Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Colin Scott Constance Little English 102: Composition II Section 2359 February 16, 2009
Colin Scott Constance Little English 102: Composition II Section 2359 February 16, 2009
Colin Scott
Constance Little
After the string of well-publicized high school shootings, there were questions
into what exactly drove the students to the deed. Some blamed the media, others the lax
gun laws, and still others the parenting. These may all have contributed, but the one that
was pointed at the most, after the parenting, is the media [ CITATION Don01 \l 1033 ].
While it is possible that the media could have influenced the shooters, there is no
evidence that the mass media could have knowledgably provoked this outcome. Looking
at the habits of the shooters of Columbine in particular, there is a strong case to be made
for there being pre-existing mental defects. Therefore, there could be no way of
predicting the behaviors of the shooters based off their exosure to mass media. Overall, it
is impossible to predict the extreme outcomes of any audience base influenced by the
The Columbine shooting began on the morning of April 20, 1999, when two
students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, opened fire on the general student body. The
massacre lasted 47 minutes, and when the standoff ended with the suicide of the two
shooters, the total body count was thirteen dead, twenty-three wounded. Immediately
afterward, there was a flurry of speculation as to why the shooters did what they did, and
finger pointing as to who was to blame. The usual suspects were called into question,
specifically the common culture that the two were involved with, the music they listened
Scott 2
to, and the parenting of the two. However, there is more to it than just what they listened
to, what they wore, and if they were respectful to their parents. The report commissioned
by Governor Owens goes into depth about the two shooters and their habits.
The two boys were actually decent students. Both held part time jobs, both
scheduled to graduate on time, and both had relatively good grades. They were the model
American boys: both were in Boy Scouts, Little League, and soccer. Harris’ family was
Air Force, and moved frequently, and Klebold was raised in the area. They were both on
good terms with their parents, and both had a significant respect for their parents. In the
videos recovered after the massacre, both boys commented repeatedly that they were
sorry they were doing this to their parents, and that this was the only way. This flies in
the face of the popular theory that the boys were disrespectful and hated their parents.
Not everything was all on the bright side for these two, however. Both had
histories with the authorities, from breaking into an electrician’s van, to hacking the
school’s mainframe. The two had repeatedly expressed an overactive interest in guns,
weapons, and death. The room of Harris yielded a toolbox full of bomb-making sundries,
and both had tested home made explosives outside a local pizzeria, their workplace. They
had also recruited a co-worker to purchase weapons and ammunition for them,
specifically for the assault. Klebold wrote on his public internet page that, “… I swear,
I’m like an outcast, and everyone is conspiring against me… Fact: People are so
Aside from overt things that would flag the students, there was the disturbing
personal life of the two. Both had an avid interest in a game called Doom, where there is
an overdose of killing massive numbers of aliens to hard, driving music. The two also
Scott 3
favored heavy metal music, like Metallica and Pantera. Both bands are known for their
guitars and for their lyrics, which are usually very hard and anti-establishment.
On top of all this, one of the shooters, Harris, was being treated for depression.
Due to patient protection laws, no dosages were disclosed, but due to the nature and
severity of the activities being perpetrated by the two, it is safe to say that the dosages
were higher than normal. Harris was on medication at the time of death, according to the
coroner, and the proper dosage was found in his blood stream. This hints heavily that his
mental defect was aided by an overriding desire to do this deed. Considering all the
previous pursuits of the two, there is also a good case to be made for the other shooter
In the aftermath of the disaster, there was copious finger pointing as to why the
two did what they did. The top three things blamed were, in order, the parents, the media,
and the gun laws. However, looking at them when taking into consideration the pre-
The number one group blamed for the tragedy was the parents. This was the
immediate and overwhelming response from about half of the population [ CITATION
Don01 \l 1033 ]. However, the study found that the groups tested did not consider the
mental health of the shooters to be all that important in blame placement. They basically
wanted someone to play the scapegoat, and the shooters themselves were already dead.
So, the public turned to the next-of-kin: the two’s parents. They arbitrarily blamed those
who were responsible for the moral foundation of the boys, and who ‘obviously’ failed in
that respect. This does not, however, take into consideration the boys themselves. The
parents of Harris realized something was wrong, because they had their son put on anti-
Scott 4
depressants not long before the shootings. The parents only saw one side of their kids,
however. The boys hid their true personalities from their parents, and reveled in the fact.
On the outside, the two were making decent grades, and keeping busy at work. At home,
they were talkative, friendly, and happy. After the massacre, however, police found tapes
of the boys testing different explosives, such as dry-ice bombs, and a few hand made pipe
bombs, and numerous propane bombs. On tape, they also discussed in detail how their
plot had almost been discovered by Harris’ parents, when they confiscated a toolbox with
assorted bomb-making materials. These are not the activities of normal teenagers- these
are the activities of the mentally unstable. It makes sense that the parents would have no
idea that their boys would do such a thing. Why? Because the two wanted desperately to
keep their plans a secret. Their parents thought that everything was normal and healthy,
because they could not see that anything was wrong, or that they were hiding something.
Why would a parent question the apparent good fortune of having a successful son?
In terms of blame, the second most popular was the media. A quarter of those
tested found the next-most important factor in the shooting to be the media, and
specifically the music the two normally listened to [ CITATION Don01 \l 1033 ]. The
mental state of the shooters nullifies the normal rules regarding interpretation of popular
media, from music to fashion. Granted, the boys listened to music that was vengeful,
hateful, and violent. But there are a large number of student-age teens listening to this
these days, and there are, by and large, no regular outbursts like Columbine. This is
because most teens use the music as something to identify with, something to distinguish
one’s self from the masses[ CITATION Rob00 \l 1033 ]. Most teens see the music as an
escape and as something to listen to for release. However, in the case of the two shooters,
Scott 5
there is something more there. It is well documented that they could not find a way to
connect with modern society. One example is the excerpt from the webpage shown
earlier. They both wrote many letters and rants about how they could not fit in, and how
they were outcast. They found something to identify with in the music, specifically the
music that was anti-establishment and anti-government. The only difference was that how
they interpreted it. Most teens use music as a pastime and entertainment. The two boys
obviously took their music as directions to, as Metallica said, “Kill ‘Em All.”
The last party to receive significant amounts of blame is the overly lax gun laws.
This was quite true at the time, as the two talked multiple others into buying guns and
ammunition for them When they went to a local gun show, they had tried to purchase a
gun from a private owner. He refused because they were under age. They brought a
friend to buy for them later that day, and the seller even remarked that, “This time, at
least you brought someone old enough to sign the paperwork.” However, this has been
changed in the years following Columbine, from stiffening penalties for selling to minors
to the fines and jail times for ‘straw man’ purchases, or buying with intent to sell to
minors.
Overall, however, all the blame and fingerpointing can only be traced back to two
people- Harris and Klebold. They are the ones ultimately responsible for their actions.
There is overwhelming proof that the two were not mentally stable, but both of them hid
it well. Harris was even on a full dosage of anti-depressant at the time of death, according
to the coroner’s report. Both had the same upbringing as hundreds of other children in the
US, some better, some worse. Yet from all those, there have been only 35 school
shootings over the period from 1991 to 2001, from hundreds of thousands of schools
Scott 6
[ CITATION JTogy \l 1033 ]. This is by far an atypical event. While there may have been
influence from the media and the gun laws, there is little chance that it stemmed from the
parents. It is also not possible that the actions of two teens, who hid their darkest desires
from their own parents, could have been predicted by those marketing and making the
media the two partook of. Looking at the habits of the shooters of Columbine in
particular, there is a strong case to be made for there being pre-existing mental defects.
Therefore, there could be no way of predicting the behaviors of the shooters based off
their exosure to mass media. Overall, it is impossible to predict the extreme outcomes of
any audience base influenced by the media, especially in the presence of prior mental
anomalies.
Scott 7
Annotated Bibliography
Governor Owens, this is the basis for a lot of the current policy concerning
schools and the handling of an armed threat. It wsa also the basis for a lot of the
Joslyn, D. P.-M. (May, 2001). Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution:
The Conditional Influence of Issue Frames . The Journal of Politics, Vol. 63, No.
Science Association.
Here is one of the reports with the public blame for the Columbine shooting. The
test in question has a basic prompt about who was responsible for the shooting,
and three groups- the control group, the media blame group, and the gun laws
blame group. The results are very interesting, seeing as the answers all reflect the
obvious, and more besides. Only the control group considers the fact that the
shooters may have had mental or emotional problems may have had anything to
do with the massacre. The groups were also monitored based on education,
gender, and political party affiliation. The lesser-educated were more likely to
blame the media, and the more educated were leaning away from that answer.
Toby, J. (May, 2004). Review: Social Control and Law. Contemporary Sociology, Vol.
This piece looks at the research done for the National Research Council, and some
of its shortcomings. Focusing on the statistics present for this research, which are
staggeringly small, the piece brings about the truth of the matter. There are
thousands of schools in the country, but from 1991-2001, there were only 35
school shootings with multiple deaths. This leads to the truth that any analysis of
this atypical event is going to be less than conclusive. It also shows that the
majority of these events happen in rural America, and not in the cities, contrary to
popular belief. From two cases in the country and two cases it the city, the report
is only able to show that the only thing in common between the shooters is that
the environment of the shooters was not enough to cause the event.
Wright, R. (Oct., 2000). 'I'd Sell You Suicide': Pop Music and Moral Panic in the Age of
Marilyn Manson . Popular Music, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 365-385 : Cambridge
University Press .
This looks at the music that is commonly attributed to the younger, more hatful
cultures, summed up by the works of Marilyn Manson. Here, the musician and the
author go into depth about the lyrics, and about the messages behind them.
Manson plainly admits that he tries to be the most obscene of them all, and to be
the most aggressive, over the top performer and person humanly possible, but
reveals that it is all to bring about the liberation of the hypocrisy of the modern
age. He is not trying to get people to take him literally, but to point out, through
gross and blatant hypocrisy, that there are things that need to change, and the way
he states are the way they are being done now, and those ways are decidedly
failing. Through this, he is trying to bring about a revolution to the older days
Scott 9
where, “…[P]eople blushed when you said ‘dick’… Then I wouldn’t be necessary
anymore.”