Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

PEOPLE VS.

ANANIAS
96 PHIL 979

FACTS:
Victim received multiple gunshot wounds from herein accused which then ultimately led to the
former’s demise. Before the victim’s death, however, he was able to identify the perpetrators of the
shooting. The trial court found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Hence, this petition.
ISSUE:
W/N the affidavit of the victim should be part of the res gestae.
RULING:
Yes. The hearsay rule excludes evidence that cannot be tested by cross- examination. But there are
exceptions to the such rule. One of them is that provided in Sec. 36 of Rule 130, Rules of Court which
provides:
Sec. 36. Part of the res gestae.— Statements made by a person while a startling occurrence is taking
place or immediately prior or subsequent thereto with respect to the circumstances thereof, may be
given in evidence as a part of the res gestae. So, also, statements accompanying an equivocal act
material to the issue, and giving it a legal significance, may be received as a part of the res gestae.

Another exception to the hearsay rule is the dying declaration. Sec. 31 of Rule 130 provides:

Sec. 31. Dying Declaration. — The declaration of a dying person made under a
consciousness of an impending death, may be received in a criminal case wherein his
death is the subject of inquiry, as evidence of the cause and surrounding
circumstances of such death.

The affidavit is thereby admissible in evidence as an ante-mortem declaration considering that it was
made under consciousness of impending death; the declarant died the next day from the gunshot
wounds he sustained.

You might also like