Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syllabus Global Politics of Energy and Environmental Change 2019
Syllabus Global Politics of Energy and Environmental Change 2019
Syllabus Global Politics of Energy and Environmental Change 2019
Room: 354
Regent Street
Wednesday 14:00 to 17:00
25 September - 11 December
2019
Email: W.Ostrowski@westminster.ac.uk
Welcome and Introduction:
This handbook provides all the information you need regarding the module’s content
and assessment requirements. It includes the module’s aims and learning outcomes,
assessment weighting and assessment criteria, the lecture and seminar topics, essay
questions, reading lists, rules for referencing and bibliography, and university
assessment regulations.
Module Aims:
To encourage students to critically evaluate the relevance of contemporary
debates in international relations and political economy to the study of energy
security, energy markets and climate change.
To provide students with an in-depth understanding of the actors that have
shaped the global politics of energy.
To explore the history of fossil fuels and alternative sources of energy.
To analyse the full complexity of energy security dilemmas.
Learning Outcomes:
By the end of the module the successful student will be able to:
Critically evaluate the relevance of contemporary debates in international
relations and political economy to the study of energy security, energy
markets and climate change.
Critically evaluate the history and dynamics shaping global energy security.
Critically assess the different elements of the global energy map such as peak
oil, petro-state, global institutions, resources nationalism, hybrid energy
companies, local communities, global NGOs.
Develop a critical understanding of the concept of energy security.
Locate, comprehend and engage with relevant primary sources and academic
texts.
2
Activity type Category Student learning and
teaching hours*
Seminar Scheduled 36
Total Scheduled 36
Independent study Independent 164
Total student learning and teaching 200
hours
Lecture Overview:
1. Introduction to Global Politics of Energy and Environmental Change (25 Sept)
2. Political History of Global Energy (2 Oct)
3. International Relations and Energy (9 Oct)
4. Energy Markets (16 Oct)
5. Energy Security and Energy Poverty (23 Oct)
6. Essay Development (30 Oct)
7. Political Economy of Energy and Transparency (06 Nov)
8. Politics of Global Energy Industry (13 Nov)
9. Sustainable Development (20 Nov)
10. Low Carbon Transitions: The Case of UK (27 Nov)
11. International Politics and Climate Change (4 Dec)
12. Local Politics, Populism and Climate Change (11 Dec)
Contacting me:
As module leader, I will be happy to answer any questions you have about classes or
about your progress in the module. Please e-mail me to set up an appointment. My
office hours are from 14:30 to 17:00 on Thursday, but if these are difficult, it can
occasionally be arranged to meet outside of office hours.
Assessment rationale:
The presentation is designed to develop students’ planning and communication skills.
The presentation challenges students to demonstrate critical awareness of key issues
in the global politics of energy and environmental change and to deploy theoretical
and empirical evidence to engage confidently in academic communication with their
peers.
The essay is designed to test students’ analytical, critical and research ability.
Assessment criteria:
The presentation should demonstrate that students have achieved a comprehensive
and critical understanding of the specific theoretical, methodological and factual
3
issues/examples discussed, and managed to effectively summarise and present a piece
of work within a seminar setting. In marking the presentation, academic staff will
consider:
the degree of advanced knowledge and understanding of the subject matter;
the range and appropriateness of the literature used (and/or empirical
material);
the quality of critical analysis applied to concepts, ideas, theories and/or
empirical/factual information;
the logical development and coherence of the argument;
the clarity, coherence and effectiveness of the overall presentation (including
clarity of delivery and observance of time limits).
The essay should demonstrate that students have understood the issue(s) they are
addressing, made themselves familiar with the appropriate literature and had the
ability both to assess the different arguments and to formulate a critical analysis
comprising a coherent rationale in support of their position. In marking the essay
academic staff will consider:
the quality of the content - the breadth and depth of analysis - and the quality
of the critical comment;
the structure – the logical development and coherence of the argument;
the range of literature used in making the argument; and
the presentation and layout – including the competence with which sources are
used.
Presentation
The deadline for submitting the power point presentation on Blackboard supporting
the oral presentation is on the day the presentation is delivered.
Presentation Topics
4
Session 5: Energy Security and Energy Poverty (23 Oct)
Presentation Topics:
Energy Poverty;
State Capitalism/Mercantilism and Energy;
Security of Demand
5
Essay
You must submit an electronic copy of your essay via Blackboard by 13/January/2019
by 13:00. The essay should not exceed 4,000 words.
Note that your presentation and your essay cannot be on one and the same topic.
The module addresses a number of wide ranging themes and you are free to either
design your own essay question (which has to be discussed and approved by the
module leader) or to answer one of the questions from the list below.
1. Why does wealth from oil, gas or minerals exports have a different impact on
the development of political regimes and the wider economy than wealth
derived from other sources (for instance, manufacturing and services exports)?
3. Critically assess the realist claim that state competition rather than markets
define the politics of global resources.
4. How has the rise of National Oil Companies changed the global politics of
energy?
5. ‘Energy security for the West has often meant insecurity for the rest.’ Discuss.
7. Compare and contrast at least two different initiatives that were put forward in
order to address the ills of the resources curse.
8. How has the peril of climate change changed our understanding of energy
security?
9. ‘We can have secure, reliable and affordable supplies of energy and, at the
same time, manage the transition to a low-carbon energy system’. Discuss this
claim.
10. Why do southern countries tend to have different positions from their northern
counterparts over global environmental politics? When is this ‘North-South’
distinction useful and when is it an over-simplification?
6
DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC REGULATIONS ON COURSEWORK
B) INAPPROPRIATE SUBMISSION
Unless specified in the assessment information, all coursework must be uploaded to
Blackboard. It is the student’s responsibility to ensure that they follow the correct
procedure for submission. If a piece of work is submitted incorrectly it may not be
accepted by the Faculty or it will be subject to lateness penalties as detailed above. It
the student’s responsibility to ensure that they can access their Blackboard account
prior to the assessment deadline. Please note, email submissions are not allowed
under any circumstance.
C) SUBMISSION OF COURSEWORK
All coursework on this module is submitted via Blackboard only. It will
automatically be scanned through the Turnitin Plagiarism Detection Service software.
You will receive separate instructions about how and when you will receive feedback
on your work.
7
IF YOU SUBMIT YOUR COURSEWORK LATE BUT WITHIN 24 HOURS OR
ONE WORKING DAY OF THE SPECIFIED DEADLINE, 10% OF THE OVERALL
MARKS AVAILABLE FOR THAT ELEMENT OF ASSESSMENT WILL BE
DEDUCTED, AS A PENALTY FOR LATE SUBMISSION, EXCEPT FOR WORK
WHICH OBTAINS A MARK IN THE RANGE 40 – 49%, IN WHICH CASE THE
MARK WILL BE CAPPED AT THE PASS MARK (40%).
First class essays (70-100%) will: address the question or title; follow a structured
and signposted sequence; demonstrate familiarity with the relevant literature; present
an analysis and evaluation of the ideas and theories discussed; reveal internal
integration and coherence; use references and examples to support the claims and
arguments made; provide detailed references and sources in the bibliography or
reference section; be written in good and grammatically correct English. Differences
within the range are usually attributable to differences in the quality of analysis and
evaluation and internal integration and coherence.
Upper second class essays (60-69%) will: address the title; follow a structured
sequence; demonstrate familiarity with relevant literature; use references and
examples. The difference between essays in this class and a first class pieced of work
is often the quality of the analysis and evaluation presented and the degree to which it
is integrated around its central theme.
Lower second class work (50-59%) may show weaknesses with regard to a number
of the features mentioned above. Generally, the analysis and evaluation may be poor,
so that the work fails to convey an unified consideration of the topic under discussion.
Often, for example, ideas and theories will be presented but not related to each other,
so that the reader is left to draw his / her own conclusions. This may also mean that
the material presented is not used to address the question but is simply included as
vaguely relevant. Finally the sequential structure of essays in this category could
8
usually be improved.
Third class essays (40-49%) tend to have weaknesses with regard to most of the
features mentioned above. They tend not to address the question in a precise way, to
be poorly structured and show little by way of analysis or evaluation of the ideas
presented. This, of course, means that they are not well integrated. Finally, the grasp
of the literature demonstrated in such an essay may not be good, though it will be
adequate in the sense that there are no major misconceptions or obvious omissions.
Failed essays (30-39%) are, at best, manifestly failing with regard to a number of the
features mentioned above. In particular, their demonstration of familiarity with the
literature is usually poor and their structure difficult to discern.
Essays which are of extremely poor quality will receive marks that are under 30%.
We use the full spectrum of marks.
9
Week 1 (25 September)
Seminar questions:
Seminar reading:
Chapter 12: ‘Energy Security and Climate Change – Tensions and Synergies’ by Peter
Christoff in Anceschi, Luca, and Jonathan Symons, eds. Energy Security in the Era of
Climate Change: The Asia-Pacific Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. [E-book:
Core] (Available on Blackboard)
Additional reading:
Robert Keohane With Jeff Colgan and Thijs van de Graaf (2012) ‘Punctuated
Equilibrium in the Energy Regime Complex’, The Review of International
Organizations, Vol. 7, Issue 2.
Ekins, Paul, Mike Bradshaw, and Jim Watson, eds. Global Energy: Issues, Potentials,
and Policy Implications. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.
Further reading:
Daniel Yergin. (2011) The Quest: Energy, Security and the Remaking of the Modern
World, Allen Lane. (Introduction and Conclusion).
10
Goldthau, Andreas, ed. The handbook of global energy policy. John Wiley & Sons,
2013. [E-book: Core]
Helm, Dieter. The new energy paradigm. Oxford University Press, 2007.
Coyle, Eugene D. and Simmons, Richard A.(Eds). (2014). Understanding the Global
Energy Crisis. Purdue University Press.
MacKay, David. Sustainable Energy-without the hot air. UIT Cambridge, 2008.
Timothy Mitchell. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil, Verso:
London, 2013.
11
Week 2 (2 October)
Seminar task:
Compare and contrast the role of a) the state, b) private, transnational and
national companies, c) civil society across three histories.
Seminar reading:
Chapter 3: ‘Renewable Energy: a new identity and a new industry’ in Toke, David.
Ecological modernisation and renewable energy. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. [E-
book: Core] (Available on Blackboard)
Additional reading:
Timothy Mitchell. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil, Verso:
London, 2013.
Ekins, Paul, Mike Bradshaw, and Jim Watson, eds. Global Energy: Issues, Potentials,
and Policy Implications. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.
12
Week 3 (9 October)
Seminar questions:
In what ways will ‘the climate change blowback’ impact global energy
security? What are the strengths and weaknesses of Michale Kalre’s
argument?
Why do Goldthau and Witte argue that the global energy security is no longer
a zero-sum game? Is the argument that they are outlining a coherent one?
What are the key features of the global oil market? How vulnerable is it to
political and economic disruptions?
Seminar reading:
Klare, Michael T. "Climate Change Blowback: The Threats to Energy Security." SAIS
Review of International Affairs 35, no. 1 (2015): 61-72. (Available on Blackboard)
Hughes, Llewelyn, and Austin Long. "Is There an Oil Weapon?: Security
Implications of Changes in the Structure of the International Oil Market."
International Security 39, no. 3 (2015): 152-189. (Available on Blackboard)
Chapter 1: The Role of Markets and Investment in Global Energy (pages 15–29) by
Albert Bressand in Goldthau, Andreas, ed. The handbook of global energy policy.
John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-Book: Core] (Available on Blackboard)
Andreas Goldthau and Jan Martin Witte. ‘Back to the future or forward to the past?
Strengthening markets and rules for effective global energy governance’.
International Affairs 85: 2 (2009) 373–390. (Available on Blackboard)
Additional reading:
Klare, Michael. Resource Wars. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2001.
Palazuelos, Enrique. "Current oil (dis) order: players, scenarios, and mechanisms."
Review of International Studies 38, no. 02 (2012): 301-319.
Andreas Goldthau and Jan Martin Witte. (2009) Global Energy Governance: The
New Rules of the Game; Brookings Institution 2009. (E-book) (Chapter 16)
Paskal, Cleo. "From constants to variables: how environmental change alters the
geopolitical and geo‐economic equation." International Affairs 85, no. 6 (2009):
1143-1156.
Pant, Girijesh. "The Future of Energy Security through a Global Restructuring." South
Asian Survey 17, no. 1 (2010): 31-43.
13
Ekins, Paul, Mike Bradshaw, and Jim Watson, eds. Global Energy: Issues, Potentials,
and Policy Implications. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.
Peak debates:
Chapter 10: Global Resource Scramble and New Energy Frontiers (pages 159–175)
by Øystein Noreng in Goldthau, Andreas, ed. The handbook of global energy policy.
John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-book: Core]
Gavin Bridge (2010) ‘Past Peak Oil: Political Economy of Energy Crises’ in Global
Political Ecology (eds.) R. Peet, P. Robbins, and M. Watts. Routledge, London.
Chapter 11: ‘Mineral Depletion and Peak Production’ by Magnus Ericsson and Patrik
Söderholm in Dannreuther, Roland, and Wojciech Ostrowski, eds. Global resources:
conflict and cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. [E-book: Core]
Ann Florini, Benjamin K. Sovacool (2009) ‘Who governs energy? The challenges
facing global energy governance’, Energy Policy, Volume 37, Issue 12, Pages 5239–
5248.
Downie, Christian. "Global energy governance: do the BRICs have the energy to
drive reform?." International Affairs 91, no. 4 (2015): 799-812.
Chapter 12: The “Gs” and the Future of Energy Governance in a Multipolar World
(pages 190–204)by Charles Ebinger and Govinda Avasarala in Goldthau, Andreas, ed.
The handbook of global energy policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-book: Core]
Van de Graaf, Thijs. The politics and institutions of global energy Governance.
Palgrave macmillan, 2013.
Thijs Van de Graaf, Dries Lesage (2009) ‘The International Energy Agency after 35
years: Reform needs and institutional adaptability’, The Review of International
Organizations, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 293-317.
14
Gately, Dermot. "A ten-year retrospective: OPEC and the world oil market." Journal
of Economic Literature (1984): 1100-1114.
Luke, Timothy W. "Dependent development and the Arab OPEC states." The Journal
of Politics 45, no. 04 (1983): 979-1003.
Kaufmann, Robert K., Stephane Dees, Pavlos Karadeloglou, and Marcelo Sanchez.
"Does OPEC matter? An econometric analysis of oil prices." The Energy Journal
(2004): 67-90.
Woolsey, R. James, and Anne Korin. "How to Break Both Oil's Monopoly and
OPEC's Cartel." innovations 3, no. 4 (2008): 35-38.
Alhajji, A. Fayçal, and David Huettner. "OPEC and other commodity cartels: a
comparison." Energy Policy 28, no. 15 (2000): 1151-1164.
Malnes, Raino. "OPEC and the Problem of Collective Action." Journal of Peace
Research 20, no. 4 (1983): 343-355.
Alhajji, Anas F., and David Huettner. "OPEC and world crude oil markets from 1973
to 1994: cartel, oligopoly, or competitive?." The Energy Journal (2000): 31-60.
Bina, Cyrus, and Minh Vo. "OPEC in the epoch of globalization: An event study of
global oil prices." Global Economy Journal 7, no. 1 (2007)
Nakov, Anton, and Galo Nuño. "Saudi Arabia and the oil market." The Economic
Journal 123, no. 573 (2013): 1333-1362.
Hansen, Petter Vegard, and Lars Lindholt. "The market power of OPEC 1973–2001."
Applied Economics 40, no. 22 (2008): 2939-2959.
Further reading:
Andreas Goldthau and Jan Martin Witte. (2009) Global Energy Governance: The
New Rules of the Game; Brookings Institution 2009. (Chapters 1, 2,12, 13) [E-book]
Helm, Dieter. The new energy paradigm. Oxford University Press, 2007.
15
Klare, Michael. Resource Wars. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2001.
Klare, Michael. Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America’s
Growing Dependency on Imported Petroleum. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004.
Klare, Michael and Volman, Daniel 'The African 'oil rush' and US national security',
Third World Quarterly, 27: 4, 609-628, 2006.
Klare, Michael. Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy.
New York: Henry Holt and Company. 2008.
Alex Callinicos (2005) ‘Iraq: Fulcrum of World Politics’, Third World Quarterly,
26:4-5, 593-608.
Daniel Yergin. (2011) The Quest: Energy, Security and the Remaking of the Modern
World , Allen Lane. (Chapters 7, 11, 14)
Roberts, Paul. The End of Oil: The Decline of the Petroleum Economy and the Rise of
a New Energy Order. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2005. (Chapters 10; 11)
Noreng, Oystein. Crude Power: Politics and the Oil Market. London: I.B. Tauris,
2002. (Chapter 2).
Francisco R. Parra. Oil Politics: A Modern History of Petroleum. I. B. Tauris, 2009.
(Chapter 15).
Simon Bromley. ‘The United States and the Control of World Oil.’ Government and
Opposition, 2005.
Edward Nell and Willi Semmler ‘The Iraq War and the World Oil Economy.’
Constellations Volume 14, No 4, 2007.
16
Week 4 (16 October)
Energy Markets
Seminar reading:
Goldthau, A. (2012) From the State to the Market and Back: Policy Implications of
Changing Energy Paradigms. Global Policy Volume 3 Issue 2 (Available on
Blackboard)
Ladislaw, S. (2019) Markets, Mercantilism and Mandates: The Future of the Global
Energy System in ‘Home and Abroad: Building US Global Economic Leadership on
Strong Domestic Foundation’. Washington. Center for Strategic & International
Studies (Available on Blackboard)
Chapter 3: ‘History of the Gas Industry’ by Chris Cragg in Dannreuther, Roland, and
Wojciech Ostrowski, eds. Global resources: conflict and cooperation. Palgrave
Macmillan, 2013. [E-book: Core] (Available on Blackboard)
Energy markets:
Chapter 5: The Oil Market: Context, Selected Features, and Implications (pages 81–
97)by Christopher Allsopp and Bassam Fattouh in Goldthau, Andreas, ed. The
handbook of global energy policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-book: Core]
Chapter 6: Natural Gas Going Global? Potential and Pitfalls (pages 98–112) by
Matthew Hulbert and Andreas Goldthau in Goldthau, Andreas, ed. The handbook of
global energy policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-book: Core]
Chapter 11: Cooperation and Conflict in Oil and Gas Markets (pages 176–189)by Dag
Harald Claes in Goldthau, Andreas, ed. The handbook of global energy policy. John
Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-book: Core]
17
Additional reading:
Rosecrance, R. (1986) The Rise of the Trading State. Commerce and Conquest in the
Modern World. New York, Basic Books.
Andersen, S.S, Goldthau, A., Sitter, N., (2017) (eds.) Energy Union: Europe's New
Liberal Mercantilism? London. Palgrave MacMillan.
Gourevitch, P.A. (1978a). The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of
Domestic Politics. International Organization 32(4):881-912.
Bielecki, J. (2002). Energy security: Is the wolf at the door? The Quarterly Review of
Economics and Finance, 42:235-250.
Cherp, A. and Jewell, J. (2014). The concept of energy security. Beyond the four As.
Energy Policy 75:415-421.
Kruyt, B, van Vuuren D.P. de Vries, H.J.M and Groenenberg, H. (2009) Indicators
for energy security. Energy Policy 37:2166-2181.
18
Week 5 (23 October)
Seminar questions:
How have the shifts in the global political economy shaped our understanding
of energy security?
How does the global energy system entrench and sustain energy poverty?
Seminar reading:
Additional reading:
Aleh Cherp, Jessica Jewell (2011) ‘The three perspectives on energy security:
intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration’, Current
Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Volume 3, Issue 4, September 2011, Pages
202–212.
Wolf, Reinhard. "Why wealthy countries must not drop nuclear energy: coal power,
climate change and the fate of the global poor." International Affairs 91, no. 2 (2015):
287-301.
19
Jeff D. Colgan, ‘Oil and Revolutionary Governments: Fuel for International Conflict’,
International Organization / Volume 64 / Issue 04 / October 2010, pp 661-694.
Schwarz, Rolf, and Miguel de Corral. "Not a Curse at All: Why Middle Eastern Oil
States Fail and How it can be Prevented." Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 7,
no. 3 (2013): 402-422
State Capitalism:
Overbeek, Henk, and Bastiaan van Apeldoorn, eds. Neoliberalism in crisis. Palgrave
Macmillan, 2012.
Ian Bremmer (2009) ‘State Capitalism Comes of Age. The End of the Free Market?’
Foreign Affairs, May/June 2009.
Cohen, Benjamin J. "Sovereign wealth funds and national security: the Great
Tradeoff." International Affairs 85, no. 4 (2009): 713-731.
Further reading:
Andreas Goldthau and Jan Martin Witte. (2009) Global Energy Governance: The
New Rules of the Game; Brookings Institution 2009. (Chapter 15) (E-book)
Daniel Yergin. (2011) The Quest: Energy, Security and the Remaking of the Modern
World , Allen Lane (Chapter 13).
Michael L. Ross, ‘Blood Barrels: Why Oil Wealth Fuels Conflict’. Foreign Affairs,
May/June 2008. (Available on Blackboard)
Noreng, Oystein. Crude Power: Politics and the Oil Market. London: I.B. Tauris,
2002. (Chapter 1)
20
Roberts, Paul. The End of Oil: The Decline of the Petroleum Economy and the Rise
of a New Energy Order. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2005. (Chapter 1)
Sovacool, Benjamin K., Christopher Cooper, Morgan Bazilian, Katie Johnson, David
Zoppo, Shannon Clarke, Jay Eidsness, Meredith Crafton, Thiyagarajan Velumail, and
Hilal A. Raza. "What moves and works: Broadening the consideration of energy
poverty." Energy Policy 42 (2012): 715-719.
Birol, Fatih. "Energy economics: a place for energy poverty in the agenda?." The
Energy Journal (2007): 1-6.
Sagar, Ambuj D. "Alleviating energy poverty for the world's poor." Energy Policy 33,
no. 11 (2005): 1367-1372.
21
Week 6 (30 October)
Essay Development
Seminar questions:
In what ways did the state-formation of the oil-states in the Middle East differ
from the European experience?
Rolf Schwarz (2008) ‘The Political Economy of State-Formation in the Arab Middle
East: Rentier States, Economic Reform, and Democratization’, Review of
International Political Economy, 15:4, 599-621. (Available on Blackboard)
Macartan Humphreys, Jeffrey D. Sachs, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. ‘What Is the Problem
with Natural Resource Wealth?’, Escaping the Resource Curse. In Macartan
Humphreys, Jeffrey D. Sachs, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. New York: Columbia University
Press, 2007. (Available on Blackboard)
Benner, Thorsten; Soares de Oliveira, Ricardo with Kalinke, Frederic. (2010) ‘The
Good/Bad Nexus in Global Energy Governance.’ In Andreas Goldthau and Jan
Martin Witte, Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game, Washington,
DC: Brookings Institution Press. [E-Book: Core] (Available on Blackboard)
Susan Ariel (2011) ‘Limited Partnership: Business, Government, Civil Society, and
the Public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)’, Public
Administration and Development, 31 (1): 50–63. (Available on Blackboard)
James Van Alstine (2014) ‘Transparency in Resource Governance: The Pitfalls and
Potential of “New Oil” in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Global Environmental Politics,
Volume 14, Number 1, pp. 20-39. (Available on Blackboard)
22
Political Economy of Energy
Additional reading:
Chapter 15: Resource Governance (pages 244–264) by Andrew Bauer and Juan
Carlos Quiroz in Goldthau, Andreas, ed. The handbook of global energy policy. John
Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-book: Core]
Ross, Michael. ‘Does Oil Hinder Democracy?’ World Politics, Volume 53, Number
3, April 2001, pp. 325-361.
Martin Beck and Simone Hüser (2012) ‘Political Change in the Middle East: An
Attempt to Analyze the “Arab Spring”’, GIGA Working Papers (203). (Available on
Blackboard)
Karen Barkey and Sunita Parikh (1991) ‘Comparative Perspectives on the State.’
Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 17, pp. 523-549.
Further reading:
Michael L. Ross. The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of
Nations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
Thane Gustafson. Wheel of Fortune: The Battle for Oil and Power in Russia, Harvard:
Harvard University Press, 2012.
Steffen Hertog. Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats: Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia,
Cornell: Cornell University Press, 2011.
Ricardo Soares de Oliveira. Magnificent and Beggar Land: Angola Since the Civil
War, London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd, 2015.
Miguel Tinker Salas, The Enduring Legacy: Oil, Culture, and Society in Venezuela,
Duke: Duke University Press, 2009.
Daniel Yergin. (2011) The Quest: Energy, Security and the Remaking of the Modern
World , Allen Lane. (Chapter 5).
23
Gwenn Okruhlik. ‘Rentier Wealth, Unruly Law, and the Rise of Opposition: The
Political Economy of Oil States.’ Comparative Politics, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Apr., 1999),
pp. 295-315. (Available on Blackboard)
Anderson, Lisa. 1987. ‘The State in the Middle East and North Africa.’ Comparative
Politics, 20 (1): October, pp. 1–18.
Ayubi, Nazih. 2001. Over-Stating the Arab State. Politics and Society in Middle East.
London: I.B. Tauris Publishers.
Brynen, Rex. 1992. ‘Economic Crisis and Post-Rentier Democratization in the Arab
World: The Case of Jordan.’ Canadian Journal of Political Science, 25 (1): March,
pp. 69–97
Clark, John. 1997. ‘Petro-Politics in Congo.’ Journal of Democracy, 8 (3), pp. 62–76.
(Available on Blackboard)
Crystal, Jill. 1990. Oil and Politics in the Gulf. Rulers and Merchants in Kuwait and
Qatar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Chapters 1, 2)
Karl, Terry L. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty. Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley:
University Of California Press. (Chapters 1, 4, 9)
Ross, Michael . 1999. ‘The Political Economy of the Resource Curse,’ World Politics
51 (2, January), 297-322.
Skocpol, Theda. 1982. ‘Rentier State and Shi’a Islam in the Iranian Revolution.’
Theory and Society, 11 May, pp. 293–300.
Smith, Benjamin. 2004. ‘Oil Wealth and Regime Survival in the Developing World,
1960-1999.’ American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 2 (Apr., 2004), pp.
232-246.
Soares de Oliveira, Ricardo. 2007. Oil and Politics in the Gulf of Guinea. New York:
Columbia University Press. (Chapters 1, 2, 3)
24
Yates, Douglas. 1996. The Rentier State in Africa. Oil Rent Dependency and
Neocolonialism in the Republic of Gabon. Trenton: Africa World Press, Inc.
(Chapters 1, 6)
Shaxson, Nicholas. 2007. Poisoned Wells: The Dirty Politics of African Oil. London:
Palgrave.
Luc Désiré Omgba. ‘On the Duration of Political Power in Africa: The Role of Oil
Rents.’ Comparative Political Studies, Volume 42 Number 3 March 2009 416-436.
Homa Katouzian. Iran in the 21st Century: Politics, Economics and Conflict. London:
Routledge, 2007.
Doug Stokes and Sam Raphael. (2010) Global Energy Security and American
Hegemony (Themes in Global Social Change), The Johns Hopkins University Press,
2010. (Chapters 5, 6)
Transparency
Additional reading:
Alexandra Gillies (2010) ‘Reputational Concerns and the Emergence of Oil Sector
Transparency as an International Norm’, International Studies Quarterly, Volume
54, Issue 1, pages 103–126, March.
Terry Lynn Karl. ‘Ensuring Fairness: The Case for a Transparent Fiscal Social
Contract.’ in ‘Escaping the Resource Curse’ Edited by Macartan Humphreys, Jeffrey
D. Sachs, and Joseph E. Stiglitz New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
Further reading:
Jedrzej George Frynas. ‘Corporate social responsibility in the oil and gas sector.’
Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 2009, Vol. 2, No. 3.
25
Emma Gilberthorpe and Gavin Hilson, Natural Resource Extraction and Indigenous,
London: Ashgate 2013.
Erika Weinthal and Pauline Jones Luong. ‘Combating the Resource Curse: An
Alternative Solution to Managing Mineral Wealth.’ Perspectives on Politics, March
2006 , Vol. 4/No. 1.
Robert Ebel (ed.), Caspian Oil Windfalls: Who Will Benefit? Caspian Revenues
Watch: Open Society Institute – Central Eurasia Project, 2003.
‘Escaping the Resource Curse’ Edited by Macartan Humphreys, Jeffrey D. Sachs, and
Joseph E. Stiglitz New York: Columbia University Press, 2007. (Chapters 9, 11, 12)
Mary Kaldon, Terr Lynn Karl and Yahia Said (ed.), Oil Wars. London: Pluto Press.
(Conclusion)
Andrew Rosser. ‘Escaping the Resource Curse: The Case of Indonesia.’ Journal of
Contemporary Asia; Feb 2007; 37, 1.
‘Legal Remedies for the Resource Curse’. A Open Society Foundations, 2005.
Collier, Paul, The Bottom Billion. Oxford University Press, 2007. (Chapters 3, 4)
Global Witness, ‘Time for Transparency. Coming clean on oil, mining and gas
revenues.’ 2004.
A CAFOD briefing. ‘The rough guide to transparency and natural resource revenues’.
Jamali, Dima, and Yusuf Sidani, eds. CSR in the Middle East: Fresh perspectives.
Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
26
Week 8 (13 November)
Seminar questions:
Seminar reading:
Stevens, P., 2016. International oil companies: The death of the old business model.
Chatham House The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/international-oil-companies-death-old-
business-model%20
Chapter 9:’National Oil Companies: Ensuring Benefits and Avoiding Systemic Risks
(pages 146–155) by Charles McPherson in Goldthau, Andreas, ed. The handbook of
global energy policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-book: Core] (Available on
Blackboard)
Chapter 1: ‘Introduction and overview’ in Victor, David G., David R. Hults, and
Mark C. Thurber, eds. Oil and governance: state-owned enterprises and the world
energy supply. Cambridge University Press, 2011. [E-book: Core] (Available on
Blackboard)
Additional reading:
27
Chapter 8: ‘Sector Legal Frameworks and Resource Property Rights’by Evelyn
Dietsche in Dannreuther, Roland, and Wojciech Ostrowski, eds. Global resources:
conflict and cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. [E-book: Core)
Paul Stevens. ‘National oil companies and international oil companies in the Middle
East: Under the shadow of government and the resource nationalism cycle.’ Journal
of World Energy Law & Business, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Andrea Goldstein. (2009) ‘New Multinationals from Emerging Asia: The Case of
National Oil Companies.’ Asian Development Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 26–56.
Carola Hoyos, ‘The New Seven Sisters: Oil and Gas Giants Dwarf Western Rivals’.
FT.com, March 2007.
Further reading:
Mazaheri, Nimah. "Oil Wealth, Colonial Legacies, and the Challenges of Economic
Liberalization." Political Research Quarterly (2014).
Marcel, Valerie. Oil Titans: National Oil Companies in the Middle East. London:
Chatham House, 2006. (Chapters 1, 2)
Silverstein, Ken. ‘Invisible Hands: The Secret World of the Oil Fixer’. Harpers
Magazine, 2009.
James Ferguson. ‘Seeing Like an Oil Company: Space, Security, and Global Capital
in Neoliberal Africa.’ American Anthropologist, Vol. 107, Issue 3, pp. 377–382.
Shaxson, Nicholas. ‘New approaches to volatility: dealing with the ‘resource curse’ in
sub-Saharan Africa.’ International Affairs 81, 2, 2005.
Andreas Goldthau and Jan Martin Witte. (2009) Global Energy Governance: The
New Rules of the Game; Brookings Institution 2009. (Chapter 6) (E-book)
Ian Bremmer; Robert Johnston. ‘The Rise and Fall of Resource Nationalism’.
Survival, vol. 51 no. 2, April–May 2009. pp. 149–158.
28
Donald L. Losman. ‘The Rentier State and National Oil Companies: An Economic
And Political Perspective.’ MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL, Volume 64, No. 3, summer
2010.
Shaxson, Nicholas. Poisoned Wells: The Dirty Politics of African Oil. London:
Palgrave, 2007. (Chapters 4, 5)
Soares de Oliveira, Ricardo. Oil and Politics in the Gulf of Guinea. New York:
Columbia. University Press, 2007. (Chapters 3, 4, 5)
Paul Stevens. ‘The Coming Oil Supply Crunch.’ A Chatham House Report, 2009.
‘Escaping the Resource Curse’ Edited by Macartan Humphreys, Jeffrey D. Sachs, and
Joseph E. Stiglitz New York: Columbia University Press, 2007. (Chapters 3, 4)
Noreng, Oystein. Crude Power: Politics and the Oil Market. London: I.B. Tauris,
2002. (Chapter 3)
Bridge, G. 2008. ‘Global Production Networks and the Extractive Sector: governing
resource-based development’, Journal of Economic Geography 8 (3) March.
(Available on Blackboard)
Read, Colin. BP and the Macondo spill: the complete story. Palgrave Macmillan,
2011.
Fox, Loren. Enron: The rise and fall. John Wiley and Sons, 2003.
29
Week 9 (20 November)
Sustainable Development
Seminar questions:
‘Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their own needs.’ Is the 1980s definition
of sustainable development still relevant today?
‘Vested interests actively hamper the rise of the renewable industry.’ Do you
agree with this claim?
Seminar reading:
Gough, Ian (2015) ‘Welfare states and environmental states: a comparative analysis.’
Environmental Politics. pp. 1-24. (Available on Blackboard)
Moe, Espen. "Energy, industry and politics: Energy, vested interests, and long-term
economic growth and development." Energy 35, no. 4 (2010): 1730-1740. (Available
on Blackboard)
Additional reading:
Gunderson, Ryan. "Environmental sociology and the Frankfurt School 1: reason and
capital." Environmental Sociology 1, no. 3 (2015): 224-235.
Further reading:
Helm, Dieter. The new energy paradigm. Oxford University Press, 2007.
30
MacKay, David. Sustainable Energy-without the hot air. UIT Cambridge, 2008.
Renewables:
Moe, Espen. "Vested interests, energy efficiency and renewables in Japan." Energy
Policy 40 (2012): 260-273.
Liu, Li-qun, Chun-xia Liu, and Jing-si Wang. "Deliberating on renewable and
sustainable energy policies in China." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 17
(2013): 191-198.
Ball, Jeffrey. "Tough Love for Renewable Energy." Foreign Affairs 91, no. 3 (2012):
122-133.
Hofman, Daan M., and Ronald Huisman. "Did the financial crisis lead to changes in
private equity investor preferences regarding renewable energy and climate
policies?." Energy Policy 47 (2012): 111-116.
Marques, António Cardoso, and José Alberto Fuinhas. "Is renewable energy effective
in promoting growth?." Energy Policy 46 (2012): 434-442.
31
Hirschl, Bernd. "International renewable energy policy—between marginalization and
initial approaches." Energy Policy 37, no. 11 (2009): 4407-4416.
Boisvert, Will. "Green energy bust in Germany." Dissent 60, no. 3 (2013): 62-70.
Toke, David, Fionnguala Sherry; Brennan, Richard Cowell, Geraint Ellis, and Peter
Strachan. "Scotland, renewable energy and the independence debate: will head or
heart rule the roost?." The Political Quarterly 84, no. 1 (2013): 61-70.
Carafa, L. "Policy and Markets in the MENA: The Nexus between Governance and
Renewable Energy Finance." Energy Procedia 69 (2015): 1696-1703.
Zhang, Xiliang, Shiyan Chang, and Martinot Eric. "Renewable energy in China: An
integrated technology and policy perspective." Energy Policy 51 (2012): 1-6.
Wang, Feng, Haitao Yin, and Shoude Li. "China’s renewable energy policy:
commitments and challenges." Energy Policy 38, no. 4 (2010): 1872-1878.
Tews, Kerstin. "Europeanization of Energy and Climate Policy The Struggle Between
Competing Ideas of Coordinating Energy Transitions." The Journal of Environment &
Development (2015).
Lauber, Volkmar, and Elisa Schenner. "The struggle over support schemes for
renewable electricity in the European Union: a discursive-institutionalist analysis."
Environmental politics 20, no. 4 (2011): 508-527.
Jacobsen, Henrik Klinge, Lise Lotte Pade, Sascha Thorsten Schröder, and Lena
Kitzing. "Cooperation mechanisms to achieve EU renewable targets." Renewable
Energy 63 (2014): 345-352.
32
Kitzing, Lena, Catherine Mitchell, and Poul Erik Morthorst. "Renewable energy
policies in Europe: Converging or diverging?." Energy Policy 51 (2012): 192-201.
West, J., I. Bailey, and M. Winter. "Renewable energy policy and public perceptions
of renewable energy: A cultural theory approach." Energy Policy 38, no. 10 (2010):
5739-5748.
Delmas, Magali A., and Maria J. Montes-Sancho. "US state policies for renewable
energy: Context and effectiveness." Energy Policy 39, no. 5 (2011): 2273-2288.
Yi, Hongtao, and Richard C. Feiock. "Renewable energy politics: policy typologies,
policy tools, and state deployment of renewables." Policy Studies Journal 42, no. 3
(2014): 391-415.
Bardi, Ugo. "The grand challenge of the energy transition." Frontiers in Energy
Research 1 (2013): 2.
Leal-Arcas, Rafael, Juan Alemany Ríos, and Costantino Grasso. "The European
Union and its energy security challenges: engagement through and with networks."
Contemporary Politics 21, no. 3 (2015): 273-293.
33
Nuclear energy:
Nayan, Rajiv. "The Global Quest for Nuclear Energy: Opportunity, Constraints and
Prospects." Strategic Analysis 34, no. 6 (2010): 812-817.
Sovacool, Benjamin K., and Scott Victor Valentine. "The socio-political economy of
nuclear energy in China and India." Energy 35, no. 9 (2010).
Tanter, Richard. "After Fukushima: a survey of corruption in the global nuclear power
industry." Asian Perspective 37, no. 4 (2013): 475-500.
Koerner, Cassandra L. "Media, fear, and nuclear energy: A case study." The Social
Science Journal 51, no. 2 (2014): 240-249.
Nuclear or Not?: Does Nuclear Power Have a Place in a Sustainable Energy Future?
(Energy, Climate and the Environment) 2010 by David Elliott.
Thomas C. Hoerber. The Origins of Energy and Environmental Policy in Europe: The
Beginnings of a European Environmental Conscience, London: Routledge, 2014.
Nuclear security:
Gartzke, Erik, Jeffrey M. Kaplow, and Rupal N. Mehta. "The determinants of nuclear
force structure." Journal of Conflict Resolution 58, no. 3 (2014): 481-508.
Narang, Vipin. "What does it take to deter? Regional power nuclear postures and
international conflict." Journal of Conflict Resolution 57, no. 3 (2013): 478-508.
Cravens, Gwyneth. "Terrorism and nuclear energy: understanding the risks." The
Brookings Review 20, no. 2 (2002): 40.
34
Week 10 (27 November)
Seminar readings:
‘Setting the Stage for the Energy Transition’ Vincent Lagendijk and Geert Verbong in
Governing the Energy Transition, Reality, Illusion or Necessity? Edited by Geert
Verbong, Derk Loorbach Routledge 2012 [E-book]
Unruh, G.C. (2000) ‘Understanding carbon lock-in.’ Energy Policy 28: 817-830.
(Available on Blackboard)
Heiskanen, E., Johnson, M., Robinson, S., Vadovics, E. and Saastamoinen, M. (2010)
Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change. Energy
Policy, 38, 7586–7595.
Lockwood, M., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C. and Hoggett, R., 2017. Historical
institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda.
Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(2), pp.312-333.
Lockwood, M., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C. and Hoggett, R., 2013. Theorising
governance and innovation in sustainable energy transitions. University of Exeter.
Unruh, G.C. (2000) ‘Understanding carbon lock-in.’ Energy Policy 28: 817-830.
Kuzemko, C., Lawrence, A. and Watson, M., 2019. New directions in the
international political economy of energy. Review of International Political Economy,
26(1), pp.1-24.
35
Tynkkynen, V.P., Balmaceda, M., Högselius, P., Johnson, C., Pleines, H. and Rogers,
D., 2019. Energy materiality: A conceptual review of multi-disciplinary approaches.
Energy Research & Social Science, 56.
Newell, Peter, and Dustin Mulvaney. "The political economy of the ‘just transition’."
The Geographical Journal 179, no. 2 (2013): 132-140. (Available on Blackboard)
Circular Economy:
Allwood, J.M. (2014). Squaring the circular economy: The role of recycling within a
hierarchy of material management strategies. Handbook of Recycling. Chapter 30,
445-477.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013a). Towards the circular economy: Economic and
business rationale for an accelerated transition, Vol. 1.
European Commission. (2015). Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular
Economy. (COM(2015) 614).
Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Heinz, M. (2015). How circular is the
global economy?: an assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in
the European union and the world in 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 765-
777.
O'Brien, M., Miedzinski, M., Giljum, S., & Doranova, A. (2014). Eco-Innovation:
Enabling the transition to a resource-efficient circular economy. Annual Report 2
36
Week 11 (4 December)
Seminar questions:
Why did the decision-making framework which had developed over two
decades of sustained international negotiations not yield the desired outcomes
during the Copenhagen summit in 2009?
The power of emerging developing states render the reliance on the idea of the
North/South divide largely redundant in the current climate change
negotiations. Discuss.
Seminar reading:
Chapter 15: ‘The Nation-State, International Society, and the Global Environment’ by
Robert Falkner in Falkner, Robert. The handbook of global climate and environment
policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-Book: Core] (Available on Blackboard)
Falkner, Robert, Hannes Stephan, and John Vogler. "International climate policy after
Copenhagen: Towards a ‘building blocks’ approach." Global Policy 1, no. 3 (2010):
252-262. (Available on Blackboard)
Falkner, R., 2016. The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate
politics. International Affairs, 92(5), pp.1107-1125. (Available on Blackboard)
Additional reading:
37
Chapter 20: ‘International Negotiations’ by Radoslav S. Dimitrov in Falkner, Robert.
The handbook of global climate and environment policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[E-Book: Core]
Bailey, Ian, and Hugh Compston, eds. Feeling the heat: The politics of climate policy
in rapidly industrializing countries. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. [E-Book]
Further reading:
Helm, Dieter. The new energy paradigm. Oxford University Press, 2007.
Chapter 19: ‘Strengthening the United Nations’ by Steffen Bauer in Falkner, Robert.
The handbook of global climate and environment policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[E-Book: Core]
Chapter 12: ‘Green Growth’ by Michael Jacobs in Falkner, Robert. The handbook of
global climate and environment policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-Book: Core]
Bamidele, Oluwaseun. "Climate Change, War, and Global Struggle." Peace Review
25, no. 4 (2013): 510-517.
Chapter 10: ‘Global Environmental Security’ by Simon Dalby in Falkner, Robert. The
handbook of global climate and environment policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-
Book: Core]
Barnett, Jon, and W. Neil Adger. "Climate change, human security and violent
conflict." Political geography 26, no. 6 (2007): 639-655.
38
Knight, Tamela. "Climate change and violent conflicts." Peace Review 25, no. 1
(2013): 83-88.
Trombetta, Maria Julia. "Environmental security and climate change: analysing the
discourse." Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21, no. 4 (2008): 585-602.
Gautam, P. K. "Climate change and conflict in South Asia." Strategic Analysis 36, no.
1 (2012): 32-40.
Briggs, Chad Michael. "Climate security, risk assessment and military planning."
International affairs 88, no. 5 (2012): 1049-1064.
Davis, Carmel. "Climate change and civil war." African Security Review 19, no. 1
(2010): 64-72.
John Urry ‘The Problem of Energy’ Theory, Culture & Society, September 2014 31:
3-20, first published on July 1, 2014
Tyfield, David. "‘King Coal is Dead! Long Live the King!’: The Paradoxes of Coal's
Resurgence in the Emergence of Global Low-Carbon Societies." Theory, Culture &
Society (2014): 0263276414537910.
Martin, Richard. Coal Wars: The Future of Energy and the Fate of the Planet.
Macmillan, 2015.
39
Week 12 (11 December)
Seminar questions:
Are politicians addressing the issue with the speed that the science mandates?
Seminar reading:
Benson, Melinda Harm, and Robin Kundis Craig. "The end of sustainability." Society
& Natural Resources 27, no. 7 (2014): 777-782. (Available on Blackboard)
Dryzek, John S., and Alex Y. Lo. "Reason and rhetoric in climate communication."
Environmental Politics 24, no. 1 (2015): 1-16. (Available on Blackboard)
Chapter 14: ‘Climate Change Justice’ by Edward Page in Falkner, Robert. The
handbook of global climate and environment policy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [E-
Book: Core] (Available on Blackboard)
Additional reading:
Energy and Ethics: Justice and the Global Energy Challenge. Palgrave 2013
Nuclear or Not?: Does Nuclear Power Have a Place in a Sustainable Energy Future?
(Energy, Climate and the Environment) 2010 by David Elliott.
Aleh Cherp, Jessica Jewell, Andreas Goldthau, ‘Governing Global Energy: Systems,
Transitions, Complexity’, Global Policy, Volume 2, Issue 1, January 2011.
Neil Hirst and Antony Froggatt, ‘The Reform of Global Energy Governance’
Grantham Discussion Paper, December 2012.
Jeffrey Mazo, ‘Who Owns the North Pole?,’ Survival, Volume 56, Issue 1, 2014.
40
Jeffrey Mazo, ‘Climate Change: Strategies of Denial’, Survival, Volume 55, Issue 4,
2013.
Shiloh Fetzek & Jeffrey Mazo (2014) ‘Climate, Scarcity and Conflict’, Survival, 56:5,
143-170.
Antony Froggatt and Michael A. Levi (2009) ‘Climate and energy security policies
and measures: synergies and conflicts.’ International Affairs, Volume 85, Issue
6, pages 1129–1141, November. (Available on Blackboard)
Gibbs, D., Jonas, A. and While, A., 2002. ‘Changing governance structures and the
environment: economy–environment relations at the local and regional scales’.
Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 4(2), pp.123-138.
Herrschel, T., 2013. ‘Competitiveness and sustainability: can ‘smart city regionalism’
square the circle?’. Urban Studies, p.0042098013478240.
While, A., Jonas, A.E. and Gibbs, D., 2004. ‘The environment and the entrepreneurial
city: searching for the urban ‘sustainability; fix’in Manchester and Leeds’.
Zeemering, E.S., 2009. ‘What does sustainability mean to city officials?’. Urban
Affairs Review.
Matthew Lockwood (2018) Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda:
exploring the linkages, Environmental Politics, 27:4
McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2011. The politicization of climate change and
polarization in the American public’s view of global warming, 2001-2010.
Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194.
41
McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E., and Marquart-Pyatt, S.T., 2016. Political ideology and
views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25 (2),
338–358.
Sustainable Cities:
Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V. & Edwards, G.A.S. (2012). Bringing climate change
to the city: towards low carbon urbanism? Local Environment: The International
Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 17(5):545–551. (Available on Blackboard)
Joss, S., Cowley, R. & Tomozeiu, D. (2013). Towards the ‘ubiquitous eco-city’: an
analysis of the internationalisation of eco-city policy and practice. Urban Research
and Practice, 6(1): 54–74. (Available on Blackboard)
Taylor, P.J. (2012). Transition towns and world cities: towards green networks of
cities. Local Environment, 17(4): 495–508.
Wheeler, S.M & Beatley, T. (eds.) (2014). The Sustainable Urban Development
Reader. London: Routledge.
42
Essay Due: 13/January/2020
13:00
43
PERIODICALS AND OTHER SOURCES:
Geopolitics
Environmental Politics
New Political Economy
Global Environmental Politics
Energy Policy
Foreign Affairs
Survival
International Affairs
Environmental Ethics
Journal of Political Ecology
Political Geography
The Washington Quarterly
International Organizations
Economy and Society
Journal of Peace Research
Third World Quarterly
Platts:
www.platts.com
Shell Scenarios:
www.shell.com/scenarios
44
http://www.acus.org/program/energy-and-environment
You can access Factiva via Library Search, the University’s resource discovery tool,
at www.westminster.ac.uk/librarysearch.
Factiva gives access to over 9,000 publications from around the world, in a range of
languages including major international newspapers, regional titles, journals, stock
market data and pictures.
Search for articles on your topic
45
The first screen you see is called the Search Builder. Type keywords or phrases for
your topic in the Free Text Search box. Then click on the blue Search button.
Free Text search will allow you to create more advanced searches using standard
principles of AND, OR and NOT. Using these principles to combine keywords can
produce more relevant results.
2. Limit the date range for your search. For a specific date range:
Click on the dropdown menu next to Date and select one of the pre-set date
ranges. Alternatively select Enter date range… in order to specify an exact
start and end date
Then proceed as normal with a Free Text search.
3. Select a single source to search. When you want articles from a single newspaper
or journal:
Click on Source, located in the left hand menu on the screen, and type the
name of the newspaper or journal in the Search Source Name box
Then click on the arrow to browse the titles available
Click on the title to add it to your search. You should now see the title you
have selected, highlighted in orange, next to Source
Repeat the last step to add another title to your search
Then proceed as normal with a Free Text search.
TIP: When you click on Source you will also see a list of Groups that have been set
up for you. These are pre-defined collections of titles eg. Group: Newspapers: UK
(top) is a collection of the top UK newspapers.
To browse the latest newspapers select the News Pages tab from the top of the screen.
To see the full contents click on the Group Pages tab. For each title you can use the
dropdown menus to select which section of the newspaper you wish to read. You can
select any date from a two week archive.
46
Select a language for your search
Factiva indexes a large number of publications that are not in English. Doing the
following will limit your search to the language, or languages of your choice.
Click on Language, located in the left hand menu on the screen, to see a list
of languages available
Click on a language to add it to your search. You should now see your
selection, highlighted in orange, next to Language
Then proceed as normal with a Free Text search.
TIP: More detailed help on features in Companies/Markets section can be found via
the Customer Service option in the Tools menu.
Once you have a list of results you can manage them in a number of ways. Scroll
down through the list of results and use the checkboxes to select those articles of
interest to you. Then use the icon to view just the selected articles.
Use to email your results. Use to format and print out your
results.
Use to format and save your results.
Click on the Customer Service option in the Tools menu. Next select the Learning
tab to display the wide range of online help available.
If carried out knowingly, cheating and plagiarism have the objectives of deceiving
examiners and gaining an unfair advantage over other students. This is unethical. It also
threatens the integrity of the assessment procedures and the value of the University’s
academic awards.
47
While you are studying here your academic performance will be assessed on the basis
of your own work. Anyone caught cheating in exams/in-class tests or through
coursework assignments will be subject to formal investigation in accordance with
Section 10 of the University Academic Regulations.
It is your responsibility to ensure that you are not vulnerable to any allegation that you
have breached the assessment regulations. Serious penalties are imposed on those
who cheat. These may include failure in a module or an element of a module,
suspension or exclusion from your course and withdrawal of academic credits
awarded previously for modules which have been passed.
Plagiarism
When you submit work for individual assessment, the work must be your own. If you
have included sections of text from other sources without referencing them correctly,
then you may be accused of plagiarism.
Plagiarism is defined as submission for assessment of material (written, visual or oral)
originally produced by another person or persons, without acknowledgement, in such
a way that the work could be assumed to be the student’s own.
Plagiarism may involve the unattributed use of another person’s work, including:
ideas, opinions, theory, facts, statistics, graphs, models, paintings, performance,
computer code, drawings, quotations of another person’s actual spoken or written
words, or paraphrases of another person’s spoken or written words.
Plagiarism covers both direct copying and copying or paraphrasing with only minor
adjustments. You must keep a careful record of all the sources you use, including all
internet material. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand correct
referencing practices.
If you use text or data or drawings or designs or artefacts without properly
acknowledging who produced the material, then you are likely to be accused of
plagiarism.
Here are some simple dos and don’ts, to help you avoid plagiarism:
Do Do not!
Include references to all Rely on citing sources in your
sources at the point where they bibliography without making clear
appear in your text, either via a where they appear in your text
direct reference or foot note
Always use quotation marks to Take parts of other people’s
indicate someone else’s ideas sentences and incorporate them into
your own writing without making
clear that they are not your own
words
Reference diagrams, tables and Assume that plagiarism only refers to
other forms of data written words in prose narrative
48
which make clear exactly expect your tutors to search for your
which page you referenced and source:
the date you accessed the
website. http://www.guardian.co.uk/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/edu
cation/2009/apr/18/university-
life-academic-cheating Date
accessed: 23/12/13
Students are also not permitted to re-present any assessment already submitted for one
module as if for the first time assessment in another module. Double counting of
assessed work is not normally allowed. If submitting work previously included in
another assessment the student should attribute the section of text from the earlier
work. This may be taken into account by the markers.
Always check with your Module Leader or Course Leader if you are unsure about
subject-specific conventions concerning referencing and attribution (eg in design-
based and creative subjects where there may be particular expectations about
referencing and/or copyright).
You can access a helpful tutorial about plagiarism in Blackboard. After signing in the
tutorial can be accessed from any page in Blackboard by clicking on the ‘Skills
Resources’ tab. Please consult the relevant Module Leader or your Course Leader if
you need any further advice.
Plagiarism Detection
To help eradicate plagiarism and thereby protect the value of your qualification all
modules include the requirement that your coursework must be submitted electronically
and checked by text-matching software. All coursework must be submitted via
Blackboard
Online feedback via GradeMark
The Department of Politics and International Relations offers online feedback on
written coursework via GradeMark (accessed via Blackboard).. Failure to submit your
essay via Blackboard will mean that your coursework will not be graded and
subsequently will not count towards your assessment for this module.
GradeMark gives academic staff a full-featured digital environment for grading and
commenting on student work. After grades are posted by the instructor, students can
access GradeMark to review comments and print or save a copy of the graded files.
Further information about GradeMark can be found online:
http://www.submit.ac.uk/resources/documentation/turnitin/sales/GradeMark_Overvie
w.pdf
Mitigating Circumstances
49
You will be offered an opportunity to sit the assessment without penalty at
the next available opportunity as a Deferral (in cases where you have
missed an assessment entirely).
The University operates a fit-to-sit policy for assessment. This means that if you
submit a piece of coursework or attend an exam or other time-limited assessment, you
are deemed to have declared yourself fit to attempt the assessment and must accept
the result of the assessment.
If you have missed a significant part of your studies due to ill health or other personal
problems, you must speak to your Course Leader and Personal Tutor, to discuss
whether you should suspend studies or request deferrals either for the individual
assessments, or entire modules.
If you are taken ill during an examination, you must notify the invigilator of the
reason for leaving the examination and you must go to your doctor, or an A&E unit
(in more serious cases), to obtain a diagnosis, which you will need when you submit
your MC claim.
If you miss an assessment or submit work late, you should submit an application in
writing using a Mitigating Circumstances claim form to your School Office,
supported by original documentary evidence (eg a medical certificate), at the earliest
available opportunity.
Mitigating Circumstances Boards meet throughout the year and it is in your best
interests to submit your claim as quickly as possible, normally within one month of
the circumstances occurring, as you will receive a decision on your claim much
earlier and will be in a better position to plan your studies for the remainder of the
year. Information about the final deadlines for claims is available via the
Mitigating Circumstances website: http://www.westminster.ac.uk/study/current-
students/your-studies/forms-and-procedures/mitigating-circumstances. Please note
that retrospective claims will not normally be considered, especially in cases where
the claim is being made after the release of the results for the assessment in question.
If you do submit an MC claim, you should not assume that it is necessarily going to
be accepted; it is your responsibility to make sure that you complete all assessment
requirements in a module as far as possible.
It is very important that you read Section 11 of the Handbook of Academic
Regulations, on Mitigating Circumstances, to find out what to do if you miss the
deadline for any piece of work; in most cases it is crucial that you submit the work or
participate in the assessment as soon as you possibly can. Late work will not normally
be accepted if it is received more than ten working days after the original coursework
deadline. If other students have already had their marked work returned, the same
assignment cannot be marked once submitted late.
Your MC claim will be considered by the Mitigating Circumstances Board. The
Mitigating Circumstances Board makes a decision on your claim that is later
communicated to the Assessment Board which meets at the end of the year to
formally ratify all of the results for your course.
The Mitigating Circumstances Board’s decision will be communicated to you by
email within 5 working days of the Board meeting and you will also be able to check
SRSWeb to see which deferrals you have been granted.
The University-wide criteria by which claims will be judged are standardised for
reasons of fairness and these are published in detail in Section 11 of the Handbook of
Academic Regulations, which you should read before submitting any claim. The
criteria for acceptance or rejection of an MC claim reflect work-based standards of
50
conduct and performance, and only those circumstances which are demonstrably
serious and likely to have affected your academic performance will be considered.
Penalties for late submission of coursework
The University operates a two-tier penalty system for late submission of coursework
and in-module assessment. This regulation applies to all students registered for an
award irrespective of their level of study. All University coursework deadlines are
scheduled between Monday and Thursday inclusive. Where possible, the submission
day will coincide with the day the module classes are normally taught. However, the
University does not allow submission deadlines to be set for Fridays.
If you submit your coursework late but within 24 hours or one working day of the
specified deadline, 10% of the overall marks available for that element of assessment
(ie 10%) will be deducted, as a penalty for late submission, except for work which
obtains a mark in the range 40 – 49%, in which case the mark will be capped at the
pass mark (40%).
If you submit your coursework more than 24 hours or more than one working day
after the specified deadline you will be given a mark of zero for the work in question.
Late work and any claim of Mitigating Circumstances relating to coursework must be
submitted at the earliest opportunity to ensure as far as possible that the work can still
be marked. You will normally have the right to submit coursework 10 working days
after the original deadline. Once the work of other students has been marked and
returned, late submissions of that same piece of work cannot be assessed.
Referral Opportunities
NB: It is your responsibility to contact the Module Leader to obtain details of the
referral coursework deadlines and requirements
51