TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

ENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECT ASSESSMENT TOOL

Design Project
Title:
Group Members: Group No.
Course Code: Sect
Course Title:
Sem./School Year:
Adviser:

SOs Addressed by the Course
Identify, formulate, and solve
complex engineering problems
(student outcome b)
Solve complex engineering
problems by designing systems,
components, or processes to meet
specifications within realistic
constraints such as economic,
environmental, cultural, social,
societal, political, ethical, health
and safety, manufacturability, and
sustainability in accordance with
standards (student outcome c)
Performance Indicators
Identify an engineering problem
and/or satisfy a need
Formulate engineering solutions to
a given problem and/or need
Solve the engineering problem
and/or satisfy the need
Apply appropriate constraints in the
design process
Apply appropriate standards and
codes in the design process
Use trade-offs to determine final
design choice
Unsatisfactory
1 2
The engineering problem
and/or need is unidentified
The engineering solution to a
given problem and/or need is
not formulated
The engineering problem
and/or need is unsolved
Less than three constraints are
applied in the design process
Appropriate standards and
codes are not applied in the
design process
Less than three options were
used in the trade-offs to
determine the final design
choice
Scale
Satisfactory Exemplary Score
3
The engineering problem The engineering problem
and/or need is identified and/or need is clearly and
specifically identified
The engineering solution to a The engineering solution to
given problem and/or need a given problem and/or
is partly formulated need is correctly and
completely formulated
The engineering problem The engineering problem
and/or need is solved by and/or need is innovatively
adopting existing solved by adopting new
technologies, systems, technologies, systems,
components, or processes components, or processes
and methods and methods
TOTAL SCORE SO(b) ●●●
MEAN SO(b) = TOTAL SCORE SO(b)/3 ●●●
PERCENTAGE RATING SO(b) = TOTAL SCORE SO(b)/9*100 ●●●
Three constraints are applied More than three
in the design process appropriate constraints are
applied in the design
process
Appropriate local standards Appropriate local and
and codes are applied in the international standards and
design process codes are applied in the
design process
Three options were used in More than three options
the trade-offs to determine were used in the trade-offs
the final design choice to determine the final
design choice

TOTAL SCORE SO(c) ●●●

Use the techniques, skills, and
modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
in complex engineering activities
(student outcome e)
Apply principles of ethics and
commit to professional ethics and
responsibilities (student outcome
h)
●●● to be computed by the system
Identify appropriate techniques,
skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary in the design process
Use appropriate techniques, skills,
and modern engineering tools in
the design process
Demonstrate ethics by submitting
or presenting a design project that
cites references
Demonstrate professionalism by
submitting or presenting the design
projects on schedule as planned
Techniques, skills, and modern
engineering tools are not clearly
identified in the design process
Techniques, skills, and modern
engineering tools are not
appropriately used in the design
process
Design project submitted or
presented does not cite
references
Design project is not submitted
or presented on schedule as
planned
MEAN SO(c) = TOTAL SCORE SO(c)/3 ●●●
PERCENTAGE RATING SO(c) = TOTAL SCORE SO(c)/9*100 ●●●
Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and
modern engineering tools modern engineering tools
are well identified in the are appropriately identified
design process in the design process
Techniques, skills, and Appropriate techniques,
modern engineering tools skills, and modern
are appropriately used in the engineering tools are
design process accurately used in the
design process
TOTAL SCORE SO(c) ●●●
MEAN SO(e) = TOTAL SCORE SO(c)/2 ●●●
PERCENTAGE RATING SO(e) = TOTAL SCORE SO(c)/6*100 ●●●
Design project submitted or Design project submitted or
presented partly cited presented completely cited
references based on Turnitin references based on
results Turnitin results
Design project is submitted Design project is submitted
or presented on schedule as or presented ahead of
planned schedule as planned
TOTAL SCORE SO(h) ●●●
MEAN SO(h) = TOTAL SCORE SO(h)/2 ●●●
PERCENTAGE RATING SO(h) = TOTAL SCORE SO(h)/6*100 ●●●

Evaluated by: Date:

Signature over Printed Name

Continued at the back……

 TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES
RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION OF DESIGN PROJECTS

Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to deliver effective oral presentation in English.

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

CRITERIA
1 2
Delivery Presenter mumbles,
mispronounces terms, and makes
serious and persistent grammatical
errors throughout presentation.
Presenter speaks too softly to be
heard by many in the audience.
Visual Aid There is no visual aid used during
the oral presentation
Organization There is no logical sequence of
data/information
Content The presentation covers irrelevant
data/information
Presenter speaks clearly and
loud enough to be heard by
most of the audience; makes
relatively few grammatical
errors, and pronounces most
terms correctly.
There is visual aid but does not
enhance the presentation
Presenter follows logical
sequence but fails to
elaborate.
The presentation lacks
relevant data/information
SCORE
3
Presenter speaks clearly and
loud enough for all in the
audience to hear; makes no
grammatical errors, and
pronounces all terms correctly
and precisely.
Visual aid enhances
presentation
Presenter follows logical
sequence and provides
explanations / elaboration.
The presentation covers
complete and relevant
data/information
TOTAL SCORE ●●●
Mean Score = Total Score / 4 ●●●
●Rating = (Total Score/12)*100 ●●●

RUBRIC FOR STUDENT DESIGN PROJECT REPORT

Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to write a design project report that illustrates effective writing in English.

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

CRITERIA
Content (Substance)
Format
Coherence (Logical flow of discussion)
Grammar, Spelling, Writing Mechanics
(punctuation, italics, capitalization, etc.)
1 2
The report presents irrelevant
data/information
The report does not follow the
prescribed format
The report does not present a
logical flow of discussion
There are many grammatical and
spelling errors, and writing
mechanic violations
The report lacks relevant
data/information
The report follows some of the
prescribed format
Some parts of the report
present a logical flow of
discussion
There are occasional errors and
violations
SCORE
3
The report presents complete
and relevant data/information
The report fully complies with
the prescribed format
The whole report presents a
logical flow of discussion
The report is free of errors and
violations
TOTAL SCORE ●●●
Mean Score = Total Score / 4 ●●●
●●Rating = (Total Score/12)*100 ●●●

Communicate effectively on Deliver effective oral

complex engineering activities with
various communities including
engineering experts and society at
large using appropriate levels of
discourse (student outcome j)
presentations Use the mean score from the rubric for oral presentation of design projects ( rate in ●) ●●●
Write a design project
report that illustrates Use the mean score from the rubric for design project report ( rate in ●●) ●●●
effective writing in English
TOTAL SCORE SO(j) ●●●
MEAN SO(j) = TOTAL SCORE SO(j)/2 ●●●
PERCENTAGE RATING SO(j) = TOTAL SCORE SO(j)/12*100 ●●●

●●● to be computed by the system