici
macar n-a fost un reprezentant legal fiind incalcata legea sub toate aspectele pe data de 06.04.2017,
inclusiv motivarea falsificata a mandatului de aducere din 05.04.2017 din 4791/231/2017 deoarece cf.
art. 184 (4) din CPP doar daca suspectul sau inculpatul consimte apoi se sustrage examinarii poate fi
adus cu forta, altfel examinarea este evident imposibila prin refuzul de a sustine interviul care oricum
este inutil indicand ca psihiatria este o sarlatanie nu o stiinta, deoarece in special infractorii sunt
sociopati, iar caracteristica principala a sociopatilor este mitomania, adica acestia mint la interviul
psihiatric si prin urmare examinarea psihiatrica nu are nici o valoare stiintifica sau judiciara, cu atat mai
mult cu cat este evident din aceasta intampinare ca “psihiatrii” sunt infractori sau sociopati criminali si
falsifica rapoartele psihiatrice;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
2. raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 ce nu mi s-a
comunicat in mod ilegal cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002, data la care sau in
prealabil pentru acest raport n-am fost anuntat si prin urmare nu m-am dus personal si nici n-am fost
detinut ilegal si adus cu forta ca pe data de 17.09.2017 prin mandatul falsificat de “judecatorul” Dinu
Murgulet Ana din 10.09.2015 din 10547/231/2015 sau pe data de 06.04.2017 prin mandatul falsificat de
acelasi “judecator” Dinu Murgulet Ana din 05.04.2017 din 4791/231/2017 sub pretextul ilegal al unei
expertize psihiatrice imposibil de realizat fara acordul meu, pentru Santajarea mea, Supunerea mea la
rele tratamente prin Lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal si tracasare, dar si pentru falsificarea raportului
de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015 care in
realitate a fost falsificat in perioada 30.10.2015-03.12.2015 dupa ce clica mafiota ce a falsificat dosarul
2417/P/2014 a pierdut la contestatie actiunea de internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015. In
concluzie la fel, deoarece examinarea psihiatrica se desfasoara doar prin interviu cf. art. 10 din Legea
487/2002 si pentru raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 nici
macar n-am fost prezent, este dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca raportul de expertiza
medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 este falsificat in lipsa mea precum am demonstrat
ca este raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 in dosarul 14277/231/2015
avand obiectul obligarea la tratament medical respins ca inadmisibil pentru aceleasi motive de
nelegalitate si netemeinicie pentru care invoc inadmisibilitatea si neemeinicia actiunii 12718/231/2017;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
Pagina 10 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 99
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
3. fisa de externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon”
continand doua diagnostice vadit falsificate cum ca studentia la facultatea de drepet e “psihoza acuta
predominant deliranta “ si “paranoia premorbida” prin faptul ca detentia psihiatrica este relevanta
doar la momentul constatarii necesitatii atentiei psihiatrice adica in prezent cf. art. 122 din
Regulamentul de ordine interioara al Socola Iasi, deoarece declar pe propria raspundere ca nu am fost
expertizat psihiatric in prealabilul datei de 27.05.2017 nici dupa aceasta data ci am fost detinut pe
27.05.2017 de la examenele la facultatea de drept de la centrul Focsani al Universitatii Ecologice de la
Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny” Focsani unde sunt student in anul I de 3 securisti in civil, am fost
incarcerat si legat la psihiatrie fara justificare si fara un diagnostic otravit prin injectare cu neurotoxine
pe baza de fluor si clor adica Haloperidol, Invega respectiv Diazepam si Prazolex. Prospectul Invega
precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea si nici
un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific, precum mentionez sarlatania cum ca aceasta otrava trateaza
schizofrenia pentru care nu am fost diagnosticat relevand scopul real al abuzurilor grave din 27.05.2017
- 08.06.2017 adica otravirea - pe durata internarii am fost abuzat fizic si Vatamat corporal si amenintat
de asa-zisul psihiatru curant Barbarosie ca daca refuz sa consimt sa fiu “expertizat” si “tratat” voi fi
obligat la fel prin abuz fizic si Vatamare corporala. Am fost obligat astfel prin amenintare sa iau 10 zile
Prazolex si Invega respectiv la un test de urina care a demonstrat ca nu ma droghez ci psihiatrii si
organele judiciare halucineaza ca ma droghez din moment ce au dispus un asemenea test in special
fiindca nici macar nu m-a acuzat cineva ca ma droghez, si mi s-au prelevat impotriva vointei mele 3 fiole
de sange fara sa reiasa iarasi nici o problema cum ca ma droghez si prin urmare nici un motiv pentru
acest test decat sa fiu Vatamat corporal precum atesta si intentia asa-zisului psihiatru curant sa ma
oblige sa fiu iradiat cu un test CT care nu este pentru creier ci pentru oasele capului si iradiaza de sute de
ori mai mult ca o analiza normala cu raze X. La asa-zisele examene psihologice am constatat aceleasi
intrebari la care am raspuns la examinarile pentru medicina muncii de mai multe ori sau la recrutare si
incorporare in armata, la care am raspuns in mod identic si fiindca nu am fost diagnosticat de medicina
muncii sau de medicina armatei este dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca fisa de externare
din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” este falsificata precum demonstrez
prin proba 5 reprezentand pledoaria mea detaliata privind modul in care a fost falsificata aceasta mai
precis prin incalcarea legii si falsificarea in mod generic a realitatii de fapt adica printr-un delir de
termeni psihiatrici aruncati la intamplare fara nici o acoperire in fapte reale cu care ar fi trebui sa se
coreleze aceste inferente pentru a fi valide, motiv pentru care testele se si contrazic tocmai fiindca sunt
fara acoperire in realitatea de fapt si emise de mincinosi diferiti, precum aceste minciuni sunt mai ales in
contradictie cu legea si logica juridica pe care trebuie sa se intameieze toate actele juridice. Prospectul
Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea
si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific tocmai fiindca este o otrava, o neurotoxina bazata pe fluor
care nu are nici o functie biologica. Invega este de notorietate conform prospectului o neurotoxina
Pagina 11 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 100
Pagina 12 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 101
Pagina 13 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 102
si solicit sa constatati deasemenea ca toate aceste asa-zise acte juridice / judiciare sunt nule de
drept cf. art. 280 si art. 282 din CPP fiindca sunt nelegale, netemeinice si falsificate cu rea-credinta
criminala, precum le declar pe propria raspundere si precum demonstrez in continuare pe scurt si in
detaliu la sectiunea I, motiv pentru care invoc nulitatea acestor acte, si
Pagina 14 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 103
documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific, si precum
reamintesc compania ce comercializeaza Invega, adesea condamnata conform presei pentru
comercializarea de otravuri drept medicamente, pretinde ca Invega trateaza schizofrenia pentru care
nici macar n-am fost diagnosticat in documentele falsificate de “psihiatrii”
2. netemeinica deoarece este introdusa in baza unor inscrisuri vadit falsificate precum am
demonstrat mai sus si prin urmare nimic de care sunt acuzat sau ce se declara fals in aceste documente
false nu poate fi inferat in mod valid despre mine deoarece nu exista premize valide adica nici faptele nu
exista fizic, arhiprobat prin marturii, probele materiale audio ale sedintelor de judecata, declaratiile
mele si alte probe declarate la dosar si neconsemnate si neadministrate cu rea-credinta de “organele
judiciare”, precum nici premiza universala nu s-a respectat adica legea. Din premize false inferenta
judiciara nu poate fi decat falsa, ori in mod vadit aceasta este si intentia criminala
3. neconstitutionala cf. art. 11 si art. 20 din CR deoarece mi s-au incalcat in flagrant drepturile
din CEDO art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a
libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit psihosomatica si Santajarea mea prin
folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si Amenintarea cu Lipsirea de libertate in mod
ilegal, Supunerea la rele tratamente si Vatamarea corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate
neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu
tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”,
“jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia
magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un
cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma
persecuta abuzand de functia publica utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme
de represiune nedreapta.
Pentru demonstrarea suplimentara a neconstitutionalitatii obligarii mele la tratament medical
pentru fapte fictive cum ar fi tulburarea linistii prin ascultarea de carti audio la casti si gesturi si cuvinte
de ocara fictive conform marturiilor, probelor materiale audio-video a inregistrarilor audio si alte probe
din dosar cum ar fi declaratiile mele pe propria raspundere pentru care n-am fost acuzat de Falsul in
declaratii deci “organele judiciare” recunosc ca spun adevarul si sunt nevinovat, am formulat doua cereri
de sesizare a Curtii Constitutionale in care am invocat exceptia de neconstitutionalitate a art. 315 (2) e)
din CPP deoarece nu se poate vorbi de existenta infractiunii in faza urmaririi penale fiindca procurorul
nu are capacitatea juridica de a aprecia aceasta si precum se vede nici capacitatea mintala in general in
Romania fiindca daca un singur procuror infractor este tolerat in sistemul judiciar romanesc inseamna ca
asa-zisa toleranta este de fapt intentie criminala si complicitate la infractiunile acelui “procuror” iar
aceasta inseamna ca intreg corpul functionarilor Ministerului Public cel putin este corupt, fiindca acesta
este tolerat atat de colegi cat si pe scara ierarhica, respectiv, am invocat exceptia de
neconstitutionalitate a art. 566-572 din CPP deoarece “tratamentul” psihiatric nu este altceva decat
Vatamare corporala ceea ce contravine direct art. 22 din CR “Dreptul la viaţă, precum şi dreptul la
integritate fizică şi psihică ale persoanei sunt garantate. Nimeni nu poate fi supus torturii şi
nici unui fel de pedeapsă sau de tratament inuman ori degradant”. Pentru acest motiv solicit si
constatarea incalcarii art. 3 din CEDO
4. de rea-credinta criminala deoarece autorii inscrisurilor vadit falsificate urmaresc evident
punerea mea intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate pentru vatamarea sanatatii mele fizice si psihice prin
injectarea sau administrarea fortata de substante toxice, aceasta actiune demonstrand adevarata
Pagina 16 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 105
intentie a acestui grup infractional organizat care a incercat reducerea mea la tacere mai intai prin
instigarea interlopului Herghelegiu Danut care pe 27.10.2014 si 05.12.2014 a savarsite tentativa de
Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala lovindu-ma in cap si aruncandu-ma pe treptele scarii blocului in
stare de inconstienta, si fiindca am demonstrat ca instigatorul principal e asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela
de la Judecatoria Focsani, acesta a intentat impotriva mea punerea sub interdictie 15730/231/2014 pe
care a pierdut-o, dosarul penal 2417/P/2014 din care a instigat la internarea me nevoluntara
11224/231/2015 in care clica sa criminala a pierdut la contestatie apoi obligarea mea la tratament
medical 14277/231/2015 in care au pierdut si la fond si la contestatie, motiv pentru care ulterior chiar in
dosarele in care am demonstrat ca 2417/P/2014, 10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015
sunt falsificate au inventat dosarele penale 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 inscenandu-ma
si in mod identic au falsificat procedura pentru a ma Vatama corporal in scopul de a ma impiedica sa
continui urmarirea lor penala pentru crimele savarsite impotriva mea prin folosirea sistemului judiciar,
fortelor de ordine si a psihiatriei ca arme de represiune nedreapta
Pagina 17 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 106
(4) Actele incheiate impreuna cu mijloacele materiale de proba se inainteaza, de indata, organelor de
urmarire penala.
(5) Procesul-verbal incheiat in conformitate cu prevederile alin. (1) constituie act de sesizare a organelor
de urmarire penala si nu poate fi supus controlului pe calea contenciosului administrativ.
Cu mentiunea ca infractiunile pentru care actiunea penala se pune in miscare din oficiu, sunt
infractiunile flagrante, in general care nu se pun in miscare la plangerea penala a partii vatamate,
conform opiniei unor avocati
Cu aceasta ocazie rog completul de judecata sa ia act si de faptul ca raportul de expertiza
medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015 din 2417/P/2014 contine
un diagnostic prezumtiv, deoarece inafara de faptul ca este vadit falsificat, este inscris cu, citez “cel mai
probabil”, precum poate constata completul de judecata la fila 103 din dosarul 14277/231/2015
reprezentand ultima fila din raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din
presupusa data de 17.09.2015. Deoarece aceiasi “medici” au intocmit toate asa-zisele certificate
medico-legale psihiatrice este vadita alienarea mintala a acestora din incoerenta in motivarea acestora
despre care reamintesc aberatii cum ar fi ca au declarat ca am studii superioare, gandire rapida, cultura
generala si sunt lipsit concomitent de discernamant, sau ca am istoric judiciar adica cazier penal ceea ce
e evident o minciuna. Deoarece toate asa-zisele acte medicale au fost falsificate de aceiasi autori privind
fapte fictive, evident acestea trebuie sa corespunda insa nu corespund tocmai fiindca precum se spune
popular ca minciuna are picioare scurte, memoria mincinosilor este scurta ca si mintea lor si sunt
incoerenti in ticluirea de acte false, deopotriva in continutul fiecarui act falsificate precum si comparativ
actele falsificate sunt incoerente intre ele dar si cu realitatea vadita a dosarelor tocmai fiindca sunt
falsificate grosolan tipic caracterului grobian al falsificatorilor
Inafara de faptul ca tulburarile de personalitate nu sunt tratabile medical asa cum voi demonstra
in baza literaturii de specialitate in psihiatrie si proba materiala audio-video sarlatania asa-zisilor medici
legisti psihiatri consumata in scopul de a ma vatama prin injectarea cu substante toxice sau in alte
moduri,
propunerea ca trebuie sa fiu obligat la tratament medical pentru ca psihiatrii mint ca n-am
discernamant nu face obiectul art. 566-572 din CPP deoarece exemplificativ si drept dovada prin
Pagina 18 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 107
Pagina 19 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 108
calitate de nevinovat grupul infractional din Focsani urmareste vatamarea sau uciderea mea sub
pretextul obligarii la tratament medical.
Asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian mi-a incalcat in flagrant dreptul fundamental al
prezumtiei de nevinovatie stabilit prin art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP, 23 (11) din CR si tratatele ratificate de
Romania adica cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO si art. 11 din Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului, mintind
ca am savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prin care se subintelege ca am fost
condamnat printr-o hotarare definitiva, precum a si instigat pe asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu si
alti coautori care au falsificat mai multe rapoarte de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica, mintind ca n-am
discernamant, ca sunt violent, ca am istoric judiciar prin care se subintelege ca am cazier penal s.a.m.d.
In dovedirea incalcarii prezumtiei de nevinovatie pe langa demonstratia in fapt sau premiza
particulara a silogismului acestei intampinari invoc legea sau premiza universala:
art. 99
Suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiază de prezumţia de nevinovăţie, nefiind obligat să îşi
dovedească nevinovăţia, şi are dreptul de a nu contribui la propria acuzare.
Este evident faptul ca am fost urmarit penal in dosarele inventate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 pentru ca asa-zisele organele judiciare sa savarseasca abuzuri impotriva mea, deoarece
fapta nu exista si atunci evident probele impotriva mea nu exista, coroborat cu faptul ca toate probele
din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si conform principiului non-contradictiei nu-mi pot dovedi
vinovatia in acelasi timp si sub acelasi raport
adica aceasta exprimare este o contradictie care probeaza lipsa de discernamant a celor care o folosesc,
ori “psihoza acuta” si “predominant deliranta” este un silogism, ambele grupari de termeni avand relativ
acelasi inteles ceea ce iarasi demonstreaza ca acesti sarlatani habar n-au ce spun)
in timp ce deasemenea a retinut ca am studii superioare, gandire rapida, cultura generala
s.a.m.d., evident asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu neavand nici macar discernamant in calitate de
infractor, incriminandu-se penal prin propriul fals intelectual.
Mai mult coroborez cu evidenta de notorietate a sanatatii mele mintale prin faptul ca lucrand 4
(patru) ani ca Programator IT (cf. COR) la SC ROMANIA HYPERMARCHE SA (CORA) si ALTEN SI-TEHNO,
am acumulat 4 (patru) certificate de medicina muncii care atesta ca sunt sanatos psihic si apt de munca,
precum pot chema martori, printre care chiar Dutescu Mircea Mihai din Focsani care facea crize ca
membru al Comisiei urland ca “sunt pericol public” fiindca neavand argumente valide ci fiind un
tortionar troglodit a ridicat vocea ca sa-mi acopere explicatiile privind faptul ca sunt nevinovat si victima
unui grav abuz, “medic” cu care m-am consultat dupa ce interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, instigat de grupul
infractional local din Focsani, a savarsit in flagrant pe data de 05.12.2015 tentativa de Omor calificat si
Vatamarea corporala impotriva mea, grup infractional organizat care apoi la serviciul de urgenta a
Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani a instigat sa fiu injectat in cotul mainii drepte fara acordul meu, cu o
substanta necunoscuta de o persoana necunoscuta care a crezut ca nu voi simti, iar dupa ce am deschis
dosare penale si civile interlopului Herghelegiu Danut, exact asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela instigatorul
interlopului si acestor abuzuri a sustras dosarele civile si le-a musamalizat falsificand hotararile, a
falsificat cauza 15730/231/2014 avand obiectul punerea sub interdictie pe care a si pierdut-o drept
dovada, si in scopul abuzarii mele pentru a renunta la dreptate sau a ma reduce la tacere prin vatamarea
mea fizica si psihica, a instigat pe asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul sa falsifice dosarul 2417/P/2014 care a
fost inventat aproape concomitent cu tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala din
05.12.2015 savarsita de interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, apoi asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a falsificat
propunerea de internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015 anulata drept dovada si ulterior a falsificat
propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical 14277/231/2015 anulata drept dovada, constituind
evident tentativa si proba obsesiei criminale a grupului infractional local de a ma pune intr-o situatie de
vulnerabilitate pentru a ma vatama prin injectarea cu substante toxice, lovire sau in alte moduri.
In dovedirea inadmisibilitatii obligatii mele la tratament medical invoc principiul aplicarii unitare
a dreptului cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romanie si ca jurisprudenta dosarul 907/307/2010 de la
Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei din care citez conform articolului de specialitate de la adresa:
http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-ivascu-internarea-medicala-
nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-statului.html
“
La 19 octombrie 2009, procuratura a solicitat instanței pronunțarea unui ordin de tratament psihiatric
obligatoriu. Într-o decizie finală din data de 1 septembrie 2010, Judecătoria Sighetu Marmației a respins
cererea procurorului. Instanța a considerat că, în temeiul articolului 111 din Codul penal (corespondent
art. 107 din noul Cod Penal, privind scopul masurilor de siguranta), măsurile de siguranță (cum ar fi
admiterea obligatorie într-o unitate medicală și un ordin de a urma un tratament psihiatric) au drept
scop să pună capăt unor situații periculoase și pentru a preveni fenomenul infracțional. De aceea, ele ar
trebui impuse doar persoanelor care au săvârșit infracțiuni prevăzute de dreptul penal. Prin urmare, un
ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus reclamantului până când nu se va stabili
că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor.
Pagina 22 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 111
“
Prin hotararea judecatoreasca din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei
probez faptul moral pe care-l consider de notorietate, ca este ilegal a supune o persoana nevinovata la
tratament medical obligatoriu, sau o persoana care beneficiaza de prezumtia de nevinovatie in cazul
meu in calitate de nevinovat in dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016
precum si 12718/231/2017, precum atesta faptul ca ordonanta de renuntarea la urmarirea penala e
falsificata nu doar prin faptul ca e vadit nemotivata, ilegala, bazata pe acte juridice si judiciare falsificate,
ci ma acuza ca am savarsit o fapta penala fara sa probeze aceasta printr-o hotarare judecatoreasca
definitiva cf. art. 23 (11) din CR care probeaza vinovatia mea cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO, in caz contrar avand
dreptul la prezumtia de nevinovatie, suspect insemnand ca nu exista probe impotriva mea si inculpat ca
sunt acuzat si exista presupuse probe impotriva mea, insa fiindca probele in numar de 0 (zero) sunt
aceleasi si atunci cand am avut calitatea de suspect, si de inculpat, iarasi este dovedita nevinovatia mea
precum si abuzul asa-ziselor organe judiciare de a ma chema sa dau aceeasi declaratie identica de 3 ori
privind acuzatii vadit falsificate impotriva mea conform marturiilor din dosar si conform probelor
materiale audio a inregistrarilor de sedinta din 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016 cand am fost inscenat, motiv
pentru care am formulat plangere penala prealabila pentru Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a
organelor judiciare impotriva asa-zisilor judecatori Paun Ionel Iulian si Popa Mariana, reclamagii
mincinosi din aceste dosare, precum am inculpat in aceleasi dosare si pe asa-zisele organe judiciare care
au falsificat aceste dosare impotriva mea, dupa modelul cazului de notorietate Berbeceanu care si-a
inculpat acuzatorii mincinosi in aceleasi dosare in care este acuzat, si-n care in cele din urma au fost
condamnati
B. invoc exceptia lipsei calitatii procesuale pasive pentru aceleasi motive pentru care am
invocat exceptia inadmisibilitatii
In dovedirea compatibilitatii motivarii in fapt a exceptiei lipsei calitatii procesuale pasive si a
exceptiei inadmisibilitatii invoc literatura de specialitate in drept de la adresa:
http://legeaz.net/dictionar-juridic/exceptia-lipsei-calitatii-procesuale
de unde citez:
“
De vreme ce calitatea procesuală este o condiţie de admisibilitate a acţiunii, s-a apreciat că nu este
greşită nici soluţia de respingere a cererii ca inadmisibilă, în urma admiterii acestei excepţii de fond.
“
C. invoc exceptia autoritatii de lucru judecat deoarece n-am fost judecat in 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, insa am fost judecat pentru fapte fictive si acuzat de lipsa de disernamant
de mai multe ori in prealabil din 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015, acest dosar din urma fiind identic
cu 12718/231/2017 adica bazat pe acuzatii de fapte fictive si documente vadit falsificate. Conform
principiului de drept ne ibis idem, nimeni nu poate fi judecat pentru acelasi lucru de doua ori chiar si sub
alta incadrare, si deoarece acuzatiile ca sunt lipsit de discernamant savarsind fapte imaginate de asa-
zisele organe judiciare, au fost judecate adica in fondul propunerii de internarea mea nevoluntara in
Pagina 23 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 112
scopul efectuarii expertizei psihiatrice care a fost declarata nefondata prin hotararea judecatoreasca din
dosarul 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, si acelasi fond invocat in
propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical a fost declarat inadmisibil in fond si nefondat la
contestatie in 14277/231/2015 la Judecatoria Focsani si Tribunalul Vrancea, sub prezumtia ca as fi fost
judecat si gasit vinovat tot se aplica exceptia autoritatii de lucru judecat ce atrage inadmisibilitatea
actiunii 12718/231/2017 precum ar fi atras si inadmisibilitatea sesizarii instantei prin rechizitoriu
deoarece am mai fost judecat pentru fapte fictive in trecut si acuzat de lipsa de discernamant in mod
mincinos
In dovedirea admisibilitatii exceptiei autoritatii de lucru judecat, citez literatura de specialitate
in drept de la adresa: http://legeaz.net/dictionar-juridic/autoritate-lucru-judeact-hotarari-penale
“
în vederea invocării autorităţii de lucru judecat se cer întrunite cumulativ următoarele condiţii:
a) existenţa unei hotărâri penale definitive; b) o nouă acţiune penală îndreptată împotriva aceleiaşi
persoane (eadem personae) c) să fie vorba de acelaşi fapt material (idem factumf.
a) Autoritatea de lucru judecat derivă din puterea pe care o au exclusiv hotărârile judecătoreşti
definitive, celelalte acte procesuale ale organelor judiciare penale neavând această autoritate.
...
b) Cea de-a doua condiţie presupune să se fi declanşat un proces penal împoriva aceleiaşi persoane. în
alţi termeni, aceeaşi persoană trebuie să aibă calitatea procesuală de învinuit sau inculpat.
Lipsa de identitate între celelalte părţi din cauză nu are relevanţă sub aspectul autorităţii de lucru
judecat.
...
c) Cea de-a treia condiţie ce se cere pentru a exista autoritatea de lucru judecat vizează existenţa
aceluiaşi fapt material).
în practica judiciară din perioada interbelică s-a decis că în materie penală există lucru judecat nu numai
pentru faptul cum el a fost calificat, ci pentru faptul material însuşi, astfel cum a avut loc, aşa că faptul
nu mai poate face obiectul unei a doua urmăriri, sub o nouă calificare şi indiferent de soluţia pronunţată,
ceea ce este confirmat, în prezent, prin art. 10 lit. j din Codul de procedură penală.
...
în penal, identitatea de cauză este înlăturată prin însăşi precizarea din art. 10 lit. j din Codul de
procedură penală, potrivit căreia autoritatea de lucru judecat îşi produce efectele chiar dacă faptei
definitiv judecate i s-ar da o altă încadrare juridică.
“
* art. 10 j) din vechiul CPP corespunde art. 16 i) din noul CPP
Faptele definitiv judecate sunt acuzatiile vadit fictive din 2417/P/2014, prin care mi-am
demonstrat nevinovatia si faptul ca asa-zisele organe judiciare vrancene sunt de fapt infractorii.
Deoarece acuzatiile de fapte imaginate de asa-zisele organe judiciare vrancene sunt identice, cum ca
sunt lipsit de discernamant, evident este aplicabil principiul ne bis idem intre toate dosarele
11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015, 4909/231/2017 si 12718/231/2017, in care sunt acuzat de acelasi
lucru bazat in mod identic pe documente falsificate in 12718/231/2017 ca si-n 14277/231/2015
Daca prin absurd nu sunt admise exceptiile inadmisibilitatii si a lipsei calitatii procesuale pasive,
automat se retine ca am calitatea de inculpat in mod nelegal si netemeinic cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP,
art. 23 (11) din CR, art. 11, 20 din CR si art. 11 din Declaratia universala a drepturilor omului si art. 6 (2)
din CEDO, ceea ce atrage admiterea oricum a exceptiei autoritatii de lucru judecat a fondului propunerii
Pagina 24 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 113
de obligarea la tratament medical prin care sunt acuzat ca n-am discernamant si despre care am
demonstrat ca sunt judecat pentru a 4-a oara dupa ce am demonstrat ca am discernamant si “organele
judiciare” si “medicii psihiatri” n-au, dar repet in virtutea viciului de procedura si folosind aceasta
exprimare contradictorie intentionat pentru a sublinia realitatea de fapt, beneficiez de prezumtia de
nevinovatie pana la dovedirea infractiunii cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO, mai precis in mod echitabil adica legal
cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO
Pagina 25 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 114
nu poate fi legala si temeinica si nici asa-zisele acte medicale care sunt nelegale si netemeinice oricum
din alte motive infatisate in prezenta concomitent
4. referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical este falsificat in motivarea in fapt
si de drept, fiind obligatorie motivarea in fapt si de drept a actelor organului de urmarire penala in
conditiile legii, adica motivarea trebuie intocmita conform logicii juridice printr-un silogism sau inferenta
bazata pe premiza universala a legii corelata relevant cu premiza particulara factuala adica a realitatii de
fapt a dosarului sau pe scurt sa reprezinte adevarul sau realitatea nu s-o falsifice, de drept cf. art. 5, art.
286 d) si art. 306 din CPP, motiv pentru care aceasta ordonanta este nula de drept cf. art. 280 si art. 282
(1) din CPP. Toti cetatenii cf. art. 1 din CR si in particular orice functionar public cum ar fi judecatorii cf.
art. 124 din CR se supun numai legii nu ordinelor ilicite ale “procurorilor”
5. raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de
17.09.2015, raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din 06.04.2017, raportul de expertiza
medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016(!? - n-am vazut nici un psihiatru sau medic legist
de orice fel in persoana la aceasta data sau dealtfel in prealabil in contextul dosarelor 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 deci acestia au sustinut interviul psihiatric evident in imaginatia lor), fisa de
externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon”, certificatul medico-legal
psihiatric din 08.06.2017 si alte asa-zise acte medicale, toate necomunicate oficial adica ilegal cu
impropriile exceptii 970/A1-P/232 pe care l-am gasit ascuns la arhiva in 2015 si a fisei de externare
absolut lipsita de motivarea in fapt, sunt vadit falsificate in fapt si de drept, intocmit cu incalcarea art.
184(1)(3,4) din CPP, art. 10,11,17 din Legea 487/2002, art. 3 din Norme metodologice privind activitatea
medicului legist in calitate de expert numit de organele judiciare la solicitarea partilor precum si alte
incalcari ale regulementelor medico-legale si codului deontologic profesional.
Pagina 26 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 115
inscrisurile din 4971/231/2017 avand obiectul detinerea mea in mod nelegal si netemeinic la
psihiatrie, identic falsificat de acelasi asa-zis judecator Dinu Murgulet Ana ca si 10547/231/2017, dupa
care acelasi asa-zis judecator Dinu Murgulet Ana a sustras si falsificat
inscrisurile din dosarul 4909/231/2017 avand obiectul internarea mea nevoluntara, dosar
identic cu 11224/231/2015 pierdut de “procurorii” instigati de Dita Mirela la Vatamarea mea corporala
si Omorul calificat, cu mentiunea ca Dita Mirela este reclamantul mincinos din 2417/P/2014 si
15730/231/2014 deci si instigatorul din dosarele identic falsificate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016,
4329/P/2016, 4791/231/2017, 4791/231/2017 (-10547/231/2015), 4909/231/2017 (-11224/231/2015)
si 12718/231/2017 (-14277/231/2015)
Art. 17 din Legea 487/2002 republicata 2012, legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu
tulburari psihice
Evaluarea sanatatii mintale in cadrul expertizei medico-legale psihiatrice se face in conformitate cu
prevederile legale in vigoare.
In fapt, asa-zisele acte medicale din dosarele relevante cauzei sunt falsificate in flagrant precum
l-am denuntat, deoarece expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nu a avut loc insa ele sunt mentionate in
ordonanta falsificata de renuntarea la urmarirea penala si alte indicii ca exista, inclusiv ar trebui sa existe
Pagina 27 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 116
pentru validitatea actiunii de obligarea mea la tratament medical ceea ce s-ar putea prezuma daca mi-ar
fi fost comunicate insa fiindca nu mi s-au comunicat, mi s-a incalcat in flagrant dreptul la aparare cf. art.
3 din CEDO in particular conform principiului contradictorialitatii adica trebuind a fi informat cu privire la
toate acuzele ce mi se aduc si asa-zisele probe pe care se intemeiaza pentru ca sa am posibilitatea de a
ma opune acestora respectiv de a-i acuza pe autori de falsuri, si acesta e exact motivul pentru care nu mi
s-au comunicat aceste inscrisuri ceea ce este irelevant fiindca atunci probele ce nu mi s-au comunicat si
care oricum le-am demonstrat falsificate in temeiul legii adica asa-zisele acte medicale, nu pot fi luate in
considerare din cauza nerespectarii garantiilor procesuale, dreptul la aparare fiind garantat inclusiv de
Constitutia Romaniei cf. art. 24 din CR ori conform doctrinei administrarii probelor, ascunderea probelor
demonstreaza dolul celui care le ascunde si prin urmare aceasta stare de fapt probeaza nevinovatia
mea, proba admisibila cf. art. 97 din CPP. Fiind anulata propunerea de internarea mea nevoluntara in
scopul efectuarii expertizei medico-legale psihiatrice in dosarul 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la
Tribunalul Vrancea mentionez ca mi-am demonstrat atunci conform principiului non-contradictiei
sanatatae mintala deoarece daca ia un asemenea efort concentrat in incercarea de a ma scoate alienat
mintal, inseamna ca sunt mai mult decat normal si sanatos, avand si abilitatea gratie lui Dumnezeu de a
combate atat amar de dusmani si de a-mi demonstra nevinovatia. Precum am demonstrat repetat dar
relevant, orice raport de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica emis in privinta mea nu poate fi decat
falsificat in flagrant in drept, incalcandu-se art. 183(1)(3, 4) din CPP, art. 10, 11, 17 din Legea 487/2002,
adica datorita faptului ca nu pot fi expertizat medico-legal psihiatric decat cu consimtamantul meu pe
care nu-l dau stiind ca sarlatanii de psihiatri si instigatorii lor “organele judiciare” infractoare au nevoie
de aceasta conditie ca sa falsifice aspectul legal al abuzurilor criminale impotriva mea de Vatamare
corporala si Omorul calificat, precum reamintesc ca ar fi trebuit sa fiu inculpat sau condamnat pentru
infractiunile de omorul sau pruncuciderea pentru a se pune macar problema evaluarii mele psihiatrice
de catre procuror, inainte de conditia obligatorie a consimtamantul meu liber dat in scris, dar si
documentat si informat in prezenta unui reprezentant legal sau conventional care chiar daca as fi fost
acuzat de omorul sau pruncuciderea si nu de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei si in particular de aberatia
tulburarii linistii prin ascultarea de carti audio la casti demonstrand ca “organele judiciare” efectiv n-au
de ce sa ma acuze motiv pentru care au venit cu asemenea prostie, lipsa consimtamantului meu iarasi
impiedica expertizarea mea psihiatrica tocmai fiindca dreptul la integritate fizica si psihica este garantat
chiar si ucigasilor fiindca noi, cetatenii normali integrati social statului de drept nu suntem ca ei - ordinea
de drept nu este legea talionului nici razbunare ci armonie si pace
In dovedire invoc legea:
Pagina 28 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 117
Art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
(1) Evaluarea sanatatii mintale se efectueaza, prin examinare directa a persoanei in cauza, numai de
catre medicul psihiatru.
(2) Evaluarea se va realiza in institutii de sanatate mintala, autorizate si acreditate conform legii.
Art. 11 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
Evaluarea sanatatii mintale se face cu consimtamantul liber, informat si documentat al persoanei, cu
exceptia situatiilor specifice, stabilite de lege, cand persoana evaluata are dificultati in a aprecia
implicatiile unei decizii asupra ei insesi, situatii in care persoana evaluata trebuie sa beneficieze de
asistenta reprezentantului legal sau conventional.
Art. 13 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
(1) Obiectivul evaluarii este stabilirea diagnosticului.
Pagina 29 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 118
I. In fapt,
descriu situatia de fapt si de drept organizat pe sectiuni astfel:
Pagina 30 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 119
Pagina 31 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 120
falsificand hotararile si si-a instigat grupul infractional organizat sa-i musamalizeze dosarul penal,
respectiv sa falsifice dosarele penale si cu profil psihiatric enumerate in prezenta pentru a ma impiedica
sa trag la raspundere penala si civila acest grup infractional organizat, si sa-i denunt public motiv pentru
care acest an au cenzurat forumul militia.freeforums.net si au incercat sa-mi cenzureze contul de
facebook simultan cu arestarile ilegale din 06, 10, 13 si 14 Aprilie 2017, sperand sa ma reduca la tacere
fara a avea posibilitatea de a le publica abuzurile criminale,
precum demonstrez in continuare:
Pagina 32 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 121
art. 99
Suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiază de prezumţia de nevinovăţie, nefiind obligat să îşi
dovedească nevinovăţia, şi are dreptul de a nu contribui la propria acuzare.
Este evident faptul ca am fost urmarit penal in dosarele inventate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 pentru ca asa-zisele organele judiciare sa savarseasca abuzuri impotriva mea, deoarece
Pagina 33 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 122
fapta nu exista si atunci evident probele impotriva mea nu exista, coroborat cu faptul ca toate probele
din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si conform principiului non-contradictiei nu-mi pot dovedi
vinovatia in acelasi timp si sub acelasi raport
2. Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece nu sunt condamnat, cf. art.
107 din CP, si conform jurisprudentei hotararii din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu
Marmatiei
O persoana nevinovata nu poate fi obligata la tratament medical psihiatric deoarece scopul
tratamentului medical este prevenirea infractionalitatii nu a spiritului civic si a comportamentului
civilizat, asa cum au intentionat infractorii Lupu Mihai Cristian si Lucasievici Silviu prin intentarea
dosarului 12718/231/2017.
Conform hotararii din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei constituind
jurisprudenta in temeiul principiului aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romaniei, un
om nevinovat nu poate fi obligat la tratament psihiatric, ceea ce e evident pentru toata lumea sanatoasa
mintal, cu mentiunea ca tratamentul medical pshiatric este o sarlatanie precum voi demonstra in
prezenta citand din literatura de specialitate psihiatrica si facand referire la proba materiala audio-video,
un documentar public intitulat “Comercializarea nebuniei” prezentand marturiile mai multor psihologi,
pacienti si demonstratia stiintifica a faptului ca psihiatria este o sarlatanie, la care fac referire prin
adresa acestui documentar de pe internet prin proba 2, urmand a-l anexa la dosar la cererea instantei pe
un DVD, si solicitand aducerea dosarului 14277/231/2015 pentru utilizarea acestei probe si constatarea
ne bis idem privind acuzatii de fapte fictive impotriva mea deasemenea, si acuzatia vadit si demonstrat
netemeinica prin 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 ca n-as avea discernamant.
Precizez ca am avut calitatea de inculpat in dosarul 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 avand
obiectul Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei pana la data de 01.08.2017 cand asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai
Cristian a falsificat ordonanta de renuntarea la urmarirea penala mintind vadit ca am savarsit
infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei contrazicandu-se cu dovezile din dosar marturii, probe
materiale inregistrarile sedintelor de judecata din 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016, declaratii pe propria
raspundere s.a.m.d., privind fapte fictive pentru care drept dovada nu am fost condamnat, si in mod
nelegal si netemeinic dar si nerezonabil ca durata am fost urmarit penal peste 12 luni fara sa fie intocmit
rechizitoriul si trimis dosarul in judecata desi probele sunt aceleasi deci evident nu avea nici un rost
chemarea mea sa dau aceiasi declaratie de 3 ori respectiv nici ordonanta falsificata de continuarea
urmaririi penale datorita ordonantei falsificata de punerea in miscare a actiunii penale constituind
infractiunea flagranta de Represiunea nedreapta savarsita de “procurorul” Lupu Mihai Cristian, fiindca
evident este imposibila declaratia ca nu exista probe suficiente ca sa fiu suspect, concomitent cu exista
aceleasi probe suficiente sa fiu inculpat, conform principiului non-contradictiei, facand abstractie de
faptul ca “procurorul” Lupu Mihai Cristian n-a consemnat, administrat si obiectivat probatoriul nici
macar pentru acuzare deoarece ii este imposibil sa-mi demonstreze vinovatia in baza unui probatoriu
care imi demonstreaza nevinovatia. Dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 nu a fost
trimise in judecata pentru ca sunt dosare inventate de asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian si asa-zisul
politist Popescu Lacramioara, evident fara probe consemnate, administrate si obiectivate in privinta
semnificatiei lor, folosite de grupul infractional din care acestia fac parte pentru a savarsi aceste abuzuri
criminale impotriva mea, urmarind vatamarea mea fizica si psihica sau uciderea mea pentru a ma reduce
Pagina 34 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 123
la tacere. Conform art. 4 si art 99 din Codul de procedura penala, suspectul, adica cel impotriva caruia
nu exista probe, si inculpatul, beneficiaza pana la condamnarea definitiva de prezumtia de nevinovatie,
insa si aceasta condamnare se poate efectua doar cu respectarea garantiilor procesuale in cazul meu
absolut nerespectate, si cu dovedirea vinovatiei condamnatului in fapt si de drept ceea ce iarasi in cazul
meu nu s-a efectuat ceea ce este irelevant fiindca procurorul nu are capacitatea juridica de a condamna
pe nimeni, ceea ce iarasi demonstreaza nevinovatia mea prin refuzul “procurorului” Lupu Mihai Cristian
de a intocmi rechizitoriul si a ma trimite in judecata pentru a fi condamnat tocmai fiindca asemenea acte
judiciare sunt imposibil de realizat in baza unui probatoriu care-mi demonstreaza nevinovatia. Hotararea
din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei se intemeiaza pe art. 111 din vechiul Cod
Penal, corespondent art. 107 din noul Cod Penal in principal, si cf. art. 108-109 din CP, privind faptul ca
obligarea la tratament medical psihiatric are ca scop prevenirea infractionalitatii, si nu poate fi dispus in
consecinta decat unei persoane condamnate definitiv dar si dovedite stiintific a prezenta riscul de a
recidiva. Deoarece completul de judecata a dosarului 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei
probabil a fost neglijent, neavand la cunostinta intreg ansamblul legii, coroborez la aceasta hotarare cu
faptul ca o hotarare de obligarea la tratament medical psihiatric nu este admisibila decat in cazul
persoanelor cu adevarat lipsite de discernamant, altfel, obligarea la tratamanetul medical psihiatric se
efectueaza numai cu CONSIMTAMANTUL LIBER al persoanei condamnate, aceasta fiind o dubla conditie,
adica persoana obligata la tratament medical psihiatric sa fie condamnata pentru infractiunea de
omorul sau pruncuciderea cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, si sa-si dea CONSIMTAMANTUL cf. art. 29, 43 si altele
din Legea 487/2002, precum este obligatorie pentru expertizarea psihiatrica a condamnatului
CONSIMTAMANTUL LIBER cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si cf. art. 11, 17 din Legea 487/2002. Exceptia situatiei
cand persoana CONDAMNATA nu are discernamant, se stabileste stiintific in fapt si de drept si nu se
falsifica asa cum au procedat asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian si asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici
Silviu si complicii sai, coroborand la toate celelalte evidente cu faptul ca prezenta este intocmita de mine
la fel ca si celelalte acte depuse de mine din dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016,
12718/231/2017 respectiv dosarele 14277/231/2015, 11224/231/2015 in care am anulat propunerile
falsificate identice adica mincinoase cu ca n-am discernamant ca-n 12718/231/2017, ceea ce
demonstreaza ca am mai mult discernamant normal decat asa-zisele organe judiciare care s-au
incriminat penal in flagrant, demonstrand ca reprezinta nu doar un pericol public ci si un pericol pentru
propria lor persoana, altfel spus, demonstrand lipsa de discernamant si pierderea totala a contactului cu
realitatea juridica, profesioanala si sociala, ceea ce reprezinta schizofrenia, si prin incalcarea in mod
pervaziv a legii si drepturilor persoanelor au demonstrat tulburarea antisociala de personalitate sau
sociopatia
In concluzie, cf. art. 107 in particular, si art. 108-109 din CP, numai condamnatii pot fi obligati la
tratament medical, respectiv cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, doar condamnatii pentru omor sau pruncucidere SI
(nu “sau”) doar la propunerea procurorului motivata in fapt si de drept deci nu falsificata, si conform
jurisprudentei din dosarul 907/307/2010 coroborata cu principiul dreptului unitar cf. art. 124 din CR si
coroborata cu art. 107 din CP, doar daca se justifica stiintific periculozitatea condamnatului de a
recidiva, respectiv fiind imposibila d.p.d.v. legal expertizarea psihiatrica fara consimtamantul liber al
expertizatului cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, dar si obligarea la tratament medical
cf. art. 29, 43 si altele din Legea 487/2002, deoarece evident incarcerarea condamnatului rezolva aceeasi
problema a prevenirii fenomenului infractionalitatii, si dreptul la viata si integritatea fizica si psihica este
inalienabil in dreptul romanesc
Pagina 35 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 124
Exceptie face cazul lipsei de discernamant insa doar stabilit legal si temeinic si nu falsificat asa
cum au procedat infractorii Lupu Mihai Cristian, Lucasievici Silviu si complicii lor. In realitate psihiatria
este o sarlatanie notorie, care trateaza simptomele si nu boala in cel mai bun caz, ceea ce nu e cu ce se
ocupa medicina, fapt recunoscut de insasi literatura de specialitate psihiatrica, motiv pentru care asa-
zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian minte obsesiv ca nu am discernamant pentru a falsifica realitatea, fara
nici o proba macar circustantiala, si l-a instigat pe asa-zisul medic-legist Lucasievici Silviu sa minta ca am
“(cel mai probabil) ... discernamant mult diminuat”, in timp ce deasemenea a retinut ca am studii
superioare, gandire rapida, cultura generala s.a.m.d., evident asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu
neavand nici macar discernamant in calitate de infractor, incriminandu-se penal prin propriul fals
intelectual. Mai mult coroborez evidenta de notorietate a sanatatii mele mintale prin faptul ca lucrand 4
(patru) ani ca Programator IT (cf. COR) la SC ROMANIA HYPERMARCHE SA (CORA) si ALTEN SI-TEHNO,
am acumulat 4 (patru) certificate de medicina muncii care atesta ca sunt sanatos psihic si apt de munca,
precum pot chema martori, printre care chiar asa-zisul psihiatru Dutescu Mircea cu care m-am consultat
dupa ce interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, instigat de grupul infractional local din Focsani, a savarsit in
flagrant pe data de 05.12.2015 tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala impotriva mea, apoi
la serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani am fost injectat in cotul mainii drepte fara
acordul meu, cu o substanta necunoscuta de o persoana necunoscuta care a crezut ca nu voi simti, iar
dupa ce am deschis dosare penale interlopului Herghelegiu Danut si complicilor sai, in scopul abuzarii
mele pentru a renunta la dreptate sau a ma reduce la tacere prin vatamarea mea fizica si psihica, asa-
zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a inceput a falsifica acte de procedura in dosarul 2417/P/2014 care a fost
inventat aproape concomitent cu tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala din 05.12.2014
savarsita de interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, apoi asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a falsificat propunerea de
internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015 pe care a pierdut-o si ulterior a falsificat propunerea de
obligarea mea la tratament medical 14277/231/2015 pe care a pierdut-o constituind evident tentativa
grupului infractional local de a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate pentru a ma vatama prin
injectarea cu substante toxice, lovire sau in alte moduri, fapt pe care l-am demonstrat in multe alte
moduri indicate in inscrisurile anexate in dosarul 11224/231/2015 anexat la dosarul 14277/231/2015
In dovedire invoc principiul aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romanie si
jurisprudenta dosarului 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei din care citez conform
articolului de specialitate de la adresa: http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-
ivascu-internarea-medicala-nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-
statului.html
“
La 19 octombrie 2009, procuratura a solicitat instanței pronunțarea unui ordin de tratament psihiatric
obligatoriu. Într-o decizie finală din data de 1 septembrie 2010, Judecătoria Sighetu Marmației a respins
cererea procurorului. Instanța a considerat că, în temeiul articolului 111 din Codul penal, măsurile de
siguranță (cum ar fi admiterea obligatorie într-o unitate medicală și un ordin de a urma un tratament
psihiatric) au drept scop să pună capăt unor situații periculoase și pentru a preveni fenomenul
infracțional. De aceea, ele ar trebui impuse doar persoanelor care au săvârșit infracțiuni prevăzute de
dreptul penal. Prin urmare, un ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus
reclamantului până când nu se va stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a
comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor.
“
Pagina 36 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 125
Pagina 37 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 126
Pagina 38 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 127
art. 99
Suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiază de prezumţia de nevinovăţie, nefiind obligat să îşi
dovedească nevinovăţia, şi are dreptul de a nu contribui la propria acuzare.
Este evident faptul ca am fost urmarit penal in dosarele inventate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 pentru ca asa-zisele organele judiciare sa savarseasca abuzuri grave impotriva mea,
deoarece fapta nu exista si atunci evident probele impotriva mea nu exista, coroborat cu faptul ca toate
probele din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si conform principiului non-contradictiei nu-mi pot
dovedi vinovatia in acelasi timp si sub acelasi raport
Pagina 39 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 128
condamnat ci doar aceea de nevinovat, motiv pentru care evident nu am calitatea de condamnat adica
faptuitor pentru a ma putea incadra la conditiile art. 109 din CP
Coroborat cu faptul ca supunerea la tratament medical a suspectului sau chiar a inculpatului
este o aberatie judiciara cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din Codul de procedura penala privind prezumtia de
nevinovatie, si cf. art. 107 in principal si cf. art. 108-109 din CP, asa cum prea bine a hotarat instanta
Judecatoriei Sighetu - Marmatiei in dosarul 907/307/2010, precum citez din literatura de specialitate
care infatiseaza aceasta la adresa: http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-
ivascu-internarea-medicala-nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-
statului.html
“
La 19 octombrie 2009, procuratura a solicitat instanței pronunțarea unui ordin de tratament psihiatric
obligatoriu. Într-o decizie finală din data de 1 septembrie 2010, Judecătoria Sighetu Marmației a respins
cererea procurorului. Instanța a considerat că, în temeiul articolului 111 din Codul penal, măsurile de
siguranță (cum ar fi admiterea obligatorie într-o unitate medicală și un ordin de a urma un tratament
psihiatric) au drept scop să pună capăt unor situații periculoase și pentru a preveni fenomenul
infracțional. De aceea, ele ar trebui impuse doar persoanelor care au săvârșit infracțiuni prevăzute de
dreptul penal. Prin urmare, un ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus
reclamantului până când nu se va stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a
comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor.
“
Motive pentru care formulez inca o cerere de sesizare a Curtii Constitutionale pentru a declara
neconstitutionale art. 566-572 din CPP. Elementul cheie al neconstitutionalitatii art. 566-572 in
contradictie cu prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 23 (11) din Constitutia Romaniei, este prin raportare
textul art. 109 din Codul penal care reprezinta conditia, citez: "daca faptuitorul ... prezinta pericol pentru
societate". Conform art. 107 (2) din CP, faptuitorul este "persoana care a comis o fapta prevazuta de
legea penala, nejustificata", ori cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP, si art. 23 (11) din CR privind prezumtia de
nevinovatie, si stabilirea daca o persoana a comis o fapta prevazuta de legea penala, nejustificata, prin
demonstratia existentei faptei si a savarsirii faptei penale de catre o persoana cu respectarea integrala a
garantiilor procesuale a acelei persoane, este prerogativa exclusiva a judecatorului de a infaptui justitia
printr-o hotarare judecatoreasca, cf. art. 1 din Legea 303/2004 privind statutul magistratilor si art. 2 din
Legea 304/2004 privind organizarea judiciara. Deasemenea daca faptuitorului i se aplica sau nu o
pedeapsa este deasemenea prerogativa judecatorului, deoarece este unicul in masura a infaptui justitia
si stabili ca o persoana a comis o fapta prevazuta de legea penala, nejustificata, ori fiindca dovedit
sarlatania numita psihiatrie implicit eronat medicina este utilizata pentru a Vatama corporal, neavand
capacitatea de a trata nimic conform marturiilor de notorietate a insusi psihiatrilor si conform
documentarului stiintific “Comercializarea nebuniei” - en. “The marketing of madness”, de drept speta
privind orice obligare raportat la psihiatrie este nula deoarece cf. art. 22 din Constitutia Romaniei
Coroborez aceasta cu jurisprudenta, hotararea dosarului 907/307/2010 si in temeiul principului
dreptului unitar cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romaniei “Dreptul la viaţă, precum şi dreptul la integritate
fizică şi psihică ale persoanei sunt garantate. Nimeni nu poate fi supus torturii şi nici unui fel de pedeapsă
sau de tratament inuman ori degradant. Pedeapsa cu moartea este interzisă” cu mentiunea ca este
documentat precum si de notorietate ca otrava neurotoxica Invega provoaca inclusiv moartea pe langa
Pagina 40 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 129
sute de alte vatamari corporale fizice permanente, fiind bazata pe fluor adica metoda nazista de
represiune
Pagina 41 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 130
Pagina 42 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 131
raspunsurile mele la testele psihologice, precum nici macar la audierea contrafacuta a Comisiei care
trebuia sa ma puna in libertate conform legii si evidentelor nu s-a interesat de vadita mea nevinovatie ci
membrii acesteia au mintit acuzandu-ma ca “sunt pericol public” fara nici o dovada sau logica,
incalcandu-mi prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO, si ca sa-si justifice crimele, precum
pentru musamalizarea minciunilor lor nu mi-au comunicat procesul verbal intocmit
Confom “literaturii de specialitate” psihiatrice, expertizarea psihiatrica se realizeaza doar prin
interviu cf. art. 10 din Legea 487/2002, si facand abstractie de evidenta faptului ca insasi aceasta este o
imposibilitate stiintifica de a stabili adevarul deoarece in principal sociopatii sunt mitomaniaci, adica
mint si falsifica rezultatul asa-zisei expertize, deasemenea este evident ca expertiza nu se poate realiza
decat cu privire la starea actuala in momentul interviului a intervievatului adica nici cu privire la trecut,
nici la viitor, precum demonstrez invocand din Regulamentul intern al institutului de psihiatrie “Socola”
Iasi (dat fiind ca in contradictoriu cu legea la Focsani deliberat nu mi s-a acordat dreptul la informare cu
privire la lege si regulament pe care dealtfel asa-zisii psihiatri locali le-au incalcat in mod pervaziv cu rea-
credinta, cf. art. 122 din Regulamentul intern al institutului de psihiatrie “Socola” Iasi “Faptul ca o
persoana a fost ingrijita ori spitalizata in trecut nu justifica un diagnostic prezent sau viitor de tulburare
psihica” care fiind act normativ al legii nu poate fi decat identic cu toate regulamentele din tara, inclusiv
cel al Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani unde am fost Vatamat corporal grav.
Fiindca nu am fost “ingrijita ori spitalizata in trecut” vreodata si evident fiindca am fost Vatamat
corporal grav la Sectia de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani dealtfel fara nici un diagnostic
obtinut in mod direct cf. art. 10 din Lega 487/2002, demonstreaza ca fisa de externare si toate celelalte
documente falsificate de acesti “psihiatri” sunt vadit falsificate deoarece n-au nici o legatura cu trecutul,
prezentul sau viitorul meu fiindca nu pot avea nici o legatura deoarece nu am fost persoana “ingrijita ori
spitalizata in trecut”, ori am demonstrat oricum ca asa-zisele examinari psihologice au fost identice cu
cele pe care le-am sustinut repetat la medicina muncii, recrutare / incorporare si cu alte ocazii probabil,
ori fiindca am raspuns identic si in trecut n-am fost diagnoticat cu asa-zisele tulburari de personalitate,
cel putin nu cu stiinta mea dat fiind ca evidentele arata ca “psihiatrii” isi justifica existenta falsificand in
mod pervaziv documente dar si facand experimente nelegale si drogand persoane nevinovate precum
am demonstrat invocand comunicatul SRI catre parchetul general de notorietate privind aceasta stare
de fapt precum si numeroase dosare in care au fost condamnati nevinovati la “tratament medical” fara
sa savarseasca nici o fapta din care sa se poate infera ca sufera de orice “tulburare psihica”,
este in concluzie demonstrat mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca nu sufara ca si-n trecut in
campul muncii de exemplu, certificat de medicina muncii, de nici o “tulburare psihica”, deci toate
documentele “psihiatrice” impotriva mea sunt falsificate, cu precizarea ca utilizarea ghilimelelor asupra
cuvantului “psihiatrice” desemneaza faptul ca aceasta falsa stiinta medicala are norme pe care asa-zisii
psihiatri din Focsani le-au incalcat oricum, adica documentele “psihiatrice” sunt dublu falsificate, odata
in raport cu realitatea faptului ca psihiatria este o sarlatanie, o pseudostiinta medicala, si a doua ca
oricum “psihiatrii” vranceni si-au incalcat propriile norme profesionale si legea, fiind evident ca in aceste
regulamente si lege nu s-ar fi scris ca o persoana poate fi detinuta arbitrar la psihiatrie si ca psihiatria
este o sarlatanie, ci tocmai, activitatea psihiatrica este conditionata de consimtamantul fraierilor adica a
ignorantilor - victimele oricarei escrocherii din lume dealtfel, consimtamant care in cazul meu a fost
viciat in primul rand fiindca am refuzat sa fiu Vatamat Corporal, Lipsit de libertate in mod ilegal s.a.m.d.
ceea ce constitutie infractiuni, insa acest grup infractional organizat m-a Vatamat Corporal si Lipsit de
libertate in mod ilegal s.a.m.d. utilizand violenta si amenintarea cu violenta
Pagina 43 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 132
Pentru a elimina orice indoiala asupra sanatatii mele psihice, coroborez chiar la dovada faptului
ca nu sunt suspicios macar ci rational, prin evidenta faptului ca nu am deschis dosar penal asa-ziselor
organe judiciare si asa-zisilor medici, decat dupa ce au savarsit in flagrant infractiunile de falsurile in
inscrisuri, infractiunile de serviciu, infractiunile de impiedicarea infaptuirii justitiei, infractiunile
impotriva libertatii persoanei, infractiunile de coruptie si alte infractiuni
Pagina 44 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 133
Pagina 45 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 134
pentru a ma vatama prin injectare cu substante toxice sau in alte moduri, precum am fost injectat fara
acordul meu cu o substanta necunoscuta in zona cotului drept, de catre o persoana necunoscuta,
crezand ca nu simt, la serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului "Sf. Pantelimon" Focsani dupa ce am fost
transportat in urma tentativei de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala savarsita in flagrant de
interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, instigat de grupul infractional local prins deasemenea in flagrant
ascunzand probele in dosarul penal 246/P/2015 in scopul de a Favoriza faptuitorul Herghelegiu Danut.
Exista numeroase alte probe ale constituirii intr-un grup infractional organizat intre asa-zisii procurori
Mihaila Paul, Tarlea Florin Cristinel, asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, interlopul Herghelegiu Danut si alti
politisti, procurori si judecatori locali. Dosarele 14277/231/2015 si 12718/231/2017 avand obiectul
obligarea la tratament medical iarasi nu au nici o logica juridica, deoarece mai mult de faptul ca
expertiza psihiatrica nu poate avea loc datorita refuzului meu de a-mi da consimtamantul, asa-zisii
psihiatri, “organe judiciare” in cardasie cu asa-zise organe de ordine locale au folosit violenta si
amenintarea cu violenta pentru a ma “obliga la tratament medical” pe 27.05.2017 fara drept adica in
mod ilega, fara diagnostic, arestandu-ma de la Scoala “Anghel Saligny” unde urma sa dau 2 examene la
facultatea de drept a Universitatii Ecologice, legandu-ma la psihiatrie si injectandu-ma cu substante
neurotoxice pe baza de fluor si clor adica Haloperidol si Diazepam precum tinandu-ma si in conditii
septice pentru a ma imbolnavi adica cu oameni ai strazii nespalati dintre care unul l-au pus in pat cu
mine in tentativa de a ma imbolnavi, in masura in care conform regulamentului fiecare pat este atribuit
unei singure persoane, exista un numar maxim de paturi per salon, o distanta intre acestea, se intretin
normele de igienta in spital si curatenia s.a.m.d., nici una din acestea nefiind respectate de oligofrenii
criminali care se dau drept medici la Spitalul “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani, si care conform presei si
constatarilor SRI si ale parchetului general fac experimente ilegal pe “pacienti” adica pe oameni
nevinovati conform evidentei publice ECRIS a dosarelor, adusi cu violenta de “organele judiciare”, alti
psihopati criminali Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat, precum a fost adus d-l Grosu Ulise
care a castigat la CEDO cu privire la aceasta stare de fapt dealtfel
Pagina 46 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 135
Pagina 47 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 136
drept ne bis in idem, nimeni nu poate fi judecat de doua ori pentru aceeasi fapta halucinata de asa-zisul
procuror Mihaila Paul, care m-a acuzat sa n-am discernamant si sunt violent evident fara nici o proba
In concluzie deoarece propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical din 12718/231/2017 este
identic falsificata ca si-n 14277/231/2015, adica cu falsificarea realitatii de fapt fara nici o proba sau
obiectivare probatorie a declaratiilor mincinoase a “organelor judiciare”, cu incalcarea deliberata si
pervaziva a tuturor articolelor de lege relevante precum am demonstrat in prezenta, cu savarsirea
infractiunii de Uzul de fals adica utilizarea de documente “medicale” falsificate in 12718/231/2017 la fel
ca-n 14277/231/2015 precum am demonstrat in prezenta in fapt si de drept,
solicit respingerea propunerii falsificate din 12718/231/2017 pentru acelesi motive in temeiul
principiului aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art. 124 din CR, adica inadmisibila in principal si oricum
nefondata in subsidiar, precum solicit denuntarea catre autoritatile penale a inscrisurilor pe care le-am
declarat si demonstrat falsificate conform CPP, sub sanctiunea savarsirii infractiunii de Omisiunea
sesizarii cf. art. 267 din CP
Deoarece inscenarile adica dosarele falsificate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 au
fost inventate exact in sedintele privind dosarele in care am demonstrat crimele “organelor judiciare”
din 2417/P/2014, este evident ca instigatorul este acelasi asa-zis judecator Dita Mirela si complicii sai
deveniti intre timp autorii propriilor infractiuni pentru care sunt urmariti in mod relevant pentru
Constituirea unui grup infractional organizat. Drept dovada invoc urmatoarele situatii de fapt
Asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, reclamantul din dosarul 2417/P/2014 a mintit in flagrant ca am
amenintat-o, citez din Ordonanta de renuntarea la urmarirea penala din 10.12.2015 din 2417/P/2015
este falsificata in fapt si de drept astfel "sa fie pusa la zid si impuscata", motiv pentru care am formulat
plangere penala prealabila impotriva sa pentru Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor
judiciare deoarece nu exista asemenea citat in probatoriul dosarului 2417/P/2014, in curs de urmarire
deoarece am reintrodus dosarul penal inculpand si “organele judiciare” care au incercat degeaba sa
musamalizeze infractiunile savarsite de Dita Mirela, devenind astfel complici precum si autorii propriilor
infractiuni de falsuri in inscrisuri, infractiuni de coruptie, Constituirea unui grup infractional organizat
si alte infractiuni
Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul minte in 2417/P/2014 ca m-am prevalat de dreptul de a nu da
declaratii. In realitate fiindca am declarat si cerut sa fie consemnat ca asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul
este urmarit penal, acesta a mintit ca m-am prevalat de dreptul de a nu da declaratii pentru a nu
consemna aceasta. Mai mult, dupa ce i-am trimis in 2417/P/2015 toate plangerile penale prealabile, pe
care am observat ca le-a depus in Volumul II al dosarului 2417/P/2015, recent am observat in dosarul
2220/91/2015 ca Volumul II al dosarului 2417/P/2015 a disparut, precum au disparut si in jur de 40 de
probe din dosarul 2219/91/2015. Aceasta constituie infractiunea de Sustragerea sau distrugerea de
probe ori inscrisuri, cf. art. 275 din Codul Penal, cel mai probabil suspect fiind acelasi asa-zis procuror
Mihaila Paul, cu mentiunea ca asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul este urmarit penal in 8 (opt) dosare penale
privind infractiuni distincte in fapt, pe care le-a savarsit impotriva mea si impotriva mamei mele Raneti
Mariana
Deasemenea mentionez ca am comunicat la dosarul 2417/P/2014 o declaratie pe propria
raspundere prin care am efectuat declaratiile pe care asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul m-a pus in
imposibilitate sa le depun pe 17.09.2015 in dosarul 2417/P/2014, fiindca evident asa-zisul procuror
Mihaila Paul nu vrea sa se cunoasca adevarul, ca a falsificat dosarul 2417/P/2014 la instigarea asa-zisului
judecator Dita Mirela
Pagina 48 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 137
Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a avut un episod maniacal, si mintind ca am savarsit infractiunea
de Ultrajul judiciar a emis ordonanta de renuntare la urmarirea penala din 10.12.2015 din 2417/P/2015
in mod nelegal si netemeinic invocand art. 318(1)(2) din CPP raportat la art. 314(1) din CPP, deoarece
pentru invocarea lipsei de interes public, este obligatorie punerea in miscare a actiunii penale cf. art. 7
din CPP mai intai. Aceasta ordonanta mentionez a comunicat-o mamei mele pe data de 16.12.2015
presupun dupa stampila Postei Romane
Declar pe propria raspundere ca nu am fost condamnat pentru savarsirea infractiunii de Ultrajul
judiciar, precum este probata flagrant aceasta realitate prin lipsa hotararii judecatoresti definitive, lipsa
rechizitoriului si lipsa ordonantei de punerea in miscare a actiunii penale care daca nu mi-a fost
comunicata este nula de drept.
Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul si-a arogat functia de judecator, condamnandu-ma pentru
savarsirea infractiunii de Ultrajul judiciar, demonstrand inca o data ca este schizofrenic si sociopat cu
aspect delirant. Aceasta constituie infractiunea de Uzurparea functiei de procuror. Aceasta nu este o
premiera, precum asa-zisul prim-procuror Tarlea Florin Cristinel a instigat la deturnarea unei plangeri
impotriva actelor procurorului cf. art. 340 din CPP si a judecat-o declarand-o inadmisibila. Plangerea
impotriva actelor procurorului cf. art. 340 din CPP se judeca, evident, de judecator, aceasta constituind
deopotriva Uzurparea functiei de procuror, si Uzurparea de calitati oficiale adica aceea de judecator
In dovedire, justitia se infaptuieste in exclusivitate de judecatori cf. art. 1 din Legea 303/2004 si
art. 2 din Legea 304/2004. Deoarece asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul nu corespunde profesional in mod
evident, acesta a uzurpat functia de procuror prin faptul ca a savarsit infractiunile de falsurile in
inscrisuri, adica prin faptul ca a mintit in flagrant ca am savarsit infractiunea de Ultrajul judiciar.
In dovedire, in dosarul 2417/P/2014 nu s-a pus in miscare actiunea penala, ergo dosarul nu fost
trimis in judecata, ergo nu am fost condamnat pentru savarsirea infractiunii de Ultrajul judiciar, ergo
asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul minte ca am savarsit infractiunea de Ultrajul judiciar.
Nu in ultimul rand, cheltuielile judiciare de 800 de lei sunt deasemenea falsificate in fapt si de
drept fiindca in calitate de suspect in 2417/P/2014 nu suport cheltuielile judiciare ale dosarului
2417/P/2014, respectiv onorariul avocatului din oficiu este necuvenit, deoarece am deschis dosar penal
sotilor avocati Labunt pentru Asistenta si reprezentarea neloiala, deoarece nu mi-au acordat nici un
singur act de asistenta sau reprezentare juridica din data de 05.05.2015 la care au fost delegati in
dosarul 2417/P/2015. In fapt nu exista nici o expertiza contabila, barem sau lege care sa stabileasca in ce
consta suma de 800 de lei, cu exceptia onorariului necuvenit de 200 de lei. In dovedire de drept,
deoarece am avut calitatea de suspect in 2417/P/2014, si cf. art. 275 (3) si art. 276 (1) din CPP in care se
face referire la inculpat nu la suspect, nu se pot retine cheltuieli judiciare in sarcina suspectului
Mentionez ca am depus in copie plangerile penale prealabile impotriva inculpatului Mihaila Paul
in dosarul 2417/P/2014 care fusese conexat la dosarul 11224/231/2015, pe care completul de judecata
le poate consulta constatand ca cele declarate de mine sunt adevarate cu privire la caracterul
infractional al activitatii asa-zisului procuror Mihaila Paul. Plangerile penale prealabile relevante adica in
legatura cu dosarul 2417/P/2015, 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 sunt indice #4, #5 si #6, asa-zisul
procuror Mihaila Paul fiind urmarit penal in tot atatea dosare penale pentru fapte penale distincte in
fapt dar identice de drept, adica asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul este recidivist, cu "binecuvantarea" unor
asa-zisi procurori din Parchetul de pe langa Curtea de Apel Galati care au avut impresia ca pot
musamaliza vreodata un dosar penal fata de mine, si au devenit inculpati - complici ai asa-zisului
procuror Mihaila Paul in aceleasi dosare in care continua urmarirea penala. In a 6-a plangere penala
prealabila mentionez, am denuntat falsificarea mandatului de aducere din 10.09.2015 din
Pagina 49 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 138
10547/231/2015 in cardasie cu asa-zisul judecator Dinu Murgulet Ana care s-ar fi putut disculpa
spunand ca a fost inselata de asa-zisul Mihaila Paul cu probe inscrisuri ticluite mincinos si relatari
neconforme realitatii, insa a incalcat in flagrant art. 184 (1) din CPP insinuand ca pot fi expertizat
psihiatric pentru presupusa fapta de Ultrajul judiciar, demonstrand ca in realitate Dinu Murgulet Ana
este in cardasie cu asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul si asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, singurii ceilalti
criminali obsedati sa ma discrediteze folosind psihiatria ca o arma impotriva mea, in fapt obsesia
originala provenind de la asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela care si-a instigat colegii de crima organizata in
aceasta privinta, demonstrand prin aceasta ca s-au constituit intr-un grup infractional organizat.
In dovedirea instigarii acestor grave abuzuri de catre asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, in dosarul
15730/231/2014 avand obiectul punerea mea sub interdictie, asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela fara a
depune nici o proba, a declarat in esenta ca cetatenii care-si exercita dreptul fundamental al accesului la
justitie sunt alienati mintal, fapt pe care l-am retinut drept proba de alienare a asa-zisului judecator Dita
Mirela care a jurat sa respecte Constitutia si legile, sa apere drepturile persoanelor, cf. art. 34 din Legea
303/2004, apoi dupa ce a adus aceasta grava atingere imaginii profesionale si prestigiului justitiei a
renuntat la judecata demonstrand rea-credinta prin introducerea unei actiuni vadit netemeinice
impotriva mea.
In dovedire, din referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical falsificata in mod
identic in dosarele 14277/231/2015 si 12718/231/2017 adica fiind acuzat de fapte fictive si ca in mod
fals ca sunt lipsit de discernamant, reiese deasemenea ca tot asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela este cel care
l-a instigat pe asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul la savarsirea abuzurilor legate de procedura in legatura cu
psihiatria, asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul efectuand chiar un apel telefonic mamei mele in primavara
sau vara anului 2015, intreband-o daca sunt nebun. Din formularea de actiuni identice, fiind acuzat de 4
ori si de 3 ori cu incalcarea autoritatii de lucru judecat ca n-am discernamant, reiese ca asa-zisul
procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian deasemenea a fost instigat de Dita Mirela
Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul este deasemenea urmarit penal pentru complicitatea flagranta la
faptele penale savarsite de asa-zisii medici legisti Dicu Serban Dan si Ionescu Natalia de la SML Vrancea
care au savarsit in flagrant Favorizarea faptuitorului, interlopul Herghelegiu Danut care a savarsit in
flagrant tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala pe data de 05.12.2014 impotriva mea,
probat flagrant prin toate procedeele probatorii posibile, si prin faptul ca nu mi-au dat trimitere la
specialitatile medicale corespunzatoare traumei cranio-cerebrale suferite in urma atacului interlopului
Herghelegiu Danut impotriva mea pe data de 05.12.2015, apoi dupa ce suferinta m-a condus la doctori
de la care am obtinut diagnostice si probe materiale investigatii paraclinice, asa-zisii medici legisti Dicu
Serban Dan si Ionescu Natalia mai intai m-au mintit ca nu pot intocmi un nou certificat medico-legal,
apoi la adresa efectuata de d-na avocat Dodoiu Corina catre SML Vrancea, au raspuns in batjocura cu o
completare falsificata a certificatului medico-legal original in care au declarat ca diagnosticele medicale
a doi neurologi, doi neurochirurgi, probele materiale investigatii paraclinice si literatura de specialitate
medicala si medico-legala, sunt toate false. Relevanta acestei relatari este faptul ca asa-zisul medic legist
Lucasievici Silviu care a falsificat expertizele medico-legale psihiatrice nu a actionat in interes ilicit
propriu, ci a falsificat acte juridice avand o intelegere prealabila ilicita cu asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul
si grupul infractional organizat din care face parte si care ulterior a falsificat dosarele 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, grup infractional organizat care in schimbul falsificarii acestor documente,
sa musamalizeze dosarul 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) avand inculpati pe Dicu Serban Dan si Ionescu
Natalia, dosar pe care intr-adevar l-a musamalizat Mihaila Paul pentru care este urmarit penal impreuna
Pagina 50 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 139
cu inculpatii dosarului 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) care au savarsit Falsul in declaratii in flagrant, mintind
ca prin refuzul de a-si face datoria si-au facut datoria. Mentionez si aspectul relevant al faptului ca pe
data de 09.12.2015 in dosarul 2219/231/2015 avand obiectul plangerea impotriva actelor procurorului
cf. art. 340, impotriva ordonantei de clasare ilegale si netemeinice din 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015), am
denuntat d-nei Rodica Neagu presedintele completului de judecata a dosarului 2219/231/2015 faptul ca
din dosar lipsesc aproximativ 40 (patru zeci) de probe, fapt vadit evident mie deoarece jumatate din
probele anexate la dosar sunt poze, ori am inventariat existenta acestor probe prin OPIS-ul de la sfarsitul
petitiei principale precum se uziteaza, si acest inventar se poate efectua verificand si posta electronica
prin care am inaintat probatoriul in conditiile legii la Tribunalul Vrancea, precum am si efectuat o cerere
de informare in acest sens Tribunalului Vrancea
Pagina 51 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 140
Norme metodologice privind activitatea medicului legist in calitate de expert numit de organele
judiciare la solicitarea partilor
Art. 3. În activitatea profesională pe care o desfășoară, în calitate de consilier al părților, expertul
recomandat trebuie să depună toate diligențele necesare în vederea asigurării unei probațiuni
judicire pe baze științifice, cu respectarea metodologiei medico-legale precum și a normelor
deontologice.
In fapt, actele “medicale”, “medico-legale” si altele emise de SML Vrancea, Sectia de psihiatrie a
Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” nu sunt stiintifice deoarece nu au fost intocmite pe baza stiintifice, ci pe
minciunile asa-zisilor medici psihiatri pentru grupul infractional organizat constituit din “organele
judiciare” care au falsificat dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, minciuni
constituind infractiunile de falsurile in inscrisuri, implicit infractiunile de serviciu, infractiunile de
impiedicarea infaptuirii justitiei, infractiunile contra libertatii persoanei, infractiunile de coruptie si
alte infractiuni, declaratii vadit contradictorii prin care asa-zisii medici psihiatri s-au incriminat singuri
penal, cum ar fi de exemplu retinerea ca n-am discernamant, simultan cu retinerile ca am studii
superioare, gandire rapida, cultura generala s.a.m.d., prin care asa-zisii medici psihiatri au demonstrat ca
sunt schizofrenici deoarece au pierdut vadit orice contact cu realitatea juridica, profesionala si socioala,
reprezentand un pericol nu doar pentru public ci si pentru propria persoana incriminandu-se penal
singuri in flagrant, si sociopati sau cu tulburare antisociala de personalitate, fiindca incalca in mod
pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor.
In dovedirea celor declarate invoc literatura de specialitate la sfarsitul acestui punct
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
2. raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 ce nu mi s-a
comunicat in mod ilegal cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002, data la care sau in
prealabil pentru acest raport nu m-am dus personal si nici n-am fost detinut ilegal si adus cu forta ca pe
data de 17.09.2017 prin mandatul falsificat de “judecatorul” Dinu Murgulet Ana din 10.09.2015 din
10547/231/2015 sau pe data de 06.04.2017 prin mandatul falsificat de acelasi “judecator” Dinu
Murgulet Ana din 05.04.2017 din 4791/231/2017 sub pretextul ilegal al unei expertize psihiatrice
imposibil de realizat fara acordul meu, pentru santajarea mea, supunerea mea la rele tratamente prin
privarea in mod ilegal de libertate si tracasare, dar si pentru falsificarea raportului de expertiza medico-
legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015 care in realitate a fost falsificat in
perioada 30.10.2015-03.12.2015 dupa ce clica mafiota ce a falsificat dosarul 2417/P/2014 a pierdut la
contestatie actiunea de internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015. In concluzie la fel, deoarece
examinarea psihiatrica se desfasoara doar prin interviu cf. art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 si pentru raportul
de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 nici macar n-am fost prezent, este
dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-
P/333/09.12.2016 este falsificat precum am demonstrat ca este raportul de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 in dosarul 14277/231/2015 avand obiectul obligarea la tratament medical
respins ca inadmisibil pentru aceleasi motive de nelegalitate si netemeinicie pentru care invoc
inadmisibilitatea actiunii 12718/231/2017;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
3. fisa de externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon”
continand doua diagnostice vadit falsificate cum ca studentia la facultatea de drepet e “psihoza acuta
predominant deliranta “ si “paranoia premorbida”, deoarece nu am fost expertizat psihiatric ci am fost
detinut pe 27.05.2017 de la examenele la facultatea de drept de la centrul Focsani al Universitatii
Ecologice de la Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny” Focsani unde sunt student in anul I de 3 securisti in civil,
am fost incarcerat si legat la psihiatrie fara justificare si fara un diagnostic otravit prin injectare cu
neurotoxine pe baza de fluor si clor adica Haloperidol, Invega respectiv Diazepam si Prazolex. Prospectul
Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea
Pagina 53 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 142
si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific. Pe durata internarii am fost abuzat fizic si Vatamat corporal
si amenintat de asa-zisul psihiatru curant Barbarosie ca daca refuz sa consimt sa fiu “expertizat” si
“tratat” voi fi obligat la fel prin abuz fizic si Vatamare corporala. Am fost obligat astfel prin amenintare
la un test de urina care a demonstrat ca nu ma droghez ci psihiatrii si organele judiciare halucineaza ca
ma droghez din moment ce au dispus un asemenea test in special fiindca nici macar nu m-a acuzat
cineva ca ma droghez, si mi s-au prelevat impotriva vointei mele 3 fiole de sange fara sa reiasa iarasi nici
o problema cum ca ma droghez si prin urmare nici un motiv pentru acest test decat sa fiu Vatamat
corporal precum atesta si intentia asa-zisului psihiatru curant sa ma oblige sa fiu iradiat cu un test CT
care nu este pentru creier ci pentru oasele capului si iradiaza de sute de ori mai mult ca o analiza
normala cu raze X. La asa-zisele examene psihologice am constatat aceleasi intrebari la care am raspuns
la examinarile pentru medicina muncii de mai multe ori sau la recrutare si incorporare in armata, la care
am raspuns in mod identic si fiindca nu am fost diagnosticat de medicina muncii sau de medicina
armatei cu aceleasi diagnostice atunci este dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca fisa de
externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” este falsificata precum
demonstrez prin proba 5 reprezentand pledoaria mea detaliata privind modul in care a fost falsificata
aceasta mai precis prin incalcarea legii si falsificarea in mod generic a realitatii de fapt adica printr-un
delir de termeni psihiatrici aruncati la intamplare fara nici o acoperire in fapte reale cu care ar fi trebui
sa se coreleze aceste inferente pentru a fi valide, motiv pentru care testele se si contrazic tocmai fiindca
sunt fara acoperire in realitatea de fapt si emise de mincinosi diferiti, precum aceste minciuni sunt mai
ales in contradictie cu legea si logica juridica pe care trebuie sa se intameieze toate actele juridice.
Prospectul Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific
inclusiv moartea si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific. Invega este de notorietate conform
prospectului o neurotoxina promovata de o companie americana ca tratament pentru schizofrenie,
companie condamnata repetat pentru comercializarea de otravuri drept medicamente conform
evidentei publice din enciclopedia de pe internet wikipedia.com care referentiaza din presa si evidenta
publica a sistemului judiciar SUA numeroase procese pierdute de aceasta companie, precum si realitatea
puternicei otravuri Invega care provoaca dizabilitati permanente de invatare si memorare ceea ce se
coreleaza cu actul criminal de a ma aresta ilegal de la examenele la facultatea de drept in baza unor
proceduri vadit ilegale deci falsificate precum demonstrez pe scurt prin realitatea de drept ca doar fata
de suspectii si acuzatii de omor sau pruncucidere se poate dispune expertiza psihiatrica cf. art. 184 (1)
din CPP si chiar si atunci aceasta fiind posibila doar cu consimtamantul acestora, altfel cf. art. 4 (2) din
CPP orice indoiala a procurorului se interpreteaza in favoarea suspectului sau inculpatului, existand
numeroase alte moduri de a demonstra gravele abuzuri savarsite de ceea ce se poate numi mafia
magistratilor si tortionarii lor “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici” s.a.m.d., demonstratii pe care le-am
anexat la dosarele penale 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sub forma unei plangeri penale
prealabile impotriva asa-ziselor organe judiciare din dosar, reclamanti si alti complici si instigatori
precum in cazul de notorietate d-l Berbeceanu si-a incriminat si ulterior condamnat acuzatorii mincinosi.
Evident nici unul din diagnostice nu e schizofrenia ca sa fiu “tratat” pentru schizofrenie cu otrava
neurotoxica pe baza de fluor Invega deci iarasi aceasta este o dovada a falsificarii acestui document,
precum insusi faptul ca declararea ca studentia la facultatea de drept e “psihoza acuta predominant
deliranta” si “paranoia premorbida” este vadit o aberatie a regimului totalitar impus de mafia
magistratilor in Romania, dat fiind ca n-am fost intrebat nimic din dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 sau in legatura cu acestea ci am fost arestat de la examenele la facultatea de drept legat si
Pagina 54 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 143
otravit precum s-a retinut in fisa de externare pe care o retin drept proba inscris a acestei stari de fapt
impreuna cu procesul verbal al securistilor in civil care m-au arestat de la Scoala generala “Anghel
Saligny” Focsani unde urma sa sustin examenele la centrul Universitatii Ecologice, iar continutul fisei
falsificate de externare insusi n-are nici o legatura cu raspunsurile mele la testele psihologice, precum
nici macar la audierea contrafacuta a Comisiei care trebuia sa ma puna in libertate conform legii si
evidentelor nu s-a interesat de vadita mea nevinovatie ci membrii acesteia au mintit acuzandu-ma ca
“sunt pericol public” fara nici o dovada sau logica, incalcandu-mi prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2)
din CEDO, si ca sa-si justifice crimele, precum pentru musamalizarea minciunilor lor nu mi-au comunicat
procesul verbal intocmit;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
4. certificatul medico-legal psihiatric din 08.06.2017, ce nu mi s-a comunicat in mod ilegal cf.
art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002 pentru a ma impiedica sa le denunt penal, la comisia
de malpraxis si civil, disciplinar la colegiul medicilor, si sa le contest administrativ la institutul de
medicina legala superior - conform principiului contradictorialitatii orice probe care nu sunt supuse
dezbaterilor in contradictoriu deasemenea nu sunt admisibile, in materie penala cf. art. 349 si art. 351
din CPP. In fapt, am fost dus cu forta iarasi pentru a treia oara (prima oara pe 17.09.2015 si a doua oara
pe 06.04.2017) la Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea pe data de
08.06.2017 dupa ce am fost drogat cu neurotoxinele Haloperidol, Diazepam, Invega si Prazolex 12 zile la
rand motiv pentru care in ultimul examen psihologic am performat doar 98 IQ ceea ce atesta Vatamarea
mea corporala deoarece in conditii normale pot performa in testele de inteligenta 110-120 IQ superficial
si peste 140 concentrat precum am performat la recrutare si incorporare la armata, in diverse teste ale
medicinei muncii sau de pe internet, putand prezenta probe inscrisuri in acest sens la cerere. Prospectul
Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea
si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific. La aceasta falsa examinare fara sa ma intrebe nimic din
dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 asa-zisul psihiatru Lucasievici Silviu a delirat ca “e
clar” si m-au trimis inapoi la Sectia de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon”;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
Pagina 55 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 144
In dovedirea nulitatii actelor “medicale”, “psihiatrice” si orice alte asemenea acte, invoc legea
care statueaza ca toate actele juridice emise cu nerespectarea legii sunt lovite de nulitate conform
Art. 17 din Legea 487/2002 republicata 2012, legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu
tulburari psihice
Pagina 56 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 145
In fapt, rapoartele de expertiza medico-legale sunt falsificate in flagrant precum le-am denuntat
deoarece expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nu a avut loc vreodata, mai intai fiind anulata propunerea
de internarea mea nevoluntara in scopul efectuarii expertizei medico-legale psihiatrice in dosarul
11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, apoi falsificandu-se un raport in lipsa mea
in 2015 in dosarul 2417/P/2014 si alt raport in lipsa mea in 2017 conform ordonantei falsificate de
renuntarea la urmarirea penala din 01.08.2017 din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, si
probabil al treilea raport pe 08.06.2017 care deasemenea s-a desfasurat fara concursul meu deoarece
am refuzat sa fiu expertizat si n-a avut loc nici un interviu, precum n-a avut loc nici o expertiza evident
cand am fost arestat ilegal si netemeinic de la examenele la facultatea de drept a Universitatii Ecologice
ce urma sa le sustin la Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny” de 3 securisti in civil, dupa care am fost legat la
psihiatrie de un pat nejustificat si injectat cu neurotoxine pe baza de fluor si clor pentru a ma face “o
leguma” precum am fost amenintat de apropiatii acestui grup infractional organizat precum am fost
avertizat de prieteni, toate acestea confirmandu-mi ca atrocitatile din Vrancea continua nestingherite in
stil comunist cu protectie de la Bucuresti adica de la guvern in acelasi stil comunist ca si acum 70 de ani.
Mai mult, rapoartele de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrice si celelalte asa-zise acte medicale sunt
falsificate in flagrant in drept, incalcandu-se art. 183(1)(3) din CPP, art. 10, 11, 17 din Legea 487/2002,
adica faptul ca nu pot fi expertizat medico-legal psihiatric decat daca sunt suspect, inculpat sau
condamnat pentru infractiunile de omorul sau pruncuciderea, si este obligatoriu consimtamantul meu
liber dat in scris.
In dovedire invoc legea:
Art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
(1) Evaluarea sanatatii mintale se efectueaza, prin examinare directa a persoanei in cauza, numai de
catre medicul psihiatru.
(2) Evaluarea se va realiza in institutii de sanatate mintala, autorizate si acreditate conform legii.
Pagina 57 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 146
vorba in rastimpul in care am fost Lipsit de libertate in mod ilegal intre orele 9:30 A.M. si 11:00 A.M. in
incinta Judecatoriei Focsani la ordinul ilicit al asa-zisului judecator Badiu Mandica
Art. 11 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
Evaluarea sanatatii mintale se face cu consimtamantul liber, informat si documentat al persoanei, cu
exceptia situatiilor specifice, stabilite de lege, cand persoana evaluata are dificultati in a aprecia
implicatiile unei decizii asupra ei insesi, situatii in care persoana evaluata trebuie sa beneficieze de
asistenta reprezentantului legal sau conventional.
Art. 13 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
(1) Obiectivul evaluarii este stabilirea diagnosticului.
In dosarul 2417/P/2014 asa-zisii medici legisti stiind ca nu pot falsifica aparentele legalitatii si
temeiniciei certificatului medico-legal decat daca-mi dau consimtamantul sa-mi fie pusa la indoiala
sanatatea mintala si sa fiu expertizat medico-legal, s-au constituit intr-un grup infractional organizat cu
asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul care pe data de 17.09.2015 a pus in executare un mandat falsificat din
10.09.2015 din 10547/231/2015, si dupa ce m-a Lipsit de libertate in mod ilegal si Supus la rele
tratamente prin retinerea mea ilegala, privarea de odihna si hrana, supunerea la comportament
irational timp de 7 (sapte) ore, a falsificat alt mandat de aducere numit “de la ora 10:16 din
2417/P/2015”, cu care m-a dus cu mascatii la Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica, ceea ce nu
Pagina 58 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 147
le-a folosit la nimic, deoarece tot nu mi-am dat consimtamantul scris cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP, ceea ce a
determinat urmatoarea situatie:
pe data de 22.09.2015 in baza unor acte juridice falsificate de asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici
Silviu, reprezentand un bilet de internare si recomandare de internarea voluntara, asa-zisul procuror
Mihaila Paul a Hartuit pe mama mea cu mai multe apeluri telefonice, Amenintand si Santajand ca daca
nu ma va convinge sa ma internez voluntar, va falsifica internarea mea nevoluntara cu ajutorul
judecatorului, ceea ce a condus la urmatoarea situatie deoarece am refuzat internarea mea voluntara:
asa-zisul judecator Craciun Contantin Catalin, un fost politist din Vaslui la ordinele ilicite ale
grupului infractional local din Focsani, a falsificat hotararea judecatoreasca din dosarul 11224/231/2015
in fond la Judecatoria Focsani, avand obiectul internarea nevoluntara, prin incalcarea legii si a ratiunii
judiciare, precum am demonstrat formuland contestatie si anuland aceasta hotarare judecatoreasca in
dosarul 11224/231/2015 in contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea.
In fapt, in dosarul 2417/P/2014 nu a fost pusa in miscare actiunea penala, avand calitatea de
suspect care reprezinta faptul ca nu exista probe impotriva mea deoarece precum am demonstrat in
inscrisurile anexate la prezenta, dosarul 2417/P/2014 este inventat de asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela si
asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul in scopul de a savarsit infractiuni impotriva mea, nu de a-l trimite in
judecata unde acestia stiu ca vor pierde.
Mai mult, deoarece asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a avut un episod maniacal si crezandu-se
judecator m-a condamnat pentru o infractiune care n-am savarsit-o prin ordonanta de renuntarea la
urmarirea penala nelegala si netemeinica din 10.12.2015 din dosarul 2417/P/2014 in care a mintit ca am
savarsit infractiunea de Ultrajul judiciar vadit netemeinic deoarece:
1. infractiunea de Ultrajul judiciar nu este o infractiune propriu-zisa, ci o circumstanta agravanta
pentru savarsirea altor infractiuni fata de un magistrat, ori in dosarul 2417/P/2014 nu am fost vreodata
acuzat de o alta infractiune, si
2. in prealabilul emiterii ordonantei de renuntarea la urmarirea penala n-a pus in miscare
actiunea penala, ceea ce se impune cf. art. 7, si art. 314 (1) si art. 318 (1)(2) din CPP pe care le-a invocat,
constat ca nu am nici macar la modul tehnic calitatea de suspect in dosarul 2417/P/2014, adica
in mod nelegal si netemeinic asa cum am fost urmarit penal 12 luni fara sa mi se aduca la cunostinta
aceasta timp de 9 luni din acest rastimp desi era obligatoriu cf. 311 (3) din CPP, implicit in dosarul
14277/231/2015 nu am calitatatea de suspect, si evident nici calitatea de inculpat, intimat, infractor sau
recidivist sau orice alta calitate decat cea de NEVINOVAT
In discutia fondului raportului medico-legal psihiatric falsificat, pe care nu l-am putut retine in
graba deoarece nu mi s-a permis consultarea dosarului 14277/231/2015 decat o scurta perioada de timp
la data de 11.12.2015, in esenta am observat ca asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu si complicii sai
care au semnat "la foc automat" raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica falsificat, au declarat ca
am halucinat faptul ca le-am anulat propunerea de internare ne/voluntara ca nefondata in dosarul
11224/231/2015 in contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, adica faptul ca am demonstrat ca acestia fac parte
din grupul infractional organizat local, si ca elucubreaza ca hotararile judecatoresti, legea, drepturile
persoanelor si sistemul judiciar sunt halucinatiile mele, ceea ce retin drept proba de schizofrenie a asa-
zisului medic-legist Lucasievici Silviu si complicilor sai membri ai Comisiei de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica din cadrul Serviciului de medicina legala Vrancea, care au pierdut vadit orice contact cu
realitatea juridica, profesionala si socioala, reprezentand un pericol nu doar pentru public ci si pentru
Pagina 59 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 148
propria persoana incriminandu-se penal in flagrant, si proba de sociopatie sau tulburare antisociala de
personalitate, fiindca incalca in mod pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor
Mai mult, am demonstrat si faptul ca diagnosticul prezumtiv este falsificat prin faptul ca am
dovedit fondul asa-zisului raport de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica falsificat in mai multe moduri,
fara a aborda toate minciunile proferate de asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu care a redactat
raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatric, pentru a nu urmari proverbiala piatra aruncata in lac si
aglomera dosarul 14277/231/2015. In cel mai scurt mod am demonstrat falsitatea diagnosticului
prezumtiv de tulburarea de personalitate paranoida prin faptul ca aceasta fanfaronada lingvistica se
poate inlocui cu afirmatia ca o persoana este suspicioasa, ori am demonstrat ca nu sunt o persoana
suspicioasa prin faptul ca am discutat cu asa-zisii psihiatri amiabil pe 17.09.2015, fara a considera ca
sunt intr-atat de nebuni incat sa se incrimineze penal in flagrant - evident fiind nebuneste a crede ca nu
unul sau doi, ci 5 (cinci) psihiatri sunt nu doar infractori ci si schizofrenici si sociopati dat fiind ca ocupa
functia de medici psihiatri, dar intr-adevar pe de alta parte, sociopatii aproape intotdeauna se
organizeaza in gasti, ceea ce e doar natural pentru niste animale, si mint in mod obsesiv fiind capabili sa
insele vigilenta unor naivi, sau sa ocupe o pozitie sociala prin fapte penale impotriva libertatii sau fapte
de coruptie, adica mai precis prin Hartuire, Amenintare si Santaj, respectiv prin Darea de mita, Luarea
de Mita si Traficul de influenta
Mai mult, facand abstractie de probatoriul amplu al sanatatii mele mintale depus in dosarul
11224/231/2015 anexat la dosarul 14277/231/2015, dovada scurta prin care spulber orice dubiu cu
privire la sanatatea mea mintala si cel putin ridic suspiciunea legitima a alienarii mintale a procurorului si
membrilor Comisiei, realitate care este de notorietate deoarece am facut publice dosarele penale
privind acesti infractori impreuna cu profilul lor psihologic, dar realitate care nu face decat in mod
indirect obiectul prezentului dosar, e faptul ca eu am formulat contestatia impotriva hotararii nelegale si
netemeinice din dosarul 11224/231/2015 si nu avocatul din oficiu, si anuland propunerea de internarea
mea nevoluntara emisa de asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul si actele juridice emise de asa-zisul medic
legist Lucasievici Silviu, am demonstrat ca am discernamant d.p.d.v. medical si d.p.d.v. juridic spre
diferenta de acestia, conform literaturii de specialitate medico-legala psihiatrice anexate la prezenta
privind tipurile de discernamant
Pentru a elimina orice indoiala asupra sanatatii mele psihice, coroborez dovada faptului ca nu
sunt suspicios ci rational, prin evidenta faptului ca nu am deschis dosar penal asa-zisului procuror
Mihaila Paul si asa-zisului medic-legist Lucasievici Silviu, decat dupa ce au savarsit in flagrant infractiunile
de falsurile in inscrisuri, infractiunile de serviciu, infractiunile de impiedicarea infaptuirii justitiei,
infractiunile de coruptie si alte infractiuni
Pagina 60 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 149
ca nu mi s-a comunicat de fapt la cerere nici un act din dosarele penale cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP, special
pentru a mi se impiedica dreptul la aparare, cerere nesolutionata pe care o invoc drept proba deoarece
priveste inclusiv actele “medicale”, referindu-ma sa mi se comunice toate elementele din dosar
necomunicate de mine la dosar
Pagina 61 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 150
"
Repet din citat: "NU AU ... O VINDECARE IN URMA UNUI TRATAMENT! NEFIIND BOLI..."
Pagina 62 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 151
Mihaila Paul, Tarlea Florin Cristinel, asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, interlopul Herghelegiu Danut si alti
politisti, procurori si judecatori locali. Dosarele 14277/231/2015 si 12718/231/2017 avand obiectul
obligarea la tratament medical iarasi nu au nici o logica juridica, deoarece mai mult de faptul ca
expertiza psihiatrica nu poate avea loc datorita refuzului meu de a-mi da consimtamantul, asa-zisii
psihiatri, “organe judiciare” in cardasie cu asa-zise organe de ordine locale au folosit violenta si
amenintarea cu violenta pentru a ma “obliga la tratament medical” pe 27.05.2017 fara drept adica in
mod ilega, fara diagnostic, arestandu-ma de la Scoala “Anghel Saligny” unde urma sa dau 2 examene la
facultatea de drept a Universitatii Ecologice, legandu-ma la psihiatrie si injectandu-ma cu substante
neurotoxice pe baza de fluor si clor adica Haloperidol si Diazepam precum tinandu-ma si in conditii
septice pentru a ma imbolnavi adica cu oameni ai strazii nespalati dintre care unul l-au pus in pat cu
mine in tentativa de a ma imbolnavi, in masura in care conform regulamentului fiecare pat este atribuit
unei singure persoane, exista un numar maxim de paturi per salon, o distanta intre acestea, se intretin
normele de igienta in spital si curatenia s.a.m.d., nici una din acestea nefiind respectate de oligofrenii
criminali care se dau drept medici la Spitalul “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani, si care conform presei si
constatarilor SRI si ale parchetului general fac experimente ilegal pe “pacienti” adica pe oameni
nevinovati conform evidentei publice ECRIS a dosarelor, adusi cu violenta de “organele judiciare”, alti
psihopati criminali Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat, precum a fost adus d-l Grosu Ulise
care a castigat la CEDO cu privire la aceasta stare de fapt dealtfel
In urma analizei unei analize mai amanuntite a fondului raportului de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 constat in continuare ca este falsificat in flagrant in fapt, deoarece
decompensarea (persistenta) de aspect delirant, inseamna simptomatica (persistenta) a tulburarii
delirante de personalitate. Tulburarea deliranta de personalitate inseamna acel comportament
caracterizat de o idee halucinata adica nereala. Asa-zisii psihiatri declara in esenta ca am halucinat faptul
ca in dosarul 11224/231/2015 propunerea lor de internare ne/voluntara la psihiatrie a fost declarata
nefondata, adica in opinia asa-zisilor psihiatri din Comisia de expertiza medico-legala de la Serviciul de
medicina legala Vrancea, hotararile judecatoresti, legea si sistemul judiciar, toate fata de care acestia nu
au nici un respect in mod evident, sunt halucinatiile mele. Retin aceasta drept dovada a schizofreniei si
tulburarii antisociale de personalitate cu aspect delirant al asa-zisilor psihiatri Lucasievici Silviu, seful
Comisiei de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea, Bezverhnii Igor, Florea Gabriela,
Mihai Oana Georgiana, Luminita Grajdeanu.
Mai mult fiindca asa-zisii psihiatri sunt schizofrenici si sociopati sau cu tulburare antisociala de
persoanalitate cu aspect delirant:
- au pierdut contactul total cu realitatea juridica, profesionala si sociala, reprezentand
schizofrenia, si
- incalca in mod pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor reprezentand sociopatia, si
- nu pot fi convinsi pe cale logica sa adopte un comportament civilizat, reprezentand aspectul
delirant,
precum am demonstrat in baza literaturii de specialitate, acestia in esenta declarand prin
raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica ca am halucinat legea, si mi-am imaginat art. 184(1)(3)
din CPP si art. 10,11 din Legea 487/2002 conform careia nu pot fi expertizat psihiatric daca nu sunt
suspect, inculpat sau condamnat pentru savarsirea infractiunilor de omor sau pruncucidere, respectiv ca
este obligatoriu consimtamantul meu liber pentru expertizarea mea psihiatrica, exprimat in scris, toate
Pagina 63 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 152
aceste conditii nefiind indeplinite, ceea ce in mod convers demonstreaza falsificarea raportului de
expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232, precum si schizofrenia si tulburarea antisociala de
personalitate cu aspect delirant sau sociopatia asa-zisilor psihiatri Lucasievici Silviu, seful Comisiei de
expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea, Bezverhnii Igor, Florea Gabriela, Mihai Oana
Georgiana, Luminita Grajdeanu.
Deasemenea asa-zisii psihiatrici considera ca am halucinat realitatea faptului ca in mod ilegal si
netemeinic asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a propus obligarea mea la tratament medical pentru a ma
pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate si a ma injecta cu substante toxice,
precum dealtfel grupul infractional organizat din care face parte asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul
a procedat prin falsificarea dosarelor 4791/231/2017 si 4909/231/2017 urmarind sa ma interneze la
psihiatrie de Sfintele Pasi in Saptamana Mare, apoi arestandu-ma de la examenele la facultatea de drept
pe 27.05.2017, legandu-ma si otravindu-ma cu substante neurotoxice pe baza de fluor si clor pana pe
data de 08.06.2017,
exact cum am demonstrat ca va proceda inca de cand a incercat sa ma interneze nevoluntar in
acest scop prin dosarul 11224/231/2015 in care am anulat ca nefondata propunerea de internarea mea
nevoluntara la psihiatrie in 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, si prin faptul ca
am fost deja injectat fara acordul meu cu o substanta toxica necunoscuta in zona cotului drept la
serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului "Sf. Pantelimon" de o persoana necunoscuta, in noaptea de 05-
06.12.2015, autorul crezand ca nu voi simti,
dosarul 12718/231/2017 reprezentand intentia criminala a acestui grup infractional organizat de
a ma Vatama corporal grav sau ucide prin otravirea mea cu neurotoxina Invega care conform companiei
care comercializeaza aceasta otrava ca “medicament”, dealtfel condamnata repetat in SUA pentru
comercializarea de otravuri drept “medicamente”, pe langa sutele de vatamari corporale permanente
care le poate produce, poate produce inclusiv moartea precum este documentata aceasta stiintific prin
faptul ca oameni au murit otraviti cu fluor sau asa-zisul medicament Invega, despre care mentionez pe
scurt ca era metoda nazista de a reprima dizidenta in lagarele de concentrare, si despre care mentionez
ca spune in prospect ca trateaza schizofrenia pentru care nu am fost dealtfel diagnosticat, precum nu
am fost diagnosticat ca sa fiu otravit la Sectia de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” in perioada
27.05.2017-08.06.2017, fapt pe care-l probez prin fisa de externare care nu prezinta diagnosticul de
schizofrenia pentru a justifica otravirea mea cu Invega, si nu prezinta nici un diagnostic anterior
perioadei de 08.06.2017 pentru otravirea mea cu Haloperidol, Diazepam si Prazolez in perioada
27.05.2017-08.06.2017, fapt evident probat prin faptul ca sunt declarat fara discernamant dar nu exista
tratament pentru lipsa de discernamant fiindca altfel toata lumea ar lua pastile pentru prostie, si fapt
evident probat prin lege si regulament adica faptul ca nu pot fi diagnosticat in perioada de 27.05.2017-
08.06.2017 pentru datele de 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016, cu atat mai mult cu cat nu am fost intrebat
absolut nimic despre dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sau chiar 2417/P/2014, iar
asa-zisele examene psihologice adica testele de personalitate si inteligenta sunt identice ca cele pe care
le-am dat la medicina muncii si armata, ori fiindca nu am fost diagnosticat in prealabil in concluzie este
demonstrat mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca toate actele “medicale” din aceste dosare penale
mentionate sunt falsificate, fapt certificat prin medina muncii, medicina armatei, probele din dosare
care-mi demonstreaza nevinovatia s.a.m.d.
Mai mult fiindca asa-zisii psihiatri sunt bolnavi mintal, au declarat in primul rand in singurul
document care l-am obtinut de unde era ascuns la arhiva judecatoriei si nu fiindca mi s-a comunicat, ca
Pagina 64 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 153
fiindca PROBABIL am o boala psihica, trebuie sa fiu obligat la tratament medical, ceea ce este dovada
flagranta de irationalitate si opera unor nebuni, prin aceasta propunere incalcandu-se suplimentar art.
107 si art. 108 din CP care statueaza ca un om nevinovat nu poate fi supus la tratament medical
psihiatric, dar si faptul ca tulburarile de personalitate nu sunt tratabile medical precum am demonstrat
mai sus in baza literaturii de specialitate si a unei probe materiale audio-video privind un documentar
asupra acestei realitati coroborate de mai mult psihologi si pacienti
In concluzie fiindca aceiasi “psihiatri” care au falsificat actul “medical” din 2015, au falsificat
precum am demonstrat celelalte acte “medicale”, au falsificat si celelalte acte “medicale” deoarece nu
exista nici o schimbare in modus operandi a acestor infractori
In dovedire privind nelegalitatea si netemeinicia intentarii unei actiuni de obligarea mea la
tratament medical, invoc legea
Cod penal
Dispoziţii generale
Art. 107
Scopul măsurilor de siguranţă
(1) Măsurile de siguranţă au ca scop înlăturarea unei stări de pericol şi preîntâmpinarea săvârşirii
faptelor prevăzute de legea penală.
(2) Măsurile de siguranţă se iau faţă de persoana care a comis o faptă prevăzută de legea penală,
nejustificată.
(3) Măsurile de siguranţă se pot lua şi în situaţia în care făptuitorului nu i se aplică o pedeapsă.
Cod penal
Dispoziţii generale
Art. 108
Categoriile măsurilor de siguranţă
Măsurile de siguranţă sunt:
a) obligarea la tratament medical;
Nu in ultimul rand, o alta proba flagranta a alienarii mintale a asa-zisilor psihiatri o constituie
declaratia "tulburare de personalitate de tip paranoid cu decompensare (persistenta) de aspect delirant",
ceea ce este un pleonasm, fiind in termeni psihiatrici echivalentul diagnosticului de tulburarea de
personalitate de tip paranoid cu aparitia unui grup de simptome (persistente) ale tulburarii de
personalitate de tip paranoid. Decompensare inseamna aparitia unui grup de simptome, si aspect
delirant inseamna convingerea absoluta a persoanei care nu poate fi combatuta cu argumente logice,
dar care este specifica, ceea ce asa-zisii psihiatri nu au precizat deoarece sunt idioti conform etimologiei
termenului idiot provenind din Atena antica, adica indivizi care nu cunosc o meserie si care sunt
dezinteresati de treburile publice
Pagina 65 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 154
Traducere in romana:
“
Un idiot este o persoana dezafectata intelectual, sau cineva care actioneaza defetist sau intr-un mod
semnificativ contraproductiv
...
Un idiot in democratia ateniana era cineva care era caracterizat prin egocentrism si preocupat de afaceri
personale in comparatie antonimica cu treburile publice sau interesul public
“
fapt pe care-l sustin deoarece pe data de 17.09.2015 am ramas cu impresia ca asa-zisilor medici
psihiatri li se pare normal ca cetatenii sa fie niste idioti care-si autocenzureaza drepturile, in alte cuvinte,
sclavi.
de la adresa http://www.la-psiholog.ro/info/tulburarea-de-personalitate-paranoida
definitia tulburarii de personalitate de tip paranoid este:
“
Personalitatea paranoida este un diagnostic psihiatric caracterizat prin paranoia si neincredere
generalizata in altii.
“
Diagnosticul prezumtiv de tulburarea de personalitate paranoida este un fals, deoarece
personalitatea mea a fost caracterizata prin increderea in altii datorata unei prejudecati care cel mai
adesea caracterizeaza oamenii onesti si se numeste naivitate sau ignoranta, urmata de adoptarea un
model superior de gandire analitica care a inlocuit modelul bazat pe instinct privind increderea sau
neincrederea in altii, care a devenit irelevant
de la adresa: http://www.esanatos.com/ghid-medical/psihiatrie/termeni-
psihiatrici/decompensare95181.php
definitia decompensarii persistente este, citez “aparitia unui grup de simptome” persistente
de la adresa: http://www.romedic.ro/delir-tulburare-deliranta
definitia aspectului delirant este, citez: “convingerea absoluta a persoanei care nu poate fi combatuta cu
argumente logice”
Pagina 66 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 155
Mai mult, asa-zisii psihiatri Lucasievici Silviu, seful Comisiei de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea, Bezverhnii Igor, Florea Gabriela, Mihai Oana Georgiana, Luminita
Grajdeanu, au opinat semidoct alte criterii in falsificarea raportului de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica, adica:
Pagina 67 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 156
- "absenta constiintei bolii la momentul actual". Corect romaneste se spune constientizarea bolii, si
fiindca boala nu exista nu am ce constientiza, cu exceptia alienarii mintale a asa-zisilor psihiatri pe care-i
voi pune sub interdictie
- “imprevizibilitate in relatiile sociale”. Aceasta este un fals, deoarece sunt perfect predictibil in relatiile
sociale, si anume la fel ca restul oamenilor civilizati tratez pe toata lumea civilizat, adica ma comport
civilizat fata de prieteni si raufacatori deopotriva, adica spre exemplu raufacatorilor daca savarsesc o
infractiune impotriva mea, formulez plangere penala, respectiv sunt un prieten de nadejde pentru alti
oameni cinstiti, unii dintre care sufera din cauza abuzurilor savarsite de alti asa-zisi psihiatri criminali din
Romania, inhaitati cu crima organizata alcatuita din asa-zisele organe judiciare, motiv pentru care a
aparut sintagma de notorietate “republica procurorilor” referindu-se la aceasta tagma de functionari
corupti aproape in intregime din parchete, ceea ce pot si eu demonstra statistic ca este adevarat.
- “determinare si perseverenta irationale”. Aceasta este un fals, deoarece determinarea si perseverenta
a condus la anularea hotararii de internarea mea nevoluntara de exemplu, deci acestea s-au dovedit a
constitui a fi virtuti intr-adevar. Asa zisii psihiatri in esenta declara ca este irational sa fii determinat si
perseverent in a te comporta civilizat si a fi interesat de progresul societatii civilizate, pentru ca precum
am citat si demonstrat mai sus, acestia sunt idioti, adica lipsiti de pricepere si interes in treburile publice.
- “risc de escaladare rapida de la violenta virtuala si de limbaj la violenta fizica”. Aceasta este un fals,
deoarece nu exista o singura dovada de violenta virtuala si de limbaj, orice ar reprezenta acestea, sau de
violenta fizica. In acest caz recunosc instigarea asa-zisului procuror Mihaila Paul care in mod obsesiv
crede ca poate falsifica realitatea insasi mintind maniacal, demonstrand in consecinta ca este
mitomaniac, ceea ce constituie o simptoma a mai multor tulburari pshiatrice si una din caracteristicile
sociopatiei sau a tulburarii antisociale de personalitate
In concluzie deoarece aceiasi asa-zisi psihiatri au falsificat toate actele “medicale”, cu usurinta
constat ca faptul ca acestia ascund aceste documente de mine tocmai pentru a nu le demonstra in
concret gogomaniile penibile, dat fiind ca oricum am demonstrat ca orice acte “medicale” emise de
acestia sunt ilegale inainte sa incerce sa le falsifice, si netemeinice fiindca n-au dreptul sa le intocmeasca
in lipsa mea si fara consimtamantul meu caz in care acestea nu pot fi decat falsificate
Pagina 68 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 157
medical provizoriu, in scopul de a ma vatama prin injectarea cu substante toxice sau in alte moduri.
Aceste propuneri sunt vadit nelegale si netemeinice, precum a fost declarata nefondata propunerea de
internarea mea nevoluntara in 11224/231/2015 si precum este propunerea identica din 4909/231/2017,
respectiv propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical provizoriu din 14277/231/2015 este
inadmisibila fiindca este nelegala si netemeinica la fel ca cea din 12718/231/2017, deoarece in primul
rand nu sunt condamnat pentru savarsirea omorului sau pruncuciderii ca sa pot fi obligat la tratament
medical in urma unei expertize psihiatrice cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, procedura ce necesita oricum
expertizarea condamnatului cu consimtamantul sau liber cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea
487/2002, neputandu-se dispune un tratament medical in lipsa diagnosticului, respectiv in lipsa
acordului condamnatului, respectiv fara demonstratia stiintifica a faptului ca condamnatul va recidiva.
Deoarece in dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 in care am fost acuzat
de fapte fictive si ca le-am comis fara discernamant, s-a dispus incetarea urmaririi penale, asa-zisele
“organe judiciare” avand episoade maniacale de alienare mintala declarand ca am savarsit Ultrajul
judiciar sau Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei, fara a pune in miscare actiunea penala, fara a intocmi
rechizitoriul si trimite dosarul penal in judecata unde sa fiu condamnat de o instanta impartiala, ceea ce
“organele judiciare” stiau ca n-au nici o sansa fiindca probele dosarelor 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 demonstreaza ca nu am savarsit nici o infractiune, ci asa-zisul judecator
Dita Mirela a savarsit Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare
In dovedire cf. art. 107 si art. 108 din Codul Penal, precum si conform jurisprudentei dosarului
907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu-Marmatiei, nu pot fi obligat la tratament medical deoarece n-
am fost condamnat definitiv, dar si din multe alte motive in fapt si de drept demonstrate in prezenta
Cod penal
Dispoziţii generale
Art. 107
Scopul măsurilor de siguranţă
(1) Măsurile de siguranţă au ca scop înlăturarea unei stări de pericol şi preîntâmpinarea săvârşirii
faptelor prevăzute de legea penală.
(2) Măsurile de siguranţă se iau faţă de persoana care a comis o faptă prevăzută de legea penală,
nejustificată.
(3) Măsurile de siguranţă se pot lua şi în situaţia în care făptuitorului nu i se aplică o pedeapsă.
Cod penal
Dispoziţii generale
Art. 108
Categoriile măsurilor de siguranţă
Măsurile de siguranţă sunt:
a) obligarea la tratament medical;
Pagina 69 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 158
In dovedire invoc principiul dreptului unitar cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romanie si ca
jurisprudenta dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei din care citez conform
articolului de specialitate de la adresa: http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-
ivascu-internarea-medicala-nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-
statului.html
“
La 19 octombrie 2009, procuratura a solicitat instanței pronunțarea unui ordin de tratament psihiatric
obligatoriu. Într-o decizie finală din data de 1 septembrie 2010, Judecătoria Sighetu Marmației a respins
cererea procurorului. Instanța a considerat că, în temeiul articolului 111 din Codul penal, măsurile de
siguranță (cum ar fi admiterea obligatorie într-o unitate medicală și un ordin de a urma un tratament
psihiatric) au drept scop să pună capăt unor situații periculoase și pentru a preveni fenomenul
infracțional. De aceea, ele ar trebui impuse doar persoanelor care au săvârșit infracțiuni prevăzute de
dreptul penal. Prin urmare, un ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus
reclamantului până când nu se va stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a
comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor.
“
Prin hotararea judecatoreasca din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei
probez faptul moral pe care-l consider de notorietate, ca este ilegal a supune o persoana nevinovata la
tratament medical obligatoriu, sau o persoana care beneficiaza de prezumtia de nevinovatie in cazul
meu in calitate de suspect in dosarul 2417/P/2014 avand obiectul Ultrajul judiciar pana la data de
10.12.2015 cand asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a falsificat ordonanta de renuntare la urmarirea penala,
suspect insemnand ca nu exista probe impotriva mea, motiv pentru care am formulat plangere penala
prealabila pentru Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare impotriva asa-zisului
judecator Dita Mirela, deoarece precum am declarat pe propria raspundere in dosarul 2417/P/2014, am
savarsit Calomnia si Insulta in scopul efectuarii Probei veritatii faptului ca asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela
nu corespunde profesiei de magistrat, si textele capcana utilizate nu le-am adresat macar asa-zisului
judecator Dita Mirela ci altor complete, si asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela e cel care a mintit in scopul de
a se victimiza si a atrage in mod ilicit raspunderea mea penala pentru fapte care nici macar nu sunt
incriminate penal, lucru de care eram constient si l-am luat in calcul in premeditarea efectuarii Probei
veritatii. Declaratia mea pe propria raspundere trebuie sa se gaseasca in dosarul 2417/P/2014, depusa
in conditiile legii prin posta electronica, ceea ce probeaza faptul ca am discernamant d.p.d.v. medical si
d.p.d.v. juridic, executand cu succes Proba veritatii prin care am demonstrat ca asa-zisul judecator Dita
Mirela nu corespunde profesiei de magistrat.
Deoarece am declarat pe propria raspundere si demonstrat ca am premeditat efectuarea Probei
veritatii, am demonstrat in flagrant ca asa-zisii medici psihiatri membri ai Comisiei de expertiza medico-
legala psihiatrica mint ca am discernamant mult diminuat, deoarece acestia mintit ca nu sunt constient
de consecintele faptelor mele, ori am demonstrat ca in premeditare am inclus si consecintele faptelor
mele, mai presus de efectuarea Probei veritatii, adica stiind faptul ca nici unul din asa-zisii magistrati
romani nu se supun legii in totalitate, exista riscul de a fi condamnat pentru savarsirea Calomniei si
Insultei in scopul efectuarii Probei veritatii, risc pe care nu mi l-am asumat executand aceasta tehnica a
probei veritatii cu stiinta ca nu exista in prezent Calomnia, Insulta si Proba veritatii in Codul Penal, si mai
mult, m-am asigurat ca conditiile publicitatii si exercitiului functiunii nu sunt intrunite, fiind astfel aparat
din trei parti
Pagina 70 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 159
Mai mult, raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din 2417/P/2014 este antedatat, fiind
emis in perioada 30.10.2015-03.12.2015 si nu pe data de 17.09.2015, conform probelor filele 99-103 din
2417/P/2015 asa cum le-am gasit in 2220/91/2015, adica faptul ca asa-zisul prim-procuror Tarlea Florin
Cristinel le-a comunicat asa-zisilor psihiatri care au falsificat raportul de expertiza medico-legala, faptul
ca le-am anulat in 11224/231/2015 in contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea internarea nevoluntara pe care
au propus-o pentru a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate si a ma vatama sau ucide prin injectarea
cu substante toxice, lovire sau alte moduri, banuiala legitima pe care am demonstrat-o prin faptul ca
- pe 05.12.2015 imediat dupa ce interlopul Herghelegiu Danut a savarsit tentativa de Omor
calificat si Vatamarea corporala impotriva mea lovindu-ma cu capul de perete si aruncandu-ma pe
treptele scarii blocului in stare de inconstienta, am fost injectat cu o substanta necunoscuta de o
persoana necunoscuta, fara acordul meu, la serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului "Sf. Pantelimon",
- jandarmeria a refuzat o data sa sesizeze organul de urmarire penala cf. art. 293 din CPP,
- politia a refuzat e 3 (trei) ori sa sesizeze organul de urmarire penala cf. art. 293 din CPP,
- jandarmeria a falsificat realitatea declarand ca eu l-am agresat pe interlopul Herghelegiu Danut
care a chemat jandarmii, fapt prin care i-am prins in flagrant savarsind nu doar Favorizarea faptuitorului
ci si Falsul intelectual si Uzul de fals,
- respectiv Mihaila Paul, Dita Mirela, Tarlea Florin Cristinel au falsificat mai multe acte de
procedura urmarind:
- in 15730/231/2014 (anulat) punerea mea sub interdictie vadit netemeinic,
- in 11224/231/2015 (anulat) internarea mea nevoluntara vadit netemeinic la fel ca-n
4909/231/2017,
- si in 14277/231/2015 (inadmisibil si nefondat) supunerea mea la tratament medical
obligatoriu vadit netemeinic si nelegal la fel ca-n 12718/231/2017, fiind dovedite prin toate aceste
concursuri de infractiuni ca acesti interlopi s-au constituit intr-un grup infractional organizat pentru
savarsirea de infractiuni, dovezi prin care demonstrez ca raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
este unul din actele falsificate in scopul vatamarii mele, dat fiind scopul acestora vadit nelegal si
netemeinic de a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate si a ma injecta cu substante toxice sau a ma
vatama in alt mod, la fel ca-n cazul tuturor celorlalte acte “medicale” falsificate si ascunse de mine inutil
deorece le-am dovedit oricum falsificate in fapt si de drept
Mai mult, asa-zisii medici legisti mint in raportele de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
infaptuite in lipsa mea ca am istoric judiciar, prin care se subintelege cazier penal, ceea ce nici macar
asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul n-a indraznit sa minta, demonstrand ca boala mintala a asa-zisilor
psihiatri este probabil mai avansata decat a asa-zisului procuror Mihaila Paul, halucinand caziere
inexistente si suspectand oamenii la prima vedere ca sunt infractori, in timp ce ma acuza pe mine de
tulburarea de personalitate de tip paranoid ceea ce conform evidenti ii caracterizeaza pe asa-zisii
psihiatri semnatari ai raportului de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica falsificat
Pagina 71 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 160
care vindeca retardarea mintala, ceea ce e o fantezie si demonstreaza ca asa-zisii medici legisti nu au
discernamant nici ca infractori, luand decizii impotriva propriilor interese ilicite. Mai mult, deoarece in
urma savarsirii tentative de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala savarsita de interlopul Herghelegiu
Danut impotriva mea pe 27.10.2014 si 05.12.2014, am studiat si arealul medicamentatiei psihiatrice
pentru a-mi alevia suferinta fizica si psihica, si am descoperit ca psihiatria este o pseudo-stiinta a mortii,
folosita in general ca arma impotriva intelectualilor sau ca instrument de frauda, ceea ce e mai putin
relevant decat faptul ca medicii psihiatri de pe mapamond habar nu au daca si cum functioneaza
medicamentatia pe care o prescriu, demonstrand prin aceasta ca psihiatria nu este o stiinta medicala
deoarece nu face uz de metoda stiintifica in privinta tratamentelor. Mi-am demonstrat aceasta realitate
involuntar scotand din sarite 80% din psihiatrii cu care m-am consultat, punandu-le in fata anatomia
creierului uman si dinamica neuroendocrinologica a creierului uman, de care asa-zisii psihiatri neavand
habar, si cerandu-le sa prescrie un tratament in functie de simptome si cei trei neurotransmitatori
fundamentali, serotonina, dopamina si noradrenalina, le-am trezit angoasa elevului prost prins la tabla
cu lectia neinvatata. Precizez ca unul din asa-zisii psihiatri din Comisia de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica a declarat convins a pshiatria n-are nici o legatura cu sistemul endocrin, ori de notorietate
existenta stiintei neuroendocrinologia probeaza aceasta legatura
Falsificarea raportului medico-legal psihiatric demonstreaza ca asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici
Silviu si complicii sai nu sunt debili mintal ci alienati mintal, adica sociopati sau cu tulburare antisociala
de persoanalitate, o forma constienta a psihopatiei criminale. Sociopatul este individul care incalca in
mod pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor, si care sacrifica vietile altora in scopul atingerii intereselor
sale ilicite, adesea meschine, ceea ce caracterizeaza pe asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu si pe
complicii sai dispusi sa distruga viata altora in schimbul apartenentei la grupul infractional local, probat
flagrant prin falsificarea certificatului medico-legal psihiatric in schimbul musamalizarii dosarului
1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) avand ca inculpati pe asa-zisi medici legisti Dicu Serban Dan si Ionescu
Natalia
Citez in dovedire literatura de specialitate privind alienarea mintala a asa-zisilor medici psihiatri
Lucasievici Silviu, Bezverhnii Igor, Florea Gabriela, Mihai Oana Georgiana, Luminita Grajdeanu si asa-zisul
organ de urmarire penala Mihaila Paul
5.1. Privind alienarea mintala sau sociopatia al asa-zisilor medici psihiatri si asa-zisul organ de
urmarire penala Mihaila Paul
1. b. de la adresa
http://www.lapsiholog.com/tulburarea-de-personalitate-antisociala.html
citez: “
Pagina 72 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 161
1. c. privind
En. Antisocial Personality Disorder
Ro. Tulburarea antisociala de personalitate
de la adresa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder
citez “
Antisocial (or dissocial) personality disorder is characterized by a pervasive pattern of disregard for, or
violation of, the rights of others.
“
Traducere in romana:
“
Tulburarea antisociala de personalitate este caracterizata e un tipar pervaziv de ignorare a, sau violare a
drepturilor celorlalti.
“
1. d. privind
En. How to Deal With a Psychopath
Ro. Cum sa relationezi cu un sociopat
de la adresa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PNyVwA1ii4
1. e. privind
En. Profile of the Sociopath
Ro. Profilul sociopatului
de la adresa
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
citez: "
NOTE: In the 1830's this disorder was called "moral insanity." By 1900 it was changed to "psychopathic
personality." More recently it has been termed "antisocial personality disorder" in the DSM-III and DSM-
IV. Some critics have complained that, in the attempt to rely only on 'objective' criteria, the DSM has
broadened the concept to include too many individuals. The APD category includes people who commit
illegal, immoral or self-serving acts for a variety of reasons and are not necessarily psychopaths.
DSM-IV Definition
Antisocial personality disorder is characterized by a lack of regard for the moral or legal standards in the
local culture. There is a marked inability to get along with others or abide by societal rules. Individuals
with this disorder are sometimes called psychopaths or sociopaths.
Pagina 73 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 162
Traducere in romana:
“
NOTA: in anii 1830 aceasta tulburare era denumita “nebunie morala”. In anii 1900 aceasta a fost
redenumita in “personalitate psihopata”. Mai recent aceata a fost denumita “tulburare antisociala de
personalitate” in categoriile DSM-III si DSM-IV (termenul provine din en. The Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric Association; ro. Manualul
diagnostic si statistic al tulburarilor mintale, publicat de Asociatia Americana de Psihiatrie). Unii critici s-
au plans ca, in incercarea de a se intemeia doar pe criterii “obiective”, DSM a largit conceptul pentru a
include prea multi indivizi. Categoria sociopatilor include indivizi care au comis fapte ilegale, imorale sau
egoiste pentru o varietate de motive si nu sunt neaparat psihopati.
”
Nota: criticile sunt declarate fara argumente stiintifice pe de o parte, pe de alta parte neavizate adica
nedocumentate in raport cu DSM, pentru ca “varietatea de motive” invocate de raufacatori reprezinta
rationalizarea raului facut, una din caracteristicile psihopatului/sociopatului
“
Definitia DSM-IV
Tulburarea de personalitate antisociala este caracterizata de o lipsa de observatie a standardelor morale
si legale ale culturii locale. Este observabila o inabilitate marcanta de a relationa cu altii si a se supune
regulilor societatii. Indivizii cu aceasta tulburare sunt uneori denumiti psihopati sau sociopati
“
5.2. Privind alienarea mintala sau schizofrenia al asa-zisilor medici psihiatri si a asa-ziselor
organe de urmarire penala
Traducere in romana:
Schizofrenia este o tulburare mintala caracterizata prin comportament social anormal si esecul
de a recunoaste ce este real.
Pagina 74 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 163
Asa-zisii medici psihiatri si asa-zisul organ de urmarire penala Mihaila Paul, au fost prinsi in
flagrant mintind obsesiv, incalcand legea si drepturile altor persoane, in scopul promovarii intereselor
ilicite ale crimei organizate din care fac parte, adica in cardasie si in apararea altor alienati mintal. Prin
definitie, incalcarea in mod pervaziv a legii si drepturilor altor persoane, constituie sociopatia sau
tulburarea antisociala de personalitate, o forma de alienare mintala. Mentionez ca proferarea obsesiva
de minciuni constituie una din caracteristicile sociopatului sau psihopatului, si se numeste mitomania
Fiindca asa-zisii medici psihiatri si asa-zisele organe de urmarire penala au fost prinse in flagrant
incalcand legea si drepturile celorlalte persoane, nu corespund profesional probat flagrant prin lipsa de
competenta profesionala si de bun simt chiar fiindca s-au incriminat penal, adica asa-zisii medici psihiatri
si asa-zisele organe de urmarire penala nu doar ca nu inteleg legea si obligatia de a o respecta, nu
intelege nici datoria de serviciu. Acestora le lipseste cu desavarsire si discernamantul sau intelegerea de
bun simt a normelor societatii civilizate, respectiv halucineaza ca prin minciunile prin care s-a incriminat
penal ca au reusit sa pacaleasca pe cineva
Fiindca prin definitie schizofrenicul este caracterizat prin pierderea contactului cu realitatea,
este astfel dovedit in flagrant ca asa-zisii medici psihiatri si asa-zisele organ de urmarire penala sunt
schizofrenice, deoarece au demonstrat lipsa de discernamant prin incalcarea pervaziva a legii si a
drepturilor persoanelor crezand ca nu vor fi prinsi in flagrant, prin aceasta evident reprezentand un
pericol atat pentru public cat si pentru propria lor persoana.
5.3. Privind mintitul patologic al asa-zisilor medici psihiatri si a asa-ziselor organe de urmarire
penala
De la adresa:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_lying
Pagina 75 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 164
citez:
“
Pathological lying
Diagnosing pathological lying can be very difficult because it has not been recognized as a disorder in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Many other disorders acknowledge pathological
lying as a symptom of disorders such as psychopathy, and antisocial, borderline, narcissistic, and
histrionic personality disorders, but people that are pathological liars may not possess characteristics of
the other disorders.[4] Excessive lying is a common symptom of several mental illnesses.
“
Traducerea in romana:
“
Mintitul patologic
Diagnosticarea mintitului patologic poate fi dificil deoarece nu este recunoscut ca o tulburare de
personalitate de sine statatoare in Manualul Diagnostic si Statistic al Bolilor Mintale. Multe dintre
celelalte tulburari mintale recunosc mintitul patologic ca o simptoma a psihopatiei, si a tulburarilor de
personalitate antisociale, borderline, narcisistica si histrionica, dar oamenii care sunt mincinosi
patologici nu prezinta neaparat celelalte caracteristici ale tulburarilor mintale. Mintitul excesiv este o
simptoma comuna a mai multor tulburari mintale.
“
De la adresa:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_lying
citez:
“
If the disease continues to progress, lying could become so severe as to cause legal problems, including
but not limited to fraud.
“
Traducerea in romana:
“
Daca boala mintala progreseaza, mintitul obsesiv poate cauza probleme cu legea, incluzand dar nefiind
limitate la frauda
“
A. Anexez si indic probele (pe care le combin intr-un singur fisier cu prezenta pentru a asigura
ordinea acestora la tiparire, cu mentiunea ca in cuprinsul fisierului pdf – accesibil cu ajutorul
butonului “Bookmarks” situat in programul Adobe Reader in bara utilitara verticala din stanga - isi
mentin denumirea):
Pagina 76 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 165
Pagina 77 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 166
08.06.2017 ca sa fiu otravit, nu a existat intrunirea Comisiei de etica si consimtamantul meu sa fiu
otravit, nu a existat nici o justificare factuala ca sa fiu otravit, examinarile nu se justifica si se contrazic
intre ele s.a.m.d.
C. Proba veritatii.
- nu s-a efectuat sesizarea din oficiu privind falsurile in declaratii, adica proba veritatii
declaratiilor mele este facuta
- nu s-a efectuat sesizarea din oficiu privind inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare, adica
proba veritatii probelor mele este facuta
01.10.2017
X
Raneti Tudor Andrei
Pagina 78 din 78
ANNEX 20. Page 167
REFERAT
privind fisa falsificata de externare din 08.06.2017, constituind declaratie judiciara sau pe
propria raspundere sub semnatura privata digitala si electronica,
prin care demonstrez categoric ca nu exista nici un silogism sau inferenta categorica care
determina stiintific diagnosticele “tulburare psihotica acuta predominant deliranta - tulburare de
personalitate paranoida (premorbid), expertizare medico-legala ceruta de autoritati” deoarece nu exista
faptele implicit logica din care sa reiasa acest diagnostic, discutand asupra fisei de externare si inferand
obiectivat in incheiere cum aceste diagnostice sunt false, precum internarea mea nevoluntara constituie
infractiunea de Supunerea la rele tratamente si Vatamarea corporala
1. fisa externare: "internat nevoluntar ... si evaluarii starii psihice actuale, fiind adus de Organele
de politie" este un fals prin omisiune, evident neexistand nici o prevedere legala sau un temei in acest
sens adica fapta de care sa fi fost acuzat pentru a conduce la suspiciunea alienarii mele mintale actuale
si necesitatea internarii mele nevoluntare la psihiatrie, in realitate fiind adus de politie la dispozitia
procurorului care a pus in executare hotararea ilegala a Judecatoriei Focsani 4909/231/2017 incalcand
cel putin prevederile art. 184 din Codul de procedura penala cum ar fi faptul ca nefiind suspect sau
acuzat de omor sau pruncucidere nu pot fi supus masurilor de siguranta psihiatrice cu atat mai mult cu
cat cf. art. 4 (2) din CPP privind prezumtia de nevinovatie orice indoiala se interpreteaza in favoarea
suspectului sau acuzatului. De mentionat ca pe 27.05.2017 am fost retinut de la niste examene la
facultatea de drept pe care “Organele de politie" nu m-au lasat sa le dau si la care acum am restanta
In realitate pe data de 18.05.2016 (doua mii saisprezece) ma aflam in sala de judecata ascultand
carti audio de pe telefonul mobil timp de o ora si jumatate cand "magistratii" m-au acuzat de
infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prin aceasta, facandu-mi dosar penal in care sunt vadit
nevinovat deoarece nu am fost trimis in judecata in 30-60 de zile conform Legii 304/2004, dosar prin
aceste "organele judiciare" au falsificat actele de procedura ale internarii mele nevoluntare incalcand
art. 184 din Codul de procedura penala si alte legi pentru o "expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica"
imposibila sau care nu poate avea loc in conditiile legii deoarece nu consimt sa fiu intervievat de un
psihiatru cf. art. 184 din Codul de procedura penala si art. 10 si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, precum
Comisia nu a avut decat consimtamantul meu viciat pe data de 08.06.2017 si nu in scris, informat si
documentat, lipsind deasemenea orice reprezentant de la audiere ceea ce era obligatoriu conform legii
135/2010, art. 184 (3) si legii 487/2002, art. 11
Cf. art. 122 din Regulamentul de ordine interioara al Socola Iasi care este identic cu toate
regulementele din tara fiind act normativ, facand abstractie de faptul ca orice expertizare psihiatrica
este imposibila fara consimtamantul (sincer) al intervievatului cf. art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, expertiza
este oricum valida doar la momentul expertizarii, ori fiindca asa-zisele expertize in lipsa mea adica false
sunt oricum datate la jumatate respectiv peste un an de la data cand s-au inscenat dosarele
2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 adica 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016, expertizele
mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile sunt falsificate precum sunt ilegale din motivele invocate dar
abstractizate din argument
Deoarece a trecut peste un an intre presupusa fapta care evident n-am savarsit-o, nu se justifica
urgenta internarii mele nevoluntare, precum nu exista nici o motivare a urgentei deoarece nu exista,
aceasta constituind proba a gravului abuz criminal la care am fost supus in scopul Vatamarii mele
corporale
Pagina 1 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 168
Deoarece nu se justifica urgenta internarii mele nevoluntare si nu exista nici o fapta care sa
ridice suspiciunea alienarii mele mintale, nu se justifica detinerea mea ilegala in salonul de urgenta doua
zile unde persoane cu probleme mintale urlau si faceau odihna mea imposibila, precum nu se justifica
necesitatea injectarii mea cu antipsihoticul haloperidol, precum si cu diazepam, deoarece nu am suferit
nici o psihoza, ceea ce constituie infractiunile de Supunerea la rele tratamente si Vatamarea corporala
deoarece antipsihoticele este documentat ca provoaca leziuni pe creier si desi am raportat ca-mi este
rau avand frisoane si tremurand incontrolabil de la aceste injectii, acelasi “medic specialist” adica un
tanar fara stiinta si experienta pe nume Puiu ? a ordonat sa fiu injectat din nou
Deoarece nu se justifica internarea mea nevoluntara, nu exista fapta nici suspiciunea legitima
care sa determine masura de siguranta, si deoarece scopul pseudolegal al internarii mele era
expertizarea mea psihiatrica nu Supunerea la rele tratamente, Vatamarea corporala prin obligarea mea
sa iau drogul neurotoxic Invega pe baza de fluor fara consimtantul meu si fara consultarea Comisiei de
etica cf. art. 43 din Legea 487/2002, nu se justifica supunerea mea la “tratament” cu neurotoxina Invega
care conform prospectului trateaza schizofrenia cu care nu am fost diagnosticat, in realitate neavand nici
un diagnostic cand am fost obligat viciindumi-se consimtamantul sa iau Invega, ceea ce mi-a cauzat mai
multe probleme de sanatate cum ar fi in ordinea celor mai grave mi-a creat tulburarea capacitatii de a
invata, memora si gandi, depresie, anhedonia, o stare de angoasa / atac de panica si teroare (asociata cu
obligarea mea constanta sa iau aceasta otrava si detinerea mea ilegala la psihiatrie in proximitatea altor
persoane cu probleme psihice si posibil alte probleme de sanatate), uscaciune in gura si gat si inhibarea
sistemului imunitar ceea ce mi-a dat rosu in gat, uscaciune si mancarime la ochi, dureri de spate.
Afectarea capacitatii mele de a invata, memora, gandi, depresia, anhedonia si atacurile de panica au
persistat dupa externare deoarece drogul Invega actioneaza o lunga perioada de vreme
Pagina 2 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 169
487/2002 inclusiv nemotivat prin faptul ca motivarea sa fiu internat nevoluntar deoarece refuz sa fiu
expertizat nu este o motivare valida
Conform art. 8 din Normele de aplicare a Legii sănătății mintale și a protecției persoanelor cu tulburări
psihice nr. 487/2002, din 15.04.2016
"(1) În cazul în care toate intervențiile terapeutice uzuale folosite pentru a salva de la un pericol real și
concret viața, integritatea corporală sau sănătatea pacientului sau a unei alte persoane eșuează, se
poate recurge la restricționarea libertății de mișcare a pacientului prin mijloace specifice protejate.
(2) Măsurile specifice protejate vor fi aplicate pe principiul minimei restricții, proporțional cu gradul de
pericol.
(7) Pe perioada dispunerii măsurii izolării, pacientul va păstra îmbrăcămintea, precum și orice articole de
uz personal sau cu semnificație religioasă, cu excepția situațiilor în care păstrarea acestora ar putea
afecta siguranța proprie sau a personalului medical."
4. fisa externare: "hipermnezie" (DEX: "Excitație excesivă, patologică a memoriei") este un fals
deoarece nu-mi aduc aminte nimic din expertiza care sa indice aceasta "Excitație excesivă" precum
niciodata nu infatisez asa ceva, nici nu recunosc in hipermnezie un simptom al unor boli psihiatrice
avand literatura de specialitate psihiatrica la dispozitie prin internet, despre care precizez ca exista
interviuri date presei de psihiatri care recunosc ca nu exista boli psihiatrice macar
5. fisa externare: "idei delirante (adica false) de urmarire (adica penala), prejudiciu, persecutie
(DEX: "Urmărire nedreaptă și perseverentă a cuiva")..." este un fals, fiind evident ca am fost prejudiciat
prin internarea mea nevoluntara care e nelegala dar si netemeinica, care este un act de procedura
penala (la propunerea autoritatilor), precum este evident si ca sunt urmarit penal si persecutat prin acte
de procedura penala ilegale si netemeinice precum am demonstrat in dosarul penal dar si verbal prin
evidenta faptului ca sunt acuzat ca am ascultat carti audio la casti, “magistratii” inferand in scris ca am
tulburat linistea in mod silentios ceea ce demonstreaza ca am fost acuzat nedrept, si ceea ce constituie
infractiunea de Represiunea nedreapta, Cercetarea abuziva si alte infractiuni
In realitate fara stiinta mea chiar am fost urmarit ilegal si netemeinic de Biroul de investigatii
criminale care trebuia sa denunte autoritatilor penale pe “organele judiciare” care au falsificat dosarele
Pagina 3 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 170
6. fisa externare: "aprosodie" sau (DEX: "monotonie a vorbirii, în timpul bolii lui Parkinson, în
schizofrenie sau epilepsie") este un fals, deoarece nu am vorbit monoton, desi precizez ca inca imi era
rau de la injectiile cu haloperidol si diazepam care mi-au cauzat cel putin tremur muscular in primele zile
ceea ce m-a traumatizat in conjunctura cu internarea mea in salonul de urgenta unde cel putin 2
pacienti urlau in permanenta, situatie ce am suportat-o primele zile
8. fisa externare: "ostilitate, rigiditate, deficit de modulare afectiva" este un fals in contextul
examinarii psihologice din 29.05.2017 cand am fost cooperant si sociabil. In realitate am declarat inca de
la examinarea comisiei spitalulului care a admis nelegal internarea mea nevoluntara ca sunt constient
prin relatii ca se incearca a mi se da o lectie adica se incearca santajarea mea sa nu mai fac plangeri
impotriva abuzurilor “autoritatilor” impotriva mea, si am promis ca nu mai fac plangeri aflandu-ma in
fata santajului implinit prin detentia in regim psihiatric si supunerea mea la rele tratamente
9. fisa externare: "grafomanie"(DEX: "Tendință patologică de a scrie mult și fără rost") este un
fals fiindca n-am scris absolut nimic la aceasta examinare, si daca se refera la faptul ca am facut multe
plangeri precizez ca am castigat spre exemplu in dosarele 43961/3/2009 prin care m-am reintegrat in
munca anuland o concediere nelegala si netemeinica, 11224/231/2015 anuland internarea nevoluntara
nelegala si netemeinica sau 14277/231/2015 anuland obligarea la tratament medical nelegala si
netemeinica si altele, avand asadar dovezi multiple ca pledarea in apararea drepturilor mele nu este o
"Tendință patologică de a scrie mult și fără rost"
Pagina 4 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 171
11. fisa externare: "amigdalita acuta. rinita cronica" este un fals devenit irelevant dupa ce am
refuzat tratamentul cu antibiotice injectabile care mi-ar fi afectat sistemul imunitar degeaba fiindca in
realitate nu am avut "amigdalita acuta. rinita cronica" ci rosu in gat, ceea ce mi-a trecut. Amigdalita
inseamna amigdale umflate si rinita inseamna ca-mi curge nasul cel putin ceea ce n-a fost adevarat
In realitate aceste minciuni sunt meninte sa musamalizeze faptul ca otravirea cu Invega adica cu
fluor cauzeaza aceasta simptome, si “psihiatri” si coautorii crimelor lor de la ORL stiau aceasta motiv
pentru care au falsificat un diagnostic de "amigdalita acuta. rinita cronica"
12. fisa externare: "Inteligenta nivel mediu QI=98" este un fals deoarece inafara ca este in
contradictie cu restul investigatiilor privind hipermemorie, hiperatentie si altele, acest test a fost dat
dupa 10 zile de “tratament” obligatoriu ilegal cu neurotoxina Invega care trateaza schizofrenia cu care
nu am fost insa diagnosticat, drog care afecteaza negativ memoria si capacitatea de concentrare,
precum si detentia in regim psihiatric nevoluntar mi-a afectat intelectul negativ fiind traumatizat prin
supunerea la rele tratamente. Mentionez ca am studii superioare si in realitate coeficientul meu de
inteligenta este superficial 110-120 corespondent studiilor superioare, si concentrat peste 140, ceea ce
demonstreaza ca am fost Vatamat corporal prin obligarea sa iau otrava Invega, putand produce dovezi
si dinainte de la testele de inteligenta la recrutare si incorporare a coeficientului meu de inteligenta real
care a crescut in urma absolvirii de studii superioare intre timp, precum si dovezi ulterioare Vatamarii
mele corporale de la Sectia de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani
Cf. art. 43 din Legea 487/2002 “Studiile clinice si tratamentele experimentale, psihochirurgia sau
alte tratamente susceptibile sa provoace vatamari integritatii pacientului, cu consecinte ireversibile, nu
se aplica unei persoane cu tulburari psihice decat cu consimtamantul acesteia, in cunostinta de cauza, si
cu conditia aprobarii de catre comitetul de etica din cadrul unitatii de psihiatrie, care trebuie sa se
declare convins ca pacientul si-a dat consimtamantul, in cunostinta de cauza, si ca acesta raspunde
interesului pacientului.”
In realitate nu doar ca mi-a fost viciat consimtamantul si am indicat aceasta in scris consemnand
faptul ca sunt detinut ilegal la psihiatrie, am solicitat adesea verbal sa nu fiu supus “tratamentului” adica
otravirii cu pastile cu clor si fluor deoarece imi face rau psihic si fizic – Invega are numeroare efecte
secundare negative permanente documentate in cele peste 100 de pagini ale prospectului sau, inclusiv
produce moartea, si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific
13. fisa externare: "instabilitate emotionala" este un fals precum pun aceasta in contradictie cu
celalalt psiholog care a retinut "aprosodie" precum am precizat la punctul 6. Nu am avut nici un
comportament in acest sens
14. fisa externare: "toleranta scazuta la frustrare" este un fals. Nu am avut nici un
comportament in acest sens
Pagina 5 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 172
15. fisa externare: "ideatie usor dezorganizata cu idei de persecutie" este un fals, vezi punctul 5
16. fisa externare: "comportament instabil" este un fals. Nu am avut nici un comportament in
acest sens
17. fisa externare: "relatii interpersonale deficitate" este un fals - imi amintesc ca inafara de
faptul ca am fost sociabil, am socializat cu ceilalti pacienti si la examinare am relatat relatiile cu prietenii
mei la interpelarea psihologului
18. fisa externare: "tratament neuroleptic: ... Invega" e pentru schizofrenie nu pentru
diagnosticul meu, cu mentiunea ca mi s-a administrat obligatoriu cu vicierea consimtamantului meu
aproximativ 10 zile din cate tin minte, si precizez ca Invega are efecte secundare negative documentate
pe peste 100 de pagini in prospectul sau
Cf. art. 43 din Legea 487/2002 “Studiile clinice si tratamentele experimentale, psihochirurgia sau
alte tratamente susceptibile sa provoace vatamari integritatii pacientului, cu consecinte ireversibile, nu
se aplica unei persoane cu tulburari psihice decat cu consimtamantul acesteia, in cunostinta de cauza, si
cu conditia aprobarii de catre comitetul de etica din cadrul unitatii de psihiatrie, care trebuie sa se
declare convins ca pacientul si-a dat consimtamantul, in cunostinta de cauza, si ca acesta raspunde
interesului pacientului.”
In realitate nu doar ca mi-a fost viciat consimtamantul si am indicat aceasta in scris consemnand
faptul ca sunt detinut ilegal la psihiatrie, am solicitat adesea verbal sa nu fiu supus “tratamentului” cu
pastile deoarece imi face rau psihic si fizic
19. fisa externare: "refuza ... examinarea CT". Mentionez ca CT este pentru vizualizarea structurii
osoase nu pentru substanta moale adica pentru creier, fiind indicat de fapt RMN deoarece nu prezinta
radioactivitate
20. fisa externare: "recomandari... Invega" este un fals deoarece nu am fost diagnosticat cu
schizofrenie precum atesta fisa de externare. Prospectul Invega indica faptul ca trateaza schizofrenia, si
are o multitudine de efecte negative asupra memoriei si capacitatii de a invata
Cf. art. 43 din Legea 487/2002 “Studiile clinice si tratamentele experimentale, psihochirurgia sau
alte tratamente susceptibile sa provoace vatamari integritatii pacientului, cu consecinte ireversibile, nu
se aplica unei persoane cu tulburari psihice decat cu consimtamantul acesteia, in cunostinta de cauza, si
cu conditia aprobarii de catre comitetul de etica din cadrul unitatii de psihiatrie, care trebuie sa se
declare convins ca pacientul si-a dat consimtamantul, in cunostinta de cauza, si ca acesta raspunde
interesului pacientului.”
Pagina 6 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 173
In realitate nu doar ca mi-a fost viciat consimtamantul si am indicat aceasta in scris consemnand
faptul ca sunt detinut ilegal la psihiatrie, am solicitat adesea verbal sa nu fiu supus “tratamentului” cu
pastile deoarece imi face rau psihic si fizic
21. fisa externare: "evitarea ... consumului de toxice" este un fals deoarece testul toxicologic a
confirmat faptul ca nu sunt toxicoman. Invega este toxic
Cf. art. 43 din Legea 487/2002 “Studiile clinice si tratamentele experimentale, psihochirurgia sau
alte tratamente susceptibile sa provoace vatamari integritatii pacientului, cu consecinte ireversibile, nu
se aplica unei persoane cu tulburari psihice decat cu consimtamantul acesteia, in cunostinta de cauza, si
cu conditia aprobarii de catre comitetul de etica din cadrul unitatii de psihiatrie, care trebuie sa se
declare convins ca pacientul si-a dat consimtamantul, in cunostinta de cauza, si ca acesta raspunde
interesului pacientului.”
In realitate nu doar ca mi-a fost viciat consimtamantul si am indicat aceasta in scris consemnand
faptul ca sunt detinut ilegal la psihiatrie, am solicitat adesea verbal sa nu fiu supus “tratamentului” cu
pastile deoarece imi face rau psihic si fizic
22. In concluzie nu exista nici un silogism sau inferenta categorica care determina stiintific
diagnosticele “tulburare psihotica acuta predominant deliranta - tulburare de personalitate paranoida
(premorbid), expertizare medico-legala ceruta de autoritati” deoarece nu exista faptele din care sa
reiasa acest diagnostic. Cand am stat de vorba cu oricine din psihologi / psihiatri nu am fost vreodata
interogat cu privire la continutul dosarelor penale 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 in care s-a
cerut expertiza, ci am fost interogat despre viata mea in general, ori diagnosticul desemneaza prezentul.
In dovedire exemplific citand din motivele neobiectivate: "idei delirante (false) de urmarire (penala),
prejudiciu...", fiind evident ca am fost prejudiciat prin internarea mea nevoluntara care e nelegala dar si
netemeinica, care este un act de procedura penala (“la propunerea autoritatilor”)...
“
Cauze nonpsihiatrice
“
Deaorece nu am boli si nu consum droguri, diagnosticul este fals adica inferenta este falsa derivand din
premize false
Pagina 7 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 174
Cauze psihiatrice:
tulburări afective, schizofrenia, tulburarea schizofreniformă, psihozele scurte reactive
“
Deoarece nu am “tulburări afective, schizofrenia, tulburarea schizofreniformă, psihozele scurte reactive”
nefiind obiectivate nici una din acestea, indicandu-se doar ca credinta mea ca am drepturi si inclusiv
dreptul de a mi le exercita este o credinta falsa ceea ce este o declaratie vadit falsa deoarece in Romania
statul de drept este normalitatea acceptata sau practica majoritara indiferent de abuzurile
“autoritatilor”
este dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca premizele diagnosticului sunt false si prin
urmare inferenta silogistica sau categorica este falsa adica diagnosticul “tulburare psihotica acuta
predominant deliranta“ este fals
Pagina 8 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 175
conventional cf. art. 45 din Legea 487/2002, ci mi s-a aplicat “tratamentul” tipic dizidentilor in era
comunista
C. Proba veritatii.
- nu s-a efectuat sesizarea din oficiu privind falsurile in declaratii, adica proba veritatii
declaratiilor mele este facuta
- nu s-a efectuat sesizarea din oficiu privind inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare, adica
proba veritatii probelor mele este facuta
Pagina 9 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 176
01.10.2017
X
Raneti Tudor Andrei
Pagina 10 din 10
ANNEX 20. Page 177
Domnule presedinte,
subsemnatul Raneti Tudor Andrei , domiciliat in Bucuresti bd. Theodor Pallady nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc.
B, et. 6, apt. 61, sectorul 3, unde nu locuiesc din 2009, identificat cu B.I./C.I. seria RT nr. 654712 emis de
SPCEP S3 biroul nr. 4 la data de 04.09.2009 si avand C.N.P. 1801010394508, cu adresa de
corespondenta electronica aleasa cf. art. 257 (5), art. 259 (1) si art. 289 (5) din CPP modificat si
completat prin OUG nr. 3/2014: tudor.raneti@gmail.com,
Pagina 1 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 178
vatama corporal si atat, concluzia fiind atunci ca “psihiatrii” delireaza cu sau fara rea-credinta fiind niste
sarlatani odiosi care sacrifica vietile altora pentru a-si justifica interesele ilicite ceea prin definitie
constituie sociopatia), iar in special otrava neurotoxica Invega pentru care nu am fost diagnosticat ca
sa fiu otravit 10 zile cu ea cand am fost arestat ilegal si netemeinic de 3 securisti in civil de la
examenele la facultatea de drept a Universitatii Ecologice pe 27.05.2017, este comercializata de o
companie SUA condamnata de mai multe ori pentru comercializarea de otravuri drept “medicamente”,
fapt cunoscut de notorietate conform presei. Aceasta constituie si o incalcare a art. 2 din CEDO fiind
neconstitutional cf. art. 11 si art. 20 din CR, si
deoarece aceste articole conform paragrafului anterior sunt prin urmare neconstitutionale cf.
art. 11 si art. 20 din CR constituind o incalcare a dreptului de a nu fi supus torturii si la tratament
inuman sau degradant cf. art. 3 din CEDO, dat fiind ca am fost Vatamat corporal in perioada 27.05.2017-
08.06.2017 precum am descris in intampinarea la 12718/231/2017 atasata si precum este probat in
dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016
deoarece asa-zisul tratament psihiatric pentru iresponsabilitate sau lipsa de discernamant
precum vadit ridicol deoarece daca ar exista tratament pentru prostie toata lumea ar lua pastile, si
incarcerarea la psihiatrie este echivalentul incarcerarii la penitenciar adica lipsirea de libertate in cazul
meu deoarece am fost detinut ilegal constituind infractiunea de Lipsire de libertate in mod ilegal, cu
exceptia faptului ca discutabil la penitenciar nu esti otravit de psihopati din start si nu esti nevoit sa fii
torturat psihic traind zilnic printre acesti psihopati criminali autointitulati “medici psihiatri”, in fapt
incarcerarea la psihiatrie constituind si infractiunea de Supunerea la rele tratamente prin obligarea la
un stil de viata degradant precum si torturarea psihica si vatamarea corporala prin amenintarea cu
violenta si uzul de violenta pentru a-ti administra singur otravurile be baza de fluor ca Invega precum
acesti criminalii au procedat in cazul meu, fara nici o justificare legala sau factuala adica incalcand legea
si fara sa fiu diagnosticat drept dovada a relei credinte si impasibilitatii totale fata de moralitate si lege,
tipica psihopatilor si sociopatilor. Aceasta constituie incalcarea flagrant a art. 23 (1) din CR privind
libertatea individuala, prin incalcarea in mod arbitrat a dreptului de a fi liber, deoarece psihiatria este
vadit o sarlatanie deoarece incarcereaza oameni nevinovati sub pretextul “expertizei psihiatrice” care
este evident o prostie, fiindca nu poate avea loc fara consimtamantul intervievatului psihiatric, si oricum
sociopatii adica adevaratele cazuri psihiatrice sunt mitomaniaci adica mint, precum de regula insasi
psihiatrii sau sarlatanii care sacrifica vietile altora pentru a-si justifia propria existenta, sunt sociopati.
Aceasta constituie si o incalcare a art. 5 din CEDO fiind neconstitutional cf. art. 11 si art. 20 din CR, si
deoarece “organele judiciare” planuiesc sa ma Vateme corporal grav sau sa ma omoare
deoarece acesta este efectul otravii neurotoxice Invega pe termen lung precum a fost documentat in
prospect si precum este demonstrat stiintific de notorietate ca “tratamentul” antipsihotic nu face
altceva decat sa distruga creierul, dovedit prin faptul ca m-au otravit deja in perioada 27.05.2017-
08.06.2017 si m-au Vatamat corporal, evident imi incalca dreptul la viata de orice fel, inclusiv dreptul de
a-mi intemeia o familie deoarece otrava neurotoxica Invega provoaca inclusiv impotenta si anhedonia,
adica incapacitatea de a avea copii prin distrugerea functionalitatii organelor reproductive precum
instaleaza si depresia cronica - fluorul nu are nici o functie biologica, fiind o puternica otrava neurotoxica
in primul rand, si fiind toxica in general pentru orice forma de viata. Prin urmare articolele
neconstitutionale sunt si in contradictie cu art. 26 din Constitutia Romaniei, precum si cf. art. 11 si art.
20 din CR cu art. 8 din CEDO
deoarece aceste articole sunt neconstitutionale datorita contradictiei intre acestea si principiul
legalitatii cf. art. 1 (5) din Constitutia Romaniei, adica contradictia dintre acestea si legea suprema
Pagina 2 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 179
Constitutia adica drepturile fundamentale, la viata, integritate fizica si psihica cf. art. 22 din CR, la
libertate individuala cf. art .23 (1) din CR, prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 23 (11) din CR, la viata
privata si familie cf. art. 26 din CR, precum sunt neconstitutionale cf. art. 1 (5) din Constitutia Romaniei
deoarece sunt contradictorii cu actele normative privind aceste norme precum si cu logica juridica din
acest motiv, conform principiilor non-contradictiei si tertului exclus, aceste articole nu pot fi legale fara
sa contrazica legea, deci sunt ilegale sau nule de forta juridica din punct de vedere constitutional, motiv
pentru care se impune abrogarea acestora. Acestea sunt neconstitutionale si cf. art. 11 si art. 20 din CR
raportat la art. 1 din CEDO prin urmare, si
deoarece incalcarea CEDO si a drepturilor fundamentale cf. Constitutiei Romaniei prin folosirea
arbitrara a articolelor declarate neconstitutionale in prezenta este neconstitutional cf. art. 11 si art. 20
din CR constituind si incalcarea dreptului la un proces echitabil cf. art. 6 din CEDO raportat la insemnand
dreptul de a fi judecat de o instanta impartiala deoare n-am fost judecat de loc si prin urmare prin
intentarea obligarii la tratament medical mi s-a incalcat dreptul la prezumtia de nevinovatie, iar pe
parcursul asa-zisului proces penal mi s-a incalcat grosolan dreptul la aparare prin necomunicarea actelor
de procedura obligatorii a se comunica adica ordonante, acte “medicale” si toate probele “impotriva
mea” care de fapt nu exista fiindca toate probele din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia, respectiv
inclusiv nu s-a sustinut confruntarea cf. art. 113 din CPP dat fiind ca marturiile sunt aberante si chiar
daca nu contribuie la acuzarea impotriva mea, contribuie la acuzarea mea impotriva asa-ziselor organe
judiciare si la lamurirea cauzei implicit, si
deoarece incalcarea CEDO si a drepturilor fundamentale cf. Constitutiei Romaniei prin folosirea
arbitrara a articolelor declarate neconstitutionale in prezenta este neconstitutional cf. art. 11 si art. 20
din CR constituind si incalcarea dreptului de a nu fi pedepsit decat conform legii cf. art. 7 din CEDO.
Deoarece sunt acuzat de fapte fictive si vadit imposibile conform logicii si probelor de la dosar, evident
sunt nevinovat deoarece faptele fictive nu sunt incriminate penal. Mai mult, asa-zisa medicina adica
sarlatania numita psihiatrie utilizata in acest caz si nu numai ca arma de represiune nedreapta pentru
musamalizarea adevarului despre crimele “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” si
“jandarmilor” din “provincia europeana” Vrancea ca-n lagarele naziste de unde provine in special
otravirea cu fluor, nu poate fi folosita ca pedeapsa deoarece nu pedepsirea este rolul legal al medicinei
conform juramantului lui Hipocrate, ceea ce daca ar fi, ar fi neconstitutional cf. art. 22 din CR privind
dreptul la integritatea fizica si corporala. Nu in ultimul rand doctrinar “tratamentul psihiatric” este
administrat ucigasilor ceea ce releva obsesia criminala a “organelor judiciare” care au falsificat actiunea
de obligarea la tratament medical in scopul de a ma Vatama corporal pentru a ma reduce la tacere cu
privire la crimele lor impotriva mea din aceste dosare si din prealabil pe care incearca sa le
musamalizeze astfel, si
deoarece incalcarea CEDO si a drepturilor fundamentale cf. Constitutiei Romaniei prin folosirea
arbitrara a articolelor declarate neconstitutionale in prezenta este neconstitutional cf. art. 11 si art. 20
din CR constituind si dreptul la libertatea gandirii, constiinta si la libertatea religiei cf. art. 9 din CEDO.
Prin obligarea mea la “tratament medical” adica la Vatamarea corporala grava precum demonstrez in
prezenta, imi este incalcata total libertatea gandirii, constiinte si la practica libera a religiei prin
distrugerea creierului si in cele din urma uciderea mea prin otravirea mea cu neurotoxine pe baza de
clor si fluor nejustificat legal sau factual precum grupul infractional organizat care a falsificat dosarele
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 a procedat in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017. Cu
mentiunea ca mi s-a refuzat expres libertatea religioasa in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 prin refuzul
“psihiatrilor” de a permite sa primesc o carte de rugaciuni de la mama mea, si
Pagina 3 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 180
Pagina 4 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 181
Pe scurt asa-zisele organe judiciare si asa-zisii medici psihiatri urmaresc sa ma distruga deoarece
fiind credincios in gandire si constiinta statului si ordinii de drept, le-am denuntat crimele impotriva mea
din propriu interes la autoritatile penale, precum si public din patriotism motiv pentru care acestia au
proferat aberatii adesea cu privire la articolele mele de pe internet privind activitatea lor criminala. In
acest scop si in flagrant mi-au cenzurat forumul militia.freeforums.net, si au incercat sa-mi cenzureze
contul de facebook, simultan cu arestarile mele ilegale din 06.04.2017, 10.04.2017 si tentativele de a ma
interna la psihiatrie din 13 si 14.04.2017 in Saptamana Mare adica de Sfintele Pasti, la fel pentru a-mi
batjocori viata religioasa si de familie in tipic stil mafiot
Solicit anexarea la prezenta cel putin a intampinarii la dosarul 12718/231/2017 (daca este
sustrasa de “organele judiciare” vrancene desi o anexez) care infatiseaza realitatea de fapt a dosarelor
falsificate impotriva mea 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 pentru ca “organele
judiciare” sa savarseasca gravele abuzuri din dosarele 10547/231/2015 (-4791/231/2017),
11224/231/2015 (-4909/231/2017), 14277/231/2017 (-12718/231/2017), dintre care in majoritatea
drept dovada am castigat adica in 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 (fond + contestatie)
demonstrand ca si celelalte dosare cu acuzatii identice de savarsirea de fapte fictive fara discernamant
sunt false. Relevanta acestui inscris este demonstratia detaliata a neconstitutionalitatii articolelor
invocate ca neconstitutionale, precum si obiectivarea legaturii cu cauza
Pagina 5 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 182
precum indic faptul ca art. 315 (2) e) din CPP este contradictoriu cu art. 566-572 din CPP
deoarece doar in situatia in care pacientul se sustrage Vatamarii sale corporale poate fi obligat la
internarea nevoluntara, ceea ce demonstreaza obsesisia criminala a mafiei care a falsificat mai mult ani
aceste dosare sa ma lichideze pentru ca sa nu le denunt atrocitatile, acestia avand o veritabila
organizatie criminala, facand experimente nelegale pentru bani de la mafia farmaceutica probat printr-
un comunicat de presa al PICCJ in baza unui raport SRI, pentru care condamna si drogheaza oameni
nevinovati precum am demonstrat in baza evidentei ECRIS (dupa care aceasta mafie a ascuns dosarele
de gen mai putin pe ale mele incercand sa ma discrediteze, probandu-si doar dolul prin aceasta insa),
sau prin dosarul CEDO Grosu Ulise vs Romania care demonstreaza utilizarea psihiatriei ca arma de
represiune nedreapta a adevarului in “provincia europeana” Vrancea, si precum demonstreaza dosarele
mele falsificate de acest grup infractional organizat, probat in documentul solicitat a se anexa la
prezenta adica intampinarea la dosarul 12718/231/2017
Invoc art. 566-572 din CPP si altele asemenea cum art. fi art. 245-246 din CPP care definesc
doctrina judiciara in aceasta speta, si drept dovada a incoerentei in practica a acestor articole de lege
care trebuie sa contina precizari deoarece prin reducere la absurd ca aberatiile “psihiatrilor” ar fi
adevaruri in sensul ca sunt iresponsabil si n-am discernamant, o persoana lipsita de discernamant nu se
poate orienta pentru ca “sa se prezinte de indata la unitatea sanitara la care urmeaza sa i se efectueze
tratamentul” ceea ce iarasi demonstreaza prostia incomensurabila a acestor “psihiatri” lipsiti de
discernamant in sensul inabilitatii de a formula chiar si un plan criminal, argument coroborat cu faptul
de notorietate ca nu exita tratament medical psihiatric pentru iresponsabilitate si lipsa de discernamant
cu otrava neurotoxica Invega pe baza de fluor care provoaca iresponsabilitate si lipsa de discernamant
prin distrugerea creierului si a sanatatii in general, fiind documentata inclusiv moartea in prospectul
Invega, motiv pentru care acest grup infractional organizat intentioneaza sa ma Vateme corporal pe
termen lung si permanent, sau sa ma ucida astfel pentru a ma reduce la tacere cu privire la crimele lor,
precum apropriatii lor m-au amenintat ca “ma fac leguma”, si precum m-au avertizat si prietenii privind
atrocitatile comunistoide care continua in Vrancea si dupa 70 de ani de la instalarea regimului totalitar
comunist, adica analogic un regim totalitar mafiot cu legimitate de stat de drept sub care-si ascunde
activitatea criminala, vanzand insa de notorietate toate resursele tarii, minerale, agricole sau umane...
Aceste articole sunt neconstitutionale in raport cu prezumtia de nevinovatie stabilita prin art. 23
(11) din Constitutia Romaniei, citez:
“Până la rămânerea definitivă a hotărârii judecătoreşti de condamnare, persoana este considerată
nevinovată”,
si fiindca nu am fost condamnat si nici macar trimis in judecata, sunt nevinovat si prin urmare nu
se poate infera ca am savarsit fapte fictive fara discernamant decat daca “organele judiciare” si
“psihiatrii” sunt alienati mintal demonstrand lipsa discernamantului juridica prin lipsa oricarei logici
juridice in actele pe care le-au falsificat in flagrant, precum dealtfel atesta realitatea de fapt a dosarelor
enumerate mai jos, si
nici fapta nu exista fizic in special daca exista un singur suspect sau inculpat in cauza deoarece
daca singurul acuzat sau suspect este nevinovat de savarsirea faptei, evident nimeni altcineva nu este
vinovat si in mod logic nici fapta nu poate exista deoarece daca este declarata inexistent efectul, nici
cauza efectului nu exista,
Pagina 6 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 183
mai ales daca probatoriul, legea si situatia de fapt a dosarului demonstreaza nevinovatia
suspectului sau a inculpatului ca in cazul meu in care “organele judiciare” in cardasie cu “medici legisti”
si “psihiatri” au falsificat dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 impotriva
mea pentru a savarsi gravele abuzuri din dosarele 10547/231/2015 (-4791/231/2017), 11224/231/2015
(-4909/231/2017), 14277/231/2017 (-12718/231/2017), dintre care in majoritatea drept dovada am
castigat adica in 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 (fond + contestatie) demonstrand ca si celelalte
dosare cu acuzatii identice de savarsirea de fapte fictive fara discernamant sunt false
conform
Articolul 20 din Constitutia Romaniei
(1) Dispoziţiile constituţionale privind drepturile şi libertăţile cetăţenilor vor fi interpretate şi aplicate în
concordanţă cu Declaraţia Universală a Drepturilor Omului, cu pactele şi cu celelalte tratate la care
România este parte.
(2) Dacă există neconcordanţe între pactele şi tratatele privitoare la drepturile fundamentale ale omului,
la care România este parte, şi legile interne, au prioritate reglementările internaţionale, cu excepţia
cazului în care Constituţia sau legile interne conţin dispoziţii mai favorabile.
precum art. 315 (2) e) din CPP raportat la art. 16 (1) d) raportat la art. 566-572 din CPP si alte
articole din speta obligarii la tratament medical sunt in contradictoriu cu urmatoarele legi mai precis
acte normative ce definesc aplicarea legi supreme Constitutia:
art. 4 din Codul de procedura penala
Orice persoană este considerată nevinovată până la stabilirea vinovăţiei sale printr-o hotărâre
penală definitivă.
art. 99 din Codul de procedura penala
Suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiază de prezumţia de nevinovăţie, nefiind obligat să îşi
dovedească nevinovăţia, şi are dreptul de a nu contribui la propria acuzare.
Pagina 7 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 184
Pagina 8 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 185
psihiatric” este administrat ucigasilor cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP ce face derogare de la art. 4 (2) din CPP
ceea ce releva obsesia criminala a “organelor judiciare” care au falsificat actiunea de obligarea la
tratament medical in scopul de a ma Vatama corporal pentru a ma reduce la tacere cu privire la crimele
lor impotriva mea din aceste dosare si din prealabil pe care incearca sa le musamalizeze astfel
In dovedire precizez, cf. art. 43 din Legea 487/2002 “Studiile clinice si tratamentele
experimentale, psihochirurgia sau alte tratamente susceptibile sa provoace vatamari integritatii
pacientului, cu consecinte ireversibile, nu se aplica unei persoane cu tulburari psihice decat cu
consimtamantul acesteia, in cunostinta de cauza, si cu conditia aprobarii de catre comitetul de etica din
cadrul unitatii de psihiatrie, care trebuie sa se declare convins ca pacientul si-a dat consimtamantul, in
cunostinta de cauza, si ca acesta raspunde interesului pacientului.”
Declar pe propria raspundere ca nu mi-am dat niciodata acordul sa fiu expertizat sau Vatamat
corporal cu otravurile “medicinei psihiatrice” cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP, art. 11 din Legea 487/2002 si art.
43 din Legea 487/2002, precum atesta chiar ordonanta falsificata de clasare din 2417/P/2014,
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016. Nu s-a intrunit vreodata o Comisie de etica desi am
protestat repetat in scris si verbal impotriva Vatamarii mele corporale, marcand mai presus de orice
dubii intentia criminala a “psihiatrilor” de a ma Vatama corporal la instigarea “organelor judiciare”. S-a
intrunit Comisia de evaluarea legalitatii si temeiniciei internarii mele nevoluntare, care a mintit
incalcandu-mi prezumtia de nevinovatie ca “sunt pericol public” fara nici o justificare legala sau factuala,
fara dovezi, fara obiectivare ci doar cu rea-credinta criminala, un vadit tortionar psihopat pe nume
Mircea Dutescu urland ca sa-mi acopere vocea cand demonstram rational ca sunt nevinovat ca “esti
pericol public”. Asa-zisii psihiatri au refuzat sa incheie documentul obligatoriu de reprezentare
conventioanala cu mama mea, stiind ca va refuza in locul meu sa mi se administreze otravuri, si nu mi s-
a acordat nici reprezentare legala vreodata cand am fost Lipsit de libertate in mod ilegal de catre
Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica a caror membri de rea-credinta deliberat m-au privat de
libertate chiar stiind ca nu mi-am dat consimtamantul pentru interviul psihiatric cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si
art. 11 din Legea 487/2002
Pagina 9 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 186
27.05.2017 cand am fost detinut de la examenele la facultatea de drept, efectiv declarandu-se implicit
ca studentia la drept e psihoza acuta si paranoia deoarece masurile psihiatrice sunt relevante doar la
prezentul imediat cf. art. 122 din Regulamentul de ordine interioara Socola Iasi identic cu toate
regulamentele din tara, act normativ la Legea sanatatii mintale 487/2002 si altele asemenea
II. De drept,
cf. art. 29 (1) din Legea 47/1992
III. In motivare,
constat neconstitutionalitatea art. 315 (2) e) raportat la art. 16 (1) d) respectiv art. 566-572 si
alte articole relevante spetei obligarea la tratament medical din Codul de procedura penala prin faptul
ca mi s-a incalcat in flagrant prezumtia de nevinovatie in toate dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 impotriva mea pentru a savarsi gravele abuzuri din dosarele
10547/231/2015 (-4791/231/2017), 11224/231/2015 (-4909/231/2017), 14277/231/2017 (-
12718/231/2017), in care am avut calitatea de suspect sau inculpat in mod nelegal si netemeinic,
unde 2417/P/2014 a fost inschis prin ordonanta de renuntarea la urmarirea penala din
10.12.2015 prin care asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul de la Parchetul de pe langa Tribunalul Vrancea a
mintit ca am savarsit Ultrajul judiciar in scopul de a falsifica premizele obligarii mele la tratament
medical provizoriu pentru care a introdus o propunere si un raport de expertiza medico-legal, ambele pe
care le-am declarat pe propria raspundere falsificate precum am demonstrat in dsoarul
14277/231/2015 ca sunt inadmisibile si nefondate prin constatarea instantei, dupa ce aceste “organe
judiciare” si alti functionari coautori medici legisti si psihiatri au falsificat documente si au pierdut si un
dosar de internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015 in care au mintit la fel ca am savarsit fapte fictive
fara discernamant
Evidenta nevinovatiei mele este notorie precum am publicat adesea despre aceasta si sesizat
CEDO recent, mai presus de faptul ca este aproape imposibil sa savarsesti Ultrajul judiciar fata de un
judecator fara sa existe probe din motive evidente, ori presupusele probe din dosarul 2417/P/2014 sunt
inscrisuri, cu care timp de 12 luni drept dovada a nevinovatiei mele nu a fost nici macar pusa in miscare
actiunea penala, daramite sa fiu trimis in judecata, deoarece asa- zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a inventat
dosarul 2417/P/2014 in cardasie cu asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela de la Tribunalul Vrancea in scopul de
a savarsi abuzuri impotriva mea in folosul grupului infractional organizat din Focsani din care acestia fac
parte si cu care sunt in vrasmasie, asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul stiind ca n-are nici o sansa sa ma
condamne, punerea in miscare a actiunii penale impotriva mea reprezentand un temei sa-i deschid inca
Pagina 10 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 187
un dosar penal, si inca unul pentru eventualul rechizitoriu falsificat si trimiterea in judecata, eventual
inca un dosar penal pentru falsificarea unei cai de atac.
Pe data de 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016 in dosare in care am demonstrat ca 2417/P/2014,
11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 sunt falsificate precum mentionez si 15730/231/2014, o actiune
falsificata personal de “judecatorul “ Dita Mirela, reclamantul mincinos din 2417/P/2014, am fost
inscenat si s-au falsificat dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, apoi ulterior dosarele
identice cu cele din 2417/P/2014 adica 10547/231/2015 (-4791/231/2017), 11224/231/2015 (-
4909/231/2017), 14277/231/2017 (-12718/231/2017)
Premizele oficiale si legale ale obligarii la tratament medical, sunt cf. art. 107-109 din CP, sa fiu
condamnat mai intai si sa fie dovedit stiintific riscul de a recidiva in acea infractiune conform si
jurisprudentei, dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Sighetu Marmatiei: “...un ordin pentru a urma un tratament
psihiatric nu poate fi impus reclamantului până când nu se va stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar
și că există pericolul de a comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor”.
Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul din 2417/P/2014 a mintit ca am savarsit Ultrajul judiciar, prin
care se subintelege ca am fost condamnat definitiv de o instanta judecatoreasca penala, si a instigat pe
asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu, seful Comisiei de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul
Serviciului de medicina legala Vrancea, care a redactat raportul de expertiza medico-legal psihiatric
falsificat, sa minta ca am istoric judiciar, prin care se subintelege ca am cazier penal. Mentionez ca nu am
fost urmarit pentru o fapta penala fizica care sa constituie o fapta penala, pentru care Ultrajul judiciar sa
constituie circumstanta agravanta, dat fiind ca Ultrajul judiciar nu este o infractiune propriu-zisa si
nimeni nu poate fi urmarit doar pentru Ultrajul judiciar, nici macar urmarirea in rem neputand avea loc
sub acest obiect - mai intai se identifica o infractiune propriu-zisa, apoi se identifica circumstanta
agravanta
Asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian de la Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani a mintit in
ordonanta de clasare din 01.08.2017 din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 ca am savarsit
Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prin tulburarea linistii care este imposibila prin ascultarea la casti de
carti audio precum demonstreaza insusi faptul ca am fost acuzat dupa o ora si jumatate timp in care
am facut acelasi lucru precum am facut in alte sedinte inainte si dupa din aceeasi instanta si alte
instante, iar gesturile si cuvintele de ocara nu exista conform martorilor care nu le precizeaza si
inregistrarilor audio a sedintelor de judecata precum si a declaratiilor mele pe propria raspundere
date fara sa fiu acuzat de Falsul in declaratii macar drept dovada, si prin urmare faptele nu exista nici
d.p.d.v. penal adica acuzatiile sunt mincinoase. Daca fapta nu exista fizic sau penal, nu se poate infera
ca am savarsit o fapta din cauza unor afectiuni mintale deci toate actele medicale sunt si ele vadit
falsificate ca si ordonantele. Deasemenea mentionez ca desi exista cel putin 3 asa-zise certificate
medico-legale psihiatrice pe numele meu sau ar trebui sa existe conform legii si evidentelor, acestea
sunt vadit falsificate deoarece nu pot fi intocmite decat prin interviu cu mine cf. art. 10 din Legea
487/2002 si cu consimtamantul meu cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002 care este
consemnat in ordonantele din dosare ca nu l-am dat vreodata. Aceste certificate psihiatrice falsificate nu
sunt contrazise doar prin lege si lipsa logicii juridice adica a premizelor necesare oricarui tip de inferenta
juridica, ci si prin existenta documentelor de acelasi tip emise de medicina muncii repetat si la recrutare
si incorporare care certifica faptul ca sunt sanatos si apt de munca psihologic
Coroborez la dovada faptului ca nu am fost expertizat medico-legal macar pentru a exista
diagnosticele vadit falsificate ce oricum nu se refera la schizofrenie precum am fost otravit in perioada
27.05.2017-08.06.2017, precum se poate constata din evidenta publica a dosarelor
Pagina 11 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 188
Pagina 12 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 189
medical obligatoriu, respectiv cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, doar condamnatii pentru omor sau pruncucidere,
altfel functionand prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 4 (2) din CPP privind faptul ca orice indoiala a
procurorului in acest caz delir sau halucinatia de a ma acuza de fapte fictive, este obligatoriu
interpretata in favoarea suspectului sau inculpatului, si conform jurisprudentei din dosarul
907/307/2010 coroborata cu principiul dreptului unitar cf. art. 124 din CR si coroborata cu art. 107 din
NCPP, doar daca se justifica stiintific periculozitatea condamnatului de a recidiva, respectiv fiind
imposibila d.p.d.v. legal expertizarea psihiatrica fara consimtamantul liber al condamnatului cf. art. 184
(3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, dar si obligarea la tratament medical deoarece evident
incarcerarea condamnatului rezolva aceeasi problema a prevenirii fenomenului infractionalitatii, si
dreptul la viata si integritatea fizica si psihica este inalienabil in dreptul romanesc
Exceptie face cazul lipsei de discernamant insa doar stabilit legal si temeinic, in realitate
psihiatria fiind o sarlatanie notorie, care trateaza simptomele si nu boala in cel mai bun caz fara nici un
beneficiu pentru cel supus otravirii “psihiatrice”, motiv pentru care asa-zisii procurori Mihaila Paul si
Lupu Mihai Cristian mint obsesiv ca nu am discernamant si sunt violent, fara nici o proba macar
circustantiala, si l-au instigat pe asa-zisul medic-legist Lucasievici Silviu sa minta ca am “(cel mai probabil)
... discernamant mult diminuat”, apoi sa falsifice alte rapoarte psihiatrice ilegal in lipsa mea si
bineinteles fara sa mi le comunice ilegal cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002, in timp ce
“psihiatrul” Lucasievici deasemenea a retinut ca am studii superioare, gandire rapida, cultura generala
s.a.m.d., evident fiind ca asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu nu are nici macar discernamant in
calitate de infractor, incriminandu-se penal prin propriul fals intelectual si incoerenta. Mai mult
coroborez evidenta de notorietate a sanatatii mele mintale prin faptul ca lucrand 4 (patru) ani ca
Programator IT (cf. COR) la SC ROMANIA HYPERMARCHE SA (CORA) si ALTEN SI-TEHNO, am acumulat 4
(patru) certificate de medicina muncii care atesta ca sunt sanatos psihic si apt de munca, precum pot
chema martori, printre care doi psihiatri din Focsani dintre care unul e insasi psihopatul Mircea Dutescu
care in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 urla ca “sunt pericol public”, cu care m-am consultat dupa ce
interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, instigat de grupul infractional local din Focsani, a savarsit in flagrant pe
data de 05.12.2015 tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala impotriva mea, apoi la serviciul
de urgenta a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani am fost injectat in cotul mainii drepte fara acordul meu,
cu o substanta necunoscuta de o persoana necunoscuta care a crezut ca nu voi simti, iar dupa ce am
deschis dosare penale interlopului Herghelegiu Danut si complicilor sai, in scopul abuzarii mele pentru a
renunta la dreptate asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a inceput a falsifica acte de procedura in dosarul
2417/P/2014 care a fost inventat aproape concomitent cu tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea
corporala din 05.12.2015, apoi a falsificat propunerea de internarea mea nevoluntara si ulterior a
falsificat propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical constituind evident tentativa grupului
infractional local de a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate pentru a ma vatama prin injectarea cu
substante toxice, lovire sau in alte moduri. Concomitent cu 2417/P/2014 a fost falsificat si utilizat ca
instrument de santaj dosarul 15730/231/2014 unde reclamantul mincinos din 2417/P/2014 Dita Mirela
m-a calomniat fata de fostul meu angajator in flagrant
Pagina 13 din 14
ANNEX 20. Page 190
si art. 278 Cp.” ci se face o singura data acordul si mai ales se demonstreaza savarsirea infractiunilor, nu
se declara deoarece aceasta nu este niciodata o demonstratie conform logicii juridice, ci un rechizitoriu
este, [3] Cod Penal se prescurteaza “C.P. “nu “Cp.”, [4] e vorba de art. 28 nu 38, s.a.m.d.
01.10.2017
X
Raneti Tudor Andrei
Pagina 14 din 14
ANNEX 21. Page 191
Summary
1 – page 1, 1.1. Proof (notorious) that Invega (paliperidone or risperidone) causes death
amongst a myriad other permanent health issues
2 – page 2, 1.2. Proof (notorious) that Haloperidol which I was injected with, also a fluorine
based neurotoxin as Invega, also called “antipsychotics”, produce irreversible brain damage
3 – page 3, 1.3. Testimonies from all over the world about paliperidone and risperidone
4 – page 6, 1.4. Lawsuits against the companies that commercialized poisons as medicine,
information relevant to paliperidone as well
5 – page 7, 2. Proof that the intent of the so-called judiciary functionaries in Romania intent to
gravely bodily harm me or kill me to silence me
6 - page 7, 2.1. The obsessive criminal intent of this organized crime group
7 – page 7, 2.2. they broke the law using the procedure for killers on me
8 – page 10, 2.3. they unfoundedly declared that I’m lacking discernment totally, that I’m
irresponsible and a public danger from 18.05.2016 to the present
9 – page 11, 2.4. I’ve been already accused of lacking discernment, being irresponsible and
violent and judges in files 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 (first and second instance), where I
annulled the proposals for involuntary internment and medical treatment 3 times as inadmissible and
unfounded
10 – page 12, 2.5. The proof that their intent is to lock me indefinitely at the psychiatry ward
and poison me until they mentally debilitate me to the state they describe of lacking total discernment
and being irresponsible
11 – page 18, 3.1. Reasons for which I have grounded motives beyond any reasonable doubt as
proven above to fear wrongful indefinite imprisonment, psychosomatic torture and permanent
physical and mental degradation and even physical loss of life through forceful poisoning
12 – page 18, 3.2. Postscriptum
13 – page 19, 3.3. A translation of the major penal felonies perpetrated by the members of
this organized criminal group against me and others as I’ve observed personally
1. Proof that torture and permanent infirmity, even loss of live is a reality by forcefully
poisoning me with Invega or other fluorine or chlorine “medical” drug
1.1. Proof (notorious) that Invega (paliperidone or risperidone) causes death amongst a myriad
other permanent health issues. Because they’ve already poisoned me with it illegally, unjustified and
unjustifiably, they will do it again as I prove that is their exact intent
Page 1 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 192
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/04/18/national/21-users-of-schizophrenia-drug-
dead/#.WemQvohx3IU
"The death toll among people who have taken the schizophrenia drug Xeplion has climbed to 21...
Xeplion, which is injected, uses paliperidone palmitate to control symptoms of schizophrenia in adult
patients. The chemical remains in the body for at least four months, it said"
Note the lies in Invega’s prospect for which the “pharmaceutical” companies have been fined
billions although they should be put out of business and the owners locked up for life for crimes against
humanity, at address: https://www.drugs.com/sfx/invega-side-effects.html
“Frequency not reported: ... sudden unexplained death”. There’s nothing “unexplained”, it’s fluorine, a
poison
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paliperidone
"Paliperidone, sold under the trade name Invega among others... In April 2014, it was reported that 21
Japanese people who had received shots of the long-acting injectable paliperidone to date had died"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risperidone
“The active metabolite of risperidone, paliperidone, is also used as an antipsychotic.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_metabolite
“An active metabolite is an active form of a drug after it has been processed by the body.”
I suspect I was poisoned with risperidone actually which is worse than paliperidone which is its
active metabolite as already proven, meaning risperidone is a more "unrefined" poison, which causes, I
quote: "sudden death" from address: https://www.drugs.com/sfx/risperidone-side-effects.html
Note: I remind that I wasn’t even falsely diagnosed with schizophrenia or anything else when I
was poisoned, let alone expertized or marginally proven mentally ill in any way according to the
documents attached which should’ve mentioned this at some point. My poisoning with Invega was
deliberately aimed at bodily harming me or killing me because no death in psychiatric detainment is
ever investigated in Romania which serves the purpose of these criminals of silencing me one way or
another, and discredit me at the same time.
Notoriously fluorine was the choice chemical for repression in nazi camps, which became
“medical treatment” after the same “medics” were recruited through the “Paperclip” allies operation of
importing nazi “scientists”, when US obviously retained the useful rocket scientists and gave the other
allies the quacks, and these torturers who pose as psychiatric medics had to justify themselves writing
books in Canada lying what they did to detainees in camps was medicine to not appear as criminal and
this lie was perpetuated ever since, but it didn’t start with them. Psychiatry is a scam through which
glorified assistants of mental patients raised their social status to obtain profit sacrificing other people’s
lives which by psychiatric definition even is called sociopathy, a “mental illness”. It is proven even in the
first 5 minutes of the scientific documentary “The marketing of madness” that Sigmund Freud himself
took bribe from two pharmaceutical companies to say opium and heroine are psychiatric drugs, causing
a wave of addicted people in Europe at the time
1.2. Proof (notorious) that Haloperidol which I was injected with, also a fluorine based
neurotoxin as Invega, also called “antipsychotics”, produce irreversible brain damage
Page 2 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 193
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-
b&q=antypsychotic+brain+damage+11%25&oq=antypsychotic+brain+damage+11%25&gs_l=psy-
ab.3..33i160k1.18913.20343.0.20575.4.4.0.0.0.0.205.375.0j1j1.2.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..2.2.374....0.PP-
gVAtWgxA&gfe_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=aqXpWe3TFq6s8wfC75ow
then opened
http://www.mindfreedom.org/kb/psychiatric-drugs/antipsychotics/neuroleptic-brain-damage
from which I quote:
“In the past two decades, countless medical studies have shown that use of neuroleptic
psychiatric drugs (also known as antipsychotics) is associated with structural brain changes, especially
when taking high dosages for a long time. These brain changes can include actual shrinkage of the
higher level parts of the brain. The shrinkage can be seen in brain scans and autopsy studies. In response
to industry defenders who claim that this shrinkage is from the "mental illness," studies show
neuroleptics lead to similar brain changes in animals. While the medical side of large libraries has this
information, the public media side of the library does not. In other words, the public, patients and their
families are not being informed about what medicine has long known.”
Then there’s a long list of articles proving this scientifically,
as well as it’s obvious logically since 1. Invega has an effect 2. there’s no scientifically recorded
beneficial effects corroborated with the fact it’s a fluorine based neurotoxin having no biological
function whatsoever, therefore (3) Invega has obvious detrimental health effects
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476840/
“After 17 to 27 months of treatment, both haloperidol- and olanzapine-treated monkeys had an
equivalent and highly significant 8% to 11% decrease in fresh brain weight and volume when compared
with the sham group. These decreases affected all major brain regions but were most robust in frontal
and parietal lobes... these neuropathological changes are strikingly similar to those described in the
schizophrenia postmortem literature”
Furthermore one can search Invega victim’s comments on the internet all describing anhedonia
(loss of pleasure in life obviously including loss of libido), depression and other effects related to the
brain damaging effects of fluorine...
In conclusion in conjuncture with the definition of schizophrenia according to DSM-V is that
these brain poisons produce schizophrenia, not treat it, that is "Schizophrenia is characterized by
delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior, and other symptoms that cause social or
occupational dysfunction."
Proof that Invega causes schizophrenia, not treat it, I quote from its prospect at address:
https://www.drugs.com/sfx/invega-side-effects.html
“Psychiatric ... Common (1% to 10%): ... schizophrenia...”
https://www.drugs.com/comments/paliperidone/invega-for-schizophrenia.html
1.3. Testimonies from all over the world about paloperidone and risperidone:
"Worst medication ever. Ruined my health. It's chemical lobotomy."
“This med made him permanently impotent”
“I was put on this medication. By doctors telling me that I heard voices. When I didn't. I was put
in the hospital. By a police officer who thought I wasn't fit to drive. As I was having a diabetic hypo. He
thought I was on drugs. And locked me in the hospital for 3 weeks. I was forced to have injections of
Page 3 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 194
invega. After this I had stabbing pains in my liver my blood sugar levels jumped I gained 15kgs. I haven't
been able to orgasem. It has been 3 years since I was put on it. And 18 months since I last had it. I am still
over weight. I'm now on diabetes medication. My liver is nearly 3 times the size it should be. And my sex
life is over . All because of this evil medication. It should be banned."
At this point I declare again as I declared before that when I was taken to the emergency
hospital after the interloper hit me on the head instigated by the “judiciary” mafia, I was injected in my
right elbow with an unknown substance by an unknown person without my consent. They said when I
inquired that it was antitetanos however in a very short while I lost my sentimentality and libido.
Because some recovered in the two years after and after I was forced to take Invega I had same
symptoms, I strongly suspect I was injected with paliperidone or risperidone in the night of 05-
06.12.2014 as well, which explains why simultaneously the “judiciary” functionaries from this criminal
group also falsified civil and penal files on me for the sole purpose of abusing psychiatry and the
judiciary system as weapons of wrongful repression, being no doubt now that they hoped that being hit
in the head and poisoned I would be gravely debilitated or develop aberrant behavior in some way,
which they failed because I’m a highly rational person and my personality’s will prevailed over the
permanent damages I suffered, seeing disorder in right eye, endocrine related problems, anhedonia,
Raynaud syndrome (numb or painful stiff arms especially in the morning, also related to the endocrine
problems) etc.
"This medication is an absolute waste of time. I have been on Invega for a little less than 2 years
now and I can with absolute confidence ascertain that it has done nothing for me. Aside from the
decrease in sexual appetite and libido, difficulty having and maintaining erections, little to no
ejaculatory fluid (which is really frustrating btw), the muscle tremors I am experiencing, and the 30
pounds I have gained since starting this medication , it is with no doubt an absolute and total waste of
money. I definitely would not recommend this medication to anyone. Save yourselves the time and
money and DO NOT take this medication."
I also have this which I haven’t pressed in my declarations because it wouldn’t have had helped
my case, because I had no medical attention because of the criminal activity especially in my home
“european” county Vrancea, and because I published what happened to me and this would’ve made me
a subject of contempt not a reason for public outrage as I’ve hoped and never realized anyway because
real civic spirit in Romania is almost repressed
“Total scam. I've been on this drug for 3 years. Since being on it, It caused acute arm paralysis,
dystonia, difficulty speaking, delirium which lasted for a month and it caused weight gain and man
boobs. When I first received the shot, it felt like my brain was about to explode. I had extremely high
blood pressure on this medicine- 178/105. After I stopped it, my blood pressure is 110/78. I experienced
temporal lobe damage from this medicine and a CT scan showed atrophy of my brain after I stopped
taking it. Be careful- many psychiatrists receive grants and stipends from big pharma and receive extra
insurance money to peddle more drugs to as many patients as possible. This is because of our fee-for-
service healthcare system.”
“DO NOT TAKE THIS MEDICINE. I had one shot of invega two years ago. I have quit my jobs,
dropped out of school, and hate myself. I now suffer irregular muscle movements, inability to
Page 4 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 195
resensitize(process new information), hypertension, and slow metabolism. Don't take this medication.
Don't take this medication. Don't take this medication. Do not take this medication. If you don't believe
me then search keep searching invega sustenna reviews. Thousands of negative reviews.”
http://www.askapatient.com/viewrating.asp?drug=21999&name=INVEGA
“Its pure torture Some authority should do something about this drug it has been destroying lifes
for so many years now its impossible jensen doesnt know how bad it is. The responsibles for it must be
arrested. The pain they are causing is inhumane. Im so close of suicide now. I hope that somehow this
gets to the people behind this and you will know what you did to me”
“This shot is to torture people legally by force.do not take it.if you are on ssi and they tell you,you
have to take it and you don't they will take your money from you.”
“This drug is built for the Nazi death camps”
“This drug needs banned.”
“I don't like the way this medicine made me feel I used to be so happy and carefree now I'm
miserable and feel bad about myself.”
“Invega sustenna fried my brain. Im unable to talk to people like I used to. I'm not as outgoing as
I once was. I'm always quiet with nothing in my head. I don't know whether its the meds, or if its the
schizophrenia. I can't speak up for myself. I feel dumb now, and it feels like a permanent disaster. Invega
sustenna ruined me. I used to be smart, but now its like I know nothing. I can't get a girl friend, and its
frightening because it seems as if I'll be this way forever. I'm no longer the loving man that I used to be.
This medicine ruined my personality, charm, and charisma. Its as if I know nothing now, and have
nothing to say. My feelings and emotions are gone, but my feelings can still get hurt. Its torture, and the
doctors don't care. This is a total violation of my civil rights, and I had no choice but to comply. At this
point I don't know what to believe in. I just don't know what to say to people at any given time. My
mental state is tarnished, and its all due to invega sustenna. I know crack heads who are smarter than
me now. Literally...”
“Poison! Pure death!”
“The use of Invega is not humane.”
“Heart problems, caused irregular heart beat, memory problems, hot flashes, greasy face, glassy
eyes, twitching, Parkinson symptoms, muscle atrophy, blood sugar and metabolic imbalance, dizziness,
nightmares, inability to enjoy things or feel pleasure, inability to hardly walk well or to at all jog, no sex
drive, severe anxiety, weight gain, inability to sit still, loss of menstruation, severe difficulty sleeping.”
“Since Invega i cannot work,understand anything,cant enjoy film music,Was attractive now fat
and ugly.Cannot socialize,cannot recall meaning of words,cannot care 4 myself and was not like this
prior Invega.Off invega 11months no change i am going to kill myself if Jenson do not reverse this or
make the rest of my now miserable life comfortable.”
“I was given three injections - starting October 14 to December 14. The side effects were that I
lost all my emotions- both positive and negative. I can't feel pleasure or be motivated, I have no
creativity. It's been 11 months since I stopped taking Invega, but the loss of emotions and feelings is still
here. If someone here has a similar story please contact with me- if you experienced the same loss of
emotions and you recovered, or still haven't.”
“I was suffering from PTSD and was feeling very suicidal. I was on 5 psycotropic drugs when my
psychiatrist decided to give me Invega. Much to my dismay. He did not titrait me off these other drugs
before giving me the Invega. 2 days after receiving a long-lasting(30day) injection of Invega I attempted
Page 5 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 196
suicide. I don't remember anything prior to my attempt. I am now picking up the pieces of my life. I have
been in recovery for the last 6 months. I have suffered multiple broken bones. Legs, arms, feet(heels),
pelvis, back bones along with an acquired brain injury.From all accounts I should be dead. I now have to
use a walker. My feet and legs are very swollen from all the nerve and vein damage that occurred. I
should have not have put on this drug. I blame my psychiatrists poor diagnosis and this drug for what has
happened to me. If I had the money I'd sue the doctor and the drug company. My conclusion is that
Invega is a very dangerous drug.”
“Involuntary muscle movements. Gained 70 lbs. Lethargic and depressed. Cognitive impairment;
so very stupid like I want to take off my pants to go to the bathroom and I take off my shirt instead. New
insatiable appetite for food, cigarettes, sex, caffeine, anything to patch the holes from the chemical
lobotomy. Sleep disorder; can't sleep or sleeping too much. Morally depressed. It's like I have no reason
to live on this, but also nobody else has a reason to live too: Involuntary nihilism. Skin itchiness. My body
can't regulate it's temperature. The slightness exercise makes me feel like dying rather than the joy I
used to get from it.”
“Being on Invega made me into a zombie, I could not stand up off my couch without feeling like
fainting then awfully ill, my mental state was like a destroyed blank slate, I became obsessed with
eating, felt unbearably discomfort able. I was only give 2 injections at the hospital psy unint, it destroyed
my metabolic system my body health ect. It's been a few months since I stopped my mind feels way
better but physically I'm a mess, I do suspect it caused some brain damage”
“Weight gain, extreme memory loss, loss of all emotions ...haven't felt the slightest bit of
happiness or joy in over 3 years, loss of all sexual desire, difficulty with word retrieval, mental confusion,
ADD-like symptoms, extreme increase in social anxiety, loss of desire to maintain any family relationships
or friendships, loss of energy (even though I take 70 mgs of Adderall).”
“Doctor gave it without my consent ... WHO EVER INVENTED THIS NEED TO BE SHOT DEAD.”
And the list of such testimonies grows exceptionally large as I only used one site, but I
remember many more victims comments from what I read months ago...
I can repress my psychological symptoms however they are there along with constant terror
and the panic attacks triggered especially by situations which potentially could result in any scenario
similar to my past half year especially, and past 3 years in general starting from when I was attacked
by the interloper at the instigation of the same organized criminal group of magistrates and
accomplices that falsified all the penal files and psychiatric actions against me
1.4. Lawsuits against the companies that commercialized poisons as medicine, information
relevant to paliperidone as well
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risperidone#Lawsuits
“On 11 April 2012, Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. were
fined $1.2 billion by Judge Timothy Davis Fox of the Sixth Division of the Sixth Judicial Circuit
of the U.S. state of Arkansas.[50] The jury found the companies had downplayed multiple risks
Page 6 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 197
associated with risperidone (Risperdal). The verdict was later reversed by the Arkansas State
Supreme court.[51]
In August 2012, Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay $181 million to 36 U.S. states in order to
settle claims that it had promoted risperidone and paliperidone for off-label uses including for
dementia, anger management, and anxiety.[52]
In November 2013, J&J was fined $2.2 billion for illegally marketing risperone for use in people
with dementia.[53]
J&J has faced numerous civil lawsuits on behalf of children who were prescribed risperidone
who grew breasts (a condition called gynecomastia); as of July 2016 there were about 1,500
cases in Pennsylvania state court in Philadelphia, and there had been a February 2015 verdict
against J&J with $2.5 million awarded to a man from Alabama, a $1.75M verdict against J&J
that November, and in 2016 a $70 million verdict against J&J.[54]
In 2015, Steven Brill posted a 15-part investigative journalism piece on J&J in Huffington Post,
called "America's most admired lawbreaker", which was focused on J&J's marketing of
risperidone.[55][56]“
I remind I’m falsely accused of having no discernment and being totally irresponsible and
violent, which are in other words accuses of dementia and anger issues for which the companies
commercializing risperidone and paliperidone neurotoxins medicine were convicted to pay billions
2. Proof that the intent of the so-called judiciary functionaries in Romania intent to gravely
bodily harm me or kill me to silence me,
2.1. The obsessive criminal intent of this organized crime group is obvious through the
falsification of 4 penal files in which I was never convicted and about which I filed penal complaints, for
naught because the organized crime group level is actually the body of the state functionaries, fact again
proven statistically taken any sample of Romanian public functionaries which are also a factor of
decision in citizen’s lives, and
the 6 psychiatric actions out of which I won against the first 4 annulling them and proving the
“judiciary functionaries” and “forensic medics” are crooks in Romania at least, and
added the proven instigation of the interloper to gravely bodily harm me or kill me, for which
the organized criminal group of magistrates and accomplices falsified all the dossiers mentioned to
silence me one way or another. See 3.2.
2.2. they (this organized crime group using the judiciary system and psychiatry as weapons of
wrongful repression of my dissidence about their criminal activity against me to start with)
Page 7 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 198
broke the law using the procedure for killers on me according to article 184 paragraph 1 from
the Romanian Penal code of procedure which is a derogation from the presumption of innocence that
legally can’t exist meaning is an actual unconstitutional legislative and judiciary abuse, as I translate:
ro.: “...in cazul uciderii sau vatamarii copilului nou-nascut ori a fatului de catre mama, precum si
(nu “sau”) atunci cand organul de urmarire penala sau instanta are o indoiala asupra discernamantului
suspectului ori inculpatului in momentul savarsirii infractiunii ce face obiectul acuzatiei, se dispune
efectuarea unei expertize medico-legale psihiatrice, stabilindu-se totodata termenul de prezentare in
vederea examinarii.”
Translated
en.: “... in the case of homicide or child harming by the mother, and (not “or”) when the penal
pursuit functionary or the courthouse has a doubt about the discernment of the suspect or accused in
the moment of the perpetration of the crime that is the object of the accusation, there will be made an
order for the making of a forensic medical expertise, being established the term on which this will
occur”
This is an (unconstitutional) derogation from the presumption of innocence, because according
to article 4 paragraph 2 from the Romania Penal procedure code, I quote:
ro.: “Dupa administrarea intregului probatoriu, orice indoiala in formarea convingerii organelor
judiciare se interpreteaza in favoarea suspectului sau inculpatului.”
Translated
en.: “After the administration of the entire evidence, any doubt in the formation of the judiciary
functionaries’ conviction is interpreted in favor of the suspect or the accused / defendant”
In the 4 penal files against me in which I remind I was never convicted as proved by the judiciary
proof attached as annex 24, nor was there a marginally objectivized doubt of the prosecutor because
he’s just lying not even trying to cover it up,
as there were never any proofs administered meaning inventoried and objectivized upon
meaning proven logically how they contribute to the case, and correlated with the law and used to
prove my guilt – the judiciary functionaries broke the very fabric of the judiciary act which is the juridical
logic and juridical act syllogism meaning there must exist for every juridical act two premises, the
particular premise of the fact, the universal premise of the law and the logical inference of the
conclusion determined thus according to the principle of legality and truth, the particular premise itself
being subject to a number of validity and verity trials in the form of categorical or syllogistical
propositions which constitute the proper administration of the proofs and state of fact. The same
juridical logic pertains to the obviously falsified “medical” documents that as the penal acts of procedure
skip the particular premise, break the universal premise and just declare nonsensically that I’m
irresponsible, lacking total discernment and violent
I also note the legislator’s nonsense as the derogation from the presumption of innocence which
is legally inadmissible, then the mention of the term accusation in conjunction with the suspect which is
a person for which legally there is no accusation which is relevant because I was suspected in all the 4
Page 8 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 199
penal files and the first penal file was closed with only me as a suspect, the prosecutor lying I committed
the crime which is exclusively the judge’s job, while actually accusing me of an aggravating penal offense
of an inexistent penal offense. In the chronologically last 3 penal files I’ve been suspected and accused
as well not just without any proof, but in disregard of all the proofs, material, witnesses, logic and law
which proven my innocence beyond any reasonable doubt
In the 4 penal cases I’m not even suspected of murder but falsely accused of an aggravating
circumstance called “Judiciary outrage”, for a crime I wasn’t even under penal pursuit so that the
aggravating circumstance would make sense, thus judiciary nonsense, then a crime called “Disturbing
the solemnity of the courthouse meeting”, accusation about which I’ve proven is falsified in every
possible way; material proofs, witnesses, juridical logic, law, unmotivated acts of procedure by the
judiciary functionaries, broken law by the judiciary functionaries etc. Even more nonsensical, there is no
administration of proofs even for the adverse side, as the classification ordnance that I’ve attached as
annex 18
I also mention that according to the whole article 184 from the Romanian Penal procedure code
which also is the basis for the involuntary psychiatric internment, and especially in the conjuncture of
paragraph 3 and articles 10 and 11 from Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding mental health, psychiatric
expertize can only be taken directly, obviously through an interview which also according to the same
article I can refuse making the expertise impossible, also mentioning for the falsified psychiatric
documents I’ve presented I wasn’t ever interviewed, but I’ve taken the identical psychological exams as
I’ve been given by work medicine repeatedly over the years and army incorporation before that, to
which I’ve given the same answers, and in which I haven’t diagnosed with anything thus I can’t be
diagnosed with anything based on these because of this proof, meaning that the so called medical
documents made at the instigation of the crooked judiciary functionaries, are again proved falsified
Translated
en.: “Assessment of mental health is carried out by direct examination of the person concerned
only by the psychiatrist”
“The assessment of mental health is done with the free, informed and documented consent of
the person, except for the specific situations established by the law, when the assessed person has
difficulty in assessing the implications of a decision on himself, in which case the assessed person must
be assisted by the representative legal or conventional.”
Article 184 (3) from Romanian Penal procedure code sais the same thing as article 11 form
Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding mental health
Page 9 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 200
I was never assisted by a representative legal or conventional even by reduction to the absurd
scenario that they aren’t lying and I’m lacking discernment and being irresponsible and not actually
being able to write all this and prove my innocence and superior discernment. The “psychiatrists”
deliberately refused an explicit request to fulfill such a form for my mother, the conventional
representative
In conclusion the organized crime group comprised of “judiciary functionaries” and “forensic
medics” intently broke the law and falsified the facts drawing unfounded and unsustainable conclusions
for the sole purpose of silencing me by gravely bodily harming me or killing me. In support I can attach a
21 GB archive of files that I have with me on a stick, proving further why they want to silence me, that is
because I can prove every single magistrate in Romania is corrupt, and about 86% of them are gravely
criminal, while this situation is not only tolerated by the secret services but it correlates with the existing
proof the secret services are behind this situation, recruiting and blackmailing magistrate into a
collaborative body for making illicit profit. This is nothing new in Romanian history or world national
politics in general, however this particular state of fact occurred in 1989 coup d’état against the socialist
Romanian government, when these “secret services” with the aid of foreign support took power and
never let go of it since, the courts of law in Romania actually executing sentences in a military fashion at
the order of these secret services high-ups, which explains the thorough collaboration in crime between
different “professionals”, as well as their callousness towards committing obvious and grave crimes,
instigated by their support from this system of repression
2.3. they unfoundedly declared that I’m lacking discernment totally, that I’m irresponsible and a
public danger from 18.05.2016 when they lied I committed the crime of Disturbing the solemnity of the
meeting, until the present and for an indefinite time for which they said “until not a public danger”, as if
stupidity or any measure of lack of discernment can be treated medically (else all people would take pills
for that), not to mention that even in an absurd scenario if this was possible and I was actually lacking all
discernment, it can’t be obviously treated by neurotoxins or debilitating brain poisoning
This is proven by
2.3.1. the court order that I be obligated to “medical” treatment indefinitely meaning until these
criminals decide I’m not a public enemy, meaning a danger to them. I’ve attached this as annex 19
2.3.2. the prosecutor’s ordnance who closed the penal pursuit claiming I was irresponsible,
lacking total discernment and proposing that I be obligated to “medical” treatment indefinitely. I’ve
attached this as annex 18
In short, the prosecutor declares I belong to the articles 107-109 of the Romanian Penal Code
who describes security measures against ro.: “faptuitor” meaning mot-a-mot deed-doer, that is penal
felony perpetrator, which a suspect or accused aren’t according to the presumption of innocence as
stated by the Romanian Penal procedure code articles 4 and 99, and article 23 paragraph 11 from
Romanian Constitution, that nobody is to be considered guilty until proven guilty by a condemnation
sentence in a court of law, given all procedural guarantees, that is also according to article 6 of
European declaration human rights which is internal law in Romania according to articles 11 and 20
from the Romanian Constitution, by an impartial tribunal giving all guaranteed procedural rights to the
defendant which I haven’t been given through repeated refusal of these “judiciary” functionaries to
communicate to me the content of the penal dossiers, be it their ordnances and other acts of procedure
as the falsified “medical” documents, or the proofs, some testimonies of which I’ve seen personally and
even if they are obviously false witnesses instigated against me, they accuse me of ridiculous things as
Page 10 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 201
“being arrogant when called by a judge through a gendarme in another courthouse room” – that is I had
a trial as a claimant in another courthouse room, I was called by the judge through a gendarme and I
walked there... later I heard through relations that they’ve made deals with convicts from the
penitentiary to make false testimony against me, but those aren’t used either in the ordnance I’ve
attached as proof, as they would be clearly false testimonies because I got the material proof of the
courthouse audio recording to stand against them
I repeat as proof, I was never convicted, according to annex 24 of the ECHR urgent request for
interim measures, pages 1-110 item (actual page 95), I don’t even appear as being in penal pursuit as
accused, and if convicted this must appear publicly in ECRIS (Romanian evidence of courthouse dossiers
and sentences), which can be accessed at address http://portal.just.ro/SitePages/dosare.aspx which
appears in google by searching with keyword: ro.: “dosare”, at which my name can be searched by
typing “raneti tudor” in “Nume parte” textbox meaning in en.: “Name of party”, which will produce a list
of my courthouse actions in which I’m a party, in reverse chronological order meaning last action
appears first. My condemnation should follow the date of pages 112-117 item, that is the prosecutor’s
ordnance from 01.08.2017 communicated to me late on 01.09.2017 for closing the penal pursuit which
is not the act of ro.:”rechizitoriu” or en.: “indictment” which is the only procedure act that can lead to a
condemnation in which my guilt can be proven. Since I haven’t been convicted, nor proven guilty, nor
are there any damages or marginal suspicions of an immoral act in this line of thought, there can’t be
any inferences that is juridical documents as the “medical” falsified documents claiming I’m a public
enemy, or judiciary documents claiming that I must be obligated to “medical” treatment because I’m a
public enemy, not just because I haven’t been proven as such, but also because it can’t be proven given
(1) there is no proof, (2) proofs show beyond any reasonable doubt my innocence which is why (3)
proving my guilt is impossible which explains both (1) and why the “judiciary functionaries” couldn’t
even attempt at building a demonstration of my guilt
In conclusion I’ve got obviously superior discernment, unquestionable sense of responsibility, as
I’ve proven my innocence although not required to and thus proven the “judiciary functionaries”’ guilt
and criminal intent, according to the juridical logic principle of non-contradiction and excluded third – in
layman’s terms either I’m telling the truth or they are, and I’m the only side proving it beyond any
reasonable doubt, another fact by which I corroborate the verity of my declarations
2.4. I’ve been already accused of lacking discernment, being irresponsible and violent and judges
in files 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 as indicated in the ECHR request for urgent measures, and
I’ve won annulling these accusations proving the “judiciary functionaries” and “medics” falsified the
documents with which they proposed that I be involuntarily detained at the psychiatry ward and
obligated to “medical” treatment that is brain poisoned or chemically lobotomized with chlorine and
fluorine as there isn’t such thing as psychiatric treatment. See annex 3, 5 and 10
Being acquitted of these ridiculous accusations given the total lack of evidence and obvious
infringement of the law by the accusing side, and according to principle ne bis idem – nobody can be
trialed twice, not even on fictive accusations, because I was only accused of fictive facts I can’t be
accused again of lacking discernment, being irresponsible and violent, thus the 5th (4909/231/2017) and
6th (12718/231/2017) psychiatric actions against me which are identical to the 2nd (11224/231/2015), 3rd
(14277/231/2015 first instance) and 4th (14277/231/2015 second instance), broke a fundamental
Page 11 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 202
principle of the law and were inadmissible to start with, that is before the law was pervasively broken
and the state of fact obviously falsified by unfounded accusations that is breaking the syllogistical
structure of the juridical act
2.5. The proof that their intent is to lock me indefinitely at the psychiatry ward and poison me
until they mentally debilitate me to the state they describe of lacking total discernment and being
irresponsible is the lawful appearance they’re pursuing, that is after they started the psychiatric
procedure for killers who doesn’t pertain to me as proven above, they’ve skipped any measure of
provisory “medical” treatment as was the case in 14277/231/2015 proposal which I annulled as falsified
by the “authorities”, and went straight to indefinite “medical” treatment, for which I’ll translate the
articles proving this is the case that endangers my physical and psychological integrity, according to
articles 566-574 from the Romanian Penal procedure code
Translated:
“The security measure of obligation to medical treatment taken through a definitive decision is
executed by the communication of the copy of the decision and copy of the expertise report of the
forensic medical authority for public health from the county in which territory resides the person about
which this security measure was taken. The public health authority will communicate immediately the
person about which the obligation for medical treatment was issued, the sanitary unit in which the
person will undergo treatment”
“The execution judges will communicate to the person about which the measure of obligation to
undergo medical treatment, that the person is obligated to present itself immediately at the sanitary
unit where the treatment will be administered, being informed that in the case of not respecting the
obligation the medical internment will be disposed (involuntary medical internment)”
The order that I be obligated to undergo “medical” treatment was issued through the falsified
sentence attached as annex 19. The forensic medicine institution never communicated me any of their
falsified documents except annex 16, although they are obligated by the law, as article 58 from the
Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding mental health provides:
Page 12 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 203
ro.: “Medicul psihiatru, dupa evaluarea starii de sanatate mintala a persoanei aduse si dupa
aprecierea oportunitatii internarii nevoluntare, are obligatia de a informa imediat persoana respectiva si
reprezentantul legal al acesteia cu privire la hotararea de a o supune unui tratament psihiatric, precum si
cu privire la propunerea de a o supune internarii nevoluntare”
Translated:
en.: “The psychiatrist, after the evaluation of the mental sanity of a brought person, and after
the appreciation of the opportunity of involuntary interment, has the obligation to inform immediately
the respective person and his legal representation regarding the decision to subject that person to a
psychiatric treatment, as long as regarding the proposal to subject that person to involuntary
internment”
Furthermore, I mention I was never given legal representation at the so called psychiatric
examinations according to article 184 (3) from Romanian Penal procedure code, examination which
never actually even took place even if they arrested me for it 3 times and 1 time they claimed it
happened when I wasn’t even there by will or force, that is at least once they claim the examination to
have had taken place when I wasn’t even physically there
As well, the fact the Ethics committee was never convened during my poisoning in the 27th May
2017 – 8th June 2017 detainment, according to article 43 from Romanian Law 287/2002 regarding
mental sanity, nor was I allowed to express consent for poisoning me, purpose for which the so called
medics also broken the law regarding the obligation for them to close a contract with my conventional
representative that is my only relative, as required for the law to express consent instead of me given
that they declared me without discernment and irresponsible in hidden documents, then they
contradicted themselves the documents I got and attached as annex 16, in which they don’t retain that
I’m irresponsible and lacking discernment
Translated
en. “Clinical studies and experimental treatments, psychosurgery and other treatments
susceptive to provoke harm to the integrity of the patient, with irreversible consequences, won’t be
applied to a person with psychological disorders except by that person’s consent, after being informed
and took knowledge of the danger, with the condition of approval by the ethics committee from the
psychiatric ward, which must be declared convinced that the patient has given his consent, after taking
knowledge of the whole case, and this corresponds to the patient’s interest”
Page 13 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 204
In fact, I was poisoned starting 27th May 2017 without my consent, without any committee
approval, without diagnostic, without being informed of regulations and law as required by the law to
know my rights, by breaking every relevant law, by vice of consent through violence by being tied up by
force, unjustly and illegally as well as injected with poisons named Haloperidol and Diazepam and
deprived 3 days from sleep by being placed in a saloon with 7-8 other real patients who were screaming,
being obligated to sign a document dictated to me by a so called curator psychiatrist to which a day
after some of the effect of the injected poisons wore off I asked about and in writing under my signature
I proven that it was all illegal, thus noting my vitiated consent meaning I was unable to defend myself
from being poisoned even worse through injections instead of oral administration of Invega which I
understood it was even more harmful even if I didn’t understand at the time what it was, I knew from
my research years back in the psychiatric actions I’ve won there is no such thing as psychiatric medical
treatment, only poisoning
Also I remind that a “mental patient’s consent” is ludicrous because a person who hasn’t a
healthy discernment can’t make choices for himself, and furthermore according to the Romanian
Constitution in accord with human rights declarations, the right to physical and psychological integrity of
a person is guaranteed, not to mention psychiatrists can’t be medics because of Hipocrate’s oath that at
least medicine do no harm, which is a legal requirement for acceding the medical profession, which just
proves psychiatry is an instrument of wrongful repression used by totalitarian governments or
“authorities” around the world who use this discretionary against dissidents against their criminal
activity
I mention I saved a press communique of the general prosecutor of Romania from a secret
service report given around the same time but after I denounced publicly that “justice” in Vrancea
county is drugging innocent people, that describes the fact psychiatrists make illegal experiments on the
patients for the pharmaceutical mafia, that is for illicit profit. This penal file was never heard of since,
and is a national matter of security as a large number of people are reportedly and notoriously provably
been poisoned for illicit reasons (not that there are licit reasons but the law has been broken anyway,
unconstitutional or not). I can present this proof published:
1. (censored and republished) https://www.scribd.com/document/344526386/justitia-din-
Vrancea-drogheaza-oameni-nevinovati
2. (removed as a press release as I expected, which is why I kept a copy and republished)
https://www.scribd.com/document/331592730/comunicat-de-presa-SRI-PICCJ-din-31-05-2016-privind-
faptul-ca-psihiatrii-fac-din-pacienti-cobai
To continue with the point proven at hand, the fact I wasn’t even punctually communicated the
obligation according to the law with all the mentions is irrelevant, because these “judiciary
functionaries” obviously break every relevant law as proven, as they did before even refusing to
subpoena me before falsifying a mandate for masked police and gendarmes breaking into my home
every time arresting me, claiming I refused to present myself when subpoenaed when I wasn’t
subpoenaed to start with.
As they did before in spring of 2017, falsifying mandates of detainment and the whole
procedure for locking me up and poisoning me at the psychiatry ward during 27th of May 2017 and 8th of
June 2017, is my grounds on which I predicted they would falsify the decision of my obligation to
undergo “medical” treatment for an indefinite amount of time, which is why I had to go in permanent
Page 14 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 205
hiding after on 1st of September 2017 I received the prosecutor’s ordnance, annex 18, and could deduce
they will falsify the sentence I attached as annex 19,
I also present the law as proof of intent of this criminal organized group who uses the judiciary
system and psychiatry as weapons of wrongful repression, that is I quote from article 567 from the
Romanian Penal procedure code:
ro.: “Unitatea sanitara la care faptuitorul a fost repartizat pentru efectuarea tratamentului
medical este obligata sa comunice instantei...”
Translated
en.: “The sanitary unit at which the penal felon / penal deed-doer was distributed for undergoing
medical treatment is obligated to communicate to the judges...”
This proving that this can’t apply to me because I wasn’t convicted through an indictment and
sentence, and I don’t even have the status of accused after the penal file was closed. About this I also
filed a request to the Romanian Constitutional Court that the unconstitutional law be repealed as were
articles regarding the renunciation of penal pursuit by the prosecutor without a public trial in which the
persons accused be convicted or acquitted – see Romanian Constitutional Court Decision 90/23.02.2016
followed by OUG 18/2016 that reinstated the law with the condition that is verified by the judge, the
law being reintroduced unconstitutional again because it’s conflicting not only with the Constitution but
other laws that state the accused can only be acquitted or convicted, this being the purpose of penal
matter - other administrative matters or politics can’t possibly interfere with the judiciary field according
to the principle of separations of power in a democratic state of right
Legal state of fact which is leading to article 568 from the Romanian Penal procedure code, as I
quote:
ro. ”Primind comunicarea, instanta de executare sau instanta prevazuta la art. 567 alin. (2)
dispune internarea medicala, in situatiile prevazute la art. 567 alin. (1) lit. a) si b), iar in situatiile
prevazute la art. 567 alin. (1) lit. c) si d) efectuarea unei expertize medico-legale cu privire la starea de
sanatate a persoanei fata de care este luata masura de siguranta.”
Translated
Page 15 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 206
(in these articles the subject is obligatory medical treatment, meaning the legislator is beating
around the bush when he’s not contradicting himself – the law being wrote by prosecutors which is why
in Romania we call this wrongfully “the prosecutor republic”, in actuality the so-called secret services
being in charge and these “judiciary functionaries” and “medics” being the torturers of the regime, as
this pervasive state of affairs denoted by the fact the entire hierarchy is accomplice, is clearly a matter
of national security also, that is I’m not the only one but the only one in this particular situation with the
knowledge to voice this grave concern)”
This is correlated with articles 109 and 110 from Romanian Penal Code from which I quote:
ro.: “Când persoana faţă de care s-a luat această măsură nu urmează tratamentul, se poate
dispune internarea medicală”
“Când făptuitorul este bolnav psihic, consumator cronic de substanţe psihoactive sau suferă
de o boală infecto-contagioasă şi prezintă pericol pentru societate, se poate lua măsura internării
într-o unitate sanitară de specialitate, până la însănătoşire sau până la obţinerea unei ameliorări
care să înlăture starea de pericol.”
Translated:
en.: “When the person to whom this measure is taken does not receive the treatment,
medical hospitalization may be ordered”
“When the perpetrator is mentally ill, a chronic consumer of psychoactive substances or
who suffers from an infectious-contagious disease and poses a threat to society, the measure of
admission to a specialized health care unit may be taken until the recovery or until improvement is
obtained to remove the state of danger”
In fact according to Penal procedure code there is no “may” but it’s obligatory, see quoted
article 568 above, and note again the fact the law speaks of the perpetrator, not of me the accused /
defendant who benefits from the presumption of innocence because I wasn’t proven guilty by
indictment and condemnation
And finally I prove that there is no legal ending in this procedure, meaning they can keep doing
this forever, first of all because they break the law at will and nobody is punishing them by removing
them from public function at least, and secondly because the law itself is aberrant, as article 569 (3)
from the Romanian Penal procedure code which I quote below proves
Translated:
en. “After receiving the communication, the judge delegated with the execution from the
courthouse in which circumscription the sanitary unit is found, verifies periodically, but not later than 12
Page 16 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 207
months (that is the period for verification is 12 months and the internment period can go from years to
life), if the medical internment is still necessary”
Obviously locking a person up and poisoning it won’t make that person responsible or give it
discernment, as this never happened and can’t happen as proof. I remind however that I’m innocent as
I’ve proven, responsible and with superior discernment as I’ve proven writing my plea by also holding a
job and being declared psychologically apt by work medicine as well being incorporated in the army
before that, reason for which this measure is illegal, unfounded and clearly exaggerated denoting
criminal intent as even the crime I’m falsely accused of has a maximum penalty of 3 months in prison
This opens legally the possibility of indefinite to life detainment as proven, because I
obviously refuse to be poisoned, going into permanent hiding as soon as I caught word of this
ro.: “In cazul in care persoana fata de care s-a luat masura internarii medicale refuza sa se
supuna internarii, executarea acestei masuri se va face cu sprijinul organelor de politie. In vederea
executarii masurii internarii medicale, organul de politie poate patrunde in domiciliul sau resedinta unei
persoane fara invoirea acesteia, precum si in sediul unei persoane juridice fara invoirea reprezentantului
legal al acesteia.
(3) Daca persoana fata de care s-a luat masura internarii medicale nu este gasita, autoritatea de
sanatate publica sesizeaza organele de politie pentru darea in urmarire, precum si pentru darea in
consemn la punctele de trecere a frontierei. Un exemplar al sesizarii adresate organelor de politie se
trimite instantei de executare.”
Translated
en.: “In the case that the person about which has been taken the measure of medical
internment refuses to subject itself to the internment, the execution of this measure will be done with
the support of the police. Regarding the execution of the medical interment, the police can enter the
domicile or residence of a person (note: any person!) without their consent, as well in the headquarters
of a juridical persona without the consent of its legal representative”
“If the person about which has been taken the measure of medical internment is not found, the
public health authority will notify the police for putting under pursuit, nationally as well as at the
frontier. A sample of the notification of the police is sent to the executing judges”
In conclusion, the Romanian apparatus of wrongful repression can issue within 24h or even less,
the order that I be detained and forcefully imprisoned in a psychiatric ward as a result of the sentence
attached as annex 19. After they falsified the sentence that I be obligated to “medical” treatment, they
are even required by the law to do so else they would contradict themselves. The psychiatric type
actions according by the law must be secret – they only kept it public to discredit me by breaking the law
in this case too, but there’s no guarantee any such file will not be passed in secret if it has a purpose, as
the fact they’ve hidden the content of the penal files and refused to communicate the “medical” files to
me proves, which I can prove on demand by the fact I even sued them and they broke the law lying
obviously I haven’t the law given right to defend myself having access to the documents of the
accusation
Page 17 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 208
3.1. Reasons for which I have grounded motives beyond any reasonable doubt as proven above
to fear wrongful indefinite imprisonment, psychosomatic torture and permanent physical and mental
degradation and even physical loss of life through forceful poisoning, not that the imprisonment and
permanent mental degradation through poisoning and isolation is better but actually worse than death,
speaking from experience
3.2. Postscriptum. At this point I consider that all 6 psychiatric actions made against me were
attempts to silence me, and I annulled the first 4 because the “judges” didn’t want to get their hands
dirty personally with this job, claim backed up by the fact on 27.10.2014 and 05.12.2014 an interloper
was instigated by this organized criminal group to gravely bodily harm me or kill me making it look as
an accident, as they assured him they would protect him from penal consequences of the law and as
they did as proof later refusing to administer the proofs and prosecute him, also stealing the civil files I
made against the interloper to close them illegally, while the same members of this organized crime
group started inventing civil and penal dossiers against me as 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015,
14277/231/2015, 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017 psychiatric action prove, which can be seen
summarized in the public evidence of dossiers at address http://portal.just.ro/SitePages/dosare.aspx
In this matter I have paper proofs that I can provide on demand that show beyond any doubt
that it was a concerted effort in which were actively involved
the Romanian gendarmes as directed by their general, a certain guy who actually rose in ranks
from the same administrative area meaning he’s a member of the same organized crime group,
the forensic medics who refused to send me to the proper medical specialties regarding head
trauma, then after I’ve been to the medics and obtained 2 reports from brain surgeons, 2 from
neurologist, 2 MRI scans and other proofs, refused to release another expertise using these and after I
appealed to a lawyer to address them, they updated the old falsified expertise covering up for the
interloper, lying that all the reports I have are falsified. Against these I also opened a penal dossier which
was closed illegally by the same prosecutor who falsified the first penal file against me and first 3
psychiatric actions, clearly attempting to silence me to cover up the grave bodily harming and
attempted murder, and all the accomplices,
same judges and prosecutors who are behind all this situation, and the secret services which
was toughest to prove, but I could simply by the fact I’ve denounced and proved the criminal activity in
my whole home county administrative area up to the capital leaders of the judiciary system and more,
about which the secret services should’ve made a report to the general prosecutor because at this level
it’s a matter of national security, report which of course they didn’t do and they even lied to me in a
response that all this is about 1 judge
As a last thought and as proof I never planned to travel for tourism or work abroad, I didn’t until
now, that is I’m obviously in Lebanon for a major force reason, also pointing out I’m not and can’t be in
Lebanon for a material reason such as making money which I’m not and can’t be, and not for the living
conditions here which are poor - if I was looking for making money I would’ve stayed in UK which has 1st
world living condition and remuneration, and I can’t afford to travel for tourism, meaning I’m obviously
here for the reason I say I am as proven, political asylum, and Lebanon as my friend put it has a long
tradition of being a place for refugees and freedom fighters. I’m just asking for legal protection to live
what’s left of my life hopefully decent
Page 18 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 209
3.3. A translation of the major penal felonies perpetrated by the members of this organized
criminal group against me and others as I’ve observed personally
ro.:”
Articolul 282 Tortura – Codul penal roman
(1) Fapta funcţionarului public care îndeplineşte o funcţie ce implică exerciţiul autorităţii de stat sau a
altei persoane care acţionează la instigarea sau cu consimţământul expres ori tacit al acestuia de a
provoca unei persoane puternice suferinţe fizice ori psihice:
a) în scopul obţinerii de la această persoană sau de la o terţă persoană informaţii sau declaraţii;
b) în scopul pedepsirii ei pentru un act pe care aceasta sau o terţă persoană l-a comis ori este bănuită că
l-a comis;
c) în scopul de a o intimida sau de a face presiuni asupra ei ori de a intimida sau a face presiuni asupra
unei terţe persoane;
d) pe un motiv bazat pe orice formă de discriminare, se pedepseşte cu închisoarea de la 2 la 7 ani şi
interzicerea exercitării unor drepturi.
(2) Dacă fapta prevăzută în alin. (1) a avut ca urmare o vătămare corporală, pedeapsa este închisoarea
de la 3 la 10 ani şi interzicerea exercitării unor drepturi.
(3) Tortura ce a avut ca urmare moartea victimei se pedepseşte cu închisoarea de la 15 la 25 de ani şi
interzicerea exercitării unor drepturi.
(4) Tentativa la infracţiunea prevăzută în alin. (1) se pedepseşte.
(5) Nicio împrejurare excepţională, oricare ar fi ea, fie că este vorba de stare de război sau de ameninţări
cu războiul, de instabilitate politică internă sau de orice altă stare de excepţie, nu poate fi invocată
pentru a justifica tortura. De asemenea, nu poate fi invocat ordinul superiorului ori al unei autorităţi
publice.
(6) Nu constituie tortură durerea sau suferinţele ce rezultă exclusiv din sancţiuni legale şi care sunt
inerente acestor sancţiuni sau sunt ocazionate de ele.
“
Translated:
en.:”
Article 282 Torture – Romanian Penal Code
(1) The act of a civil servant who performs a function involving the exercise of the state authority or
other person acting upon his or her express or tacit consent to cause a strong physical or mental
suffering:
a) for the purpose of obtaining from this person or a third party information or statements;
b) For the purpose of punishing her for an act committed by her or a third person or suspected of having
committed it;
c) for the purpose of intimidating or pressuring them or to intimidate or put pressure on a third person;
d) on a ground based on any form of discrimination, shall be punished by imprisonment from 2 to 7
years and the prohibition of the exercise of certain rights.
(2) If the deed provided in paragraph (1) resulted in bodily injury, the penalty is imprisonment of 3 to 10
years and the prohibition of the exercise of certain rights.
Page 19 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 210
(3) Torture resulting in the death of the victim shall be punished by imprisonment from 15 to 25 years
and the prohibition of the exercise of certain rights.
(4) The attempt to commit the offense provided for in paragraph (1) is punishable.
(5) No exceptional circumstance, whatever it is, whether it is a state of war or a threat of war, internal
political instability or any other state of exception can not be invoked to justify torture. Also, the order
of the superior or of a public authority can not be invoked.
(6) do not constitute torture pain or suffering arising only from lawful sanctions that are inherent in such
sanctions or caused by them.
“
I was tortured physically through bodily injury and psychically by being imprisoned and poisoned
in the period of 27th of May 2017 and 8th of June 2017, as well as tortured by permanent brain damage
from being hit on the head on 05.12.2014 that resulted in sight and endocrine disorders, and then from
stopping me from denouncing this grave crime the organized crime group instated a regime of terror
against me for 3 years 2014 – 2017, falsifying 4 penal and 6 psychiatric actions and breaking into my
house periodically both illegally and unfoundedly.
Because in my case the sanctions are not legal, paragraph 6 is not applicable not that
constitutionally or according to the human rights can be, which in Romania are supposed to be internal
rights according to articles 11 and 20 of the Romanian Constitution
ro.:”
Articolul 439 Infractiuni contra umanitatii – Codul penal roman
(1) Săvârşirea, în cadrul unui atac generalizat sau sistematic, lansat împotriva unei populaţii civile, a
uneia dintre următoarele fapte:
a) uciderea unor persoane;
b) supunerea unei populaţii sau părţi a acesteia, în scopul de a o distruge în tot sau în parte, la condiţii
de viaţă menite să determine distrugerea fizică, totală sau parţială, a acesteia;
c) sclavia sau traficul de fiinţe umane, în special de femei sau copii;
d) deportarea sau transferarea forţată, cu încălcarea regulilor generale de drept internaţional, a unor
persoane aflate în mod legal pe un anumit teritoriu, prin expulzarea acestora spre un alt stat sau spre un
alt teritoriu ori prin folosirea altor măsuri de constrângere;
e) torturarea unei persoane aflate sub paza făptuitorului sau asupra căreia acesta exercită controlul în
orice alt mod, cauzându-i vătămări fizice sau psihice, ori suferinţe fizice sau psihice grave, ce depăşesc
consecinţele sancţiunilor admise de către dreptul internaţional;
f) violul sau agresiunea sexuală, constrângerea la prostituţie, sterilizarea forţată sau detenţia ilegală a
unei femei rămase gravidă în mod forţat, în scopul modificării compoziţiei etnice a unei populaţii;
g) vătămarea integrităţii fizice sau psihice a unor persoane;
h) provocarea dispariţiei forţate a unei persoane, în scopul de a o sustrage de sub protecţia legii pentru
o perioadă îndelungată, prin răpire, arestare sau deţinere, la ordinul unui stat sau al unei organizaţii
politice ori cu autorizarea, sprijinul sau asentimentul acestora, urmate de refuzul de a admite că această
persoană este privată de libertate sau de a furniza informaţii reale privind soarta care îi este rezervată
ori locul unde se află, de îndată ce aceste informaţii au fost solicitate;
i) întemniţarea sau altă formă de privare gravă de libertate, cu încălcarea regulilor generale de drept
internaţional;
Page 20 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 211
j) persecutarea unui grup sau a unei colectivităţi determinate, prin privare de drepturile fundamentale
ale omului sau prin restrângerea gravă a exercitării acestor drepturi, pe motive de ordin politic, rasial,
naţional, etnic, cultural, religios, sexual ori în funcţie de alte criterii recunoscute ca inadmisibile în
dreptul internaţional;
k) alte asemenea fapte inumane ce cauzează suferinţe mari sau vătămări ale integrităţii fizice sau
psihice, se pedepseşte cu detenţiune pe viaţă sau cu închisoare de la 15 la 25 de ani şi interzicerea
exercitării unor drepturi.
(2) Cu aceeaşi pedeapsă se sancţionează faptele prevăzute în alin. (1), săvârşite în cadrul unui regim
instituţionalizat de oprimare sistematică şi de dominare a unui grup rasial asupra altuia, cu intenţia de a
menţine acest regim.
en.:”
Article 439 Offenses against humanity - Roman Penal Code
(1) The commission, in a generalized or systematic attack against a civilian population, of one of the
following acts:
a) killing some people;
b) subjecting a population or part of it to the purpose of destroying it wholly or in part of living
conditions intended to cause its physical or total physical destruction;
c) slavery or trafficking in human beings, especially women or children;
d) forced deportation or transfer, in violation of the general rules of international law, to persons
lawfully in a given territory by expelling them to another State or to another territory or by using other
coercive measures;
e) torture of a person under the care of the perpetrator or over which he exercises control in any other
way, causing him physical or mental harm or serious physical or psychological suffering that exceeds the
consequences of the sanctions allowed by international law;
f) rape or sexual assault, coercion to prostitution, forced sterilization, or the illegal detention of a
woman who has become pregnant for the purpose of altering the ethnic composition of a population;
g) harming the physical or mental integrity of some persons;
h) causing the forced disappearance of a person in order to escape from the protection of the law for a
long period, by kidnapping, arresting or holding, at the order of a state or a political organization, or
with their authorization, support or assent, followed by the refusal to admit that this person is deprived
of his liberty or to provide real information about his fate or the place where he is, as soon as such
information has been requested;
i) imprisonment or other form of grave deprivation of liberty, in violation of general rules of
international law;
j) persecution of a particular group or community by deprivation of fundamental human rights or by
severely restricting the exercise of these rights on grounds of political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural,
religious, sexual or other criteria recognized as inadmissible in international law;
(k) other such inhuman or degrading acts of great suffering or harm to physical or mental integrity shall
be punishable by life imprisonment or by imprisonment from 15 to 25 years and the prohibition of the
exercise of rights.
(2) The same punishment shall be sanctioned by the facts provided for in para. (1) committed under an
institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination of a racial group on another, with the
intention of maintaining this regime.
Page 21 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 212
I was tortured physically through bodily injury and psychically by being imprisoned and poisoned
in the period of 27th of May 2017 and 8th of June 2017, as well as tortured by permanent brain damage
from being hit on the head on 05.12.2014, that resulted in sight and endocrine disorders, and then from
stopping me from denouncing this grave crime the organized crime group instated a regime of terror
against me falsifying 4 penal and 6 psychiatric actions and breaking into my house periodically both
illegally and unfoundedly.
ro.:”
Articolul 194 Vatamarea corporala – Codul penal roman
(1) Fapta prevăzută în art. 193, care a cauzat vreuna dintre următoarele consecinţe:
a) o infirmitate;
b) leziuni traumatice sau afectarea sănătăţii unei persoane, care au necesitat, pentru vindecare, mai
mult de 90 de zile de îngrijiri medicale;
c) un prejudiciu estetic grav şi permanent;
d) avortul;
e) punerea în primejdie a vieţii persoanei,se pedepseşte cu închisoarea de la 2 la 7 ani.
(2) Când fapta a fost săvârşită în scopul producerii uneia dintre consecinţele prevăzute în alin. (1) lit. a),
lit. b) şi lit. c), pedeapsa este închisoarea de la 3 la 10 ani.
(3) Tentativa la infracţiunea prevăzută în alin. (2) se pedepseşte.
“
Translated:
en.:”
Article 194 Bodily injury - Romanian Criminal Code
(1) The act provided in art. 193, which caused any of the following consequences:
a) an infirmity;
b) traumatic injuries or damage to a person's health, requiring more than 90 days of medical care for
healing;
c) serious and permanent aesthetic damage;
d) abortion;
e) jeopardizing the life of a person shall be punished by imprisonment from 2 to 7 years.
(2) When the deed was committed in order to produce one of the consequences stipulated in par. (1) lit.
a), lit. b) and lit. c), the punishment is imprisonment from 3 to 10 years.
(3) The attempted offense referred to in paragraph (2) is punishable.
“
Both my poisoning during the period of 27th of May 2017 and 8th of June 2017 and being hit on
the head on 05.12.2014 have provoked permanent injuries meaning sight, endocrine disorders and
Raynaud sindrome meaning hand stiffness in the morning and random hand numbness, depression,
anhedonia, learning and speech disability in the form of intellectual capacity and performance reduction
as documented in annex when after I’ve been poisoned I performed at IQ 98, and after a month I can
produce documents I partially regained my IQ on superficial passing of tests yielding 113, 119 then on a
maximum concentrated effort, above 140
Page 22 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 213
I mention there is no accesible cure for brain damage (dead neurons) – there exists some
experimental stem cell cure, and no cure at all for mind damage (destroyed synapses and psychological
trauma can’t be reversed)
ro.:”
Articolul 189 Omorul calificat – Codul penal roman
(1) Omorul săvârşit în vreuna dintre următoarele împrejurări:
a) cu premeditare;
b) din interes material;
c) pentru a se sustrage ori pentru a sustrage pe altul de la tragerea la răspundere penală sau de la
executarea unei pedepse;
d) pentru a înlesni sau a ascunde săvârşirea altei infracţiuni;
e) de către o persoană care a mai comis anterior o infracţiune de omor sau o tentativă la infracţiunea de
omor;
f) asupra a două sau mai multor persoane;
g) asupra unei femei gravide;
h) prin cruzimi,se pedepseşte cu detenţiune pe viaţă sau închisoare de la 15 la 25 de ani şi interzicerea
exercitării unor drepturi.
(2) Tentativa se pedepseşte.
“
Translated:
“
Article 189 Qualified murder - Roman criminal code
(1) Murder committed under any of the following circumstances:
a) with premeditation;
b) for material interest;
c) to evade or to evade another from taking criminal responsibility or from executing a punishment;
d) to facilitate or hide the commission of another crime;
e) by a person who has previously committed a crime of murder or attempted murder;
f) over two or more persons;
g) a pregnant woman;
h) by cruelty, it is punished by life imprisonment or imprisonment from 15 to 25 years and the
prohibition of the exercise of certain rights.
(2) The attempt is punished.
“
Both my poisoning during the period of 27th of May 2017 and 8th of June 2017 and being hit on
the head on 05.12.2014 could’ve resulted in my death, on 05.12.2014 also being thrown unconsciously
from the top of a flight of stairs, and regained consciousness after I was stuck with my foot in the iron
bars near almost to the bottom
I also mention without quoting the plethora of other penal felonies committed by this organized
crime group against me, starting with the very felony of Constituting an organized crime group, felonies
of corruption, felonies of public service, felonies against a person liberty, felonies for obstructing justice,
felonies of falsifying documents and many others
Page 23 of 24
ANNEX 21. Page 214
22.10.2017
Page 24 of 24
Date generale http://www.studenti.ueb.ro/ums/do/secure/vizualizare_date_generale_student
1 of 2 04-Nov-17, 9:44 AM
Istoric şcolar http://www.studenti.ueb.ro/ums/do/secure/vizualizare_traiectorie_scolara
1 of 2 04-Nov-17, 9:47 AM
Situaţie financiară http://www.studenti.ueb.ro/ums/do/secure/vizualizare_info_financiar
1 of 2 04-Nov-17, 9:49 AM
ANNEX 23. Page 218
EXPLANATORY NOTES
regarding
(I) page 1 - a short categorical demonstration of the illegality of all psychiatrically profiled
dossiers falsified against me, constituting the crimes described in the main request
(II) page 5 - description of the urgency
(III) page 9 - damage claims
(IV) page 17 - background of the enmity that I believe motivated these crimes
(V) page 18 - two proposals for urgent interim measures that could solve this criminal
activity in Romania
(VI) page 19 - other explanations that didn’t fit the main description
Page 1 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 219
unfounded, there’s a complementary doubt that the suspect or accused is mentally sane, thus the
doubt is to be interpreted that the suspect or accused is mentally sane
4. In conclusion the psychiatric procedures don’t apply to me thus all the consequent
psychiatrically profiled acts of procedure are illegal, not to mention they’re suppose to subpoena
me before they detain me for the false reason that I’ve refused to present myself when
summoned, reason that can only be valid if I received a subpoena and didn’t present myself. In
reality the magistrate mafia is falsifying mandates of detainment for harassment and for impeding
my ability to defend myself by bringing me to the courthouse in the last possible moment to not
be allowed to read the dossier against me and build a defense
4.1. According to article 184 paragraph 3 from Romanian Penal code of procedure only
the suspect or accused who has given his written consent in the presence of a lawyer in front of
the prosecutor can be psychiatrically examined, and
4.2. According to article 11 from Law 487/2002 regarding mental health only after the
person to be examined has been informed and documented about the law relevant to his
situation, and given his consent freely, in the presence of his legal or conventional
representative.
4.3. In conclusion because I haven’t given my written consent, nor was ever a
representative of any kind present while I was detained for nothing in front of the so called
Committee of forensic psychiatrists on 17th September 2015 and 6th April 2017, no papers can be
legally made that I be psychiatrically examined, so psychiatric procedures don’t apply to me
meaning all the consequent documents are illegal as they were falsified in my absence because
according to article 10 from Law 487/2002, the psychiatric examination can only be done directly
with the psychiatrist meaning through an interview which never happened because it’s impossible
without my consent, and even if I would’ve been coerced by violence that would constitute
vitiation of consent, a reason of annulment of all subsequent documents
5. according to article 184 paragraph 4 from Romanian Penal code of procedure, only if
the suspect or accused gave his consent and then refuses to present himself to the psychiatric
examination when summoned, he can be brought by force to the Committee of forensic
psychiatrists, because otherwise obviously the examination can’t take place without the suspect’s
or accused’s consent. One can physically refuse too after consenting and changing mind, again
making the examination impossible, reason for which this article is obviously an unconstitutional
aberration – as “medicine” or quackery as this “psychiatry” is because it can’t be forced on
anyone with or without his consent by medical oath of Hippocrates and medical deontology
which of course also means it can’t be used as punishment as the so called psychiatric treatment
through poisoning is proven to be chemical lobotomisation, being unscientific at the same time
because it’s based on statistics not facts, made on the observations of proven sociopaths meaning
the psychiatrists, where sociopaths means persons who pervasively break the law and other
people’s rights sacrificing their lives for the purpose of justifying their own, not to mention
sociopaths are mythomaniacs meaning obsessive liars. The fact psychiatry is not scientifically
based is even proven by the name of the diagnostics manual itself – “Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders”. The psychiatric poisons are not curing the metaphorical “mental
illness” but are changing symptoms for other worse symptoms from physical damage done
Page 2 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 220
6. Last but not least, suspects and accused are innocent until proven guilty according to
articles 4 and 99 from Romanian Penal procedure code, article 23 paragraph 11 from Romanian
Constitution, and of course article 6.2 from ECHR, which means no deed penal or not can be
associated with me until I’m proven guilty, not just indicted and convicted which I wasn’t, not
even using falsified decisions, therefore no inference can be made that I’m mentally insane
because I haven’t done anything illicit or even immoral, meaning all medical documents against
me are obviously factually falsified as well
7. the particular premise I abstracted to not bring hundreds of pages of proofs, refers to:
7.1. the authority of already made judgment on the matter - ne bis idem between
11224/231/2015 and 4909/231/2017, as well as 14277/231/2015 and 12718/231/2017, because
I’m repeatedly accused of fictive facts that don’t constitute penal offences even fictively, meaning
the judgment was made using fictional penal accusations in both dossiers 2417/P/2014 and the
connected last three 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 which implies ne bis idem,
which is all the more obvious as I’ve been accused repeatedly of same thing, lacking discernment,
being irresponsible and violent or a public danger, accuses which were declared by the
courthouse illegal and unfounded in 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015, judgement which
pertains to identical dossiers 4909/231/2017 and 12717/231/2017 to be declared illegal and
unfounded as well, which I also proven above anyway as well as at length in 78 pages in annex 20
regarding my plea in 12718/231/2017 adapted from the plea against all the other psychiatrically
profiled dossiers. This alone (ne bis idem) is ground of annulment of judgments in 4909/231/2017
and 12717/231/2017
7.2. I haven’t been notified of the content of 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017 and
been deliberately restricted the right to defend myself
7.2.1. by the 7 gendarmes who arrested me and delivered me at the last possible moment
in court in 4909/231/2017 on 10th April 2017, refusing to communicate to me the mandate for my
detainment, and who even stole two pencils so I don’t write my own report on the spot and build
a defense while illegally detained, and by the judge who refused to subpoena me according to
article 184 paragraph 8 from the Romania Penal procedure code previously of falsifying the
detainment mandate for the purpose of impeding me reading the dossier 4909/231/2017 and
consequently building my defense before he falsified the sentence, while the same judge verbally
stated in court that he’s restricting my right to plea, all of this in breach of my guaranteed right to
defend myself. My state lawyer was corrupt and did not plea as all before him, claiming
aberrantly against my interest that ne bis idem expires in time. Notice that annex 12 mentions
nothing about the gendarmes, because it’s falsified in many respects, like the lie there existed an
expertize which the annulment of 11224/231/2015 proven it didn’t exist because it couldn’t have
possibly taken place physically, and other lies
7.2.2. by the imminent threat of indefinite imprisonment to life for the purpose of
torturing me by gravely bodily harming or murdering me by poisoning me with neurotoxin Invega,
for which a preventive mandate of arrest could’ve been issued not that the magistrate mafia is
worried about legality when ordering someone’s detainment as I proven and as is notorious in
Romania, reason for which I had to go into hiding and not appear in court or even attempt to read
the dossier in the courthouse archive for fear of loss of freedom leading to torture and loss of life.
Page 3 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 221
As I predicted that the decision in dossier 12718/231/2017 would’ve been falsified as it was, I
corroborate with the fact last time I was in court personally meaning 18th May 2016 and 24th June
2016, I was framed with the falsified dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 being
thus blackmailed to not appear personally in court also under threat of being framed
7.2.3. In conclusion this alone is ground of annulment of judgment 4909/231/2017 and
12718/231/2017 because it constitutes a flagrant breach of article 6 paragraph 3 letter b from
the Convention - right to reasonable time to prepare a defense - I was given no time at all, nor the
chance because the judge refused to obey the law and administer my proofs amongst which the
law itself. I was able to send the plea in annex 20 to 12718/231/2017 because 12718/231/2017 is
identical to 14277/231/2015 as 4909/231/2017 was identical to 11224/231/2015 thus I was able
to file a pertinent written plea. If my right to my defense wasn’t substantially infringed because of
the fact I was able to plea, in compensation the magistrate mafia demonstrated plenty its criminal
will in disregarding the law and facts while also obviously attempting in all manners to restrict my
right to defense because last but not least the 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017 dossiers
surely contain particularities which I could’ve also addressed in my defense, as the fact that I
found out through my mother who I mandated to look in 12718/231/2017, that there were no
medical documents attached at all meaning the proposal that I be obligated to medical treatment
is absolutely unfounded, all the more I proven anyway any medical documents made in my
absence can only be falsified not only because they’re illegal, but because they’re evidently
contradictory to the reality portrayed by my proofs that I’m not just responsible having a job
proven by the obvious fact I would have no means to sustain my life as I don’t come from a rich
nor numerous family, and I’m also employed with superior studies proving I have superior
discernment meaning according to psychiatric literature on this notion I’m able to formulate plans
and fulfill them at a level required by superior studies, and as proven by my plea I have superior
juridical discernment although I’m licensed in mathematics-informatics and specialized in
informatics now law, and obviously I’ve interiorized the law as my social command, as proven by
annex 17 representing my clean judicial history that I’m a perfectly adjusted citizen to the civil
society of the state of right, which was perfectly facilitated by the fact I’m an orthodox Christian
believing in God, as Christianity is behind today’s notion of the secular state of right as it was set
out in the Bill of rights originally by the forefathers of USA then spread throughout the world
7.3. “Judge” from 4909/231/2017 also falsified the rejection judgment of my request for
his revocation / dismissal meaning his removal from the 4909/231/2017 dossier based on his
incompatibility demonstrated by his obvious partiality because he falsified mandates for my
detainment in 4791/231/2017, then he infringed on my right to make my defense falsifying again
a mandate for my detainment in 4909/231/2017 without issuing a subpoena as legally required.
This “judge” broke article 67 paragraph 5 from Romanian Penal code of procedure claiming that
the request factually based on his falsification of detainment mandate from 5th April 2017 from
4791/231/2017 was already judged, but as fact I haven’t made such a request between 6th April
2017 when I was illegally detained with it and found out it exists, and 10th April 2017 when I
formulated the request so such a request couldn’t have been possibly judged before I made it,
thus the “judge” in 4909/231/2017 broke the principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa potest,
judging his own request for removal for incompatibility reasons, not to mention I accused him in
Page 4 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 222
the same penal file in which I’m accused as legally possible, that makes him incompatible
according to article 11 form OUG 27/2002 - ~”no functionary can address anything regarding
anything regarding himself”. This alone is ground of annulment of judgment in 4909/231/2017
7.4. other penal offences of falsehoods in official papers that I’m sure “judge” in
4909/231/2017 did because sociopaths always lie - it’s their characteristic called mythomania, the
obsession to lie
8. All these law infringements constitute a flagrant breach of article 6 from the
Convention - right to a fair (lawful) trial - all relevant laws were broken on purpose, be it
procedure or material right, implicitly a flagrant breach of article 5 and 7 from the Convention,
and by the means and purposes of the wrongful repression and associated criminal acts against
me it constitutes a flagrant breach of articles 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 17 from the Convention
1. since 11th October 2017 when the final solution of the Romanian magistrate mafia was
taken in dossier 12718/231/2017, I can be illegally and unjustified imprisoned indefinitely to life,
for the purpose of being tortured by being permanently bodily damaged or murdered with the
fluorine based neurotoxin Invega (even without diagnosis and medical justification as annex 16
proves) which causes a myriad of health problems and death as an immense number of internet
public testimonies prove, or as the "judge" said, until I no longer "represent a public danger" (by
being innocent as annex 17 proves) meaning until I can no longer denounce the mafia’s crimes in
public. To discredit me although I'm employed with superior studies they already declared me
since 2014 irresponsible, without discernment, and a public danger (never indicted and convicted
of anything as annex 17 proves). See annex 19
2. so called police and gendarmes will keep breaking illegally into my mother's home to
harass her as they threatened if I’m there, and will keep arresting me illegally, instigated by
3. so called magistrates in “European province” Vrancea county that will keep attempting
to illegally commit me psychiatrically and gravely harm me as they did between 27th May 2017
and 8th June 2017 by poisoning me with fluorine and chlorine, and
3.1. as they tried through 11224/231/2015 which I annulled as unfounded at courthouse
“Tribunalul Vrancea” in 11224/231/2015, where the 1st instance falsified decision is identical to
the one in 4909/231/2017 because it’s illegal and based on fictional accusations that can’t be
otherwise, then 4909/231/2017 should’ve also been annulled as unfounded,
3.2. as they tried through 14277/231/2015 which I annulled as inadmissible and
unfounded at courthouse “Judecatoria Focsani” then courthouse “Tribunalul Vrancea” where the
1st instance and 2nd instance decisions are contradictory to the identical dossier 12718/231/2017
because it’s illegal and based on fictional accusations that can’t be otherwise, then
12718/231/2017
should’ve also been annulled as inadmissible and unfounded
Page 5 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 223
Page 6 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 224
psychiatric actions, psychiatric acts, illegal arrests, deprivation of freedom illegally, torture and
murder attempts attest, as proven through this urgent request for interim measures
8. The imminent threat that constitutes the urgency is proven by the falsification of
decisions in 4909/231/2017 on 10th April 2017 and 18th May 2017 that led to my illegal
deprivation of freedom and torture between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, followed by the
falsification of decision in 12718/231/2017 on 11th October 2017 that leads to illegal indefinite to
life loss of freedom, torture, risk to life, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment, ill-
treatment or other serious harm, risk of social exclusion, risk of a flagrant denial of justice,
risk to private and family life, health and conditions of detention, right to a fair trial and legal
representation,
8.1. situation that could’ve been prevented if Romanian agent “D.Lupu” posing as the
registrar didn’t break ECHR Rule 47 5.1 destroying my urgent request lying I must fill this form not
lodge the request in writing and Rule 39 doesn’t regard Articles 2, 3 and 8 from ECHR, and as
proof of his criminal intent then he broke ECHR destroying this request rules two more times to
prevent it reaching the judges
9. The threat on my life is actually 3 years old because this same criminal group of
“magistrates” instigated an interloper to kill me, who on 05.12.2014 hit me on the head and
threw me over a flight of stairs unconsciously proven by witnesses, material proof of an audio-
video recording of the interloper reported to the interloper caught lying in judicial declarations to
cover up the attempted murder and make it look like an accident. The interloper was protected
by same “magistrate” group who falsified all the resolutions in all the penal and civil files by
falsifying the acts of procedure and even stealing proofs from the files. I mention relevantly that
this is when the persecution using falsified penal files and psychiatric actions started, obviously
meant to discredit and silence me after I proven the “magistrates” instigated the interloper to kill
me assuring him they will protect him from prosecution, also proven by the fact same
“magistrates” falsified dossiers 15730/231/2014, 2417/P/2014, 10547/231/2015,
11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016, 4329/P/2016, 4791/231/2017,
4909/231/2017, 12718/231/2017 and others - where the nnnn/231/yyyy files are publicly
accessible on courthouse’s sites of “Judecatoria Focsani” and “Tribunalul Vrancea” courthouses,
googling for link like so “site:.ro judecatoria focsani” without the quotes, then searching the file
number with “cautare dosare” option. The nnnn/P/yyyy are penal files at the prosecutor’s office
in Vrancea county, first one at “Parchetul de pe langa Tribunalul Vrancea” the rest at “Parchetul
de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani” - and this being sais I mention they also refused to give me my
right to consult these files so I don’t gather more proofs against them. I’ve sued them for this also
but of course they control all the judges so I can’t possibly obtain any my rights in a Romanian
courthouse
10. These grave crimes against me started by the instigations and personal involvement of
“judge” Dita Mirela from “Tribunalul Vrancea” courthouse, wife of ex-president of the courthouse
meaning it’s at least a family of collaborators with so called Romanian secret services, a mafia in
actuality. Dita Mirela
Page 7 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 225
10.1. personally stole the civil files of the interloper to falsify the decisions of rejection
after instigated him to commit attempted Qualified murder against me on 27th October 2014 and
5th December 2017, and who Bodily harmed me giving me permanent infirmities consisting of
sight and endocrine disorders from being hit on the head,
10.2. personally and simultaneously in December 2014 filed a falsified penal complaint
against me which was registered as 2417/P/2014 which she lost, and
10.3. personally and simultaneously in December 2014 falsified psychiatric file
15730/231/2014 which she lost, being proven beyond any reasonable doubt after she personally
instigated 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 psychiatric actions from 2417/P/2014 that were
rejected and proven falsified, that she in cahoots with her organized criminal group is also the
instigator behind falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 and
falsified psychiatric actions 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017,
11. being note-worthy that the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 was kept secret while
they were secretly setting up psychiatric action 15730/231/2014, attempting to put me under
interdiction after I survived their assassination attempt which is more complicated than I let on,
involving the gendarmes up to their general who refused to notify as legally required the
prosecutor’s office and lied in the minute they drafted refusing to note the proofs.
12. Only after they lost in 15730/231/2014 not managing to coax more accomplices into
helping them right away, they started harassing me in 2417/P/2014, and the grave crimes from
17th September 2015, 11224/231/2015 and the rest happened immediately after I filed a penal
complaint proving I know about their illicit operation.
13. The crimes of this magistrate mafia whose members are obviously collaborationists in
the secret services that are actually ordering the judges in a military fashion, are after the same
pattern of notorious Ceausescu’s instigation for the assassination of Virgil Tanase, Paul Goma and
Monica Lovinescu which were just dissidents, not demanding Ceausescu be convicted how I
demanded through my penal complaint that “judge” Dita Mirela face the rigors of the law. The
modus operandi is also in the same manner “communists” notoriously killed engineer Gheorghe
Ursu: (1) falsify penal files against the undesirable, (2) detain the undesirable making him
vulnerable, (3) instigate an inmate or mental patient to gravely harm or kill the undesirable or
poison the undesirable to gravely harm or kill him– mentioning at this point the press made public
that no death in psychiatric detainment in Romania is ever investigated. This is not an actual
communist method but older, as Romanian national poet Mihai Eminescu was falsely accused of
mental alienation and poisoned with mercury which when it didn’t succeed in silencing him fast
enough, they arranged that a “mental patient” hit him in the head with a brick which caused his
death
14. The falsification of 4909/231/2017 and especially 12718/231/2017 for the purpose of
imprisoning me indefinitely to life, torture me by gravely harming bodily harming me or
murdering me by poisoning me with Invega, means this organized criminal group is supremely
confident in the security of their totalitarian regime as all these years they’ve committed crimes
against me without answering before the law, thus they will keep attempting to seriously harm
me or kill me to silence me if their system of wrongful repression by use of the judiciary system
and psychiatry as weapons is not stopped
Page 8 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 226
III. Damages.
Page 9 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 227
examination without my consent, not “treatment” which is also illegal for the fact there was no
diagnosis on 27th May 2017 as annex 16 proves, nor was I ever diagnosed with schizophrenia to be
poisoned with Invega “legally” because it a serious diagnosis impossible to fake about someone
like me, which proves the mafia is aware that Invega is a seriously harmful and deadly poison and
forced me to take it illegally and unjustified by threat of violence, attempting to fake my consent
which was obviously vitiated, to get away with gravely Bodily harming me and attempted
Qualified Murder, which constitutes the felonies of Torture, Crimes against Humanity, Deprivation
of liberty illegally, Subjection to bad treatment and others.
2.1. Having to leave the cities since my illegal arrests on 6th and 10th April 2017 followed
by attempted arrests on 13th and 14th April 2017 and being followed by the Bureau of criminal
investigation until my illegal arrest on 27th May 2017 for the false accusation of the big crime of
Disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse meeting by the impossible fact of disturbing the
quietness by listening to audiobooks on earphones,
2.2. my time meant for study, for making essays as requested by the faculty to take the
exams, as well as the time and possibility of acquisition of means of existence was taken from me,
being forced to live from mercy from monasteries, relatives and friends,
2.3. basically the magistrate mafia trying with every abuse of public function they can
perpetrate to destroy my life as they've nothing better to do since 2012 when they last left me
with no job by refusing to judge and making it clear they sold my work litigation for bribe, and
before this they broke my possibility to acquire a house through a special housing loan program
and consequently impeded me to found a family since 2009 when an interloper family with
connections in the secret services refused to give me a legal subvention with which to pay the
advance on the loan for a small apartment because I refused to bribe them, and ever since they
have been trying to stop me obtaining justice about this and consequent felonies they did against
me.
2.4. The magistrate mafia falsified the proposal that I be indefinitely imprisoned to life,
tortured or murdered by Invega poisoning exactly on 1st September 2017 meaning exactly the
start of the session when I was going to recover my lost exams from 27th May 2017 when they
illegally arrested me, causing me to go into hiding until the fall of this murderous regime if ever,
and losing the chance to finish my law faculty for which I already paid - 511 euro pecuniary
damages as tax for the first year. I filed a request that my faculty is frozen but this request is only
admissible for two years in a row, while I don’t predict this murderous totalitarian regime will fall
in such short term. See annex 22
2.5. In conclusion the magistrate mafia actively blocked my ability to earn my existence
legally proving its criminal activity against me is not random but concerted as it was since 27th
October 2014 and especially 5th December 2014 when they the instigated interloper committed
the felonies of attempted Qualified murder against me and Bodily damage,
2.6. reasons with which I corroborate to the soundness of my claim for the sum of 3000
euro / month pecuniary damages I demand as repair for the problems this magistrate mafia
caused since November 2012 until the present. Because I’ve been deprived of my time and energy
resulting in loss of quality of life I claim the exact amount as non-pecuniary damages for
satisfaction in return of suffering from loss of my right to choose my education and profession,
Page 10 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 228
and the vicissitudes created by deprivation of the means to provide for my existence, meaning
3000 euro non-pecuniary damages
3. I claim 250,000 lei (~55,555 euro - fifty-five thousand euro and five hundred fifty-five,
that is 250,000 lei / 4.5 lei for one euro) non-pecuniary damage for each distinct crime against me
and the suffering I’m enduring, as objectivized by public falsified dossiers which are
simultaneously public slander because the magistrate mafia illegally that is against data
protection law insist of showing off their falsified psychiatric actions in public against me for
discrediting me particularly me as I’ve proven they hidden the rest after I denounced them
publicly for drugging innocent people as I’ve found out from ECRIS public evidence,
3.1. based on notorious Romanian case of chief anticorruption “prosecutor” Kovesi vs
Antena 3 television in which Kovesi was awarded 250,000 lei for image and dignity damages, and
according to article 16 and 124 from Romanian Constitution which is in accordance with European
law - all Romanian citizens have equal rights before law and justice, and nobody's above the law.
3.2. I base my non-pecuniary claims on the fact
3.2.1. I am suffering sight and endocrine disorders from the Bodily harm and attempted
Qualified murder perpetrated by the interloper instigated by this magistrate mafia on 27th
October 2014 and 5th December 2017, which manifests in bad eye sight, hand numbness and
stiffening in the morning. This is penal dossier 246/P/2015
3.2.2. I am suffering psychosomatically from repeated deprivation of liberty, rest, and
stressed through irrational unlawful behavior of the so-called Romanian authorities related to
falsified dossiers against me 2417/P/2014, 10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015,
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016, 4329/P/2016, 4791/231/2017, 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017
which caused me grief and anxiety, resulting in sleep and gastric disorders as all people
experience in problems associated with stress, and living in constant terror diminished my quality
of living and my intellectual capacity.
3.2.3. After being poisoned between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 I suffer from
depression, anhedonia, gave me memory problems, learning disability, the inability to create and
other cognitive dysfunctions, physical seminal liquid dysfunction as well as lack of libido, dry eyes
with crusts, sore throat, dry mouth and left me traumatized psychologically fearing for my health
and life while reliving the fear I experienced at the psychiatry ward especially after the first three
days spent in the urgency room locked up with other ~8 mental patients out of which 2 were
constantly screaming making rest impossible, while I was shivering and had and overall bad
reaction from the Haloperidol and Diazepam injections, followed by panic attacks triggered by
situations in which my Torture could possibly reoccur, or simply from reminiscing or from the
uncertainty I’ve been put under by deprivation of my rights
3.2.4. The falsification of the decision in 12718/231/2017 for imprisoning me indefinitely
to life and torturing me with Invega poisoning for silencing me about their crimes, also caused me
to be separated me from my family and social life while I’ve gone into permanent hiding and in a
situation of total uncertainty in my future because of this illegal chaos and criminal activity of the
magistrate mafia, for which I live in terror and anxiety.
Page 11 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 229
3.2.5. In conclusion so far, because these proceedings are public in ECRIS Romanian
public files evidence, both my public personal and professional image as well as my dignity have
been gravely damaged being associated with arrests and psychiatric files, far more than Kovesi
claimed in her case about being slandered by the press thus this sum is in actuality a minimum,
the non-pecuniary damages for the suffering I’m enduring having to be greater than mere image
and dignity damages
4. In continuation I separate and describe my ordeal and objectivize my claims according
to overlapping time periods in which the effects for which I claim non-pecuniary damages persist
4.1. from November 2012 to the present the magistrate mafia refused to judge my work
litigation after obviously being bribed, reason for which I can’t annul the illegal disciplinary lay off
which slanders me professionally as well being an affront to my dignity or personal image. This
case in itself is too large to discuss here, reason for which I leave it for another ECHR case unless
ECHR requires and demands it which I hope it does
4.2. from 5th December 2014 when the interloper hit me on the head and threw me
unconsciously on a flight of stairs leaving me with permanent health issues manifested by sight
and endocrine disorders from which I’m suffering until the present especially because I’ve lost
physically the pleasure of life, also being reminded every microsecond of the trauma by the sight
disorder, and every morning by the stiffening of my hands. I’ve been deprived of justice in this
cause 246/P/2016 simultaneously with the grave crimes I describe next who were meant to
silence me about the fact the interloper was instigated by the magistrate mafia as I proved in
many ways, injustice which causes me grief and anxiety. This is 246/P/2015 penal dossier,
4.3.1. in conjuncture with 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) penal dossier against 2 forensic
medics who refused to send me to the proper medical specialties regarding head trauma, then
after obtaining diagnostics refused to inscribe them in the forensic certificate forcing me to get a
lawyer to address them, after which the falsified the certificate again lying 2 diagnostics from
neurologists, 2 from neurosurgeons and 2 MRI scans were all falsified, along with the backup
medical specialty literature I’ve used to read on my condition, and
4.3.2.in conjuncture with a number of complaints about the prosecutor’s falsified acts of
procedure in 246/P/2015 and extraordinary attacks against the falsified decisions for covering up
the attempted Qualified murder and Bodily harm
4.4. from March to April 2015 I experienced grief and anxiety because of the falsified
psychiatric file 15730/231/2014 regarding my placement under interdiction, until I won and
annulled it proving it was falsified. In this as a hint as the ones who bribed the judges in my work
litigation, the lawyers of my ex-employer appeared in this file making an accessory application
which they also lost having no proof to put me under interdiction with
4.5. from 17th September 2015 until 28th October 2015 when I remember I won and
annulled the involuntary psychiatric commitment in 11224/231/2015, I’ve experienced grief,
anxiety, frustration, sleep disorders and digestive disorders, starting with the fact on 17th
September 2015 I was arrested by masked police who broke into my home at 6:00 a.m. as an
terrorist act proven by the fact “prosecutor” who instigated this appeared at 9:00 a.m. as I
remember and effectuated no acts of procedure as legally required but instead harassed me with
irrational behavior for 6 hours before sending me illegally by force with masked police to the local
Page 12 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 230
psychiatric forensic service. This “prosecutor” wasted my life in the period 17th September 2015
until 28th October 2015 obligating me to document myself and build my own defense because I
couldn't find a single lawyer versed or willing to help me in Vrancea county, and had no financial
resources to hire another from the capital, not that those are actually much brighter. They in fact
corrupted the state lawyer who pleaded with the same rhetoric of the “prosecutor”, against
which I had to file a penal complaint also to remove him from the dossier
4.6. from 11th November 2015 until 5th February 2016 when I remember I won and
annulled the obligatory psychiatric treatment proposal in 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance,
proposal because of which I suffered grief, anxiety, frustration, sleep disorders and digestive
disorders, associated with the morning illegal arrest on 17th September 2015 when I was arrested
by masked police who broke into my home at 6:00 a.m. as an terrorist act, and the morning illegal
arrest on 11th November 2015 and my illegal detainment for 3 hours. I mention they thus wasted
my life in the period 11th November 2015 until 5th February 2016 obligating me to document
myself and build my own defense because I couldn't find a single lawyer versed or willing to help
me in Vrancea county, and had no financial resources to hire another from the capital. They in
fact corrupted the state lawyer who pleaded that "I leave the defense to the judge", against which
I filed a penal complaint also to remove him from the dossier. I also mention the most relevant
fact, that the so-called prosecutors closed penal file 2417/P/2014 on 10th November 2015, one
day after introducing 14277/231/2015, for which reason I had no passive quality in
14277/231/2015 to be judged with and the “judge” should've acted upon and annulled the action
immediately, but instead harassed me two continuous months by aberrant judicial activity such as
depriving me of liberty illegally for 3 hours on 11th November 2015 using a falsified mandate,
rejecting illegally my requests and invoking even an abrogated law to reject my notification of the
Romanian Constitutional Court, as can be seen in ECRIS in the summary of dossier
14277/231/2015
4.7. 5th February 2016 to 7th July 2017 a different prosecutor from a different prosecutor's
office without active quality filed a falsified appeal in 14277/231/2015 which he lost on 7th July
2016, time in which 3 or 4 judges changed this dossier between them with no apparent legal
forms.
4.8. On 7th July 2016 the “judge” also rejected my legal 14277/231/2017 appeal in which I
demanded amongst others the courthouse recognizes that the forensic report in it is illegal and
factually falsified, that it may be annulled. This “Judge” is the one who falsified penal dossiers
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 on 24th June 2016 through which I was ultimately Tortured
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 based on falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 that
didn’t even mattered to the torturer psychiatrists that it was about examination not poisoning
me, and then I was forced into permanent hiding in fear of loss of freedom, torture and loss of life
afterwards because of the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017. This “judge” falsified the penal
dossiers against me lying that I committed a felony by proving as the basis of the request that he
must be removed from the dossier 14277/231/2015 for incompatibility reasons specifically
proven partiality, prove by the fact this “judge” illegally sent my complaints meant for the
courthouse according to article 340 from Romanian Penal procedure code, to the prosecutor's
office to impede them being judged, and falsified other sentences directly linked to
Page 13 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 231
14277/231/2015 which made this “judge” directly incompatible for addressing the same cause as
stated by article 64 from Romanian Penal procedure code. This “judge” made no real factual
accusations but accused me with the law's text generically typical to liars, and later falsified 4
addresses in which he rejected my requests for the communication of the material proof of the
audio file from 24.June.2016 from 14277/231/2015 that proves I'm innocent but most of all
proves a colossal number of felonies done by this “judge” who harassed me verbally on 24th June
2017 provoking me even by falsifying 2 judicial tickets - and I mention that in the 3rd penal file
2845/P/2016 that was falsified against me on 18th May 2016 by the same “prosecutor” who filed
the falsified appeal in 14277/231/2015 without active quality, I requested and obtained the audio
file from 18th May 2016 through which I prove that my request was admissible and the “judge” is
hiding the proof which is proof in itself, that she silently recognizes his felonies.
4.9. This caused me the same stress and loss in quality of life I invoked before which I’m
going to stop repeating at every occurrence for I consider this implied
4.10. on 18th May 2016 as I mentioned above, penal dossier 2845/P/2016 was falsified by
same “prosecutor” who falsified 14277/231/2015 appeal in cahoots with a “judge” who obtained
illegally by eluding the randomly distribution system of files set in place in accordance with the
Law 304/2004 for organizing the Romanian judicial system, both dossiers 2220/91/2015 and
1560/231/2016 originating from penal dossier 2417/P/2014 regarding my complaints about the
“prosecutor’s” falsified acts of procedure, making the “judge” either way incompatible according
to article 64 from Romanian Penal procedure code because of it and also because he also
“obtained” earlier a complaint against the “prosecutor’s” illegal acts in 2417/P/2014 as
2220/91/2015 and 1560/231/2016, and falsified a decision in 13761/231/2015, all these being
complaints according to article 340 from Romanian Penal procedure code, all which as I
remember were turned before from the courthouse to the prosecutor's office illegally by “judge”
in 14277/2313/2015 so they wouldn't be judged and now that I repeatedly introduced them back
in court and they were admitted just proves the “judge” from 14277/231/2015’s acts were illegal
as according to article 340 from Romanian Penal procedure code which entitles the judge not the
prosecutor to judge, obviously. The conclusion is that the judge in cahoots with the prosecutor
who falsified 2845/P/2016, did so for the purpose of silencing me about the fact penal dossier
2417/P/2014 was falsified, which I proved in the other dossiers I mentioned which this judged
gathered and covered up with falsified resolutions
4.10.1. On 18th May 2016 from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. I was listening to audio books on
earphones without the “prosecutor” and “judge” accusing me of anything. At 10:30 a.m. suddenly
and immediately after some young people who were writing something down left the
courthouse's meeting, the “judge” called the gendarmes and accused me of disturbing the
quietness of the meeting by listening on earphones which he as the typical liar called ~“activities
with electronic dispositive hidden from sight”, and also accused me of using obscene words and
gestures about him, which is untrue as proven by the witnesses and the courthouse "Judecatoria
Focsani" audio file I obtained on request. This “judge” himself declared in writing he never heard
the words them or saw the gesture although I was in his plain sight all the time and at 10 meters
from him in a quiet room, and even the witnesses he named didn't corroborate to the false
accusations. As short proof I was never indicted and condemned as annex 17 proves, but instead
Page 14 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 232
this criminal group of so called magistrates used the penal dossier to harass me falsifying blatantly
ordinance after ordinance, then started to arrest me almost every day for the purpose of falsifying
the procedures quasi-legally to commit me psychiatrically on Orthodox Easter no less, that is
deprive me of liberty illegally and torture me through poisoning me with Invega as they did
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 which causes severe bodily harm and death, which I’ve
proven in annex 21 also invoking Invega prospect, reason for which I mention no death in
psychiatric detainment in Romania is ever investigated, as pointed out by the press following a
secret service report to the general prosecutor’s office that the psychiatrists are making illegal
experiments on the patients for the pharmaceutical mafia, which I’ve also proven in annex 21
exists by the notorious fact the company that commercializes the Invega fluorine based
neurotoxin was repeatedly sentenced to pay billions for marketing poison as medicine in USA
4.11. The files 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 were put together as last I
heard of them in 2016, after they falsified ordnances for beginning of penal pursuit (investigation
in rem about the existence of the penal offence), continuation of penal pursuit (investigation in
personam giving me the quality of suspect although they claim the penal offence is proven and
that I did it which means is flagrant) and penal pursuit put into action (giving me the quality of
accused which they should've done in the first place if there was an actual penal offence, which
still means I'm innocent according to article 6.2 from the Convention "Everyone charged with a
criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law" (but before that
I'm innocent because there is no case against me, only fictive and ridiculous accusations)
4.12. In conclusion I’ve proven that illegally this organized crime group of “magistrates”
and their accomplices destroyed my life since 2009 leaving me without a home, then in 2012
leaving me without a job which amounts to impossibility to build a family, then for the purpose of
stopping me from denouncing their corruption instigated an interloper to kill me, and for the
purpose of silencing me after proving they’ve instigated the interloper and protected him after,
they
4.12.1. falsified 4 penal files against me: 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and
4329/P/2016;
4.12.2. deprived me of liberty illegally 5 times on 17th September 2015 (10547/231/2015),
11th December 2015 (14277/231/2015), 6th April 2017, 10th April 2017 the between 27th May 2017
and 8th June 2017, as well 4 attempts on 13th, 14th and 27th of April 2017 by breaking into my
mother’s apartment and threatening her which caused her to fall ill with Zoster Area, and finally
forcing me to go into hiding permanently from threat of indefinite to life imprisonment, torture
and loss of life, and
4.12.3. 6 psychiatrically profiled dossiers 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015,
14277/231/2015 (2 instances), 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017, ultimately leaving me
without a country by forcing me to go in permanent hiding in fear of indefinite to life loss of
freedom, torture and loss of life
4.12.4. Total: (loss of home in 2009 ) + (loss of family opportunity in 2010 after first illegal
lay off aided by assurance of corruption in Romania, because the magistrates broke the regime of
work litigation trial celerity) + (loss of job again in 2012) + (suffering and loss of quality of life
caused by permanent bodily harm done by the interloper in 2014 for which I claim 1 million
Page 15 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 233
euros) + penal dossiers + illegal arrests + psychiatric dossiers + (further torture in the period 27th
May to 8th June 2017 for which I claim I million euros), mean 55,555 x 18 + 2 x 1,000,000 =
2,999,990 euro (two million, nine hundred thousand ninety-nine, nine hundred ninety euro). This
sum is equitable in Romanian judicial jurisdiction, and because Romania is a member of European
Union, it is also equitable in European judicial jurisdiction
5. I also claim 142,85 euro pecuniary damage for each day in which either the abuse was
perpetrated that caused me to waste time and energy, the days having terms in court which I
must observe again wasting time and energy, plus 142,85 for each 10 pages of written plea in my
defense which I write myself not affording a lawyer but my time being no less valuable than any
other man's thus I'm entitled to reparation for my time and effort spent on defending myself
which I was obligated to not chosen to, meaning this time and effort is a damage done to me. This
damage includes of course the time I took to document myself on the law, and as fact there are
very few lawyers who actually learn their trade as I observed regarding my case where in each
instance I pleaded net superior to my default advocate paid by the state, and the ones that do
disserve their pay are unaffordable by physical personas to hire thus my effort is justified as being
my legitimate interest to get the best defense available to me and my possibilities - my own
5.1. 142,85 euro is the reasonable remuneration for my day's work according to my last
profession in Romania (IT programmer) and because I did not wish to waste this time but was
taken from me, I regard this time as supplementary "work", thus I claim the usual pay for
supplementary work - 142,85 euro times 2 / day wasted or 10 pages of written plea which I
observe it takes a working day together with case documentation. The sum of 142,85 euro is
obtained by dividing the average salary of an IT programmer in Romania according to all found
statistics on job portals such as bestjobs.ro, of 3000 euro to 21 working days in a month
5.2. Total: 4 penal dossiers + 5 arrests + 6 psychiatric dossiers, + 11 days because I was
deprived of liberty illegally for 12 days between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, meaning 142,85
x 26 x 2 = 7428.2 euro,
5.3. and the minimum numbers files of my pleas in the psychiatric dossiers mean 142,85 x
[(15730/231/2014 - ~10 pages) + (11224/231/2015 - ~40 pages) + (14277/231/2015 - ~120 pages)
+ (4909/231/2017 - ~30 pages) + (12718/231/2017 - ~80 pages)] / 10 x 2 = 142,85 x 28 x 2 =
7999.6 euro, to a total of 7428.2 + 7999.6 = 15427.8 euro pecuniary damages, proven by my
request to bring the mentioned files from the courthouse “Judecatoria Focsani” or delegate
someone to count the files, where you’ll find there are much more - the page count is a rough
minimal estimate as counting fictional money that I may not be awarded for political reasons of
UE against justice, is not my concern right now but my safety and to achieve justice. I mention I
did not count the several terms 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015,
4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017 took, even more if I counted the appeals, extraordinary
appeals and other petitions in and out of these dossiers, penal and disciplinary complaints and
civil summons in court. I also did not count my work litigation files in identical dossiers due to the
refusal of the magistrate mafia to judge 44139/3/2012, 1021/3/2017, 46844/3/2016, 480/3/2017,
41159/3/2016, 44914/3/2015, 861/91/2015 and others. I also mention I did not include any of
the falsified judicial expenses and other falsified tickets meant to blackmail me to renounce
Page 16 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 234
justice, which in Romania can be executed and perhaps within EU anytime meaning even after 5
years in disregards of the terms of prescription, and which Romania should pay for not regressing
against the criminal magistrates that invented the tickets and fictive judicial expenses. Because
I’ve been deprived of my time and energy resulting in loss of quality of life I claim the exact
amount as non-pecuniary damages for satisfaction in return of suffering while defending my
rights, meaning 15427.8 euro non-pecuniary damages
6. Grand total: 3000 euro / month since November 2012 until the present means 5 years
times 12 times 3000 (with the reserve to demand the rest until being put by justice in the
situation previous to crimes committed against me) = 180,000 euro times 2 (non-pecuniary also),
plus 2,999,990 euro plus 15427.8 euro times 2 (non-pecuniary also) = 3,390,845.6 (three million
three hundred thousand ninety eight hundred forty-five and sixty cents)
IV. Background.
1. in 2008-2009 I applied for financial subventions from the Romanian state according to
art. 72-75 from Law 76/2002 for relocating in interest of work. A councilor in “European province”
Vrancea, wive of a local “antiterrorist” secret serviceman stole the dossier from the agent I lodged
the request with, refusing to provide the service expecting bribe. I sued and “lost” because the
secret serviceman used his illicit relations, starting an enmity with the local organized crime group
comprised of judicial functionaries as well, who deprived me of the possibility to pay the advance
on a loan to buy a small apartment, using the subvention
2. in 2008-2009 I’ve also been harassed at work by a group of sociopaths who wanted to
get me fires and get their friends hired instead, who ultimately framed me by falsely accusing me
that I hit a girl from this group on 11th September 2009. I sued and won in 43961/3/2009 at
Bucharest Tribunal and reinstated myself at the same workplace. Same people kept harassing and
instigating, and the company hired some lawyers who falsified 3 disciplinary sanctions against me
to harass me to leave the workplace, lawyers who disciplinarily got me fired again on 2nd of
November 2012. This time the “judges” refused to judge and the civil trial continues to this day
since November 2012, being delayed inclusively by the “European province” Vrancea organized
crime group I’m in enmity with since 2009, which furthered the enmity by their refusal to judge
and delaying the trial leaving me with no work also. The evidence can be extrapolated by anyone
who knows the law from public evidence of dossiers 44139/3/2012, 1021/3/2017, 46844/3/2016,
480/3/2017, 41159/3/2016, 44914/3/2015, 861/91/2015 and others, identical because of the
refusal of the magistrate mafia to judge forcing me to repeatedly file them again at the
courthouse, lately including the “magistrates” themselves to answer civilly and to stop them from
stealing the dossier and falsifying the procedures before judgement to cover-up their refusal to
judge
3. Having no work and no home, living with rent which took half of my salary while the
other half was spent on life’s necessities, I lost the possibility to start a family, and starting 2012
Page 17 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 235
after my illegal disciplinary layoff I sued the criminal organized group in Vrancea county, which
degenerated the enmity in 2014 when
4. “judge” Dita Mirela from Vrancea Tribunal instigated an interloper to kill me, which he
tried on 27th October 2014 provoking me by hitting my mother’s apartment door with his feet
while a “policeman” was hiding to provide false witness no doubt, which he failed because my
mother opened the door first and at least four neighbors also got out alarmed by the noise. The
same interloper on 5th December 2014 hit me on back of my head and threw me unconsciously on
a flight of stairs to make it look like an accident. The proof that Dita Mirela is the instigator, is that
(1) she illegally eluding the random distribution system obtained all the civil files I opened against
the interloper, and falsified the decisions without any shred of motivation and by breaking the
law, and (2) almost simultaneously in December 2014 invented penal file 2417/P/2014 which she
and her “prosecutors” kept secret for 10 months while she also in December 2014 introduced civil
file 15730/231/2014 attempting to put me under psychiatric interdiction which she failed, but she
slandered me publicly. My ex employer from file 43961/3/2009 I mentioned who I am in a work
litigation with, also introduced accessory requests and lost. Meanwhile same “prosecutors” who
invented 2417/P/2014, also illegally obtained all the penal files against the interloper meaning
2222/P/2014 and 246/P/2015 as well as 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015), and falsified all the acts of
procedure even stealing proofs from the penal files, then after 10 months while they closed these
penal dossiers to silence me about them they suddenly claimed there is an “urgency” that I be
psychiatrically committed in 2417/P/2014 because I’m “violent and lack discernment” with no
proof, motivation with which they begun committing grave judicial abuses as proven
Page 18 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 236
2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 in which I haven’t been indicted and
convicted as proven in annex 17, because there’s nothing to be convicted of as the authors of the
falsified penal files know
2. There’s need for a mandatory penal and disciplinary responsibility law for magistrates,
such as if they break the law harming a person on purpose they should be immediately suspended
from office and summarily trialed and convicted as required by the equality before the law
principle. It’s impossible to break the law if you’re mentally sane and I don’t even have formal law
studies and I know the law by intuition having conscience and some Christian education, and the
details of the law just by reading it so I can’t break it because I’m socially integrated and civilized.
A magistrate has no excuse as he spends 4 years in law faculty, he graduates through an exam, he
is admitted in the profession through an exam, he takes grades through exams and every trial is a
veritable exam, so if for me the simple citizen is impossible to break the law, for a magistrate is
beyond any reasonable doubt inadmissible and proof of bad will or criminal intent, especially if
they get the quoted law from me in the file and they still break it. There have been many
proposals by different parties for the law for responsibility of magistrates, but of course they, the
magistrate mafia, refuse officially such a law proposal reach parliament, although they should
have no word in it according to the principle of separation of powers in the democratic state,
proving again beyond any doubt the magistrate mafia in Romania controls the legislative, the
politics thus the government through “political police” as is what notoriously chief anticorruption
“prosecutor” Kovesi does all the time instead of her job, and of course the magistrate mafia
controls the judicial system, which explains the disaster in Romania. Elimination of corrupt
magistrates through a law about the responsibility of the magistrates is the key that can turn
civilization back on in Romania. Maybe that law will also not be applied as the rest, but it’s a start
and will certainly cut off the arrogance these murderous magistrates grew without measure over
the years, lately even claiming they are sovereigns
VI. Other explanations that didn’t fit the main description, being indirectly relevant
1. Article 9 of ECHR - My right to free conscience has been infringed upon by huge
pressures though grave abuses against me by this organized criminal group using the judicial
system and psychiatry as a system of wrongful repression. All these grave abuses are meant to
blackmail me to renounce justice, or to gravely harm me or "accidentally" kill me to silence me for
exercising my right to live a life of consciousness, honor and honest work. By abusing me during
the most important orthodox celebration, Easter, my right to free exercise of religious beliefs has
also been infringed, and I wasn't allowed any religious freedom during my illegal detainment
during the psychiatric commitment - they disallowed me even receiving a prayer book
2. Article 10 of ECHR - My right of free expression has been infringed upon by censorship
th
on 8 April 2017 of militia.freeforums.net forum where I published the penal complaints against
this criminal group of so-called magistrates, which is legal according to Romanian Law 544/2001
article 13. Simultaneously on 10th April 2017 a censorship attempt has been made on my
facebook.com account. Because I believe publicizing the abuses against me is my only defense
Page 19 of 20
ANNEX 23. Page 237
and the first thing to do against criminal sociopaths, I do regard this as a matter of urgency as so
the criminal regard me publicizing their crimes an impediment against their abuses, meaning it
can thwart them from committing even worse crimes
3. Article 14 of ECHR - I’ve been discriminated as I’ve demonstrated regarding the
infringement upon art. Art. 10 from the Convention, by social position in that matter and by the
fact I’ve filed several psychiatric interdiction actions to courthouses “Judecatoria sectorului 3
Bucuresti”, “Judecatoria Focsani” and “Judecatoria Galati” against these “magistrates”, none of
which appear publicly as mine do. The point is that legislation, supreme court and magistrate
council decisions impose the protection of private data that in my case is still public in ECRIS. See
annex 21 about the fact the "judge" on 4909/231/2017 appeal also illegally obtain a request of
disassociation of my name from the file in ECRIS, with which I petitioned the administration of the
courthouse, not the judicial section of the courthouse, the request not being in the "judge's"
jurisdiction to illegally reject demonstrating bad will
4. I’ve notified the local malpraxis committee at local sanitation direction “Directia de
sanatate Vrancea”, who refused to randomly name an expert or committee of experts from the
national register to report the malpraxis because they are corrupt and because one of the
“psychiatrists” is also a member of this corrupt committee. I sued the local malpraxis committee
and the local courthouses delayed the trial until today refusing to judge. I’ve notified this
malpraxis committee for the third time about the recent criminal activity of local psychiatric
forensic service, which of course they’ve ignored. I’ve also notified the local medic’s college which
holds the medic’s disciplinary committee, which refused to give an answer. The Ministry of health
also was notified as well as the whole forensic service hierarchy, and they ignored my petitions
5. For all the crimes committed against me I’ve opened penal, civil and disciplinary
dossiers against the “magistrates” involved which other Romanian “magistrates”, the minister of
justice, the general prosecutor, the anticorruption and organized crime chief prosecutors, the
generals of Romanian police and gendarmes as well as the minister of internal affairs, and the
chief judiciary inspector are trying to cover up, incriminating themselves for complicity in the
same penal file. They were all ignored or covered up with falsified resolutions as proven
6. In conclusion it's impossible as proven because of my social position – member of the
proletariat, political opinion – the state of right and religion – Christian orthodox which is about
righteousness, to avail myself of the protection of the Romania state. See annex 21
Page 20 of 20