Course Evals Fall Day 2019-20 Survey Florida Southern College

2019 DF FSC

Course: ART 1110 001 - INTRODUCTION TO FILM Department: VisArtDes

Responsible Faculty: Matthew Herbertz Responses / Expected: 11 / 22 (50%)
Focus: Overall Results
ART 1110 - 001
Course Evaluations
Responses Course
M F N
Q1 Gender 4 7 11

Responses: [M] Male [F] Female

ART 1110 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
F S J S O N
Q2 Class Standing 8 0 3 0 0 11

Responses: [F] Freshman [S] Sophomore [J] Junior [S] Senior [O] Other

ART 1110 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
MR MR GER BR SC EI GR N
Q3 Reasons for enrollment: (Select most appropriate) 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 11

Responses: [MR] Major Requirement [MR] Minor Requirement [GER] General Ed Requirement [BR] BA/BS Requirement [SC] Schedule Convenience [EI] Elective/ Interest [GR] Grade Redemption

ART 1110 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
A B C D F N
Q4 Expected Grade 8 3 0 0 0 11

Responses: [A] A [B] B [C] C [D] D [F] F

ART 1110 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
LT2 2HA 3HA 4HA 5HA 6HA O7H N

Q5 I would describe my level of effort/preparation outside this course (e.g., papers, laboratory preparation, study time, project 0 2 6 3 0 0 0 11
development, etc.) as:

Responses: [LT2] Less than 2 hours a week [2HA] 2-3 hours a week [3HA] 3-4 hours a week [4HA] 4-5 hours a week [5HA] 5-6 hours a week [6HA] 6-7 hours a week [O7H] Over 7 hours a week

ART 1110 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8OM N
Q6 How many times have you been absent? 6 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 11

Responses: [0] 0 [1] 1 [2] 2 [3] 3 [4] 4 [5] 5 [6] 6 [7] 7 [8OM] 8 or More
Course Evals Fall Day 2019-20 Survey Florida Southern College
2019 DF FSC

Course: ART 1110 001 - INTRODUCTION TO FILM Department: VisArtDes

Responsible Faculty: Matthew Herbertz Responses / Expected: 11 / 22 (50%)
Matthew Herbertz
Course Evaluations - Other Responses Individual

AA MA SA N SD MD AD N Mean Med. Mode Std

Dev

Q1 Based on available technology for this course, the professor effectively applied technology to the course 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 6.73 7 7 .62
material.
Q2 The course significantly increased my knowledge of the subject. 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.82 7 7 .39

Responses: [AA] Absolutely Agree=7 [MA] Mostly Agree=6 [SA] Slightly Agree=5 [N] Neutral=4 [SD] Slightly Disagree=3 [MD] Mostly Disagree=2 [AD] Absolutely Disagree=1

Matthew Herbertz
Course Evaluations - The Professor Responses Individual

AA MA SA N SD MD AD N Mean Med. Mode Std

Dev
Q3 The professor demonstrated clear understanding of the subject matter. 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.91 7 7 .29
Q4 The professor was well prepared for class. 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.73 7 7 .45
Q5 The professor effectively facilitated engaged learning in the course. 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 11 6.64 7 7 .64

Q6 The professor clearly communicated student learning outcomes or course objectives (as seen in my syllabus) 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 11 6.36 6 6,7 .64
that were expected of me.
Q7 The professor’s standards for evaluating my work were clearly communicated. 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 11 6.55 7 7 .66
Q8 The professor’s standards for evaluating my work were consistently applied. 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 11 6.55 7 7 .66
Q9 The professor provided feedback on course assignments and other evaluations (e.g., exams) in a timely 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 11 6.64 7 7 .64
manner.
Q10 The professor challenged me to think critically and/or creatively about material in the course. 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.91 7 7 .29
Q11 The professor enabled my understanding of applying material Beyond the classroom. 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.73 7 7 .45
Q12 The professor encouraged me to improve throughout the course. 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.64 7 7 .48
Q13 The professor was receptive to student opinions (outside his/her own) throughout the course. 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.91 7 7 .29
Q14 The professor made an effort to be available outside of class. 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 7.00 7 7 0
Q15 Based on the course experience, I would take another course with this professor. 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.91 7 7 .29
Q16 Based on the quality of teaching, I would recommend this professor to other students. 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 6.82 7 7 .39

Responses: [AA] Absolutely Agree=7 [MA] Mostly Agree=6 [SA] Slightly Agree=5 [N] Neutral=4 [SD] Slightly Disagree=3 [MD] Mostly Disagree=2 [AD] Absolutely Disagree=1

Faculty: Matthew Herbertz

Question: Is there anything you would like to add?
Response Rate: 36.36% (4 of 11)

1 We spent lots of time in the text book which was good for learning, however, I feel like having to submit a 250 word response before each class should not have been
needed, perhaps shorter. 
2 There was a lot of information. Maybe a little too much to digest in one semester. 
3 There is a lot of work for an intro-level course, but it does set you up well for higher-level classwork later on. 
4 Professor Herbertz is so passionate about what he does and receptive to giving students hands-on experience. It has been an absolute pleasure taking this course! 
Course Evals Fall Day 2019-20 Survey Florida Southern College
2019 DF FSC

Course: ART 2215 001 - STORYTELLING FOR THE SCREEN Department: VisArtDes
Responsible Faculty: Matthew Herbertz Responses / Expected: 16 / 20 (80%)
Focus: Overall Results
ART 2215 - 001
Course Evaluations
Responses Course
M F N
Q1 Gender 10 6 16

Responses: [M] Male [F] Female

ART 2215 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
F S J S O N
Q2 Class Standing 0 1 11 3 0 15

Responses: [F] Freshman [S] Sophomore [J] Junior [S] Senior [O] Other

ART 2215 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
MR MR GER BR SC EI GR N
Q3 Reasons for enrollment: (Select most appropriate) 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 16

Responses: [MR] Major Requirement [MR] Minor Requirement [GER] General Ed Requirement [BR] BA/BS Requirement [SC] Schedule Convenience [EI] Elective/ Interest [GR] Grade Redemption

ART 2215 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
A B C D F N
Q4 Expected Grade 8 7 1 0 0 16

Responses: [A] A [B] B [C] C [D] D [F] F

ART 2215 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
LT2 2HA 3HA 4HA 5HA 6HA O7H N
Q5 I would describe my level of effort/preparation outside this course (e.g., papers, laboratory preparation, study time, project 0 0 6 6 1 2 1 16
development, etc.) as:

Responses: [LT2] Less than 2 hours a week [2HA] 2-3 hours a week [3HA] 3-4 hours a week [4HA] 4-5 hours a week [5HA] 5-6 hours a week [6HA] 6-7 hours a week [O7H] Over 7 hours a week

ART 2215 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8OM N
Q6 How many times have you been absent? 7 5 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 16

Responses: [0] 0 [1] 1 [2] 2 [3] 3 [4] 4 [5] 5 [6] 6 [7] 7 [8OM] 8 or More
Course Evals Fall Day 2019-20 Survey Florida Southern College
2019 DF FSC

Course: ART 2215 001 - STORYTELLING FOR THE SCREEN Department: VisArtDes
Responsible Faculty: Matthew Herbertz Responses / Expected: 16 / 20 (80%)
Matthew Herbertz
Course Evaluations - Other Responses Individual

AA MA SA N SD MD AD N Mean Med. Mode Std

Dev

Q1 Based on available technology for this course, the professor effectively applied technology to the course 13 2 1 0 0 0 0 16 6.75 7 7 .56
material.
Q2 The course significantly increased my knowledge of the subject. 11 2 2 0 0 1 0 16 6.31 7 7 1.31

Responses: [AA] Absolutely Agree=7 [MA] Mostly Agree=6 [SA] Slightly Agree=5 [N] Neutral=4 [SD] Slightly Disagree=3 [MD] Mostly Disagree=2 [AD] Absolutely Disagree=1

Matthew Herbertz
Course Evaluations - The Professor Responses Individual

AA MA SA N SD MD AD N Mean Med. Mode Std

Dev
Q3 The professor demonstrated clear understanding of the subject matter. 14 1 0 0 0 1 0 16 6.63 7 7 1.22
Q4 The professor was well prepared for class. 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 16 6.63 7 7 .60
Q5 The professor effectively facilitated engaged learning in the course. 10 2 3 1 0 0 0 16 6.31 7 7 .98

Q6 The professor clearly communicated student learning outcomes or course objectives (as seen in my syllabus) 10 4 0 0 2 0 0 16 6.25 7 7 1.30
that were expected of me.
Q7 The professor’s standards for evaluating my work were clearly communicated. 6 5 2 0 1 1 1 16 5.50 6 7 1.84
Q8 The professor’s standards for evaluating my work were consistently applied. 8 4 3 0 0 1 0 16 6.06 6.5 7 1.30
Q9 The professor provided feedback on course assignments and other evaluations (e.g., exams) in a timely 6 2 3 0 2 2 1 16 5.00 5.5 7 2.06
manner.
Q10 The professor challenged me to think critically and/or creatively about material in the course. 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 16 6.56 7 7 .61
Q11 The professor enabled my understanding of applying material Beyond the classroom. 10 4 1 0 0 1 0 16 6.31 7 7 1.26
Q12 The professor encouraged me to improve throughout the course. 10 4 1 1 0 0 0 16 6.44 7 7 .86
Q13 The professor was receptive to student opinions (outside his/her own) throughout the course. 10 2 3 1 0 0 0 16 6.31 7 7 .98
Q14 The professor made an effort to be available outside of class. 11 4 0 1 0 0 0 16 6.56 7 7 .79
Q15 Based on the course experience, I would take another course with this professor. 11 1 1 1 0 0 2 16 5.88 7 7 2.03
Q16 Based on the quality of teaching, I would recommend this professor to other students. 11 2 1 0 0 0 2 16 6.00 7 7 1.97

Responses: [AA] Absolutely Agree=7 [MA] Mostly Agree=6 [SA] Slightly Agree=5 [N] Neutral=4 [SD] Slightly Disagree=3 [MD] Mostly Disagree=2 [AD] Absolutely Disagree=1

Faculty: Matthew Herbertz

Question: Is there anything you would like to add?
Response Rate: 43.75% (7 of 16)

1 You're a great teacher, keep it up!!! 

This professor is incredible at what he does! I consistently enjoy coming into this class and I always look forward to doing the work for it. I did find that sometimes the
2 due dates felt a bit too close together and were sometimes difficult to squeeze in when waiting for feedback to update the assignments, but overall I think the course
was well rounded and this professor does a great job of being inclusive and understanding with his students and our efforts when the work is done to the best of our
abilities. He always pushes us to be our best and to think more creatively and critically! 
This course was very engaging and the material was interesting. The dynamic between students and professor was good and conversational. However, the pace that the
3 screenplays needed to be pushed out was too rapid, and some students struggled to write good screenplays with the little time given. The second drafts helped, but
more time would've been better. 
4 Professor Herbertz is a great teacher for this subject. I did not previously have a background for screenwriting, but Herbertz did a fantastic job of helping understand the
fundamentals. The feedback he provided on the scripts was very helpful and he was always ready to answer questions and help students. 
5 Needed more time to thoroughly draft scripts. Sometimes felt like students were rushed to write a new script/new draft too often. 
6 He's just the best, and I feel like I'm very lucky to have had him as a professor in the short amount of time that I did. 
7 Great teacher, great guy. 
Course Evals Fall Day 2019-20 Survey Florida Southern College
2019 DF FSC

Course: ART 3999 001 - GENDER IN FILM Department: VisArtDes

Responsible Faculty: Matthew Herbertz Responses / Expected: 2 / 5 (40%)
Focus: Overall Results
ART 3999 - 001
Course Evaluations
Responses Course
M F N
Q1 Gender 1 1 2

Responses: [M] Male [F] Female

ART 3999 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
F S J S O N
Q2 Class Standing 0 0 2 0 0 2

Responses: [F] Freshman [S] Sophomore [J] Junior [S] Senior [O] Other

ART 3999 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
MR MR GER BR SC EI GR N
Q3 Reasons for enrollment: (Select most appropriate) 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Responses: [MR] Major Requirement [MR] Minor Requirement [GER] General Ed Requirement [BR] BA/BS Requirement [SC] Schedule Convenience [EI] Elective/ Interest [GR] Grade Redemption

ART 3999 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
A B C D F N
Q4 Expected Grade 2 0 0 0 0 2

Responses: [A] A [B] B [C] C [D] D [F] F

ART 3999 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
LT2 2HA 3HA 4HA 5HA 6HA O7H N

Q5 I would describe my level of effort/preparation outside this course (e.g., papers, laboratory preparation, study time, project 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
development, etc.) as:

Responses: [LT2] Less than 2 hours a week [2HA] 2-3 hours a week [3HA] 3-4 hours a week [4HA] 4-5 hours a week [5HA] 5-6 hours a week [6HA] 6-7 hours a week [O7H] Over 7 hours a week

ART 3999 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8OM N
Q6 How many times have you been absent? 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

Responses: [0] 0 [1] 1 [2] 2 [3] 3 [4] 4 [5] 5 [6] 6 [7] 7 [8OM] 8 or More
Course Evals Fall Day 2019-20 Survey Florida Southern College
2019 DF FSC

Course: ART 3999 001 - GENDER IN FILM Department: VisArtDes

Responsible Faculty: Matthew Herbertz Responses / Expected: 2 / 5 (40%)
Matthew Herbertz
Course Evaluations - Other Responses Individual
AA MA SA N SD MD AD N Mean Med. Mode Std
Dev
Q1 Based on available technology for this course, the professor effectively applied technology to the course material. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50
Q2 The course significantly increased my knowledge of the subject. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50

Responses: [AA] Absolutely Agree=7 [MA] Mostly Agree=6 [SA] Slightly Agree=5 [N] Neutral=4 [SD] Slightly Disagree=3 [MD] Mostly Disagree=2 [AD] Absolutely Disagree=1

Matthew Herbertz
Course Evaluations - The Professor Responses Individual

AA MA SA N SD MD AD N Mean Med. Mode Std

Dev
Q3 The professor demonstrated clear understanding of the subject matter. 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.00 6 6 0
Q4 The professor was well prepared for class. 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 5.50 5.5 5,6 .50
Q5 The professor effectively facilitated engaged learning in the course. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50

Q6 The professor clearly communicated student learning outcomes or course objectives (as seen in my syllabus) 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 6.00 6 5,7 1
that were expected of me.
Q7 The professor’s standards for evaluating my work were clearly communicated. 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.00 6 6 0
Q8 The professor’s standards for evaluating my work were consistently applied. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50
Q9 The professor provided feedback on course assignments and other evaluations (e.g., exams) in a timely manner. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50
Q10 The professor challenged me to think critically and/or creatively about material in the course. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50
Q11 The professor enabled my understanding of applying material Beyond the classroom. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50

Q12 The professor encouraged me to improve throughout the course. 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.00 6 6 0

Q13 The professor was receptive to student opinions (outside his/her own) throughout the course. 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 5.50 5.5 5,6 .50
Q14 The professor made an effort to be available outside of class. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50
Q15 Based on the course experience, I would take another course with this professor. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50
Q16 Based on the quality of teaching, I would recommend this professor to other students. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 6.00 6 5,7 1

Responses: [AA] Absolutely Agree=7 [MA] Mostly Agree=6 [SA] Slightly Agree=5 [N] Neutral=4 [SD] Slightly Disagree=3 [MD] Mostly Disagree=2 [AD] Absolutely Disagree=1
Course Evals Fall Day 2019-20 Survey Florida Southern College
2019 DF FSC

Course: COM 2500 001 - VISUAL COMMUNICATION Department: Com

Responsible Faculty: Matthew Herbertz Responses / Expected: 10 / 19 (52.63%)
Focus: Overall Results
COM 2500 - 001
Course Evaluations
Responses Course
M F N
Q1 Gender 3 7 10

Responses: [M] Male [F] Female

COM 2500 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
F S J S O N
Q2 Class Standing 0 2 4 4 0 10

Responses: [F] Freshman [S] Sophomore [J] Junior [S] Senior [O] Other

COM 2500 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
MR MR GER BR SC EI GR N
Q3 Reasons for enrollment: (Select most appropriate) 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 10

Responses: [MR] Major Requirement [MR] Minor Requirement [GER] General Ed Requirement [BR] BA/BS Requirement [SC] Schedule Convenience [EI] Elective/ Interest [GR] Grade Redemption

COM 2500 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
A B C D F N
Q4 Expected Grade 8 2 0 0 0 10

Responses: [A] A [B] B [C] C [D] D [F] F

COM 2500 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
LT2 2HA 3HA 4HA 5HA 6HA O7H N

Q5 I would describe my level of effort/preparation outside this course (e.g., papers, laboratory preparation, study time, project 0 1 3 3 2 1 0 10
development, etc.) as:

Responses: [LT2] Less than 2 hours a week [2HA] 2-3 hours a week [3HA] 3-4 hours a week [4HA] 4-5 hours a week [5HA] 5-6 hours a week [6HA] 6-7 hours a week [O7H] Over 7 hours a week

COM 2500 - 001

Course Evaluations
Responses Course
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8OM N
Q6 How many times have you been absent? 2 2 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 10

Responses: [0] 0 [1] 1 [2] 2 [3] 3 [4] 4 [5] 5 [6] 6 [7] 7 [8OM] 8 or More
Course Evals Fall Day 2019-20 Survey Florida Southern College
2019 DF FSC

Course: COM 2500 001 - VISUAL COMMUNICATION Department: Com

Responsible Faculty: Matthew Herbertz Responses / Expected: 10 / 19 (52.63%)
Matthew Herbertz
Course Evaluations - Other Responses Individual

AA MA SA N SD MD AD N Mean Med. Mode Std

Dev

Q1 Based on available technology for this course, the professor effectively applied technology to the course 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 6.70 7 7 .46
material.
Q2 The course significantly increased my knowledge of the subject. 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 10 6.60 7 7 .66

Responses: [AA] Absolutely Agree=7 [MA] Mostly Agree=6 [SA] Slightly Agree=5 [N] Neutral=4 [SD] Slightly Disagree=3 [MD] Mostly Disagree=2 [AD] Absolutely Disagree=1

Matthew Herbertz
Course Evaluations - The Professor Responses Individual
AA MA SA N SD MD AD N Mean Med. Mode Std
Dev
Q3 The professor demonstrated clear understanding of the subject matter. 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 6.90 7 7 .30
Q4 The professor was well prepared for class. 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 6.80 7 7 .60
Q5 The professor effectively facilitated engaged learning in the course. 5 2 2 0 0 1 0 10 5.90 6.5 7 1.51

Q6 The professor clearly communicated student learning outcomes or course objectives (as seen in my syllabus) 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 10 6.70 7 7 .64
that were expected of me.
Q7 The professor’s standards for evaluating my work were clearly communicated. 6 3 0 1 0 0 0 10 6.40 7 7 .92
Q8 The professor’s standards for evaluating my work were consistently applied. 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 6.50 6.5 6,7 .50

Q9 The professor provided feedback on course assignments and other evaluations (e.g., exams) in a timely 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 6.70 7 7 .46
manner.
Q10 The professor challenged me to think critically and/or creatively about material in the course. 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 6.70 7 7 .46
Q11 The professor enabled my understanding of applying material Beyond the classroom. 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 6.70 7 7 .46
Q12 The professor encouraged me to improve throughout the course. 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 6.70 7 7 .46
Q13 The professor was receptive to student opinions (outside his/her own) throughout the course. 5 3 1 1 0 0 0 10 6.20 6.5 7 .98
Q14 The professor made an effort to be available outside of class. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 7.00 7 7 0
Q15 Based on the course experience, I would take another course with this professor. 7 0 1 1 0 1 0 10 6.00 7 7 1.67
Q16 Based on the quality of teaching, I would recommend this professor to other students. 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 10 6.30 7 7 1.49

Responses: [AA] Absolutely Agree=7 [MA] Mostly Agree=6 [SA] Slightly Agree=5 [N] Neutral=4 [SD] Slightly Disagree=3 [MD] Mostly Disagree=2 [AD] Absolutely Disagree=1

Faculty: Matthew Herbertz

Question: Is there anything you would like to add?
Response Rate: 40.00% (4 of 10)

1 Such a great class i learned so much here. This should really be a prerequisite class for the graphic design kids to teach them how to use adobe. 
Overall, I think this class was a good continuation of Media Foundations. The class was in the same format and included similar topics, but I definitely learned some
new programs and many new design skills. My main issue with the class was that the students in it had a very wide range of design abilities. It ranged from people who
had never opened Photoshop before to one student who was a senior graphic design major. I feel like this huge discrepancy in ability levels made peer evaluations and
group projects more difficult than Media Foundations. When completing peer-evaluations, I felt like I needed to take people's skill levels into account before critiquing
2 their work. In group projects, I found it difficult if one person was at a much higher level than me and they breezed through an assignment without me having a chance to
learn. On the other hand, if I was at a higher skill level than someone else than it felt like I was being held back or could not honestly critique their choices because of
the fact that they had simply never learned something that I knew. I think adding prerequisites for the course would be an effective and simple way to solve this
problem. I think Professor Herbertz did a good job teaching the course. He started teaching here around the same time that my class began and I can tell how much he
has improved as a professor over the past couple of years. One of my favorite things that we did in the course was using Adobe XD to create an app, so that is
something that I definitely think should be continued in the following semesters. 
3 Compared to my previous experience, I can already see the advancements I've made in my design capabilities. I enjoyed the "project-based" curriculum as it allowed me
to apply readings rather than simply being lectured on them. I think the projects were very well spread out and expectations were made clearly. 
Based on the technology and programs used for the duration of this course, there should be a prerequisite for this course that effectively teaches students how to use
4 adobe programs. This course had an expectation of students being able to efficiently use certain programs that I had very little exposure to and had to learn alongside
the material our professor was teach and requiring of us. 