Professional Documents
Culture Documents
146 PDF
146 PDF
Abstract In this paper we summar- the gel beads form straight chainlike
Received: 26 July 1999
Accepted: 27 August 1999 ise the eects induced by electric and structures, whereas in nonhomoge-
magnetic ®elds on the mobility and neous ®elds the beads aggregates due
shape of polymer gels containing a to the magnetophoretic force direct-
complex ¯uid as a swelling agent. ed to the highest ®eld intensity. The
Presented at the 39th General Meeting of Magnetic-®eld-sensitive gel beads ability of magnetic-®eld-sensitive
the Colloid-Gesellschaft, WuÈrzburg 27±30 and monolith gels have been pre- gels to undergo quick, controllable
September 1999
pared by introducing magnetic par- changes in shape can be used to
M. ZrõÂ nyi ticles of colloidal size into chemically mimic muscular contraction.
Department of Physical Chemistry cross-linked poly(N-isopropylacryl-
Technical University of Budapest amide) and poly(vinyl alcohol) Key words Intelligent material á
H-1521 Budapest, Hungary hydrogels. The in¯uence of uniform Responsive gels á Magnetic-®eld-
e-mail: zrinyi.fkt@chem.bme.hu
Tel.:36-1-4633229 and nonuniform ®elds has been sensitive polymer gel á Arti®cial
Fax: 36-1-4633939 studied. In uniform magnetic ®elds muscle
polymer gels, and this is followed by a summary of sensitive gels by using a polymer network swollen by a
magnetically controlled polymer gels. complex ¯uid. The colloidal particles incorporated,
characterized by strong adsorptive interactions between
solid particles and polymer chains, couple the shape
Responsive gels and physical properties of the gel to the external ®eld.
These ®eld-sensitive gels can be exploited to construct
Polymer gels are unique materials in the sense that no new types of soft actuators, sensors, micromachines,
other class of materials can be made to respond to so biomimetic energy-transducing devices and controlled
many dierent stimuli as polymer gels. The stimuli that delivery systems.
have been demonstrated to induce abrupt changes in If a ®eld-sensitive gel is exposed to an external ®eld,
physical properties are diverse and include temperature, two distinct types of interactions can be identi®ed: ®eld±
pH, solvent or ionic composition, electric ®eld, light particle interaction and particle±particle interaction [7,
intensity as well as the introduction of speci®c ions [2±5]. 8]. If the ®eld is nonuniform, the ®eld±particle interac-
In the last few years, these gels have become of major tions are dominant. The particles experience a dielec-
interest as novel intelligent materials. Many kinds of trophoretic (DEP) or a magnetophoretic (MAP) force.
such gels have been developed and studied with regard As a result the particles are attracted to regions of
to their application to several biomedical and industrial stronger ®eld intensities. Because of the cross-linking
®elds, for example, controlled drug delivery systems, bridges in the network, changes in molecular conforma-
musclelike soft linear actuators, biomimetic energy- tion due to either DEP or MAP forces can accumulate
transducing devices and separation techniques. and lead to macroscopic shape changes and/or motion.
Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel, abbreviated The main features of the DEP and MAP forces are
as NIPA gel, is one of the most frequently studied summarised in Table 1.
temperature-responsive hydrogels. This gel has negative In uniform ®elds the situation is completely dierent.
thermosensitivity, i.e. it shrinks with increasing temper- Due to the lack of a ®eld gradient, there are no attractive
ature. A noncontinuous collapse transition takes place or repulsive ®eld±particle interactions. The particle±
around 34 °C. There are several other gels which show particle interactions become dominant. The imposed
reversible noncontinuous swelling and shrinking transi- ®eld induces electric or magnetic dipoles. As a result,
tions at dierent temperatures [5, 6]. mutual particle interactions occur if the particles are so
Attempts at developing stimuli-responsive gels are closely spaced that the local ®eld can in¯uence their
often complicated by the fact that structural changes, neighbours. This mutual interaction can be very strong,
such as volume changes, are kinetically restricted by leading to a signi®cant change in the structure of particle
relatively slow swelling or deswelling process [3]. This ensembles. The particles attract each other when aligned
disadvantage often hinders the eorts to design opti- end to end, and repel each other in the side-by-side
mum gels for dierent purposes. Other applications situation. Due to the attractive forces pearl-chain
require noncontact modes of deformation and movabil- structure develops. The ®eld-induced chain formation
ity. In order to accelerate the response rate and to has major implications for a number of technologies
achieve noncontact agitation a new driving mechanism [20].
had to be found. Electric and magnetic ®elds seemed to
be promising stimuli.
Polymer gels in electric and magnetic ®elds Table 1 Particle±®eld interactions in nonuniform ®elds. R means
the radius of solid particles, e and l stands for the permittivity and
All materials experience forces or torques when subject- permeability, respectively. The index 2 refers to the colloidal par-
ed to electric or magnetic ®elds. These interactions are ticle and the index 1 denotes the swelling agent
strong for certain solid materials, but are rather weak Electric ®eld Magnetic ®eld
for ¯uid systems. In order to enhance the in¯uence of Dielectrophoretic (DEP) force Magnetophoretic (MAP) force
external ®elds on solution and/or gel properties, it is
necessary to combine solidlike and ¯uidlike behaviour. fDEP 2pe1 R3 KrE02 fMAP 2pl1 R3 KrH02
New colloidal solutions, termed complex ¯uids, have Permittivities Permeabilities
been introduced. Electrorheological ¯uids, magneto- K e2 ÿe1
K ll22l
ÿl1
e2 2e1
rheological ¯uids and ferro¯uids contain dispersed small 2 1
particles in the size range from nanometres to micro- Field gradient Field gradient
metres [7]. These ¯uids respond to an applied ®elds rE0 rH0
by rapidly changing their apparent viscosity and yield Low energy consumption Signi®cant energy consumption
stress. Since polymer gels contain a substantial amount may be dangerous safe
of liquid as a swelling agent, it is possible to make ®eld-
100
Magnetic-®eld-sensitive NIPA gels moment of the beads vanishes and the aggregation can
be destroyed by slight mechanical agitation.
We have prepared a novel polymer gel (MNIPA), The situation is somewhat dierent if we put the
characterised by temperature and magnetic ®eld sensi- magnetic gel beads in a homogeneous magnetic ®eld. In
tivity. In the abbreviation of MNIPA, M Means NIPA this case no force is exerted on the gel beads, but
with magnetic particles incorporated. By incorporation the magnetic ®eld polarises the beads and induces a
of magnetite nanoparticles into NIPA hydrogels we are magnetic moment in them. The induced magnetic
able to target magnetic gel beads to a certain place and moments are aligned parallel to the imposed ®eld. The
to separate the gel beads by a nonuniform magnetic attractive interactions between the induced magnetic
®eld. Our main intention was to study both temperature dipoles lead to chain formation (Fig. 1c). The interact-
and magnetic ®eld sensitivity of MNIPA gels. Gel beads ing particles are aligned parallel with respect to the
with an average diameter of 2,0 mm and a narrow size applied ®eld.
distribution were prepared and investigated [21]. We have studied the temperature dependence of the
Several MNIPA gel beads distributed randomly in magnetic gel beads. The temperature sensitivity is an
a Petri dish are shown in Fig. 1a. Without an external important property for several applications, for exam-
magnetic ®eld, the beads do not attract each other and ple, controlled drug release, soft actuator. It was found
as a result they do not form aggregates. This visual that as for the nonmagnetic NIPA gels, an abrupt
observation tells us that the gel beads have no perma- volume change in response to the temperature change
nent magnetisation. This result is also supported by observed. This is demonstrated in Figs. 2 and 3.
magnetisation measurements. Figure 2 shows that due to an increase in tempera-
Magnetisable particles, such as MNIPA gel beads, ture, the volume of the gel bead decreases signi®cantly.
experience a force in nonuniform magnetic ®elds. This The degree of swelling has changed form 1 to 0.15.
phenomenon, called magnetophoresis, is the result of a In order to study the eect of incorporated magnetite
MAP force directed along the gradient of the magnetic nanoparticles on the temperature sensitivity of the gels,
®eld (Table 1): this eect is shown in Fig. 1b. The we determined the temperature dependence of the bead
nonuniform magnetic ®eld is induced by a permanent size. These results are shown in Fig. 3. It is seen that the
magnet (not seen in the ®gure) placed under the Petri temperature dependence of the volume (or size) charges
dish. The beads are attracted to point where the of MNIPA gels is very similar to that of unloaded NIPA
magnetic ®eld has its maximum intensity and are gels. This ®nding means that incorporation of magnetite
repelled from the point where the magnetic ®eld is a nanoparticles into NIPA gels does not aect the
minimum. As a consequence all the beads gather where temperature sensitivity signi®cantly.
the ®eld intensity has the highest value. This position
corresponds to the surface of the permanent magnet,
which cannot be seen in the ®gure. It can also be seen Muscular contraction mimicked by magnetic gels
from the ®gure that the time required to collect all the
beads is rather short: this process took place within 24 s. Since muscle tissue consists of 80% multicomponent
When the ®eld is turned o, the induced magnetic aqueous solution and 20% proteins that comprise the
Fig. 1a±c In¯uence of uniform and nonuniform magnetic ®elds on j (MNIPA) gel beads. a No magnetic ®eld is applied, b nonuniform
magnetic ®eld is created by a permanent magnet, c homogeneous magnetic ®eld. The arrow indicates the direction of the ®eld
101
this point. The steady current intensity in the solenoid- stimulus results in a large decrease in the length of the
based electromagnet was varied in order to produce gel. When the ®eld is turned o, the gel stretches again.
dierent magnetic ®eld distributions. The maximum We have determined the work done by the ferrogel as
magnetic ®eld strength (magnetic ¯ux density) of a function of the load. These results can be seen in Fig.5.
300 mT developed at the upper part of the gel and It is worth mentioning that we used a cylindrical gel,
disappeared within 120 mm along the axis of the which had an overall volume of 12 cm3. The gel
cylindrical gel sample. It is worth mentioning that contained 0.72 g polymer (PVA) and 0.96 g magnetite
300 mT is a ®eld strength which is less than the ®eld nanoparticles.
strength measured at the surface of common permanent
magnets. Due to the ®eld gradient directed from bottom
to top along the gel axis, contraction occurs. Figure 4 Control of pseudomuscular contraction
shows that under load conditions stimulation of a
magnetic gel will cause it to contract. Besides theoretical interest, for future applications it is
Since the highest magnetic ®eld strength can be necessary to understand the basic relationships between
controlled by the intensity of the steady current ¯owing the work done, the properties of gels as well as the
through the electromagnet, it is possible to realise magnetic ®eld distribution. We consider here a vertically
dierent degrees of contraction as shown in Fig. 4. suspended cylindrical magnetic gel by means of which
The maximum ®eld strength can be seen to increase from a nonmagnetic load can be lifted up. First the gel is
left to right in Fig. 4. One can establish the fact that preloaded with a mass, M. As a consequence a passive
signi®cant contraction can be induced by moderate strain, kM , develops. The magnitude of this extension
magnetic ®eld gradients. In this case the strongest ®eld can be calculated on the basis of rubber elasticity theory
intensity is 300 mT, and this disappears within 120 mm [18]:
along the gel axis. k3M ÿ ak2M ÿ 1 0 :
1
The contractile activity of magnetic gels can be used
to lift a load that is to produce work. A nonmagnetic In this equation it is assumed that Gaussian behaviour
load (lead) of variable mass was connected to the lower could be used as an approximation. The dimensionless
end of the gel. A charge-coupled-device camera provid- quantity a includes the ratio of nominal stress, rn and
ing the displacement of the lower part of the gel with an the modulus, G:
accuracy of 0.01 mm monitored the contraction of the rn Mg
gel. a :
2
G a0 G
In the presence of a load the gel ®rst elongates
(passive strain). When a magnetic ®eld is created, as a Here g represents the gravitational constant and a0
consequence, a contraction (active strain) takes place. If denotes the undeformed cross-sectional area of the gel at
the mass of the load is not too high, the net eect is a rest. When an external magnetic ®eld is applied the
signi®cant contraction. It can be seen that the magnetic strain will be changed to kM;H , which is the overall
strain. Considering the homogeneous deformation
and the linear relationship between magnetisation and
magnetic ®eld strength, on the basis of the additivity of
mechanical and magnetic stress it is possible to derive
Eq. (3) [17].
ÿ
k3M;H ÿ ak2M;H ÿ b Hh2 ÿ Hm2 kM;H ÿ 1 0 ;
3
Fig. 4 Active deformation of a magnetic-®eld-sensitive gel under a Fig. 5 Mechanical work released by a ferrogel as a function of the
load load
103
References
1. Gandhi MV, Thompson BS (1992) 7. Rosenweig RE (1985) Ferrohydrody- 15. ZrõÂ nyi M, Barsi L, BuÈki A (1997)
Smart materials and structures. Chap- namics. Cambridge University Press, Polym Gels Networks 5:415
man and Hall, London Cambridge 16. Szabo D, Szeghy G, Zrinyi M (1998)
2. Peppas NA, Korsmeyer RW (eds) 8. Jones TB (1995) Electromechanics of Macromolecules 31:6541
(1987) Hydrogels in medicine and particles. Cambridge University Press, 17. Zrinyi M, Szabo D, Barsi L (1999) In:
pharmacology. CRC Press, Boca Ra- Cambridge Osada Y, De Rossi (eds) Polymer
ton 9. Osada Y (1987) Adv Polym Sci 82:1 sensors and actuators. Springer, Berlin
3. De Rossi, Kawana K, Osada Y, Yam- 10. Bagshow CR (1994) Muscle contrac- Heidelberg New York (to be published)
auchi A (1991) Polymer gels, funda- tion. Chapman & Hall, London 18. Mark JE, Erman B (1988) Rubberlike
mentals and biomedical applications. 11. Barsi L, BuÈki A, Szabo D, Zrõ nyi M elasticity. A molecular primer. Wiley,
Plenum Press, New York (1996) Prog Colloid Polym Sci 102:57 New York
4. Harland RS, PrudÂhomme RK (eds) 12. ZrõÂ nyi M, Barsi L, BuÈki A (1996) 19. Zrinyi M, Horkay F (1993) J Intell
(1992) Polyelectrolyte gels. ACS Sym- J Chem Phys 104:20 Mater Syst Struct 4:190
posium Series 480. American Chemical 13. ZrõÂ nyi M, Barsi L, Szabo D, Kilian H-G 20. Ginder JM, Nichols ME, Elie LD,
Society, Washington, DC (1997) J Chem Phys 106:5685 Tardi JL Smart Material Technolo-
5. Okano T (ed) (1998) Biorelated poly- 14. ZrõÂ nyi M (1997) Trends Polym Sci gies (in press)
mers and gels. Academic Press, Boston 5:277 21. Xulu PM, Filipcsei G, ZrõÂ nyi M
6. Tanaka T (1978) Phys Rev Lett 40:820 (submitted to Macromolecules)