Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Role and Functions of Diplomacy
Role and Functions of Diplomacy
Session 2017-19
Submitted by:
Supervised by:
Imran Wakil
What is Diplomacy?
The term Diplomacy is used in a variety of ways. Sometimes it is
described as “the art of telling lies on behalf of the nation”, or “as
instrument for employing deceit and duplicity in international
relations.”
Definitions:
1 “Diplomacy is the process of representation and negotiation by
which states customarily deal with one another in times of peace.” —
Padelford and Lincoln
Major Functions:
1. Ceremonial/Symbolic Functions:
The diplomats of a nation are the symbolic representatives of the state
and they represent their state and government in all official ceremonies
and functions as well as in non-official, social and cultural functions
held in the place of their postings.
2. Representation:
3. Negotiations:
4 Reporting:
The level of social and cultural conflicts among the people of the host
country and the level of social harmony and cohesion are assessed for
determining the level of stability of the host country. Thus reporting is
an important and valuable function of diplomacy.
5. Protection of Interests:
Old Diplomacy:
Aristocratic:
The Old Diplomacy was aristocratic and hence regarded several well
defined and accepted principles as cardinal principles or virtues of
diplomats. Honesty, integrity, truthfulness, politeness, fairness, strict
conformity to protocol, secrecy and total commitment to national
interests were considered to be the essential qualities of diplomats.
However in actual operation, the Old Diplomacy was characterized by
‘honest lies,’ integrity in appearance, qualified truthfulness, outward
politeness, self- satisfying fairness and strict observance of protocol and
secrecy.
Secrecy:
New Diplomacy has the following salient features which have been
totally different from the features of Old Diplomacy.
The New Diplomacy is truly global in nature and scope. The rise of Asia,
Africa and Latin America and the emergence of a large number of
sovereign independent states changed the character of post-war
international relations. From mostly European relations these came to
be truly international relations involving all the sovereign states.
Consequently, diplomacy had to abandon its European character and to
become truly global in nature and approach.
(ii) New Diplomacy is mostly Multilateral, whereas Old Diplomacy was
mostly Bilateral:
(iv) New Diplomacy is mostly open and Old Diplomacy was mostly
secret:
In New Diplomacy the negotiations are open and the results are,
invariably always, made public soon after the reaching of agreements
or treaties or alliances or settlements. Diplomatic negotiations are
given full coverage over the Radio, Press, Television and other means of
mass-media. Old Diplomacy favored secrecy as its governing principle.
Thus, the features of New Diplomacy are almost entirely different from
the features of Old Diplomacy.
4. General public has neither the ability nor the time to participate
constructively in diplomatic debate that may emerge as a result of
public access to all information regarding diplomatic negotiations.
Thus, there are arguments both for and against Open Diplomacy. Open
Diplomacy is democratic and hence can be helpful in securing
international peace. However, it can lead to unwanted and harmful
popular decisions and reduce efficiency. Secret Diplomacy on the other
hand can be more active and efficient. However, it appears to be
undemocratic in this age of democracy as it can lead to certain
unpopular and aristocratic or elitist negotiations and decisions.
The best way, therefore, can be the middle way— Open Diplomacy in
respect of the facts of treaties, alliances and agreements which a nation
makes with other nations and some Secret Diplomacy in respect of
diplomatic negotiations. The idea is to let the public know what is
considered good for the protection and promotion of national interest.
Sharing of all details and negotiations can have an harmful effect on
relations with other nations and can hinder the process of attainment
of national goals.
Future of Diplomacy: