Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modelling of Aged Cavities For Partialdischarge in Power Cable Insulation
Modelling of Aged Cavities For Partialdischarge in Power Cable Insulation
Modelling of Aged Cavities For Partialdischarge in Power Cable Insulation
Research Article
ISSN 1751-8822
Modelling of aged cavities for partial Received on 22nd July 2014
Accepted on 5th December 2014
discharge in power cable insulation doi: 10.1049/iet-smt.2014.0222
www.ietdl.org
Abstract: In this study, the ageing process of cavities in solid insulation of power cables is divided into three stages, and
for each stage a circuit model is proposed. Each of these circuit models preserves the basic characteristics of the cavity
under the circumstances of the corresponding stage and provides the expected behaviour of generated partial
discharge (PD) pulses. This set of models simulate cavity wall effects, the non-uniformity of internal electrical field and
charge deployed on the wall surfaces with considering the existence of electronegative gases according to the
requirements of the three defined ageing stages. Finally, the simulation results, in the forms of phase resolved PD
patterns are presented showing good agreement with the published experimental measurements drawn from
accelerated ageing process setups.
Table 1 Trends of changes of various parameters during the ageing process of cavity
Physical parameter revolutions PD characteristics
stage1 decrease [17, increase increase not seen [20, 29, streamer decrease decrease turtle-like
18, 34, 35] [1, 19] [19, 36, 37] 37] [20, 22, 38] [17, 21] [17, 21] [17, 18, 23, 35, 39]
stage2 increase [17, increase increase very little [20, townsend increase increase turtle-like to rabbit-like
18, 34, 35] [1, 19] [19, 36, 37] 29, 37] [20, 22, 38] [17, 21] [17, 21] transition [17, 18, 23,
35, 39]
stage3 decrease [17, increase curve saturation gradual erosion townsend to increase (slow decrease (slow rabbit-like to bulgy
18, 34, 35] [1, 19] region [19, 36, 37] [18, 20, 29, 37] glow and slope) [17, 21] slope) [17, 21] turtle-like transition [17,
pitting [20, 29, 18, 23, 35, 39]
38]
*
Owing to time evolution of gas moles during the ageing period, ideal gas law is not satisfied and no direct relation between pressure and temperature exists.
Fig. 1 Basic model for PD analyses on the signals at PD source location (left) and at cable ends (right)
Fig. 2 Schematic illustration of cavity in cable insulation (left) and its model regarding cavity surface (right)
Fig. 3 Schematic illustration of eroded cavity surface (left) and its corresponding sphere–plane configuration (right)
2-1 increase of enclosed change in closing and opening criteria 3-1 decrease of enclosed change in closing and opening criteria
gas pressure of the switch according to the gas pressure of the switch according to the
corresponding relations in Table 7 corresponding relations in Table 7
2-2 decrease of enclosed change the value of RVoid according to 3-2 roughness of void change the value of CVoid according
gas conductivity the corresponding relation in Table 7 surface to (8)
2-3 increase of void surface keep the RC branch standing for the 3-3 decrease of mobility of use time-dependent Beta function
conductivity cavity surface free electrons defined by (9)
Fig. 5 PRPD pattern of four snapshots (a to d) during the second stage (while in each case slight increments in gas pressure, decrements in gas conductivities
and increments in surface conductivities, along with β function changes according to Appendix 2, have been considered)
Fig. 7 PRPD pattern of the first ageing stage for different cavity sizes, (left) 400 μm and (right) 800 μm
Fig. 8 PRPD pattern of the second ageing stage for different cavity depths, (left) 50% and (right) 80% of insulation thickness from core
Table 6 Input data being applied to the cavity. Therefore, PD repetition rate increases,
which agrees with the experimental results of [17, 21].
Parameters Values
10 l c tc
CVoid Cvoid = ·
ln rcond + dc + rc /2 / rcond + dc − rc /2 (rcond + dc )
⎧ ⎫
⎨ ln (Ṅ pu ) · (t − t )pu b ⎬
probability function to model P (t) = 1 − exp − surf b
f − eE/(4p10 )
stochastic delay in discharges ⎩ a ⎭ pu
Ṅ surf = Ne .n0 . exp −
t
· exp −
t KT
α and β are Weibull parameters other parameters have
been defined in [15]
d √
breakdown voltage Vbd = 2.1 rc + 2.42rc δ = 295( p/T ) other parameters have been defined in [15]
kh
gd
residual voltage Vres = 2.42 ·r other parameters have been defined in [15]
kh c