Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment Set-1: Q.1 Discuss Is Auditing Is A Luxury Ans
Assignment Set-1: Q.1 Discuss Is Auditing Is A Luxury Ans
Q.1
Discuss Is Auditing is a luxury
Ans:
The general definition of an audit is an evaluation of a person, organization, system, process,
enterprise, project or product. The term most commonly refers to audits in accounting, but similar
concepts also exist in project management, quality management, and energy conservation.
Auditing is actually a part of Accounting. It is a specialized area that deals with the examination and
review of the accounting records mainly, to find out the effectiveness of the accounting internal
control systems and procedures and also, management policies and practices. In short not only
finding errors and fraud, but to effectively assist management to avoid or reduce such occurrences.
We have internal auditors (co. employees ) and external auditors ( generally CPA's ) with the
objective of forming an independent opinion as to the fairness, and consistency of the Statements of
operation and condition of the company.
Based on above informations, we can therefore conclude that Accounting, with Auditing systems is
necessary in business and guides management in the effective implementation of its policies and
procedures for the success of the company.
Accounting is the language of business used to display an entity's (person or company) financial
status through various financial statements and analysis reports.
Auditing is the evaluation of the above mentioned statements and reports within order to ensure
that they are fair and no overstatements hold been made.
Auditing is a "luxury" because it is with the sole purpose a "double-check" of sorts, making sure that
the accounting has been done correctly and honestly. That's why only a few select
people/companies will be audited each year... it is not needed and would consume way too much
time and money if EVERYONE were to be audited.
Ex. Fred owns a trunk company. An accountant goes through his records and creates different
financial statements and reports exhibiting his worth, his assets, his profitability, etc. (this is the
process of accounting) Then, these statements and reports are submitted to banks, referred to in
import tax reports, handed out to shareholders, etc. SOMETIMES, after these decisions enjoy been
made, an audit may be issued. If so, an auditor would contact Fred and ask for the records that his
accountant used and ensure that his chronicles do not contradict what he reported on his
statements and reports.
Audits are performed to ascertain the validity and reliability of information; also to provide an
assessment of a system's internal control. The goal of an audit is to express an opinion on the person
/ organization / system (etc) in question, under evaluation based on work done on a test basis.
Due to practical constraints, an audit seeks to provide only reasonable assurance that the
statements are free from material error. Hence, statistical sampling is often adopted in audits. In the
case of financial audits, a set of financial statements are said to be true and fair when they are free
of material misstatements - a concept influenced by both quantitative (numerical) and qualitative
factors.
Auditing is a vital part of accounting. Traditionally, audits were mainly associated with gaining
information about financial systems and the financial records of a company or a business (see
financial audit). However, recent auditing has begun to include non-financial subject areas, such as
safety, security, information systems performance, and environmental concerns. With nonprofit
organizations and government agencies, there has been an increasing need for performance audits,
examining their success in satisfying mission objectives. As a result, there are now audit
professionals who specialize in security audits, information systems audits, and environmental
audits.
In financial accounting, an audit is an independent assessment of the fairness by which a company's
financial statements are presented by its management. It is performed by competent, independent
and objective person(s) known as auditors or accountants, who then issue an auditor's report based
on the results of the audit.
In cost accounting, it is a process for verifying the cost of manufacturing or producing of any article,
on the basis of accounts measuring the use of material, labour or other items of cost. In simple
words the term, cost audit, means a systematic and accurate verification of the cost accounts and
records, and checking for adherence to the cost accounting objectives. According to the Institute of
Cost and Management Accountants of Pakistan, a cost audit is "an examination of cost accounting
records and verification of facts to ascertain that the cost of the product has been arrived at, in
accordance with principles of cost accounting."[1]
An audit must adhere to generally accepted standards established by governing bodies. These
standards assure third parties or external users that they can rely upon the auditor's opinion on the
fairness of financial statements, or other subjects on which the auditor expresses an opinion.
The Definition for Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 1 by ICAI - "Auditing is the independent
examination of financial information of any entity, whether profit oriented or not, and irrespective
of its size or legal form, when such an examination is conducted with a view to expressing an opinion
thereon."
Integrated audits
In the US, audits of publicly traded companies are governed by rules laid down by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which was established by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Such an audit is called an integrated audit, where auditors, in addition
to an opinion on the financial statements, must also express an opinion on the effectiveness of a
company's internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with PCAOB Auditing Standard No.
5.
There are also new types of integrated auditing becoming available that use unified compliance
material (see the unified compliance section in Regulatory compliance). Due to the increasing
number of regulations and need for operational transparency, organizations are adopting risk-based
audits that can cover multiple regulations and standards from a single audit event. This is a very new
but necessary approach in some sectors to ensure that all the necessary governance requirements
can be met without duplicating effort from both audit and audit hosting resources
Assessments
The purpose of an assessment is to measure something or calculate a value for it. Although the
process producing an assessment may involve an audit by an independent professional, its purpose
is to provide a measurement rather than to express an opinion about the fairness of statements or
quality of performance.
As a general rule, audits should always be an independent evaluation that will include some degree
of quantitative and qualitative analysis whereas an assessment infers a less independent and more
consultative approach.
Types of auditors
Auditors of financial statements can be classified into two categories:
External auditor / Statutory auditor is an independent Public accounting firm engaged by the
client subject to the audit, to express an opinion on whether the company's financial
statements are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. For publicly-
traded companies, external auditors may also be required to express an opinion over the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. External auditors may also be
engaged to perform other agreed-upon procedures, related or unrelated to financial
statements. Most importantly, external auditors, though engaged and paid by the company
being audited, are regarded as independent auditors.
The most used external audit standards are the US GAAS of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants; and the ISA International Standards on Auditing developed by the International
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the International Federation of Accountants
Internal auditors are employed by the organization they audit. They perform various audit
procedures, primarily related to procedures over the effectiveness of the company's internal
controls over financial reporting. Due to the requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002 for management to also assess the effectiveness of their internal controls
over financial reporting (as also required of the external auditor), internal auditors are
utilized to make this assessment. Though internal auditors are not considered independent
of the company they perform audit procedures for, internal auditors of publicly-traded
companies are required to report directly to the board of directors, or a sub-committee of
the board of directors, and not to management, so to reduce the risk that internal auditors
will be pressured to produce favorable assessments.
The most used Internal Audit standards are those of the Institute of Internal Auditors.
Consultant auditors are external personnel contracted by the firm to perform an audit
following the firm's auditing standards. This differs from the external auditor, who follows
their own auditing standards. The level of independence is therefore somewhere between
the internal auditor and the external auditor. The consultant auditor may work
independently, or as part of the audit team that includes internal auditors. Consultant
auditors are used when the firm lacks sufficient expertise to audit certain areas, or simply for
staff augmentation when staff are not available.
Quality auditors may be consultants or employed by the organization.
Q.2
What is the position of the Auditor in relation with Internal Control?
Ans:
In accounting and auditing, internal control is defined as a process effected by an organization's
structure, work and authority flows, people and management information systems, designed to help
the organization accomplish specific goals or objectives.[1] It is a means by which an organization's
resources are directed, monitored, and measured. It plays an important role in preventing and
detecting fraud and protecting the organization's resources, both physical (e.g., machinery and
property) and intangible (e.g., reputation or intellectual property such as trademarks). At the
organizational level, internal control objectives relate to the reliability of financial reporting, timely
feedback on the achievement of operational or strategic goals, and compliance with laws and
regulations. At the specific transaction level, internal control refers to the actions taken to achieve a
specific objective (e.g., how to ensure the organization's payments to third parties are for valid
services rendered.) Internal control procedures reduce process variation, leading to more
predictable outcomes. Internal control is a key element of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
of 1977 and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, which required improvements in internal control in
United States public corporations. Internal controls within business entities are also referred to as
operational controls.
Internal auditing activity is primarily directed at improving internal control. Under the COSO
Framework, internal control is broadly defined as a process, effected by an entity's board of
directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the achievement of objectives in the following internal control categories:
Effectiveness and efficiency of operations.
Reliability of financial reporting.
Compliance with laws and regulations.
Management is responsible for internal control. Managers establish policies and processes to help
the organization achieve specific objectives in each of these categories. Internal auditors perform
audits to evaluate whether the policies and processes are designed and operating effectively and
provide recommendations for improvement.
In the United States, internal auditors may assist management with compliance with the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act (SOX).
Relationship between Statutory Auditor and internal Auditor:
The function of an internal auditor being an integral part of the system of internal control, it is
obligatory for a statutory auditor to examine the scope, independence and effectiveness of the work
carried out by the internal auditor. CARO, 2004 also requires the statutory auditor to comment on
the internal audit system.
Though the roles and primary objectives of internal and statutory audit differs, some of their means
of achieving their respective objectives are similar. Thus, much of the work of the internal auditor
may be useful to the statutory auditor in determining the nature, timing and extent of his audit
procedures. Depending upon such evaluation, the statutory auditor may be able to adopt less
extensive procedures.
If the statutory auditor is satisfied on an examination of the work of the internal auditor, that the
internal audit has been efficient and effective, he may accept the checking/evaluation carried out by
the internal auditor in the area of internal control, verification of assets and liabilities etc.
It must however be mentioned that the area of co-operation between the statutory and internal
auditor is limited by the fact that both owe their allegiance to separate authorities, the shareholders
in the case of statutory auditor and the management in the case of internal auditor.
Internal auditor should check if there are any proper internal control is in place within the
organization. This is a continous activity since the business environment changes. The internal
controls varies for each department e.g. Procurement, sales, collections, payables, accounting,
financial, recruitment etc.
The auditor should review there are sufficient control in all the areas of the organization and if there
are insufficient controls, the same needs to reported in the audit report. If the internal control is
weak and affects the financial position of the organization then the auditor can qualify the report
also.
Q.3
Write the Guidelines for internal check for Sales Counter?
Ans:
Internal Check is an arrangement of staff duties whereby no one person is allowed to carry through
and record every aspect of transactions so that without collusion between two or more persons,
fraud is prevented and at the same time the possibilities of errors is reduced to a minimum.
Internal Check is a system or method introduced with defined instructions given to staff as to their
sphere of work with a view to control and verification of their work and also maintenance of
accurate records as the ultimate aim.
To allocate duties and responsibilities to every clerk in such a way that he may be held
responsible for a particular error or fraud.
To minimise the possibilities of errors, frauds or irregularities.
To detect errors or frauds if they are already committed by the clerks.
To enhance the efficiency of clerks in a business.
To distribute work in such a way that no business transaction is left unrecorded.
To ensure that the accounts produce reliable and adequate information.
To exercise moral pressure over staff
Accounting procedure or physical control to safeguard assets against loss due to fraud or other
irregularities. Internal check is an element of Internal Control. Weak internal check mechanisms
mandate a greater degree of auditing procedures. An example of internal control is segregating the
record keeping for an asset and its physical custody, such as in the case with inventory and cash. No
one individual should have complete control over a transaction from beginning to end. Internal
checks make it difficult for an employee to steal cash or other assets and concurrently cover up by
entering corresponding amounts in the accounts. An example of internal check is the establishment
of input and output controls within a data processing department. A group or person has the
responsibility of checking control totals provided by the user department with those generated
during the processing of the data. Examples of physical controls are guards and gates to restrict
access.
The internal audit committee is required to maintain a file which will include the following as
evidence of the work: -
Copy of financial statements – including the breakopen schedule, canteen gross schedule,
and notes to the financial statements.
Copy of the budget
Copy of trial balance
Copies of the December bank reconciliation for every bank account
Accounts receivable listing that agrees to the financial statements
Copy of inventory working paper that agrees to the financial statements
Copy of working papers that shows prepaid expenses (including early bird per capita) that
agrees to the financial statements
Copy of accounts payable listing that agrees to the general ledger
Copy of working paper that shows the deferred per capita that agrees to the general ledger
Copy of PST reconciliation and GST reconciliation – verification that the formulas were
reviewed. This is key as GST changed this year to 6%
Copy of wage reconciliation agreement to T4 Summary
A copy of invoices of capital asset purchases with a copy of the general meeting minutes
approving the purchase
A copy of any renovation expenditures that totalled over $5,000 with a copy of the Branch
Advisory approval.
3. Co-Ordination
Coordination is a principle of internal check. All departmental managers are bound to coordinates
with other in order to achieve organization objectives. When there is fault in one department, the
work of other department suffers. The objectives cannot be achieved. Internal check determines the
degree of coordination among the managers.
4. Rotation of Duties
Rotation of duties is a principle of internal check. The workers feel bore by doing the same work
from year to year. There is a need of rotation of duties. It is in the interest of concern as well as
employees. The efficiency is improved due to changes is duties.
5. Recreation Leave
The recreation leave is a principle of internal check. The employee can check recreation leave. It is
necessary for mental health. He can commit fraud as the new employee in his place can disclosed
teh matter. The internal check system can work in the interest of business. The weakness is of one
person is disclosed due to leave.
6. Responsibility
The responsibility is a principle of internal check. The employee can enjoy recreation leave. It is
necessary for mental health. He can enjoy recreation leave. It is necessary for mental health. He
cannot commit fraud as the new employee in his place can disclose the matter. There internal check
system can work in the interest of business. The weakness in of one person is disclosed due to leave.
7. Automatic Machines
The principles of internal check is that machines must be used to do accounting work if permissible.
The machines can do a lot work without delay. The changes of fraud and error are reduced to a
minimum. The working of machines improves efficiency of accounting staff.
8. Checking
The principle of internal check is to check the work of other employees. Many persons perform the
work. The officers can put his signatures to verify the work done by his subordinate. In this way one
work passes many hands. The changes of error and fraud are minimized due to checking and counter
checking.
9. Simple
The principle of internal check is simples in working the employees can understand the working of
internal check system. A person can work under the supervision of other employees. The line of
authority moves from top to bottom level. All workers can understand their duties in the
organization.
10. Documents Classification
The classification of documents is the principles of internal check. The business documents are
prepared, collected, recorded and placed in proper files. The index is prepared to compile the data.
The filing system is useful to place the latter. In case of need the documents are traced at once.
11. Dependent Work
Dependent work is a principle of internal check. The work of one employee is dependent upon
others. One work passes in the hand of two or three persons till it is complete. Another person
checks the passes done by one person. No person is all in all to start and complete the transactions.
12. Harmony
The principles of internal check are harmony among the employees and departments. The
understanding is essential for business goals. The management is to achieve other social and
national objectives. The harmony is basis for successful internal check.
Assignment Set- 2
Q1.
Explain the meaning of flow chart. Explain different types of flow chart
Ans:
A flowchart is a type of diagram, that represents an algorithm or process, showing the steps as boxes
of various kinds, and their order by connecting these with arrows. This diagrammatic representation
can give a step-by-step solution to a given problem. Data is represented in these boxes, and arrows
connecting them represent flow / direction of flow of data. Flowcharts are used in analyzing,
designing, documenting or managing a process or program in various fields.
A flow chart is a graphical or symbolic representation of a process. Each step in the process is
represented by a different symbol and contains a short description of the process step. The flow
chart symbols are linked together with arrows showing the process flow direction.
Examples
Uses
Flowcharts are used in mapping computer algorithms. However, with computer advancement in the
1970s, physical flowcharts lost some significance because programming languages made the process
easier. It is common for a business to use a flowchart in the development of new systems or
software, but most often its via flowchart software. A good example is DrawAnywhere that can be
used online without downloading software. You can also buy software such as Visio or SmartDraw,
which offer more options.
Q.2
What are the mandatory standards of ICAI?
Ans:
Types of Standards issued by ICAI Auditing and Assurance Standards issued by the ICAI include the
following Standards:
Auditing and Assurance Standards(AAS)
Statements on Auditing
General Clarifications on AAS
Guidance Notes
Technical Guides
Each of them has different scope and authority attached to them.
Authority Attached to Standards Authority attached to AAS, Statements on Auditing and General
Clarifications on AAS Auditing and Assurance Standards, Statements on Auditing and General
Clarifications on AAS are mandatory in nature. AAS codify the existing best practices in the area of
auditing. AASs are critical for the proper discharge of functions as auditor. Statements on Audit are
issued for compliance by Members. General Clarifications to AAS are also issued in matters where
doubts exist. Accordingly, while discharging their attest function, it will be the duty of the members
of the ICAI to ensure that these are followed in the audit of financial information covered by their
audit reports.
The nature of these Standards requires members to exercise professional judgment in applying
them, for example, a member may judge it necessary to depart from an essential procedure laid
down in these Standards to achieve more effectively the objective of the engagement.
If, for any reason, a member has not been able to perform an audit in accordance with such
Standards, his report should draw attention to the material departures there from.
Authority Attached to Guidance Notes
Guidance Notes are designed primarily to provide guidance to members on matters which may arise
in the course of their professional work and on which they may desire assistance in resolving issues
which may pose difficulty.
shall be mandatory with effect from period commencing on or after 1st April 2010 for being
applied for the preparation and certification of General Purpose Cost Accounting Statements. Since
there is no statutory requirement for the application of such Cost Accounting Standards for the
preparation and certification of Cost Accounting Statements, in case the cost accountant is of the
opinion that the aforesaid standards have not been complied with for the preparation of the Cost
Statements, it shall be his duty to make a suitable disclosure/qualification in his audit
report/certificate”
Q.3
What is SOX? Explain the main features of SOX.
Ans:
The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the 'Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act' (in the Senate) and 'Corporate and Auditing Accountability and
Responsibility Act' (in the House) and commonly called Sarbanes–Oxley, Sarbox or SOX, is a United
States federal law enacted on July 30, 2002, which set new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public
company boards, management and public accounting firms. It is named after sponsors U.S. Senator
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) and U.S. Representative Michael G. Oxley (R-OH).
The bill was enacted as a reaction to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals including
those affecting Enron, Tyco International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom. These
scandals, which cost investors billions of dollars when the share prices of affected companies
collapsed, shook public confidence in the nation's securities markets.
It does not apply to privately held companies. The act contains 11 titles, or sections, ranging from
additional corporate board responsibilities to criminal penalties, and requires the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement rulings on requirements to comply with the new law.
Harvey Pitt, the 26th chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), led the SEC in the
adoption of dozens of rules to implement the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. It created a new, quasi-public
agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, charged with overseeing,
regulating, inspecting and disciplining accounting firms in their roles as auditors of public companies.
The act also covers issues such as auditor independence, corporate governance, internal control
assessment, and enhanced financial disclosure.
The act was approved by the House by a vote of 421 in favor, 3 opposed, and 8 abstaining and by
the Senate with a vote of 99 in favor, 1 abstaining. President George W. Bush signed it into law,
stating it included "the most far-reaching reforms of American business practices since the time of
Franklin D. Roosevelt."
Debate continues over the perceived benefits and costs of SOX. Supporters contend the legislation
was necessary and has played a useful role in restoring public confidence in the nation's capital
markets by, among other things, strengthening corporate accounting controls. Opponents of the bill
claim it has reduced America's international competitive edge against foreign financial service
providers, saying SOX has introduced an overly complex regulatory environment into U.S. financial
markets. Proponents of the measure say that SOX has been a "godsend" for improving the
confidence of fund managers and other investors with regard to the veracity of corporate financial
statements.
Overview
Sarbanes-Oxley contains 11 titles that describe specific mandates and requirements for financial
reporting. Each title consists of several sections, summarized below:
• TITLE I – “Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)”
Title I establishes the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), to provide independent
oversight of public accounting firms providing audit services ("auditors"). It also creates a central
oversight board tasked with registering auditors, defining the specific processes and procedures for
compliance audits, inspecting and policing conduct and quality control, and enforcing compliance
with the specific mandates of SOX. Title I consists of nine sections.
TITLE II - “Auditors Independence”
Title II, which consists of nine sections, establishes standards for external auditor independence, to
limit conflicts of interest. It also addresses new auditor approval requirements, audit partner
rotation policy, conflict of interest issues and auditor reporting requirements. Section 201 of this title
restricts auditing companies from doing other kinds of business apart from auditing with the same
clients.
TITLE III - “Corporate Responsibility”
Title III mandates that senior executives take individual responsibility for the accuracy and
completeness of corporate financial reports. It defines the interaction of external auditors and
corporate audit committees, and specifies the responsibility of corporate officers for the accuracy
and validity of corporate financial reports. It enumerates specific limits on the behaviors of
corporate officers and describes specific forfeitures of benefits and civil penalties for non-
compliance. For example, Section 302 implies that the company board (Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer) should certify and approve the integrity of their company financial reports
quarterly. This helps establish accountability. Title III consists of eight sections.
TITLE IV - “Enhanced Financial Disclosures”
Title IV consists of nine sections. It describes enhanced reporting requirements for financial
transactions, including off-balance sheet transactions, pro-forma figures and stock transactions of
corporate officers. It requires internal controls for assuring the accuracy of financial reports and
disclosures, and mandates both audits and reports on those controls. It also requires timely
reporting of material changes in financial condition and specific enhanced reviews by the SEC or its
agents of corporate reports.
TITLE V - “Analyst Conflicts of Interest”
Title V consists of only one section, which includes measures designed to help restore investor
confidence in the reporting of securities analysts. It defines the codes of conduct for securities
analysts and requires disclosure of knowable conflicts of interest.
TITLE VI - “Commission Resources and Authority”
Title VI consists of four sections and defines practices to restore investor confidence in securities
analysts. It also defines the SEC’s authority to censure or bar securities professionals from practice
and defines conditions under which a person can be barred from practicing as a broker, adviser or
dealer.
TITLE VII – “Studies and Reports”
Title VII consists of five sections. These sections 701 to 705 are concerned with conducting research
for enforcing actions against violations by the SEC registrants (companies) and auditors. Studies and
reports include the effects of consolidation of public accounting firms, the role of credit rating
agencies in the operation of securities markets, securities violations and enforcement actions, and
whether investment banks assisted Enron, Global Crossing and others to manipulate earnings and
obfuscate true financial conditions.
TITLE VIII – “Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability”
Title VIII consists of seven sections and it also referred to as the “Corporate and Criminal Fraud Act of
2002.” It describes specific criminal penalties for fraud by manipulation, destruction or alteration of
financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for
whistle-blowers.
TITLE IX – “White Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement”
Title IX consists of two sections. This section is also called the “White Collar Crime Penalty
Enhancement Act of 2002.” This section increases the criminal penalties associated with white-collar
crimes and conspiracies. It recommends stronger sentencing guidelines and specifically adds failure
to certify corporate financial reports as a criminal offense.
TITLE X – “Corporate Tax Returns”
Title X consists of one section. Section 1001 states that the Chief Executive Officer should sign the
company tax return.
TITLE XI – “Corporate Fraud Accountability”
Title XI consists of seven sections. Section 1101 recommends a name for this title as “Corporate
Fraud Accountability Act of 2002” . It identifies corporate fraud and records tampering as criminal
offenses and joins those offenses to specific penalties. It also revises sentencing guidelines and
strengthens their penalties. This enables the SEC to temporarily freeze large or unusual payments.