INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FROM (IPCRF)

Name of Ratee: Name of Rater:

Position Position:
Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFROMANCE ACTUAL RATING

PER INDICATORS RESULTS Q E T AVE SCORE
KRA (Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
Basic Instructional  Performed June 2015 30% 5-*Organized appropriate class programs 4 4 4 4 4 1.2
Education Leadership instructional to *Monitored & supervised the Teaching-
Services supervision March learning process
2016 *Collected, analyzed and utilized data to
identify & plan needed for interventions
*Recommended localized curriculum (mother
tongue based) for instruction
*Developed standards for outstanding teacher
& pupil performance

4- Four (4) of 5 requirements satisfied (with

evidences)
3- Three (3) of 5 requirements satisfied (with
evidences)

2-Some requirements satisfied without

evidences
1-Requirements & reports largely missing

Learning June 10% 5-*Monitored ,evaluated IMs and 4 4 4 4 4 0.4

Environment  Provided safe and child 2015 to recommended other possible IMs that are
friendly learning and March child friendly
school environment for 2016 *Printed student manual for reference on
learners school policies for outmost pupil discipline
 *Provisioned of school activities/programs
that encourage full participation of learners
*Ensured proper use & maintenance of school
facilities, equipment, textbooks &
supplies/materials
*Instructed teachers on proper classroom
structure that is conducive to learning
4- Four (4) of 5 requirements satisfied (with
evidences)
3- Three (3) of 5 requirements satisfied (with
evidences)

2-Some requirements satisfied without

evidences
1-Requirements & reports largely missing

School June 20% 4 4 4 4 4 0.8

Leadership & 2015 to 5-*Prepared/consolidated reports
Management Performed school leadership March *Led in the formulation & evaluation of SIP &
and management functions 2016 AIP for achieving better learning outcomes
*Ensured participation of stakeholders in the
development & acquisition of learning
resources & equipment
* Participated equitable distribution of
teaching loads & observed teacher-learner
ratio
*Promoted harmonious relationship between
teachers and among stakeholders in the
realization of school goals/objectives
4- Four (4) of 5 mechanisms mentioned are
present
3- Three (3) of mechanisms mentioned are
present
2-Some mechanisms mentioned are present
June 2015 10% 1-One (1) of 5 mechanisms mentioned are 4 4 4 4 4 0.4
Human Resource to March present
Management &  Organized & 2016 5-100% of teachers were provided with
Development Conducted INSETs/LAC technical assistance with corresponding
Sessions evidences like teachers portfolio containing
observation reports, TSNA results,
 performance analysis and recommendations
for development, performance contracts &
performance evaluation results
4- 95-86% of teachers were provided with
technical assistance with required evidences
3- 81-85% of teachers were provided with
technical assistance with required evidences
2-80% of teachers were provided with
technical assistance with required evidences
Some requirements satisfied without
evidences
Parents’ June 2015 10% 1-below 75% of teachers were provided with 4 4 4 4 4 0.4
Involvement & to technical assistance with required evidences
Community March
Partnership  Established community 2016 5-*Conducted regular/periodic PTA
partnership for school meetings/conferences
performance *Visited parents of pupils needing academic
monitoring/follow-up
*Undertook/Initiated
projects/events/activities for school
improvement
*Established linkages of non-government
organizations to support school projects
*Established positive relationship with
stakeholders
4- Four (4) of 5 mechanisms mentioned are
present
3- Three (3) of mechanisms mentioned are
present
Financial June 20% 2-Some mechanisms mentioned are present 5 5 5 5 5 1.0
Management 2015 to 1-One (1) of 5 mechanisms mentioned are
March present
 Directed ,coordinated 2016
and managed school 5-100% accomplished all financial liquidation
funds according to reports to proper stakeholders (supported by
prioritized needs evidences)
4- 76-99% submission of financial liquidation
reports to proper stakeholders (supported by
evidences
 3- 51-75% submission of financial liquidation
reports to proper stakeholders (supported by
evidences
2- 26-50% submission of financial liquidation
reports to proper stakeholders (supported by
evidences
1-0-25% submission of financial liquidation
reports to proper stakeholders (supported by
evidences

Overall Rating for 4.2

Accomplishments VS

Public Schools District Supervisor Head Teacher-I Acting Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Ratee Approving Authority