Designation: G185 – 06
Standard Practice for
Evaluating and Qualifying Oil Field and Refinery Corrosion
Inhibitors Using the Rotating Cylinder Electrode1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation G185; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This practice covers a generally accepted procedure to
use the rotating cylinder electrode (RCE) for evaluating
corrosion inhibitors for oil field and refinery applications in
defined flow conditions.
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information
only.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:2
D1141 Practice for the Preparation of Substitute Ocean
Water
D4410 Terminology for Fluvial Sediment
G1 Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corro-
sion Test Specimens
G3 Practice for Conventions Applicable to Electrochemical
Measurements in Corrosion Testing
G5 Reference Test Method for Making Potentiostatic and
Potentiodynamic Anodic Polarization Measurements
G15 Terminology Relating to Corrosion and Corrosion
Testing
G16 Guide for Applying Statistics to Analysis of Corrosion
Data
G31 Practice for Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing
of Metals
G46 Guide for Examination and Evaluation of Pitting
Corrosion
G59 Test Method for Conducting Potentiodynamic Polar-
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee G01 on Corrosion
of Metals and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee G01.05 on Laboratory
Corrosion Tests.
Current edition approved Jan. 15, 2006. Published February 2006. DOI:
10.1520/G0185-06.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
ization Resistance Measurements
G96 Guide for Online Monitoring of Corrosion in Plant
Equipment (Electrical and Electrochemical Methods)
G102 Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and
Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements
G106 Practice for Verification of Algorithm and Equipment
for Electrochemical Impedance Measurements
G111 Guide for Corrosion Tests in High Temperature or
High Pressure Environment, or Both
G170 Guide for Evaluating and Qualifying Oilfield and
Refinery Corrosion Inhibitors in the Laboratory
3. Terminology
3.1 The terminology used throughout shall be in accordance
with Terminologies G15 and D4410 and Guide G170.
4. Summary of Practice
4.1 This practice provides a method of evaluating corrosion
inhibitor efficiency in a RCE apparatus. The method uses a
well-defined rotating specimen set up and mass loss or elec-
trochemical measurements to determine corrosion rates in a
laboratory apparatus. Measurements are made at a number of
rotating rates to evaluate the inhibitor performance under
increasingly severe hydrodynamic conditions.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Selection of corrosion inhibitor for oil field and refinery
applications involves qualification of corrosion inhibitors in the
laboratory (see Guide G170). Field conditions should be
simulated in the laboratory in a fast and cost-effective manner
(1).3
5.2 Oil field corrosion inhibitors should provide protection
over a range of flow conditions from stagnant to that found
during typical production conditions. Not all inhibitors are
equally effective over this range of conditions so that is
important for a proper evaluation of inhibitors to test the
inhibitors using a range of flow conditions.
5.3 The RCE is a compact and relatively inexpensive
approach to obtaining varying hydrodynamic conditions in a
laboratory apparatus. It allows electrochemical methods of
3
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of
this standard.
 G185 – 06
estimating corrosion rates on the specimen and produces a
uniform hydrodynamic state across the metal test surface.
(2-21)
5.4 In this practice, a general procedure is presented to
obtain reproducible results using RCE to simulate the effects of
different types of coupon materials, inhibitor concentrations,
oil, gas and brine compositions, temperature, pressure, and
flow. Oil field fluids may often contain sand. This practice does
not cover erosive effects that occur when sand is present.
6. Apparatus
6.1 Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the RCE system.
The RCE apparatus consists of a rotating unit driven by a
motor that is attached to a sample holder. A system with a range
of rotational speeds from 100 to 10 000 rpm with an accuracy
of 62 rpm is typical. It is essential to be able to rotate the
electrode at both low and high speeds and to be able to measure
the speed and maintain it at a constant. The accuracy of the
rotation rate should be checked. At the side of the sample
holder where it is outside the cell, electrical connections to the
electrodes are made by a brush contact. It is important for the
connection to be as noise free as possible.
6.2 The cylinder geometry is usually defined in terms of the
length-to-diameter ratio. Both low and high ratios are used,
with ratios varying between 0.3 and 3.0. The rotating cylinder
can also be used as a mass loss coupon when the mass loss is
sufficiently large to be accurately measured using a conven-
tional balance (with accuracy of 0.1 mg).
6.3 The RCE geometry may have an inner cylinder and an
outer cylinder. The geometry is usually defined in terms of the
radius of the inner cylinder and the radius of the outer cylinder.
When the outer diameter is several times the diameter of the
inner electrode the hydrodynamics are essentially controlled by
the diameter of the inner rotating cylinder (2). The outer
cylinder may act as counter electrode. An RCE with only an
inner cylinder may also be used.
6.4 A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) with a controlled
rate of leakage or a saturated calomel electrode utilizing a
semipermeable membrane or porous plug tip or silver/silver
chloride or any other suitable electrode should be used as
reference electrode. The potential of the reference electrode
should be checked at periodic intervals to ensure the accuracy
of the electrode. For experiments at higher-temperature, a
higher-pressure, reference electrode arrangement that can with-
stand higher temperature and pressure should be used (22).
This may require special care.
6.5 Fig. 2 shows a typical rotating electrode unit. A rotating
shaft can be modified by drilling a hole in the shaft into which
a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) insulator is inserted. Inside
the PTFE insulator, a metal rod should be introduced (Fig. 2).
One end of the metal rod is threaded so that the cylindrical
electrode can be attached. The other end of the rod is attached
directly to the rotating unit, through which the electrical
connection is made.
6.6 After attaching the specimen to the shaft, the system
should be checked for eccentricity and wobble. This can be
accomplished by installing a dial micrometer so as to monitor
the location of the top of the rotating cylinder and rotating the
shaft slowly through one complete turn. The micrometer
2
should then be moved to monitor the center of the specimen,
and the process repeated. Finally the micrometer should be
moved to the bottom of the specimen and the process repeated.
The assembly should also be rotated at its maximum rotation
rate and the specimen wobble checked again using, for
example, a laser indicator or vibration monitor.
6.7 Appropriate cylinder specimen (such as, carbon steel) is
machined and snugly fitted into the PTFE or any other suitable
specimen holder (Fig. 2). The presence of gap between
specimen and holder will create crevice corrosion as well as
change the flow pattern. If necessary, apply a very small
amount of epoxy to fit the specimen into the holder. Tightly
attach or screw an end-cap so that only the outer cylindrical
area of known length is exposed to the solution. The specimen
holder is then attached to the rotating unit. Specimen, holder,
and end-cap should all have the same diameter.
6.8 The rotating unit is attached into the experimental
vessel, ensuring that there is no leakage through the rotating
shaft and the holder and that the rotating shaft is vertically
positioned. Even a very slight inclination could drastically
change the flow pattern.
6.9 A versatile and convenient apparatus, consisting of a
kettle or flask (Fig. 1) of suitable size (usually 500 to
5000 mL), inlet and outlet ports for deaeration, thermowell and
temperature-regulating device, a heating device (mantle, hot
plate, or bath), and a specimen support system, should be used.
The volume (of the solution) to surface area (of the specimen)
ratio has some effect on the corrosion rate and hence inhibitor
efficiencies. A larger volume/surface area (minimum 40 mL/
cm2) should be preferred.
6.10 In some cases a wide-mouth jar with a suitable closure
can be used, but open-beaker tests should not be used because
of evaporation and contamination. Do not conduct the open-
beaker test when H2S (hydrogen sulfide) is used. In more
complex tests, provisions might be needed for continuous flow
or replenishment of the corrosive liquid, while simultaneously
maintaining a controlled atmosphere.
6.11 For experiments above atmospheric pressure, a high-
temperature, high-pressure rotating cylinder electrode (HTH-
PRCE) system with an electrically isolated electrode system,
an electrically isolated motor for rotating the electrode, and a
vessel that can withstand high pressure without leakage should
be used.
6.12 A design of the vessel that can be used in elevated
pressure conditions (23, 24) include a standard autoclave (Fig.
3) modified by lining on the inside with PTFE. The stirring rod
can be modified by drilling a hole into that a PTFE insulator is
inserted. Inside the PTFE insulator, a metal rod is introduced.
Three O-rings are used to secure and to prevent leakage. One
end of the metal rod is threaded so that cylindrical (Fig. 3)
electrode can be attached. The other end of the rod, projecting
slightly above the motor unit, is attached directly the rotating
unit, through which the electrical connection is made. The rod
is rotated by a motor connected to the rod using a belt. The
counter and reference electrodes are inserted inside the auto-
clave.
 G185 – 06

A. Reference Electrode
B. Inlet
C. Outlet
D. Luggin Capillary
E. Counter Electrode
F. Rotating Cylinder
G. Temperature Probe
H. pH Electrode
I. Rotating Cylinder Electrode or Coupon
FIG. 1 Schematic of a RCE System (18)

3
 G185 – 06
A. Outside View
B. Cross-Sectional View
FIG. 2 Schematic Representation of a RCE with its Components (adapted from Ref 18)
6.13 The suggested components can be modified, simpli-
fied, or made more sophisticated to fit the needs of a particular
investigation.
7. Materials
7.1 Methods for preparing specimens for tests and for
removing specimens after the test are described in Practice G1.
Standard laboratory glassware should be used for weighing and
measuring reagent volumes.
7.2 The specimen shall be made of the material (such as,
carbon steel) for which the inhibitor is being evaluated. The
specimen should have same metallographic structure as that
used in the service components. The specimens should be
ground to a specified surface finish (such as, 150-grit). The
grinding should produce a reproducible surface finish, with no
rust deposits, pits, or deep scratches. All sharp edges on the
specimen should be ground. All loose dirt particles should be
removed.
7.3 The specimens are rinsed with distilled water, degreased
by immersing in acetone (or any suitable alcohol), ultrasoni-
cally cleaned for 1 minute, and dried. The surface of the
specimens should not be touched with bare hands. The speci-
mens are weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg (for mass loss
measurements), the dimensions are measured to the nearest 0.1
mm, and the surface area is calculated.
7.4 Freshly prepared specimens are installed in the RCE
holder. If the test is not commenced within 4 h, the prepared
coupons shall be stored in a desiccator to avoid pre-rusting.
4
8. Test Solutions
8.1 All solutions (oil and aqueous) should be obtained from
the field for which the inhibitor is being evaluated. These are
known as live solutions. It is important that live solutions do
not already contain corrosion inhibitor. In the absence of live
solutions, synthetic solutions should be used, the composition
of which should be based on field water analysis. The compo-
sition of the solution should be determined and reported.
Alternatively, standard brine (such as per Practice D1141)
should be employed. The solutions should be prepared using
analytical grade reagents and deionized water.
8.2 The solutions should be deoxygenated by passing nitro-
gen or any other inert gas for sufficient time to reduce the
oxygen content below 5 ppb and preferably below 1 ppb in
solution. The solution must be kept under deoxygenated
conditions. The oxygen concentration in solution depends on
the quality of gases used to purge the solution. Any leaks
through vessel, tubing, and joints shall be avoided.
8.3 The appropriate composition of gases is determined by
the composition of gases in the field for which the inhibitor is
evaluated. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2)
are corrosive gases. H2S is poisonous and should not be
released to the atmosphere. The appropriate composition of gas
can be obtained by mixing H2S and CO2 streams from the
standard laboratory gas supply. Nitrogen or other inert gases
can be used as a diluent to obtain the required ratios of the
corrosive gases. Alternatively, gas mixtures of the required
 G185 – 06

1. Electrical Contact Unit

2. Techometer (Rotation Speed Display)
3. Rotation Controller
4. Electrochemical Instruments
5. Working Electrode
6. Reference Electrode
7. Water Cooler Coil
8. Gas Inlet
9. Thermocouple
10. Gas Outlet
11. Counter Electrode
12. Autoclave Body
13. Solution
14. PTFE Liner
FIG. 3 Schematic Diagram of HTHPRCE System (20,21)

compositions can be purchased from suppliers of industrial
gases. The concentrations of impurities, particularly oxygen,
shall be kept as low as possible with guidelines of below 5 ppb
and preferably under 1 ppb oxygen in solution.
8.4 The solution pH before and after testing shall be
measured, recorded, and reported. The solution pH should be
monitored regularly (at least once a day) during the test.
8.5 Inhibitor concentrations should be measured and re-
ported in % mass/volume or parts per million (ppm). The
method of injecting the inhibitor into the test solution should
reflect the actual field application. Water-soluble inhibitors
may be injected neat (as-received) into the test solution
(aqueous phase). To avoid the errors associated with handling
small volumes of solution, an inhibitor stock solution may be
prepared by diluting the as-received chemical in an appropriate
solvent. The type of solvent and the concentration of the stock
solution depend on the characteristics of the inhibitor and on
the specified test conditions.
8.6 Oil-soluble, water-dispersible inhibitor solutions are
prepared by the partition method. The required amounts of oil
and brine are placed in the partitioning vessel (usually a
separation funnel). The relative volumes of oil and aqueous
phases should reflect the ratios of water and oil in the field for
which the inhibitor is evaluated. If samples from the field are
not available, heptane, kerosine or any suitable hydrocarbon
may be used. The corrosion inhibitor is added to the oil phase.
The vessel is vigorously shaken for one minute to mix both
phases thoroughly, and the phases are allowed to separate.
Heating to the temperature of the field helps in the separation.
The aqueous phase is removed and used as test solution.
8.7 Oil-soluble inhibitors (usually as batch inhibitors) are
dissolved in the oil phase to form an inhibited oil-phase. The

5
 G185 – 06
coupons are exposed to this solution for a certain amount of
time (usually 30 min). The coupons are then removed and
introduced into the experimental vessel.
9. Experimental Procedure for Atmospheric Pressure
Experiments
9.1 Detailed procedures to determine corrosion rates using
electrochemical instruments are described in Practice G3, Test
Method G5, Test Method G59, Guide G96, Practice G102, and
Practice G106, and a procedure to determine corrosion rates
from mass loss is described in Practice G31.
9.2 Solutions are usually prepared in a separate container
called the preparation vessel, pre-saturated with the required
gas mixture, and preheated to the required temperature. Pre-
treatment described in 8.5-8.7 is usually carried out in the
preparation vessel. Transfer solutions from the preparation
vessel to the experimental vessel (described in Section 6) under
positive nitrogen or other inert gas pressure to minimize air
contamination during the transfer operation.
9.3 Depending on the size of experimental vessel, heating
unit (mantle, bath, or wrapper around the vessel), difference
between room and experimental temperatures, a range of
temperature may prevail within the vessel. Take care to avoid
or minimize the temperature differentials. Heat the test vessels
slowly (usually at a rate of 0.1°C/s) to avoid overheating. The
exact protocol depends on the controller, the size and output of
the heater, and parameters such as vessel size, amount of
liquid, thermal conductivity of liquid, and agitation. Maintain
the test temperature within 2°C of the specified temperature.
9.4 Insert pre-weighed coupons (pretreated as necessary,
such as with batch inhibitors), thermometer, and pH probes (as
appropriate). Position the liquid inlet and outlet such that none
of them are protruding into the solution.
9.5 Initially all other ports of the experimental vessel,
except inlet and outlet ports are closed. The inlet tube should
have a Y-joint. Attach one end to the experimental vessel.
Attach the other two ends to the preparation vessel and to an
inert gas, for example, argon or nitrogen cylinder.
9.6 First, pass the inert gas to expel oxygen from the
experimental vessel.
9.7 After 15 min, stop the gas flow, and close the passage
between the experimental vessel and the gas cylinder.
9.8 Close the passage between the experimental and prepa-
ration vessels.
9.9 Open the passage between the experimental and prepa-
ration vessels, and pump the gas-saturated brine, which may or
may not contain inhibitor prepared as per 8.6 or 8.7, into the
experimental vessel. Maintain the experimental vessel with the
heater or the water bath at the required temperature.
9.10 The additional gas-inlet on top of the vessel should
allow for keeping the gas mixture blanket on top of the
solution, which is required when the experiment is planned for
longer duration, for example, more than 24 h. Keep the gas
flow rate to a minimum. Take care that the gas does not entrain
with the solution.
9.11 The speed controller is used to preset the rotation speed
and to start the motor. The rotation speed usually stabilizes, as
6
displayed by the tachometer, within 30 s. Alternatively, the
rotation speed can be set prior to pumping the solution into the
vessel.
9.12 The electrodes (working, counter, and reference) are
connected to the electrochemical instruments. After the poten-
tial has reasonably stabilized (usually within 1 h), perform the
electrochemical measurements (LPR or EIS) at regular inter-
vals. Procedures to determine corrosion rate from electro-
chemical measurements are described in Guide G96.
9.13 After the predetermined time or after the corrosion rate
is stabilized, the continuous inhibitor may be injected and the
corrosion rate can be monitored.
9.14 For mass loss experiments, terminate the experiment
(typically after 24 h), and determine the corrosion rate from the
amount of metal loss (after proper cleaning as described in
Practice G1) as described in Practice G31. The samples are
examined and evaluated for pitting corrosion as in Guide G46.
If the experiments are repeated two or more times, then
calculate the average, standard deviation and coefficient of
variation using the methods provided in Guide G16.
9.15 Determine the Inhibitor efficiency at each rotation
speed and at each inhibitor concentration using the following
equation:
@C.R]No.inhibitor – [C.R] Inhibitor 3 100
Inhibitor Efficiency, % 5 (1)
@C.R]No Inhibitor
where:
[C.R]No.inhibitor = the corrosion rate in absence of inhibi-
tor, and
[C.R]inhibitor = the corrosion rate in the presence of
inhibitor.
10. Experimental Procedure for High-Temperature,
High-Pressure Experiments
10.1 A general procedure to carry out corrosion experiments
at elevated pressure and temperature is described in Guide
G111. Before the experiments, check the autoclave for safety
and integrity at a pressure that is about 1.5 times the pressure
at which the experiment is planned. For example, if the
experiment is planned at 250 psi (1724 kPa), test the system at
about 400 psi (2759 kPa). This testing is required to ensure the
safety of the personnel and the equipment, and also to detect
any leak. After pressurizing the autoclave to the preset value,
close the inlet and outlet valves. After 30 min, test the
autoclave for any leaks. If any leak is found, tighten the
autoclave head screws and recheck for any further leak. If there
is still any pressure loss, then the system is faulty. Stop the
experiment and have the autoclave inspected and repaired. If
the pressure holds constant for more than 30 min, release the
pressure by opening the outlet. Once the pressure gauge shows
that the pressure has been released, close the outlet valve.
10.2 As in the atmospheric pressure experiments, follow the
steps in 9.2-9.11 to charge the autoclave.
10.3 For high-temperature, high-pressure experiments using
a premixed gas composition, pressurize the autoclave using the
specified gas composition, and depressurize to approximately
0.2 bars above atmospheric pressure. Repeat this cycle of
pressurizing/depressurizing at least twice to ensure that the gas
 G185 – 06
space has the required composition. Finally, pressurize the
autoclave to the test pressure.
10.4 For high-temperature, high-pressure experiments (25,
26) using individual gases, pressurize the autoclave with H2S
to the required partial pressure and leave for 10 min. If there is
a decrease of pressure, pressurize the autoclave again. Repeat
this process until there is no further pressure loss. Then,
pressurize the autoclave with CO2 by opening the CO2 gas
cylinder at a pressure equal to the CO2 and H2S partial
pressures, and leave it for 10 min. If there is a decrease of
pressure, pressurize the autoclave again with CO2. Repeat this
process until no further pressure loss is reported. Finally,
pressurize the autoclave with the inert gas by opening the inert
gas cylinder at the total gas pressure at which the experiments
are to be carried out.
10.5 Carry out experiments using the same procedure as that
for atmospheric pressure experiments (see 9.12-9.14).
11. Report
11.1 Record all information and data as completely as
possible. Practice G31 provides a checklist for reporting
corrosion data.
11.2 Average corrosion rates and the standard deviation of
each concentration of inhibitor at each rotation rate should be
reported.
11.3 The following checklist is a recommended guide for
reporting important information:
11.3.1 Solution chemistry and concentration (any changes
during test).
11.3.2 Volume of test solution.
11.3.3 Volume of the experimental vessel.
11.3.4 Temperature (maximum, minimum, average).
11.3.5 Pressure (maximum, minimum, average).
11.3.6 Duration of each test.
REFERENCES
(1) Papavinasam, S., “Corrosion Inhibitors,” Uhlig’s Corrosion Hand-
book, Revie, R. Winston, ed., 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000,
p. 1089, and p. 1169.
(2) Gabe, D. R., “The Rotating Cylinder Electrode (Review),” Journal of
Applied Electrochemistry, Vol 4, 1974, p. 91.
(3) NACE-5A195, “State-of-the-Art Report on Controlled-Flow Labora-
tory Corrosion Test,” NACE International Publication, Item No.24187,
Houston, TX, December 1995.
(4) Silverman, D. C., “The Rotating Cylinder Electrode for Examining
Velocity-Sensitive Corrosion—A Review,” Corrosion, NACE, Vol
60, No. 11, 2004, p. 1003.
(5) Silverman, D. C., “Rotating Cylinder Electrode for Velocity Sensitiv-
ity Testing,” Corrosion, NACE, Vol 40, 1984, p. 220.
(6) Silverman, D. C., “Rotating Cylinder Electrode - Geometry Relation-
ships for Prediction of Velocity-Sensitive Corrosion,” Corrosion
NACE, Vol 44, No. 1, 1988, p. 42.
(7) Eisenberyg, M., Tobias, C. W., and Wilke, C. R., “Ionic Mass Transfer
and Concentration Polarization at Rotating Electrodes,” Journal of
Electrochemical Society, Vol 101, 1954, p. 306.
(8) Silverman, D. C., “On Estimating Conditions for Simulating Velocity-
Sensitive Corrosion in the Rotating Cylinder Electrode,” Corrosion,
NACE, Vol 55, No. 12, 1999, p. 1115.
7
11.3.7 Chemical composition or trade name of metal.
11.3.8 Form and metallurgical conditions of specimen.
11.3.9 Exact size, shape, and area of specimen.
11.3.10 Inhibitor type and concentration.
11.3.11 Treatment used (including e.g., batch inhibitor) to
prepare specimens.
11.3.12 Type of corrosion measurements, such as mass loss
or electrochemical (that is, linear polarization resistance (LPR),
electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)). Practice G1
and Practice G102 provide methods to determine corrosion
rates from mass loss and electrochemical measurements re-
spectively.
11.3.13 For electrochemical measurements, size, shape, and
distance (from working electrode) of counter and reference
electrodes, Tafel constants, solution resistance, number and
frequency of measurements, and EIS model. Test Method G5
and Practice G106 provides information for making polariza-
tion and impedance measurements.
11.3.14 Test method used to clean specimens after experi-
ment and the extent of any error expected by this treatment.
11.3.15 Initial and final masses and actual mass losses for
mass loss measurement
11.3.16 Inhibitor efficiency at each concentration and at
each rotation speed.
11.3.17 Evaluation of attack if other than general, such as
pit depth and distribution, standard deviation and coefficient of
variation, crevice corrosion, and results of microscopical
examination.
12. Keywords
12.1 corrosion inhibitor; electrochemical; high-pressure;
high-temperature; laboratory evaluation; mass loss; oil-field
inhibitors; RCE; refinery inhibitors; rotating cylinder electrode
(9) Wranglen, G., Berendson, J., Karlberg, G., “Apparatus for Electro-
chemical Studies of Corrosion Processes in Flowing Systems,”
Physico-Chemical Hydrodynamics, Spalding, B., ed., Adv. Publica-
tions, London, England, 1977, p. 461.
(10) Chilton, T. H., and Colburn, A. P., “Mass-Transfer (Absorption)
Coefficients,” Ind. Eng. Chem., Vol 26, 1934, p. 1183.
(11) Holser, R. A., Prentice, G., Pond, Jr., R. B., and Guanti, R., “Use of
Rotating Cylinder Electrodes to Simulate Turbulent Flow Conditions
in Corrosion Systems,” Corrosion, NACE, Vol 46, No. 9, 1990, p.
764.
(12) Chen, T. Y., Moccari, A. A., and Macdonald, D. D., “Development of
Controlled Hydrodynamic Techniques for Corrosion Testing,” Cor-
rosion, NACE, Vol 48, No. 3, 1992, p. 239.
(13) Harriott, P., Hamilton, R. M., “Solid-Liquid Mass Transfer in
Turbulent Pipe Flow,” Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol 20, 1965, p. 107.
(14) Nesic, S., Solvi, G. T., and Skjerve, S., “Comparison of Rotating
Cylinder and Loop Methods for Testing CO2 Corrosion Inhibitors,”
British Corrosion Journal, Vol 32, No. 4, 1997, p. 269.
(15) Berger, F. P., and Hau, K. F. F. L., “Mass Transfer in Turbulent Pipe
Flow Measured by the Electrochemical Method,” Journal of Heat
Mass Transfer, Vol 20, 1977, p. 1185.
(16) Denpo, K., and Ogama, H., “Fluid Flow Effects on CO2 Corrosion
 G185 – 06
Resistance of Oil Well Materials,” Corrosion, Vol 49, No. 6, 1993,
p. 442.
(17) Ellison, B. T., and Schmeal, W. R., Journal of Electrochemical
Society, Vol 125, No. 4, 1978, p. 524.
(18) Roberge, P., “Corrosion Testing Made Easy Series,” Erosion-
Corrosion, NACE International, 2004.
(19) Kappesser, R., Cornet, I., and Greif, R., “Mass Transfer to a Rough
Rotating Cylinder,” Journal of Electrochemical Society, Vol 118,
No. 12, 1971, p. 1957.
(20) Papavinasam, S., Revie, R. W., Attard, M., Demoz, A., Sun, H.,
Donini, J. C., and Michaelian, K. H., “Laboratory Methodologies for
Corrosion Inhibitor Selection,” Material Performance, Vol 39, No.
8, 2000, p. 58.
(21) Papavinasam, S., Revie, R. W., Attard, M., Demoz, A., and Michae-
lian, K., “Comparison of Laboratory Methodologies to Evaluate
Corrosion Inhibitors for Oil and Gas Pipelines,” Corrosion, NACE,
Vol 59, No. 10, 2003, p. 897.
(22) Ives, D. J. G., Janz, G. J., “Reference Electrodes,” Academic Press,
New York, NY, 1961.
(23) Papavinasam, S., and Revie, R. W., “High-Temperature, High-
Pressure Rotating Electrode System,” International Pipeline Confer-
ence, ASME, Vol 1, No. 341, 1998.
(24) Papavinasam, S., and Revie, R. W., “Synergistic Effect of Pressure
and Flow on Corrosion Rates: Studies Using High-Temperature,
High-Pressure Rotating Electrode System,” NACE Corrosion Con-
ference, Paper No. 30, 1999.
(25) Crolet, J. L., and Bonis, M. R., “How to Pressurize Autoclaves for
Corrosion Testing under Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide
Pressure,” Corrosion, Vol 56, 2000, p. 167.
(26) Hausler, R. H., “Methodology for Charging Autoclaves at High
Pressures and Temperatures with Acid Gases,” Corrosion, Vol 54,
1998, p. 641.

ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.

This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.

This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).