Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2001 Youth Risk 1
2001 Youth Risk 1
Project 4
Marvin Merriweather
Tuskegee University
Abstract
In this paper I will analyze three variables from the data table from the data Risk Behavior
Survey. My variables consisted of sex as my independent variable, the number of first times the
respondent fought in the notated year as my dependents, and my control variable being grade
level of the individual. My Bivariate hypothesis looks closely at the relationship of how the sex
of the respondent affects the amount of times the respondent fought in that year. My multivariate
hypothesis will look at the sex the respondents who fought by grade level.
2001 Youth Risk 3
Hypothesis:
In my bivariate analysis I will look at the correlation between how the sex of the
respondent affects the amount of times the respondent fought in 2001. The independent variable
in the bivariate analysis will be sex of the respondents while my dependent variable will be the
number of times the respondents fought on campus in the year 2001. The control variable will
be the grade levels of the respondents ranging from 9th to the 12th grade.
The multivariate hypothesis that will be analyzed will look at wether the number of
individuals who fought on campus by sex will change due to the different grade level of the
respondent. It will break down the data into categories of male and female respondents as
correlated from grades 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th in the year 2001.
Rationale:
In my bivariate hypothesis, the sex of the respondents correlates with the number of fight
that the respondent had on campus in the 2001 school year. I think that the number of males will
exceed the number of females whom fought on campus in the year 2001 because of the fact that
males tend to be more aggressive in high school levels and feel they have something to prove to
their peers.
the students whom fought on campus in the year 2001 by grade level with the sex broken down
into male and female while the grade levels are broken down into 9th, 10th 11th, and 12th grade
students. I firmly believe that if the demographics of geography as well as race where taken into
Table 1
Sex of R’s
Table 2
Discussion
In my first analysis in the above table one I analyzed a bivariate hypothesis which stated
that the relationship of how the sex of the respondent effects the amount of times the respondent
fought in that year in the youth risk behavior survey data. If we refer to table one, we can see
that the sex of the respondents that were analyzed consisted of male and female respondents.
Looking at the data we can see that the number of females and males whom fought on school
grounds between one to three times in 2001, are closely related, with males having a total of
48.0% of total respondents while females had a total 52.0%. Males increased with the number of
incidents of four to seven fights and eight to eleven fights in a year both with 78% of total
In my multivariate table I looked at the correlation of the sex of the students whom
fought on campus in the year 2001 by grade level, with the sex broken down into male and
female while the grade levels are broken down into 9th, 10th 11th, and 12th grade students. It is
clear to see that that as both males and females fought less as they got to a higher grade, with
43.2% of males in 11th to 12th grade fighting less. This could be due to the level of maturity had
increased amongst the males. Females from grades 11th through 12th also had a significant
Given all information analyzed in my multivariate and bivariate hypothesis it can clearly
be stated that males in high school tend to be more aggressive than their female peers. I think
that it can also be assumed that if other demographics were taken into account such race as well
as geographic location of the school we can assume that certain races maybe more aggressive
due to the type of environment surrounding them. I am a firm believer in a zero tolerance policy
2001 Youth Risk 7
and school systems implement this that could help eliminate the number of cases that result in
References
Appendix
Output
2001 Youth Risk 10
2001 Youth Risk 11
2001 Youth Risk 12
Syntax
2001 Youth Risk 13
Code book
2001 Youth Risk 14