Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Reflection 25321902
Case Reflection 25321902
II.CASE SUMMARY
DIAGNOSIS: -
Mr.” X’’ is a 30 year old married women diagnosed as well
differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of suraglottis locally
advanced (cT4 N3 M0) in nature on August 2019 at our hospital and
during the evaluation. She was planned for Neoadjuvant
chemotherapy followed by definitive radiation. She was unable to
swallow food so she was referred to us for providing enteral feeding
by doing a Feeding jejunostomy (palliative) before starting the
therapy as dysphagia is severe.
The procedure is explained to her and she underwent the above said
procedure in September 2019 under high risk because she was not an
ideal candidate for endotracheal intubation because of the tracheal
compression of the mass. She was explained about the option of
palliative elective tracheostomy because of the compression but she
was not willing to undergo the same as she has no dyspnoea. She was
discharged and review date was advised.
1 cycle of chemotherapy was given with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel .
Suture removal was done on post operative day(POD) 11. By POD 12
she developed burst abdomen with complete rectus dehiscence. She
underwent emergency secondary suturing on the same day.
During the post operative period of the second surgery, her saturations
were not maintaining on room air and even on oxygen. She was
counselled about the need for tracheostmy and underwent the same as
an emergency procedure on POD 2.
INVESTIGATIONS
INVESTIGATIONS DONE REASON WHY THE
INVESTIGATIONS WAS DONE
PHYSICAL CARE: -
Pain- Goal is control pain by assessing pain by the help of the WHO
step ladder for pain control. Palliative care physician had prescribed
Tab Paracetmol 650mg TID, Tab Morphine 10mg TID and Tab
Dexamethosone 4mg OD
PSYCOLOGICAL CARE: -
She has social stigma because of swelling over neck during the initial
visits to our hospital. She is concerned about the family as her
primary care giver is her brother and has no support from her husband
or her other family members during the primary visits. During her
later visits she is concerned regarding feeding jejunostomy on
abdomen. Psychological pain was evident upon with patient
Her brother was also depressed since the diagnosis and the following
events that were needed for the treatment. After counselling session
by the palliative care physician he was able to accept the condition.
During the admission for the emergency procedure of suturing her
husband came. He feels he cant help his wife.
Brother and husband understood that the surgical procedures were to
relieve symptoms and not curative in intent. The primary treatment is
by chemotherapy and radiation. I have explained to the patient and
family members that the disease is non communicable she can do all
his daily activities as usual. Feeding jejunostomy tube and
tracheostomy tube is not at all barriers for his daily activities. In order
to reduce the social stigma of the patient she was advised to keep one
towel on around on neck to cover the tracheostomy tube and to cover
the jejunostomy tube under saree or to wear a full clad while going
into public.
SPIRITUAL CARE: -
She stopped believing on god and family wondered why this
happened to them. She believes prayers will not give any more
relaxation to his but will be going to church to find peace. She was
counselled to accept the disease prognosis and the given treatments
are to bring down symptoms and not to cure the disease.
ETHICAL ISSUES: -
I respected his autonomy but at first the patient rejected to do
tracheostomy and feeding jejunostomy. I and palliative care physician
explained about benefits of having feeding jejunostomy and
tracheostomy as it would help in easing the treatment.
She was accepting for feeding jejunostomy but was still
uncomfortable about the tracheostomy. She was counselled about the
tracheostomy requirement again before being discharged.
Thank you