Student Presentations: Assessment Rubric DM-2020
Student Name(s): __________________________
Research & Analysis
Relevant web resources,
used to understand the case,
analysis of case facts using
theory or models (50%)
Logical flow
Organisation of ideas;
Ability to sustain audience
interest
(20%)
Quality of class discussion
Interaction with audience
(20%)
Student IDs:________________________________________
Not Attempted Score Score Score Score Score
0 0-49 50-64 65-74 75-84 85-100
Not attempted or Minimal application Some application of Frequent application Consistent Consistent and highly
entirely or significantly of research theories research theories to of research theories application of insightful application
plagiarized from other to topic. topic, little or no to topic showing research theories to of research theories to
sources. detail/ explanation. some detail/ topic with detail and topic. Plentiful detail/
explanation. showing some clearly explained.
insight.
Not attempted or Organisation of Organisation of Organisation of Organisation of Organisation of ideas
entirely or significantly ideas not clear. ideas sometimes ideas generally clear. ideas clear. extremely clear.
plagiarized from other Presentation does unclear. Presentation displays Presentation uses a Presentation solidly
sources. not develop audience Presentation displays general use of variety of techniques uses varied and
interest due to poor basic use of techniques (examples / headings innovative engagement
engagement techniques (examples / headings / visuals etc) that are techniques (examples /
techniques. (examples / headings / visuals etc) to used well to sustain headings / visuals etc)
/ visuals etc) to develop audience audience interest. to sustain audience
develop audience interest. interest throughout.
interest.
Not attempted or Audience invited to Basic questions Interesting questions Discussion questions Stimulating and
entirely or significantly ask questions, but asked to forward posed (incl. (incl. questions sustained class
plagiarized from other presentation group discussion and/or questions regarding regarding theory in discussion resulted
sources. does not develop basic answers given theory in light of light of findings / from thoughtful
class discussion to audience findings / analysis) analysis) and/or questions (incl.
beyond mere questions. to audience and/or answers create some questions regarding
summary of helpful answers spontaneous and theory in light of
analysis. given to audience solid discussion. findings / analysis),
questions. and strong group
answers and comments
to audience
contributions.
 Student Presentations: Assessment Rubric DM-2020
Not Attempted Score Score Score Score Score
0 0-49 50-64 65-74 75-84 85-100
Attention to Detail (10%) Not attempted or The problems in one The problems in one Group performance Group performance Group performance in
 Group cohesion/ entirely or significantly or more of the areas or more of the areas in the areas listed in all areas listed all areas listed was of a
synergy plagiarized from other listed prevented listed reduced mostly assisted considerably assisted high quality and
 Clarity of speech / eye sources. audience audience audience audience greatly assisted
contact / pacing & understanding. understanding. understanding. understanding. audience
enthusiasm Group details and/or understanding.
 Visual tools (e.g., references were
Powerpoint slides) absent from visuals.
 Citations and
referencing

Evaluation Notes: