Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Extraction and Evolution of Fowler-Nordheim Tunneling Parameters of Thin Gate Oxides Under EEPROM-like Dynamic Degradation PDF
Extraction and Evolution of Fowler-Nordheim Tunneling Parameters of Thin Gate Oxides Under EEPROM-like Dynamic Degradation PDF
Extraction and Evolution of Fowler-Nordheim Tunneling Parameters of Thin Gate Oxides Under EEPROM-like Dynamic Degradation PDF
RELIABILITY
Abstract
A new method is presented for the extraction of the Fowler-Nordheim (FN) tunneling parameters of thin gate
oxides from experimental current-voltage characteristics of Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (MOS) capacitors. In
this technique, the classical low temperature FN current model is considered but an improved numerical
procedure has been implemented for the calculation of the oxide electric field - gate voltage relationship. It is
shown that this iterative method leads to an excellent fit of experimental data with theoretical curves for both p-
type and n-type substrates, even in the case of high doping levels. The procedure allows the determination of
both FN tunneling parameters and potential barrier heights at silicon and polysilicon interfaces with a systematic
estimation of the statistical fitting errors on each parameter. It is applied here to the study of the variations of the
FN tunneling parameters of thin oxides submitted to EEPROM-Iike dynamic degradation. © 1999 Elsevier
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
A m0 q3
= (2)
Writing and erasing operations of electrically- m* 8rth%
erasable read-only memories (EEPROMs) are based [ , ~1/2
on the mechanism of Fowler-Nordheim (FN) B 8 ~ | 2 m / ~b03/2
tunneling injection through a thin oxide window. (3)
This charge injection modifies the electrical charge
stored on the floating-gate of the cell state transistor. mo is the electron mass, q is the electronic charge, h
When considering cell programming functions, the is the Planck constant.
FN current (In) must be accurately controlled. For A and B parameters are classically determined by
oxides thicker than 6 nm [1], the FN current is well the plot of ln(IFN/(SEoxZ)) versus 1/Eox (called FN
modeled using the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin plot) which must be linear according to Eq. (1) [2-7].
(WKB) approximation and is expressed as a function Values of IFN are directly obtained from experimental
of the oxide electric field (Eox) by the classical data while values of Eox are more difficult to be
expression [2] : precisely estimated. The following expression of Eox
as a function of the gate voltage VG may be used :
IFN =SAE2xexp(---~-B) (1)
tEoxJ Eox _ VG -(VFB +(~s +~bp) (4)
where S is the injection window area, A and B are tox
the two tunneling parameters, depending on the where V ~ is the flatband voltage of the Metal-
effective electron mass m in SiO2, and on the energy Oxide-Semiconductor (MOS) structure, tox is the
barrier height ~boat the injected interface : oxide thickness, and ~ and ~sp are respectively the
silicon and polysilicon surface potentials (we neglect
0026-2714/99/$ - see front matter. © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S0026-2714(99)00117-1
880 S, Croci et al. /Microelectronics Reliability 39 (1999) 879-884
Table 1 10-s • , . j • , • , • ,
Table 4.
Comparison between different (00)effextraction methods, as
introduced in the text.
1E-5
4. Conclusion
I E -7 •
,..q
1E-9.
IE41;
1E-13.
1E-15
?
•
uRn,
II
3
u.l
I |
4
II
, • .
•
5
, nip
I~
6
. ,
7
.
8
,
a
.
In summary, we have proposed a new method for
the extraction of the FN tunneling parameters of thin
gate oxide MOS capacitors. We have shown that this
method leads to a very accurate fit of the FN
characteristic for p-type and n+-type substrates, both
in accumulation and in inversion regimes. The main
important points of this iterative algorithm are : i) its
capability to be use for very high substrate doping
concentrations ; ii) its range of validity including low
and high voltage domains of the FN plot ; iii) its
~E-S
robustness and its easy computer implementation•
References
~ 1E-9
[1] M. Depas, B. Vermeire, P.W. Mertens, R.L. Van
Meirhaeghe and M,M. Heyns, Solid-State Electron• 38,
1E-13
1465 (1995).
[2] M. Lenzlinger and E. Snow, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 278
1E-15 Illl Illlll z I ~1~
, • , . , • , . j - , . , • (1969).
.2 -3 -4 -5 .s -7 -s -9
[3] S. Horiguci and H. Yosshino, J. Appl. Phys. 58, 1597
Gate voltage (V) (1985).
Figure 6: Comparison between the experimental data (I), [4] E.O. Sheybani and Y.L. Chiou, Proc. of Southcon'94
our method (o) and an approximated method (-) in which (Mar.94,Odando, FI), 149 (1994).
the oxide electric field is calculated with the Q-M theory [5] Y.L. Chiou, C.H. Sow, G• Li, J.P. Gambino, and P.J.
Tsang, Proc. of 9th Biennal University-Govemment-
while ~ is considered constant for a n+-nitrided sample.
Industry Microelectronic Symp. (Jun.1991, Malboume
1E-3 I '
F1), 89 (1991)•
[6] G. Keiger and R.M. Swanson, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 5710
1E-5
,E-7 ~e (1981)•
[7] Z.A. Weinberg, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 5052 (1982).
[8] S.N. Mohammad, G. Fiorenza, A. Acovic, J.B. Johnson
,~ 1E-9 it and R;L. Carter, Solid-State Electron. 38, 807 (1995)•
[9] T. Ando, A;B; Fowler and F. Stem, Rev. Mod. Phys.
58, 437 (1998).
[10] F. Stem, Phys. Rev. B 5, 4891 (1972).
IE-13.
[11] C. T. Hsing, D.P. Kennedy, A.D. Sutherland and
I I IIImlllll I i I ; '~
1E-15 i ~ • ~r • i , i
K.M. Van Vliet, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a)56, 129 (1979).
3 4 5 6 7 8 [12] J. Sun6, P. Olivo and B. Ricco, IEEE Trans. Electron
Gate voltage (V) Device 3_2, 1732 (1992).
[13] T. Ando, Phys. Rev. B 13, 3468 (1976).
Figure 7. Comparison between the experimental data (m), [14] P. Olivo, J. Sun6 and B. Ricco, IEEE Electron Device
the fit obtained with our algorithm (o), the fit obtained with Lett. 12, 620 (1991)•
a linear field dependent ~ (A) and the fit obtained with the [15] T.H. Ning, C.M. Osbum and H.N. Yu, J, Appl. Phys.
imposition ~(Eox)=ao-alEoxm-a2Eoxv3 (x) for a virgin n÷- 48,286 (1977).
thermal oxide in the accumulation regime. [16] K.R. Hofmann, C. Wemer, W. Weber and G. Dorda,
IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 32, 691 (1985).
(a0, al and a2 being constant). The theoretical curves [17] R. Benz, D. Cantarelli and P. Cappelletti, !EEE
obtained from these models as well as from our Trans. Electron Device 37, 1081 (1990).
algorithm are compared in Fig. 7. We show that the [18] Z.A. Weinberg, Solid-State Electron. 22, 11 (1977).
accuracy of all these methods, including our iterative [19] R.J. Van Overstraeten, G.J. Declerck and P.A. Muls,
approach, are very similar. This result confirms the IEEE Trans. Electron Device 22, 282 (1975).
[20] C. Plossu, J.M. Voisin, B. Bos, C. Raynaud, R•
validity of our approach for the extraction of (~0)¢ff in Bouchakour, P. Boivin and B. Balland, J. Non Cryst.
the case of various kinds of MOS structures. Sol. 245, 85 (1999).