Kashmir back at UN Security Council Table

By: Nasir Qadri Advocate J&K High Court, Srinagar

It was 1st January,1948, when India took the question of Kashmir to the
United Nation by instituting a formal complaint against Pakistan in the
Security Council. The Indian and Pakistani delegates traded charges
against each other in the council.
To begin with, Government of India alleged that the invaders from
Pakistan have reached to Kashmir and are operating against the
territory, which had acceded to India. The complaint filed by India
requested the council to call upon Pakistan to put an end immediately
to the giving of assistance to the invaders. In addition, the Indian
representative charged Pakistan with committing aggression against
India in these words;

“It should be clear that the Government of Pakistan are

unwilling to stop the assistance in material and man
which the invaders are receiving from Pakistan
territory and from Pakistan nationals including
Pakistan government personal both military and civil.
This attitude in not only unnatural but constitutes
active aggression against India of which the state of
Jammu and Kashmir forms a part”
The Government of Pakistan in its reply denied the charge leveled by
Indian representative in a complaint of assisting the raiders on the
contrary, the Government of Pakistan filed a counter complaint under
Article 35 of UN charter claiming that Government of India is involved
in the genocide of Muslim population; of attempts to undo Pakistan; of
the forcible occupation of Junagarh; of securing the accession of
Kashmir by fraud and violence; of the numerous attacks on its territory
by the royal Indian air force and by armed bands from the Indian union
etc. the government of Pakistan requested the council to make India
desist from these activities where by the Kashmirs could without

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

pressure from any side express their free choice of the accession to India
or Pakistan.

At the conclusion of a lengthy debate in the matter, the United Nation

Security Council adopted two resolution by virtue of first resolution
dated 17th January 1948 it asked the two government;

“Refrain from aggravating the situation and to do

everything within their power to improve the situation.
It also requested them to immediately apprise the
council of any material change in the situation”

By virtue of second resolution adopted on 20th January 1948 it

established the United Nations commission for India and Pakistan
(UNCIP). Composed of three members (later increased to five), one
each nominated by Pakistan and India and the third by the two of them,
the commission was mandated to play a mediatory role.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

 On 28th January 1948 the president of UNCIP presented draft of
resolution submitted by the both delegations of India and Pakistan. The
Pakistani draft called upon the commission to arrange for
 Withdrawal from Kashmir of India armed forces and the tribes man and
as well as trespassers weather belonging to Pakistan or India.
 The reparation of all resident of Kashmir who left on their own are who
were compelled to leave as a result of this unfortunate event.
 The establishment in Kashmir often impartial interim administration;
 The holding of a plebiscite to ascertain the free, fair and un-fettered will
of Kashmiris as to whether the state wished to exceed to India or
Pakistan.

The government of India on contrary presented a draft before the

council and promised repeatedly or holding of plebiscite in Kashmir,
focused on “promoting the cessation of act of hostility and
violence” the Indian draft also put a clause for “convocation of
National assembly based on adult suffrage and the establishment of
natural government.
The reaction of the members of the Security Council was quite
unfavorable to the Indian draft e.g., commenting on the draft the
United Kingdom representative Mr. Noel-Barker observed;

“The settlement arrived at quickly in the Security

Council is a real way to stop fighting. He viewed the
whole episode staring form the preliminary measure
as to be fighting right up to the eventual plebiscite as
one problem”.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Mr. Austin from United States was of the view;

“That a machinery would be free from any kind of

suspicion and was actually an unbiased and impartial
administration for the plebiscite, which could be
backed by all “

Mr. Tsang from china was of the opinion that;

“Principle of free and impartial plebiscite should be

conducted for deciding the question of accession, so
that much of the incentive to violence and to the use
of force should be removed”

The debate on Kashmir dispute resumed on 10th March, following

another lengthy discussion in United Nation Security Council. On
21st April, 1948 the Security Council adopted a resolution by virtue of
which the Pakistan government was asked to try to secure the
withdrawal of tribesman and India was allowed to retain the minimum
force for assistance in the civil administration for maintenance of law
and order. The resolution also stipulated that the United Nation
Secretary General would appoint at plebiscite administrative who was
to act as an officer of the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912


Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Around the time the above mentioned resolution was being adopted,
the Indian army did not honor the resolution and started offensive
military action in Kashmir, which created a big refugee problem for
Pakistan from adjacent side of Bhimber, Mirpur, Poonch and Kohala.
The Security Council met at the 312th meeting of Security Council on
3rdJune 1948 and direct the United Nation Commission for India and
Pakistan to proceed without delay to the area of dispute with a view to
accomplishing in priority the duties assigned to it by the previous
resolution.

The commission conducted the negotiation with the leaders of both

countries and on the spot study of situation, based on same the
commission adopted two resolutions dated 13th August, 1948 and
5th January, 1949.
The first resolution dated 13th August, 1948 consisted of three part.
According to part I, The government of Pakistan and India were to
observe cease fire in the state of Jammu and Kashmir and according to
part II, a truce agreement was executed between the parties part III,

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

reaffirmed that the future status of the state will be determine by will of
people of Jammu and Kashmir.
The resolution dated 5th January 1949 adopted by Security Council was
meant to supplement the early one of 13th August 1948. The part II, of
the resolution of 13th August 1948. The commission’s proposal was
strongly supported by Prime Minister Atlee and President Truman it
was accepted by Pakistan and rejected by India

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Following the failure of commission to get its arbitration accepted, the
later suggested that other arrangement be made for further negotiation
in the matter. In pursuant of this suggestion, the United Nation
Security Council asked its president General McNaughton of Canada to
undertake the task. The General proposed that the reduction of Armed
forces of both Pakistan and India be made in stage so that it does not
cause fear to the people on either side of the cease fire line. Pakistan
accepted these proposal and India rejected them. The McNaughton
proposal is annexed below;

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912


The Security Council passed resolution 80(1950) of United Nation

Security Council March 14th, 1950. UNSC commended that
government of India and Pakistan for their statesman action in
reaching the agreement embodied in the United Nations commissions
of 13th August, 1948 and 5th January 1949 for cease fire, for the
delimitation of the state Jammu and Kashmir and for the
determination of its final disposition in accordance with the will of
people of thorough the democratic method of free and impartial
plebiscite.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Following this development on 14th March 1950 the Security Council
adopted a resolution by virtue of which it wound up the united nation
commission for India and Pakistan and it is placed created the office of
United Nations representative for the purpose of demilitarization of
state. The Security Council appointed Sir Owen Dixon, a Judge of
Australia High Court and subsequently he was elevated as chief justice
of Australia. He made strenuous efforts to get the two countries to agree
to his program of demilitarization but failed to do so because of India’s
refusal who corporate with him and he himself stated in his report to
the Security Council,

“…In the end I became convinced that India agreement

would never be obtained to demilitarization in any
such form or to the provision governing the period of
the plebiscite of any such character as would in my
opinion permit of the plebiscite being conducted in
conditions sufficiently guarding against intimidation
and other form of influence and abuse by which the
freedom and fairness of plebiscite might be imperiled”

When on 21st February, 1951 the Dixon report came up for

consideration, the Security Council accepted the resignation of Sir
Owen and in his place decided to appoint another united nation
representative.
In the mean while the question of the convening of Kashmir
constitutional assembly was called, which was supposedly meeting to
decide the future of Jammu And Kashmir State.
The Security Council passed the resolution 91(1951) of United Nation
dated March 13, 1951. The council adopted resolution as;

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

“Reaffirming the principle that the final disposal of the
state would be through a free and impartial plebiscite,
it declare that…… any action that the assembly might
attempt to take to determine the future shape and
affiliation of the entire state or any part thereof would
not constitute act disposition of in accordance of the
above principle”.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Statement was also issued by permanent representative of India, Sir

Bengal Rau in the Security Council, 1st march 1951;

“The Kashmir constituent assembly was not intended

to prejudice the issue before Security Council. A few
days later on 9th march the Indian representative stated
his government’s view that though the constituent
assembly was free to express its opinion on the
question of the future of the state, it can take no
decision on it.”

A similar assurance is given by the then prime minister of India PT

Jawaharlal Nehru in the Indian parliament on 28th march 1951 and in
the course of press conference on 11 June 1951. On 30th April 1951 the
council appointed the former senator Frank. P Graham as the new UN
representative. The security council adopted the resolution 96(1951) of
UN Security Council November 10 1951 reaffirming “their
determination to work for peacefully settlement, there will to observe

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

cease fire agreement and their acceptance of the principle that the
accession of the state Jammu and Kashmir should be determined by a
free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the united nation. He
further instructs to put efforts for the demilitarization of state of Jammu
and Kashmir”.

Mr. Graham submitted 6 reports on the demilitarization of the state to

the council but his mission was no different from that of Sir Owen’s as
before, Pakistan accept all the different proposal made by Graham but
India rejected them all. On 24th December 1952 the Security Council
adopted a resolution which urged India and Pakistan to enter into the
negotiations for the purpose of reaching agreement on the size of the

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

 force of the parties to remain on either side of cease fire line after
demilitarization

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Around this period the Kashmir constitute assembly was established

and 73 out of 75 of its members, all of whom who were man of Sheikh
Abdullah were elected unopposed which prompted Joseph Korbel
(Author of Danger in Kashmir) to comment “No dictator could do
better”.
After the making of Indian constitution the assembly adopted a
constitution by virtue of which autonomy of Kashmir in all matters
except foreign affairs, defense and communication was recognized. In
January 1957 the UN security council again took up the Kashmir
question on January 24 1957 the council adopted a 5 power resolution
which affirming the right of self-determination of Kashmir’s to decide
their own future, through the UN held plebiscite as embodied among
others in the UNCIP resolution of 13th August 1948 and 5 January 1949
and endorsing it is resolution of 30 march 1951, declared that any action
taken by the constituent assembly or by the parties concerned to
determine the future shape and affiliation of the state would not
constitute at this position of the state in accordance with principle of
self-determination.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

The Security Council adopted another resolution on 2nd December 1957
which requested the UN representative Frank. P Graham to propose
further appropriate action for implementation of resolution of
13th august 1948 and 5th January 1949

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



The Kashmir dispute was next taken up by United Nation security

council in February 1962 , the debate on this matter went on
intermittently till 22nd June when a resolution tabled by Ireland urging
the parties to enter into the fresh negotiations which was vetoed by
soviet union. In between a statement was issued by the president of
Security Council on 18th May 1964 which summarize the conclusion of
the debate on Kashmir as the Indo-Pak question remains on the agenda
of the Security Council.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
The next milestone on the question of the Kashmir came in September
1965 when two countries fought a war with each other. A cease fire was
later arranged between them through the auspicious of the united
nation and by virtue of mediator effort of Soviet Union Tashkent
declaration was signed.

In 1971 international armed conflict again broke out between India and
Pakistan and the United Nation Security Council 307(1971) December
21 1971, it demands that the durable cease fire and the cessation of all
hostilities in all areas of the conflict be strictly observed and remain in
effect until withdrawal take place as soon as practical and the position
which free respect the cease fire line in Jammu and Kashmir supervised
by united nation military observer group in India and Pakistan. The
council further calls to take measures necessary to present the human
lives and observe the Geneva Convention 1949.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912



Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

In 1972 President Bhutto and Prime Minister Indira Gandhi met in
Shimla and concluded a peace agreement called a “Shimla Agreement”.
The most important provision of this agreement which has been subject
to differing interpretation reads as;

“That the countries are resolved to settle their

differences by peaceful means through bilateral
negotiation or by any other peaceful means mutually
agreed upon between them”.
The government of Pakistan and the stakeholders of Kashmir made
several attempts to pursuit India to enter into any bilateral dialogue
with Pakistan so that the non-pending dispute of Kashmir would be
settled but India while interpreting the bilateral agreement narrowly
contends that the Pakistan cannot raise the question of Kashmir. In
1989 a new development took place as a guerrilla movement started
with the aim to liberate Kashmir from the barbaric rule of Indian army
who are involved in the worst Human Rights violation in disputed
territory military. The security council adopted a resolution 1172(98) of
UN security council June 6th 1998 urging India and Pakistan to resume
the dialogue between them on all outstanding issues particularly on all
matters pertaining to peace and security in order to remove the tension
between them and encourage them to find mutual acceptance solutions
that address the root cause of those tensions including Kashmir.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912
Pakistan has again approached the UN security council on 13th August
2019 requesting to hold a urgent session on disputed Kashmir, amid the
Indian parliament unilaterally revoked the special status of the Kashmir
guaranteed under the constitution of India which came to be
incorporated in-light of the disputed character. The government of
Pakistan has built the case on the ground that Jammu and Kashmir
being disputed territory is already on the agenda of UN security council
since January 1948 further, the Pakistan enunciate that the people of
other colonial territories, notably East Timor, have been enabled to
exercise their right of self-determination, the struggle of the people of
disputed Jammu and Kashmir has been denied despite the resolutions
of the United Nation security council.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438912