Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is International Business? How Does It Differ From Domestic Business?
What Is International Business? How Does It Differ From Domestic Business?
Many well-known business units are highly successful in their home countries. However, they
are not able to face challenges abroad. On the other hand, there are organizations that do very
well in international business, but lose out in the local arena. There are a number of
organizations that do both domestic and international business successfully by properly
allocating the right resources in the right countries. These organizations are quick to see the
advantages and disadvantages involved in both operations. If business is slow in the home
country, they concentrate more on international business, and if the risk is high in international
business, they focus their attention on the domestic front. Understanding the differences and
deciding on policies and strategies enables organizations to succeed or fail.
There are certain similarities between domestic and international business in terms of broad
objectives and goals of the company, namely:
Some business groups like Adanis started overseas operations without any link to domestic
operations right from the beginning. The Tata Group established a good name in their home
country and gradually moved to other countries. For companies in IT space, such as Wipro or
Infosys, the major focus is on overseas operations. All the companies cited above are successful
in their own right, but the strategies and operation systems differ from country to country.
2. Discuss the prime motive behind companies and nations going in for
international business.
Ans :- REASONS TO ENTER INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
All organizations, irrespective of their size, are keen to enter into international business.
Established companies are expanding their business. Many countries encourage trade and the
removal of strangulating trade barriers. This motivates companies to aggressively multiply their
targets. The governments of various countries are also determined to make their economy
grow through international business that has become an inevitable part of their economic
policy. The objective behind international business can be looked at:
All companies have products that pass through different stages of their life
cycles. After the product reaches the last stage of the life cycle, called the
declining stage, in one country, it is important for the company to identify other
countries where the whole cycle process could be encashed. For example,
Enfield India reached maturity and the declining stage in India for the 350cc
Managing the
motorcycle. The company entered Kenya, the West Indies, Mauritius, and other
product life cycle
international destinations where the heavy-engine two-wheeler became
popular. The Suzuki 800cc vehicle reached the last stage of its life cycle in Japan
and entered India in the early 1980s, where it is still doing well to this day. HP
laptops are moving all the developing countries the moment they reached
maturity in the U.S. market.
Even if companies expand their business at home, they may still look overseas
for new markets and better prospects. For example, Arvind Mills expanded
Geographic expansion their business by either setting up units or opening warehouses abroad.
as a growth strategy Ranbaxy’s growth is mainly attributed to yearly geographic expansion to new
territories. Arabindo Pharma, Cipla, and Dr. Reddys follow the same pattern.
Companies that are involved in international business enjoy fiscal, physical, and
infrastructural incentives when setting up their business in a host country. The
Incentives and
Aditya Birla Group enjoyed such incentives in Thailand and Indonesia. All such
business impact
incentives contribute to the company so that it may enjoy multiple advantages,
such as economies of scale, access to import inputs, competitive pricing, and
aggressive promotion.
Many companies have a highly productive labour force. Their unique skills may
not be available throughout the world. Manufacturing units in India have
consistently performed well, whether in the diamond, handicraft, woodwork, or
leather industry. Companies nurture the skills of the artisans and win world
Labour advantage
markets. Knitwear, handlooms, embroidery, metal ware, carpet weaving,
cashew processing, and seafood call for a cost-effective labour force. India is
endowed with such skills.
Earning valuable Foreign exchange earning is necessary to balance the payments for
foreign exchange imports. India imports crude oil, defence equipment, essential raw
materials, and medical equipment, the payments for which must be made
in foreign exchange. If the exports are high and imports are low, this
indicates a surplus balance of payment. On the other hand, if imports are
high and exports are low, this indicates an adverse balance of payment,
which all economies would want to avoid. A vast majority of the nations in
the world are facing an adverse balance of payment
Interdependency of From time immemorial, nations have depended on each other. Even
nations during the era of the Indus valley civilization, Egypt and the Indus Valley
depended on each other for various items. Today, India depends on the
Gulf regions for crude oil and in turn, the Gulf region depends on India for
tea, rice, and other such commodities. Developed countries depend on
developing countries for primary goods, whereas developing countries
depend on developed countries for value-added finished products. No
single country is endowed with all the resources to survive on its own.
Trade theories and The theories of absolute advantage, comparative advantage, and
their impact competitive advantage, which have been propounded by classical
economists, indicate that a few nations have certain advantages with
respect to resources. The resources may be in the form of labour,
infrastructure, technology, or even a proactive government policy. Such
theories are remaining as foundations until today, for international
business practices with few changes and trends.
Diplomatic relations Diplomacy and trade always go hand in hand. Many sovereign nations
send their diplomatic representatives to other countries with the intent to
promote trade in addition to maintaining cordial relations. Indian
diplomats in Latin America have done a remarkable job of promoting
India’s business in the 1990s. Indian embassies and high commissions in
all countries around the world play a catalytic role of promoting trade and
investment.
Core competency of Many countries are endowed with resources, which are produced at an
nations optimum level. Such countries can compete well anywhere in the world.
Rubber products from Malaysia, knitwear from India, rice from Thailand,
and wool from Australia are a few examples. Competing with a focused
competency in any major resource or technology gives core competency
status. India’s core competency in IT is known throughout the world
Investment for Over the years, all countries have invested huge amounts of money on
infrastructure infrastructure by building airports, seaports, economic zones, and inland
container terminals. If the trade activities do not increase, the country
cannot recover the amounts invested. Hence, the government fixes
targets for every infrastructure unit, as well as a time frame to achieve it.
Economies like Mauritius, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malta, and Cyprus invest
in trade-related infrastructures in order to elevate themselves to be
foreign trade-oriented economies. Infrastructure and international
business are the two eyes of a growing economy.
National image A new era has emerged from conquering countries by sword to winning
them by trade. A businessman gives priority to the image of the country
he belongs to. We come across products with labels such as “Made in
China”, “Made in Japan”, and “Made in India”. Businessmen from India,
China, and Japan bring credentials to their country. When L.N. Mittal
operates in Indonesia, Kazakhstan, or Trinidad, he is perceived by the
people as Indian. The stigma cannot be detached.
All developing countries announce their trade policies. A clear road map is
drafted and given to promotional bodies so that timely implementation is
Foreign trade
possible. In the past, every trade policy in India had its agenda and action
policy and targets
plans, starting from the import control order in 1947. All the trade policies
had a threefold set of objectives in their agenda: production, promotion,
and competitiveness.
National targets By the year 2010, India aims to have a 2% share of the global market from
the current level of 1%. By the years 2009-2010, our trade status should
cross $500 billion.
WTO and international The apex body of world trade, the WTO, a free, transparent, and
agencies regulatory body, upholds provisions related to the elimination of tariffs
and non-tariff barriers. The International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (IBRD), popularly called the World Bank, extends financial
assistance on a soft loan basis in order to assist developing countries in
their infrastructure and industrial development. The International
Monetary Fund (IMF) maintains currency stability in various countries
through regulatory mechanisms. Many more organizations, such as the
International Maritime Organization, the International Standard
Organization, the International Telecommunication Union, and the
International Civil Aviation Organization are major catalysts to promoting
trade between nations. Over the past few years, their role in the
promotion of trade, especially amongst developing economies has been
unprecedented.
3. What is Multinational Corporation? Classify MNC’s depending upon their structure and
country of origin.
4. Discuss FDI and strategies to attract FDI from the investor’s point of view.
Investment is “the flow of funds from one destination to another” for any activity, including
industrial development, infrastructure, and manufacturing. When the investment goes from the
home country to another country, it is defined as ‘investment outflow’ and when foreign
investment comes in from other countries to the home country, it is termed ‘investment
inflow’. Both inward and outward movements are encouraged in the majority of countries
across the world.
All developing countries produce primary goods, and to exploit them, financial resources
are necessary. Developed countries are also in need of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) for
modernization and the further development of technology.
The current FDI is related to investment in developing countries, and Less Developed
Countries (LDCs) require huge investments in other activities, such as infrastructure, healthcare,
housing, and power generation.
With the liberalization of the Indian economy, a large Indian market is being opened up
to foreign investors. Essentially, FDI represents foreign assets in domestic structures,
equipments, and organizations. It does not include foreign investment in stock markets. Foreign
direct investment is useful to a country if the focus is more on projects rather than investments
in the equity of companies, because equity investments are potentially “hot money” that can
leave at the first sign of trouble. Crises in South Korea, South Africa, and Argentina were
partially due to such problems.
Marketing / services
The parent company maintains direct managerial control, but the degree of control may
depend on the type of country and company policy. Prior to their investment decisions, it is
necessary for a company to carry out a risk analysis. MNCs do not develop blind faith in any
country. A team of experts analyze risks carefully and invest gradually.
CHARACTERISTICS OF FDI
FDI is an activity by which an investor, who is a resident in one country, obtains a lasting
interest in, and is a significant influence on, the management of an entity in another country.
This may involve either creating an entirely new enterprise, a so-called “Greenfield”
investment, or more typically, changing the ownership of existing enterprises via mergers and
acquisitions. Other types of financial transactions between related enterprises, such as
reinvesting the earnings of the FDI enterprises or other capital transfers, are also defined as
foreign direct investment.
The American Motor Company (AMC) invested in the Shanghai Motor Company in China. All
others were on the beeline, including Japanese and South Korean companies besides other
American companies to invest in China.
Location – Specific advantages make FDI easier than exporting or licensing. Mahindra
tractors are manufactured in North America.
Contract manufactures – Brings down the cost of manufacturing and also contributes to
consolidating competitive sourcing and competing in the world market. Honda Motors
manufactures its vehicles in Europe.
Assured return on investment – R&D centres and futuristic projects enable the investor to
achieve great successes through high revenues. Roseh products invests huge amounts of
money in Genentech in California to get innovative products to their outlets around the
world.
More than two thousand multinationals from the U.S.A. and Europe have invested in
Chinese Special Economies Zones and Export Processing Zones. Indonesia, Thailand, the
Philippines, and Malaysia have now also become attractive destinations. Latin America, Brazil,
Argentina, and Columbia are also beginning to attract huge investments. Malta, Cyprus,
Panama, Mans Island, and Mauritius are growing only through Foreign Direct Investment, in
manufacturing, trading, and other forms. The reputation of such destinations depends on their
ability to attract investments through their policies and hassle-free industrial climates.
1. POLITICAL RISKS
2. ECONOMIC RISKS
INVESTMENT PATTERNS
BENEFITS AND COSTS OF FDI
Capital: Multinational enterprises invest in long-term projects, taking risks and repatriating
profits only when the projects yield returns.
Technology: The effects of technology emerge especially when the liberalization of the
investment flow drives a more rapid rate of technology development, diffusion, and
transfer. Such processes may involve the transfer of physical goods and/or the transfer of
knowledge. A vast majority of economic studies dealing with the relationship between FDI
and productivity and economic growth have found that the transfer of technology through
FDI has contributed positively to productivity and economic growth in host countries.
Market access: Investors can provide access to export markets. The growth of exports
themselves offers benefits, such as technological learning and competitive stimuli. They can
transform normal customers into intellectual customers.
Increase in domestic investment: The increase in FDI inflow is associated with a manifold
increase in the investment by national investors.
Export promotion: It seems that FDI could be related to export trade in goods, and the host
country can benefit from an FDI-led export growth.
Generating employment: FDI leads to the generation of both direct and indirect
employment opportunities in the host country.
Infrastructure: In order to facilitate and enable investors to perform well, the host country
studies other competitive destinations and enhances the level of infrastructure to match
the requirements of the investors. India’s Silver Valley in Bangalore, Hitech City in
Hyderabad, and Tidel Park in Chennai have revolutionized the areas through connectivity.
Social effects: Countries with closed economies have started to liberalize their economies
through market reforms that are favourable to foreign investors through privatization,
property rights, and liberal labour policies. Society at large benefits as employment,
infrastructure, literacy, and health care are bound to improve as an impact of FDI inflow.
Formation of Clusters: Groups of similar projects and manufacturing centres are formed in a
specific location by way of providing common production, R&D, training, and pollution
control systems to a group of competing companies. In Italy, Brazil, and India, such clusters
have worked wonders.
Spill over: Statistical evidence exists across the world to prove that FDIs have a number of
spill overs. Business history is replete with examples where individuals who trained with
companies started their own ventures and became successful leaders in their respective
fields. Silicon Valley in the U.S. provides many examples of such spin-offs. Intel is a spin-off
of Fairchild. The main competitor to Intel today is its own spin-off. Even in India, the
machine tool industries of Ludhiana and Bangalore are spin-offs of yesteryears’ popular
companies, such as SKF, Bosch and MICO.
The investing companies may not serve the host country’s interests.
The investing country has controlling technologies, for which it charges a huge technology
fee.
FDI can even wipe out local firms. Infant industries and other home industries may suffer if
they cannot compete. Home-country producers do not have money power or the
technology to withstand the onslaught of investors.
Profits are repatriated abroad. They may not stay in the country for reinvestment.
Major tax heavens will enjoy the money at the cost of home country.
Companies with operations solely in the home country have a limited scope for prosperity,
and in order to grow more quickly, investing in fertile grounds outside is a strategic move.
Location-specific advantages are important at the time of selecting the right destination:
3. The cost incurred in research and development can be recovered at the earliest by
identifying a suitable location.
4. The cost of transportation and logistics is low in the specific as well as neighbouring
countries.
Foreign Investments through GDRs, ADRs, and FCCBs are treated as Foreign Direct
Investments. Indian companies are allowed to raise equity capital in the international market
through the issuance of GDRs, ADRs, and FCCBs. These are not subject to any ceilings on
investment. A company seeking the Government’s approval in this regard should have a
consistent track record of good financial performance for a minimum of 3 years. This condition
can be relaxed for infrastructure projects, such as power generation, telecommunication,
petroleum exploration, and refining, ports, airports, and roads.
The proceeds of the GDRs can be used to finance capital goods imports, capital expenditures,
including the domestic purchase/installation of a plant, equipment and building, investments in
software development, prepayment or scheduled repayment of earlier external borrowings,
and equity investment in joint ventures and wholly-owned subsidiaries in India.
Restrictions
Investments in stock markets and real estate, however, are not permitted. Companies may
retain the proceeds abroad or may remit the funds into India in anticipation of the use of the
funds for approved end-uses. Any investment from a foreign firm into India requires the prior
approval of the Government of India.
FDI POLICY
The Government has put in place a liberal, transparent, and investor-friendly FDI policy,
wherein FDI up to 100% is allowed on the automatic route in most of the sectors, except in:
Proposals for the acquisition of shares in an existing Indian company in favour of non-
residents.
Activities where the automatic route is not available under the notified sectoral policy.
In view of sectoral policies, security concerns, and other strategic considerations, restrictions,
such as equity cap, divestment condition, minimum capitalization, and lock-in periods have
been imposed on FDI in some sectors, including:
6. Atomic energy.
The general policy and facilities for Foreign Direct Investment as available to foreign
investors/companies are fully applicable to NRIs as well. Additionally, the Government has
extended some concessions for NRIs and Overseas Corporate Bodies in which NRIs have
invested more than 60%. These include:
Since 2001, the investments of NRIs in India have grown 20% every year until 2007 due to
liberal policies. Some NRIs from the Middle East and Europe invest huge amounts in real
estate and SEZs. The confidence level towards India has increased amongst NRIs, resulting
huge investments in India.
The FDI policy is reviewed on an ongoing basis and suitable liberalization measures are
taken. Some of the main initiatives undertaken are mentioned below.
The issuance of equity shares has been allowed against a one-time fee or royalty and
External Commercial Borrowings received in convertible foreign currency, subject to
meeting all tax liabilities and procedures.
The foreign investment in the banking sector has been further liberalized by allowing an
FDI limit in private sector banks up to 74% under the automatic route including
investment by Foreign Institutional Investors.
The foreign banks regulated by a banking supervisory authority in the home country and
meeting the Reserve Bank’s licensing criteria have been allowed to hold 100% paid up
capital to enable them to set up a wholly-owned subsidiary in India.
An FDI up to 100% has been permitted in printing scientific and technical magazines,
periodicals, and journals, subject to compliance with all legalities and with the prior
approval of the Government.
An FDI up to 100% has been permitted on the automatic route for the marketing of
petroleum products, subject to the existing sectoral policy and regulatory framework in
the oil marketing sector.
An FDI up to 100% has been permitted on the automatic route in oil exploration in both
small- and medium-sized fields subject to and under the policy of the Government on
private participation in:
An FDI up to 100% has been permitted on the automatic route for petroleum product
pipelines subject to and permitted for Natural Gas/LNG pipelines with prior Government
approval.
An FDI of 100% is permitted in any venture related to Special Economic Zones and 100%
export oriented units, as a developer, unit holder, or service provider. The same scheme
is applicable to agricultural zones and technology parks.
In terms of the quantum of investment, Mauritius is the highest with 22.61% of total
approvals, followed by the U.S.A. (12.62%), the Netherlands (9.78%), the U.K.(8.28%), Japan
(5.68%), Singapore (3.59%), Germany (3.53%), Hong Kong (1.64%), Switzerland (1.39%), and
Belgium (1.27%). Other countries constitute the remaining 29.61% of approvals.
The drug and pharmaceutical sector holds a major share of the approvals, followed by the
services sector, both financial and non-financial; electrical equipment, including computer
software and electronics; the food processing industry; telecommunications; and
automobiles. All together, these account for 60% of approvals. Other sectors account for
the remaining 40% of approvals.
The choice of location for projects depends on the commercial judgment of investors and is
based on factors such as market size, growth potential, the availability of skilled man-
power, the availability and reliability of infrastructure facilities, and fiscal and other
incentives provided by State Governments. The Central Government supplements the
efforts of the State Government by providing fiscal incentives for investments in the
infrastructure sector as well as high-priority industries, such as information technology,
through specific schemes such as the Growth Center Schemes, the Transport Subsidy
Schemes, the New Industrial Policy for the Northeast and other hill states, the Electronics
Hardware Technology Park (EHTP), the Software Technology Park (STP), Export Promotion
Zones (EPZs), and Special Economic Zones (SEZs). Maharashtra, Delhi, Tamil Nadu,
Karnataka, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Orissa, and Uttar
Pradesh accounted for a major portion of FDI investment approvals during the cumulative
period, i.e. from August 1991 to March 2004.
Several steps have been initiated during the year to facilitate increased FDI inflows, which
include, inter alia, the following:
On the policy front: While our FDI policy is already very liberal, it is being further
progressively liberalized. Equity caps in the banking sector, the petroleum sector, and
the printing of scientific/technical magazines, periodicals, and journals have recently
been raised as a measure of further liberalisation of the policy.
On the competitiveness front: The Government has received reports regarding various
studies on the current potentials and risks involved in various business activities in India.
Different sectors with competitive advantages have been enlisted to attract foreign
investments.
An exclusive website has been set up and hosted by the promotion authorities. It is
comprehensive and informative with online chat facilities. About 2000 investment-
related queries were replied to during the year.
Every state government takes a major initiative, such as Vibrant Gujarat, to bring in
investors from around the world, showcase their advantages, and encourage them to
invest.
Inflows of FDI would depend on domestic economic conditions, the FDI policy, world
economic trends, and the strategies of global investors. The Government, on its part, is fully
committed to creating strong economic fundamentals and an increasingly proactive FDI
policy regime.
The positive efforts of the Government towards improving the investment climate,
including the sustained improvement of infrastructure, have led to renewed optimism
about India as an emerging investment destination.
4. Heckscher-Ohlin Theory
Swedish economists Eli Heckscher (in 1919) and Bertil Ohlin (in 1933) argued that comparative
advantage arises from differences in national factor endowments. By factor endowments they
meant the extent to which a country is endowed with such resources as land, labor, and
capital Nations have varying factor endowments, and different factor endowments explain
differences in factor costs. The more abundant a factor, the lower its cost. The Heckscher-
Ohlin theory predicts that countries will export those goods that make intensive use of factors
that are locally abundant, while importing goods that make intensive use of factors that are
locally scarce. Thus, the Heckscher-Ohlin theory attempts to explain the pattern of
international trade that we observe in the world economy. Like Ricardo’s theory the
Heckscher-Ohlin theory argues that free trade is beneficial. Unlike Ricardo’s theory, however,
the Heckscher-Ohlin theory argues that the pattern of international trade is determined by
differences in factor endowments, rather than differences in productivity. The Heckscher-Ohlin
theory also has commonsense appeal. For example, ‘United States has long been a substantial
exporter of agricultural goods, reflecting in part its unusual abundance of arable land. In
contrast, China excels in the export of goods produced in labor-intensive manufacturing
industries, such as textiles and footwear. This reflects China’s relative abundance of low-cost
labor. The United States, which lacks abundant low-cost labor, has been a primary importer of
these goods. Note that it is relative, not absolute, endowments that are important; a country
may have larger absolute amounts of land and labor than another country, but be relatively
abundant in one of them.
The Leontief Paradox
Using the Heckscher Ohlin theory, Wassily Leontief postulated that since the United States was
relatively abundant in capital compared to other nations, the United States would be an
exporter of capital-intensive goods and an importer of labor-intensive goods. To his surprise,
however, ‘he found that U.S. exports were less capital intensive than U.S. imports. Since this
result was at variance with the predictions of the theory, it has become known as the Leontief
paradox. No one is quite sure why we observe the Leontief paradox. One possible explanation
is that the United States has a special advantage in producing new products or goods made
with innovative technologies. Such products may be less capital intensive than products whose
technology has had time to mature and become suitable for mass production. Thus, the United
States may be exporting goods that heavily use skilled labor and innovative entrepreneurship,
such as computer software, while importing heavy manufacturing products that use large
amounts of capital.
Wassily Leontief (winner of the Nobel Prize in economics in 1973), many of these tests have
raised questions about the validity of the Heckscher- Ohlin theory.
As per Heckscher- Ohlin theory Leontief postulated that since the united States was relatively
abundant in capital compared to other nations, the united States would be an exporter of
capital-intensive goods and an importer of labor-intensive goods. To his surprise, however, ‘he
found that U.S. exports were less capital intensive than U.S. imports. Since this result was at
variance with the predictions of the theory, it has become known as the Leontief paradox.
No one is quite sure why we observe the Leontief paradox. One possible explanation is that
the United States has a special advantage in producing new products or goods made with
innovative technologies. Such products may be less capital intensive than products whose
technology has had time to mature and become suitable for mass production. Thus, United
States may be exporting goods that heavily use skilled labor and innovative entrepreneurship,
such as computer software, while importing heavy manufacturing products that use large
amounts of capital.
Example : As per the theory, United States exports commercial aircraft and imports
automobiles not because its factor endowments are especially suited to aircraft manufacture
and not suited to automobile manufacture, but because the United States is more efficient at
producing aircraft than automobiles. A key assumption in the Heckscher-Ohlin theory is that
technologies are .the same across countries. This may not to be the case, and differences in
technology may lead to differences in productivity, which in turn, drives international trade
patterns.
5. The Product Life Cycle Theory
Raymond Vernon initially proposed the product life-cycle theory in the mid-1960s. Vernon’s
theory was based on the observation that for most of the 20th century a very large proportion
of the world’s new products had been developed by U.S. firms and sold first in the U.S. market
(e.g.mass-produced automobiles, televisions, instant cameras, photocopiers, personal
computers, and semiconductor chips). To explain this, Vernon argued that the wealth and size
of the U.S market gave U.S. firms a strong incentive to develop new consumer products.
Inaddition, the high cost of U.S. labor gave U.S. firms an incentiveto develop cost-saving
process innovations. -Just because a new product is developed by a U.S. firm and first sold in
the U.S. market, it does not follow that the product must be produced in the United States. It
could be produced abroad at some low-cost location and then exported back into the United
States. However, Vernon argued that most new products were initially products were initially
produced- in America. Apparently, the pioneering firms believed it was better to keep
production facilities close the market and to the firm’s center of decision making, given the
uncertainty and risks inherent in introducing new products. Also, the demand for most new
products tends to be based on nonprice factors.
Consequently, firms can charge relatively high prices for new products, which obviate the need
to look for low cost production sites in other countries. Vernon went on to argue that early in
the life cycle of a typical new product, demand is starting to grow rapidly in the United States,
demand in other advance countries is limited to highincome groups. The limited initial demand
in other advanced countries does not make it worthwhile for firms in those countries to start
producing the new product, but it does necessitate some exports from the United States to
those countries.
Over time, demand for the new product starts to grow in other advanced countries (e.g., Great
Britain, France, Germany, and Japan). As it does, it becomes worthwhile for foreign producers
to begin producing for their home markets. In addition, U.S.firms might set up production
facilities in those advanced countries where demand is growing. Consequently, production
within other advanced countries begins to limit the potential for exports from the United
States. As the market in the United States and other advanced nations matures, the product
becomes more standardized, and price becomes the main competitive weapon. As this occurs,
cost considerations start to play a greater role in the competitive process. Producers based in
advanced countries where labor costs are lower than in the United States (e.g., Italy, Spain)
might now be able to export to the United States. If cost pressures become intense, the
process might, not stop there. The cycle by which the United States lost its advantage to other
advanced countries might be repeated once more, as developing countries (e.g., Thailand)
begin to acquire a production advantage over advanced countries. Thus, the locus of global
production initially switches from the United States to other advanced nations and then from
those nations to developing countries.
The consequence of these trends for the pattern of world trade is that is over time the United
States switches, from being an exporter of the Product to an importer of product as
production becomes concentrated in lower-cost foreign locations.
Figure 2.5 shows the growth of production and consumption over time in the United States,
other advanced countries, and developing countries.
New Trade Theory (NTT) is the economic critique of international free trade from the
perspective of increasing returns to scale and the network effect
Implication:
"NTD" was the rigor of the mathematical economics used to model the increasing
returns to scale, and especially the use of the network effect to argue that the
formation of important industries was path dependent in a way which industrial
planning and judicious tariffs might control.
The model they developed was highly technical, and predicted the possibilities of
national specialization-by-industry observed in the industrial world. The story of path-
dependent industrial concentrations sometimes leads to monopolistic competition.
Econometric evidence:
The econometric evidence for NTT was mixed, and again, highly technical. Due to the
time-scales required and the particular nature of production in each 'monopolizable'
sector, statistical judgements have been hard to make. In many ways, there is too
limited a dataset to produce a reliable test of the hypothesis which doesn't require
arbitrary judgements from the researchers.
Japan is cited as evidence of the benefits of "intelligent" protectionism, but critics of NTT have
argued that the empirical support post-war Japan offers for beneficial protectionism is
unusual, and that the NTT argument is based on a selective sample of historical cases.
Although many examples (like Japanese cars) can be cited where a 'protected' industry
subsequently grew to world status, regressions on the outcomes of such "industrial policies" .
Stage:1 “Physical (i) Identify one (i) Local resistance for (i) Successful entry into
movement of country. outsider . one country.
goods and
(ii) Focus on one (ii) Technical and (ii) Learning experience
services from
product or service. commercial barriers. outside of the home
the country of
its origin”. (iii) Explore the (iii) Competitive forces country.
opportunity for from local and
exports. imported goods.
“Strengthen (i) Build a strong (i) Local competitors (i) Strengthen one
and stabilize relationship in one pose threats. country by overcoming all
one overseas market. the hurdles.
(ii) A price war is
Stage:2 market.”
(ii) Promote brand inevitable. (ii) One or few importers
name with extend cooperation and
customers and support for a constant
channels. flow of goods.
“Establish a (i) Narrow down to (i) Competitors (i) Local production brings
manufacturing one local partner. increase their down the cost.
base in the production capacity.
(ii) Locate an ideal (ii) The enterprise
Stage:3 importing
place for production. (ii) Local regulations on becomes close to the
country”.
labour, transaction, customers.
(iii) Workout for
and infrastructure may
synergy together. (iii) Brand loyalty is built.
trouble the operation.
“Spread the (i) Quickly develop a (i) Every part of the (i) Access in the whole
distribution network in the region works region.
and increase neighbouring differently.
(ii) Easy to experiment in
production in countries.
(ii) Rules are not other regions.
Stage:4 the region”.
(ii) Set up a network uniform.
(iii) Revenue is increased.
of warehouses and
(iii) Demand level is not
sub-dealers in the
similar in every
region.
country.
Stage:5 “Move to other (i) Set up (i) Cross cultural (i) Global take-off
regions by subsidiaries. complexities. assured.
investing and
(ii) Develop strong (ii) Local adaptability. (ii) The enterprise has a
producing”.
systems. competency in a skill, and
(iii) Promotional
the knowledge to go
(iii) Induct right barriers.
global.
people with
performance and
target.
(iv)Flexible to local
environment.
Globalization is the “strategy of optimizing” the resources available in various countries and
catering to customers throughout the world with internationally standardized products at
competitive prices. It advocates that the nation, company, or product involved be global. A
global man is one who is born in India, studies in the UK, wears Reid & Taylor, shops at Marks &
Spencer, drives a Lexus, acquires a steel plant in Kazakhstan, and ships his hot-rolled coil to
China. Thus, he becomes a part of globalization process.
Liberalisation, the rise of developing countries, new technologies, and falling trade
barriers are profoundly changing the economic landscape and contributing to fast-track
globalization in many countries. We are increasingly living in a global world. In practical terms,
this means that a steel company in the United States will consider other countries as well as the
U.S. when deciding where to locate a new $1 billion steel mill. Other examples are automobile
manufacturers, such as Ford Motors, who entered emerging markets such as China or India
with modified versions of existing cars, rather than designing a new car from scratch; and
Mazda, which designs its sports car in California, produces components in Tokyo, makes
prototypes in Worthington, and finally, assembles the car in Mexico in order to market it in
North America at a very low price. China sources its fibre from South Korea, uses funds from
Macau, a labour force in Beijing, and finally, markets its soft toys all over the world.
The economic landscape is not the same as it was twenty years ago, nor is the pace of
global economic change expected to slacken in the next twenty years. This will have an effect
on people in any position. India’s finance minister will have to view the integration of India’s
economy with the rest of the world as fundamental to the country’s transformation into an
economic superpower, and a junior manager in a firm will have virtually no chance of making it
into the top ranks of the company unless s/he combines superb qualities, skills, and job
performance with extensive international experience.
Assuming the trends described here are inevitable, the following issues need serious
consideration by any medium or large company inclined to go global.
2. Location advantage:
To what extent do you want to capture the cost-reducing and quality-enhancing potential of
locations around the world for the execution of various activities in your company’s value
chain? How should you deal with the problem of suboptimal locations currently in use?
3. Global competitiveness:
How effective do you want to be in exploiting a global presence and making your company truly
globally competitive, as opposed to globally mediocre? How should you eliminate existing
shortcomings and impediments?
Is the mindset of your company’s top management sufficiently global? As the world around you
changes and new opportunities open up in various parts of the world, is your company
generally a leader or a laggard in identifying and exploiting these opportunities? How should
you create the needed global mindset?
Does your company have a vision? Is the vision present in every individual? Is the proper
roadmap in place? Is it only for the generating money, or for leadership?
Do you have sufficient human resources to handle a global environment – more specifically,
technical resources? Or are such resources yet to be appointed in the location of operation?
Once a company has selected the country or countries that will serve as a launch vehicle for its
products, it must determine the appropriate mode of entry. This issue rests on two
fundamental questions:
To what extent will the company rely on exports versus local production in the target
market?
Here, the firm has the following range of choices: 100% export of finished goods, export of
components with a localized assembly line, 100% local production.
To what extent will the company exercise ownership and control over the activities carried
out locally in the target market? Again, it faces the following range of choices: 0%
ownership through licensing or franchising, partial ownership such as joint ventures or
collaborations, 100% ownership as a wholly owned subsidiary.
1. Larger local production: The local market is larger than the minimum efficient scale of
production. The larger the local market, the more local production will translate into scale
economies while holding down tariff and transportation costs. An example of this is the
Japanese tire group, Bridgestone, who, instead of exporting tires from Japan, entered the
U.S. market through the acquisition of the local production base of Firestone.
2. Cost of logistics and tariffs: The shipping and tariff costs of exporting to the target market
are so high that they neutralize any cost advantages of manufacturing the product at any
place other than the target market. This is the main reason why cement companies, such as
Cemex and Lafarge Copper, engage heavily in local production in all of the countries they
enter.
3. Localization and customization of products : The need to customize products to suit local
requirements is high. The customization of a product requires a deep understanding of local
market needs and the ability to incorporate this understanding into product design and
marketing. Localising production in the target market area significantly enhances a firm’s
ability to respond to local market needs.
4. Requirement for local production: This refers to situations in which there is a strong
requirement for local production by the host country. This is one of the major reasons why
foreign automobile companies rely heavily on local production in markets such as the
European Union, China, and India. The Hyundai Corporation has strengthened its
production base in India and its components are procured in India.
Besides the above criteria, the strategic approach for successful companies could be on the
following lines:
Entering the market through an alliance permits a company to share the costs and risks
associated with market entry and allow rapid access to local knowledge.However, it also has
the potential for various types of conflict.
7. What is risk analysis? How do companies overcome risks?
Any business is affected by its external environment. The major macroeconomic factors in the
external environment that affect the business are political, environmental, social and
technological.
A. POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT
The political environment of a country greatly influences the business operating in those
countries or business trading with those countries. The success and growth of international
business depends on the stable, collaborative, conducive and secure political system in the
country.
1. Tax Policy:
The tax policy of a country affects the profitability of the business there. The Corporate
Taxation laws affect the profitability directly. The direct taxation laws also affect the
business because it influences consumer spending. The structure of indirect taxation in
a country like its excise duty structure, customs and sales tax greatly affects the input
costs of a business.
For e.g. Countries like UAE have very low direct taxation levels inducing great spending
and hence trading and marketing based business are successful. But due to very high
indirect taxation levels the manufacturing business is not very successful.
2. Government support:
One of the most important political factor is the Government support to international
businesses. Business can be successful only if the local government provides support in
terms o infrastructure, license clearing if required, transparent policy and quick dispute
resolution mechanism. Also the nature of the political system i.e. democracy,
communism etc. in the country influences the Government support.
For e.g. the RBI has provided single window clearance for FDI and hence has greatly
increased the FDI levels in our country.
3. Labour Laws:
The labour laws in a country affect the viability of a business in that country. The
pension laws also play a critical role especially in cross border acquisitions. Many
businesses had to be withdrawn or closed because of the labor unrest in the country.
For e.g.: Withdrawal of Premier Automobiles due to union strikes in our country. The
problems faced by doctors and nurses in UK due to the restrictive laws in that country.
4. Environmental policy:
The countries environmental policy (under the Kyoto Protocol or otherwise) affects
many business like chemicals, refineries and heavy engineering.
1. Economic system:
The economic system in a country i.e. capitalism/ communism/ mixed economy (India)
is important for deciding the nature of the businesses. The nature of the system decides
the allocation of resources. Due to globalization there is a gradual shift toward market
forces to allocate resources even in the communist countries like China.
2. Interest rates:
The interest rates in the country affect the cost of capital (if raised locally) and the
operational costs. Interest rates also determine the confidence of the Government in
the economy and consumer spending.
3. Exchange rates:
The exchange rates affect international trade and capital inflows in the country.
4. Income levels and spending pattern:
Though it is more of a demographic parameter has is very important bearing on the sell
side of all international businesses. For e.g. In a country like India, with rising a spirer
population there is a market opportunity for products like IPod (considered luxury items
till now)
C. SOCIAL FACTORS
Businesses are driven by people both as human capital and as consumers. It is necessary for an
international businessman to understand the social and cultural aspects of the country they
operate in. The following are the important social factors.
1. Age distribution:
The age distribution of the population is important to consider the consumption
patterns in the markets. Age distribution also determines the mindset of the market
and helps segmentation of the market accordingly. It also has a bearing on the
employee quality. A young population also determines a workforce.
2. Family system:
The family system has a bearing on the decision makers in consumption. For e.g. in
Islamic countries women have a less say in making consumption decisions. In emerging
economies like India children are gaining important role in consumption. This helps in
positioning of products.
3. Cultural aspects:
The cultural aspects influence the way the business is conducted in countries. In Japan
there is a different way in which contracts are signed and executed. In Russia being a
communist oriented mindset the business is conducted in a closed manner. Italians have
a seemingly lazy way of doing business and hence it is very difficult to conduct business
in the pacy US way.
4. Career attitudes:
The career attitude of the workforce is important social aspect.
D. TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS
Technology has a very important role to play in determining the success of international
businesses because technology has made international business possible. The following are the
technological factors that influence the business.
1. R&D:
The support that the Government gives to R&D encourages setting up R&D business
levels. Also the ease of a qualified local workforce influence business.
For e.g. The semiconductor industry in Taiwan
2. Technology transfer:
The ease of technology transfer influences the business climate. The environment where
the technology transfer is not viable gradually loses out on business from emerging
countries that seek technology transfers. For e.g. in the early 40s countries like
Czechoslovakia (the Czech Republic) was a very technologically advanced country but had
very low business interest due to the less chances of technology transfers. For e.g. GE
withdrew operations from a JV as there as they could not access local expertise)
While analyzing foreign environment companies have to pay close attention to various factors
that will effect, or help if used efficiently, future success of business in a new economy. First of
all it is necessary to carefully examine the firm’s competitive position and understand if a
project is able to bring profit in the global industry. Adequate financial resources, successful
global ventures in the past, risk levels that a company is able to undertake and growing
international demand are those few questions that need to posed before a firm can make any
projections as to doing business abroad. There are also factors that are directly connected to
specific projects and situations and that influence the outcome of the venture and have to be
considered.
In case when a company is ready to start international project in terms of its internal situation,
it has to study issues and challenges that are caused by macro economical and other
environmental factors. Legal and political factors are essential for the implementation of the
project abroad and each country has its own laws and regulations that could be of negative or
positive influence which greatly depends on the nature of business. Economic condition of the
host county is a core issue in deciding where and when project will be carried out and if it is
feasible at all. Such environmental issues as GDP, inflation fluctuations and population growth
have to be considered in order to comprehend conditions in which business will operate.
Infrastructure and geography are among other factors that will affect the project or not allow
its execution in case a host county has severe weather conditions or undeveloped
infrastructure; for instance unpaved roads and no electrical power can easily fail the project in
the very beginning and thus knowing such conditions is necessary. Security of the country in
which project will be developed is essential as well, people make things happen and if they are
in a dangerous environment it is priory impossible to do business. Workers who are
knowledgeable about cultural differences in a host country are more likely to perform
successfully as traditions and holidays can play a huge role in certain marketing campaigns and
serve for the good image of the company.
Working in a foreign country requires a great deal of preparation and assessment of all possible
differences that the business is about to encounter. As was already said, major role in deciding
whether or not the project will be successful is comprehending macro environment of a new
country. Studying its economical condition, security levels and infrastructure system is a core
competence of a company who wants to be more successful that its competitors. In case when
all of those factors are studied and considered advantageous for a new enterprise, it is
important to bear in mind that cultural differences can make all efforts void. Thus businesses
must attentively analyze what changes have to be made in the business plan and what people
are best suit for its implementation. Often, companies hire professionals already experienced in
such ventures with foreign education who speak two or more languages. Those intermediaries
who are familiar with host country’s traditions and have social connections are great helpers in
establishing a good image of the company abroad and in avoiding mistakes in a setting up
period.
Selecting and training employees for the international project is very important for the future
success of the company. Culture shock and coping with it are issues that have to be addressed
to potential workers. Consequently firms need to inform and train employees on how to cope
with cultural diversities and benefit from them to better manage in the new environment.
9. What is WTO? How does it function to maintain its agenda? Discuss its
achievements and limitations?
10. Discuss the importance of international organizations and their role to promote
international business.
11. How will you do business with NAFTA?
12. Discuss the business strategy to do business in European Union.
13. How will you do business in ASEAN?
Mercosur is a regional trade agreement among Argentina, Brazil ,Paraguay & Uruguay founded
in 1991 by the Treaty of Asunción, which was later amended and updated by the 1994 Treaty of
Ouro Preto. Its purpose is to promote free trade and the fluid movement of goods, people, and
currency. Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru currently have associate member status.
Venezuela signed a membership agreement on 17 June 2006, but before becoming a full
member its entry has to be ratified by the Paraguayan and the Brazilian parliaments.
The bloc comprises a population of more than 263 million people, and the combined Gross
Domestic Product of the full-member nations is in excess of US$2.78 trillion a year (Purchasing
power parity, PPP) according to International Monetary Fund (IMF) numbers, making Mercosur
the fifth largest economy in the World.
OBJECTIVES OF MERCOSUR
Free transit of production goods, services and factors between the member states with
inter alia, the elimination of customs rights and lifting of nontariff restrictions on the transit
of goods or any other measures with similar effects;
Fixing of a common external tariff (TEC) and adopting of a common trade policy with regard
to non member states or groups of states, and the coordination of positions in regional and
international commercial and economic meetings;
Coordination of macroeconomic and sectorial policies of member states relating to foreign
trade, agriculture, industry, taxes, monetary system, exchange and capital, services,
customs, transport and communications, and any others they may agree on, in order to
ensure free competition between member states; and
The commitment by the member states to make the necessary adjustments to their laws in
pertinent areas to allow for the strengthening of the integration process. The Asuncion
Treaty is based on the doctrine of the reciprocal rights and obligations of the member
states.
MERCOSUR initially targeted free-trade zones, then customs unification and, finally, a common
market, where in addition to customs unification the free movement of manpower and capital
across the member nations' international frontiers is possible, and depends on equal rights and
duties being granted to all signatory countries. During the transition period, as a result of the
chronological differences in actual implementation of trade liberalization by the member states,
the rights and obligations of each party will initially be equivalent but not necessarily equal. In
addition to the reciprocity doctrine, the Asuncion Treaty also contains provisions regarding the
most-favored nation concept, according to which the member nations undertake to
automatically extend--after actual formation of the common market--to the other Treaty
signatories any advantage, favor, entitlement, immunity or privilege granted to a product
originating from or intended for countries that are not party to ALADI.
SAARC
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) is an economic and political
organization of eight countries in Southern Asia. It was established on December 8, 1985 by
India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Maldives and Bhutan. In April 2007, at the
Association's 14th summit, Afghanistan became its eighth member.Sheelkant Sharma is the
current secretary & Mahinda Rajapaksa is the current chairman of SAARC which is
headquartered at Kathmandu.
OBJECTIVES OF SAARC
To promote the welfare of the peoples of South Asia and to improve their quality of life;
To accelerate economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region
and to provide all individuals the opportunity to live in dignity and to realize their full
potential;
To promote and strengthen collective self-reliance among the countries of South Asia;
To contribute to mutual trust, understanding and appreciation of one another's
problems;
To promote active collaboration and mutual assistance in the economic, social, cultural,
technical and scientific fields;
To strengthen cooperation with other developing countries;
To strengthen cooperation among themselves in international forums on matters of
common interest; and
To cooperate with international and regional organizations with similar aims and
purposes.
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
Over the years, the SAARC members have expressed their unwillingness on signing a free trade
agreement. Though India has several trade pacts with Maldives, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka,
similar trade agreements with Pakistan and Bangladesh have been stalled due to political and
economic concerns on both sides. India has been constructing a barrier across its borders with
Bangladesh and Pakistan. In 1993, SAARC countries signed an agreement to gradually lower
tariffs within the region, in Dhaka. Eleven years later, at the 12th SAARC Summit at Islamabad,
SAARC countries devised the South Asia Free Trade Agreement which created a framework for
the establishment of a free trade area covering 1.4 billion people. This agreement went into
force on January 1, 2006. Under this agreement, SAARC members will bring their duties down
to 20 per cent by 2007.
The last summit (15th) was held in Colombo where four major agreements - the SAARC
development fund, the establishment of a SAARC standard organization, the SAARC convention
on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, and the protocol on Afghanistan's admission to
the South Asia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) were adopted with emphasis on region-wide
food security.
NAFTA
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trilateral trade bloc in North America
created by the governments of the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In terms of combined
purchasing power parity GDP of its members, as of 2007 the trade bloc is the largest in the
world and second largest by nominal GDP comparison. It also is one of the most powerful,
wide-reaching treaties in the world.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has two supplements, the North American
Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) and the North American Agreement on
Labor Cooperation (NAALC).
Implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) began on January 1,
1994. This agreement will remove most barriers to trade and investment among the United
States, Canada, and Mexico.
Under the NAFTA, all non-tariff barriers to agricultural trade between the United States and
Mexico were eliminated. In addition, many tariffs were eliminated immediately, with others
being phased out over periods of 5 to 15 years. This allowed for an orderly adjustment to free
trade with Mexico, with full implementation beginning January 1, 2008.
The agricultural provisions of the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement, in effect since 1989, were
incorporated into the NAFTA. Under these provisions, all tariffs affecting agricultural trade
between the United States and Canada, with a few exceptions for items covered by tariff-rate
quotas, were removed by January 1, 1998.
Mexico and Canada reached a separate bilateral NAFTA agreement on market access for
agricultural products. The Mexican-Canadian agreement eliminated most tariffs either
immediately or over 5, 10, or 15 years.
U.S. trade with Mexico and Canada has grown more rapidly than total U.S. trade since 1994.
The automotive, textile, and apparel industries have experienced the most significant changes
in trade flows, which may also have affected employment levels in these industries. The five
major U.S. industries that have high volumes of trade with Mexico and Canada are automotive
industry, chemicals and allied products, computer equipment, textiles and apparel, and
microelectronics.
The effects of NAFTA, both positive and negative, have been quantified by several economists.
Some argue that NAFTA has been positive for Mexico, which has seen its poverty rates fall and
real income rise (in the form of lower prices, especially food), even after accounting for the
1994–1995 economic crisis. Others argue that NAFTA has been beneficial to business owners
and elites in all three countries, but has had negative impacts on farmers in Mexico who saw
food prices fall based on cheap imports from U.S. agribusiness, and negative impacts on U.S.
workers in manufacturing and assembly industries who lost jobs. Critics also argue that NAFTA
has contributed to the rising levels of inequality in both the U.S. and Mexico.
EU
The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union of 27 member states, located
primarily in Europe. The EU generates an estimated 30% share of the world's nominal gross
domestic product (US$16.8 trillion in 2007). Thus EU presents an enormous export and investor
market that is both mature and sophisticated.
The EU has developed a single market through a standardised system of laws which apply in all
member states, guaranteeing the freedom of movement of people, goods, services and capital.
It maintains a common trade policy. Fifteen member states have adopted a common currency,
the euro.
OBJECTIVES OF THE EU
Its principal goal is to promote and expand cooperation among members’ states in economics,
trade, social issues, foreign policies, security, defense, and judicial matters. Another major goal
of the EU is to implement the Economic and Monetary Union, which introduced a single
currency, the Euro for the EU members.
The single market refers to the creation of a fully integrated market within the EU, which allows
for free movement of goods, services and factors of production. The EU, in conjunction with
Member States, has a number of policies designed to assist the functioning of the market. Some
of the policies are given below:
Competition Policy: The main competition lied in energy and transport sector. The union
designed this strategy to prevent price fixing, collusion (secret agreement), and abuse of
monopoly.
Free movement of goods: A custom union covering all trade in goods was established and a
common customs tariff was adopted with respect to countries outside the union.
Services: Any member nation has a right to provide services in other Member States.
Capital: There are no restrictions on the movement of capital and on payments with the EU and
between member states and third countries.
India was one of the first Asian nations to accord recognition to the European Community in
1962. The EU is India’s largest trading partner and biggest source of FDI. It is a major
contributor of developmental aid and an important source of technology. Over the years, EU –
India trade has grown from 4.4 bn to 28.4 bn US$.
India is EU’s 17th largest supplier and 20th largest destination for exports.
Tariff and non-tariffs have been reduced, but compared to International standards they are
still high.
Under the Bilateral trade between India and EU, it accounts for 26% of India’s exports and
25% of its imports.
The European Union (EU) and India agreed on September 29,2008 at the EU-India summit in
Marseille, France's largest commercial port, to expand their cooperation in the fields of
nuclear energy and environmental protection and deepen their strategic partnership.
Trade between India and the 27-nation EU has more than doubled from 25.6 billion euros
($36.7 billion) in 2000 to 55.6 billion euros last year, with further expansion to be seen.
ASEAN
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations or ASEAN was established on 8 August 1967 in
Bangkok by the five original Member Countries, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines,
Singapore, and Thailand. Brunei Darussalam joined on 8 January 1984, Vietnam on 28 July
1995, Laos and Myanmar on 23 July 1997, and Cambodia on 30 April 1999.
OBJECTIVES
The ASEAN Declaration states that the aims and purposes of the Association are:
(i) To accelerate the economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the
region through joint endeavors.
(ii) To promote regional peace and stability through abiding respect for justice and the rule
of law in the relationship among countries in the region and adherence to the principles
of the United Nations Charter.
(iii) To maintain close cooperation with the existing international and regional organizations
with similar aims.
WORKING OF ASEAN
The member countries of ASEAN have Preferential Trading Arrangements (PTA), which reduces
tariffs on products traded among member countries. In 1992, ASEAN developed a Common
Effective Preferential Tariffs (CEPT) plan to reduce tariffs systematically for manufactured and
processed products.
The members have also established a series of co-operative efforts to encourage joint
participation in industrial, agricultural and technical development projects and to increase
foreign investments in their economies. These efforts include an ASEAN finance corporation,
the ASEAN Industrial Joint Ventures Programme (AJIV) etc. ASEAN nations have introduced
some programmes for greater diversification in their economies.
14. Compare and contrast the business potential in India and China.
PARAMETER India
FDI or Foreign Direct Investment is any form of investment that earns interest in enterprises
which function outside of the domestic territory of the investor
Types:
1) Outward FDI: An outward-bound FDI is backed by the government against all types of
associated risks. This form of FDI is subject to tax incentives as well as disincentives of various
forms
2) Inward FDI: Here, investment of foreign capital occurs in local resources.
3) Vertical FDI: It takes place when a multinational corporation owns some shares of a foreign
enterprise, which supplies input for it or uses the output produced by the MNC.
4) Horizontal FDI: It happens when a multinational company carries out a similar business
operation in different nations.
I] CLIMATE IN INDIA: Several factors being attributed to the revival in foreign direct
investments (FDI) in the country include liberal investment policies and reforms, innovative and
technologically advanced products being manufactured in India and low cost and effective
solutions. FDI equity inflows amounting to US$ 10.532 billion were received during April-July
2009. The largest FDI of US$ 153.31 million will be brought in by Essel Group-promoted DTH
service provider. India is targeting annual foreign direct investments worth $50 billion by 2012.
It would double the inflows by 2017. The government has approved 17 (FDI) proposals
amounting to US$ 250.56 million. Among those projects approved were FDI applications for
steel maker ArcelorMittal and iron pipe maker Electrosteel Castings. With the government
planning more liberalisation measures across a broad range of sectors and continued investor
interest, the inflow of FDI into India is likely to further accelerate.
II]CLIMATE IN CHINA: The top sources of FDI in China in 2008 were: Hong Kong, the British
Virgin Islands, Singapore, Japan, the Cayman Islands, South Korea, the United States, Western
Samoa, and Taiwan.
The growth rate of foreign direct investment (FDI) into China accelerated to 23% in 2008 to
$92.3 billion, according to Ministry of Commerce statistics. According to the United Nations
Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), in 2007, mainland China was the world’s
sixth largest FDI recipient, after the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Canada, and the
Netherlands. China also received the most votes in a 2007 UNCTAD poll of attractive
investment destinations, followed by India, the United States, Russia, Brazil, and Vietnam.
While FDI in China shot higher, investors continued to face a range of potential problems that
could expose them to risks in the future. Problems foreign investors face in China include lack
of transparency, inconsistently enforced laws and regulations, weak IPR protection, corruption,
industrial policies that protect and promote local firms, and an unreliable legal system. In 2008,
China continued to lay out a legal and regulatory framework granting it the authority to restrict
foreign investment that it deems not to be in China’s national interest. In many ways, the new
rules, codify standards and practices that China was already employing in its existing,
mandatory foreign investment approval process. Key terms and standards in the new
regulations are undefined. At the moment, China appears to be using the rules to restrict
foreign investments that are:
Investment Guidelines
While insisting it remains open to inward investment, China’s leadership has also stated that
China is actively seeking to target investment in higher value-added sectors, including high
technology research and development, advanced manufacturing, energy efficiency, and
modern agriculture and services, rather than basic manufacturing. China would also seek to
spread the benefits of foreign investment beyond China’s more wealthy coastal areas by
encouraging multinationals to establish regional headquarters and operations in Central,
Western, and Northeastern China.
The vast majority of foreign investment is concentrated in China's more prosperous coastal
areas, including Guangdong, Jiangsu, Fujian, and Shandong provinces, and Shanghai. Foreign
investment in most service sectors lags manufacturing, mainly due to government-imposed
restrictions. China is committed to gradually phasing out barriers in many service industries, but
progress has been slow
Dispute Settlement
Foreign firms report inconsistent results with all of China’s dispute settlement mechanisms,
none of which are independent of the government. The government often intervenes in
disputes. Corruption may also influence local court decisions and local officials may disregard
the judgments of domestic courts. Well-connected local business people are often in a better
position to win court cases than are foreign investors and it is possible that they may use their
connections to avoid prosecution for taking illegal actions against their former foreign partners.
China’s legal system rarely enforces foreign court judgments
As the economy has slowed, there have been anecdotal reports of local governments singling
out foreign investors, clients, and partners of Chinese businesses to repay debts incurred by
local businesses
III] CLIMATE IN VIETNAM
Vietnam has seen a vertical surge in its FDI inflows in the recent years, thus becoming the
third most popular investment destination after China and India. The Vietnamese government
is also trying its best to mould the existing policies and laws, so as to keep the capital flow
coming. Statistically speaking, the FDI pledges in Vietnam have galloped from a meager $ 11.3
billion in 2005 to $ 50 million in 2008. This year though the FDI flows have taken a drubbing
because of the volatile economic prevalence and thus the reluctance of the foreign majors to
part with the cash, but the experts feel that Vietnam’s identity as an investor’s heaven is here
to stay. The major factors in the country which have led, multinationals park huge investments
in the country can be tabulated as follows-
Construction
High-tech areas
Production of electronics
Telecommunications
thus turning Vietnam into a manufacturing hub in Asia.
In 2009, the expected inflows in the country in the form of FDI pledges are reported to plunge
drastically on account of the skepticism, on the part of the global investors, due to the ongoing
slowdown. Experts have forecasted a figure of $ 20-25 billion for this financial year in terms of
the FDI pledges, which is a fall of above 60%. Apart from the slowdown, the various reasons
that can be attributed to the same are doubts of Vietnam’s capability to digest such huge
investment sums. The various factors that play a role here are
inadequate infrastructure
Management problems
Shortage of adequately trained human resource
This lack of absorption capability has become a huge spoilsport as it is believed that in 2006,
out of the total investment funds inflow, 60 % remained unutilized. These trends could further
intensify the dollar shortage faced by the country, on account of hoarding by companies
expecting the dong to depreciate. Thus the need of the hour for the government is to plan and
implement policies and infrastructure development, which will restore investor confidence in
Vietnam’s capability to absorb the incoming funds.
The following are some of the important factors, which make international HRM complex and
challenging:
CULTURAL DIFFERENCES
Besides the tenancy of employment, there are several conditions of employment the
differences of which cause significant challenge to international HRM.
The system of rewards, promotion, incentives and motivation, system of labour welfare
and social security etc., vary significantly between countries.