Rejublis ofthe Philippines JECHNIC: UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES 1” College of Law POL ‘SE SYLLABUS OUTLINE IN LABOR LAW 2 R_RELATIONS (JDLL 321 . ajored by Aty. Caroe &: Geo Ur, Proleason) BOOK FIVE. LABOR RELATIONS Tile H POLICY AND DEFINITION cou! ing @nd negotitions® (Including valuntary arbitration, mediation, and Chaptor }- POLICY Art, 218, Dectavation of Poligy- Overview ‘1 Primacy of iee colecive bef Cconelliaton in setting disputes). Free trade unionism and uniifd labor movement to promote socie! justice. Enlightenment of workers.coqceming fir rights and obligations. Adequate administrative machinery in setting labor’ industnal dispute, Stable, dynainic, and Just indhstrial pace. Workers’ partioization n decition and policy making Political democracy in soltect¥ve hargaining SeSReN (Chapyer Hl- DEFINITIONS. Art. 248, Definitions 7, Employer-Employee Relationship i} Brothertood, iat Unity Movement of the PH. vs. Zamora, G.R. No, 48645 (Jen. 7, 1987). 2, ‘Emolayor’ vis-d-via “Employes” | ()” eaut University Ys. Bautista, GR. No. 1-24278 (Des. 27, 1966). iL) Associated Labor Union vs. Borromeo, 26 SCRA 88 (1968). Hi) PAL vs. PALEA, 19 SCRA 483 (1987). 3, Labor Organization as Ente : 1) Aled Free Workbrs Untot) vs. Cia. Mantime, 18 SCRA 268,271. 4, Labor Dispute i l) San Miquel Corp| Employees Union-PTGWO, of al. vs, Hon. J.G. Borsamira, as Prosiding Judge ef RTO Branch 186-and Sen Miguel Corporeition G.R: No. 87700 (uns #3; 1990). 5. Ramedigs in Labor Dispuies: if - «Tif Hl NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION Ghapterl- CREATION AND COMPOSITION =| Att, 220. National Labor Retations Commission: Ad. 274, Headquarters, Branches and Pi 4, NURG: Noture and Organization “L adinitetive Supervisin by he DOLE Seeretery 4.2.A Colegial Bady with administrative or rule-making functions, vinelal Extension Units evethiy 13 The NLRC Rales of | Art, 222. Appointment and Quelifications Ar. 223. Salaries, Benefits, and Other Em Chayfor tk POWERS AND DUTIES duvet toluments (Part |. JURISDICTION) Ast 224, Jurisdiction 6f Labor Arbitars:and the Gommission 1, Compulsory Arbitration By La} oF Arbiters 4) PAL Ys, NLRC, 2. NLRC Appeiiate Proveeding: -P. No. G5159 (Doo. 22,1989). Not Pertof Arbitration 3, Labor Atbiter’s Jurisdiction, in, General: Ly Hawaien-Philippine Company vs. Gulmaticn, ot af, G.R. No, 106231 (Nov. 16,1994} Ms ‘ancl i) San Miguol Cor Employgee Union. PTGWO vs. Hon, Beroamra (bid,) "Un Yea LR ae vee 4. Venue; Worker's Opiton: Waiver i) Dayag, et ai, v3. i) PNB Ws, Gaber ii hy Almives vs, tnt pee Tach Gorp.GR. No, 162404 (Jan. 21, 2006) anlzaros, NLRC, G.R. No, 124199 (March 6,196). G.R. No. 157010 (June 21,2005). Phitranco Service Eaterptises, inc. vs. NLRC. and Nieva, G.R. No, 124100 (Apri 14,1998). 5. Jurisdicton ‘Over ULP Cases} Gross Violation of CBA i) i) Nationat Union of Bank Eippioyees vs. Judge Alfreda Lezano, G.R, No. 56434 (dain. £9, 1996). 6. Jurisdiction Over Termination] ub IManiia Mandarin Employees Union vs. NLRC, G.R. NO, 76989 (Sep. 29, 1987). putes Sen Miguel Corpl vs, NLRC, GR. Ho, 108001 (March 18,998).it} Austria vs, MLC 124282 (Aug. 1 & Cobui CRy Cantrat Phil. Union iflssion Ccrp. of 7 Day Adventists, G.R. No. 1090). | 6.1 Jurisdiction Over Inire-Corporate’Dispules Transferred from SEG to RTC (RA 8798 passedon suy 19,2000). i) Dy etal ys Fortune Coment| .C, GR. No. 6854d (Oct. 27,1988). [Corp. val NLRC, G.R. 79762 (dan.24, 1994), Msiniand Consttiction Cg. vs. Movitia; GR, Mo. 178088 (Wav. 23, 1996). Tabangvs, NLRC, G.R. No. 121143 (lan, 21, 1997). Nacpii vs. international Bfoadcasting Corp., G.R. No. 144767 (Maroh 24,2002}. vid Prudential Bank and Trust Co. vs. Reyes, @.R. No. 141093 (Fav, 20,2097). 7. durisdictio Over Money Chal : 7.4.Only Money Claims Not Arising from CBA i) Sen Joso ve. NLRC and Ocean Terminal Services, inc. GP, No. 121227 ( Aug. 17, 1988). 7.2. Money Ciaims Must Have Anger {rom Empleyment i) San Miguel Corp) vs_ NLRC, GR No. 80744 (May 37, 1988). it) Popsi-Coia Boiting Co. vg. Martinez, G.R. No. L-S8877 (March 18, 1982), 7.8. Money Ctelme of Coop. Tlnpleyees 1) Perpetual Help Creatt Codpersuves, inc. vs. Feburade, GR. No. 121948 (Oct. &, 2001). 8. Jurisdiction Over Giaims for Damages! i, ‘Suario vs. Bank of the Phil. isiands, &.R. 50450 (Aug. 25,1089). Bj Padmero vs. {niet liate Appoitete Court, G.R. No. 72644 (Dec. 14, 1987), wy LIMV8, NERC, G\R. No. 79907 (Merch 16, 1989). jv) Sweet Lines vs. NLRC. GIR. No. 79675 (March 48,1989). v) Bane vs. Han. Veldovila, GR. No. 128024 (May 22000}. 9, Jurisdiction Over Sirkes and Lockouls 10. Jurisdiction Over OF W's Mpney Claims oF Dismissed iy PNB vs. Cabansag, G.R No. 187010 { June 21, 2005). 1) Royal Crown intgrnational vs. NLRG, @.R. No. 78085 (Oct. 16,1989}. 16,4. Pretermination Under 1) Marseman tanning. A. No, 8042 jancy, Ine. ¥8. NLRO, GR. No. 127195 (Aug. 26, 1999). 10.1} Section 10 Uncotstititional :) Serrano ve, Galiant iitime Services, ete, G.R. No, 167644 (March 24, 2009). it) Skippers United Pacitlo vs, Doda, GR, No. 170088 (Feb, 8, 2072). tt} «= Sameer Oversos 44. Jurisdiction Over Wage Disto} Placement Agenay vs, Bajara.st at, GR. No. 170029 (Nov. 24, 2012), fiom 42 Jurisdiotion Over Dieputes Fp-Comprervise Setitements Art. 298. Powers of the Commission Rule-Making Power Power io Issue Computsory, Contempt Power Power to Gonduat Ocular Nopeen Adjudicatory Power. Appalta i): Pondoo vs, NLP Power to Issue Injunction ar o ip Urbames vs. CA. i) The Hongkong 8] 22,2001). 8.1. Injunction by Labor Aabit 8.2. injunction from NLRC, Nol iy Art, 228, Oculer Inspection ‘Art. 220, Compulsory Arbitrators 24, 1981). Art 227, Tachnical Rules Not Binding 1. Proceedings Before Labor Power to Investigate and Her Dispules Wi peotion Agjudicatory Power. a : i {Part 2. POWERS) Processes , CR. No. 116947 (Oct. 3,1996). Tempordyy Restraining Oxter SSS, GR. No. 117864 (March 28,2001). [Shanghai Banking Corp. Employees Union vs. NLRC, G.R Nia. 113641 (Nov. {ras “angilary power" remaved in 2002 and 2006 NLRC Rules. the Proper Remedy Againet Employee's Dismissal PAL va. NLRC, G.R. Mo. 420567 (March 20, 1998). rendered obsolete and repeated by Seo. 18 of BP Big. 190, approved on Aug (Part 3. PROCEDURE} iter or the Commission ce Resort ta Amiceble Settlement 41.1, Substantial Evidence as | Quantuth of Proat i Vitho, et al.vs. NLRC. GIR:-No. 124484 (tune 2, 1997) it). Gelmart industries (Phit), ine. ve. Leogardo, G.F No. 70644 (Nov. 6, 1887), 1.2, Cardinal Rights in Quast Judictaf Rroceedings 1) Ang Tibey vs, CIR, 69 Phil.335 (Feb, 27, 1940). i) Cofurnbia Dev. Corp. vs. Minister of Labor, GR. No. 8789 (Dec. 29, 1986). it) Rural Bank of Ssh Miguol (Bohol), ine. ve, NLRC, G.P. No. 82144 (March 8, 1989) 4.3, Verification 1)” Pfizer, ino, ve. Galan, G.Ry No, 143389 (May 25, 200%).fi) Food Terminal, 14.Prohibited Pleadings an: 2, Mandatory Conciliation and 2.1.Compromise Ercourag i). General Rubber! 2.2. Quiielaim and Waivers 2 Olacaa, at af. vs 3. Motion to Dismiss 3.4. ’MotuProprio” Dismissal i) | Paps! Cola Botti 3.2."Res Jiudicata’ as Reaso} 4) Dali, et at, ¥s, 9.3.No Diamnissal of Copia i) Camara Shoss 51989}. 4. Subrniesion of Postion Pay 4.4. Determhation of Nex i). Coca-Cola Botti 4.2. Role of the Labor Arbitar| 4,3. Non-doppesrance of Par €._Sudmission of the Case for 5.1. Position Papais as Basis| i Gandara Mil St 6.2.Lack of Verlication, Not: vs, NLRC, G.R, No, 143382 (Apri 27, 200). Motions, [Mediation Gonforence and the Blnatag Effect of Sompromise Agraement ind Footwear Comp. va.Diilon, G.R. No, 76988 (January $1, 1989). NLRC, Ot a1, G, R. No, 81390 (Aug. 29,7989). ‘Compiairt Based on Prescription ig Co. ¥8. Guanzon, ot al, G.R, No. 81162 (Apri 19, 1989). to Disniies Complaint jnoiorg, C.F. No, 50864 (Dac. 10,1890). t Despite Death Kepisinen ng mga Manggegewa se Camara Shoes, G.R. No. 6320-09 (May 3 and Roply ty of Heating or Ciarifeation Conferance rs Phil Ho, vs, NLRC. G.R. No. 78787 (Deo. 18, 1980). lin Heaviig and Clarilcatory Conferance ies; Postonement of Hearing and Clerificatery Conferences Decision fof Decisjon iy ve, NLRC, G.8. No. 126709 (Dec. 29,1998) ‘atl i) Muntio vs, Sun Vallay Realy, tic., GR. No. 67272 (June 30,1936). 1: Precision Elect 5.3.Due Process: Opportunt i) > Rural Beak of Marquez vs. Sect Lora Motors,"he| fv} Almoite va. Pact wos Com. us. NERC, G.R. No. 88657 (Cot 23,1980). to bo Heard ‘Miguel (Boho), In. vs. NLRC, G.R. No, 82744 (Maren 8.1989). {etary of Labor, GR No, 60865 (March 16,1989). ts. Freritlia Ditton, G.R. No. 82896 (Nov. 7,1980). Arohiioote & Engineers, inc. GR. No. 73500 (duly 10,1986). vj. Singson vs. NLRC and PAL, G.R. io. 122389 (June 19,1997). 6. Suspension of Proceedings 7. Filing and Service of Plead iga and Decisions i)” Rubberworet os 1), bie. NLRC, @.R. No, 126773 (April 14,4006), 7.1. Service of Notices and 7.2. Proof and Completeness! ations of Servi 1) Adainson Oranalo Ecveabonal Istvan, Ine. ve. Adameon Unversity Facil, 6.R. No.B6819 5 (Now: 9, 1989). 3) Pebon, et at, vs, } LRG ahd Senior Marketing Cop, GR. No. 120457 (Sep. 24, 1998). 4) UERM Employees Union-FFWvs, Ministry of Labor, GR. No. 75838 (dug 34, 1989) 8. Resolutton of Doubt in Law 4) = & Decision of Labor Arbiter i Evidence ) Prangen ys. NLRG, G.R.No. 126529 (April 15, 1996). . i Nigatlo v8. NLRO, G.R. NO. 125840 (Sep. 17,1998). 10. No Motions for Reconsideretion and Patitions ‘or Relief from Judgment Art 228. Appearances and Foes i) Renton Cons H} Bank of P.1. Emmy Bh) Cebu dnetitute oF] fv] Palecol vs. Fer v) "Mario, etaivs. Chapter tll: APPEAL Ast. 228. Appeal 4, Grounds of Appeat 3¢ Ne Motion for Reconsider ion Ent Co., ine. vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 126625 (Sep, 18,1897). syees Union vs. NLRC, GR. No, 69746-47 (March $1,1989). rachnoiogy: (CIT) vs, Ople.~169 SCRA 60S (April 75,1988), -Calfofa,:162 SCRA TIC (#990). amie, 8 et., G.R. No. 149763 (July 20, 1982), lon of LaborArhiters Deoialon Period f¢ Appeal from Labor Arbiter 3.1, Ten Gelardar Daye: 1). Wieden Shigping 1) Morilo vs. Sun Wh 3.2. Under the 2008 NLRC Ri 3.3, Date of Receipt by Mall i) NIA Consutt is. Marino, Services, inc, v8, NLRC, oleh, G.R, No, 3801 4-12 {July 20,1882). lay Readily, inc, G.R.No. 67272 (sue 30, 1988). les of Procedure : NLRC, G.R. No. 108278 ian, 2 1997). 3.4, Fallurg to Give Copy of Appeal to Adveree Party Within Ten Days dj _* Medorn Fishing Gear Labor Union vs. Noslel, @.R. No. 53907 (May 6,1986). 3.8, No Extension of Period 3.6. Perlatis Generally Wanda} ij Lava Tracing. He. vo. Leogardo, Jn, G.R, No. 73246 (Sep. 20, 1986}. i) Narag vs. NLRC, 4. Where to File Appeal 1G.R. No, 88626 (Oct, 26,1988).5. Requisites for Perfection of Anpsel : 6 Frivolous Appeat i} Garcia va, NRG, et al, GR, No. 11049¢ (Nov. 18,1996). 7. Payment of Appeal a iy” Asdavs. oe ‘of Labor, 138 SCRA 696. ii) > GW. Tan Mig. vs. NLRC} GR. No, TOBG6 (Feb. 70,1980), 8. Anpeat Bond; Filing on Time] Exceptions 1) Calubay vs. NERC, G.R No. 119289 (April 12,2000), 3 Rosewood Proapssing, ine. vs. NLRC, G.R. Mo, 116476-B4 (May 21,1008). fi) Samaer Oversens Placertont Agency, Inc. vs, Levariino, G.R. No. 153942 (June 29,2000). Wu) Borja Estate, at pi vs. Spouses R. Balad and R. Ballad, GR. No. 152650 (June 8,208), v) Star Angel Hendicraft vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 108974 (Sep. 20,1994). vi} Computor innovations Cénter, ef af, v8, NLRG, GR. No. 152410 (June 28, 2005). vi}. Fornendez vs, NLRC, G.R, No. 105692 (tent. 26,1998). vil) UERR-Memoria| MecioaliCenter vs, NLRC, GR. No. 110419 (March 3, 1997). ix} Pan Am Emptoypes Assi, vs. NLRC, G.R, No, 74279 (Oct, 12,1686). 8. Records end Transmittal 10. Etfect of Appeal of Arbiter’s Decision | 40.1." Execution of Reinstatement Pending Appeal 10.2, Effect of Perfectjon of Appoat on Exooution 11, Frivolous or Diatory Appeals of other Agencies ‘12. Appeais from Decisions of ofher Agericies 1A. Proveedngs Bere the Corfiasion : 43.4, Issoe on App i) Roche Phils vs. mo, GR. No, 83335 (Oct. 5 19689). 13.2, Technicat Rules Not Binding = i Clarion Printing House, ife. vs. NLRC, G.R. No, 148372 (tune 27,2008). ii) Pracislen Etpeirdnice Carp, v9. NLRC, G.R. Na. 86887 (Oot. 23,1988). i ii) PTST Com. vs. NLRC, GIR. No, 80600 (March 21,1990) 13.3. Coreitation’ Mediation: 434. Goneiitation 5 48.8.» Olssenting Opinibn 18.6. * inhibitor 14, Form of Decision, Resolution and Order 144 Ressonad Ravelsal | Ay Coca-Cola Bots Phi, log. ve.Hingpit, at al, G.R. Na 127236 (Aug. 25, 1998). Extended Meaning of ‘Appeat” under Article 223:NLRC May tesue Wat of Certiorer hi Triad Security &|Atied Services vs. Onaga, et al. G.R No. 160874 (Fan, 6, 2006). 48. Certified Cases (from the Setretary of Labor oF the President of the Philippines). 48. Finally of Decision of the Ge ission and Entry of Judgment, Motions for Reconsiveration 7) verdin v8. NLRCland Goadman Text, G.R. No. 719268 (Feb. 23,2000}. i) Pavia vs. NLRC] G.R_ No, 126768 (dune 16,1999) ii) Sadol vs, Phipings Kao, Ihe., G.R. No. 87530 (Juas 13,1890). 47. Appeal ‘rom the Nationel:Lakor Reiations.Commission ATA, ‘Review by "Gertovar "by the Court of Appeals; the St. Martn case i) ‘Sh Mertia chs vs. NLRC and 8 Aricayas, G.R. No, 130866 (Sep. 16, 1998). 14 17.2.” When aad Wherp to File Petition 1) Universal Robind Comp. v4. C.A, GR No. 144978 (Jan. 15, 2002). 4) LTS Phi Corp. 4, Malet, GR. No, 159024 (ten. 12, 2005), iii) OSI Shipping Phi, inc. ys. ALC, G.R. No. 138193 (March 8, 2903). 473. Effect on NLRC'S Decision {frpee shall not sy execuljon unless # TRO Is lssyed by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme jut 74, pact fo Labor Secretary Abolished 478. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies; Motion for Reconsideration Raquired i) NLU ws, Sscretely of Lanor, GR No. 41459 Dac. 16, 1987). ii) —_Univarety of imahecutete Conception vs, Secretary of Labor, G.R. No. 142557 (dune 25, 2004), Wi) Manila Pear! Corp. vs. MgniléPaad independenl Workers Union, G.A No. 142060 (Aprt 15, 2005). 18. Cettifcate of Non-ForumStippoing iy Carsito tad Dela Cota vs. NLRC and Colgate Patnolive Phiioines Gorp., GR, No. 110944 (ine 28, 2007) 1) Santos va.Court pf Appoojs and Pepsi Oola Products, O.R. No. 141947 (duly , 2001) 49. Disposition by the Court of Appeais | 18. Remano : Industriel Timbe cop vs. NLRC, G.R.No. 83678 (January 20, 1989). 49, Dismissal of App: b) Bongay vs. ie ae GR No. 77188 (Maret 14, 1988). 19.3. Findings of Facty Generally Final i) Macrigal Compaby, inc. vs. Zamore, GR No. 48237 & Madrigal & Company ve. Ministor of Labor, G.R, No, 42029 (dune $0,4967). 4.) Mani Manderin|Empioygss Union v8. NLRG, GR, No, 76989 (Sep. 21, 1987).fi} Buti, at al, vs| 1A. Exceptions i slasular Lite Assurance) il). Nioano vs. NL ii) dosavs. NRC, 20, From CAto SC; Only Guest i} Peopie of the i) Moiro Transit Att. 290, Execution of Decisions, Orders] 4. Article 224 's Execution, No! 2. Execution upon Finatity of 3, Genera! Rule: Regional Trial fovolvad) ij Detaventures Re ii) Yupangeo Cottel Art, 231, Contompt Powers of the Beare: Ait 232, Bureau of Labor Relations 4. BLR Jurisdiction and Functio 2 2.4.0.0, No.40.03 Sun Vaily, at a, 6.R. No, 67272 (tune 30,1988), Co, Lid'vs. C.A., G.R. No. 126850 (Api 28, 2004). Rb, GR. No, 426340 (Sep, 17, 1998) (G.R. No. 72588 (Oct. 15, 1986). ion of Law, Rule 45 Hi v8. Hon. Sandiganbavan, GR. No. 186394 (Jan. 21, 2008). janization, inc. v8. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 142433 (Rov. 19, 2002). jor Awards: Appeal, Procedure ision or Order [Court Cansot [save injunction Against NLRC (when no thitd-party claimant is sources ve. Hon. Femendo Cabato, G.R. No. 116126 (March 9, 2000). Mitis, Ine. ve. Court of Appoats, G.R. No, 126322 (January 16, 2002). ry of Labor Title ll BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS ms Infer-Union and Intra-Uinion (bisputes;s {P.0. No, 40-03 2.2. Bifect of Pendency of inte invetnion and related labor relations disputes 2.3. Apnea Extent of BLR Autority 1) Litex Employees, fh) Kopisanan ng i 4, Katarengang Pemberangay, 1) Montoya vs. E8¢ Art. 233. Compromise Agreements ‘Association vs. Eduvale, 79 SORA 96 (1977). nggegapang Pinagyekap (KMP) vs. Trajeno, 134 SCRA 238 (1986) Nol Applicable to Lebor Disputes ayo, G.R, NOS, 82211-12 (March 21,1989) ‘At. 228, tdoreamont of Codes 1p Labor Avbtere (Repealed by Batas Pambansa Sig, 230) Act, 204, isauance of Subpoenas Att. 236, Apocintment of Bureau Person Art 236, Registry of Unions and Flle of C} At ae Prohibition on Certification Etec Ail 288. Privileged Communication Chapter REGISTRATION AND CANG} A‘, 238, Requirements of Registration Ast. 281, Action on Application 12. Danial of Ragietration Ait. 243, Addillonal Requirements for Fed: { let iective Agreements ton ("Cotireot Bar’ Rule) ‘Title v= LABOR ORGANIZATION ELLATION ‘Ait. 224. A (240) Chartoring ane Creation of @ Loca Chapter lerationsior National Unions 1. Distnetion between “Collective Bargaining’ and "Dealing wih Employer’ 2. Registration Requirements 3. Colloctive Bargelning Urft (CBU) | 4, Corsttution, By-Laws, aha Reguiations 5. Provisions Common tHe Registjation of Labor Organizations and Workers’ Association @ Afliation : 4) Adamson & Adelson, Ind, vs. OR, 127 SCRA 286 (1984). 7. Disaffiiedton 1)” Volkschel Labor Union vs, BLR, G.R, No. £45824 (June 19,4985). i) Phil. Skylanders vs, NLRG. G.R. No. 127374 (lan. 21, 2604). 7.1. Local Union is the Princt at, Fedefation the Agent i). Eilsco-Etrof Labor Union {NAFLU) vs, Nortel, G.R. No, L-41955 (Dec. 29, 1977). 7.2.When'te Disafilats Tanduay Distifeyy ve. NLRC, 149 SORA 470 (1087). fi) Associated Workers Unioh-FTGWO vs. NLRC, G.R. Nos, 67269-69 (dudy 30, 1990). 8) Alfance of Netionatist & Genuine Lebor Organization (ANGLO-KMU) vs, Samanan ne mga Manggagewang Nagkeka|sa.sa Mania Bay: Spinning Mis at J.P. Costs, @.R. No. 148662 Cy 8, 1998). 7.3.Dicafilaion Must be by Major Qecision 42 Vilar ve, inciont 7.4, Disefftiation: Effect on Qo Vilar vs, ino 7.8. Disafftiaton: Effact ofi U i). Phil Federation GIR, NO, L-GN2E9-84 (Apr 20,1983). gal Status (ie). fon Dusk Poticleunt Workers ve. C::R: 37 SCRA 711.4) Volksohel Labo; jsafillation; Efiect on Associated ty Revooation of Charter 8.1. Efect of Cancellation o 9, Merger of Consolidation 40, Change of Naine 8 10. Ast. 244, Coneeitation of Registration; Ap} (Repealed by E.0. Il, Dec. 24, Art. 248. Grounds for Cancellation of Unt Att. 248, Eoulty of the Incumbert Chaptar I~ RIGHTS AND GONDITIO i Union vs. BLR, G.R. No. 148824 (.iune 19, 1986). ting CBA; the “Substitutionary” Dootrine ra Unigi PTGWO ve, NLRC (ibd) Region of Fadaraton or National Union on Locale ‘Chapters Effect of Change of Name peat: 206). mn Registrtion Atl. 238-A (245) Effact of Pelion for Cancetation of Ragietration, Art 235-4 (247} Voluntary Cancellation oF Ri istration. (3 OF MEMBERSHIP Att. 290, Rights and Conaltions of Membeiship ina Labor Orgentzation Nature of Relationship Between i} Hits of Toador 1, Duty of Court to Protact Lat i) ~ Hairs of Teodor ii) 1909). 2. Gheck-Offs ard Assessmenis 3.1.Assessments, Like Dues), 1) Vengeo va. Tre ay Hi) ~ Galbedores vs, WW) Patacofvs. Pure| 2.2. Three Requisites fo Col 1) ABS-CBN Sup 11, 1999). 3.3. Check-Otf of Agancy Fi 3.4 dilegal Chook-OfF Grou 3.5 Employer's Liabitty inc! ay Holy Cross of B: 3.3.Jurisdiction Over Check 1) PNCC vs. Ferre if Hie RIGHTS OF LEGITIMATE Lf Rights of Legitimate Labor Orgs Ant, 242-A (261) Reporte} Chay Aa 2 Att. 282 Coverage and Employses' Righ 1. Right to Organize Cannot De| i). Souther Philp! Employees of Nonprofit Inst FEU-Dr. Nica Excaption: Empioyee-Mern ap Excaptlon te Exception: Ase: i) Nupva Eolfe ©: . Excoption: international Org i}. Intemational Cal Kapisanan ng. (Gop. 28, 1990) 5. Exception: Reigious Objectets, 3) iy His 2 8 8, 4. 5. Kepatvan sa Callafa, GR. i). i, Hh) University of tte fu)» TUCP Us. Mita, Att. 264, Ineligiolity of Managerial Employ Categories of Employees, Attzeia, otal. va, inion ang Ys Mambars: M. Cruzvs. C.i.R., 30 SORA 9717. ers from) Unjust Expiottation by Oppressive Employers and Unicn Learlers 4. Cruz.vs. CAR. bie) vohnson & Johnigon Labor Union-FFW vs, Dirootor of Labor Relations, G.R. No. 76427 (Feb. 24, May also be Checked Off Ino, G.AL; No.-74453 (day 6, 1989). Faecio Communizaios ofthe Pa. no. ys. Sveretary of Labor, GF Ho, 77969 (Jan. 9, 1988}, rrajano, G.P. No, 76087 (Sep. 15, 1986). \Farrer-Gatels, G.R. No. 86933 (Fab. 26,1990), Spacist Assseamient sore Efrpioyees Union Members ve. ABS-CBN Comp, G.R, No, 106818 (March for Cangeliation jeck-Ofl Arangerrent wva0 Coliége vs. Joaquin, &.R, No. 11007 (Oct. 18, 1996). Off Dispaltoe Caliejai 1¢7 SCRA 204 (Nov. 11, 1946). OR ORGANIZATIONS izations iat Requirements. } Title V- COVERAGE to Seit Organization’ [Bargainad Away ines Fedoration of Lebor (SPRL vs, Callafa, GR. No 80802 (April 24, 1969) ition ot |Reyas Medical Foundation, Inc. vs. Trajano, G.R. No. 76275 (duly 31, 1987). ofa Cooperative I San Jose Sieh Senos Sooper inc. vs. Ministry of Labor, GR No, 77284 (May 24, 1986). jafon, Kot Union Inc. (NEECO) Employees Agsr. v8. NLRC, GR. No. 11606 (an.24,2000). inizationg ofc Migtation Conmission vs. Hon. Pura Calleja, G.R. No, 85760 and 7@ Manggagawa et TAC Sa IRRE-OLALIA vo. Secretory of Labor, QR. Nc. 69331 * iglesia ni Kristo’ Mernbere Vietoriano vs. Efzeide Rope Workers” Union, G.R. No, L-25246 (Sep. 12,1974). and Cancing Division (Tupas Local Chaptor No, 4027) vs, Hon, Pure Ferrer £-62914 (June 29, 1958). Ho] Associated a ‘Unions {ATU} vs. Nariel, 88 SCRA 96. Ar 253, Right of Employees in the Publid Service! lCourt of Apneais, G.R, No. i-45693-94 (Sep. 14, 1990). ‘SSS vs. Commission on Audit, G.R. No, 149240 cduly 11, 2000). [Founctetjon vs, BLA, 6.2. No. 85050 (Apri 12, 1989). , BR, No. 49877 (May 4, 1889). fees fo cin any Labor Organization; Rightof Supervisory Employees i). Zemboanga Wodd Praducta, no. v3. NLRC, G.R. No. 62088 (Oct. 15, 1989) 2, inelighitty of Menagars 1) United Pepsi-Cola Supervisery Union ws. Laguesma and Pepsi-Cola Products Pol, ine, G.R. No, 122226 (Maren 25, 1998),fi) Bulletin Publishing Co,, ine. vs. Hon, Augusto Senchoz, 144 SCRA 42% (1986) 8. Evolution of Suporvcors’ Right to Organize 9.4 First Period: Under the Ihdustiia! Peaoa Act i) ol ton cp. vs. Filol- Supervisory & Confidential Employees Assn. and CLR., 46 SCRA 5 72) : i) Cater Filipino Managersiared Supervisors Assn. vs, OLR, 47 SCRA 112. 32 Sevond Period: Under tis Lator Code Betas Amendment by R.A. No. 6715 i} Bulletin Publishing Ca, ino. vs. Sanchy, 144 SCRA 428 (1986), 3.3 Third Period: Under the Labor Cove Before Amendment by RAG715. A ene 1g figa Manogagawa sa Triumph intl vs. Pure Ferrer Calieja, G.R. No. @6015 (Jan. 4. Test of Suipsrvisory Status f 4.1, The Power to Racommehd 5 ft. 246-8 (268) Efecto Indus se Mims of Employees Outside thn Baralning Unt ip National Merchandising Corp. ve. CR,GR No, L-18710 (March 30,1963). 4.2. Exempies of ineffective or Clerical Recommendation t) Laguna Cofleges ¥S. C18. 25 SORA 173. 5. Sagregation of Renk-andsFit and Supervisare i) Toyota Motor Pit. Comp, ve. Toyota Moter Phil, Labor Union and tha Secretary of Labor and Employinent, G.R. No. 121064 Feb. 19,1997). Hy Durioo Stazenger {Phil.jinc. vs. Hon. Seorstary of Labor and Employment & Duniop Slazenger Staff Assoviafion-APSOTEU, G.R. No, 134248 (Dec. 17, 1908), Wi} San Migued (Monddue Paskeging Praducts Plant} vs. Mandaue Packing Products Plant Monthlies Rank-sno-File Union, GR Ho. 162356 (Aug, 16, 2005). iu) Nagros Oriental Electric Cooperative { (NORECO 8) vs. Secretary of the Department of Labor and Eimployment.G.R. No, 143615 (May 9, 2001). wy Tagaytay Higianeis Int! Golf Club, inc, va. Tageylay Highiands Employees Union-PTGWO, GR. No. 142000 (Jarl. 22, 2003). wi) Aitas Litogrephig Service, inc. vs. Undersecretary Lagisama, GR. No, 98586 (Jan 8, 1992), vil}. De La Salle University Medical Center and College of Modising ve. Lequeame, G.R. No. 102004 thug. 12, 1998), 6. Confidential Employses : 6.1.Fiest Swing: Inclusion. Arjong Renkeand-File i) ‘Southam Phil, Federation, of Lebor vs. Calloja, G.R. No. 80862 ( April 24, 1989). 8.2. Second Swing: Exciusion from Renk-and-File 1) Golden Farms, the, ¥8, Ctlela, G.R. No. 787755 (duly 19,1969) ij Philips indushial| Dey. vs.|NLRC, G.R. No. 88057 (June 25,1002). : 8.3. Third Swing: laclusion Ajnong Supervisors: 4 i ‘Phil, Phospate tiizer Corp. vs. Torres and Phiiphos Movement for Progress, ino. GR. No. 98050 (March 17,1994), 6.4.Fourth Swing: Incluston Among Monthly Peic Rank-and-Fite i Goldon Ferme, inc. ve. Secretary of Labor, G.R. No. 102130 (July 26,1994), €.5."Dookne of Necessary. thalvelian’ (Linied Exclusion) 1) Nationa’ Assosigtion of Taco Unions (NATU)- Republic Pleniers Bank Supervisors Chantor vs. “: Hon. Ruban Tarfes, GR lita: 93468 (Nae. 29, 1994). ay Pier of 8 Arrastrd vs. Confesor and Generel Maritime and Stevedoring Union, @.R. No. 119854 (Feb. 13, 1998), i i} MetroLab Industies ine. vs. Confessor and Metro Drug Corp, Employees Assn, — FFW, GR. No. 108855 (Fab. 28) 1996.) 44) Manila Electric Pompany va: Hon. Socrotary of Labor and Meralco Employees and Workers Association (MEWA), G.R. No, 127598 (Jan. 27, 1999). v) San Miguel Cor, Supervisors and Exempt Union, af al, vs. Laguasma, GR. No 140309 (Aug. 5, 1997}, 7. Seourty Guards May Join Rank-and-lfile or Supervisors Union Ast. 256. Nonabridgment of Right to Self-Organization i ‘Title|VI- UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES ‘Chapter |: CONCEPT: b Adt 267, Concept of Unfair Labor Practiog and Procedura for Prosacution Thoreot Chapter fl- UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES OF EMPLOYERS Art. 258, Uniair Labor Pradtices of Eimployers | 1. Conditione Procodont io U.LP. Charge i) Mariano vs, Royal interosean Lings, G.R. No. L-12429 (Feb. 27, 1987). 2. No ULLP : Vaid Exerose of anagerjent Righis or Prerouatives. Ly” Phllcom Employdes Union vs. Phil. Globel Communications, @.R. No. 144316 (July 17, 2006). i). Rubberworld (Phfs,) Ina. ve. NLRC, C.R. No. 78704 (duly 19,1980). 4} Bulletin Publishing Corp. vs, Sancho, GR. No. 74425 (Oct. 71,1980), fv} Bondoc v8..6:4R), G.A. No. 33955 (Jan, 26, 1986), it 7Enriquez vs Zam Wiso and Co,, 1 Philippine Grepi ‘San Miguo’ Brew 1989). Cases of ULP 3.1. Interference (Art. 248a)| 32. “Vellow Dog” Condition 3.3. Contracting Out (At. 24 2.4. Company-domination of} 35. Disorimination (An, 248 36. Discrimination Because] ¥) vip vit) val) lc. v8. No. 51382 (Dac, 29, 1986). © & Co. ine, Enmployace Union, G.R. No. 87672 (Oct. 13, 1989). ora, lic Arts, Inc. vs, NLAG, @.R. Na, L-80737 (Sep, 29,1988). ry Sales Force Union (PTGWO) vs. Opla and SAIC, G.R. No. 63545 Feb, 8 (Art. 243i) Bo) ‘Union (Art. 248 dl) 5: lof Testimony (Art 248 f) 3.7. Violation of the Duty to Bargain (Art, 248 9) 9.8.Paid Negotiation (Ait. 248 3.9. Violation of the CBA {Ar ULP. in Given Perlad She i} Dionela, ot al. ve. Chapter It- UNFAIR LABOR PRACT ‘Ax. 259, Untoir Lebor Practices of Labor | Restraint or Coercion by Lat Union Induced Diseziminatl Refusal to. Bargain *Featherbedding* and “Make! bo 248i) juld Be irjcluded in Single Charge CLR, G.R, No, £18924 (Aug. 91, 1960). (CRS OF LABOR ORGANIZATIONS Crganizaéons t Organization; interference by Union is Not ULP Work” Arrangements Title Vi- COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND ADMINISTRATION OF AGREEMENT (Part 1. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING CONCEPT AND PROCEDURE) Ast. At Att Art Procedure in Coflestive Bargain Be Duty to Bargain Colfectively in 32. Meaning of Duly lo Bargain Gol 263. Duty to Bargain Collectively Whi 4 14. First ULP in Bargaining: 1) Capito! Mecteal & i National Unioin'o 1.2.Secopd ULP. in Bargai 1) Manila Eleciris 1.3. Thied ULP In Bargaining, 1) Hongkong and 16,1997). i} Samatvanyy Mex UWP).G.R. No. . ii). Calegto ds San : EAmbas, GA. fv) Staaclard Chaite 76,2004). v)— Lakes ng Mer 40, 1082). 1.4, Fourth ULP in Bargalnin no Four Forrna of ULP in Gare e Absence of Collective Bargalning Agreements foctively ; n Thare, Exists a Collective Bargeining Agreament ng ‘ailure of Rofusal to Mest and Convene enter v8. Trajanto, G.R. NO. 156690 {June 39, 2005). Bank Elnpioyeae vs. Minister of Labor, 710 SCRA 274 ing: Evabing the Mandatory Subjects io. vs. Hon. Secretary of Labor anid MEWA, G.R. No. 127598 (Jan. 27, 1999}. [Bad Faith Shanghai Banking Comp. Employees Union us, NLRC GR. No, 128038 (Nov. gerwa se Top Farm Mi. ~ United Workers of the Philippines (SMTFM- 43806 (S8p.7, 1998). fuan de Letion v8. Association of Employees and Faculty of Letran anct 2. 14147 (Sep. 18, 2000). yd Bank Employees Union (NUBE} vs. Coniesor, of al G.R. No. 114974 (June jpgawang Makabayen vs. Marcelo Enterprises, G.R. No, L-38258 & 38260 (Nov, : "Gross" Violation of the Contract 2, Ratification by the CBU; Mandatory Requirements. 3. Registration of CBA Ait. 264-A, Terms of a Collective Bargatr} 1. Duration ofa CBA i) San Miguel Corp + Comp, and 8a 2. Etfeotivty and Retoactivity of ing Agreémont Employees Union-PTEWO vs, Confesor. San Miguel Comaration, Reqnalia aCBA | fea tne, GR, No. 174262 (Sep, 19,1968), sembing aK. MEWA, G.R. No. 127598 (Jan, 27,1999). foyeles vs. NLRC and Nestle Phil. Inc. G.R. No. 91026 (Dec. 19, 1990) Center, inc. vs. Hon Ruben Torres, G.R. No. 99305 ‘June 20, 1993). 2.4 Effectivity of GBA Congiuded After Six Months from Expzation of Old CBA, 1)” BMaraico vs. Quis 4} Union of Filpino! Hi) St Luke's Made 1) Cruz, stai vs, n. Catsja, GR. NO, 87332 (Aug. 13, 1990). 3. Extension of Effectivity of CBA, When} Valid 3.4 Ten-year Sus} a Alt. 266. Injunction Prohibited jancion OF CBA, Rivere, etal va. Reply, @f el, G.R. No. 195547 (fen. 23, 2004),Title Vile COLI (Part ECTIVE/ BARGAINING AND ADMINISTRATION OF AGREEMENT . EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION AND REPRESENTATION) Art 298. Exclusive Bargaining Representation ang Werkers’ Participation In Policy and Decision-Making Art, 287. Representation issue in Organized Establishments et 288 Poiton io Unorganized Estab Ait, 259. When an Employer May Fie Art. 271. Appaal From Certification Elect 4. Determining the Bargaining 4.4. First Methoa: Va 4,2. Second Mathod i)” PAL Empk BY) Assoaiatéd ‘8. Third Method 2. Direct Certficaten No Long i)” Colgate Pai 8. Conducting the C.E 4. The Winnet as Sole and Ex: Title Vita» GRI Ail. 272. Gievence Machinery and Volun Ait. 273. Juriedicton-of-Voluntary Arbitra} Ast. af “A. Procedures: a Art. 276-8. Cost of Volimtary Arbitrator STRIKES AND LOCKOUT) LockouTs| Cha; 1+ STRIKES AND " Part 1, REG Axt. 277, Stites, Pickling, and Lockout L Gonsttutional guersntos of 2. AValid Strike must ne Base i)” Natonal Union 4908) Factors in.Legalty of Sbike fishmenis = tion jon Ordets Union: Overview of the Methods luntary Recognition (V.R,) under D.O, No, 49-03 Gertilealion Etection {G.E,) 3s" Association vs. Calleja, G.R, No, 76673 (June 22, 1986). rade Unlon (AT) ve, Tiajano, G.R. No, 75521 (deere 20, 1986), nsent Election br Able Att. 268-A (270} Employer as "Bystander’. i. Ine, VS. Blas Opie, G.R. No. 73684 (lume 30,1828), lusve Rapresentative IEVANCE MACHINERY AND VOLUNTARY ARBITRATION tary Asbjtration fore or Panelof Voluntary Arbitrators Jurisdiction Qver Other Labor Disputes ¢ in And Volubtary Arbitrators Fee : Title vill iS AND FOREIGN INVOLVEMENT IN TRADE UNION ACTIVITIES. LATIONS AND LIMITS OF STRIKE AND LOCKOUT loht to stéice under Article Xil, Sec. 3, ofthe 1987 Philippine Constitution. ‘on a"1:bbor Dispute’ if Workers in. Hotels ve. NLR and Peninsula Holel, G.R. No, 125501 (March 6, 3.1. First Factor: Statutory Hrohibition 1)” S88 Employes Association (SSSEA) ve. Court of Appeals, 176 SCRA 686 (1669) i) Bangelisan, ef at vs, Coujt of Appesis. The Civ Sarvice Commission, aiid the Secretary of DEGS, GR. No| 124678 (July 31, 1997). 4.2.Sacond Factor: Proeedufal Requirements e 22.1. Notice of Skike 3 3.2.2. "Gooiing-oif Period : 32.3, Strike Vole 3.2.4. Slrike Voted Report i) Alatianal Federation of Sigar Workers (NFSW) va. Ovejeras, G.R. No. 59743 (May 31, 1982), ft) Gold Glly integrated Port Service tne, (INPORT) v8. NLRO, ot af, G.R. No, 103560 (July 6,1995), th) Union of Fitpine] ot et. vs} Nastie Philppines..tnc., ata, G.F, Nos. 8870-13 (Dec.16, 1990) iv) —_Iaterphit Laboralbries Employees Union-FFW vs, Interphi Laboratories ino., of al, G.R. No. 7 142824 (Doo.19,2001). | vy). Suthotal Culgind vs. GA; 9t. Al, G.R. No, 180437 (tay 17, 2006). 3.3. Third Factor: Purpose: Eponomie'and ULP Strike i) Sati Miguel Cort vs. NLRC, SHUCEUIETGWO, G.R. No, 09286 (March 2, 1090) i) Davao Free Froit vs. CR, 60 SCRA 408. i) Pall. Steam Navigationas Co; vs. Phil. Merine Offices Gurld (PMO), G.R. Nos. . 4.20687 and 1-20869 (Oct. 29. 1955). iv) "Tin and Hayuhay ys. NLAC ancl Ropubtio Broaicasting System, G.R. No. 123276 (Aug. 18,1997). 3.4.Fourth Factor: Means anid Wethods 1) Phil. Marine Off 1963). ft} United Semen 1867) fi) __Liberes iabor'tse 3.5, Filth Favtor: Injunction uy [ Union of Fifpio Finptoyel * Guild ws. Conpania Martie, G.R. No. L-20862 and L-20683 (March 9, Union vs, Daveo Shipowners Association, G.R. Ho, L-18778 (August 31, an vs. Philigpine Can Company, 94 Phil 72, bs vs, NLRG, G.R, No. $1025 (Dec. 19, 1890).ti) Phitiead: Mer irs Untori(PTWU) vs. Coniesar, GR. No. 117189 (March 12, 7997}. : Hi) PSBA vs. Norio, G.-R_Ng, 80648 (August 15, 1988) v. in.) ° Sewing Transit nc. vs. Lazaro, 128 SCRA 991 (1984). ¥) UST vs. NERC, |UST Faduily Union, G.R. No, 89920 (Oct. 18,1990). 3.6, Sinth fFactor: Agreement of the Parties i). Philgpine ite, Foundhles, tna. vs. C.LR., G.R. NOS 1-24948-49 (May 25, 1979). 4) GOP-CCP Workers Union vs. CLR, G.R. No. L-33015 (Sep. £0, 1979). 4, Effacts of Defence of "Return to Work Order” 1) University of Sch Agusti vs. C.A., of at, @.R. No, 169692 (Merch 28, 2008). Saumignio Tuco, B.A. Nos, 75271-73 (June 21, 1988). Asian Trensmiskion Corp. vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 77567 (Juno 27, 1988) St, Scholéstiga’t Collage, vs, Han, Ruben Torres and Samahan ng Manggegawang Peng- edukasyon st Sta, Excolestica, GR. No. 100158 (June 29, 1982), ¥) —_Bisayas Land Transportation Company, inc. vs. CLR. end Phitppine Marine Racio Officers Association, 102 Phil, ABE. Vi) Phil Federation pf Petrataum Workers (PFPWY] vs. OLR, 37 SCRA 711 (1971). vy agora Bayan Comp. Réeilly investors & Developers vs. Blas F. Opa, G.R. 0.73334 (Deo. 8 I i Att, 276, Prohibited Activities Ari, 279. Improved Offer Balloting Act 280, Requirement for Arrest and Detention | » ‘(Part 2- Picketing & Other Concerted Activitiag} 4. Pioketing as Phase of Freedbm of Speech i) ~ Ce Loor, etal. ie. Natiariel Labor Union (NLU}100 Phi. 769. 4) Phijppine Bloorting Mil Employees Association vs, Fhiligpine Glcaming Hil 61 SERA 189 (979) 4h) The Insular Lite Assurange Co. Ltd. Employees Association. NATU ve. The insular Life Assuronca Go. idl, No, L-46291 (anuary 30, 1977) 2. Picketing of Neutral Parties gr Bystanders" £) Phil Associatiod of Free Labor Urion vs, Clorbel, -25076 (March 28, 1960), 1)” Lavayway Pubiifeltons, ps. ve, Permanent Concroto Workers Urion, QR. No, L-28008 (Oct. 2, 1984). 3. Other Concaried Actiatiss i 1) Republic Savings Bank, 31 SCRA 226, 232.034. iow at Bublod ny Mangghcyawa (18M) va. NLRO, G.F. No. 91900 (dune 27,1991) Bascon, at al: vi. OA, et a, G.R. No. 144638 (Feb, 3 2004). -Phiipaine Bloorhing Sls; Erintoyess Organization ve. Phil Blooming Mis, GR. 1-34196 (dune 8, 1973). L ¥) Toyota Mofor Pits. Comp; Workors Association, ota. va. NLRO, ef al, G.R. Nos. 155786 and 186769 (Oct. 19] 2607). | 4. Directive to Prosecutors 1) Samiento vs, Jifdge Tudo, GR Nos. 7527-72 (ine 27, 1988) ii}, Aslan Transmiction Corp, va. NLRC, G.R. Nas, 76277-79 (dono 27, 1998) i Wy (Patt 3. Consequences of Concerted Activities) 4. Strikers’ Retention of Employiment i) Bacus v8. Ople| G.R. NG. L668 (Oct. 23, 1984). 4) Progressive Wariers tillon vs. Aguas, 150 SCRA 429 (1987). Hi) __ FSSO Philppidas, Inc. vs. Matayang Maragagewa sa &SSO, 78 SCRA 73 (1977). Strikers’ Loss of Enipioyment Gold City tntegrated Port Services, inc. (NPORT) vs NLRG, Adelc Ebuna, et al,No. 103560 (uly 8,4985). JL)_Assoviation oi tndependent Unions in tke Phil. vs. Cenapro Chomioal Comp, .R. No. 120505 (Merch 26, 1999}, : WL) Great Pacifio Lib Employees Union and RP De'a Rasa ve, Greet Pacific Life Assurance Corp., GR 126717 (Fdb 11,1999) Ghura ve. NLRC|G.R. No| 105778 (Feb, 8.1992). .} Cromwell Commercial Employees and Labor Union (PTW) ve. C...R., £-19778 (Sep. 30, 1966), ‘Who Declares “Loss|of Employment Status?” i Gold Gity integrated Port|Services. inc. (INPORT) va, NERC (bic) |)" PNOC Dockyard and Enginooring Corp. vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 118229 (duno 20,1998). 4, Employer's Right fo Hire Reglacemerits Quriag Strike 1)! Norton Henison Co, & Jackbilt Concrete Blocks Co. Labor Union vs. Norton & Harrison Co. & ~ Jacket Concrets Blocks Co, L-#8461 (Fob. 10, 1967). Feat Univarsly be. Bautista, of of, L-24278 (Doo. 27,1966). Diwa ng Paghekaba-PAPLU vs Fitek, No. L-23980 (Feb.8, 1968). i 108 Damagse i} National Fodoras 192480 (Deo. 1 Chapter Il. Agststante to Labor Organi Act 261. Assistance by the Department ‘Act 262. Assisiance'by the Institute of and E.0251 of July 16,1987 (Chapter i FOREIGN ACTIVITIES: ‘Act 283. Prohibition Against Altona; ‘Act 264. Regulation of Foreign Assietat Exceptions, ion of Ladner, ot al ve, NLRC and Portex Producer and Exporter Cop, B.R. No. 1997), izatlond Labor f hor and Manpower Studies (F.O. 126 of January 30,1987 abolished the ILMAS taced It With the Institute for Labor Studies} ‘Act. 286. Appiicabifty te Farm Tenants ahd Rural NVorkers. ‘Chapter IV- PENALTIES FOR VIGLATIDN Att, 285. Penalties § : Tite x | SPECIAL PROVISIONS Ant 287. Study of Labor Mangqement Relations ‘Ack, 288, Visitorial Powor po Ack. 269. Tiipartism and Tripartite Gonterences Pet. Bo Government Employees : Act Jpt. Misceitanaoys Provisions, 4 . 2 Book Six ~ - 1 POST EMPLOYMENT : Title | ‘Terminstion of Ernploymont - -=(Hart 1. Inlreductlon: Employer's Security of Tenuse} Act, 292. Coverage : ot, 203, Security of Tenure ' 4, Constitutional Guarante: Rance vs. ALR ay ii} "PNB vs, Coben ‘Act204. Regular anei. Casual Employrae) is of Tenure 1, GR Nb. 68147 (June 30,1988), Escarsal vs, NURC, G.RWNo, 90350 (Sep. 2, 1992} jag, G.R.iNo: 187010 (dano"27, £005). «Part 2. Kinds of Employment) 4, Roguiar Emplaymant Hl 1) D3 Leon vs. NLRG, G.R $No.70705 (aug. 21, 1980) it) AM, Oreta & Go, Ino. v8! NLRC, G.R, No, 74004 (Aug. 10.1980) fi) Wack Wack Col & Country Chib vs. NLRC, etal, G.R. No. 149793 (Apri 18, 2005) | 2. Casual Employee : ~ 4). Phi, Geothermet, inc. vsiNLRO, G.R. NO, 82643-47 (Aug. 30, 1990}. Mm) Capuie v6. 1 No. 80653 (Nov. 72, 1990). iv.) Phil American Management Associetion vs. CLR., 6.R. No, 37206 (April 18, 1088). 3. Project Employment f 1) Sandoval Shipping, inc, vs. MLRC, 136 SCRA 674. i) Pa National echelon Carp, vs. NLRC, G.R, No. 88923 (dune 20,1888). ii) FALU.TUCP at all vs. NLRC ancl National Stoal Corp., C.R. No. 100902 (Aug.2, 1004). iv) «2. Motcado Sr. vs. NLRC, GR. No. 79869 (Sop. 5,1994), 4, “Prindipal Test" i) Hilario Rada vs.| NLRC, G.R. No. 96078 (lanuary 8, 1992). olota ve MLR: GR. No, 140828 (Ont. 10,1007) fi) Pemandaz ¥SHLRG and DYE Consuny, Inc.,"G.R. No, 106090 (Fab, 26,1994), 5. “Sessonat’ Employment (Regular Seasonal’ After One Season) i)” Morcedo Hofél Go. vs. CLR? GR. No. 1-18875 (Sep. 30.1963). Hon Hacienda Fatian} vs. National Fedoration of Suger Cane Workere, @.R. No. 148440 (Jenuary 28,2093). : i) Visayan Steveddro Trans, Go. v8, C4.R., G.R. No, L-21696 (Feb. 25, 1967). 6. “Fixed ~ Period” Employmant : WW i) Act. 295. Probationary Employment 4. The Need for Probation uy iy AMeraico vs. NL Bront Sobod!, ink. Gioio vs. NLRG,|G.R. Nos 78603 (January 26, 1991). va, Zemmora, @.P. No.A8494 (Fob, 5, 1280}. International Catpoli Mijration Commission vs. NLRG, ©.R. No, 72222 (dan, 30, 1980) 1G, G.R, Nia. 83781 (Sep. 29,1989). i2._ichig of Probationary Employes Tertnination Only for Causa) i). Cielo ve. NLRC] 198 SCRA 410 (1901) i). Clarion Printing House, th. vs. NLC, G.R. No. 448972 (Jumne 27, 2006). i). AML Orete Inc. v3, NERC, GR. No. 74004 (Aug. 10,1989). iv). Maniia Hote! Corporation vs. NLRC, G.P. No. L-53453 (January 22, 1986), 3. Extsrsiori of Probation : 1)... Meriwase Menofacturing| Inc. vs. Leogardo, J, G.R. No, 74248 (Jan. 26, 1989}. 4 Last day of Provation : i)” CALS Poutty vy, Roco, &.R..No. 180860 ‘ly 20,2002). di)» Alora vs. NLRCend Midttoby, @.72.No, 149859 (Jane 9,2004). 1h) Mitsubishi tdotots Phi. Corp. ve. Chrysler PAI. Laer Union, G.R. No, 148738 (June 29,2004}. 5 Probationary Period for Teaghers | 1). UST vs NLRC, Act 296. Tormination Sy Employer 4. The Right jo Discipine i) a R, NoiG65t9 (Fob. 16, 1900) (Fart 3. Management Rights and the Just Causes of Termination} . NLRC, G.R. No, 87277 (May 12, 1080) NLRC, G.R. No. 74299} (Aug. 11, 1989}. i). Yaoo Chemical Industrie vs. Ministry of Labor, 6.R. No. 75656 (May 28, 1990) Wu)” Meraico vs. NLC, G.. No. 78763 (July 12, 1989), vj Rance, et al. vs| NLRC, GR. No. 68747 (une 30, $988). 2, Just Causes: Serious Misconduct "| i) ~ Piedad vs, Lando Del Nofte Blestric Coop. inc, G.R. No. 73735 (Aug. 31, 1987). 4) Asian Design & fifo, Corp. vs. Hon. Deputy Minister of Labor, G.R. No, 70552 (May 12, 1986). ii) . Luzon Stevadonng Corp.ivs.-C.iR,, L-18683 (Deo. 34,1868). 3, Just Cauca: Wilful Disobedigras | 1) S000 v8, Mercen}tie Corp, G.R. No, 53964-65 (March 16,1987). 4) Cebu Gity Intearated Port Services, ino. vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 86090 (Sep. 21. 1960) Hi) Escobin, etal vb. NLRC; Poftok Integrated Services, inc. (PISI}, C.F No. 118169 (Apri 18, 1908). | 4, dust Cause: Dishonesty, Loss of Confitence i) San Miguel Com. vs, G.R. No. 82467 (June 29, 1989). 1) ~ Firestone Tire &|Rubber Co. of the Phil ve. Larioga, G.R. No, 70478 (Fob, 27,1987). Mh) Mabeze ve. NLAC and Hotel Supreme, G.R. No. 118506 (April 18, 1997} Nu} __ (Midas Touch Fopd Corp. irs. NLRC ark! iis Fe isaae, G.R. No. 111639 (July 29,1996), 5, Just Causg: Commission-of.a Crima or Offense i) Starlie Plastle t}dustro! Corporation va, NLRC, G.R. No, 78491 (March 16, 1989). Hj ® Moroury Drug Gpig. vs. NLRC, G.R. Na. 75662 (Sep. 18, 1980). 6. Just Cause: Analogous Cawes —: 1) Madura vs, Bergquet Consolidated, inc.,.R. No. L-17780 (Aug, 24, 1962), Att.207, Closure of Establishment and Re Att. 206, Disease as Ground for Termine! 1, Authorized Causes in Geney 1) Shoppars Gain AHS Phiippinos| ii) Internation He 2. Introduction of Labor- Savin i)" Phil. Sheot Mota 8, Recundaney 4) Solkt Lines Grp it) Wilshire File Cc fi), Escaraal vs. iu) 4, Retrenctyent i). Columbia Dav, ay (Oct, 26, 1946). HH) ‘Union of Phil. iy) - Aslan Alcohiar ¥) 5 Lopez Sugsr Ca vi)“ Sebugusro vs 5, Closure of Business i) Catatista vs. NLR iy 6. Sale in Good Feith iJ _,San Felipe Neri F Sorrano ve, NLRC, G.R. No. 197040 (let | (Patt 4, Authorized Causes of Termination} joductloniof Personnel ‘an supsrmatt vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 110734 (luly 26, 1996). GR, Ng. 78724 (March 20, 1987). ara, ino. vs, NLC, G.R. No. 60770 (Aug. 10, 1988). Devices Worker’ Union vs. C.LR., 88 Phil 469 8 NLAG, GR, No. 74482 (Nov. 5,1986). if, v8. WLRC, GAR, No, 82249 (Feb, 7.1981) IC, GR. ‘No. 00859 (Sap. 2, 1982}. 27,2009). ‘orp. ¥8. Minister of Labor and Employment, GR No. 87769 (Dae. 29, 1986). Mayon Engineering Workers’ Union vs. Mayon Engineering & Machine Shop, CLR, No. 160-V lication Eripioyses vs, Phi. Education Co, G.R. No. 1-716 (ey 19,1958). . v8, NLRC, 005 SCRA 416 (1999). Ip. vs. FW, G.R. No, 76700-01 (Aug. 30,7990). IERO, G.R, No, 118394 (Sep. 27,1988). IC and Vistovias Miting Co., ine, G-R. Ko. 102422 (Aug. 3, 1998). ‘North Davao Miling Corp. ve. NLRC, G.R. No. 112646 (March 13,1996). Schoo! of Mandaluyong, tne:ve. NLRC, G.R. No. 78350 (Sap. 11,1991). 121 > 7 fi) Manlenos vs. NLRC, GR. No. 143337 (March 2, 1995). 7, Merger & Consolidation i 1) Filipinas Part Services, Inc. vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 97237 (August 16,1991). 8 Aliment oF Disease, : 41 Cebu Royal want (San Miguel Corp.)ve. Dopuly Minister of Labor, G.R No. 58639 ~ (hog.42, 1987) i | PartS, Procadure to Terminate &mployment) 1. Due Procass Requisies (Substantive & Piocedural Due Process) 1) Mangia VS. NLRC and Menia-Widiown Hole}.G.R. No. 124013 (dune 6, 1996). 4). MOG Marine Services, Ine. vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 114319 (July 29, 1996). 2 "Two-Notica" Requirement i i} Tingson Jr, ¥. NLRC, 185 SCRA 498 (1990). i)” National Servicas Com. vs. NLRC, 168 SCRA 122 (1988). Hi} Raffy va.fILRC, 1182 SCRA 365 (7990). 3. Preventive Suspension 1) Giobe-tascksy Gable & Radio Gor. v8. NLRC, G.R. No, 82511 (March 3, 1992). | (Part 6. CONSEQUENCES OF TERMINATION) 1. Under Present Law; Four Kijds of Separaven Pay 14. Fst ind of Separation Pay) Ava Statutory Requirement for Authorized Caunes Under Art. 283 andl 4 : i) % Plantore Produits, Ina. vs. NLRC, G.R. No, 78524 (dem.20, 1989), ‘Sacond Kind of Seppraton Pay: As Financial Assistance i, .agai Distetesel i) PLOT vs. NURCland i Abucay, G.R. No. 80809 (Aug: 23, 1986). 1.3," Third Kind of Separation Pay! Ae Subettluts for Roinsteterent in {Regal Dismissal Cases. 1)" "Padroso, att vs, Gaol GF. No. T0361 (dat, 90, 1980) 14,” Foyt Kind of Sepatation Pay As Employment Benefit from Employer. i) Phil Overseas- Driling & 01 Dev. Comp. vs. Ministry of Labor, B.R. No. 55709 (Nov, 27, 1986). 2. Backwoge’s ~ { i) --" Tonto ws, Leogarda, G.R} No. 77205 (May 27,1991). Hi) Lin vs, MLC. G.R. No. 79807 (March 15,969}. i ‘Sweet Lines, ind, vs. NLRC, GP, No, 70978 (March 16,1980). 3. Basis of Computation of Bachwagos: iTha Rule Before R.A. 6716, The ‘Morcury Drug Rule"; The “Pines City" Ruling; angl the "Busteranta| Latest Ruling’, i)’, Mercury Orig Ob. tne. ve, CLR, 68 SCRA 604 (1974), ii)” Pines Cty Educhtional Center vs. NLRC, &.R. No, 98779 (Nov. 10,1003). i)“ Cemelik Bustamante vs. NLRC and Evergreen Farms, G.R. No. 141651 (Nov. 28, 1996), 4, Dismissal for Cause But Without OuelPrecess; The "Wenphi' Doctrine; The “Serrano” Ruslng; The “Agabon” Rute 4) 1 Wenphi Comp-up. NLRC,\.R. No. 60887 (Feb. 8,999). 5, Sarrano vs, NLRC and isptenn Dept Stare, G.R. No. 117040 (danuary 27, 2000). Agebon vs, NLRG, G.R. No. 158693 (Nov. 17, 2004). * 6. Reinstatement i i) Santos ve. NLRG, G.R, No. 76724 (Sep. 21, 1987) fl) Meralco vs. NLAG, G.R. No. 78703 (July 12, 1989). fii) Pepsi-Cola Botting Co, vs. {WLRC, G.P. No. 101909 (June 23, 1992) Ww), Bsmalin vs. NLRC, G.R. No, 67880 (Sop. 15,1080). ¥} | Globe-Mackay Gable & Radio Corp. ve. NLRC & Salazar, G.R. No, 82511 (March 32,1952) vi). BY. Quijeno vs|Mercury|onug Com, and NLRO, G.R. No. 126567 (July 8, 1956), 6, Damages 1) _ Suerio vs, Bank of P.tne. {8.R. No, 60460 (April 26,1080), 7. Attorney's Fees : 1), Lopez vs, NERC] Letran College: Manta, at al, G.R. No, 124548 (Oct. 8.1998) (Part 7. TERMINATION.BY EMPLOYEE AND SUSPENSION GF OPERATION) Ait. 288 Termination by Emptoyae ~ : ‘Art. 300. When Employment Not Dsemad Terminated Title jl- RETREMENT-PROM THE SERVICE Att. 304, Retirement 4. Retkement Oefined L i)... Btlon vs. South Phil. Union Mission of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, 6. No. 125136 (May 19,1999), i 2. The Previous Lew and Amentiments by R.A. No. 7644 (4983) end R.A. No. B55B (1968), 13i ~ 1} Lora Motors. inp, vs, Drijon, G.R. No, 82895 (Nav. 7, 1980}. i) Oro Enterprises vs. NLRC and Lorota Cosilio, P. No. 190861 (Nov. 14, 1894), 2 Coverage (Handbook of Workers’ Statutory Monetary Benefits Published by DOLE Bureau of Working ‘Conditions, 2006, pp.44-4 : 4. Goneltions‘for Entitlement &@ Retiomiant 1) 4 Brion ve. South|Phi, Unibn Mission of the Seventh Day Adventist Church (ibid). 5. Two Kindgof Retrement 1) Capi ws. NLRC, GR. NG. 120602 (June 17,1987). i) > Mertirar vs. NLRC, GMOR, ino. and 18.A, Javiar, G.R, No. 118749 (Oct, 12,1996}. 6 Enyployer's Option < L : t} PAL va. Alling Ifto's Asgociation of the Phil;"@.R. No, 14368 (dan. 15,2002) fi)» Pantranco North Express vs. MLRG and U Suniye, G.R. No, 98940 (July 24,1906). Ji) Progrossive Doyelopment Corp. va. NLFIC, G.R, No, 128826 (Oct, 30,2000). 1c} “- Cainta Cathois Schoo! ahd Msgt. Mariate T. Balbage vs. Cetnta Gathotlo School Employees Union, GR. No] 151021 (May 4.2006). New Retiement Law Given Retroactive Etfect 1) Gro Entegprisos| ine. vs. NLA (Ibi). & Amount of Retirement Pay : i) + PAL ys, dirine Plots Asgocialion of the Phil. (bk. Retirement Benafite Asidé fiom Separation Pay; Dietnation : i)” University of the East vs. UE Facuily Associaton, G.R, No. 74007 (Jaly 31,967) iy Aquing, ot at. vs) NLRC, G.R. No, 87653 (Feb, 11.1992). fii) | Salomon, et sf. vs. Association of tntematiorial Shiopiig Lines, Ine,, G.R. No. 156317 (April 26,2008), F : 10. Unjustifed Denlal of Retirenqent Banetit 4)". & Razon, ut. vs| NLRO, G.R..No, 80502 (May 7, 1992), 11, Sopatatioh Disguised es Retirement 1) $. Milena vs. NRC and BLTB, GR. No, 60664 (Feb. 7,199). 12, Dismissal fo Avoid Retirement Benefits 1) Reyes va. Phlishine Duplicators, ine., 109 SCRA £89 (1981). 48 Extent Servion of tips . 1), UST Faculty Union ve, NLRC, UST, GR No, 69885 (Auy. 6.1990). Ait 302, Penalties -Att 393. Whe are Late When Conmvite Art 804. Offensas Att 305. Monay Claims Att. 306, Institution of Money Claims: ‘Ait 907. Application of Law Enacted Bry Att 308, Seoretary of eborto Initiate in ‘Act 308. Funcing of the Oversees Empl Ast. 310, Terrrinaton of the Workmen's Att. 317. Continuation of Insurance Poli Att 812. Disposition of Pencing Cases Att 343. Personne! Whose Services are Art. 314, Seperablity Provisions Att. 918, Repealing Oléuse BOOK SEVEN- TRANSITORY AND FINAt, PROVISIONS ‘Title F- PENAL PROVISIONS AND LIABILITIES: ld by Othierthan Naiural Parson f ‘Thig i PRESGRIPTION OF OFFENSES AND CLAIMS: Tile. TRANSITORY AND FINAL PROVISIONS tothis Code ration Of Maternity Leave Benefits pant Development Board and the National Seamen Board Fompensetion Program and Indersaty Bonds Terminated 14