Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CMS Negotiation - Manual 13 15
CMS Negotiation - Manual 13 15
Course Credits: 02
Course Marks: 20
Course Code:
1. Introduction to the module and module objectives
Most of us spend a good deal of our professional lives engaged in negotiations of one form or
another. Negotiation consists of discussions between two or more parties around specific
issues for the purpose of reaching a mutually satisfactory agreement.
The primary goal of this course is to improve your negotiation skills. There is a distinction
between your skill as a negotiator (practice) and your skill at negotiation (strategy). One can
excel at devising a negotiation strategy even if one is not always the best person to
implement that strategy. The primary purpose of this course is to help you better understand
and develop a strategic approach toward negotiations. Through the use of lectures, case
simulations, role plays , discussion, videos and pod-casts, this course provides students with a
strategic framework for negotiating while also enhancing their ability to maximize joint gains
and neutralize hard bargaining tactics.
2. Module Objectives
b. Learn the phases of negotiations & gain the skills necessary for successful negotiations.
Phone : 9958231495
Email ID : shalini.kakkar@iilmcms.ac.in
2.3 Tutors
d. Students are required to go through the different iTunes podcast and videos suggested
as a per-requisite for the course. The following videos and pod-casts need to be visited
before the commencement of the course.
5. MODULE OVERVIEW
SESSION NO TOPICS
Session 8 Case Bill Nichol Negotiates with Wal-Mart: Hard Bargains over Soft
Goods
6.1 References
Getting to Yes, Fisher, R., W. Ury, and B. Patton, Penguin Books
Negotiation by Lewicki, Saunders and Barey
Global Business Negotiations, Cellich and Jain
International Management: Culture Strategy and Behavior, Hodgetts, Luthans and Doh
The Hidden Challenge of Cross- Border Negotiation by James Sebenius (Code 0203F)
Putting more on the table: How making Multiple Offers Can Increase the Final Value of
the Deal, Victoria Husted Medvec, Adam D. Galinsky,(Code N0504B)
Session Objective:
The session aims to explore the basic principles of negotiation. The fundamental elements of
negotiation process like managing interdependence, engaging in mutual adjustment and
managing conflict that are necessary for an efficient negotiation process would be the focal
discussion point for the session.
Learning Outcomes:
Students would be able identify the importance of negotiation process with emphasis on its
basic principles and outcomes. They would be aware about the key characteristics of a
negotiation situation, where the parties depend on each other to achieve their own preferred
outcome. The video would enable the students to identify the right or wrong approaches
followed within in the negotiation process.
Essential Reading:
Negotiation Checklist by Hallom Movious and Lawrence Susskind (Code 32363 DC)
Video: The video highlights the negotiation process between two parties. The learning
derived would be taken forward to the session II for understanding the strategies for effective
negotiation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rzq2Bq_EsA&feature=fvst
Website:
http://assets.cambridge.org/97805217/35216/excerpt/9780521735216_excerpt.pdf
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpf/docs/contract_pricing_finance_guide/vol5_ch1.pdf
The session highlights various strategies like distributive and integrative bargaining which are
required for effective negotiation process. The basic structure of the two strategies and
tactics used in them would be discussed with in the session.
Learning Outcomes:
The students would be able to understand the difference between the strategies and their
application within the different situations. They would know the mixed motive nature of most
negotiating situation while discussion on integrative and distributive and their mixed
relevance followed within in the negotiation process.
Essential reading:
Reference Reading:
The video highlights the quarrel over the orange. It highlights various strategies undertaken to
resolve the quarrel leading to win-lose, loose-loose and win-win outcome. The strategies
impact and their benefits within the negotiation process would be major focus.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OPzgWIAGao
Learning Outcome:
Students would understand the ways of creating value by exploiting common interests, using
tactics, and strategy. It will give clear understanding about the four basic principles of
Negotiation.
Reference Readings:
Required Readings:
Website
http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/example/fish5487.htm:
http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/example/fish7513.htm
It is widely recognized that systematic planning and preparation are critical elements of
successful business negotiations. For the negotiator, preparation means understanding one’s
own position and interests, the position and interest of the other party or parties, the issue at
stake and the alternative solutions. It means learning as much as possible about BATNA(Best
alternative to a negotiated agreement).Different phases and key factors involved within the
pre negotiation process would be discussed within the session.
Learning Outcome: Session would make students aware about the prenegotiation planning
along with its various phases and factors. Students would learn about the importance of such
planning and its implication in negotiation process.
Essential Reading:
Reference Reading:
Essential reading:
Frasier (A) and (B) Guhan Subramanian, Michelle Kalka (Code 801447)
Objective: The case gives an overview of a negotiation in the media industry. The case allows
students to apply the basic negotiation concepts of BATNA, ZOPA, reservation price etc in a
two party and single issue scenario.
The discussion would be focused upon how the beyond win-win situation is achieved with the
negotiation sub process. The session examines the role of blind spots, perception, cognition
and emotion of the negotiators that impact negotiations process. The case study discusses the
small mistakes during the negotiation process. How circumstances, understanding, contract
requirement affect the negotiation either for win-win and win and lose situation.
Learning Outcome: The students would be identifying the potential blind spots with the role
of perception, cognition and emotions within the negotiation process. Students would be able
to identify the emotions, expression and their impact within the dispute situations.
Reference Readings:
Required Readings:
iTune Podcast
The podcast outlines the role of expression and emotions within negotiation process. It is a
discussion between experts from different countries that highlights two dominant emotions:
fear and contempt within in a negotiation process.
http://itunes.apple.com/in/podcast/international-dispute-negotiation/id266808144
Session 8: Case Study Bill Nichol Negotiates with Walmart: Hard Bargains over Soft Goods (A)
and (B)
Required reading:
Bill Nichol Negotiates with Walmart: Hard Bargains over Soft Goods (A) by James K.
Sebenius, Ellen Knebel (Code 9-910-043)
Bill Nichol Negotiates with Walmart: Hard Bargains over Soft Goods (B) ) by James K.
Sebenius, Ellen Knebel (Code 9-910-044)
The session will discuss about the role of power and negotiating techniques in disputes
scenarios. The session examines nature of power with its dynamics in use in negotiation. The
sources of power (position based, relationship based) would be discussed within the session to
make student understand the power perspective within the negotiation process. All
negotiation wants power; they want to know what they can do to put pressure on the other
party to see in their way. We will discuss the case study which shows how a weaker
negotiating partner can successfully use power negotiation to win a good agreement with a
stronger negotiating partner.
Learning Outcomes:
Students would be able to identify rationale behind the power sources, derive the estimation
of power, and would be able to understand the power use effectively in the process of
negotiation. They understand the concept of power in action in negotiation process and also
the process of the tactics and messages an individual undertakes in order to change the
attitudes/behaviors of others.
Required Reading
A video on Pirates of the Caribbean which highlights the negotiation process, style, power
used by the key characters in the movie to maximize the outcomes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjQ5OomkVpg&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL
B5DB80EA9C053B05
Making a deal in business context or buying something from the store requires negotiating
skills. The video explores the examples of negotiation process in the organisational context.
The importance of persuasive arguments, priorities within the negotiation and the techniques
for the process are outlined.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWL3GXTpMeM
This session will focus on the standards for the behavior in negotiations.
Learning Outcome:
Students will be able to identify the major ethical dimensions raised in negotiations, describe
how people tend to think about these ethical choices and provide a framework for making
informed ethical decisions.
Required Reading:
Based on the negotiation between Google and the Chinese government to allow access by
Chinese citizens to a high-speed Chinese version of the Google search engine. In order to
reach agreement with the Chinese government, Google had to agree to allow the government to
censor access to some sites turned up by Google's search engine. In agreeing, Google
compromised its open-access policy. There were inquiries into the agreement by the U.S.
Congress and some outcry from U.S. citizens.
Learning Objective:
To learn how to analyze a negotiation from the perspective of each party when one is a
government and the other a private-sector organization; a subpoint here is the difference
between short-term and longer-term interests. To address the difficulties of balancing business
ethics and financial objectives; an important point here is to address what it means to be ethical
in a for-profit business environment. To understand the long-term effects of short-term actions.
Required Reading:
Google and government of China byChristopher Grogan, Jeanne Brett (Code KEL 242)
The session addresses the nature of coalitions and explores the process through which they
are formed, led, maintained and dissolved. It examines the need for coalitions in the process
of negotiations with role of power in coalition’s politics.
Learning Outcomes:
Students would be able to determine the need and factors governing coalitions formation and
payoffs associated with them for the negotiator.
Reference Reading:
The session highlights the global business negotiations perspective with emphasis on
negotiation framework in such a situation. Negotiation environment, negotiation setting,
negotiation infrastructure would be discussed within the session.
Learning Outcome:
The session would enable the students to understand the negotiation process and its various
dimensions within the global perspective.
Essential reading:
The Hidden Challenge of Cross- Border Negotiation by James Sebenius (Code 0203F)
Reference Reading:
Attendance
Students shall be required to maintain minimum 75% attendance within the course.
Assessment
Assessment Components
1. Case Analysis
Each student will have to submit case analysis and answer the case questions. Case analysis
report not more than 4 pages. This assignment will earn 15 marks.
The assignment should contain a description of exactly what happened and what the outcome
of the negotiation was. Students are also required to discuss preparation and strategy.
Include: the issues, interests and priorities, BATNA, your reservation point, and other
strategic features of the negotiation (time limits, outside parties, legal constraints, etc.), and
opponent's interests, and estimations of their BATNA and reservation point.
1) The depth of analysis. Correctly employed key concepts to assess the strategic landscape of
the negotiation? How well have you applied your learning from the course to your analysis of
this case?
2) The assignment's presentation. Is the assignment clearly organized and well written? Have
you stayed within page limits? Do spelling and grammatical irregularities interfere with the
story?
3) The quality of the story. Have you included all the relevant details? Is it interesting? Have
you explored the issues, concerns, and interests that allow an evaluation of your strategy? Is
this something not normally negotiated?
Note for Students: Excellent assignment will also be self-critical; no matter how positive the
outcome in the negotiation, you can consider what you could have done better to get more of
what you value. Don’t waste a lot of space on the fluffy details of the story, but spend time
on the analysis.
Students would be required to form a group of 6-8 students. The role play performance of
each group would be assessed on the following parameters:
Preparation
Performance
Peer Ratings
After each performance students would be given the feedback about their performances.
Assessment Map
Methods of Assessment
Module A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
Negotiation * * *
Teaching Map
Module T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Negotiation * * * *
T1- Lectures
T2- Seminars/Tutorials/Workshop
Curriculum Map
Learning Outcomes
Module L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9
Negotiation * * * * * * * * *
L2- An awareness of current issues in business and management which is informed by research
and practice in the field.
L3- An understanding of appropriate techniques sufficient to allow investigation into relevant
business and management issues.
L6- The ability to work and lead effectively in a team based environment.
L8- Be cognizant of the impact of their individual and corporate actions on society and
recognize ethical business practices.